Fuck Obama

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Postby chlamor » Sat Jul 04, 2009 4:41 pm

Obama Administration Keeps Coal Ash Storage Sites Secret
Thursday June 18, 2009

When the government starts doing things for our own good but keeping the details secret, it’s time for all Americans to start watching their backs.

As of last week, the Obama administration is refusing to make public the location of 44 hazardous coal ash storage sites in 26 states that pose a danger to people living nearby—a move that has put the White House at odds with some of its strongest supporters on Capitol Hill and in the environmental community.

The Obama administration says the coal ash storage sites must remain secret for the sake of national security. Officials claim that secrecy is the only way to avoid making the hazardous waste sites potential targets of terrorist attacks that could spread the dangerous mix of arsenic, heavy metals and other toxins to local communities and water supplies.

The dangers of coal ash waste were brought to public attention in December [2008], when a storage pond at a Tennessee power plant was breached and the poisonous sludge buried a town, contaminated nearby rivers and streams, and created an environmental disaster 100 times the size of the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Following that spill, the EPA classified 44 other coal ash storage sites as potential hazards to U.S. communities—a designation that means the hazardous waste sites could cause death and serious property damage in the event of a spill.

Yet, the locations of Superfund sites and nuclear power plants are well known and are not treated as national security concerns that require government secrecy and public ignorance. So why this sudden need to protect the American people by keeping us all in the dark about a nationwide collection of hazardous coal ash waste sites that could destroy our homes, damage our health, or even take our lives?

The Knox group of newspapers in Tennessee suggested strongly that the government may be more concerned with protecting itself instead of its citizens: "These waste sites may be environmental and health hazards. But they are unlikely terror targets. As the muckety-mucks in Washington know, the real danger of disclosure is from angry Americans. If citizens realize they are downstream from fragile mountains of gunk, they will demand action and accountability."

Some environmentalists have raised an even more troubling question of environmental justice.

"We know that there are no coal ash sites in Manhattan. So where are these sites?" said Virginia Cramer of the Sierra Club in a statement. "They are generally in low-income and minority communities, so we are concerned about those communities knowing what types of dangers are surrounding them."

All of this runs counter to President Obama’s promise to promote greater openness in government.

"For a long time now, there's been too much secrecy in this city," Obama said in a speech to government staff on his first day as president. "That era is now over. Starting today, every agency and department should know that this administration stands on the side not of those who seek to withhold information but those who seek to make it known."

http://environment.about.com/b/2009/06/ ... secret.htm
Liberal thy name is hypocrisy. What's new?
chlamor
 
Posts: 2173
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 11:26 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby 8bitagent » Sun Jul 05, 2009 2:06 am

freemason9 wrote:I don't think you have much to worry about, chlamor. Between the fringe left and right wings, he's rapidly losing his popularity. The right wing is screaming "socialist," and the left wing is screaming "conservative." I now have doubts that Americans can manage to obtain even a modest national health care system (which is the very foundation of an economically free society).

I predict that you will get your wish, chlamor, and Obama's popularity will slide. Say hello to President Romney in 2012.


Why dont the right wing Sarah Palin/Rush/Fox News people wake up and see how much of the Obama agenda fits with the Bush agenda?

They should be WORSHIPPING Obama
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12244
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby 2012 Countdown » Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:24 pm

White House opposes increased CIA oversight; House intel chairman says CIA lied to Congress
BY DANIEL TENCER

Published: July 8, 2009
Updated 6 hours ago
In another sign of an increasingly secretive White House, the Obama administration has threatened to veto an intelligence-services spending bill because it would increase the number of Congresspeople who would have to be informed of the activities of agencies such as the CIA.

On Wednesday, it emerged that House Intelligence Chairperson Sylvestre Reyes alleged in a letter that the CIA had misinformed Congress on unspecified issues having to do with the spy agency’s activities.

Reyes and his fellow Democrats had been prepared to debate Thursday a bill that would significantly expand Congressional oversight of the 16 agencies that carry out intelligence services for the US government. (Details of the bill follow below.)

The bill would expand the number of Congresspeople informed of the most sensitive intelligence activities from the current eight to around 40, AP reports.

But according to the Hill, “if the intelligence authorization bill contains language broadening who the president must inform on covert activities, President Obama would be advised to veto the bill.”

ORIGINAL ARTICLE FOLLOWS

A leading House Democrat has added his voice to a growing chorus of accusations that the CIA has been misleading members of Congress over its activities.

In a letter made public by the Congressional Quarterly today, House Intelligence Chairperson Silvestre Reyes (D-TX) told the ranking Republican on the Intelligence Committee that CIA Director Leon Panetta had disclosed recently that his agency may have misled Congress in some of its reports to the committee.

Reyes’ letter disclosed no details about the alleged misinformation, likely due to national-security restrictions.

Panetta’s disclosures “have led me to conclude this committee has been misled, has not been provided full and complete notifications, and (in at least one occasion) was affirmatively lied to,” Reyes wrote to Rep. Peter Hoekstra (R-MI).

The House Intelligence Committee is currently deliberating an intelligence appropriations bill that would increase Congressional oversight of the CIA and other national-security agencies.

The new law would make the positions of NSA director and general counsel subject to Congressional approval. It would also create oversight officers at the NSA and the Office of the Director of Central Intelligence, who would have the power to investigate all 16 intelligence agencies and could not be fired by the heads of the CIA or NSA.

The new law would also require the CIA to videotape interrogations.

Additionally, the power to decide when the CIA briefs the full intelligence committee, and when it briefs only a select few members of Congress, would be given to Congress, rather than resting with the executive branch as is currently the case.

GOP: THE REAL ISSUE IS PELOSI

But Republicans on the committee have shown little desire for greater oversight of the US’s national security agencies, and instead appear focused on the issue of what House Majority Leader Nancy Pelosi knew about the CIA’s use of waterboarding, and when she knew it.

In May, Pelosi admitted that she had been told by the CIA in 2003 of waterboarding, but accused the agency of misleading her and other members of Congress about the technique and its uses. Other Congressional Democrats also accused the CIA of misleading them.

Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee had added a clause to the appropriations bill that would have required an investigation into Pelosi’s claims about waterboarding, but the Democratic majority shot it down.

Republicans are now accusing Rep. Reyes of attempting to deflect attention from Pelosi by writing a letter to Rep. Hoekstra, which then became public.

“We’re not going to respond to something so unprofessional as a letter that was slipped under the Republican staff director’s door after hours after everyone had gone home for the night,” Jamal Ware, a spokesman for Hoekstra, told the Congressional Quarterly. “It’s been two weeks since this [notification from Panetta] happened, per their letter, and they’ve not tried to have any conversations with the ranking member.”


http://rawstory.com/08/news/2009/07/08/ ... -congress/
User avatar
2012 Countdown
 
Posts: 2293
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 1:27 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby sunny » Sat Jul 11, 2009 11:05 am

Choose love
sunny
 
Posts: 5220
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Alabama
Blog: View Blog (1)

Postby agitprop » Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:32 pm

Nordic wrote:

When in reality the right-wing is Obama and the entire Obama administration, and everything about it. It's a brilliant bluff, really, a fascinating con job, where the feint, the distraction, is that the right-wingers are all pissed off, spitting curses in their corner, having had their asses handed to them, when in fact they are still running things behind the Obama halloween mask.

Crazy shit.

I really wish I could just ignore it all and go about my merry way and make a lot of money and just say "fuck all these stupid fuckers" and take their money somehow. I mean, why not?

What's that old saying about "it's immoral to let a sucker keep his money?" or something to that affect?


Very true. In the US, you have the far right, period. It's very much good cop, bad cop. The repuglicans are the exposed fist with brass knuckles. The Dems have one hand in a velvet glove, patting their constituents on the head, while telling them scary stories about the bad cop. Behind the one way mirror, they're all high fiving.
agitprop
 
Posts: 258
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 5:51 pm
Location: canada
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby ninakat » Sat Jul 11, 2009 2:22 pm



Thanks sunny. This appointment speaks for itself. The subject deserves its own thread even.
User avatar
ninakat
 
Posts: 2904
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:38 pm
Location: "Nothing he's got he really needs."
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Sweejak » Sat Jul 11, 2009 2:58 pm



What happened to Obama's much discussed and thorough vetting process? Little Eichmann's indeed!

I have not read his book, so is he advocating this or just offering a scenario?

Isn't it odd that when the earth had far fewer people that it seems that there was still poverty, authoritarianism, totalitarianism, and all the rest. And have you noticed that these ideas always seem to come from the upper class and often from the wealthiest nations. Aren't they the ones who are holding secret meetings.

If only we kill enough people we can all have a better life! I know population can't expand forever, when and where have populations expanded endlessly? No where. I'd rather starve than give this kind of technocratic power over the people to anyone. Give it some time though, slowly thru the media, thru various stories and memes this will all become a normal idea. It'll be the cold, hard truth, the truth you must accept. Your choices will be mass killing of people or mass sterilization. Do the right thing!

