Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
freemason9 wrote:but all you do is piss and moan because obama hasn't fulfilled your messiah lust. obama isn't messiah; he's simply a better president than we have had for over three decades. he's not a radical leftist, so radical leftists defile him. however, conservatives believe he is leftist to the point of being socialist. he isn't, of course.
pragmatism is not a bad word. in fact, in a sea of whiners and hand-wringers, pragmatists make the world work. they always, always have. they work slowly, consistently, and predictably--to the irritation of those that can bitch loudly with no consequences.
try enacting policy across a nation of 300 million that is supported by 15% of the population. just try it.
the fact is that our media is corporately controlled, and the media controls the electorate. any policy or action that conflicts with corporate policy in america is destined for spectacular failure and a setback of two or more decades. in fact, you can thank overly exuberant liberals in the 1960's and 70's (and a lack of intelligent, mature pragmatism) for the last three decades of conservative smog. it was a backlash.
here's lesson one, kiddies--stay out of their faces. us old fucks have learned that.
now carry on with your raised fists of liberation
freemason9 wrote:but all you do is piss and moan because obama hasn't fulfilled your messiah lust. obama isn't messiah; he's simply a better president than we have had for over three decades. he's not a radical leftist, so radical leftists defile him. however, conservatives believe he is leftist to the point of being socialist. he isn't, of course.
pragmatism is not a bad word. in fact, in a sea of whiners and hand-wringers, pragmatists make the world work. they always, always have. they work slowly, consistently, and predictably--to the irritation of those that can bitch loudly with no consequences.
try enacting policy across a nation of 300 million that is supported by 15% of the population. just try it.
the fact is that our media is corporately controlled, and the media controls the electorate. any policy or action that conflicts with corporate policy in america is destined for spectacular failure and a setback of two or more decades. in fact, you can thank overly exuberant liberals in the 1960's and 70's (and a lack of intelligent, mature pragmatism) for the last three decades of conservative smog. it was a backlash.
here's lesson one, kiddies--stay out of their faces. us old fucks have learned that.
now carry on with your raised fists of liberation
WASHINGTON — Despite President Barack Obama's promises of better safeguards for offshore drilling, federal regulators continue to approve plans for oil companies to drill in the Gulf of Mexico with minimal or no environmental analysis.
The Department of Interior's Minerals Management Service has signed off on at least five new offshore drilling projects since June 2, when the agency's acting director announced tougher safety regulations for drilling in the Gulf, a McClatchy review of public records has discovered.
Three of the projects were approved with waivers exempting them from detailed studies of their environmental impact — the same waiver the MMS granted to BP for the ill-fated well that's been fouling the Gulf with crude for two months.
In a May 14 speech in the Rose Garden, Obama said he was "closing the loophole that has allowed some oil companies to bypass some critical environmental reviews."
Environmental groups, however, say the loophole is as wide as ever and that the administration is allowing oil companies to proceed with drilling plans that may be just as flawed as BP's, which concluded that a major spill was "unlikely" and that the company was equipped to manage even the worst-case blowout.
"It's just outrageous," said Kieran Suckling, executive director of the Center for Biological Diversity, a conservation organization. "The whole world is screaming and . . . they're just continuing to move this stuff through the system."
freemason9 wrote:but all you do is piss and moan because obama hasn't fulfilled your messiah lust. obama isn't messiah; he's simply a better president than we have had for over three decades. he's not a radical leftist, so radical leftists defile him. however, conservatives believe he is leftist to the point of being socialist. he isn't, of course.
pragmatism is not a bad word. in fact, in a sea of whiners and hand-wringers, pragmatists make the world work. they always, always have. they work slowly, consistently, and predictably--to the irritation of those that can bitch loudly with no consequences.
try enacting policy across a nation of 300 million that is supported by 15% of the population. just try it.
the fact is that our media is corporately controlled, and the media controls the electorate. any policy or action that conflicts with corporate policy in america is destined for spectacular failure and a setback of two or more decades. in fact, you can thank overly exuberant liberals in the 1960's and 70's (and a lack of intelligent, mature pragmatism) for the last three decades of conservative smog. it was a backlash.
here's lesson one, kiddies--stay out of their faces. us old fucks have learned that.
now carry on with your raised fists of liberation
The report from the physicians’ group does not prove its case beyond doubt -- how could it when so much is still hidden? -- but it rightly calls on the White House and Congress to investigate the potentially illegal human experimentation and whether those who authorized or conducted it should be punished. Those are just two of the many unresolved issues from the Bush administration that President Obama and Congressional leaders have swept under the carpet.
slomo wrote:Numerous incidents now demonstrate that as high-level Bush lawbreakers are vested with presidential immunity, low-level whistle blowers who exposed serious wrongdoing and allowed citizens some minimal glimpse into what our government does are being persecuted by the Obama administration with a vengeance. Yesterday it was revealed by Wired that the Army intelligence officer analyst who reportedly leaked the Apache helicopter attack video to Wikileaks -- and thus enabled Americans to see what we are really doing in Iraq and other countries which we occupy and attack -- has been arrested (Wikileaks denies the part of that report claiming that the whistle blower also leaked to it "hundreds of thousands of classified State Department records"). This latest episode led Der Spiegel today to decry Obama's "war on whistle blowers" as more severe than the one waged by the Bush administration (English translation here).
(more..)
crikkett wrote:slomo wrote:Numerous incidents now demonstrate that as high-level Bush lawbreakers are vested with presidential immunity, low-level whistle blowers who exposed serious wrongdoing and allowed citizens some minimal glimpse into what our government does are being persecuted by the Obama administration with a vengeance. Yesterday it was revealed by Wired that the Army intelligence officer analyst who reportedly leaked the Apache helicopter attack video to Wikileaks -- and thus enabled Americans to see what we are really doing in Iraq and other countries which we occupy and attack -- has been arrested (Wikileaks denies the part of that report claiming that the whistle blower also leaked to it "hundreds of thousands of classified State Department records"). This latest episode led Der Spiegel today to decry Obama's "war on whistle blowers" as more severe than the one waged by the Bush administration (English translation here).
(more..)
I disagree with your opinion that the Obama administration is prosecuting whistleblowers 'with a vengeance'. I think it's a knee-jerk reaction and I'm holding out to see what really happens.
It's because Vengeance is more than just arresting someone who knows they'll be arrested if they are found to be leaking classified material.
you may benefit by not projecting your dreams so strongly on obama
Nordic wrote:That's exactly how Rush lost his sportscasting gig -- saying this exact thing about Donovan McNabb and the NFL.
freemason9 wrote:WIC is internal. if you need nutrition, you lack the will and knowledge to be nourished.
freemason9 wrote:Mortgage payments are internal. if you need money for housing, you lack the will and knowledge to be sheltered from heat, cold, rain, wind and snow.
freemason9 wrote:Training and education are internal. if you need someone to teach you skills and information, you lack the will and knowledge to be trained and educated.
freemason9 wrote:Health is internal. if you need medical attention, you lack the will and knowledge to be cured of disease and healed of injury.
freemason9 wrote:The accountability of elected officials is internal. if you need a democratically elected leader to act in the interests of the electorate, you lack the will and knowledge to be worth mattering in regard to decisions being made by others that impact your everyday life.
freemason9 wrote:liberation is internal. if you need leadership, you lack the will and knowledge to be liberated.
Nordic wrote:That's exactly how Rush lost his sportscasting gig -- saying this exact thing about Donovan McNabb and the NFL.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 169 guests