by Homeless Halo » Tue Oct 18, 2005 5:59 am
Of course, from what I've seen, you seem to be fairly taken by Mr. Steiner's approach. I personally find it lacking in certain respects, not the least of which is its failure to line up with various aspects of religious history. If seen in a symbolic sense, Mr Steiner may have a number of genuine insights, but taken without salt, he seems like just another bubble headed new ager. <br><br>I'm particularly skeptical about his "hierarchies" of spiritual entities, as I find it unlikely that such information, even if true, could be known so certainly. He appears to give a mishmash of redacted Christian mysticism and Theosophical leanings. I'm still bothered by his assertions as to the fate of the world and such things as his confusion over the Satan/Lucifer/Molech/Christ relationship, as his opinon on this issue seems to vary with time is always at odds with historical scholarship on this issue.<br><br>It is possible that as, I assume, at least a partial adherent to his teachings you could explain it better to me.<br><br>Also, if it was me you referred to above(your sub line re: my post), you could explain how I am a LHP proponent, and what the essential differences between this and the RHP are so that I might mend my ways, if this is so.<br><br>Beyond that, we could discuss further the teachings of the RC. I've always been fascinated by these fellows as my own Occult "branch" owes much to their knowledge and traditions.<br><br>Such are my thoughts.<br><br>Love is the Law,<br>-SHCR<br><br> <p></p><i></i>