Biscuit crumbs
Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
- BrandonD
- Posts: 768
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 2:05 am
- spambot: no
Re: Biscuit crumbs
The sun is exactly 400 times the size of the moon.
The distance of the sun from the earth is exactly 400 times the distance of the moon from the earth.
Because of this, both celestial bodies are exactly the same size visually, from the perspective of the earth - and the moon precisely overlaps the sun during an eclipse.
The time taken for the moon to orbit the earth (approx 29.5 days) is exactly the same time it takes for the moon to rotate on its own axis.
Because of this, the same face of the moon is always facing the earth.
This is all information that most of you are probably already aware of, but just wanted to reiterate these pretty wild coincidences.
The distance of the sun from the earth is exactly 400 times the distance of the moon from the earth.
Because of this, both celestial bodies are exactly the same size visually, from the perspective of the earth - and the moon precisely overlaps the sun during an eclipse.
The time taken for the moon to orbit the earth (approx 29.5 days) is exactly the same time it takes for the moon to rotate on its own axis.
Because of this, the same face of the moon is always facing the earth.
This is all information that most of you are probably already aware of, but just wanted to reiterate these pretty wild coincidences.
"One measures a circle, beginning anywhere." -Charles Fort
- BrandonD
- Posts: 768
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 2:05 am
- spambot: no
Re:
These strike me as shallow, poorly-reasoned theories that are easily disproven. I wonder if people who make these kind of theories are involved in field research at all.§ê¢rꆧ » Thu Oct 08, 2009 11:46 am wrote: Some scientists believe we dream to fix experiences in long-term memory, that is, we dream about things worth remembering. Others reckon we dream about things worth forgetting - to eliminate overlapping memories that would otherwise clog up our brains.
"One measures a circle, beginning anywhere." -Charles Fort
-
KUAN
- Posts: 889
- Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2011 5:17 am
- spambot: no
Re: Biscuit crumbs
What else have they lied to us about fer G-D's sake???????
Camels cast doubt on accuracy of Bible stories
Camels cast doubt on accuracy of Bible stories
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/ar ... d=11197092Camels are mentioned in Biblical stories involving Abraham, Joseph and Jacob as well as other famous characters.
But archaeologists have found that the mammals were not domesticated in Israel until centuries after famous figures were said to have ridden them.
They claim this shows that text in the Bible was compiled long after the events described in it and challenges the holy book as a historical document.
Camels were not domesticated in Israel until centuries after the Age of the Patriarchs - when Abraham, Jacob and Issac are said to have lived - between 2,000 and 1,500 BC.
Dr Erez Ben-Yosef and Dr Lidar Sapir-Hen of Tel Aviv University's Department of Archaeology and Near Eastern Cultures used radiocarbon dating to pinpoint the moment when domesticated camels arrived in the southern Levant.
They found camels came in the 9th century BC, not the 12th as previously thought.
- Luther Blissett
- Posts: 4994
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:31 pm
- Location: Philadelphia
Re: Biscuit crumbs
from "Gossips, Gorgons, & Crones: the Fates of the Earth", pp 253-254.Jane Caputi wrote:Atomic veterans who witnessed the U.S. above-ground tests in the 1950s testified 'that they saw both animals and humans chained in cages close to ground zero.' These caged beings were literally sacrificed to the death-machine god, yet this horrific incident represents only the most overt form of such ritual sacrifice. The consumer society aggrandizes elite men as the godlike creators of godlike machines. Simultaneously, it demands that human bodies-- primarily those of the poor-- and, in even greater abandon, plant mineral, and animal bodies be sacrificed to them.
The Rich and the Corporate remain in their hundred-year fever visions of Bolsheviks taking their stuff - JackRiddler
- Luther Blissett
- Posts: 4994
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:31 pm
- Location: Philadelphia
Re: Biscuit crumbs
I was doing some followup on Duncan/Blake only to find that the waters in which one has to dive to read about DreamsEnd's writing have been completely muddied by the fame of a "Bachelorette" contestant with whom he shares a name.
The Rich and the Corporate remain in their hundred-year fever visions of Bolsheviks taking their stuff - JackRiddler
- JackRiddler
- Posts: 16007
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
- Location: New York City
Re: Biscuit crumbs
None of this is so.BrandonD » Tue Feb 04, 2014 2:08 pm wrote:The sun is exactly 400 times the size of the moon. The distance of the sun from the earth is exactly 400 times the distance of the moon from the earth.
The sun's estimated mass is approximately 27 million times that of the earth's moon. It is more than 1,100 times the mass of Jupiter. (Jupiter's mass is 2.5 greater than that of all the other planets in this system combined.)
The sun's diameter according to our measurement is 402 times that of the moon. That's a measuring of the visible solar surface, the chromosphere, although of course the star is a process, from a fusion core generating photons out to a solar wind or atmosphere extending for a theorized 2 light years on the plane of its equator. The light in the sky is also the sun, it touches us. Present theory holds it can take 10,000 earth-years or many times that for light generated in the sun's core to reach the chromosphere and be released into space.
The distance of the earth from the sun in its current orbit varies between 92 and 94 million miles, thus by more than 2 million miles a year, since the orbits of the planets are elliptical. The variance alone is about 9 times greater than the earth's current average distance to the moon, which also varies. Thus one can never speak of an "exact" ratio of the earth's distance from the moon as opposed to from the sun.
The two bodies are frequently seen by the naked eye as having approximately the same size in earth's sky. This nevertheless varies greatly depending on one's latitude, the locations of the bodies in their orbits, and local atmospheric conditions. Even in perfectly aligned solar eclipses the moon might be smaller in the sky and fail to fully overlap the sun. These are called annular eclipses.Because of this, both celestial bodies are exactly the same size visually, from the perspective of the earth - and the moon precisely overlaps the sun during an eclipse.

"The next total solar eclipse visible from the United States will occur on August 21, 2017."A special case of a solar eclipse is known as an annular eclipse. This occurs when the Moon is farther from the Earth than normal, and hence its apparent size is not quite sufficient to cover the Sun completely. Therefore, even though the Sun- Moon alignment is perfect, the Moon will appear slightly smaller in diameter than the Sun and a thin ring of sunlight will remain visible around the dark silhouette of the Moon. The name annular eclipse comes from the Latin annulus, meaning ring.
The United States, of course, like all nations and many other forms of social structure, is an imaginary concept made real through shared belief in its existence.
- BrandonD
- Posts: 768
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 2:05 am
- spambot: no
Re: Biscuit crumbs
Makes sense. Another lesson to question information gleaned from wikipedia, I suppose.JackRiddler » Fri Aug 01, 2014 1:38 pm wrote: The distance of the earth from the sun in its current orbit varies between 92 and 94 million miles, thus by more than 2 million miles a year, since the orbits of the planets are elliptical.
"One measures a circle, beginning anywhere." -Charles Fort
- stefano
- Posts: 2672
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:50 pm
Re: Biscuit crumbs
It is not clear how strictly the content of foreign programmes shown online [in China] will be vetted. But the regulator’s call for “healthy, well-made” works which “showcase good values” seems to echo a recent tightening of controls on terrestrial TV. These include bans on dramas dealing with topics such as superstition, espionage and—bizarrely—time travel.
- Luther Blissett
- Posts: 4994
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:31 pm
- Location: Philadelphia
Re: Biscuit crumbs
Linked from Rocket Man's recent post about a structure beneath the surface of the moon:
Saturn Mystery As 100-Mile 'Shape' Evolves Before Scientists' Eyes On Titan
Saturn Mystery As 100-Mile 'Shape' Evolves Before Scientists' Eyes On Titan
The Rich and the Corporate remain in their hundred-year fever visions of Bolsheviks taking their stuff - JackRiddler
-
KUAN
- Posts: 889
- Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2011 5:17 am
- spambot: no
Re: Biscuit crumbs
Call me superficial but Mick Hucknall richer than Bernie Taupin? omygodlaughoutloudfuckmedeadupyanosehelpmeican'tmakebymyselfoyeahThe full list of The Sunday Times's Top 50 music millionaires, listing Britain and Ireland's richest performers and composers.
1. Sir Paul McCartney and Nancy Shevell £760 million
2. Lord Lloyd-Webber £715 million
3. U2 £500 million
4. Sir Elton John £280 million
5. Sir Mick Jagger £235 million
6. Olivia and Dhani Harrison £220 million
6. Keith Richards £220 million
8. Ringo Starr £200 million
9. Michael Flatley £198 million
10. Sting £185 million
11. Eric Clapton £160 million
11. Rod Stewart £160 million
11. Roger Waters £160 million
14. Sir Tom Jones £155 million
15. Sir Tim Rice £150 million
16. Robbie Williams £145 million
17. Ozzy and Sharon Osbourne £135 million
18. Brian May £120 million
18. Charlie Watts £120 million
20. Roger Taylor £115 million
21. Phil Collins £110 million
22. George Michael £105 million
22. Jimmy Page £105 million
24. Robert Plant £103 million
25. John Deacon £100 million
25. David Gilmour £100 million
27. Calvin Harris £95 million
28. Enya £91 million
29. Iman Abdulmajid and Duncan Jones and family £90 million
30. Adele £85 million
31. Gary Barlow £75 million
31. Mark Knopfler £75 million
31. Nick Mason £75 million
31. Pete Townshend £75 million
35. Engelbert Humperdinck £70 million
36. Noel and Liam Gallagher £65 million
36. Brian Johnson £65 million
36. Chris Martin £65 million
39. Barry Gibb £60 million
39. John Paul Jones £60 million
41. Sir Cliff Richard £58 million
42. Guy Berryman £55 million
42. Jonny Buckland £55 million
42. Will Champion £55 million
42. Kylie Minogue £55 million
42. Ronnie Wood £55 million
47. Jay Kay £50 million
47. Sir Van Morrison £50 million
49. Peter Gabriel £45 million
49. Mick Hucknall £45 million
49. Ed Sheeran £45 million
49. Bernie Taupin £45 million
- 82_28
- Posts: 11194
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
- Location: North of Queen Anne
- Contact:
Re: Biscuit crumbs
Where the hell is Bono in that or is his real name something else?
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
- 82_28
- Posts: 11194
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
- Location: North of Queen Anne
- Contact:
Re: Biscuit crumbs
Bono:
$600 million
Other companies where Elevation Partners has a share include Forbes, Yelp and MarketShare. Despite the huge amount, Bono is still not the richest musician alive, contrary to popular reports. PlayBack.fm reports that Bono is the eighth wealthiest music artist with a net worth of $600 million (AU$843 million).Sep 2, 2015
$600 million
Other companies where Elevation Partners has a share include Forbes, Yelp and MarketShare. Despite the huge amount, Bono is still not the richest musician alive, contrary to popular reports. PlayBack.fm reports that Bono is the eighth wealthiest music artist with a net worth of $600 million (AU$843 million).Sep 2, 2015
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
-
KUAN
- Posts: 889
- Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2011 5:17 am
- spambot: no
Re: Biscuit crumbs
.
and whadabout sting - as big a pratt as bono by the sounds... http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/m ... -gutseriev
and whadabout sting - as big a pratt as bono by the sounds... http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/m ... -gutseriev
Wedding singer Sting witnesses that the Russians love their children too