Page 47 of 71

Re: A Toast to Battered and Disapproved of Posters

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 2:31 am
by lupercal
Hugh Manatee Wins wrote:Glad to see a discussion of tobacco and the propaganda appeal to youth going on at my wake. That's the right focus. Priorities.
How could that be used to steer boys into risk-aversion, group identity in uniforms, paramilitarism, away from girlz, and on a path to military recruiting? right.

My permanent ban was changed to three weeks at some point. Sorry to disappoint some. Thanks for the affirmation of others.
I'll apologize to those who want to debate...sorry, did that for years and my time needs to go to my publisher and other outlets.
So I'm mostly asserting what I know for those who can get it point blank (pun intended on the anniversary of the CIA assassination of RFK).

I also observe spook media taking countermeasures against things revealed online and this is a way to gather evidence and learn their system's operational parameters. Alarmingly, some of the countermeasures are lethal. So I'm not inclined to see that happen anymore.

I'll let you know when you can buy my book or click on it.
Ciao for the moment.... (pun intended again)
:yay
Simulist wrote:This is like an after-game analysis after the game has already been analyzed to death.
:whistling:
peartreed wrote:Observe a dog with a bone. . . .
:doh:

Re: A Toast to Banned and Disappeared Posters

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 2:36 am
by lupercal
Hugh Manatee Wins wrote:Instantly I'm goaded and attacked ad-hominem as A DOG by username peartreed. Um, mods?
peartreed wrote:Observe a dog
More...pear-a-social-interaction...(1956)...looks pre-pear-ed for this moment....
peartreed wrote:"fresh meat, fat, sinew, marrow
dried, dead, barren fragments
Skeletal, diminished,
rejected, bypassed, replaced and abandoned."
Pfeh. Let us LEARN from this post. Just what is being used here to negate me?
Answerl: Implicit Association Theory.

https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/d ... tists.html
https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/d ... hrono.html

http://www.teachgreenpsych.com/cognition.php#implicit

I
mplicit Associations And Connectedness To Nature

Schultz, Shriver, Tabanico, and Khazian (2004) use a modification of the Implicit Associations Test to measure individuals' connection to nature. The task measures participants’ response latency in making “ me-not me” judgments for words associated with the natural environment (e. g., trees) versus words associated with the built environment (e. g., car). Shorter response latency for me-nature pairings is interpreted as reflecting greater implicit association (i. e., connection) between the self and the natural world. Importantly, researchers have not found the IAT to be a good predictor of environmental behaviors.
On the bright side, he hasn't started alliterating yet. . .

Re: A Toast to Banned and Disappeared Posters

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 2:38 am
by Nordic
Hugh is back?

So we were lied to?

What a sick fucking joke.

Guess I'm gone then.

Bye now.

Re: A Toast to Banned and Disappeared Posters

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 3:02 am
by lupercal
^ facebook awaits you bro :thumbsup

Re: A Toast to Banned and Disappeared Posters

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 6:35 am
by Jeff
You weren't lied to; you were told something believed to be true by an incompetent administrator. Apologies. Hugh is banned, and I've made certain of that.

Re: A Toast to Banned and Disappeared Posters

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 10:44 am
by Simulist
Venus makes its transit in front of the sun as our own resident zombie rises from the dead for a few hours to try and eat some brains again, and I miss it all…

Well. Given that my distraction was the undead of Bon Temps, I raise a glass of True Blood as a toast to Hugh.

Image

Re: A Toast to Banned and Disappeared Posters

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 12:41 pm
by crikkett
Simulist wrote:Venus makes its transit in front of the sun as our own resident zombie rises from the dead for a few hours to try and eat some brains again, and I miss it all…

Well. Given that my distraction was the undead of Bon Temps, I raise a glass of True Blood as a toast to Hugh.
Yippee it's back on! It must be summertime.
:partydance:

Re: A Toast to Banned and Disappeared Posters

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 12:47 pm
by Simulist
Actually, Season Five premiers on Sunday, June 10th. Last night, were watching our new Season Four discs.

(Alcide in high-def? Yeah, I'm down with that... ;) )

Re: A Toast to Banned and Disappeared Posters

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 2:33 pm
by sunny
Aww, you like that big dumb wolf? ;) He IS beautiful, I'll give him that.

Sorry Hugh. :(

Re: A Toast to Banned and Disappeared Posters

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 2:38 pm
by norton ash
Sexy vampires who talk like Foghorn Leghorn? Naahhh.

Even if Anna Paquin's from weird old Winnipeg.

Re: A Toast to Banned and Disappeared Posters

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 2:39 pm
by Simulist
sunny wrote:Aww, you like that big dumb wolf? ;) He IS beautiful, I'll give him that.
OH yeah. 8)

And Jason. (Who reminds me of a brick Stackhouse. :D )

As my writing amply demonstrates, I'm embarrassingly superficial.

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:57 pm
by Peregrine
Alright, I've not seen Plutonia around for a while. There's one I miss seeing post.

Re: A Toast to Banned and Disappeared Posters

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 11:32 pm
by freemason9
Wha, hugh was banned? holy crap! he WAS rigorous intuition!

see what happens when i'm not paying any mind

Re: A Toast to Banned and Disappeared Posters

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 11:38 pm
by Simulist
freemason9 wrote:Wha, hugh was banned? holy crap! he WAS rigorous intuition!
Hugh wasn't really very "rigorous," and he might have even thought "intuition" was woo.

Re: A Toast to Banned and Disappeared Posters

Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:24 am
by Nordic
Ok somebody got ahold of me and told me what was up. So i am back to apologize for the "we were lied to?" outburst.

I just freaked out at the zombie rising from the dead and ran for the hills.

Maybe zombies are people who have been banned from life.

Anyway just wanted to apologize for the outburst. I was thinking about it later and it just didn't fit that any of the mods would have been dishonest in ANY way, and with a calmer mind realized it must have been some kind of technical mistake.

Anyway thanks for inviting me back, that perspn who did so.