8 part high quality docu on the Illuminati

Moderators: DrVolin, Elvis, Jeff

How DID that happen? Jeff?

Postby Rigorous Intuition » Tue Mar 07, 2006 2:34 am

I have no idea. "thumperton" is still listed as a banned username. <p></p><i></i>
Rigorous Intuition
 
Posts: 1744
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 3:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: DE, not again!

Postby meekster » Tue Mar 07, 2006 2:38 am

"...the occult cryptocracy. I don't deny that it exists, however I feel that there are some major over-simplifications with the fundamentalist and subsequent pop cultural packaging of the "illuminati" en toto."<br><br>Yea. The fundies think that they are the "elect", and that they can't be deceived. Not. It is, I think, a wise thing to attempt to rigorously consider ALL my "beliefs", and to consider why I have them, and from where they come. I have taken the fundamental attitude that "I am deceived", and it has become a remarkable well of ever deepening and multiplying insight.<br><br>I'm currently working on the symbolic, spiritual meaning of sex and gender, the eating of meat, and on the "working of hands". :-) It's fun! <p></p><i></i>
meekster
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:17 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: DE, not again!

Postby NewKid » Tue Mar 07, 2006 3:38 am

Holy shit, DE, that Texe Marrs site is awesome! <br><br>Now Anton LaVey, various politicians, 80s metal bands, and McDonalds' executives I suspected, but I had no idea that Amy Grant, much less, Benny Hinn, Jesse Duplantis, Kenneth Copeland, and Dr. Rodney "let that joy begin to bubble right out of your belly" Howard Browne were in on it too.<br><br>Goddamn, are Paul and Jan satanists as well?<br><br>I swear, if Texe shows me a picture of John Avanzini with Michael Aquino, I think I'm gonna cry. <br><br>P.S. And don't tell me there's a seven-lane bridge in Laredo, Texas for no reason.<br><br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>
NewKid
 
Posts: 1036
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Consider all perspectives

Postby Avalon » Tue Mar 07, 2006 3:58 am

<!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>I, to be perfectly honest, find the Pat Robertson picture intriguing. That's a clearly deliberate pose he has struck. It's awkward looking and I think it is worth having a look at.</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>Mmm, yeah, deliberate. And that means...exactly what?<br><br>I'm a fairly serious amateur photographer, and I'll critique photos at the drop of a hat the way some of you see the Illuminati's clues under every chair.<br><br>Take a look through your local paper -- a weekly, and the daily from a small city. I specify that so as to not limit the images to those of the powerful, as the little papers will have less stroingent filters. Wander over to your local bookstore, and check through the back covers of the novels to see author<br><br>Take a look at the PR photos sent to accompany articles. Chances are that you'll see a whole lot of hands up around the face or elsewhere in awkward positions that you've rarely seen in life. Those coy hands supporting the chin, for example. There's a certain kind of commercial photographer that dotes on having the hand visible near the face. It's like visual fingers on blackboards to me, but for some who take portraits by the book it's gospel.<br><br>Hey, Robertson's photo could be a signal to his masters, maybe. But before committing to that reading of it I'd want to look into other photos by that photographer and see what he does with hands.<br><br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Avalon
 
Posts: 1529
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 2:53 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Consider all perspectives

Postby NewKid » Tue Mar 07, 2006 5:36 am

Don't talk to me. Just don't talk to me! <br><br><br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.upload2.com/freeimagehosting/cc9e4d31cfc71233659a2c11aac8e32f.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--><br> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=newkid@rigorousintuition>NewKid</A> at: 3/7/06 2:45 am<br></i>
NewKid
 
Posts: 1036
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Consider all perspectives

Postby Qutb » Tue Mar 07, 2006 7:52 am

New Kid, that's funny <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :lol --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/laugh.gif ALT=":lol"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
Qutb
 
Posts: 1203
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 2:28 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Consider all perspectives

Postby Dreams End » Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:37 am

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>I'm a fairly serious amateur photographer, and I'll critique photos at the drop of a hat the way some of you see the Illuminati's clues under every chair.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>I think you have me confused with someone else. My point was that I don't. BUT, a TIME cover is a fairly serious shoot, with fairly high level photographers assigned to it. And that's a weird looking gesture. Hence "intriguing". If nothing else, it's a bad photo, having that fist in the foreground makes it look larger than it is...and so it's distracting. They may have had some reason in mind for the pose...I have no idea. But it was deliberate, whatever the reason.<br><br>Now, Spiderman on the other hand.... <p></p><i></i>
Dreams End
 

There is one thing more disturbing

Postby bamabecky » Tue Mar 07, 2006 2:04 pm

than intelligent-fundamentalist-Booosh-sympathizers without any curiosity as to how the towers fell for example, and that is, intelligent-computer-savvy-educated individuals who deliberately set out to confuse what ever issue is being discussed. Sigh! Call it both sides of the issue if you want to. How many sides can truth have? <br><br>I can't believe I read this entire post! <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :\ --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/ohwell.gif ALT=":\"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>Floyd, you are a great teacher.....I'm trying to learn!<br>Bama <p></p><i></i>
bamabecky
 
Posts: 109
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 11:03 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: There is one thing more disturbing

Postby thumperton » Tue Mar 07, 2006 3:30 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>than intelligent-fundamentalist-Booosh-sympathizers without any curiosity as to how the towers fell for example, and that is, intelligent-computer-savvy-educated individuals who deliberately set out to confuse what ever issue is being discussed. Sigh! Call it both sides of the issue if you want to. How many sides can truth have?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>"The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists."</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> J. Edgar Hoover<br><br>I think we're looking at a defence mechanism. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=thumperton@rigorousintuition>thumperton</A> at: 3/7/06 12:31 pm<br></i>
thumperton
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: There is one thing more disturbing

Postby Gouda » Tue Mar 07, 2006 3:46 pm

"The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists." J. Edgar Hoover<br><br><br>Ah yes. Our fine J. Edgar, facing the civil rights movement. <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Gouda
 
Posts: 3009
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:53 am
Location: a circular mould
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: There is one thing more disturbing

Postby thumperton » Tue Mar 07, 2006 3:50 pm

woops.<br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.smiliesftw.com/!/hsughno.gif" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--><br><br>I just thought it was a good quote was all.<br><br>moving along, nothing to see here folks... <p></p><i></i>
thumperton
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

DE

Postby Avalon » Tue Mar 07, 2006 4:18 pm

<!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>I think you have me confused with someone else. My point was that I don't. BUT, a TIME cover is a fairly serious shoot, with fairly high level photographers assigned to it. And that's a weird looking gesture. Hence "intriguing". If nothing else, it's a bad photo, having that fist in the foreground makes it look larger than it is...and so it's distracting. They may have had some reason in mind for the pose...I have no idea. But it was deliberate, whatever the reason.</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>Sorry DE, I was intending that that be a general comment, not singling out you. I generally trust your intincts. Yes, it is intriguing, under the circumstances, and yes, it's a creepy photo. It's just a matter of what conclusions I'd leap to without more rigorous analysis. Is he one of Satan's or Weishaupt's minions? Dunno. <br><br>Does he really have a deformed right ring finger? I can't figure out how to otherwise get that joint to appear so wasp-waisted as it shows in this image.<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Avalon
 
Posts: 1529
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 2:53 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: hrrmm...

Postby thumperton » Tue Mar 07, 2006 6:52 pm

<!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://ccwf.cc.utexas.edu/~tjmoore/imagesofrome/19thcentury/washington.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.delusionresistance.org/images/Baphomet2.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--><br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.smiliesftw.com/!/hsugh.gif" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.smiliesftw.com/!/hsugh.gif" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <p></p><i></i>
thumperton
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

embarrassed to keep this here

Postby Dreams End » Wed Mar 08, 2006 2:11 am

but it is on topic. <br><br>Check this out:<br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.reandev.com/taliban/photos/Pat%20Robertson0.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--><br><br>Compare. Same image color enhanced...no. Maybe the same shoot but not the same image.<br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://img.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1986/1101860217_400.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--><br><br>It looks like the same background....so I think it's an unretouched image from the same shoot. But clearly, the "paw" is a deliberate pose as it's done in both. <br><br>But that's a tad different from saying this proves anything...but as Dave Emory says, "grounds for further research." Most masons don't deny membership...is it part of his official bio? <p></p><i></i>
Dreams End
 

about the Robertson photos

Postby Rigorous Intuition » Wed Mar 08, 2006 2:52 am

"Grounds for further research," sure. But I don't have much patience for this stuff.<br><br>Is it likely Robertson directed the photo shoot, and then instructed <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>Time</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> which image to use, in order to send a secret message?<br><br>Or is it more plausible that, in a session during which dozens of images were likely snapped, the photographer said "Now Pat, let's try a few with your hand over your heart. Clench a little ...now make a fist... don't look so happy...." <p></p><i></i>
Rigorous Intuition
 
Posts: 1744
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 3:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to Secret Societies

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests