rigorousintuition.ca

but at least we know what we're getting with him.

REALLY?

how do you know that?

and I am waiting patiently for the Trump and RNC leaks

seemslikeadream » 10 Dec 2016 14:45 wrote:

but at least we know what we're getting with him.

REALLY?

how do you know that?

and I am waiting patiently for the Trump and RNC leaks

http://www.mostdamagingwikileaks.com/

See the Top 100 list. Most of them are indexed/sourced with a Wikileaks ID. I'll admit that some of them are sufficiently out-of-context that they may have different interpretations (a few of them are worthy of , e.g. #6) but a great many of them speak for themselves. The woman is an utter sociopath.

Trump's abominations don't need to be leaked. They are all right there out in the open.

Trump's abominations don't need to be leaked. They are all right there out in the open.

that's absolutely ridicules ..you know nothing about Trump's holdings around the world or who he does business with ..you know nothing about him

We know enough about Trump to think he's awful. If there is any hidden information that would change my mind about him, it would be in the positive direction. All of the data that is available is damning.

On the other hand, unless he were directly involved in pizzagate, and it could be proven conclusively, no additional information would cause Trumpets to change their mind about him.

I don't know what you want. It seems like you want everybody to fall over and think Clinton is wonderful and that there is a vast right wing Russian conspiracy against her. Not going to happen. She is her own worst propaganda.

that is absolutely false ...where did you get that idea? Why are you making shit up?

On the other hand, unless he were directly involved in pizzagate

how do you know that?

It seems like you want everybody to fall over and think Clinton is wonderful

that's insane where did you get that idea?

Then please tell us what your objective is. You keep talking insinuating that WL is biased. Yes, it probably is. So what? How does that change things? Forgive me if you've already stated your objectives, but I haven't read them or I have not committed them to memory.

this thread has nothing to do with Clinton

there's another thread for that

this is about Trump and Russia

seemslikeadream » 10 Dec 2016 15:17 wrote:this thread has nothing to do with Clinton

OK. The 2016 election has nothing to do with Clinton. OK.

this thread is about Trump and Russia

OK, are you going to answer my question here or on another thread? Or are you just going to deflect because you don't actually have an objective other than to emote about the election and the sorry-ass state of American politics?

oh sorry I'm not into your pizza gate emote sorry-ass shit

my objective is to follow Trump and his fucking ass until he is impeached

that's so very clear I don't understand why you're even asking

OK, glad to know you have one. I'm not too happy about Trump either, but consider what you get if Trump is impeached. President Pence!! That's a win for you, eh?

first things first ..then I will move on to Pence....maybe Wikileaks could leak something on him...oh wait they don't do Repubs do they?

But honestly, SLAD, I don't think we can have much of a productive conversation right now. You're too angry. Maybe rightfully so, the whole last month has been shocking for everybody. But I think you're attacking people here needlessly. At least me, anyway. I have found many of the articles you've linked here to be interesting and even valuable, but the last few months have seemed to put some stress on you, from my perspective anyway.

I know a few people attacked you here in a way that was quite uncalled for. I was not one of them.

I'm not attacking you ..I take exception to your baseless assumptions about me ..that's all