All other matters aside, I would be disturbed if this board were to lock a thread that's already hit 83 pages.Nordic wrote:so is that misogyny thread locked yet?
"tarbaby" is right.
.
Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
All other matters aside, I would be disturbed if this board were to lock a thread that's already hit 83 pages.Nordic wrote:so is that misogyny thread locked yet?
"tarbaby" is right.
Anyway I purposely have not read the misogyny thread, but I have noticed the inevitable bullying vibe here, among the valuable info I treasure.Well here is a call out to those drifting
on the space bar on the keyboard sea of life….
HOW IS THAT GOD DAMNED FUCKING VOTE
YOU ALL HAD TO MAKE (and HAD to berate
those of us way ahead of you!) WORKIN’ OUT?
He was so great, so good, such a fucking
Community Organiser (you all must never
have known any, any for real!)… He would
do so much good, the rest of us were RACISTS
and worse he was Jesus, he was Martin, he
was FDR, he was JFK, RFK, Ike… he was
everybody! His mother was this, his father
was that… He was manna from somewhere!!
(And he was – and is – nobody, that was my take.)
Gonna do it again in a couple of years?
I hope you all choke on it. And feel
rising vomit every time you look in a mirror.
Here is another thing, what you lot deserve
is to have street cons run on you every day.
Propositioned for and accepting a three card
monte challenge. Every step of the way in life.
Because you WILL fall for it.
marisacat – 24 April 2011
JackRiddler wrote:All other matters aside, I would be disturbed if this board were to lock a thread that's already hit 83 pages.Nordic wrote:so is that misogyny thread locked yet?
"tarbaby" is right.
.
Gee, thanks. I guess we all need a twit or two in which to compare our exaggerated self images from time to time. I'll just take that as a compliment for the role I play.brainpanhandler wrote:I suppose if no one ever tells you what a twit you are you'll never know, not that you will now either. twit. But I don't mean that in a bad way.
yes. that would be a shame. especially considering how nice OP ED was trying to be.JackRiddler wrote:All other matters aside, I would be disturbed if this board were to lock a thread that's already hit 83 pages.Nordic wrote:so is that misogyny thread locked yet?
"tarbaby" is right.
.
all right, all right.. I can get past the bunnies. But I guess it's amazing to me that that's the only "political" blog that is run by a female that could be brought to mind.Canadian_watcher wrote:what? there are bunnies and dogs on there. And Royals.jam.fuse wrote:best and only i know of female operated political blog
http://marisacat.wordpress.com/
Try this one: http://firedoglake.com/ for starters
I don't think it is.RI is the good ol' boys club
Tits are not only allowed, but encouraged. I think Jeff has made a concerted effort to attract women and create a space where they can feel free to speak their minds.no tits allowed (unless we're willing to suck it - or perhaps them! - up).
I think that's clearly untrue.Clearly discussion of any sort that threatens the boys' points of view can't be had
way too broad a brush stroke.and any attempts to engage in communication beyond what the boys want to hear is going to be met with failure (re: futile frustration); much less attempting to let them know any part of a woman's experience.
It is a tricky and difficult task to get the other gender to truly understand what it is like to walk in your shoes, even when they want to, but again, way to broad a brush you're using here.You can't teach men anything
Would you put that brush down already.just like you can't change the world.
Yes. let's all retreat into our own little worlds. That'll fix things.The only way around it is to simply not engage with them, and pull your own little world together as best as you can, as individuals.
I can't respect that decision on these grounds, but that's your call.I'm outta here.
I'm not a boy and I'm not having fun, at least at the moment.Have fun, boys.
can you tell me the purpose of this?brainpanhandler wrote:I don't think it is.RI is the good ol' boys club
Tits are not only allowed, but encouraged. I think Jeff has made a concerted effort to attract women and create a space where they can feel free to speak their minds.no tits allowed (unless we're willing to suck it - or perhaps them! - up).
I think that's clearly untrue.Clearly discussion of any sort that threatens the boys' points of view can't be had
way too broad a brush stroke.and any attempts to engage in communication beyond what the boys want to hear is going to be met with failure (re: futile frustration); much less attempting to let them know any part of a woman's experience.
It is a tricky and difficult task to get the other gender to truly understand what it is like to walk in your shoes, even when they want to, but again, way to broad a brush you're using here.You can't teach men anything
Would you put that brush down already.just like you can't change the world.
Yes. let's all retreat into our own little worlds. That'll fix things.The only way around it is to simply not engage with them, and pull your own little world together as best as you can, as individuals.
I can't respect that decision on these grounds, but that's your call.I'm outta here.
I'm not a boy and I'm not having fun, at least at the moment.Have fun, boys.
If she had said that minus the "driving out females" I would have had no objection. Women can choose to freely come and go, speak or not.cw wrote:there may only be a small group of "boys" who fall into the category of disruptive sexist on this board, but the thing is Maddy is feeling frustrated that they are allowed to get away with their shenanigans and driving out females.
quite so.. but we don't want to want to go. And the people here should ask themselves why we would choose not to stay. Don't you think?brainpanhandler wrote: If she had said that minus the "driving out females" I would have had no objection. Women can choose to freely come and go, speak or not.
Of course not, but if one of the reasons women are choosing not to stay is because they believe RI is a "good ol' boys club" I think they are wrong and doing a disservice to themselves as well as disregarding the obvious attempts Jeff has made to make the board more women friendly. Maybe I'm blind to it. Can one of the women show me how RI can be fairly described as a "good ol' boys club"?Canadian_watcher wrote:quite so.. but we don't want to want to go. And the people here should ask themselves why we would choose not to stay. Don't you think?brainpanhandler wrote: If she had said that minus the "driving out females" I would have had no objection. Women can choose to freely come and go, speak or not.
I guess it's a little like Catholics who try and change the status quo in the Church. I wondered why they would bother.. why wouldn't they just leave the Church if they didn't like it? But then I realized that their fight was to make something that they loved even better. They didn't want to choose between belonging to something that they partly loved and leaving it altogether - they wanted a voice in making it the best place it could be.
Is that wrong?
no, no one can, but that's not because the vibe does not exist.brainpanhandler wrote:Of course not, but if one of the reasons women are choosing not to stay is because they believe RI is a "good ol' boys club" I think they are wrong and doing a disservice to themselves as well as disregarding the obvious attempts Jeff has made to make the board more women friendly. Maybe I'm blind to it. Can one of the women show me how RI can be fairly described as a "good ol' boys club"?Canadian_watcher wrote:quite so.. but we don't want to want to go. And the people here should ask themselves why we would choose not to stay. Don't you think?brainpanhandler wrote: If she had said that minus the "driving out females" I would have had no objection. Women can choose to freely come and go, speak or not.
I guess it's a little like Catholics who try and change the status quo in the Church. I wondered why they would bother.. why wouldn't they just leave the Church if they didn't like it? But then I realized that their fight was to make something that they loved even better. They didn't want to choose between belonging to something that they partly loved and leaving it altogether - they wanted a voice in making it the best place it could be.
Is that wrong?