Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
Who said anything about agencies?
sunny wrote:hava, it's so nice to see you posting here again.
Recently, here in Israel. The parking section of the Jerusalem Municipality has fallen in the hands of org crime. Which means, that with local contacts to law enforcement they are making up "Zombie" debts (as in parking tickets without proof) and hack one's bank accounts, attach car, raid houses etc. I've had this happen to me, and through the process I received emails from "friends of judges" who complain that this method has been used to 'chill" them, namely, threaten them. So, you have a local group with very good connections to LOCAL law enforcement that can exert huge power, even nationally (cause collecting debts is not limited to residents of Jerusalem). One person I know, one morning gets up to find ALL his bank accounts frozen, his car attached, like his hands are tied. Now, if you happen to be doing something relevant for this group, you "get the message". Because, it took me at least 3 months to free my bank account again (after I used local press, local politician opposition group, etc.). During the process you get "clues" what they want, and who is behind that. I can tell you this did not make me want to drown myself, but I was VERY depressed and concerned. Other people I know, had Asthma attacks and what not. One feels very helpless.
FBI informant who stung RNC 2008 anarchists connected to ‘firebomb plot’ on Brave New Books and “suicided” Palestinian activist Riad Hamad
Is Austin-area FBI Informant Brandon Darby, who allegedly provoked anarchists into plotting with ‘molotov cocktails’ at the RNC 2008 connected to plans to “firebomb” patriot bookstore Brave New Books and a sting on “suicided” Palestinian activist Riad Hamad?
Aaron Dykes
Infowars
December 8, 2009
Flyers circulated across Austin coffeehouses reading “Wanted: Brandon Darby An Informant Rat Loose in Austin.”
AUSTIN, TEXAS — Remember Riad Hamad, the Palestinian man who’s “suicide” left him at the bottom of Lady Bird Lake in Austin with his mouth gagged and arms duct-taped behind his back? (Kurt Nimmo, Did Palestinian Activist Riad Hamad Commit Suicide? )
According to reports, he was observed at meetings with now-outed FBI informant/provocateur Brandon Darby, who admittedly set up two anarchist/leftists from Austin with “molotov cocktails” who were subsequently arrested for alleged plans to attack police cars outside the RNC 2008 in Minnesota in connection with the “RNC Welcoming Committee.”
Since Darby’s exposure as an admitted FBI informant, flyers have been seen in coffeehouses across Austin reading “Wanted: Brandon Darby An Informant Rat Loose in Austin.”
WHAT’S MORE– Scott Crow, anarchist/leftist who formed the Hurricane Katrina relief group “Common Ground Collective” has made a number of interesting connections with fellow member Brandon Darby, whose role in Common Ground may have coincided with his FBI/Police Informant role, which may have begun in 2004, 2005 or 2006.
Scott Crow claims that in 2006, after Brandon Darby was admittedly an FBI informant, Darby attempted to recruit Crow on a plot to “firebomb” Brave New Books of Austin, Texas. Crow writes:In Darby’s ‘revolutionary rhetoric’ over the years he tried to get numerous people, including myself, to do the things the two men were eventually taken down for. I believe now he tried to set me up in 2006 (after he, according to FBI documents began informing and provoking) to firebomb a bookstore called Brave New Books in Austin. I was NOT interested at all and thought it was stupid. I tried to talk him out of it. The event never happened. He was allowed to change his mind and move on. What if the Feds had raided him at the time?
This astonishing information was brought to my attention by Harlan of Brave New Books, but the connection to Riad Hamad I found only afterwards in Crow’s posts. Harlan writes:The vitriol that seems to chase Darby to this day is due to the fact that two young activists David McKay and Bradley Crowder have been sentenced to a combined six years in prison for possessing several Molotov cocktails that were to be used during demonstrations at the 2008 Republican National Convention and were convicted in large part through the testimony of Brandon Darby. The possession of the cocktails is not in question, but what seems peculiar is why Darby an older, seasoned activist would agree to take part in a plan to firebomb a flock of police cars at the RNC, according to the FBI, and not just persuade the younger protégés to avoid instigating violent action? According to the defendants, Darby had encouraged the violence and had provoked the younger activists to take this direction, an allegation Darby denies. Darby admits that he was asked by the bureau to be the “eyes and ears” to monitor the small, loose-knit group of activists that included McKay.
Scott Crow (left) with Brandon Darby (right)
Crow initially defended Darby against allegations that he was reporting to the FBI , warning against ‘divisive rumors’ and COINTELPRO, even after claims had spread that he was an FBI informant. After Darby publicly admitted his role as an informant, Crow expressed regret for his support in a post titled “Eating Crow”, and then later expressed several suggestive claims about the extent of Brandon Darby’s political provocateuring in the Austin political scene, as posted on the PM Press.
Darby has appeared on ‘This American Life’/ NPR and in papers like the Austin Chronicle to talk about his background as an activist and his account of how he became an FBI informant through a New Orleans cop– once opposed to his groups’ actions until he was swayed by community relief efforts he witnessed in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. Or so the story goes…
Crow claims that Darby began contacting the FBI earlier, however, when he traveled to New Orleans in 2004 (prior to Hurricane Katrina) to “see what [the FBI] had on him” in their files. Clearly, in light of certain revelations, this may demonstrate a much longer-lasting relationship inside the FBI.
Brandon Darby has some wild claims, as stated in ‘This American Life,’ that he traveled to Venezuela to convince Chavez to fund their Hurricane Katrina relief effort. While there, he says he was referred to a meeting with the FARC rebels who tried to recruit him to start a revolutionary group ‘in the swamps of Louisiana.’ Darby says he turned them down.
FBI Informant Brandon Darby claims he went undercover to stop Riad Hamad from ‘recruiting people for ‘terroristic’ like activities. Could Darby have been really entrapping Hamad? Why was Hamad found dead, gagged and duct-taped at the bottom of a lake?
Shortly afterwards, while back in Austin, he admits to having reported to the FBI what he claims was a Palestinian man trying to recruit him for a bombing. This may have been connected to Riad Hamad. Crow mentions the NPR story’s account of the interaction with Riad Hamad:In the ['This American Life']/NPR story, they mention Darby going undercover to stop a Palestinian peace activist named Riad Hammad [sic] from recruiting people for potentially ‘terroristic’ like activities. They don’t mention that Riad was found dead at the bottom of a river here in Austin under very unusual circumstances which the Feds ruled a suicide, but looked like was done to him. And that there is NO public evidence that anything that Darby is saying is true. I don’t know myself, but Riad cannot defend himself against the accusations.
Scott Crow claims that Brandon Darby introduced him to Riad Hamad and other Palestinians at Green Muse Cafe coffee shop in Austin, telling him that “these were real revolutionaries” and not just “anarchists.”
This inciting rhetoric, which Crow believes was another attempt to provocateur him into revolutionary action/violence was very similar to supposed accounts of Darby’s goading the “Texas 2″ prior to the RNC 2008 that they were ‘weakling vegetarians’ and ‘couldn’t handle potentially violent revolutionary acts at the RNC.’ McKay claims Darby further goaded them to find out if they would take ‘revolutionary’ action or not once the RNC was underway. When he apparently agreed, and stated an apparently unplanned assault on a line of police cars, it led to the bust. Crow writes:They also don’t mention that when I went to meet Darby at the Green Mews [sic] coffee shop in Austin during this time he was often with Riad and some men he described in excited tones as ‘real revolutionaries’ not activists. He could not wait to tell me, as if I would be impressed. I told him, as always that he needed to watch out for people he didn’t know, but what I didn’t know was working for the Feds. Silly me. So he is bragging about this in a public place, did he entrap Riad for the Feds like Brad and David? I have know idea, but I know that Riad is dead either because he took his own life because he thought someone was after him, or someone else took his life, because they figured there was an informer in their midst. Either of those scenarios are completely sad and scary, and not the world I want to create or be a part of.
Crow points out that Darby’s accounts of when he first contacted the FBI do not add up:On at least THREE different and unrelated times Darby has stated that it was the FIRST time or reason he contact the FBI. The first was in 2004 when he, according to what he told me and my partner, went to visit the New Orleans office of the FBI to see what they had on him. It sounded SOOOO paranoid. He explained the story in great detail about his visit. The second time was in recent interviews where he has stated he saw that Brad and David were going to do something ‘harmful’ at the RNC in Minneapolis and he had to intervene. And now he is saying that he had to visit the Feds when he saw that Riad Hammad [sic], his friend, was not in fact a school teacher in Austin, but was involved in some other ‘nefarious’ activities. So which is the truth? I know he met commander Bryson of NOPD in Oct/ or Nov. of 2005. He has stated in interviews that Bryson is the one who introduced him to the Feds. Did he begin his work to spy on Common Ground and all of us then? Where is the real Darby?
Crow says that while he knew Brandon Darby for more than six years inside the Austin activist community, his actions were consistently violence-oriented, and with grandstanding, in opposition to the views held by most of the other anarchist members.For years he advocated ‘blowing things up’ and later using arson. I don’t know if he did, but he sure did try to get other to do it. So was it revolutionary zeal or agent provocateur sh*t straight out of the manual?
Crow states that Darby seemed to merely adopt the rhetoric of various activist groups while differing from their common behaviors (most of the activists were vegan, yet he ate meat; was in favor of dictation over consensus, and ’slept with a lot of women’ and acted in a macho or chauvinistic manner). Crow wrote:Darby was NOT an anarchist. He actually never claimed to be for the longest time. He disagreed with horizontal organizing and many of the underpinnings of anarchism. He DID however absorb the language, when necessary for interviews or speaking in public. He NEVER absorbed the practice during the 6 years I have known him. He actually was more of a quasi ‘central-democratic’ Marxist. He thought anarchist wasted time, energy and resources. Myself and few excluded of course . He would blurt in the same breath. He aligned himself with what he thought the Black Panther Party central committee would do–whether it was true or not. He didn’t have a liberation or even an anti-oppression analysis, but enough information to get by within radical circles.
He was the only ”’anarchist”’ I have ever known that wanted to ‘overthrow the government’. I debated and argued with him about the impossibilities and reasons why that was a bad idea on so many levels, but he took that message many places to the chagrin and dismay of many radical circles.
Further information is found on the Rag Blog (more)
Harlan at Brave New Books writes:Why was Darby choosing a bookstore as a target for a direct action? Was his plan a way to ensnare fellow activists in a plot that would eventually be foiled by the heroic FBI? Or was this plan another classic government provocateur attempting to firebomb an actual threat to the FBI and the state, wielding his useful idiots as his accomplices all the while knowing he would be provided the full protection of the FBI? The latter seems justifiably more accurate given the history of the FBI and its long train of abuses using agent provocateurs to carry out its dirty work. One need not look any further than the FBI’s clear infiltration of Elohim City using Timothy McVeigh as their asset. One could also look at the semi-retarded young religious men in Florida that were drafted by the U.S. government through the work of a joint terrorism task force agent who had infiltrated their group and persuaded them to express that they would be willing to help the terrorism task force blow up the Sears Tower in Chicago. Also, one should never forget that the FBI helped train an informant and provided materials to the informant that were used in the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. The bombing was allowed to occur with full knowledge of its planning by the FBI. There are loads of other examples that support the notion that the FBI routinely uses agent provocateurs in an effort to undermine its political enemies and swell its rank and budget.
In regrards to Brandon Darby, it is interesting to note that he was committed to seeing the Molotov cocktail bombing through at the RNC. According to the radio show This American Life, that featured Darby and people who knew him, Darby was willing to go ahead with the plan to bomb the police cars with David McKay in the early morning hours but the younger McKay never materialized and the plot was called off. This doesn’t describe the behavior of an innocent observer and sounds more like the actions of an active participant willing to commit an act of terrorism and then scapegoat a pair of useful idiots. So would Darby’s same zeal for terrorism had occurred if there would have been someone that would have been willing to help in Darby’s plan to attack the bookstore? Luckily, we will never know because he was never able to execute his plans
http://www.infowars.com/fbi-informant-w ... iad-hamad/
Will the real story please stand up? Darby, democracy and self
Hello comrades, friends and allies
After listening to the pieces on 'This American Life' about Brandon Darby in which parts of my life have been overturned. I had some thoughts.History and participating in it is odd. Perceptions, truths and half truths swirl in a muck to produce 'the story'. There is always so much more to say.
This story, the story of informants, activists and motvies, is complicated, as are all of our lives. It is hard to get the whole picture from all the voices, concerns and viewpoints, especially when one of those voices--the government is holding their cards close and withholding information. It will take years to sort it all out.
I don't want to give it much more brain space, but want to clarify clearly a couple of things and ask some public questions, so please bear with me for a moment.
1. Darby DID NOT co-found Common Ground. He and I went in a boat to get our friend Robert King of the Angola 3 who we believed was trapped in New Orleans. After that mission, Darby left New Orleans for SIX WEEKS. Malik , Sharon and I co-founded the organization based on our expericences and a plan I had drawn up on the first trip, which Malik agree to. Darby was NOT an organizer and had NEVER organized ANYTHING in his life. He had attended a few demonstrations. Period. He wanted nothing to do with the idea when I proposed it. Malik, out of a sense of loyalty to us in what we did defending against the white militia, always bestowed it on him.
He didn't have the socio-political analysis to see the power vacuum the failing governments had created by their negligence and indifference to historically marginalized people. He saw and action adventure mission and charity, and once it was done, so was he until the organization grew.
The organization was well established in Algiers, Houma, and along the coast as well as had been making excursions for relief into the wards from the get go. We had already been working in the 9th, Lower 9th and 7th wards, albeit on much more clandestine and smaller scale when he returned. On the recent Democracy Now(Jan 09') story on this case, Malik gave him credit again, but regretted the statement and wanted to withdraw it afterward, but it was live and recorded.
It also begs the larger question what does co-founder mean? Besides 'street cred'. There were many wonderful, imaginative and hard working people who coordinated and organized many projects at Common Ground. What about those people, especially the early ones who built the first programs within days and weeks?
Darby was brought in as the interim director for almost three months, but under great internal politicking by him and causing duress from coordinators on the ground at the time. When he left the organization was in non-functioning on many levels. But that is a longer story for later.
2. Darby was NOT an anarchist. He actually never claimed to be for the longest time. He disagreed with horizontal organizing and many of the underpinnings of anarchism. He DID however absorb the language, when necessary for interviews or speaking in public. He NEVER absorbed the practice during the 6 years I have known him. He actually was more of a quasi 'central-democratic' Marxist. He thought anarchist wasted time, energy and resources. Myself and few excluded of course . He would blurt in the same breath. He aligned himself with what he thought the Black Panther Party central committee would do--whether it was true or not. He didn't have a liberation or even an anti-oppression analysis, but enough information to get by
within radical circles.
He is a self described 'former christian fundamentalist' which might explain is 'all or nothing', binary 'beliefs'.
He was the only '''anarchist''' I have ever known that wanted to 'overthrow the government'. I debated and argued with him about the impossibilities and reasons why that was a bad idea on so many levels, but he took that message many places to the chagrin and dismay of many radical circles.
3. On at least THREE different and unrelated times Darby has stated that it was the FIRST time or reason he contact the FBI. The first was in 2004 when he, according to what he told me and my partner, went to visit the New Orleans office of the FBI to see what they had on him. It sounded SOOOO paranoid. He explained the story in great detail about his visit. The second time was in recent interviews where he has stated he saw that Brad and David were going to do something 'harmful' at the RNC in Minneapolis and he had to intervene. And now he is saying that he had to visit the Feds when he saw that Riad Hammad , his friend, was not in fact a school teacher in Austin, but was involved in some other 'nefarious' activities. So which is the truth? I know he met commander Bryson of NOPD in Oct/ or Nov. of 2005. He has stated in interviews that Bryson is the one who introduced him to the Feds. Did he begin his work to spy on Common Ground and all of us then? Where is the real Darby?
4. In the 'T.A.L.'/NPR story, they mention Darby going undercover to stop a Palestinian peace activist named Riad Hammad from recruiting people for potentially 'terroristic' like activities. They don't mention that Riad was found dead at the bottom of a river here in Austin under very unusual circumstances which the Feds ruled a suicide, but looked like was done to him. (See: http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase ... rID=621848) And that there is NO public evidence that anything that Darby is saying is true. I don't know myself, but Riad cannot defend himself against the accusations.
They also don't mention that when I went to meet Darby at the Green Mews coffee shop in Austin during this time he was often with Riad and some men he described in excited tones as 'real revolutionaries' not activists. He could not wait to tell me, as if I would be impressed. I told him , as always that he needed to watch out for people he didn't know, but what I didn't know was working for the Feds. Silly me. So he is bragging about this in a public place, did he entrap Riad for the Feds like Brad and David? I have know idea, but I know that Riad is dead either because he took his own life because he thought someone was after him, or someone else took his life, because they figured there was an informer in their midst. Either of those scenarios are completely sad and scary, and not the world I want to create or be a part of.
5. In Darby's 'revolutionary rhetoric' over the years he tried to get numerous people, including myself, to do the things the two men were eventually taken down for. I believe now he tried to set me up in 2006 (after he, according to FBI documents began informing and provoking) to firebomb a bookstore called Brave New Books in Austin. I was NOT interested at all and thought it was stupid. I tried to talk him out of it. The event never happened. He was allowed to change his mind and move on. What if the Feds had raided him at the time?
It was the kind of action mixed with his confused politics that was a pattern with him. I was going to testify to this in David McKay's second trial. For years he advocated 'blowing things up' and later using arson. I don't know if he did, but he sure did try to get other to do it. So was it revolutionary zeal or agent provocateur shit straight out of the manual?
That is all I have to share now. Thanks for taking the time to let me clear the air on this rainy day. Two men are now in prison for a thought crime, one man is dead in Austin and according to the bad governments documents from the McKay trail he is still on the payroll working on other cases.
This is not democracy, this is a farce with real consequences and real impacts on so many lives. The pollution and fear mongering of the statehas gone unchecked of years, and now a new generation of men and women are in prison.
I still do not fear the government, but recognized the dangerous and ludicrous levels they will go to to justify bureaucracy, and budgets and departments and 'security'. When did we it become ok for anyone to turn in people for money and talk to the media like it was a sporting match between two teams? (Scratching of head...)
More of this will be revealed as the future becomes the present.
Do not be afraid, do not stop trusting, and do not stop dreaming of better worlds.
Still humbly dreaming of collective liberation.
http://www.pmpress.org/content/article. ... 4183202965
FBI Informant Plotted to Firebomb Brave New Books
by Harlan D.
At one time, Austinite Brandon Darby was regarded as a legendary activist, a revolutionary, working as an active community organizer for the Common Ground Relief organization in the post-Katrina New Orleans. Nowadays, Darby is considered by many activists to be a turncoat, a traitor to the cause, probably due to the fact that Darby decided to be an informant for the FBI. Flyers have been seen in coffeehouses across Austin reading “Wanted: Brandon Darby An Informant Rat Loose in Austin.” The vitriol that seems to chase Darby to this day is due to the fact that two young activists David McKay and Bradley Crowder have been sentenced to a combined six years in prison for possessing several Molotov cocktails that were to be used during demonstrations at the 2008 Republican National Convention and were convicted in large part through the testimony of Brandon Darby. The possession of the cocktails is not in question, but what seems peculiar is why Darby an older, seasoned activist would agree to take part in a plan to firebomb a flock of police cars at the RNC, according to the FBI, and not just persuade the younger protégés to avoid instigating violent action? According to the defendants, Darby had encouraged the violence and had provoked the younger activists to take this direction, an allegation Darby denies. Darby admits that he was asked by the bureau to be the “eyes and ears" to monitor the small, loose-knit group of activists that included McKay. Jeffrey DeGree, the defense attorney for Mckay is quoted as saying it was more accurate that "he wasn't the eyes and ears. He was the mouth — a violent, firebomb-obsessed mouth."
More recently, one of Darby’s closest friends, Scott Crow, a fellow anarchist activist and member of Common Ground, confessed that Brandon Darby had a long history of trying to recruit activists for what the two men were eventually convicted of. Crow’s admission, that in 2006 Brandon tried to recruit Crow and others “to firebomb a bookstore in Austin called Brave New Books,” was discovered on the Internet site PMPress.org. This plan was hatched at a time when Darby was already in the employ of the Feds according to FBI documents. Crow says, “that for years he [Darby] advocated ‘blowing things up’ and later using arson.” Scott was unsure that Darby had ever committed any acts of terrorism but according to him, Brandon was intent “on getting others to do it.” So according to Scott Crow’s testimony, a known FBI informant with a history for provoking violent action had his sights set on Brave New Books. Scott Crow was so adamant about Darby’s plan to bomb Brave New Books that he was willing to testify under oath in David McKay’s second trial to show that Darby had a history for initiating terrorist actions which would have given the defense the precedent needed to prove that Darby was in fact the instigator and not the innocent spectator he claimed he was. It also speaks to the fact that Scott Crow was very likely telling the truth about the plot to firebomb the bookstore, due to his willingness to testify under oath.
Why was Darby choosing a bookstore as a target for a direct action? Was his plan a way to ensnare fellow activists in a plot that would eventually be foiled by the heroic FBI? Or was this plan another classic government provocateur attempting to firebomb an actual threat to the FBI and the state, wielding his useful idiots as his accomplices all the while knowing he would be provided the full protection of the FBI? The latter seems justifiably more accurate given the history of the FBI and its long train of abuses using agent provocateurs to carry out its dirty work. One need not look any further than the FBI’s clear infiltration of Elohim City using Timothy McVeigh as their asset. One could also look at the semi-retarded young religious men in Florida that were drafted by the U.S. government through the work of a joint terrorism task force agent who had infiltrated their group and persuaded them to express that they would be willing to help the terrorism task force blow up the Sears Tower in Chicago. Also, one should never forget that the FBI helped train an informant and provided materials to the informant that were used in the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. The bombing was allowed to occur with full knowledge of its planning by the FBI. There are loads of other examples that support the notion that the FBI routinely uses agent provocateurs in an effort to undermine its political enemies and swell its rank and budget.
In regrards to Brandon Darby, it is interesting to note that he was committed to seeing the Molotov cocktail bombing through at the RNC. According to the radio show This American Life, that featured Darby and people who knew him, Darby was willing to go ahead with the plan to bomb the police cars with David McKay in the early morning hours but the younger McKay never materialized and the plot was called off. This doesn't describe the behavior of an innocent observer and sounds more like the actions of an active participant willing to commit an act of terrorism and then scapegoat a pair of useful idiots. So would Darby's same zeal for terrorism had occurred if there would have been someone that would have been willing to help in Darby's plan to attack the bookstore? Luckily, we will never know because he was never able to execute his plans.
So with a review of the bureau’s history still fresh in one’s mind, considering Brandon Darby’s wavering personality in the mind of the public between the heroic Dudley Do-Right and nefarious government spook we see that Brandon Darby fits neatly into the second camp as a classic model for a government provocateur. So why did this FBI employee allegedly target Brave New Books for bombing? Is it possible that the bookstore was targeted because Brave New Books represents a genuine populist revolution, based on individual liberties and freedom of information? Or was it targeted because it threatens the state monopoly on violence and the fake opposition’s monopoly on dissent? This author for one thinks so.
This article was published on Monday 07 December, 2009.
http://www.bravenewbookstore.com/articl ... icles_id=5
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 157 guests