When sperm counts finally go to zero will you be able to afford government created sperm? Which brand? Can you really afford to rent that Ford womb?

Well, maybe they're right. Should I take myself out voluntarily or should I first take as many of them out as I can.

Decisions decisions.
User avatar
Sweejak
 
Posts: 3250
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 7:40 pm
Location: Border Region 5
Blog: View Blog (0)

Good luck to these people who are trying to do good things

Postby Corvidaerex » Sun Jul 12, 2009 1:16 am

I've been very happy with the Obama administration so far. And most voters seem to be with him, despite the weird foaming on the far right and the "you're not doing enough for me NOW" on the far left.

Little things are important. Appearances are important. The Obama family is setting a tone that is quite lovely and encouraging, just by being the Obama family. Do any of you know what it means to black people and Native Americans and our many "minority" ethnic groups in this country to see a happy, successful and loving family of color in the *white* house?

If we could focus our attention on just these past five months, we would be amazed to see the scope and reach of this new American government, how swiftly so many taboo (to the GOP leadership of 2001-2006 and the Bush administration) subjects have been brought to the Oval Office in the form of new executive orders and new congressional legislation.

Stem cell research, immediately stopping the torture, accepting California's mileage standards as the nation's (rather than suing California to stop those state environmental standards), halting a huge pile of last-minute destructive Bush Administration environmental policies, restoring foreign aid to family planning groups, overturning the anti equal-pay decision, authorizing the SCHIP health insurance for poor kids, dealt in a wise and adult way with threats/incidents from North Korea and Iran, is dealing with a wise and forward-looking way at Israel v. Palestine, has tremendously changed the world view of America (anybody catch that visit to Ghana today?), has launched an incredibly ambitious alternative-energy policy that is happening right now (especially in the Southwest, with solar and wind and geothermal), and is walking an intentionally non-confrontational line to get gays accepted in the military and actual health care for all Americans.

Scientists are thrilled with this presidency. Poets and artists are thrilled. Even proponents of organic farming and home gardens are thrilled.

We poison ourselves by listening to the fringe complainers about everything, and the entertainment/excitement broadcast news based on cheap daily thrills. The beloved Vietnamese peace activist and Zen monk Thich Nhat Hahn said very clearly in a recent podcast that Barack Obama is of the sangha, the community of people who aspire to live in calm yet engaged mindfulness with the world, who walk in peace upon the Earth.

Why did Thich Nhat Hahn say this? Because he sees in Obama a child of East meets West, black meets white, and a calm approach to the usual furious yelling of American politics. I too feel something encouraging and peaceful, despite all of our many many problems.

Is it *helping* any of us, in our hearts, to immediately be so crazily condemning a new leadership -- one WE elected, with great fanfare -- as it launches so many bold new moves, even during an economic crisis rooted in the old greed?

Barack Obama is a man, with faults, but with a good heart and a wise intellect. His team is made up of people from America, on Earth -- they may be great or so-so, but they're products of our time, as we are, as you are. The sense I get, as they walk strongly at times and stumble through compromise most of the time, is that they are not plotting *against* us, and by "us" I mean everybody, every creature.

We all spent eight years screaming about George W. Bush. Do we really want to spend the *next* eight years screaming about somebody we elected to un-do the errors of the past?
Corvidaerex
 
Posts: 252
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 4:51 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Good luck to these people who are trying to do good thin

Postby Nordic » Sun Jul 12, 2009 1:33 am

Corvidaerex wrote:I've been very happy with the Obama administration so far. And most voters seem to be with him, despite the weird foaming on the far right and the "you're not doing enough for me NOW" on the far left.

Little things are important. Appearances are important. The Obama family is setting a tone that is quite lovely and encouraging, just by being the Obama family. Do any of you know what it means to black people and Native Americans and our many "minority" ethnic groups in this country to see a happy, successful and loving family of color in the *white* house?

If we could focus our attention on just these past five months, we would be amazed to see the scope and reach of this new American government, how swiftly so many taboo (to the GOP leadership of 2001-2006 and the Bush administration) subjects have been brought to the Oval Office in the form of new executive orders and new congressional legislation.

Stem cell research, immediately stopping the torture, accepting California's mileage standards as the nation's (rather than suing California to stop those state environmental standards), halting a huge pile of last-minute destructive Bush Administration environmental policies, restoring foreign aid to family planning groups, overturning the anti equal-pay decision, authorizing the SCHIP health insurance for poor kids, dealt in a wise and adult way with threats/incidents from North Korea and Iran, is dealing with a wise and forward-looking way at Israel v. Palestine, has tremendously changed the world view of America (anybody catch that visit to Ghana today?), has launched an incredibly ambitious alternative-energy policy that is happening right now (especially in the Southwest, with solar and wind and geothermal), and is walking an intentionally non-confrontational line to get gays accepted in the military and actual health care for all Americans.

Scientists are thrilled with this presidency. Poets and artists are thrilled. Even proponents of organic farming and home gardens are thrilled.

We poison ourselves by listening to the fringe complainers about everything, and the entertainment/excitement broadcast news based on cheap daily thrills. The beloved Vietnamese peace activist and Zen monk Thich Nhat Hahn said very clearly in a recent podcast that Barack Obama is of the sangha, the community of people who aspire to live in calm yet engaged mindfulness with the world, who walk in peace upon the Earth.

Why did Thich Nhat Hahn say this? Because he sees in Obama a child of East meets West, black meets white, and a calm approach to the usual furious yelling of American politics. I too feel something encouraging and peaceful, despite all of our many many problems.

Is it *helping* any of us, in our hearts, to immediately be so crazily condemning a new leadership -- one WE elected, with great fanfare -- as it launches so many bold new moves, even during an economic crisis rooted in the old greed?

Barack Obama is a man, with faults, but with a good heart and a wise intellect. His team is made up of people from America, on Earth -- they may be great or so-so, but they're products of our time, as we are, as you are. The sense I get, as they walk strongly at times and stumble through compromise most of the time, is that they are not plotting *against* us, and by "us" I mean everybody, every creature.

We all spent eight years screaming about George W. Bush. Do we really want to spend the *next* eight years screaming about somebody we elected to un-do the errors of the past?


You have got to be shitting me. Is this post snark?

Here is the one Big Fucking Strawman I am so tired of seeing:


the "you're not doing enough for me NOW" on the far left.


That is such fucking bullshit, and the fact that you used it in very nearly your first sentence tells me that I probably shouldn't be wasting my breath talking to you.

But that is a fucking strawman and if you were actually paying attention you would KNOW IT.

Obama got into office by promising to be different and by promising to give us "hope" (which is a joke, because the only "hope" he gave us is the same "hope" you get when you buy another worthless lotto ticket).

He has given lipservice to a few very minor things in order to put up the appearances of "change." They are ALL business-friendly. Beyond that he has done nothing but continue the policies of the Bush Administration.

Are you paying attention? Do you realize that he "eliminated" mountaintop removal mining in the Appalacias by CHANGING ITS NAME? So we no longer have "mountaintop removal mining", oh no! It's great THAT no longer exists. But what we DO have is dozens more of these projects, exactly like the old ones, approved by the Obama administration, with a NEW NAME.

This is exactly like Bush's "healthy forests" initiative and the "clear skies" initiative.

Pure Orwellian horse-shit.

And people like you eat it all up. Because you are NOT paying attention. You instead got hornswaggled up with the rest of the masses, watching this admittedly charismatic and charming and black (gasp! a black man! That's GOTTA be progress!) entertainer, this PR front for the same old cabal of business interests condition you into thinking otherwise, using the most sophisticated media marketing devices known to history.

Did no you notice that he ramped up an unnecessary and illegal war in Afghanistan, against a people who never attacked us, and that we are now losing servicemen, again, daily, and that he has increased military spending to absurdly mindboggling levels? Did you notice that the torture did not end, it just changed addresses and is now being conducted elsewhere? Did no notice that we're not leaving Iraq, contrary to his campaign promises, and are just settling into our huge, cushy and PERMANENT military bases in that country? Did you notice he is helping cover up the massacre of 2,000 afghans, admittedly a war crime?

You're falling for the icing, when the cake is the exact same fucking poisonous cake that we've been force-fed for the past eight years (and many would says longer).

Please .....
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Postby ninakat » Sun Jul 12, 2009 5:40 am

Thanks Nordic. I'm so fucking sick of all this denial from the Obama supporters. They're seriously disappointing me, almost as much as the denialists who cover up 9/11. No wonder I'm so fucking depressed at humanity.... sorry folks. Gets to you.
User avatar
ninakat
 
Posts: 2904
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:38 pm
Location: "Nothing he's got he really needs."
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby RocketMan » Sun Jul 12, 2009 8:29 am

Nordic, that was a beautiful waste of breath. :)

:wowsign:
-I don't like hoodlums.
-That's just a word, Marlowe. We have that kind of world. Two wars gave it to us and we are going to keep it.
User avatar
RocketMan
 
Posts: 2813
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 7:02 am
Location: By the rivers dark
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby chlamor » Sun Jul 12, 2009 8:40 am

Pervasive Surveillance Continuing Under Obama. New DHS-NSA-AT&T "Cybersecurity" Partnership

Under the rubric of cybersecurity, the Obama administration is moving forward with a Bush regime program to screen state computer traffic on private-sector networks, including those connecting people to the Internet, The Washington Post revealed July 3.

That project, code-named "Einstein," may very well be related to the much-larger, ongoing and highly illegal National Security Agency (NSA) communications intercept program known as "Stellar Wind," disclosed in 2005 by The New York Times.

There are several components to Stellar Wind, one of which is a massive data-mining project run by the agency. As USA Today revealed in 2006, the "National Security Agency has been secretly collecting the phone call records of tens of millions of Americans, using data provided by AT&T, Verizon and BellSouth."

Under the current program, Einstein will be tied directly into giant NSA data bases that contain the trace signatures left behind by cyberattacks; these immense electronic warehouses will be be fed by information streamed to the agency by the nation's telecommunications providers.

AT&T, in partnership with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the NSA will spearhead the aggressive new initiative to detect malicious attacks launched against government web sites--by continuing to monitor the electronic communications of Americans.

This contradicts President Obama's pledge announcing his administration's cybersecurity program on May 29. During White House remarks Obama said that the government will not continue Bush-era surveillance practices or include "monitoring private sector networks or Internet traffic."

Called the "flagship system" in the national security state's cyber defense arsenal, The Wall Street Journal reports that Einstein is "designed to protect the U.S. government's computer networks from cyberspies." In addition to cost overruns and mismanagement by outsourced contractors, the system "is being stymied by technical limitations and privacy concerns." According to the Journal, Einstein is being developed in three stages:

Einstein 1: Monitors Internet traffic flowing in and out of federal civilian networks. Detects abnormalities that might be cyber attacks. Is unable to block attacks.

Einstein 2: In addition to looking for abnormalities, detects viruses and other indicators of attacks based on signatures of known incidents, and alerts analysts immediately. Also can't block attacks.

Einstein 3: Under development. Based on technology developed for a National Security Agency program called Tutelage, it detects and deflects security breaches. Its filtering technology can read the content of email and other communications. (Siobhan Gorman, "Troubles Plague Cyberspy Defense," The Wall Street Journal, July 3, 2009)


As readers of Antifascist Calling are well aware, like other telecom grifters, AT&T is a private-sector partner of NSA and continues to be a key player in the agency's driftnet spying on Americans' electronic communications. In 2006, AT&T whistleblower Mark Klein revealed in a sworn affidavit, that the firm's Internet traffic that runs through fiber-optic cables at the company's Folsom Street facility in San Francisco was routinely provided to the National Security Agency.

Using a device known as a splitter, a complete copy of Internet traffic that AT&T receives--email, web browsing requests and other electronic communications sent by AT&T customers, was diverted onto a separate fiber-optic cable connected to the company's SG-3 room, controlled by the agency. Only personnel with NSA clearances--either working for, or on behalf of the agency--have access to this room.

Klein and other critics of the program, including investigative journalist James Bamford who reported in his book, The Shadow Factory, believe that some 15-30 identical NSA-controlled rooms exist at AT&T facilities scattered across the country.

Einstein: You Don't Have to Be a Genius to Know They're Lying

But what happens next, after the data is processed and catalogued by the agency is little understood. Programs such as Einstein will provide NSA with the ability to read and decipher the content of email messages, any and all messages in real-time.

While DHS claims that "the new program will scrutinize only data going to or from government systems," the Post reports that a debate has been sparked within the agency over "uncertainty about whether private data can be shielded from unauthorized scrutiny, how much of a role NSA should play and whether the agency's involvement in warrantless wiretapping during George W. Bush's presidency would draw controversy."

A "Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) for EINSTEIN 2" issued by DHS in May 2008, claims the system is interested in "malicious activity" and not personally identifiable information flowing into federal networks.

While DHS claims that "the risk associated with the use of this computer network security intrusion detection system is actually lower than the risk generated by using a commercially available intrusion detection system," this assertion is undercut when the agency states, "Internet users have no expectation of privacy in the to/from address of their messages or the IP addresses of the sites they visit."

When Einstein 3 is eventually rolled-out, Internet users similarly will "have no expectation of privacy" when it comes to the content of their communications.

DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano told reporters, "we absolutely intend to use the technical resources, the substantial ones, that NSA has." Seeking to deflect criticism from civil libertarians, Napolitano claims "they will be guided, led and in a sense directed by the people we have at the Department of Homeland Security."

Despite protests to the contrary by securocrats, like other Bush and Obama "cybersecurity" initiatives the Einstein program is a backdoor for pervasive state surveillance. Government Computer News reported in December 2008 that Marc Rotenberg, the executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) said that "the misuse or exposure of sensitive data from such a program [Einstein] could undermine the security arguments for surveillance."

And with Internet Service Providers routinely deploying deep packet inspection tools to "siphon off requested traffic for law enforcement," tools with the ability to "inspect and shape every single packet--in real time--for nearly a million simultaneous connections" as Ars Technica reported, to assume that ISPs will protect Americans' privacy rights from out-of-control state agencies is a foolhardy supposition at best.

The latest version of the system will not be rolled-out for at least 18 months. But like the Stellar Wind driftnet surveillance program, communications intercepted by Einstein 3 will be routed through a "monitoring box" controlled by NSA and their civilian contractors.

Under a classified pilot program approved during the Bush administration, NSA data and hardware would be used to protect the networks of some civilian government agencies. Part of an initiative known as Einstein 3, the plan called for telecommunications companies to route the Internet traffic of civilian agencies through a monitoring box that would search for and block computer codes designed to penetrate or otherwise compromise networks. (Ellen Nakashima, "Cybersecurity Plan to Involve NSA, Telecoms," The Washington Post, July 3, 2009)


However, investigative journalist Wayne Madsen reported last September "that the Bush administration has authorized massive surveillance of the Internet using as cover a cyber-security multi-billion dollar project called the 'Einstein' program."

While some researchers (including this one) question Madsen's overreliance on anonymous sources and undisclosed documents, in fairness it should be pointed out that nine months before The New York Times described the NSA's secret e-mail collection database known as Pinwale, Madsen had already identified and broken the story. According to Madsen,

The classified technology being used for Einstein was developed for the NSA in conducting signals intelligence (SIGINT) operations on email networks in Russia. Code-named PINWHEEL, the NSA email surveillance system targets Russian government, military, diplomatic, and commercial email traffic and burrows into the text portions of the email to search for particular words and phrases of interest to NSA eavesdroppers. According to NSA documents obtained by WMR, there is an NSA system code-named "PINWALE."

The DNI and NSA also plan to move Einstein into the private sector by claiming the nation's critical infrastructure, by nature, overlaps into the commercial sector. There are classified plans, already budgeted in so-called "black" projects, to extend Einstein surveillance into the dot (.) com, dot (.) edu, dot (.) int, and dot (.) org, as well as other Internet domains. Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff has budgeted $5.4 billion for Einstein in his department's FY2009 information technology budget. However, this amount does not take into account the "black" budgets for Einstein proliferation throughout the U.S. telecommunications network contained in the budgets for NSA and DNI. (Wayne Madsen, "'Einstein' replaces 'Big Brother' in Internet Surveillance," Online Journal, September 19, 2008)


A follow-up article published in February, identified the ultra-spooky Booz Allen Hamilton firm as the developer of Pinwale, an illegal program for the interception of text communications. According to Madsen, "the system is linked to a number of meta-databases that contain e-mail, faxes, and text messages of hundreds of millions of people around the world and in the United States."

In other words both classified programs, Pinwale and Einstein, are sophisticated electronic communications surveillance projects that most certainly will train the agency's formidable intelligence assets on the American people "using as cover a cyber-security multi-billion dollar project called the 'Einstein' program," as Madsen reported.

AT&T: "No Comment"

An AT&T spokesman refused to comment on the proposals and is seeking legal protection from the state that it will not be sued for privacy breaches as a result of its participation in the new program. "Legal certification" the Post reports, "has been held up for several months as DHS prepares a contract."

NSA's involvement is critical proponents claim, because the agency has a readily-accessible database of computer codes, or signatures "that have been linked to cyberattacks or known adversaries. The NSA has compiled the cache by, for example, electronically observing hackers trying to gain access to U.S. military systems," the Post averred.

Calling NSA's cache "the secret sauce...it's the stuff they have that the private sector doesn't," is what raises alarms for privacy and civil liberties' advocates. Known as Tutelage, NSA's classified program can detect and automatically decide how to deal with malicious intrusions, "to block them or watch them closely to better assess the threat," according to the Post. "The database for the program would also contain feeds from commercial firms and DHS's U.S. Computer Emergency Readiness Team, administration officials said."

Jeff Mohan, AT&T's executive director for Einstein, was more forthcoming earlier this year. He told Federal News Radio: "With these services, we will provide a secure portal from the agency's infrastructure, or Intranet to the public internet. There is a technical aspect, which is routers, firewalls and that sort of thing that applies these security capabilities across that portal and looks a Internet traffic that comes from public Internet to Intranet and vice versa."

The "technical aspect" will also provide federal agencies the ability to capture, sort, read and then store Americans' private communications in huge data bases run by NSA.

Mohan said that AT&T will provide the state with "optional services such as scanning e-mail and placing filters on agency networks to keep malicious e-mail off the network as well as forensic and storage capabilities also are available through MTIPS [Managed Trusted Internet Protocol Services]."

In addition to AT&T, other private partners awarded contracts under the General Services Administration's MTIPS which has a built-in "Einstein enclave" include: Sprint, L3 Communications, Qwest, MCI, General Dynamics and Verizon, according to multiple reports published by Federal Computer Week.

Claiming that the state is "looking for malicious content, not a love note to someone with a dot-gov e-mail address," a former unnamed "senior Bush administration official" told the Post "what we're interested in is finding the code, the thing that will do the network harm, not reading the e-mail itself."

Try selling that to the tens of millions of Americans whose private communications have been illegally spied upon by the Bush and Obama administrations or leftist dissidents singled-out for "special handling" by the national security state's public-private surveillance partnership!

An Electronic Spider's Web

As the "global war on terror" morphs into an endless war on our democratic rights, the NSA is expanding domestic operations by "decentralizing its massive computer hubs," The Salt Lake Tribune revealed.

The agency "will build a 1-million-square-foot data center at Utah's Camp Williams," the newspaper disclosed July 1. The new facility would be NSA's third major data center. In 2007, the agency announced plans to build a second data center in San Antonio, Texas after the Baltimore Sun reported that NSA had "maxed out" the electric capacity of the Baltimore area's power grid.

The San Antonio Current reported in December, that the NSA's Texas Cryptology Center will cost "upwards of $130 million." The 470,000 square-foot-facility is adjacent to a similar center constructed by software giant Microsoft. Investigative journalist James Bamford told the Current that under current law "NSA could gain access to Microsoft's stored data without even a warrant, but merely a fiber-optic cable."

A follow-up article by The Salt Lake Tribune reported that the facility will cost upwards of $2 billion dollars and that funds have already been appropriated by the Obama administration for NSA's new data center and listening post.

The secretive agency released a statement Thursday acknowledging the selection of Camp Williams as a site for the new center and describing it as "a specialized facility that houses computer systems and supporting equipment."

Budget documents provide a more detailed picture of the facility and its mission. The supercomputers in the center will be part of the NSA's signal intelligence program, which seeks to "gain a decisive information advantage for the nation and our allies under all circumstances" according to the documents. (Matthew D. LaPlante, "New NSA Center Unveiled in Budget Documents," The Salt Lake Tribune, July 2, 2009)


Not everyone is pleased with the announcement. Steve Erickson, the director of the antiwar Citizens Education Project told the Tribune, "Finally, the Patriot Act has a home."

While the total cost of rolling-out the Einstein 3 system is classified, The Wall Street Journal reports that "the price tag was expected to exceed $2 billion." And as with other national security state initiatives, it is the American people who are footing the bill for the destruction of our democratic rights.


http://antifascist-calling.blogspot.com ... under.html
Liberal thy name is hypocrisy. What's new?
chlamor
 
Posts: 2173
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 11:26 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby chlamor » Sun Jul 12, 2009 8:44 am

By Street, Paul

Boyd - In my experience there are a good # of people on the "liberal-left" who aren''t detached from reality about Obama at all but who I find just as disdainful of the basic left criticisms offered here as any deluded Ga Ga for Obama type. I know a few people like this. With them its not delusion or lack of understanding of basic centrist realities about Obama but rather (a) despair and (in some cases) (b) a particularly unattractive and (for me anyway) nasueating cynicism about ordinary peoples' capacity to resist power in any kind of relevant way. I know some folks in this (b) category. Some common threads among them are: possession of advanced professional/academic degrees; a sense of being too educated/intelligent for ordinary people and the broader horrific society they inhabit; substance abuse; prior histories in campus-based Sixties and Seventies movements and anger at their collapse; pathologically contrarian and hyper-individualistic attitudes in various areas of life; depression; a sense of self-righteousness about their glorious vote for a black candidate; an exaggerated sense that ordinary white people could not have any relevant issues with the Obama W.H. that aren't basically about racism; a sense that it doesn't matter to do elementary due-diligence research on Obama's policies because facts don't matter anyway in this culture (they lean towards "post-modernist: nihilism). Now this last characteristic does push them toward detachment, I guess, because if you get too cynical and lazy to do the basic work of researching what Empire's New Clothes (Obama) is really all about (he's EXACTLY about what a dedicated cadre of left analysts like Glen Ford and Bruce Dixon and John Pilger and I have been saying for years now), then you do in fact become ignorant of basic realities.

There are all kinds of "left" and "liberal" Obama supporters --- one underestimated group among them is the Cynics, a group that overlaps with the despondent.

I go back and forth on how to respond to Obama's "left fans." I started off acerbic and biting and that didn't work out all that well. I went to polite and understanding and that worked for a bit and then faded.

Now I'm just honestly confronting folks with things like "so how many more innocent kids have to get blown up in Afghanistan by U.S. bombs before you'll think about scraping that Obama sticker off the back of your car" or "Hey, I see you've got a 'Union Yes' sticker and an Obama sticker on your car over there. What you think about what happened to the Employee Free Choice Act? Think he'll ever open up NAFTA for re-negotiation? How about that auto-bailout?"

Now I'm going to start working on the environmentalist Obama-defenders I know with ammo from the St.Clair and Frank piece I cited in the previous comment..

Maybe the attitude to take to a lot of these creepy Obama folks is the one that Malcom X took towards Dr. King: use shame and mockery to push them left.

But then it isn't just or mainly about "Obama;" of course, it's also and more fundementally about the dominant order's success in getting people to define "politics" as being only about these big quadrennial candidate-centered election spectacles/rituals/extravaganzas instead of being about day-to -day grassroots struggles for justice, peace, democracy etc.
Liberal thy name is hypocrisy. What's new?
chlamor
 
Posts: 2173
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 11:26 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby chlamor » Sun Jul 12, 2009 8:45 am

Image
Liberal thy name is hypocrisy. What's new?
chlamor
 
Posts: 2173
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 11:26 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby chlamor » Sun Jul 12, 2009 8:51 am

Obama supports the Big Banksters not the workers in America. Have fun when your money means nothing and very soon too. Obama will keep lying to with you with a smiling face. The laugh is at your stupidity though. Wake Up Already! The old days are long gone folks. Stop looking at the USA as you did twenty or even ten years ago. Those times are gone forever. Things will keep getting worse and you will have no place to turn as state's become bankrupt and jobs are less than even now. The Stimulus even at this point is nothing but a band-aid without real structural change which the political and economic elites are against. Welcome to your new Serfdom status. Get ready to work as neoslaves. Wake up out of your stupors folks!

Don't you people realize that the America is a FAILED STATE NOW? That any other country would be under the control of the IMF and World Bank right now? Wake Up because America has Failed and you still want those who allowed it to fail to Fix It for Ya! Man, you people are DUMB!

Liberals and Progressives are very impotent. Wake Up out of your delusional states of mind.

Stop BITCHING IF YOU REMAIN IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ANYONE BITCHING HERE TODAY WHO DOES NOT JOIN THE GREEN PARTY IS JUST YELLING AND COMPLAINING IN VAIN WITH YOUR USUAL FAKE Liberal/Progressive WHINE(ING). STOP IT BECAUSE IT HAS BECOME TIRING LISTENING TO YOU FAKE Liberal/Progressives who actually thought Obama or that the Demnocratic Party---also a party of the military-corporate state was gonna bring any real "change." You so-called Liberals/Progressives have become very pathetic!

The Democratic Party is not an ally of Liberals and Progressives so get into some reality.

Obama is not a Liberal/Progressive but the newest face on the fading of the American Empire.

Obama's healthcare plan can be equated with a euthansia plan and the sooner you knuckleheads face this harsh reality the better off you will be. Get your heads out of your butts! Face facts folks--Obama and Biden are war mongers who back the military-corporatist state and most Democrats in the U.S. House and Senate are conservatives, and not liberals or progressives.

Until the next time, I am sure all of you will keep busy in those Democratic Party delusions and yes the illusion that Obama is such a "great leader."

Obama being an "environmentalist" is like saying the Mafia never killed anyone.

Obama is not trustworthy and you dolts keep thinking he will achieve substantial changes in the failed political system.


Came across above rant here:
http://www.alternet.org/rights/141227/d ... age=entire
Liberal thy name is hypocrisy. What's new?
chlamor
 
Posts: 2173
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 11:26 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 160 guests