

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
Doodad wrote:8bitagent wrote:Doodad wrote:8bitagent wrote: I will not gloss over the alarming connections of Israeli security firms and Mossad to 9/11.
The point is, what exactly has been proven and is more than just bad jacketing and innuendo? Christ, to hear some tell it, every single Israeli who ever was in the States is a fucking Mossad agent. Do you not see how absurd that has become sans any REAL proof of anything?
Like how every Muslim charity is "al Qaeda"
The problem lies when so many mainstream reports quote CIA officials citing Mossad had penetrated American networks in 2000-2001, and even Mossad trying to say they penetrated al Qaeda, and warned the CIA.
Im PERFECTLY willing to say Israel's role may have been to STOP 9/11
We know the first victim of 9/11 was Daniel Lewin, shot in the face by one of the hijackers on flight 11. Lewin's company was Akamai(which runs myspace, defense company sites, etc) and Lewin was a top anti hijacker commando.
Because I talk about Nick Berg, Mossad, Israeli communications, Israeli spies, Israeli security all involved in 9/11...involved doesnt mean evil.
But you see, you are still being general; not nailing it down. This allows the creeps in. Espionage among allies goes on all the time around the world; it's the nature of the beast. Somehow this is forgotten when 911 is mentioned and it becomes some whisper campaign disguised as a smoking gun. people who would never believe a word they CIA says suddenly believes if it if someone says they saw a document etc etc.
Doodad wrote:smiths wrote:careful jeffDoes that mean I'm guilty of "division"? I hope the fuck so.
clearly you are talking about a bigger tent, but my fear is that the smaller tent closer to home is being divided,
attempts to keep neo-nazis away are admirable but i cant help feeling that the baby is getting thrown with the bathwater,
especially when the most divisive poster on the board - doodad - seems clearly emboldened by what looks like tacit approval from the gracious host,
i for one am intelligent and sensative enough to know the difference between a critique of israeli actions in lebanon for instance,
and an anti-semitic hit-piece masquarading as a critique of israeli actions
in short we are adults, not children
please consider
You and GM citizen have said basically the same thing here; that somehow I am getting preferential treatment and being "allowed," to do something which is somehow nefarious.
This is of course absurd.
My question in return would have to be why the two of you hold so dear the right to have such tripe continue to be respectable. Because that it is surely what it seems like.
"Emboldened," implies I was scared to say something. My history here should put the lie to that canard.
Doodad wrote:8bitagent wrote: I will not gloss over the alarming connections of Israeli security firms and Mossad to 9/11.
The point is, what exactly has been proven and is more than just bad jacketing and innuendo? Christ, to hear some tell it, every single Israeli who ever was in the States is a fucking Mossad agent. Do you not see how absurd that has become sans any REAL proof of anything?
GM Citizen wrote:Ok, so the guy has some serious issues.
1) His role as an 911 truther should not paint other 911'ers with his stain.
2) Holocaust denial is yet another lousy label, sometimes used to paint/taint folks that merely question the numbers, and not the acts. (See: anti-semite, nazi, etc)
3) By him saying "Zionist crime network running horrendous crimes" does not negate the possibility of that being true.
Thus, he has been labelled, tarred and feathered, and everything coming out of him is therefore no good.
Now understand this: I am NOT saying he is good. But any facts/truths he may have unearthed are pretty much rendered useless.
OnoI812 wrote:Benjamin's mother in Pelham, New York, however, was more willing to talk. Asked if Benjamin was related to the new Secretary of Homeland Security, Judy said, "Yes, of course, he is a cousin."
Ben can say anything he wants after the fact, he took no part in the phone conversation, nor did he record it...
Timeline
Jones asks..gets a "no" reply
Bollyn goes around gatekeepers- gets a "Yes" reply
Ben Chertoff answers, gives a "maybe" reply, but assures us it doesn't matter anyway, because there was no funny business, honest...
Horatio Hellpop wrote:I may be. I emphasise that it is only the impression I get and somewhat influenced by the political position you take. And these kind of accusations are hard to defend one's self from.... if you know what I'm saying......
Horatio Hellpop wrote:I think my point went over your head. Let me spell it out....even though you seem to be aligned with the Israeli's re: the Middle East conflict - it is wrong of me to suggest that this automatically means you are anti-Arab/Islam. Now can you relate that to anything???
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 153 guests