Re: 2016 Election Day Night
Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:39 pm
The Cherokee half of my family wishes they thought of building a wall about 500 years ago.
What you don't know can't hurt them.
https://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/
https://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/viewtopic.php?t=40145
OP ED » Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:39 pm wrote:The Cherokee half of my family wishes they thought of building a wall about 500 years ago.
He'll pull the trigger till it goes click.What if Jesus comes back during the Trump administration?
You're talking about Latinos, I'm talking about Muslims. The vast majority of illegal immigrants in the US are Christians. Why is no one ranting about banning Christians?Freitag » Wed Nov 16, 2016 2:43 am wrote:Do you understand that it's possible to arrive at the same conclusion from different tracks? Person A wants illegal immigrants deported because they are a flaming racist. Person B wants them deported because they're a drain on public services, undermine our legal immigration system, on principle, whatever. These people want the same thing, but for different reasons. One set of reasons is deplorable, the other isn't. It's like if you voted to re-elect Obama because of the economic recovery, shared social values, etc. etc. But then someone else voted for him because they're on welfare and they know democrats give them more free stuff. Same conclusion, different tracks, one deplorable and one not. Quit assigning deplorable thought processes to people for wanting things that there is a legitimate argument for. Both Left and Right have fringe elements.DrEvil » Tue Nov 15, 2016 1:15 pm wrote:No, it wasn't a smear tactic. Among other things (like getting endorsed by the fucking Klan, which should have a been a big hint), wanting to ban all Muslims from the country is blatantly racist. I don't think you personally are a racist, but you voted for one and helped put him in the White house. Hope it was worth it.Freitag » Wed Nov 16, 2016 12:00 am wrote:Can you drop the act already? Just admit that the "racist" thing was standard political smear tactics. Or is that your story and you're sticking to it? In that case it's going to be a long 8 years for you.seemslikeadream » Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:53 am wrote:campaigned differently.....would that mean more or less racism?
BTW, if the indigenous descendants decide to take back the country, I'm throwing in with them. I cannot stand the thought of my "assent" through taxation for the heinous shit the corporate government inflicts around the world.OP ED » Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:39 pm wrote:The Cherokee half of my family wishes they thought of building a wall about 500 years ago.
Yes. No gods, no masters, no imaginary lines on a map devoid of any inherent meaning.Freitag » Tue Nov 15, 2016 8:27 pm wrote:You're making my point. You assume anyone opposing illegal immigration must be a racist because you can't imagine any other reason they would oppose it. Do you even believe a nation has the right to determine who does and does not enter into it? Are borders, themselves, racist to you?seemslikeadream » Tue Nov 15, 2016 2:23 pm wrote:Freitag » Tue Nov 15, 2016 8:13 pm wrote:So, to you, there's no non-racist reason a person might be against illegal immigration?seemslikeadream » Tue Nov 15, 2016 2:07 pm wrote:they aren't different perspectives ...both are racist
I don't know you tell me.....but what would the reason be for a person to believe a fact that was proven false?
so what would a non racist reason for being against illegal immigration?