The Long Kiss Goodnight (1996) movie foretells 9/11

[greencrow0]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mockd-U4 ... t%2Ecom%2F

tres interresante...

The bad guy in this movie describes 9/11 down to a 'T' five years before the event.

Wuzzup wit dat?

gc

[greencrow0]

Gawd! How could Hollywood have known the plot of 9/11 five years before it happened?

gc

[FourthBase]

Maybe it leaked out to them in a late 90's bull session with the military? You know, like that conference they had post-9/11 with Spike Jonze et. al. where Hollywood helped the government "brainstorm" terrorist plots?

[jingofever]

Now 9/11 was a 'fund raiser' for the CIA? Wikipedia describes the movie: "She discovers that her former boss at the CIA, Leland Perkins has allied with a terrorist named Timothy in a false flag plot to detonate a chemical bomb in downtown Niagara Falls, New York, frame Islamic terrorists for the crime and thus secure more funding." The clip makes clear that their inspiration is the original WTC bombing, not an event that takes place five years into the future.

[MinM]

@Salon Dec 17

The underappreciated holiday joy of “The Long Kiss Goodnight”

Early this morning I caught a 'very special' episode of Riptide...

with Lance Henriksen of Millenium and...

Geena Davis of Thelma & Louise and Long Kiss Goodnight fame.


viewtopic.php?p=451018#p451018
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=11168

[seemslikeadream]

I have no idea. But it feels like 9/11. Except many many more people will suffer.

9/11/01 <---------> 11/9/16

I dunno. This almost seems too pat. The whole Wikileaks thing, I mean. It feels like manufactured opposition. Only time will tell.

Former acting CIA Director Michael Morell: Russian meddling in US election 'is the political equivalent of 9/11'

http://www.businessinsider.com/michael- ... 11-2016-12

go ahead give it to me


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1cm0QJ9MSo

[Novem5er]

Yes, I do think people forget that the WTC was already bombed once before. That was already in our pop culture psyche, as was the Oklahoma City Bombing, and it's not too far of a stretch to lump it all together with the pop culture phenomenon that was the Kennedy Assination and conspiracies around it.

BUT I used to love this movie and I had a huge crush on Gina Davis for many years because of it

BTW that comment by Michael Morrell is kind of evidence that 9/11 has reached Kennedy level pop culture status, as terrible and sad as that may be.

[tapitsbo]

yes.. the political equivalent of 9/11 (because there was nothing political about 9/11, of course!)

but we know a good false flag when we see one!

[seemslikeadream]

John Bolton says the Russian hack was a false flag

maybe the new deputy sec of state

[tapitsbo]

"Russian hack" is supposed to mean wikileaks, right?

Must be a lot of Hollywood movies that tell this story... (90's cyber-hacker campiness!)

[seemslikeadream]

no the other ones

Assange: Some leaks may have been Russian
BY JOE UCHILL - 12/15/16 05:25 PM EST 384

Assange: Some leaks may have been Russian
© Getty Images
On Sean Hannity’s radio show, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said that hacked Democratic documents sent to reporters at Gawker and The Hill may have come from Russia. But, he said, he is confident the emails he received did not come from the same source.

The Hill and other outlets received documents from a hacker or hackers calling itself “Guccifer 2.0.” Guccifer 2.0 also posted separate documents on its own site. Assange denied knowing Guccifer 2.0 on Hannity's show Thursday.

“Our source is not the Russian government,” said Assange, later claiming WikiLeaks did not receive its material from any state actor, Russia or otherwise.

While the intelligence community agrees that Russia hacked the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the Democratic National Campaign Committee, there is dissent over whether the Russians did so with an eye to promoting President-elect Donald Trump or just generally wanting to sow chaos.

Assange has been adamant that Russia did not send the files to his site. In fact, his confirmation that a state actor did not send the hacked emails violates a longstanding WikiLeaks policy of not making any comment about sources.

He did leave the possibility open that Guccifer 2.0’s leaks to the media were a Russian plot.

“Now, who is behind these, we don’t know,” he said. “These look very much like they’re from the Russians. But in some ways, they look very amateur, and almost look too much like the Russians.”
In the Hannity interview, Assange also claimed that WikiLeaks received three pages of information about Trump and the Republican National Convention. It chose not to reprint those documents because they had already been printed elsewhere.

The New York Times reported intelligence officials believe that Russia also hacked the Republican National Committee but chose not to leak those files to prop up the Trump candidacy.

Assange also declined to comment on a Daily Mail report that his confidant Craig Murray flew to the United States to retrieve the documents printed on the site. Murray told the Daily Mail that he met with an intermediary in a wooded area near American University in Washington, D.C., who was handing off the documents on behalf of someone with “legal access” to both the DNC and Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta emails.

“Craig Murray is not authorized to talk on behalf of WikiLeaks,” Assange said sternly.

http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity ... en-russian

[tapitsbo]

I do wonder about the triangulation/timing of Gawker/Thiel/Epstein/Hulk Hogan...