8 part high quality docu on the Illuminati

Moderators: DrVolin, Elvis, Jeff

Re: Revelation of the Method

Postby NewKid » Sun Mar 05, 2006 10:34 pm

Mother said:<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Don't forget to add the photo of Maria Schriver in wedding gown doing the old horned sign. And Marion Barry!! Who'd have guessed, hehe. Wasn't he supposed to be a Redskins fan?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>You forgot the picture of Woody Allen picking his ass with his thumb and middle finger. Major death cult symbol there. <br><br><br>Rothbardian said:<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Let me try to add to what Thumperton is saying (although I don't know about this 'Revelation' thing).---<br><br>Take a look at this Time magazine cover of Robertson (from twenty years ago) and use a little common sense deduction: <br>www.time.com/time/covers/...17,00.html<br><br>He is displaying this Masonic (and I would argue..Illuminist) 'Lion's Paw', virtually unknown to the outside world even today, much more so in the mid eighties before the Web.<br><br>He is a major 'Christian' leader getting a once-in-a-lifetime crack at a Time mag. cover...and his first priority was to send a message/signal that deceptively circumvents his Christian audience? Why?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><br>Dude, a reminder that you're talking about fucking Pat Robertson. <br><br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>If his Masonic activity were no more than a kind of 'Dungeons and Dragons' for older people...it makes no sense that he would interrupt his 'real' life (posing for a momentous Time mag. cover)...to play some sort of adult Pokemon. That seems pollyannish to me.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><br><br>Yes, I can't imagine why such a serious figure like Pat would interrupt his faith healing to play such silly games. What on earth would Charles Taylor think of it? <br><br>By the way, what does the symbol mean and what message is he trying to communicate? <br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>There is something more ominous going on here...something bigger than what Masons and NewKid(and these others) would argue is no more than the equivalent of Ninja Turtles solidarity. Give me a break.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><br>That's why Jerry Falwell doesn't like Teletubbies. Because he's in the Ninja Turtles club. <br><br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>And then you can make historical connections--- Karl Marx ALSO makes a specific point of flashing the Paw...AND notice how he very carefully places this occultic/luciferian crescent (horned) moon pendant over his wrist. www.historyguide.org/intellect/marx.html So much for mainstream historians claim about Marx being an atheist, by the way. <br><br>And again, why would Marx interrupt his 'real' life to play Power Rangers? This guy was deadly, deadly serious about all of his causes. <hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>His right hand in his coat pocket. Powerful evidence indeed. But why not the masonic paw in this picture?<br><br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>And here is Napoleon, also doing the Paw thing. Notice the satanic/luciferian pentagrams on the sphere next to Napoleon's left hand in this portrait. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ima...aparte.jpg<br><br>Another tidbit about the Illuminati is the fact that early Bolsheviks referred to themselves as 'Spartacusts' in a salute to Weisshaupt who had chosen that pseudonym (Spartacus) for himself. That is an awfully big hint that should be followed up by anyone pursuing intellectual integrity and honesty.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><br>Well, we've certainly got a sordid cast of characters here. Dude, they might be all worshipping Lucifer and stuff. I'm open to it. I really am. But, <br><br>This. is. not. serious. evidence. of. shit. <br><br> <br> <p></p><i></i>
NewKid
 
Posts: 1036
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Revelation of the Method

Postby NewKid » Sun Mar 05, 2006 10:59 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>the thumbs don't neccessarily have to cover the two middle and ring fingers, and there are several ways to make the devil sign. In any case, just read Prince William's caption below.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Um, all I see in the caption is that it's "familiar."<br><br>But I guess we now have at least three different handsignals the Iilluminati can choose from. Man, the illuminati must be just like every other committee I've been on that can't make up its mind. <br><br>Folks, do you know how many fraternities, societies, treehouses, etc. use the same handshake, hand gesture, etc.? <br><br>Do you know how gullible you sound? Have you considered the possibility that the people that put this stuff out are fucking with you and think of you no differently than the drooling Zombies watching Fox News? <br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr> Unsure. Although very famous people like Madonna are involved in things like Kabbalah and I read somewhere she ask the devil on a black throne for fame in exchange for her soul. Probably apocryphal though. As well, a lot of heavy metal has the message of Apotheosis or hatred towards God at its core.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><br>I have no further questions . . . <p></p><i></i>
NewKid
 
Posts: 1036
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Revelation of the Method

Postby thumperton » Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:20 pm

<!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.texemarrs.com/images/prince_william_el_diablo.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--><br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>NewKid said:</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Um, <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>all I see</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> in the caption is that it's <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>"familiar."</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END-->Perhaps this is just an exercise in futility. For someone who can't even read a six word caption properly, I doubt anything the people here or myself have to say will wake up you up to this matrix.<br><br>Keep selectively reading and closing your eyes, and maybe the world will disappear... or maybe it won't.<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>NewKid said:</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>But I guess we now have at least three different handsignals the Iilluminati can choose from. Man, the illuminati must be just like every other committee I've been on that can't make up its mind.<br><br>Folks, do you know how many fraternities, societies, treehouses, etc. use the same handshake, hand gesture, etc.?<br><br>Do you know how gullible you sound? Have you considered the possibility that the people that put this stuff out are fucking with you and think of you no differently than the drooling Zombies watching Fox News?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END-->And now it degenerates into mindless nonsense. Are you trying to convince us, or yourself here?<br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v709/raichu4u/monkey.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <p></p><i></i>
thumperton
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Revelation of the Method

Postby NewKid » Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:31 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Perhaps this is just an exercise in futility. For someone who can't even read a six word caption properly, I doubt anything the people here or myself have to say will wake up you up to this matrix.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>You got me Thumpy. It's says 'Satanic' there doesn't it. And by the way, did Reuters put that there? Just curious. <br><br>The question, by the way, had to do with the variance of the thumb in the handsignal. Alex Jones' or whoever's captioning under it didn't answer that question. <br><br>Oh, and one more thing, what music was Will listening to in that picture? <p></p><i></i>
NewKid
 
Posts: 1036
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Some Perspective

Postby antiaristo » Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:41 pm

thumperton,<br>You are of course correct about the City of London.<br><br>But what has that got to do with a Masonic symbol prominently displayed on a signed document that will send its author to prison? <p></p><i></i>
antiaristo
 
Posts: 2555
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 9:50 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Revelation of the Method

Postby thumperton » Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:42 pm

<!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>mother said:</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Don't forget to add the photo of Maria Schriver in wedding gown doing the old horned sign. And Marion Barry!! Who'd have guessed, hehe. Wasn't he supposed to be a Redskins fan?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END-->please, you're upsetting NewKid here.<br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.smiliesftw.com/!/happysad.gif" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <p></p><i></i>
thumperton
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Some Perspective

Postby thumperton » Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:46 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>thumperton,<br>You are of course correct about the City of London.<br><br>But what has that got to do with a Masonic symbol prominently displayed on a signed document that will send its author to prison?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END-->Didn't you say these lawyers worked in the City? I've read that the BAR is a masonic lodge. <p></p><i></i>
thumperton
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

You're overselling the point.

Postby rothbardian » Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:48 pm

Go, Thumperton!<br><br>NewKid--<br><br>Specifically in regards to my post-- was there an actual rebuttal in there somewhere? You requoted my statements(?) and then simply declared that they aren't valid. I think you're confusing your 'declarations' with 'argumentation'. <br><br>You state: "Yes, I can't imagine why such a serious figure like Pat would interrupt his faith healing to play such silly games."<br><br>Uh...but he did. And he did it on the cover of Time mag. Brushing that aside as you are, is nonsensical.<br><br>You're sort of 'double-talking' inside your own post. You concede that they "might...be worshipping Lucifer". Then in your last sentence you claim that no such evidence has been presented. Which is it? <br><br>Marx is wearing an occultic pendant. You are saying that indicates something...or nothing? I don't follow. <br><br>The fact that early Bolsheviks saluted Weisshaupt isn't possibly indicative Of Illuminati philosophy extending into real world politics? <br><br>Your complete brush-off of this right upfront, without offering any counter reasoning...is also nonsensical.<br><br>I think you have thrown my comments back as though they are being 'oversold'. These little tidbit facts are not meant to be the 'be-all-end-all' to a debate about the existence of the Illuminati. They're just a few opening thoughts/facts...that should spur someone to pursue additional research. <br><br>When you hold up a couple of comments such as I have made and declare "this doesn't prove the whole thing about the Illuminati"...that's just silly and disingenuous. <br> <p></p><i></i>
rothbardian
 
