rigorousintuition.ca

Mr. IAMAPHONY has returned!!!
No real revelations (as usual), just more spooky jump-cuts...
wanna see?
Rotten Apple 79:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Ih8F_ELWLw
and,
Rotten Apple 80:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsaGmKgrZgI

Great stuff. Thanks for the heads up!

...turn me on dead man...turn me on dead man...turn me on dead man...turn me on dead man...

The Beatles were aware that they were being monitored as political entities in the mid-60s, just before they quit touring.

McCartney is the Jesse Jackson to Lennon's Martin Luther King Jr.

Ready to strike an apolitical deal for longevity.

I thought it recently came to light that the Feds came to the conclusion that Lennon wasn't a threat because he smoked so much pot???

Seems they got him kind of late, too. Weird timing for that one. JFK, MLK, RFK, the timings on those all made sense (diabolically speaking). But 1981 for Lennon? Why?

Nordic wrote:I
.....
But 1981 for Lennon? Why?

Correction - December 1980...just before the installation of re-fascisti prop Reagan.

Lennon was being wire-tapped by FBI.

They heard that he was wrapping up his declared 5 years of domestic fathering to come back out into public activism as a healed and healthy man.

He was releasing a hit record and back in public view as an icon of 60s anti-authoritarian peacenikism just when the CIA was re-militarizing the USA to run torture gangs in Central America funded by cocaine.

So he was an impediment to fascist history due to his influence on youth....who needed to be cannon fodder or out of the way watching MTV.

The spooks who were surveilling him attempted to hijack his #1 hit record comeback-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starting_Over_(1979_film)

There's a CIA-Hollywood movie scene of the protagonist hyperventilating in a department store and he is handed a
BLACK BAG to breathe into.

Know what an FBI "black bag job" is? Just ask William Turner.
Or see 'Operation Walrus.'

http://aconstantineblacklist.blogspot.c ... -rock.html

.....
Elliot Mintz, friend of Sal Mineo ,was instrumental in exposing "Project Walrus" as a conspiracy regarding Lennon. He had been Lennon's chum too and publicist since 1971. Mintz recalls that some of Yoko's body guards were, at the time, New York Police officers. It is very difficult for a private citizen to legally possess a weapon in New York. The people who can are off duty officers. It is thus, a common celebrity arrangement. There were many files with missing contents at Yoko's apt. after Lennon was killed. Listening devices were planted at the Dakota and once swept clean would reappear. There had been numerous attempts on Yoko's life. One man was arrested at airport who had made a call that he was coming to finish the job and kill Yoko and Sean. There were also calls made to tell her body guards were going to kill her. Sean Lennon said, "I grew up afraid my mother and I were going to be killed".

After John's murder the first promoting of Project Walrus was the ruining of his reputation. John had known he was wire-tapped and was justifiably paranoid. After Watergate he filed a lawsuit for wiretap and surveillance and made some progress. Justice Dept. never would admit it actually carried out the wiretap and blamed it on other possibilities. After he got his green card he gave up the litigation. Lennon overcame his fear of federal harassment and gave public statements that were anti-republican.

Killing Lennon was only the first step. All that he signified must be defaced. That was the principle
objective of Walrus. His diaries were stolen and returned later with extra entries and some entries
altered. Fred Seaman wrote a defamatory book on Lennon. Seaman was to be executive of Lennon's archives, and much was feigned regarding their bond. He told friends he was going to discredit Ono at all costs. The goal was to drive her to a nervous breakdown and discredit her attempt to set straight the public record. The "walrus crew" anticipated immense profits. Dead Lennon's=$$$ $$....... money. ....

The events at the Dakota began to sound like the Movie "Gaslight". (In which a husband tries to drive his wife crazy by reality distortion) Yoko began sleeping badly. One of Yoko's assistants, wracked by stress began packing a gun at all times. He said "you do not know how big this is. The people doing this are too big to fight." To discredit Lennon and Yoko and the Peace movement was a major part of Operation Walrus. (But it didn't and IT WILL NOT, "WE SHALL OVERCOME", SHANT WE YOKO AND SEAN ET AL?
.....

Nordic wrote:I thought it recently came to light that the Feds came to the conclusion that Lennon wasn't a threat because he smoked so much pot???

Seems they got him kind of late, too. Weird timing for that one. JFK, MLK, RFK, the timings on those all made sense (diabolically speaking). But 1981 for Lennon? Why?

Hugh Manatee Wins wrote:

Nordic wrote:I
.....
But 1981 for Lennon? Why?

Correction - December 1980...just before the installation of re-fascisti prop Reagan.

Lennon was being wire-tapped by FBI.

They heard that he was wrapping up his declared 5 years of domestic fathering to come back out into public activism as a healed and healthy man.

He was releasing a hit record and back in public view as an icon of 60s anti-authoritarian peacenikism just when the CIA was re-militarizing the USA to run torture gangs in Central America funded by cocaine.

So he was an impediment to fascist history due to his influence on youth....who needed to be cannon fodder or out of the way watching MTV.

The spooks who were surveilling him attempted to hijack his #1 hit record comeback-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starting_Over_(1979_film)

There's a CIA-Hollywood movie scene of the protagonist hyperventilating in a department store and he is handed a
BLACK BAG to breathe into.

Know what an FBI "black bag job" is? Just ask William Turner.
Or see 'Operation Walrus.'

http://aconstantineblacklist.blogspot.c ... -rock.html

.....
Elliot Mintz, friend of Sal Mineo ,was instrumental in exposing "Project Walrus" as a conspiracy regarding Lennon. He had been Lennon's chum too and publicist since 1971. Mintz recalls that some of Yoko's body guards were, at the time, New York Police officers. It is very difficult for a private citizen to legally possess a weapon in New York. The people who can are off duty officers. It is thus, a common celebrity arrangement. There were many files with missing contents at Yoko's apt. after Lennon was killed. Listening devices were planted at the Dakota and once swept clean would reappear. There had been numerous attempts on Yoko's life. One man was arrested at airport who had made a call that he was coming to finish the job and kill Yoko and Sean. There were also calls made to tell her body guards were going to kill her. Sean Lennon said, "I grew up afraid my mother and I were going to be killed".

After John's murder the first promoting of Project Walrus was the ruining of his reputation. John had known he was wire-tapped and was justifiably paranoid. After Watergate he filed a lawsuit for wiretap and surveillance and made some progress. Justice Dept. never would admit it actually carried out the wiretap and blamed it on other possibilities. After he got his green card he gave up the litigation. Lennon overcame his fear of federal harassment and gave public statements that were anti-republican.

Killing Lennon was only the first step. All that he signified must be defaced. That was the principle
objective of Walrus. His diaries were stolen and returned later with extra entries and some entries
altered. Fred Seaman wrote a defamatory book on Lennon. Seaman was to be executive of Lennon's archives, and much was feigned regarding their bond. He told friends he was going to discredit Ono at all costs. The goal was to drive her to a nervous breakdown and discredit her attempt to set straight the public record. The "walrus crew" anticipated immense profits. Dead Lennon's=$$$ $$....... money. ....

The events at the Dakota began to sound like the Movie "Gaslight". (In which a husband tries to drive his wife crazy by reality distortion) Yoko began sleeping badly. One of Yoko's assistants, wracked by stress began packing a gun at all times. He said "you do not know how big this is. The people doing this are too big to fight." To discredit Lennon and Yoko and the Peace movement was a major part of Operation Walrus. (But it didn't and IT WILL NOT, "WE SHALL OVERCOME", SHANT WE YOKO AND SEAN ET AL?
.....

Hugh nailed the why part of it.

As for the how...



Have a good long look at the diagram above, and tell me that the bullet holes in the doorway didn't more likely come from behind Lennon and to the LEFT, which is right where the doorman booth was (and still is today).

The doorman that night was a man named Jose Perdomo. This website makes a compelling argument that Jose Perdomo worked with the CIA's own Frank Sturgis for over a decade.

http://www.jfkmontreal.com/john_lennon/ ... erdomo.htm

As for McCartney, well, there's much more going on with him than meets the eye, but it's very new world orderesque in its denseness and complexity. Either he really was replaced, or they've spent a great deal of time and effort trying to get people to THINK that he was replaced. I'm not 100% certain which is the case, but I believe that the reason the clues were planted were to get people scouring the Beatles' work with a fine-toothed comb, because most of the Paul is Dead clues are wrapped up in mystery school type esoterica. Researching Paul is Dead soon leads to astrology, mythology, synchronicity, biblical study, Eastern religions, chakras, ancient Egypt, the Mayas, the Sumerians, etc. I believe that they saw themselves as modern day prophets, charged with waking people up to the reality beneath the reality.

And as crazy as it all seems, there are some very strange smoking guns out there.

For example, look at this photo that appeared in The Beatles Monthly Magazine in August of 1968.

It also appeared in Dennis O'Dell's book, At the Apple's Core (he produced A Hard Day's Night).

Tell me how many Pauls you see.



Here's the photo in context.



Now, as i said above, either there really were multiple Pauls on that boat, or somebody faked the photo in 1968 and planted it in the book, but did nothing to publicize it. They just stuck it in there and never said a word about it.

Here's another odd photo. This one's from a 1978 Wings recording session.



Here's a still from the Wonderful Christmas Time video.



Both of those people are clearly Paul McCartney, and yet, there are also some differences. Note the noses, ears, and sideburns.

Here's that shot in the context of the video, showing that it's actually two different people, as opposed to just some studio trickery.



Regardless of how that shot was constructed, you have to ask yourself WHY?

It's never John, or Ringo, or David Lee Roth. It's always strange references to Paul having died, or to multiple Pauls, which brings me back to the original premise, which is that at the very least, somebody has been playing games with us for about 43 years.

And yes, I DO realize that this post may jeopardize my credibility with certain board members, but you have to admit that there's been some pretty weird stuff going on with Paul McCartney, and it goes way beyond the hand over Paul's head on Sgt. Pepper.

Nothing proves the fact that 'we get lost in our own stupidity' more than this IAMAPHONY fella!
There was, at one point, an attempt to find out just who, in fact, this guy was! Was he an 'insider'; was he just showing off his editing skills, and, if so, wouldn't he tell us who he was by now. Sadly, when a attempt to figure him out was made by a blogger:
http://iamaphoney.blogspot.com/
The comments went from 'silly' to 'ugly' real quick!!!

"The Walrus was Paul" - Dr. Winston O. Boogie

Check this out. I saw this years ago and loved it.

http://www.ilike.com/artist/Uberkinder/ ... +FalsePaul

You can play the song from the url above. Do it. It's amazing. Amazingly something. I'm not sure exactly what. Aquarian Conspiracy meets They Might be Giants. Gotta love it.

Uberkinder wrote:(Verse 1)
The year after the year the Beatles finished “Help!” (Badwrong Falsepaul)
Paul disappeared, and maybe he really died,
like they said, in a car accident.
All we know is no one’s seen him since (1966).
And then the government greasies got the wind. (Badwrong Falsepaul)
They said “Oh my, we can’t have this! we've
already factored him into our
equation for a cultural values shift, and
Now we’ve got to move before the word gets out. (BadwrongFalsepaul)
Scour the land for a perfect replacement; call
off the tours so that none can tell we’ve
replaced him with somebody else.” (who’s three inches taller)
And thus was born the legend of
(Badwrong Falsepaul), Badwrong Falsepaul.(Repeat 4)

(Verse 2)
And so they finally found the perfect match, (It was Badwrong Falsepaul)
except his lips hung too far down and he had
a crooked chin and so he
wore facial hair until they could fix it.
And so our man, he shook the devil’s hand, Oh, ‘cause the devil said
“I can make you a somebody with all
the girls and money you can eat if
only thou shalt bow down and worship me!", and so they

(Bridge 1)
Cut his lip, and raised it up a little higher.
If you watch him on TV, miming to “Hey Jude”
you can see a “U”,
a little faint white “U” shaped scar.
It’s hard to see, but it’s really there.

(Repeat Chorus)

(Bridge 2)
Badwrong FalsePaul's three inches taller, and his eyes are closer together.
Even his whole head is thinner and taller, and his nose is smaller,
And he gestures with his right hand baby!

(Fade Out)
Yeah he's a Badwrong FalsePaul. He's not a Paul, he's just a Badwrong FalsePaul. I always knew he was a Badwrong FalsePaul...

Bruce Dazzling wrote: Tell me how many Pauls you see.

Perhaps the other McCartney is Mike McGear?

tell me what you see...

IanEye wrote:

Bruce Dazzling wrote: Tell me how many Pauls you see.

Perhaps the other McCartney is Mike McGear?

tell me what you see...

There's actually not too much resemblance between Paul and Mike.

Bruce Dazzling wrote:
There's actually not too much resemblance between Paul and Mike.

yes, but that's not Paul...

IanEye wrote:

Bruce Dazzling wrote:
There's actually not too much resemblance between Paul and Mike.

yes, but that's not Paul...

Maybe, maybe not, but the point at the moment is that Mike McGear isn't either of these fellas.