Madeleine Incorporated

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Madeleine Incorporated

Postby hiddenite » Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:58 am

Not sure how many of you have been following the strange case of Madeleine Mccann , but here is an interesting take on the subject.

http://ben-fairhall.blogspot.com/2007/08/madeleine-incorporated.html
hiddenite
 
Posts: 203
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:39 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

what an interesting article

Postby slow_dazzle » Fri Aug 17, 2007 8:44 am

the author has carried out some good research and has had the courage to put his thoughts up for all to see. Well worth the read.

It did seem utterly bizarre that the child just vanished into thin air. Sadly, children do disappear but the circumstances here are very odd. No-one saw ANYTHING?

More brain food - thanks.
On behalf of the future, I ask you of the past to leave us alone. You are not welcome among us. You have no sovereignty where we gather.

John Perry Barlow - A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace
slow_dazzle
 
Posts: 1132
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 3:19 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby tal » Fri Aug 17, 2007 10:01 am

Interesting logos from your link, hiddenite. Compare:

Image
Child Focus, or the European Center for Missing and Sexually Exploited Children, was founded in 1998 by Daniel Cardon de Lichtbuer and headed by this person ever since. In 2005, de Lichtbuer became chairman of the International Centre for Missing and Exploited Children (ICMEC), headquartered in Washington and founded in 1999. Who is this Lichtbuer? First of all, he is quite big in the financial world, with former positions in Banque Bruxelles Lambert, the Belgian Bankers' Association, VP Bank Liechtenstein (with Nikolaus von Liechtenstein), Thomas Cook Traveller Cheques and the European Financial Marketing Association. He also has been executive president of the aristocratic Europa Nostra. But things become really problematic upon reading that de Lichtbuer is a member of the honorary committee of Cercle de Lorraine, together with with Maurice Lippens and Etienne Davignon. Equally worrying is his position as honorary executive president of the Koninklijke Vereniging der Historische Woonsteden en Tuinen van België, together with prince Alexander de Merode (former chair) and Count Ghislain d'Ursel. Davignon used to be a board member too. There's another indication that de Lichtbuer might not be the best choice for an anti- child abuse organization: 1998, Stef Janssens, 'The names from the cover up', p. 33: "In 1989, [Nicolas] de Kerchove d'Ousselghem [CEPIC; chef de cabinet of Vanden Boeynants; contact of VdB to the PIO intelligence organization] and Paul Vankerkhoven, CEPIC member and co-founder of Cercle des Nations [among many other things]... were employees of the magazine 'Revue Belge'. This right-wing magazine had as manager the present director of the Center for Missing Children and former BBL-director Daniel Cardon de Lichtbuer. What in itself is not reprehensible, but does say something about the milieu in which the present director of this Center was involved with." To clarify, that milieu appears to be the highest level child abuse milieu.[/size]
from here


And:


Image



[/url]
tal
 
Posts: 406
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 11:20 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby HMKGrey » Fri Aug 17, 2007 11:21 am

I don't buy a lot of that article.

Sorry, just don't.

The reason the McCann's slapped trademarks all over the name was to give themselves legal protection against the myriad unofficial and entirely gratuitous Find Madeleine web sites that were popping up and tricking people in to donating money. (Several people are already charged with fraud in this)I don't think it's entirely unreasonable to expect parents thrust in to the middle of a maelstrom like this to seek professional help and to take a 'scorch the earth' view of what is going on around them and what they need to protect.

That said, I think the McCann's made a huge mistake and if they weren't white and very much upper middle class they'd have been hounded to distraction by the media. There would very possibly be a campaign in place to have them charged with child endangerment.

But there isn't.

A lot of what is going on around them is clearly the work of fast thinking attorneys and other ambulance chasers who descend in to this kind of media scrum with glee.

I don't buy the conspiracy and articles like that don't help anyone.
HMKGrey
 
Posts: 666
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 6:56 pm
Location: West Coast
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby sunny » Fri Aug 17, 2007 11:37 am

HMKGrey, do you have young children? This got my attention:

Kate and Gerry McCann from Leicestershire took their 3-year-old daughter Madeleine (pictured) with them on holiday to Portugal. The family were staying at the Mark Warner Ocean Club Summer Beach Resort in Praia da Luz on the Algarve.

Last night (3rd May 2007) Kate and Gerry went for a meal at a tapas restaurant, checking on Madeleine in their nearby apartment every half hour or so.
***

UPDATE 2:45pm GMT: The apartment the McCanns were staying in was on the ground floor, and was within sight of the restaurant the parents were dining at. I don’t particularly want to indulge in recriminations against the parents (pictured), as I believe they must be going through absolute hell right now and the emphasis should be on finding Madeleine, but having said that I couldn’t help but notice this on the Mark Warner website:

Childcare
Mark Warner’s superb childcare facilities for all ages from four months upwards are available and a unique service on offer at the Ocean Club is our ‘Dine Out’ option. As accommodations are spread throughout the village, we offer to keep an eye on the little ones while you go out to eat - just drop them at our kids club, ready for bed and pick them up when you’ve finished.

The resort is tailored to meet the needs of families and it does seem strange, if this option was on offer, that the McCanns chose not to take advantage of it.
http://crimeblog.us/?p=399
***


I'm sorry, you just don't leave 3 yr. olds alone in an apartment, in a strange city, and only check on them every 30 min. or so. I know this is not proof of foul play on the part of the McCannn's, but it is just not something responsible parents do, especially considering the babysitting service offered by the resort. We are not just talking about fears of abduction here- what if there were a fire, or some other emergency? Another strange thing-did they or did they not have with them their other two children on the trip to Portugal? I can't find an answer to that right now.

And that 30 min interval. How fortuitous the kidnapper knew when to strike.
Choose love
sunny
 
Posts: 5220
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Alabama
Blog: View Blog (1)

the twins

Postby hiddenite » Fri Aug 17, 2007 12:49 pm

Yes Sunny, the 2 year old twins were also left alone during the night along with Madeleine. They apparently slept through the whole whatever happened event .
The "technical " manager of the resort has gone on record stating that she advised the parents not to leave the children in this way because of the burglaries that frequently took place ,a particular worry since the Mccann's apartment was outside the main complex and on a street.

My interest in the case was piqued because of the total control of british news that has been part of all home-based reporting, with the BBC assuring us that they have been careful to be in touch with the Mccann PR machine . It has taken 100 days for any british journalist to actually measure the distance from the Tapas bar to their apartment ...one example.
hiddenite
 
Posts: 203
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:39 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby blanc » Fri Aug 17, 2007 1:56 pm

I could not read the link in Tal's post so forgive me if this is a repeat nugget. Lippens was named by separate witnesses in the Dutroux affair. The testimony (never mediatised and effectively suppressed) was sickening. It was also credible.

I don't want to join in the smear the McCann's frenzy. Its been going on since day one. We just had a nice spate of innuendo over the blood found in the appartment. No-one ever wants the victims to keep on shouting, and if they do they get any amount of flack.

To me, whether or not they were wise to leave the children unattended is irrelevant until proved otherwise. By which I mean, unless you can prove complicity pipe down. What is relevant is that a structure is in place to allow criminals profiting from child abduction and abuse to continue unmolested by the law.

No parent, please please believe me if you are one, can safeguard their child by being with them ALL of the time. Predatory gangs who decide to acquire a certain child are not just passing by. There will be times you leave your child while you take a shower, bring the shopping in from the car, install a sibling in the car seat, answer the door, fetch in the washing. You sleep, you get ill, you can be helped to get ill or have an accident.The only way of improving the situation is by relentless pressure on govts to do something about these predators, and the McCanns have done a fair bit on that score. Should we not be asking the authorities awkward questions instead of lecturing the bereft on their parenting skills?
blanc
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 4:00 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby HMKGrey » Fri Aug 17, 2007 3:01 pm

Sunny asked:

HMKGrey, do you have young children? This got my attention:


Yes, I do and both my wife and I remain mortified by the stupidity of the McCann's in leaving them alone in the room. We would never do that. Hell, I even lock my front door from the outside if I leave early in the morning and they're all asleep. You just don't take RISKS. And that's what the McCann's did they decided to take a risk. And they probably got sloppier within that risk as the week went on (because they were doing it and getting away with it) and because dinner with friends meant they were probably having some wine and relaxing and I'd bet that time between checks of the children stretched out a bit...

