Infiltration & Agent Provocateurs; Vision Tech; Endless War

[seemslikeadream]

your mission was accomplished when you linked to that islamophobic

[Jerky]

Oh, yeah... Right. It was a TRAP!

That makes total sense, and doesn't at all reek of after-the-fact scrambling to cover your ass after you get caught with your (figurative) pants around your ankles, balls deep in Nazi pussy.

J.

explain why you would link to an islamophobic

To give you enough rope.

To allow you to show everyone on this board just how stupid, unscrupulous, dishonest and evasive you are.

To demonstrate that it is a complete waste of time even to attempt to argue rationally with you.


Mission Accomplished.


HTH

[seemslikeadream]

yes that excuse is really funny or pathetic.....now lets here from alloneword who backed him up he must have put all that stuff in his post about him like the English translation of his book to throw me off

yes they were setting a trap by linking to a guy who is islamophobic

so I would find out that he is in fact islamophobic because that would make me look bad?

even faking concern for the guys death....nice add on for authenticity

[Jerky]

...even faking concern for the guys death....nice add on for authenticity

Yeah, they really went all out!

They should be careful, though. I hear crocodile tears often contain e.coli!

J.

[DrEvil]

What I'm wondering is, if this guy is spouting dumb-ass far right conspiracy theories left and right, why the hell would anyone take him seriously about anything? "All this terrible stuff he's saying is obviously horseshit, but this other thing he says which I agree with is totally true!" *

Isn't it possible to find a more reliable source who isn't also a complete fucking shithead?

* I do agree that the CIA is, to use Jerky's charming expression, balls deep in the mainstream media.

[Belligerent Savant]

* I do agree that the CIA is, to use Jerky's charming expression, balls deep in the mainstream media.

YES.

Telling, then, that Jerky and SLAD have not addressed that fact at all, using typical/cheap misdirection ploys instead.

Seems they've appropriated at least one of the filthy tricks employed by the propagandists they so egregiously promote here.

[seemslikeadream]

Welcome to the RI board.
.....
This is an anti-fascist board. Propagation of fascist, neo-Nazi and "white pride" causes, including sympathetically linking to sites which advocate such, will not be permitted. This includes revisionist histories of the Holocaust.
....
.

I don't think I am required to read anything from an islamophobic, one may be able to post a selected article from an islamophobic that is not proclaiming his hatred but he is still a islamophobic and not worth my time

Dr. Udo Ulfkotte, who thinks the recent E.coli outbreak in Germany is linked to Muslim immigrants’ importation of “fecal jihad.”

Dr. Udo Ulfkotte has made a nice career for himself in Germany by spreading hate and fear against Muslims.
not interested in anything he has to say

it is a disgrace that his name was even posted here

but you guardians of whatever keep on keeping on

[MacCruiskeen]

What I'm wondering is, if this guy is spouting dumb-ass far right conspiracy theories left and right, why the hell would anyone take him seriously about anything? "All this terrible stuff he's saying is obviously horseshit, but this other thing he says which I agree with is totally true!" *

Isn't it possible to find a more reliable source who isn't also a complete fucking shithead?

* I do agree that the CIA is, to use Jerky's charming expression, balls deep in the mainstream media.

You just answered your own question, in the very same post where you asked it.

Here's another question: If you want a first-hand insider's account of the spooks' corrupting influence on the corporate media, who do you turn to?

Isn't it possible to find a more reliable source who isn't also a complete fucking shithead?

There are many other sources. I mentioned one of them upthread: Patrick Martin of the World Socialist Web Site (WSWS). Of course no response was forthcoming from the Jerk-Dream Axis. Being the kind of people they are, they prefer to hide when they can't answer a question. Q.E.D., yet again.

The CIA takeover of the Democratic Party

by Patrick Martin

13 March 2018

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2018/0 ... s-m13.html

Of course they'll continue to ignore what Martin reports the same way they'll continue to ignore what Ulfkotte reported. Watch this space.

The plain fact is, the Jerk and the Dreams just love the CIA whenever that repulsive criminal organisation happens to be furthering their own repulsive agenda.

[seemslikeadream]

you are hysterical

[seemslikeadream]

The main reason I no longer participate on RI as often as before is the almost constant onslaught of acrimony, accusation and antagonism towards the most prolific members by the least tolerant. The strength of RI has historically been its inclusiveness, diversity and wide tolerance of opposing views. In recent times, like the nation itself, RI has become a divided encampment of fixed fanatical extremes. Attempts at judiciously moderating the acrimony have themselves divided into opposing techniques.

What intrigued me about RI years ago was the number of independent thinkers, the astute analysts of dogma, the curious who explored the unexplained, the entertaining personalities that were unique, different minds. Yet the most appealing aspect of it was the group dynamics of mutual support and interest.

Jack, instead, seeks a board that reflects his own anti-imperialist convictions in a cult-like acquiescence to his views and his vision of a viable exchange of reinforcing, similar and supportive articles, arguments and archived political blogs. He resents and resists mainstream media and its messengers as propaganda from its duped propagandists. SLAD, AD and other long-term regulars here instead post more popular and prolific opinion pieces about current issues in the news, particularly of anti-fascist and left wing, democratic, populism persuasion. That riles Jack and his acolytes like BS, Mac, RocketMan and coffin-dodger who share anti-imperialist scorn.

So Jack’s sycophantic supporters follow and mirror his constant complaint about flooding the board with copy/pasted mainstream news and views, and his mean criticism of the regulars responsible for its reproduction on RI. Their own cult-like conformity to this caustic cause is a further disruptive diversion. Few older regulars remain to read through the diatribes of denigration and dismissal of the dissidents.

It’s like the emotional contagion in the psychographics that Cambridge Analytica tracked for Trump’s campaign and used to target, agitate and radicalize selected social media platform users into an angry antiestablishment fervor enough to vote in an idiot buffoon as POTUS. Only this time the negativists are all imitating Jack and seeking to turn RI into the loyal Marxist-Leninist anti-imperialism of a gulag encampment of mutual admirers.

In order to achieve obedient conformity, he must first eliminate the prolific posters of mainstream news, and particularly work with compromising and urging the board’s moderators to do his bidding. Failing that, he will campaign and complain to Jeff behind the screen on other sites. If all else fails he will threaten to quit in a snit.

I suggest that Jack, instead, take his finger out of his nose and/or his posterior orfice to simply scroll past whatever copy-pasted posts and content offends his delicate sensibilities and inspires his furious fixations.

[DrEvil]

What I'm wondering is, if this guy is spouting dumb-ass far right conspiracy theories left and right, why the hell would anyone take him seriously about anything? "All this terrible stuff he's saying is obviously horseshit, but this other thing he says which I agree with is totally true!" *

Isn't it possible to find a more reliable source who isn't also a complete fucking shithead?

* I do agree that the CIA is, to use Jerky's charming expression, balls deep in the mainstream media.

You just answered your own question, in the very same post where you asked it.

Here's another question: If you want a first-hand insider's account of the spooks' corrupting influence on the corporate media, who do you turn to?

Isn't it possible to find a more reliable source who isn't also a complete fucking shithead?

There are many other sources. I mentioned one of them upthread: Patrick Martin of the World Socialist Web Site (WSWS). ...snip...

The CIA takeover of the Democratic Party

by Patrick Martin

13 March 2018

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2018/0 ... s-m13.html

...snip...

Fair enough, and thanks for the Martin piece, I somehow missed that.

[MacCruiskeen]

Fine, Dr Evil. It's pleasant to have an exchange with someone who doesn't simply ignore any points actually made by his interlocutor. A discussion board might conceivably function that way.

Meanwhile, my prediction turned out correct, of course. Neither the Jerk nor the Dreams will ever acknowledge, much less discuss, Patrick Martin's article and the evidence he adduces therein. Instead those board-saboteurs prefer to flood the place with the latest turd-avalanche from that preposterous pillock peartreed.

What a team.