Threats to Internet Freedoms (consolidation thread)

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Post Reply
crikkett
Posts: 2206
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:03 pm

Re: Threats to Internet Freedoms (consolidation thread)

Post by crikkett »

wintler2 wrote:It is nice that wikipedia & google are making todays symbolic black-out stand against SOPA, wouldn't it be marvellous if they made it material and stopped serving IP addresses for SOPA supporters?


Symbolic of what? I am able to search on Google and click their ads perfectly fine.
User avatar
wintler2
Posts: 2884
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 3:43 am
Location: Inland SE Aus.

Post by wintler2 »

Thats the problem with the symbolic, and why i'm trying to think more about the material.
"Wintler2, you are a disgusting example of a human being, the worst kind in existence on God's Earth. This is not just my personal judgement.." BenD

Research question: are all god botherers authoritarians?
crikkett
Posts: 2206
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:03 pm

Re:

Post by crikkett »

wintler2 wrote:Thats the problem with the symbolic, and why i'm trying to think more about the material.

They might as well be waving a little plastic American flag for all the protectin' our freedoms they're doing with this 'protest'.
User avatar
Allegro
Posts: 4456
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: just right of Orion

Re: Threats to Internet Freedoms (consolidation thread)

Post by Allegro »

.
Wikipedia is back to normal :yay.
I missed it. Yep, I did.
Allegro wrote:.
A few minutes ago, I found this notice.
Wikipedia wrote:Imagine a World Without Free Knowledge

For over a decade, we have spent millions of hours building the largest encyclopedia in human history. Right now, the U.S. Congress is considering legislation that could fatally damage the free and open internet. For 24 hours, to raise awareness, we are blacking out Wikipedia. Learn more.

Contact your representatives.
Art will be the last bastion when all else fades away.
~ Timothy White (b 1952), American rock music journalist
_________________
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context

Re: Threats to Internet Freedoms (consolidation thread)

Post by Hugh Manatee Wins »

The exposure of fascist technology, history, and science is the biggest threat to social control there is.
It only exists on the internet.
It could viral market...on the internet.

Hence the move towards eliminating habeus corpus for websites. Eventually.
CIA runs mainstream media since WWII:
news rooms, movies/TV, publishing
...
Disney is CIA for kidz!
User avatar
slomo
Posts: 1781
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 8:42 pm

Re: Threats to Internet Freedoms (consolidation thread)

Post by slomo »

Supreme Court Says Congress May Re-Copyright Public Domain Works

Congress may take books, musical compositions and other works out of the public domain, where they can be freely used and adapted, and grant them copyright status again, the Supreme Court ruled Wednesday.

In a 6-2 ruling, the court said that, just because material enters the public domain, it is not “territory that works may never exit.”

more...
User avatar
Stephen Morgan
Posts: 3736
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:37 am
Location: England
Contact:

Re: Threats to Internet Freedoms (consolidation thread)

Post by Stephen Morgan »

Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that all was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, and make it possible. -- Lawrence of Arabia
hanshan
Posts: 1673
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 5:04 pm

Re: Threats to Internet Freedoms (consolidation thread)

Post by hanshan »

...


Stephen Morgan wrote:https://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2002/4/25/1345/03329


Excellent Morgan, tx



Plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose ...


...
User avatar
Stephen Morgan
Posts: 3736
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:37 am
Location: England
Contact:

Re: Threats to Internet Freedoms (consolidation thread)

Post by Stephen Morgan »

Thomas Babbington MacAuley got his way, though.
Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that all was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, and make it possible. -- Lawrence of Arabia
hanshan
Posts: 1673
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 5:04 pm

Re: Threats to Internet Freedoms (consolidation thread)

Post by hanshan »

...

Stephen Morgan wrote:Thomas Babbington MacAuley got his way, though.


Indeed.( & don't they all...)


...
User avatar
Stephen Morgan
Posts: 3736
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:37 am
Location: England
Contact:

Re: Threats to Internet Freedoms (consolidation thread)

Post by Stephen Morgan »

hanshan wrote:...

Stephen Morgan wrote:Thomas Babbington MacAuley got his way, though.


Indeed.( & don't they all...)


...


Well, he got a reasonable copyright policy, which is good. Not as good as no intellectual property at all, mind, but not bad.
Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that all was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, and make it possible. -- Lawrence of Arabia
User avatar
JackRiddler
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Threats to Internet Freedoms (consolidation thread)

Post by JackRiddler »

.

Hm, next day: Megaupload shutdown, followed by Anonymous retaliation on MPAA etc.

The story is not without its color: "Mr. Dotcom" a.k.a. "Dr. Evil."


http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/20/techn ... nted=print

January 19, 2012
7 Charged as F.B.I. Closes a Top File-Sharing Site
By BEN SISARIO

In what the federal authorities on Thursday called one of the largest criminal copyright cases ever brought, the Justice Department and the Federal Bureau of Investigation seized the Web site Megaupload and charged seven people connected with it with running an international enterprise based on Internet piracy.

Coming just a day after civil protests in the United States over proposed antipiracy bills, the arrests were greeted almost immediately with digital Molotov cocktails. The hacker collective that calls itself Anonymous attacked the Web sites of the Justice Department and several major entertainment companies and trade groups in retaliation for Mega-upload’s seizure. The Justice Department’s site and several others remained inaccessible for much of Thursday afternoon.

Megaupload, one of the most popular so-called locker services on the Internet, allowed users to anonymously transfer large files like movies and music. Media companies have long accused it of abetting copyright infringement on a vast scale. In a grand jury indictment, Megaupload is accused of causing $500 million in damages to copyright owners and of making $175 million through selling ads and premium subscriptions.

Four of the seven people, including the site’s founder, Kim Dotcom (born Kim Schmitz), have been arrested in New Zealand, the authorities said; the three others remain at large. Each of the seven people — who the indictment said were members of a criminal group it called “Mega Conspiracy” — is charged with five counts of copyright infringement and conspiracy. The charges could result in more than 20 years in prison.

As part of the crackdown, more than 20 search warrants were executed in the United States and in eight other countries. About $50 million in assets were also seized, as well as a number of servers and 18 domain names that formed Megaupload’s network of file-sharing sites.

Ira P. Rothken, a lawyer for Megaupload, said in a phone interview on Thursday that “Megaupload believes the government is wrong on the facts, wrong on the law.”

The case against Megaupload comes at a charged time, a day after broad online protests against a pair of antipiracy bills in Congress, the Stop Online Piracy Act, or SOPA, in the House, and the Protect I.P. Act, or PIPA, in the Senate.

The bills would give federal authorities expanded powers to crack down on foreign sites suspected of piracy. But technology companies and civil liberties groups say that the powers are too broadly defined and could effectively result in censorship. On Wednesday, Google and Wikipedia joined dozens of sites in political theatrics by blacking out some content and explaining their arguments against the laws.

Anonymous, which has previously set its sights on PayPal, Sony and major media executives, was more blunt in its response. The group disabled the Justice Department’s site for a time, and it also claimed credit for shutting down sites for the Motion Picture Association of America and the Recording Industry Association of America, two of the most powerful media lobbies in Washington, as well as those of the Universal Music Group, the largest music label, and BMI, which represents music publishers.

“Let’s just say, for #SOPA supporters their #SOPAblackout is today,” Anonymous wrote in a Twitter post. In an e-mail, a spokesman for the group said it was responsible for the Web attacks.

The Megaupload case touches on many of the most controversial aspects of the antipiracy debate. Megaupload and similar sites, like Rapidshare and Mediafire, are often promoted as convenient ways to legitimately transfer large files; a recent promotional video had major stars like Will.i.am of the Black Eyed Peas singing Mega-upload’s praises. But they have become notorious inside media companies, which see the legitimate uses as a veil concealing extensive theft.

Mr. Dotcom, a portly 37-year-old with dual Finnish and German citizenship, has made himself a visible target. He splits his time between Hong Kong and New Zealand and casts himself in flamboyant YouTube videos. His role as one of the most prominent Web locker operators has earned him a half-joking nickname in Hollywood: Dr. Evil.

According to the indictment, he earned $42 million from Mega-upload’s operations in 2010.

The indictment against Mega-upload, which stems from a federal investigation that began two years ago, was handed down by a grand jury in Virginia two weeks ago but was not unsealed until Thursday.

It quotes extensively from correspondence among the defendants, who work for Megaupload and its related sites. The correspondence, the indictment says, shows that the operators knew the site contained unauthorized content.

The indictment cites an e-mail from last February, for example, in which three members of the group discussed an article about how to stop the government from seizing domain names.

The Megaupload case is unusual, said Orin S. Kerr, a law professor at George Washington University, in that federal prosecutors obtained the private e-mails of Megaupload’s operators in an effort to show they were operating in bad faith.

“The government hopes to use their private words against them,” Mr. Kerr said. “This should scare the owners and operators of similar sites.”

Nicole Perlroth contributed reporting.

We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
Stephen Morgan
Posts: 3736
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:37 am
Location: England
Contact:

Re: Threats to Internet Freedoms (consolidation thread)

Post by Stephen Morgan »

1. [url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/business/documents/megaupload_indictment.pdf?tid=sm_twitter_washingtonpost]KIM DOTCOM, MEGAUPLOAD LIMITED, VESTOR LIMITED, FINN
BATATO, JULIUS BENCKO, SVEN ECHTERNACH[/url], MATHIAS ORTMANN, ANDRUS
NOMM, and BRAM VAN DER KOLK, the defendants, and others known and unknown to the
Grand Jury, were members of the “Mega Conspiracy,” a worldwide criminal organization whose
members engaged in criminal copyright infringement and money laundering on a massive scale
with estimated harm to copyright holders well in excess of $500,000,000 and reported income in
excess of $175,000,000.


The MEGA CONSPIRACY! And all because of UMG's vendetta, most likely. Expect more to follow. Grooveshark next, maybe.
Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that all was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, and make it possible. -- Lawrence of Arabia
User avatar
Stephen Morgan
Posts: 3736
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:37 am
Location: England
Contact:

Re: Threats to Internet Freedoms (consolidation thread)

Post by Stephen Morgan »

Apparently more than 70 armed officers arrived by helicopter to take Kim Dotcom into custody.
Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that all was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, and make it possible. -- Lawrence of Arabia
User avatar
JackRiddler
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Threats to Internet Freedoms (consolidation thread)

Post by JackRiddler »

Stephen Morgan wrote:Apparently more than 70 armed officers arrived by helicopter to take Kim Dotcom into custody.


I'll just guess: 1% of all NZ security forces?

Correction: from NZ Police page.

With over 11,000 staff it is the largest law enforcement agency in New Zealand, and with few exceptions has primary jurisdiction over the majority of New Zealand criminal law.


So throwing in other ages probably closer to .5% of all NZ security forces. Well, how often do they get to play SWAT?

It occurs to me also NZ has become a Hollywood protectorate.

.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
Post Reply