Citizen Spook:"TREASONGATE: FITZGERALD For SCOTUS "

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Citizen Spook:"TREASONGATE: FITZGERALD For SCOTUS "

Postby dbeach » Sat Oct 29, 2005 2:56 pm

Feared by the bad loved by the GOOD<br>CS .DA BEST in da WEST!!<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://citizenspook.blogspot.com/">citizenspook.blogspot.com/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>"TREASONGATE: FITZGERALD For SCOTUS <br>Fitz asked America to trust him yesterday. And he's earned our trust. The country and even the criminals are lucky to have this man at this moment in time. Turns out that Patrick "the bulldog" Fitzgerald is nothing more than a doe eyed fawn caught in the headlights...but they haven't blinded him.<br><br>The headlights of the world are focused right into the eyes a genuine pure soul. How many of that species are left on this filthy planet? Fitz took all the steam out of me. The venom is gone. I'm slightly ashamed of myself after listening to Fitzgerald and digesting his vibrations.<br><br>Make no doubt about it, Citizen Spook would have thrown the book at the Bush crime family (and even the reporters involved) for violating 18 USC 794 of The Espionage Act which has life in prison or the death penalty as the ultimate sentence.<br>18 USC 793 does not require that the leakers intended to hurt the country. This is a talking point I was hearing within minutes of the press conference having ended. On more than one program I heard the right wingnuts like Hannity and even some ill informed guest on Randi Rhodes' show playing the card that the IIPA and the Espionage Act are equally difficult to prosecute because of "the intent requirement". They were alleging that the Espionage Act requires the prosecutor prove that the leaker "intended to harm the country".<br><br><br>This is a lie. Please see the first Citizen Spook report, TREASONGATE: The Controlling Law - Big Trouble For The White House Staff for an in depth study of 18 USC 793. The short version goes like this:<br><br>18 USC 793 of The Espionage Act --<br><br><br>The statute only requires that the information leaked be related to the national defense and that the individual responsible for disclosing that information have a reasonable belief that the information could be used to the detriment of the USA.<br>Fitzgerald is a national treasure.<br><br>18 USC 793 was violated and Fitz is coming after those who are guilty. The talk shows, newspapers and blogs will not change his mind at all. He is more ethical than the rest of us, has no political axe to grind, and is fully capable of handling whatever pressure comes his way.<br><br>Thank you, James Comey. And thank you President Bush for installing Fitz as US Attorney.<br><br>Like Fitzgerald said, "Let's all take a deep breathe." The prosecutor deserves our faith. Let him do his job. <br><br>If you're guilty, plead guilty. It's your best bet and what's best for the country.<br><br>Fitzgerald for SCOTUS. That would be one hell of an ending to this. It's Bush's only chance for a true legacy.<br> <p></p><i></i>
dbeach
 
Posts: 2650
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 7:40 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Citizen Spook:"TREASONGATE: FITZGERALD For SCOTUS &

Postby Fearless » Sat Oct 29, 2005 3:16 pm

CS for SCOTUS! <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
Fearless
 
Posts: 256
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 8:13 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Citizen Spook:"TREASONGATE: FITZGERALD For SCOTUS &

Postby OnoI812 » Sat Oct 29, 2005 4:41 pm

<!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>I heard the right wingnuts like Hannity and even some ill informed guest on Randi Rhodes' show playing the card that the IIPA and the Espionage Act are equally difficult to prosecute because of "the intent requirement". They were alleging that the Espionage Act requires the prosecutor prove that the leaker "intended to harm the country"</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END-->.<br><br>I was listening to that Randi interview yesterday and she was battling with him over that point of contention, and even got him to come off the "intent" argument somewhat toword the end of the interview.<br><br><br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>
OnoI812
 
Posts: 528
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Citizen Spook:"TREASONGATE: FITZGERALD For SCOTUS &

Postby antiaristo » Sat Oct 29, 2005 5:15 pm

The Morison judgement by the Supremes dealy with exactly this point. MOTIVE IS IRRELEVANT. <p></p><i></i>
antiaristo
 
Posts: 2555
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 9:50 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Citizen Spook:"TREASONGATE: FITZGERALD For SCOTUS &

Postby AnnaLivia » Sat Oct 29, 2005 10:25 pm

C Spook, i've searched all day for the words to convey how fine, how full of grace, how moving...was your blog entry today.<br><br>i'm at a loss to express my admiration.<br><br>namaste<br>namaste<br><br>AnnaLivia<br><br>(i would post comments at your page, but i don't have a blog) <p></p><i></i>
AnnaLivia
 
Posts: 747
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 3:44 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to Plame Investigation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests