rigorousintuition.ca

This is from the truthseeker...there is also discussion on the shootings at Canary Wharf....<br><br><br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/flash/londonbombings.html">www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/...bings.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i></i>

Pam,<br>She's pretty convincing isn't she? There is no way that interview was faked or scripted.<br>But she's scared.<br>Nobody wants to get involved, just like Canary Wharf.<br>I don't expect we are going to hear very much more about 7/7 from the mainstream. It's going to all be the 21/7 plotters.<br><br>For example, have you seen that the Brits are not interested in the man identified as the ringleader? The man identified by John Loftus as the MI6 agent will be extradited to the States (the story, from the Independent, is on that thread). <p></p><i></i>

<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rolleyes --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/eyes.gif ALT=":rolleyes"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>Not buying it. The fact that she knows about the supposed Canary Wharf shooting and read it "on a web site" puts her far too close to our side of the fence for her to be the harmless observer that we're supposed to believe her to be. The Canary Wharf shooting is not a a detail that the average Brit bystander will have just happened upon. You have to be looking for it. <br><br>Happy to be convinced otherwise but majorly skeptical for now. <p></p><i></i>

Well, I wasn't looking for the Wharf story, it came up on a MSM site, New Zealand Herald I believe. Is everyone who came across the story now less than a "harmless observer". <br>Stay skeptical, file it don't trash it.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>