Page 4 of 6
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:34 am
by Hugh Manatee Wins
Gawd, HCE, you know nothing about the subject. Zero.
No wonder you act that way.
There's no excuse for not knowing anything about spook media by now.
Use that keyboard in front of you to do some research. I did.
http://rigorousintuition.ca/board/viewtopic.php?t=18523
(Resources on history of CIA in news and entertainment)
Included is a link to the (declassified in 1995) 1953 letters from
a high-level CIA mole at Paramount Pictures back to his CIA contact at Langley. Read the damn letter, mkay?
IF THAT ISN'T ENOUGH FOR YOU...
...I could spoon feed you a big list of books but I'm just going to
start you off with two-
http://www.amazon.com/Hollywood-Goes-Wa ... 0520071611
Hollywood Goes to War: How Politics, Profits and Propaganda Shaped World War II Movies
http://www.amazon.com/Operation-Hollywo ... 1591021820
Operation Hollywood: How the Pentagon Shapes and Censors the Movies

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 4:05 am
by orz
You're in touch with the authors of those books to share your research of course, and they take you totally seriously and don't think you're a nut or anything, and would agree with your theories.... yeah? I mean your theories are so well thought out and not at all contradictory to the reality of how movies are made and the politics behind them as detailed in those books and eleswhere. That's why you post about this stuff on mainstream non-'conspiracy culture' forums all the time, and people are easily convinced by your eloquent and educational posts and sceptics fail to disprove what you are saying and you don't ever get banned for being a copypasta-spewing troll nutcase. And now so many of the 'kidz' know all about this stuff and how to avoid it, seek the truth, improve the world.
YEAH?
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 11:42 am
by brekin
Dora Denies Any Wrongdoing, Says Just Following Orders.

Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2009 2:33 am
by H_C_E
95% of the reason I remain here at Pessimism Central is to hassle Mr. Water Mammal. It would appear I've pushed his buttons again.
Thanks for playing ya' maroon!
PS: It's not that I don't understand, but that I don't care.
Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2009 8:50 pm
by Col. Quisp
I like reading HMW's posts and although I don't agree with all of them, I admire him for taking the time to research thoroughly and come up with novel ideas, unlike most.
HCE - why not just ignore him if you don't care to understand them. Why hassle him all the time?
Propaganda is as old as the hills, why is HMW's theory so outlandish? And those that say he's a CIA plant should be banned in accordance with board policy.
Now to my question:
Why is Dora's mouth always open, Hugh? Any ideas? And that kid in the Pentagon -- his mouth is open too.
on edit forgot to add that I agree with Alice the K about the term "water boarding." I too thought it couldn't be all that bad -- sounded like surfing or something -- until I actually read the description of the process. Yikes
Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 12:26 am
by monster
Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 3:52 am
by Fixx
Col. Quisp wrote:I like reading HMW's posts and although I don't agree with all of them, I admire him for taking the time to research thoroughly and come up with novel ideas, unlike most.
HCE - why not just ignore him if you don't care to understand them. Why hassle him all the time?
Propaganda is as old as the hills, why is HMW's theory so outlandish? And those that say he's a CIA plant should be banned in accordance with board policy.
Now to my question:
Why is Dora's mouth always open, Hugh? Any ideas? And that kid in the Pentagon -- his mouth is open too.
on edit forgot to add that I agree with Alice the K about the term "water boarding." I too thought it couldn't be all that bad -- sounded like surfing or something -- until I actually read the description of the process. Yikes
Perhaps that's why he is here, to discredit the board and get those who think he is a 'spook' or just a troll banned, thus slowly killing Jeff's board by injecting this KWH shite into almost every thread on here. Either that or Hugh is out to discredit KWH himslef, thereby making it a thing of ridicule when any one else mentions it.
My suggestion to Hugh: Fuck off somewhere else with all this shite.[/b]
Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 4:17 am
by monster
Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 4:24 pm
by orz
Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 4:26 pm
by monster
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 12:15 pm
by Seamus OBlimey
Does anyone remember Dick and Dora?
The pic's from.. Happy Venture Readers @ http://www.
sterlingtimes.org/dick_and_dora.htm
And another from google's top ten..
Chapter XII. Dick Visits Dora Stanhope
Maybe Hugh should give up on this one.. it's propaganda for little girls not old men

Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 1:02 pm
by beeline
Every time I see this thread title I crack up
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 1:57 pm
by IanEye
Boots looks pretty content on Cherry Street...
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 2:46 pm
by 8bitagent
Why does Hugh laugh off the "woo" when he himself is applying the same kind of Jake Kotze/Goro Adachi numerology and synchronistic fun and games to events and media?
I mean isn't that the fun here, the challenge? To look at every event or big media situation and extrapolate your own "find the esoteric or deep politic hidden codes"?
Jeff should at random assign us every week a totally random movie,
event, tv show, etc for us to make up our own "NWO/esoteric/CIA" syncs encoded in.
It'd be fun! We could mix and match Hugh Manatee-isms with syncs and numerology, to stitch together a pastiche of fun insanity!
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 3:26 pm
by professorpan
What baffles me the most is the seemingly sane and literate folks who defend the constant stream of outlandish, it-would-be-hilarious-if-it-wasn't-terribly-sad word salad diarrhea emerging from the manatee and splattering into this forum. Guess what? He's not "onto something." He might be "on something" and, if not, definitely should be "on something" of the make-the-voices-go-away variety.
It would all be pure comedy if it weren't so damned depressing to see such schizophrenic disassociation writ large. Really, if he wrote it as satire or in the spirit of play it would be engaging. But as a description of reality... just plain sad.