Uh-oh, another Stadium gig..

[yesferatu]

Yesterday it was announced scientists have finally gotten a handle on how to direct hurricanes.

Do you have a link for this, please?

I read it. It was a "reputable" news outlet...not some obscure site. Might have even been Drudge. Hope I don't have to come back empty-handed because I KNOW I read it yesterday.

Anyone else want to find it and beat me to it is welcome. Don't wait for me if you know where to link it.

[Uncle $cam]

Wasn't the whole stadium thing a Pinochet idea?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/807599.stm

[FourthBase]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jh ... orm121.xml

Scientists a step closer to steering hurricanes
By Tim Shipman in Washington
Last Updated: 2:38am BST 24/10/2007

Scientists have made a breakthrough in man's desire to control the forces of nature – unveiling plans to weaken hurricanes and steer them off course, to prevent tragedies such as Hurricane Katrina.

Get this:

Moshe Alamaro, of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), told The Sunday Telegraph of his plans to "paint" the tops of hurricanes black by scattering carbon particles – either soot or black particles from the manufacture of tyres – from aircraft flying above the storms. The particles would absorb heat from the sun, leading to changes in the airflows within the storm. Satellites could also heat the cloud tops by beaming microwaves from space.

[mentalgongfu2]

I read it. It was a "reputable" news outlet...not some obscure site. Might have even been Drudge. Hope I don't have to come back empty-handed because I KNOW I read it yesterday.

I heard mention of said story from the illustrious Rush Limbaugh, so it must be out in ether of the "drive by media" somewhere.

[yesferatu]

Yesterday it was announced scientists have finally gotten a handle on how to direct hurricanes.

Do you have a link for this, please?

I read it. It was a "reputable" news outlet...not some obscure site. Might have even been Drudge. Hope I don't have to come back empty-handed because I KNOW I read it yesterday.

Anyone else want to find it and beat me to it is welcome. Don't wait for me if you know where to link it.

Is The Telegraph reputable? The Tele is always used for revealing "new" black technologies that are decades old, and the articles are couched in the language of breaking news.

I did not need the Tele to confirm what I knew. There are good physical proofs of man-made anomalies during the Katrina path.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/10/21/wstorm121.xml

I love this:
<<In the wake of Katrina, two rival teams of climate scientists are working on ways to steer hurricanes, so as to be able to avoid direct hits on major cities in the future. >>

hahahahaha....of course...they are just now developing this, donchaknow!

To prevent other New Orleans' donchaknow?

<<Both teams are using the technique of removing power and speed from strategic points in the hurricane, effectively refracting its path. The American team is approaching this by warming the areas of the tops of the hurricane clouds, either by dropping ash to absorb heat from the sun, or directly beaming microwaves on those areas from space. The Israeli team is taking the approach of cooling the bottom of the hurricane by releasing dust along its base. The concern is raised of lawsuits from the small towns that hurricanes are directed towards in the effort to avoid large cities. But if the space-based solution could be done efficiently, and applied to all large tropical storms, couldn't we one day send them all harmlessly into the North Atlantic?>>

[mentalgongfu2]

So have They just better learned to control HAARP this year or did they decide to lay off for a season? After that landmark hurricane season in 05, things seem to have been relatively quiet.

[Uncle $cam]

Anyway, anyone find it interesting that a few years after the tower collapse suddenly they (scientists) find a break though in unmanned flight? Now a few years after Katrina, they a step closer to steering hurricanes?

Not that I am attached to any of these ideals, however I do find it odd.

Oh and that Schwarzenegger remark:

"The people are happy. They have everything here," Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger declared Monday night after his second Qualcomm tour.

Sounds beautifully close to Babs Bush's stunner,

"And so many of the people in the arena here, you know, were underprivileged anyway, so this--this (she chuckles slightly) is working very well for them."

[yesferatu]

<<Both teams are using the technique of removing power and speed from strategic points in the hurricane, effectively refracting its path. The American team is approaching this by warming the areas of the tops of the hurricane clouds, either by dropping ash to absorb heat from the sun, or directly beaming microwaves on those areas from space. The Israeli team is taking the approach of cooling the bottom of the hurricane by releasing dust along its base. The concern is raised of lawsuits from the small towns that hurricanes are directed towards in the effort to avoid large cities. But if the space-based solution could be done efficiently, and applied to all large tropical storms, couldn't we one day send them all harmlessly into the North Atlantic?>>

Gosh, why is Israel involved?

At least when they squeak black ops, they correctly identify Israemerika.

When will they squeak the black technology that pulverizes enormous masses of hardened concrete into fine powder in mere seconds?

[Et in Arcadia ego]

Both those articles are low tech stuff I'm not interested in. I was looking more for an admission of HAARP's utility.

It hasn't escaped my attention that we haven't had jack shit in the way of Hurricanes since 2005 when we should have had multiple pulverizations take place.

I think 2005 was a massive laboratory for fine tuning the real apparatus. There's never been anything even remotely like 2005's activity level. The only major hurricanes to spawn this year all went into Mexico.

Just like last year.

[Et in Arcadia ego]

On CNN's main page:

FEMA vows action

wtf.

What's that supposed to mean?

[yesferatu]

Both those articles are low tech stuff I'm not interested in. I was looking more for an admission of HAARP's utility.

wtf...ya asked me for a link.
Just "low tech stuff I'm not interested in."
oh gee, sorry.
Black technology reported in the msm is so boring.

[Et in Arcadia ego]

Black technology reported in the msm is so boring.

Don't take it personal, I didn;'t mean it that way.

Dumping shredded tires from a plane to dim sunlight is about as low tech as it gets, and the tire pieces themselves are about the only black involved.

Now when you want to start talking about how Wilma went from an unassuming Tropical Storm to a Cat 6(yes, I meant 6, not 5) Hurricane in less than 12 hours, lemme know, cause whatever did that is the real black tech..

Oh, and whenever you want to explain this as well, feel free:

[FourthBase]

Both those articles are low tech stuff I'm not interested in. I was looking more for an admission of HAARP's utility.

It hasn't escaped my attention that we haven't had jack shit in the way of Hurricanes since 2005 when we should have had multiple pulverizations take place.

I think 2005 was a massive laboratory for fine tuning the real apparatus. There's never been anything even remotely like 2005's activity level. The only major hurricanes to spawn this year all went into Mexico.

Just like last year.

Did you miss this, Et?

Satellites could also heat the cloud tops by beaming microwaves from space.

Sounds like this, what you posted:

[vigilant]

I didn't record these news broadcasts during the storm, but I saw them, and it wasn't lost on me what was being alluded to. >>Weather control, and it was obvious that the media knew "something" was up. I was studying hurricaine control around this time too, so I was extra vigilant about the coverage...

Larry King was talking to a reporter in the New Orleans area. They were doing the typical "reporter swaying in the wind" type of report. I think the reporter was the same one that does "Keeping Them Honest" with CNN. (Can't remember his name right now) He was having trouble hearing Larry because of the wind, so Larry repeated the same question three times before the reporter finally heard him and responded. What was the question Larry asked?

Larry: "Is this a natural storm?"
Reporter: "Sorry Larry, I didn't catch that."
Larry: " I asked if this was a natural storm?"
Reporter: "Sorry Larry, I still didn't hear you."
Larry: "I was asking if this was a natural storm?"
Reporter: "Uhhh, yes Larry, this is a natural storm."

The storm they were referring to was a spin off of Katrina. A storm that was caused by Katrina that was threatening to far inland into Alabama. I was living in Alabama at the time. Larry was asking if the storm was caused by artificial manipulation, or a natural spinoff of Katrina, in my opinion....

Because what other kinds of storms are we "supposed" to be having, if they are not NATURAL???

Also.........

Also Kofi Annan ,when he was head of the United Nations, said on national television, exactly this, and I did not hear it wrong either...he said

"Hurricaine season could have been completely avoided this year had President Bush been more cooperative".....no kiddin, he said it..

Lou Dobbs on CNN responded to what Kofi said

Lou Dobbs..."Uhh, not sure exactly what Kofi Annan meant by that, but perhaps we will get further clarification"

I heard these things during Katrina, as clear as a bell. I pointed them out to my wife (now ex wife) and she was totally confused. She didn't understand weather modification. These statements went completely over her head until I pointed them out to her. I am sure they went right over the head of most of America too....

Can this stuff be looked up on Lexus Nexus? I have tried to find these quotes on the internet because I wanted to save them, but I was never able to find them....

[Et in Arcadia ego]

Did you miss this, Et?

Satellites could also heat the cloud tops by beaming microwaves from space.

That is a rather provocative one-liner, eh?



Seem to be the kinda thing you'd expect them to elaborate one a bit more. That's definitely the 800-pound gorilla in the room in that article..