In a nut shell: fucking idiots. And I find it hard to have any sympathy whatsoever.

I thought that article was weak. I definitely wasn't trying to defend the McCann's.

Their "it was like having dinner in the garden" excuse is patent BS unless it speaks to their stupidity.

I just don't necessarily buy the bigger conspiracy argument here.
HMKGrey
 
Posts: 666
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 6:56 pm
Location: West Coast
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby archie » Fri Aug 17, 2007 3:21 pm

From today's Correio da Manhã

SHAME - Moita Flores - Criminologist

Yesterday, most of the British newspapers have demonstrated up to satiation what are the lack of scruples, the professional indignity and the lack of shame by unblushingly lying. They have published reports for a wide range of tastes. The British laboratories have corroborated the blood belongs to the child, they haven´t, the police has confirmed she is dead, it was unsure she is, in short, a procession of inventions.

Manipulation has been intense, speculation hallucinating. But if we already have lost our naiveté
and we are convinced that journalism is a job that doesn´t request to be a genius but rather a serious and discerning professional, what is the explanation of that greediness of lies delivered by the British press, with that mixture of offences towards either the police or the Portuguese media ?

Let me speculate. I guess there is only one end to the shame we have witnessed. To protect someone who has to be politically protected, to lift up smokescreens to discredit any solution not being the hypothesis of an abduction. Throw to the pyre of suspicion, doubt, each and every news, fact or information that could involve someone who disturbs his public and political steps. There are too many false news to be just a conjoncture and not to be a planned strategy. And now, when the procession is still going to the churchyard and the pyre can already be seen, the PJ has to be careful. If the procession follows the way it seems to take, either it manages to resist, and the only way to resist is to show the truth, or it will be destroyed by the power of mystification that the collusion of interests in that case is producing.

Ontem, a maioria da imprensa britânica mostrou até à saciedade aquilo que é a falta de escrúpulos, a indignidade profissional e a falta de vergonha em mentir sem pudor. Produziram notícias para todos os gostos. Que os laboratórios ingleses comprovavam que o sangue era da criança, que não comprovavam, que a polícia garantia que estava morta, que não se sabia se estava morta, enfim, uma procissão de invenções.
A manipulação tem sido intensa, a especulação desvairada. Mas se já perdemos a ingenuidade e acreditamos que o jornalismo é trabalho que não exige que se seja génio mas tão-só profissional sério e criterioso, o que explica esta sofreguidão de mentiras que a imprensa inglesa tem debitado, com insultos à mistura quer à Polícia, quer à Imprensa portuguesa?
Deixem-me especular. Creio que a vergonha a que temos assistido só tem um fim. Proteger alguém que politicamente interessa proteger, levantar cortinas de fumo para descredibilizar qualquer solução para o caso que não seja a hipótese de rapto. Atirar para a fogueira da suspeição, da dúvida, toda e qualquer notícia, facto ou informação que possa envolver alguém que tolha os seus passos públicos e políticos. São notícias falsas a mais para ser uma conjuntura e não ser uma estratégia desenhada. E agora, quando ainda a procissão vai no adro e já se vê o foguetório, a PJ que se cuide. Se a procissão for pelo caminho que parece levar ou consegue resistir, e a única forma de resistir é mostrar a verdade, ou será desfeita pelo poder de mistificação que o conluio de interesses sobre este caso está a produzir.

Moita Flores, Criminologista
archie
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 2:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby archie » Fri Aug 17, 2007 3:27 pm

The following newspaper article was originally released in the Portuguese Expresso/Unica, June 9 2007 edition. It is an article written by Paulo Paixao with the collaboration of Eunice Goes (in London), Carlos Rodrigues Lima, Maria Barbosa, Raquel Moleiro and Rui Gustavo. The link is no longer active because it's been over a month since it was originally printed.

Behind the scene of the search for Maddie

How the search for Madeleine McCann became the most emotional case ever. A family effort, served by a discrete and effective machine:

During the first week after Madeleine McCann went missing, Brian and Jane Kennedy, the girl’s great-uncle and great-aunt, went twice a day to the central square of Rothley, the village close to Leicester, in central England, where Maddie’s parents live. They were the face that the many journalists on location wanted for their live transmissions. On the day that marked a week after the kidnapping, Brian, a former teacher at the local catholic school, invited “Expresso” for a cup of tea at his home. When our reporters were making an introduction about the newspaper they work for, they were surprised to discover that their hosts knew the facts about Portuguese press. On those days, the daily news was UK criticism about the performance of the Policia Judiciaria. Brian Kennedy wanted just one message to get through: “The Portuguese need to know that the things the British ‘media’ are printing about your country’s investigators does not reflect our family’s opinion.”

Message delivered, mission accomplished for Maddie’s relatives. This behaviour – with “Expresso” just like with other media – is a matrix for “Team McCann”. Since the very early hours of this family tragedy, Gerry and Kate McCann, the missing child’s parents, concentrated their energies on a campaign that surprises through its sophistication. “The way they have handled the media is very professional, creative and talented”, explains Shemi Orgad, a specialist in media issues at the London School of Economics, in London.

Even press veterans, like “Observer” journalist Ned Tempko, are surprised. “They are clearly determined to avoid that this case turns into another missing girl story. They are aware that they nead to supply a headline, not only every day but for each news cycle”, he says.

“Every day there were things that weren’t new, but that were attractive”, Felisbela Lopes, a teacher for Communication at the University of Minho (PT) points out. “Everything was done by the British ‘media’ and the Portuguese went in tow. Sometimes this led to funny episodes: when there was no information, they interviewed the foreigners.”

The McCann’s drama opened TV news all over the world, made the the front page of leading newspapers, generated solidarity reactions from politicias, entrepreneurs, sportsmen, artists, and mainly millions and millions of anonymous citizens. But the echo this case generated was not only due to the way the media work. In effect, the McCanns have a powerful machine on their side, with extensions that are not always visible for public opinion. Built on friends and family, “Team McCann” is divided into two groups. One is based in Praia da Luz and the other one in John McCann’s (Gerry’s brothers) house, in the scottish city of Glasgow.

The campaign was also divided into different phases. On a first moment, Madeleine’s family counted on the services of Alex Woolfall, the director of PR firm Ball Pottinger. Woolfall, who worked previously with the international company Monsanto during the transgenic food crisis, was hired by Mark Warner (the company that owns the resort in Praia da Luz). This assessor “filtered” all the contacts. There were journalists who approached the couple directly – and they didn’t even answer. To find anything out, the media representatives could go only one way: to leave a message on the spokesman’s cell phone. He only replied when there was an interest.

Woolfall was replaced by Sheryl Dodd, nominated by the Foreign Office, who spent less time in the Algarve. Sherry naturally preferred the journalists that were fellow countrymen. She scheduled meetings with them in bars at Praia da Luz. That is how she kept them tied to the case. Always ready to give them a word to avoid that someone became restless.

In the Algarve, the McCann have now at their service the advice from Clarence Mitchell, an ex-BBC journalist, who coordinates all activity. He works as a press advisor at the Cabinet Office (the institution that coordinates all the ministries of British Government). The specific office Mitchell belongs to, the Media Monitoring Unit, is one of the various organizations that are connected to Downing Street’s communication directory. It was Mitchell who organised and coordinated the McCann’s visits to Rome, Madrid and other European cities. Meanwhile, the couple hired a campaign manager, whose salary will be paid through the fund that was created to support the search for Maddie.

The McCanns also count on the support of various communications agencies, particularly Zenith Optimedia, HSC and the North-American BBH, who united their efforts to obtain the right to broadcast free adverts on Madeleine in various world televisions, as John Chase, the CEO of Zenith Optimedia told “Expresso”. This agency has already obtained the agreement of British TV channels ITV, Channel 5, a digital channel of Channel Four and the North-American CNBC to broadcast videos of the little girl.

The efforts of Team McCann and these professionals have produced extraordinary results. For example, a general practitioner from Aberdeen, who is a family friend, rallied support from oil corporations BP and Exxon for the campaign. These companies are exhibiting a Madeleine poster in petrol stations all over Europe.

It was due to the efforts of a cardiologist friend of Gerry McCann, Stuart Hillis, who worked with the Scottish national soccer team and with Alex Ferguson – Manchester United’s manager – that the world of sports got involved in the campaign. Through half a dozen phone calls, Hillis obtained the cooperation of Cristiano Ronaldo, David Beckham, John Terry and Jose Mourinho. The FA – the British Football Association – also offered to join the efforts. After seeing Madeleine’s video being broadcast at the UEFA Cup final game, in Glasgow, the FA contacted Government officials in order to show their availability to help the family. Thus, the same appeal was seen by over 500 million people, in 160 countries, before the final game for the Cup of England that took place in the new Wembley Stadium, and during the break. And two weeks ago a photograph was taken with the British National Team players behind a poster for Madeleine.

The efforts of Philomena McCann (Gerry’s sister) were crucial to mobilize british politicians. Philomena contacted her local representative, Muhammed Sarwar, who answered immediately. With Sarwar’s help, Philomena visited the british Parliament, contacted several ministers and deputies and distributed hundreds of yellow bracelets (symbols of hope). On that day, very few deputies chose not to wear it. Gordon Brown, who is to become prime minister soon, was not present at the Chamber of Commons, but he called Gerry McCann several times to offer his help. It was through a request from Brown, while still Chancellor of the Treasury, that British officials advised the McCanns to transform the “Madeleine Fund” into a foundation, so they could benefit from fiscal advantages. In this solidarity chain, the Princes of Wales also sent the family a support message.

The media campaign to keep Maddie in the public eye also benefited from many spontaneous actions from private entities, organizations and personalities. By the end of May, 200 British radio stations decided to launch an appeal. At a pre-arranged time, they played the song “Don’t you forget about me” by Simple Minds. Millionaires like Richard Branson, JK Rowling, Philip Green and Stephen Winyard offered a joint reward of 2,5 million pounds (3.7 million Euros) for anyone who offers the right clue to Maddie’s whereabouts. And the Maddie McCann Fund has received almost a million Euros already.

From day one, the control by Team McCann, of all the images and information – under the leadership of the British media, whom the Portuguese didn’t dare to defy – was crucial for the “snowball effect” that this case became. At the beginning of the week after Maddie vanished, on May 3, already the steps of the McCann family seemed to follow a script that left little room for improvisation. Every morning, between 8 and 8.30 am, the girl’s father, either alone or in the company of relatives, left the apartment holding hands with Sean and Amelie (his twin children) and entered the Ocean Club’s reception. This moment, which lasted less than one minute, marked the beginning of yet another news day at Praia da Luz – although there was nothing to inform.

As time went by, it became increasingly frequent to see Gerry and Kate walking hand in hand towards the church at Praia da Luz. A walk that was sporadic in the beginning and became a daily routine, scheduled for 6 pm, allowing the journalists to capture new images they could then broadcast on the evening news.

With the lack of news about the ongoing investigation, the couple’s visit to the local church became a routine. Their spiritual orientation gained an increasingly relevant role in the McCann’s daily life – and the journalist’s. Just as it was with the couple’s visits to Fatima and the Vatican.

If in the first days Gerry and Kate allowed their spokesperson to transmit the information, slowly they began to speak to the reporters directly, and answering questions. As time went by, the couple’s proximity to the media increased.

“Everything the McCanns do – visits to church, walks on the beach, visits to the Pope, the broadcasting of photos or videos of Madeleine – is focussed on keeping the story alive. Apart from that, they delivered artificial stories when there was a lack of news concerning the police investigation”, says Shemi Orgad.
Felisbela Lopes explains the “media machine” operation from the visit to the Pope. For days, the advisors worked on the notion, which was then transmitted by the media that Kate and Gerry would get a private audience with the Pope. It turned out that they were just sitting in the front row at Saint Peter’s Square, along with dozens of other people. But the image that was broadcast was the Pope blessing a picture of Madeleine. And some of the photos (close-up images) almost gave us the idea of a private meeting. “In some cases, the journalists managed not to report what they saw on location”, the communications professor from Universidade do Minho says.

It was through moments like those, that the most broadcast and commented family drama case was built. Several observers are unanimous as they list the ingredients of the media success this case has been: a pretty child, two pretty twin siblings, good-looking parents with successful careers, spending holidays abroad, in a sort of fairytale where nothing bad could happen. But their worst nightmare came true. And that was a click. “As information consumers, we depend from an emotional degree, and we feel compassionate about the unbelievable pain” that this family is experiencing, Felisbela Lopes says. “This story has been kept alive because it is about people’s most common fears. A kidnapped daughter is every parent’s worst nightmare”, says Orgad.

For all this “there is no record of such mediatisation in Europe or abroad”, says the University of Minho professor. “The phenomenon’s dimension has surprised me”, says Fernando Nobre, the founding doctor of International Medical Assistance, who has a vast experience of catastrophe situations all over the world- and who often needs to alert the public to situations that are not always front-page news. “I think the response of the anonymous citizen was provoked by the media response”, Nobre says. “Many televisions say they obey their audiences, but it’s the media who induce certain behaviours in people”, he adds. And looking at the planetary dimension of the phenomenon, the doctor recognizes “the weight of the Anglo-Saxon media”, whose agenda sets the rules.

In this “circular information process”, as Felisbela Lopes calls it, in which “the parents rapidly took advantage of the snowball effect”, the role of traditional media is not the only one, and not the most decisive either. The campaign has been well thought about, and it covers new technologies (where Philomena McCann plays an important part). “The use of internet and chain messages, per mail or SMS, are formats that invite people to participate in the McCann’s pain”, Shemi Orgad says.

But in spite of their apparent capacity to handle the media, “the phenomenon is not a result of control, but of chaos – with the control of the information in the hands of the receiver, not of the emitter”, says Carlos Coelho, a brand manager and Ivity’s president. The professional content producers have opened up to the “social media”, the amateur producers. Maddie’s story revealed “the consumer’s power, through a vehicle of planetary dimension, such as the Internet”, says this marketing specialist.

“Usually the passive receiver of a message, the citizen has become part of an active army that mobilizes for a cause”, Carlos Coelho says. About the moment or episode that has projected this case in a decisive form, this brand manager has no doubts. “The mechanics of this process explains its dimension. But the decisive item is its symbol: Maddie’s photo, which nobody can resist. She is the aggregating element.”
archie
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 2:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby blanc » Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:13 am

Thanks Archie, for that excerpt from Correio de Manha, " To protect someone who has to be politically protected" - is bang on.
blanc
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 4:00 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby 11:11 » Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:14 am

I actually spent a good deal of time away from the web, building a boulder garden, admiring the huge variety of bees attracted to the plants, feeling all connected to the good in life, then, for whatever reason, just had to check in on the seedy underbelly of humanity. This sure seems to encapsulate it. Big bucks, human trafficking (?), pedophiles, and the New World Order.

I've just casually paid attention to this case, and came to the same conclusion as most - irresponsible parents in world full of perverts. Now, after reading this (and the UK blog link), it looks way more complicated than that.

Questions that come to mind:

Are the parents involved in some kind of cult conspiracy, or have they been taken advantage of BY the cult? Is the cult protecting it's own worldwide child abduction racket, or are the parents in on it, for some kind of psyops reason?

Why would the Portugese be intimidated by the British press?

Has there been any mention of any forensic evidence - blood, fingerprints, hair, anything?
11:11
 
Posts: 1570
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 7:45 am
Location: Michigan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby 11:11 » Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:38 am

