rigorousintuition.ca

justdrew wrote:Does anyone know what event this is...

All you need is love broadcast

whipstitch wrote:

looks like the 5th Beatle was late that day....

Hammer of Los wrote:
80 episodes? If I step in there I'll be falling for a while.

Well, each one is only about 5 to 9 minutes long, so not that time consuming.
As I've said before, they're kind of a combination of the video they find in "The Ring", and that bit in "The Simpsons" episode when Homer is accused of groping the baby-sitter, and he goes on "Rock Bottom" to explain himself, and they edit him to sound evil!

whipstitch wrote:Finally proof positive!

iamaphoney = Paul McCartney...

http://twitter.com/iamaphoney

Not on the twitter, so..... how?

Nordic wrote:

Here's that shot in the context of the video, showing that it's actually two different people, as opposed to just some studio trickery.

Uh .... in fact, in the video, it sure looks like "studio trickery" to me. Not even very well done. One of the faces is keyed in.

Justdrew, the car crash was supposedly on the 11th of September.

And Nordic, maybe it is studio trickery, and maybe it isn't. Neither one of us is going to prove it one way or another, however.

More importantly, though, are the slightly different noses, ears and sideburns of the two Pauls.

.

As I've said, either they're *really* different, or someone wanted us to think that they were. Either way, you've got to ask yourself why?

Why would Paul have put that tidbit into a Christmas video in 1979? With no fanfare, and no way for people to really analyze it, short of a VCR. Was it to sell more Beatles albums? I don't think so.

As Dylan once said: "Something is happening here, but you don't know what it is..."

And again, this isn't David Lee Roth, or Michael Stipe, or anyone else. It's ALWAYS Paul.

Here's a solo McCartney song from a few years ago with a very interesting title.

Ever Present Past.

And of course, the video features multiple Pauls. Again. This ties into what I consider to be the far more interesting angle, which is that Paul is being presented as twin gods or prophets, complete with death and rebirth imagery (more on this aspect later).



In apocryphal writings, the Apostle Thomas was the twin of Jesus. Thomas was also known as Jude.

Elijah and Enoch were twins.

Metatron and Sandalphon were twins.

Again, EVER PRESENT PAST.

There were two Pauls in the Yellow Submarine movie.

In Magical Mystery Tour, the Beatles are referred to as "four or five magicians".



During the I Am The Walrus performance in Magical Mystery Tour, Ringo's bass drum head has "Love the 3 Bealtes" painted on it (not to mention the golden spiral and the bloody shoes).



It goes on and on, but I have to go to work...

Bruce Dazzling wrote:

Nordic wrote:

Here's that shot in the context of the video, showing that it's actually two different people, as opposed to just some studio trickery.

Uh .... in fact, in the video, it sure looks like "studio trickery" to me. Not even very well done. One of the faces is keyed in.

Justdrew, the car crash was supposedly on the 11th of September.

confusion due to month/date order there? wiki says the storming out and car crash were on 9 November, 091166

I see F. Lee Bailey was involved in the early days of the myth. Today he's Chairman and CEO of IMPAC, Integrated Control Systems, Inc., a Florida corporation.

Celebrity lawyer F. Lee Bailey hosted an hour-long RKO television special in which he both prosecuted and defended the claims, cross-examining various "experts", including LaBour, leaving it to the viewer to decide. LaBour told Bailey during a pre-show meeting that he had made the whole thing up. Bailey responded, "Well, we have an hour of television to do. You're going to have to go along with this." The program aired locally in New York City on November 30, 1969, and was never re-aired.

That sure would be something to pull out of the archives... I wonder if it still exists?

Aiwass

NOT.. going to..look...into...this... life's TOO short.

The Beatles belong to history and I don't really care about McCartney anymore. I think this is a darkly amusing, elaborate, and long-standing ARG. Anyway, if it's all true, then I have a major bone to pick with the Royal Society, the Tavistock Institute, and Dr. John Dee, and only then would I consider 'Paul's death' in the context of the larger spectrum, in which it would be just one shifting psychedelic shade anyway.

Tell me lies, tell me sweet little lies... wait, that's Fleetwood Mac... MACcartney...

eye think Bruce is getting closer to the truth - strange how these things keep coming up -
pay no attention 2 the blue meanies, they don't know anything - take it away, Rupert!

norton ash wrote:NOT.. going to..look...into...this... life's TOO short.

HA! Yeah, that's exactly how I feel about it!

But ... it's ..... so ..... TEMPTING.

Nordic wrote:

norton ash wrote:NOT.. going to..look...into...this... life's TOO short.

HA! Yeah, that's exactly how I feel about it!

But ... it's ..... so ..... TEMPTING.

Like I said, it's kinda like "The Ring"... if you can waste 90min. on a horror movie, you can see couple of these...right?

justdrew wrote:

Bruce Dazzling wrote:

Nordic wrote:

Here's that shot in the context of the video, showing that it's actually two different people, as opposed to just some studio trickery.

Uh .... in fact, in the video, it sure looks like "studio trickery" to me. Not even very well done. One of the faces is keyed in.

Justdrew, the car crash was supposedly on the 11th of September.

confusion due to month/date order there? wiki says the storming out and car crash were on 9 November, 091166

I see F. Lee Bailey was involved in the early days of the myth. Today he's Chairman and CEO of IMPAC, Integrated Control Systems, Inc., a Florida corporation.

Celebrity lawyer F. Lee Bailey hosted an hour-long RKO television special in which he both prosecuted and defended the claims, cross-examining various "experts", including LaBour, leaving it to the viewer to decide. LaBour told Bailey during a pre-show meeting that he had made the whole thing up. Bailey responded, "Well, we have an hour of television to do. You're going to have to go along with this." The program aired locally in New York City on November 30, 1969, and was never re-aired.

That sure would be something to pull out of the archives... I wonder if it still exists?

Sadly, the F. Lee Bailey video no longer exists, justdrew.

As for the date mix up for the car crash, the November 9 date was also derived from the mirrored bass drum on the Pepper cover, but the November 9 interpretation doesn't take the European date parlance into account, and also doesn't jibe with Paul and Mal's Kenya safari, with the sudden change in Paul's appearance in Kenya, as demonstrated in the strange photos I posted.

And according to the Beatles Monthly fanzine of Feb 1967, there was yet another car crash rumor:

"Stories about the Beatles are always flying around Fleet Street. The 7th of January was very icy, with dangerous conditions on the M1 motorway, linking London with the Midlands, and towards the end of the day, a rumor swept London that Paul McCartney had been killed in a car crash on the M1. But, of course, there was absolutely no truth in it at all. As the Beatles' Press Officer found out, when he telephoned Paul's St. John's Wood home and was answered by Paul himself, that he had been at home all day with his black Mini Cooper safely locked up in the garage."

So, there are lots of conflicting stories floating around about this one (non?) event.

As for this...

streeb wrote:

Aiwass

All I can say is well played, streeb. That's one of many Crowley/ancient Egypt connections.

For those who aren't aware, Aleister Crowley claimed to have written The Book of the Law in a fit of automatic writing while visiting the great pyramids in 1904. He claimed that the book was dictated to him by the spirit Aiwass, who was the messenger of Horus.



Meanwhile, McCartney's logo..



And deeper down we go...

Bruce Dazzling wrote:[

Justdrew, the car crash was supposedly on the 11th of September.

confusion due to month/date order there? wiki says the storming out and car crash were on 9 November, 091166

And deeper down we go...[/quote]
Steeped in some truth.... I believe Paul had some sort of moped accident.... not only did it chip a tooth, (SEE "PAPERBACK WRITER" video), which may have spurred on the growing of a mustache.... maybe?

vince wrote:

Bruce Dazzling wrote:[

Justdrew, the car crash was supposedly on the 11th of September.

confusion due to month/date order there? wiki says the storming out and car crash were on 9 November, 091166

And deeper down we go...

Steeped in some truth.... I believe Paul had some sort of moped accident.... not only did it chip a tooth, (SEE "PAPERBACK WRITER" video), which may have spurred on the growing of a mustache.... maybe?

Paul definitely had a moped accident on January 26, 1965. He was riding with the Guinness heir, Tara Browne, when it happened.



The REALLY strange thing about this is that when Lennon and McCartney were asked about the inspiration for the lyrics to A Day in the Life, they said that it was written about the car crash of "the Guinness heir", which occurred on December 18, 1966. At no point did they mention that Paul was good enough friends with "the Guinness heir" to have been riding mopeds with him a year and a half prior to Browne's tragic car accident that moved them to write the song.

Again, IT JUST MAKES NO SENSE.

There aren't many photos available of Tara Browne.

Here's one.



And here's another (center of back seat) where he looks more than a little bit like Paul.



Here's another Paulish photo (Tara is on the right).

Can we at least post a 'may be triggering' warning for people whose first LSD experience was inextricably intertwined with the Beatles? Because you are all blowing my mind, man.