I am JFK's love child, B.C. man says

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Postby FourthBase » Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:02 pm

Also, not just JFK's face via reading assassination books since the age of 10, but I've grown up around Kennedy-type faces all my life, and have seen Kennedy faces more than most of you from my local newspapers and local newscasts. I've spent entire days at the JFK library (mostly researching Hemingway). This young guy my dad's family knew in Southie named Brian looked just like a Kennedy, JFK even, except with a tiny hint of FAS (there's, um, a lot of that kind of look in Southie). All that considered: This Worthington dude looks really really really really legit.
“Joy is a current of energy in your body, like chlorophyll or sunlight,
that fills you up and makes you naturally want to do your best.” - Bill Russell
User avatar
FourthBase
 
Posts: 7057
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 4:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby IanEye » Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:08 pm

Image

I watched with glee
While your kings and queens
Fought for ten decades
For the gods they made....
User avatar
IanEye
 
Posts: 4865
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 10:33 pm
Blog: View Blog (29)

Postby FourthBase » Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:12 pm

Sigh.
“Joy is a current of energy in your body, like chlorophyll or sunlight,
that fills you up and makes you naturally want to do your best.” - Bill Russell
User avatar
FourthBase
 
Posts: 7057
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 4:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby chiggerbit » Wed Feb 13, 2008 5:41 pm

Oh, well, maybe I shouldn't give an opinion, as I have face blindness. But he does remind me of Jack when he was younger.
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby sunny » Wed Feb 13, 2008 7:10 pm

OK, that photo just clinches it. This thing is being stage-managed to the nth degree. We are in for a 'big reveal'. What does this guy actually have to say? Whatever it is, he's not some innocent being swept along with the tide of history.

These things always start in the tabloids, then spread to the 'legit' press, in this case Vanity Fair. Why was the tabloid allowed to scoop VF? Is there a reason it has to get out right now?
Choose love
sunny
 
Posts: 5220
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Alabama
Blog: View Blog (1)

Postby streeb » Wed Feb 13, 2008 8:49 pm

It might be worth remembering that in 97 Vanity Fair ran Liz Smith's garbage interview with Judith Exner (when she claimed she'd been impregnated by JFK).
User avatar
streeb
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 9:19 pm
Location: Zona, BC
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby sunny » Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:04 pm

streeb wrote:It might be worth remembering that in 97 Vanity Fair ran Liz Smith's garbage interview with Judith Exner (when she claimed she'd been impregnated by JFK).


Oh, absolutely. Whatever the info that will have a "profound impact" you can bet it will be detrimental to the reputation of JFK. As Hugh always says, this is disinfo season. They bring this crap up during these times because, er, if they trash him the masses won't care why he was murdered? Not really, but it works on media types who might look a little closer.
Choose love
sunny
 
Posts: 5220
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Alabama
Blog: View Blog (1)

Postby streeb » Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:38 pm

They bring this crap up during these times because, er, if they trash him the masses won't care why he was murdered? Not really


Do you mean, in spite of the crap, the masses do still actually care why he was murdered?

'Cause my first thought when I read your post was that, yeah, people stopped caring about that a long time ago. The post-assassination character-assassination did and continues to work swimmingly, to the extent that most people automatically think JFK='dirty slut' before they even think JFK='murdered'. I think they won that war a long time ago, yet it goes on and on... The obsessive impulse to stick it to Kennedy seems to echo the crazed obsession with Castro and Cuba that pitted certain establishment people against him in the first place. I agree with Jeff when he said that we don't need a hagiography, but has any other President had the scale tipped so steeply against him?
User avatar
streeb
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 9:19 pm
Location: Zona, BC
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby sunny » Wed Feb 13, 2008 10:14 pm

streeb wrote:... that war... goes on and on...


Sorry to edit you so severely, but there is a reason it goes on and on-it has not worked to date. Have you noticed that around 80% of the public believe JFK was killed by a government conspiracy? This despite the media throwing everything at him and never once mentioning the myriad smoking guns that destroy the official version. Throwing dirt at JFK and telling lies about the evidence is all they have. And it still doesn't work.

The obsessive impulse to stick it to Kennedy seems to echo the crazed obsession with Castro and Cuba that pitted certain establishment people against him in the first place. I agree with Jeff when he said that we don't need a hagiography, but has any other President had the scale tipped so steeply against him?


No. Kennedy was arrogant to the point of cocksureness, highly intelligent, sophistacated, bold, charismatic, and women loved him. He was everything the dark dwelling roaches fantasized being, and he was using all his gifts to try and destroy their carefully construced power structure. He had to pay, and he has to continue paying.
Choose love
sunny
 
Posts: 5220
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Alabama
Blog: View Blog (1)

Postby streeb » Wed Feb 13, 2008 11:23 pm

Sorry to edit you so severely, but there is a reason it goes on and on-it has not worked to date. Have you noticed that around 80% of the public believe JFK was killed by a government conspiracy?


Yep, I have noticed that, but I've also noticed that it's followed by indifference, or - as I experienced just the other day - it's followed by a statement like, "Well, JFK was no saint, you know..." or even worse, some lame-ass joke about Marilyn.

It seems to me it has worked, and a story like this one (whatever it really means) can be seen as a tune-up effort. But I don't know how necessary it is.
User avatar
streeb
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 9:19 pm
Location: Zona, BC
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby 8bitagent » Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:00 am

On today's Alex Jones show, he said he's currently making what he says will be the most explosive, damning and important JFK assassination film of all time...teasing that he's gonna interview and have new information that will blow people away. He said it should be out in October.

I say about darn time. To this day I have not seen a pro JFK conspiracy film that really seals the deal

RFK was sealed with the new "RFK Must Die", MLK remains untapped documentary wise, but way too many recent anti conspiracy JFK films
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12244
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Jeff » Thu Feb 14, 2008 11:09 am

Hmmm..... Anyone who compares himself to the Rosetta Stone, I have serious issues with before he says anything else.



Man who may be JFK's son follows conspiracy theorist

Jack Worthington says key to his history may lie in book by widely dismissed writer

MARSHA LEDERMAN

From Thursday's Globe and Mail

February 14, 2008 at 4:41 AM EST

The British Columbia-based man who has the world wondering whether he is the son of John F. Kennedy is a follower of a U.S. author widely dismissed as a conspiracy theorist on the Kennedy assassination.

During a wide-ranging interview this week that was short on specifics, Jack Worthington indicated to The Globe and Mail that the key to his story and how it relates to Mr. Kennedy may lie in the book Blood, Money & Power: How L.B.J. Killed J.F.K. It was written by Barr McClellan, a former attorney for president Lyndon Johnson.

In his book, Mr. McClellan suggests there was a high-level conspiracy to kill President Kennedy and that the conspiracy - and cover-up - involved Mr. Johnson, the vice-president, who succeeded Mr. Kennedy. The book also suggests the shift in power benefited rich Texas oilmen because Mr. Johnson did not decrease an oil depletion allowance.

"Behind the attorney-client shield in the deep politics of Texas, the most monstrous crime in the nation was planned, completed, covered up, and paid for with power plays that were in place long before and long after Nov. 22, 1963," the book states.

Mr. McClellan's hypothesis has been widely discounted by other historians, who accept the Warren commission's conclusion that a lone gunman killed the president.

In a meeting with The Globe, Mr. Worthington said his mother's paternal family had strong political ties to Mr. Johnson, and he stated that "the rise of LBJ and fall of JFK" were significant factors in his own story and in any possible connection to the Kennedys.

"My existence is a potential Rosetta stone for a confusing period of American history," he said, citing the ancient stone found in Egypt that has become known as a symbol for the solution to a puzzle.

The catalyst for Mr. Worthington's decision to go public was a New York Post report last week that Vanity Fair had been working for about 18 months on a story about a Vancouver man who claimed to be the son of Mr. Kennedy.

After The Globe published a story about the speculation, Mr. Worthington contacted the newspaper, saying he wanted to speak with "a respected national publication."

Mr. Worthington, 46, is from Texas but lives in B.C. He is twice divorced, and married to a woman he says is Canadian. He has been in Canada for about five months.

He insists he is not motivated by money. "I told Vanity Fair that I would sign an agreement with the Kennedys immediately, in which I agree not to pursue any financial remuneration from the JFK estate whatsoever," he told The Globe, reading from a prepared statement.

He also urged the Kennedy family to provide DNA samples so tests could be run to see if there is a match.

But Mr. Worthington refused The Globe's offer to conduct the DNA testing, saying he would prefer that all testing go through Vanity Fair.

Mr. Worthington has refused to answer several questions, including why he believes he may be connected to Mr. Kennedy. In fact, he was consistently evasive when asked directly whether he believes he is the son of the late president.

He won't say why exactly he is coming forward. Nor will he say whether he went to Vanity Fair with his claims or if the publication contacted him. Vanity Fair has not commented.

Mr. Worthington did tell The Globe that his interest in Mr. Kennedy was sparked "just recently," but beyond mentioning the book, which was published in 2003, he did not indicate where his recent interest originated.

The death of Mr. Worthington's father last May could have been a factor in his decision to go public. Jack Worthington Senior was a basketball coach and high-school administrator in Houston.

"I had an idyllic childhood," Mr. Worthington told The Globe. "I had a fantastic father-son relationship with the man who raised me."

There are some remarkable coincidences in this case: The president was assassinated on young Jack's second birthday - in Texas, where the Worthingtons lived.

And Mr. Worthington does indeed bear a striking resemblance to Mr. Kennedy.

But as much as some may be enchanted by the idea of a little bit of Camelot coming to B.C., there is no evidence at this point that Jack Worthington can carry that claim.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ ... ional/home
User avatar
Jeff
Site Admin
 
Posts: 11134
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2000 8:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby sunny » Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:53 pm

During a wide-ranging interview this week that was short on specifics, Jack Worthington indicated to The Globe and Mail that the key to his story and how it relates to Mr. Kennedy may lie in the book Blood, Money & Power: How L.B.J. Killed J.F.K. It was written by Barr McClellan, a former attorney for president Lyndon Johnson.


I haven't read Barr McClellan's book, but someone posted a link about Mac Wallace earlier in the thread and I must admit I find the infromation compelling. I think Johnson may have known in advance and he most certainly helped cover up for the perps, but I have my doubts he instigated the whole thing.

This Worthington guy is starting to sound like a cheap huckster. Spit it out already, and then STFU.
Choose love
sunny
 
Posts: 5220
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Alabama
Blog: View Blog (1)

I am JFK's love child

Postby norton ash » Thu Feb 14, 2008 8:11 pm

And I'm mightily pissed about the Addington's Disease, the syphilis and the sexual compulsion. I'm doomed.... but Viva Las Vegas!
Zen horse
User avatar
norton ash
 
Posts: 4067
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 5:46 pm
Location: Canada
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby sunny » Sat Feb 16, 2008 10:25 am

http://www.nationalpost.com/news/canada ... ?id=311294

Bush brother’s ex defends JFK’s purported love child

Denise Ryan, Canwest News Service
Published: Friday, February 15, 2008
VANCOUVER -- A Bush has come forward in defence of a possible Kennedy.

Sharon Bush, the former wife of President George W. Bush's brother Neil Bush and a close friend of Jack Worthington, has come forward exclusively to the Vancouver Sun to speak on his behalf.

"He is a fine man, highly ethical, a man of high integrity," Ms. Bush said about Worthington, rumoured to be John F. Kennedy's illegitimate son, in an interview Thursday.

Ms. Bush said she decided to speak out after a British tabloid claimed Mr. Worthington once tried to flog a book about being an illegitimate Kennedy offspring and may not be who he claims.

The tabloid is also claiming that Texas birth records show Mr. Worthington was born in January 1961 -- not, as Mr. Worthington says, on Nov. 22, two years to the day before John F. Kennedy's assassination.

It's just the sort of journalistic "blood sport" Mr. Worthington wanted to avoid.

Worthington stated simply Thursday that his birth date is a matter of public record. He also revealed that his sister was born on June 6, 1965, three years to the day before the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy.

Mr. Worthington vehemently denied having ever written, or spoken publicly, about his possible connection to the Kennedy family.

"It's outrageous. Vanity Fair approached me. They had to woo me for over six months to work with them on their story, and I only co-operated on their assurances that my anonymity would be protected."

Mr. Worthington, who moved to the Vancouver area nine months ago, said he is reeling from the attention his story is getting in the world media. He plans to come forward soon in an interview with a major U.S. network to "clear the air."

Mr. Worthington co-operated with the Vanity Fair story by David Friend, which has not yet been published, but said, "I have never claimed to be JFK's love child."

"When his mother gave him the information, just a few years ago, he was shell-shocked," said Ms. Bush. Mr. Worthington shared the information with Ms. Bush at the time in "complete confidence."

Ms. Bush said Mr. Worthington always kept his secret very well. "He only wants to know the truth."

Ms. Bush, who dated Mr. Worthington after her divorce from Neil Bush, said the resemblance is so strong, it's "stunning."

"Having been married to one president's brother, and now possibly dating another president's son, it was a little too much," she added with a laugh. They've remained close friends.

Mr. Worthington is particularly outraged by recent news reports that imply he supports Kennedy-assassination conspiracy theories.

"I am so disappointed," he told the Sun, and slammed what he called "irresponsible, poor journalism."

Mr. Worthington said he was appalled by a suggestion made Thursday in the Globe & Mail that he endorses a conspiracy theory put forward in Money & Power: How L.B.J. Killed J.F.K. by Barr McClellan. The book suggests then-vice-president Lyndon B. Johnson may have been involved in the assassination of President Kennedy, and a subsequent cover-up.

"I don't know what Vanity Fair wrote," said Mr. Worthington, who is an international investment banker, "but I've got a tremendous amount to lose here. My clients depend on me for my credibility."

It's credibility that longtime friend Sharon Bush vouches for. "He has a great reputation in Texas, he's involved in charity work. He's a great guy."

The Vancouver Sun also spoke at length with Vanity Fair reporter Mr. Friend, who contacted the Sun to get information.

He declined to comment on either the DNA testing that might support Vanity Fair's story, or on Mr. Worthington's credibility, but said he was following developments on the story with interest.

"I'm in the middle of the story," he explained. "Because we're a monthly and we're not a daily, everybody beats us."
Choose love
sunny
 
Posts: 5220
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Alabama
Blog: View Blog (1)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 166 guests