Child Focus, or the European Center for Missing and Sexually Exploited Children, was founded in 1998 by Daniel Cardon de Lichtbuer and headed by this person ever since. In 2005, de Lichtbuer became chairman of the International Centre for Missing and Exploited Children (ICMEC), headquartered in Washington and founded in 1999. Who is this Lichtbuer? First of all, he is quite big in the financial world, with former positions in Banque Bruxelles Lambert, the Belgian Bankers' Association, VP Bank Liechtenstein (with Nikolaus von Liechtenstein), Thomas Cook Traveller Cheques and the European Financial Marketing Association. He also has been executive president of the aristocratic Europa Nostra. But things become really problematic upon reading that de Lichtbuer is a member of the honorary committee of Cercle de Lorraine, together with with Maurice Lippens and Etienne Davignon. Equally worrying is his position as honorary executive president of the Koninklijke Vereniging der Historische Woonsteden en Tuinen van België, together with prince Alexander de Merode (former chair) and Count Ghislain d'Ursel. Davignon used to be a board member too. There's another indication that de Lichtbuer might not be the best choice for an anti- child abuse organization: 1998, Stef Janssens, 'The names from the cover up', p. 33: "In 1989, [Nicolas] de Kerchove d'Ousselghem [CEPIC; chef de cabinet of Vanden Boeynants; contact of VdB to the PIO intelligence organization] and Paul Vankerkhoven, CEPIC member and co-founder of Cercle des Nations [among many other things]... were employees of the magazine 'Revue Belge'. This right-wing magazine had as manager the present director of the Center for Missing Children and former BBL-director Daniel Cardon de Lichtbuer. What in itself is not reprehensible, but does say something about the milieu in which the present director of this Center was involved with." To clarify, that milieu appears to be the highest level child abuse milieu.

How many child oriented NGOs have people like this in charge? I'll bet a lot. I think someone like Marc Klass should read this. I often wonder just how much a guy like he is exposed to, and think he could be clueless about the BIG picture. He and John Walsh, who are so focused on better cooperation in law enforcent, and harsher sentencing, could very well even be having meetings with the very people they're after.
11:11
 
Posts: 1570
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 7:45 am
Location: Michigan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby archie » Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:10 am

11.11 - there is forensics - blood and other traces from the apartment and various vehicles, but this is not yet revealed.

Another interesting Portugese report:


in Correio da Manha 14/05/07

http://www.correiodamanha.pt/n.....81&p=0

Madeleine: Diplomacy pressures PJ
PJ forced to investigate kidnapping lead

Alípio Ribeiro, national director of PJ, received a call from John Buck, the british ambassador in Portugal, on the night Madeleine disapeared from the Ocean Club, on May 3.

Around 11 p.m., approximately two hours after the child's disppearance had been communicated to the police, Alípio Ribeiro had to interrupt a private dinner in order to listen to the diplomat. That phone call was the first sign that the british were very keen on accompanying the PJ’s actions very closely, and in forcing the investigations to follow the abduction theory.

“The PJ lost too much time investigating the abduction”, a source connected to the investigation told CM. The pressure of the british diplomacy apparently only slowed down after the arrival in Portugal of british police agents who gave support to the redirectioning of the investigation to the possibility of murder. The biological evidence found in the apartment were decisive in the changing the inquiry's direction, or, at least, for the PJ to admit that change publicly.

The decision to further investigate the possibility of the child's death in the Ocean Club – and in consequence the re-evaluation of the depositions made by the parents and their friends – was also taken taking the opinions of the british police agents into consideration. The interview that Olegário Sousa gave yesterday to BBC and ITN was done in accordance with those agents.

The choice of these two television channels was motivated by the indignation that the british agents themselves felt regarding the accusations that have been made by the british press to the PJ. The BBC and ITN have been treating this case with more distance and impartiality, and that was the reason for which they were privileged tothe interview.

Olegário Sousa admitted for the first time in public the possibility of Madeleine being dead. A position that leaves the McCanns at the center of the investigations, a situation that is being managed "with soft gloves" by the portuguese police.

The couple has benefitted from the help of powerful friends. The first spokesperson for the McCanns, Clarence Mitchell, who organized the several trips Maddie's parents did into various countries, is now an aide of Gordon Brown.

Brown supported the Maddie cause from the begining, because Jill Renwick, a long time friend of the couple, is a neighbour of John Brown, brother of the british prime-minister.
__________________[/quote]
archie
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 2:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby archie » Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:16 am

Lots of info here:

http://forums.mirror.co.uk/viewforum.php?f=31


if you have time to wade through the dross
archie
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 2:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests