Johnny Gosch update

[FourthBase]

Weirdness at websleuths...<br>First the 21 page Gosch thread disappeared.<br>Now the forum is down due to a "busy server".<br>According to a Websleuths "too busy" message.<br>These happened one right after another.<br><br>EDIT: And now the entire site is down, forum and main page.<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Cannot find server or DNS Error<br>Internet Explorer<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=fourthbase>FourthBase</A> at: 9/14/06 3:34 pm<br></i>

[blanc]

chiggerbit. tip of iceberg see "the outragreous cant of Jonathan Aitken and his friends." Guardian article<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/aitken/Story/0,2763,209331,00html">www.guardian.co.uk/aitken...331,00html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>this man yoked to a few corpses<br> <p></p><i></i>

[fuziononline]

So this means that the pictures are a fraud? It looks exactly the same as the one where he has the brand?<br><br>I followed the link to that guys pedo site..I hope the FBI doesn't show up at my door!! <p></p><i></i>

[chiggerbit]

blanc, page cannot be found. <p></p><i></i>

[chiggerbit]

fuz, the pictures themselves may possibly not be frauds. The web site seems to indicate that these are pics that are around on the web. Not sure what that means. It would be good to figure out how old some of the pics are. Do they pre-date the internet? <p></p><i></i>

[blanc]

chiggerbit, I just went there. there's a link from Wikepedia article on JA<br> <p></p><i></i>

[chiggerbit]

Does anybody have the first missing person reports re what color pants Johnny was wearing when he disappeared?<br><br>I'm going to monkey with the pic in my photo program again, see if I get the "leopard" print again. <p></p><i></i>

[FourthBase]

websleuths is back up.<br><br>Weird sequence.<br>Can't wait to hear why the Gosch thread got deleted.<br><br>edit: It's getting "cleaned up".<br>i.e., They're removing the last stuff I said to Roy. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=fourthbase>FourthBase</A> at: 9/14/06 3:58 pm<br></i>

[FourthBase]

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>I'm going to monkey with the pic in my photo program again, see if I get the "leopard" print again.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <br><br>You might want to examine this photo, too, since it seems like it could be the same boy:<br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.jacobstales.com/gallery4/albums/userspics/15044/027.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--><br><br>Does that look like the early 80's?<br>I don't know. Not as much.<br><br>This shit is just getting stranger and stranger.<br><br>edit: It sure as hell ain't the late 70's, is it?<br>Therefore, WTF is up with Zalva?<br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :( --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/frown.gif ALT=":("><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=fourthbase>FourthBase</A> at: 9/14/06 3:56 pm<br></i>

[godzorphan]

this has been a bizarro day for posting and information. Seems like there's a LOT of eyes on all of this right now. Even tho a lot of this is highly triggering for me I am going to try to hang in with it. <br><br>I don't have a problem with the color photo not having the "brand". I always felt like it looked felt-tip markered onto the photo anyway. Either the person is jacking with Noreen or the person is trying to help and indicating where the brand WAS put...but then I struggle with that, because I understood the victims were branded with the rocking X on the buttocks.<br><br>It's very confusing. <p></p><i></i>

[chiggerbit]

No luck. In the black and white one, when I had monkeyed with that one, I got what looked like a fabric pattern or a tone-on-tone leopard print. Now that I've done it in color, it just looks like pixelization, and the pattern shows somewhat on the skin, too. My program's not so good, though. <p></p><i></i>

[chiggerbit]

Don't the ties look like a different material on that latest pic? That's what hit me about the other ones, the "material" looked so FLAT. If it were cloth, you'd think it would roll, not stay flat. So, I wondered if it were some type of tape. These look more like twine or something.<br><br>Could these be pictures for the bonbage-lovers, maybe in conjunction with pedophilia? <p></p><i></i>

[alice]

Straight-legged jeans came in in the 80's I think ?<br>Well actually I know .<br><br>The link doesn't work for me either but typing in websleuths into the "little bar thingy" works ...I tried to join websleths forum last night but failed to meet requirements ?<br> <p></p><i></i>

[streeb]

FB - what makes you think it couldn't be the late 70s or early 80s? <p></p><i></i>

[FourthBase]

I don't know streeb...the vividness of the shirt's red, the tone and fit of the jeans, the off-colored threading of the jeans, the grain and hue of the photo...I mean, I was a baby in the late 70's, so if that stuff was also popular back then or if photos were more vivid than I realize, someone let me know. <p></p><i></i>