Posts: 659
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 11:08 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

silly me

Postby antiaristo » Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:49 pm

Sorry thumperton<br><br>I withdraw my last remark <p></p><i></i>
antiaristo
 
Posts: 2555
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 9:50 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: silly me

Postby thumperton » Mon Mar 06, 2006 12:03 am

Does anyone know if there's an Asian or Middle Eastern equivalent to the Illuminati? Or is this a predominantly White Male/Zionist/Freemasonry conspiracy? If so, what's up with that? <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=thumperton@rigorousintuition>thumperton</A> at: 3/5/06 9:06 pm<br></i>
thumperton
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Revelation of the Method

Postby mother » Mon Mar 06, 2006 12:04 am

Well, New Kid has demolished the myth of the Illuminati, that frisky little goat. On top of suggesting that I was "hitting on him". Gasp. More later on the Revelaion of the Method theory, thumperton. I've read about it, it makes a certain sense, but I'm still stuck on the possibilities of the homunclus(pardon my spelling) <p></p><i></i>
mother
 
Posts: 406
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 12:02 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Revelation of the Method

Postby thumperton » Mon Mar 06, 2006 12:10 am

I should think that the Beast System has to make itself known first, before people can bow down and worship it. <p></p><i></i>
thumperton
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: You're overselling the point.

Postby NewKid » Mon Mar 06, 2006 12:11 am

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Specifically in regards to my post-- was there an actual rebuttal in there somewhere? You requoted my statements(?) and then simply declared that they aren't valid. I think you're confusing your 'declarations' with 'argumentation'. <br>You state: "Yes, I can't imagine why such a serious figure like Pat would interrupt his faith healing to play such silly games."<br><br>Uh...but he did. And he did it on the cover of Time mag. Brushing that aside as you are, is nonsensical. <hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><br><br>This is getting boring folks. I'm saying Pat Robertson is a charlatan and a flake and there are any number of reasons why he might hold his hand up for the cover of Time magazine. <br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>You're sort of 'double-talking' inside your own post. You concede that they "might...be worshipping Lucifer". Then in your last sentence you claim that no such evidence has been presented. Which is it? <hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><br><br>You obviously missed the day in school when they covered how to make an argument. Rothbardian, anything's possible. If you're at this board, you should probably know that. But what's possible is quite different from whether something is proven or likely or reasonable to believe. You are making fairly extraordinary claims. Any reasonable fact finder would want fairly good proof before believing them. Nothing you've shown me is even remotely convincing. <br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Marx is wearing an occultic pendant. You are saying that indicates something...or nothing? I don't follow. <hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>I'm saying you are very gullible. <br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>The fact that early Bolsheviks saluted Weisshaupt isn't possibly indicative Of Illuminati philosophy extending into real world politics? <hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><br>What is their philosophy? And how and where is the philospohy of Weisshaupt or the Bolsheviks represented in the Bush administration? I know they control all sides of the debate. Order out of chaos and Hegel, gotcha. But if the NWO is several hundred years old, it isn't really new anymore is it? <br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Your complete brush-off of this right upfront, without offering any counter reasoning...is also nonsensical. <br>I think you have thrown my comments back as though they are being 'oversold'. These little tidbit facts are not meant to be the 'be-all-end-all' to a debate about the existence of the Illuminati. They're just a few opening thoughts/facts...that should spur someone to pursue additional research. <hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Tell you what, you go pursue that research and I'll take a look at it in your dissertation when it comes out. <br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>When you hold up a couple of comments such as I have made and declare "this doesn't prove the whole thing about the Illuminati"...that's just silly and disingenuous.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <br><br>Yes, but that's just silly ol' me Rothbardian. Can you not just accept me for who I am? <br><br><br><br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>
NewKid
 
Posts: 1036
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Revelation of the Method

Postby NewKid » Mon Mar 06, 2006 12:14 am

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Does anyone know if there's an Asian or Middle Eastern equivalent to the Illuminati? Or is this a predominantly White Male/Zionist/Freemasonry conspiracy? If so, what's up with that? <hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>I'm afraid they are not equal opportunity conspiracists. <p></p><i></i>
NewKid
 
Posts: 1036
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Revelation of the Method

Postby thumperton » Mon Mar 06, 2006 12:17 am

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>I'm afraid they are not equal opportunity conspiracists.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END-->I wonder if the NAACP knows this <!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.smiliesftw.com/!/redface.gif" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <p></p><i></i>
thumperton
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to Secret Societies

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests