Pay no mind to the Mossad agent on the line

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Postby GM Citizen » Tue Jun 17, 2008 5:15 pm

unaltered wrote:
GM Citizen wrote:
unaltered wrote: a fairy tale. 19 middle eastern hijackers form Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Lebanon and some want to deny they even existed-puhleeze.


I don't recall any mention of the 19 alleged hijackers not existing. Quite the opposite, I have read that some exist to this day. And that some had doubles, or at the very least, visibly identifying themselves as if to lay down a legend for future use.


All disproven.


How so?
Veni, Vidi, Velcro - I came, I saw, I stuck around
GM Citizen
 
Posts: 254
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:02 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby 8bitagent » Tue Jun 17, 2008 5:18 pm

Jeff wrote:
unaltered wrote:Yes, normally an FBI spokesman unnamed would be unreliable but you seem to have missed the artcle I posted from the Herald which second sources her denial.


Do you realize this is Keller's second retraction? She admitted to her relationship with Atta after the attacks, but retracted her story under what she told Hopsicker was intimidation by the FBI.

From Welcome to Terrorland:

Amanda Keller said she's suffered the same bullying harassment from the FBI that the other intimidated witnesses at the Sandpiper Apartments were forced to endure. Even after she left Venice, she said, FBI agents called her every other day for several months after the attack, just as they had with Stephanie Frederickson. "There was a police car constantly watching the house," she said.

"When we burned some leaves in a burn barrel, a police officer came over and told us we weren't allowed to burn anything because we were on some FBI list, and they were afraid we might be burning documents or something."

Pretty serious surveillance for a girl who lived with some other Mohamed... Was this why she recanted her original statement?

"Because of the intimidation by the FBI," she replied. "They told me not to talk to anybody, to keep my mouth shut. The newspaper quote was accurate: 'I can't say anything because I'm afraid I'll get in trouble."

The FBI nearly convinced her that she didn't know who she'd been living with for two months, Amanda said. It was easier to go along with what she was being told.


The Atta that emerges from Keller's account is completely compatible with the one who turned up at Shuckums in Ft Lauderdale on Sept 8 with Marwan Al-Shehhi. Bartender Patricia Idrissi said "Atta drank Stoli vodka for three straight hours. The guy was drunk. They were wasted." She said he'd pulled out a thick roll and said "You think I can't pay? I'm a pilot for American Airlines. I can pay my fucking bill." He doesn't match the one in the 9/11 Report, which is why he's been disappeared.


the SAME bullshit by government spooks drove this woman mad:

http://www.mainetoday.com/9-11/2003/030 ... ow_results

Image

Meet Laura Wale, the then manager of the Comfort Inn in Portland Maine.

On September 10th, Atta and that punk young kid al-Omari were said to have gotten some shut eye here, before inexplicably taking a puddle jumper and barely missing their Logan flight...where OKC bomber al Husseini Hussein was the baggage handler and Atta's luggage mysteriously didnt make it on the plane

Now, even honest investigators are puzzled why Atta was in Portland maine
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14686192/

Meeting his handlers, of course. Last minute instructions

Laura has been driven near mad

[img] Many people learned to cope after crossing paths with the terrorists at flight schools, universities and stores. But Wale's mental health deteriorated. Her behavior became so erratic that she eventually checked into a psychiatric unit during a visit to the Washington, D.C., area last fall.

"I mean, it's been a loss of a lifetime," Wale said, smoking a cigarette as she sat on a Portland park bench on a recent afternoon. "My life up until now is over as I know it."[/img]

But she wonders

How did government agents know to storm the Comfort Inn only hours after the Twin Towers fell? Why did the FBI release surveillance video of Atta and Alomari at various locations in South Portland, but not the lobby of the Comfort Inn?

What, she wonders, is on that tape?


she also said

Wale spent the next 48 hours at the hotel, bringing in crisis counselors for her staff, signing evidence forms, retrieving the surveillance video, running names, making faxes - whatever the FBI wanted.

"The Dumpster needed to be moved," she said. "The picture of (Atta's) shirt on the FBI Web site? They pulled that out of our Dumpster at the Comfort Inn."


Why the break down?

That's when Wale suffered a nervous breakdown and checked herself into Potomac Ridge Behavioral Health Adventist Healthcare in Rockville, Md., on Nov. 11, said Ralph Tucker, her workers' compensation lawyer and former head of the state Workers' Compensation Commis- sion.

Wale had been stopped for speeding, according to Tucker and hospital reports, and told police that she had been trying to get away from government agents.


Why are agents so keen on harassing witnesses?

Why were agents at Huffman aviation within hours of 9/11, as one employee put it "they knew all along".

This is the dark side of 9/11 that most truthers and virtually all debunkers care little about, as it shatters their little paradigm.
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12244
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby GM Citizen » Tue Jun 17, 2008 5:22 pm

8bitagent wrote:As far as arguing with Alice, she's already made up her mind that no middle Easterner or Muslim could ever possibly be involved in something like 9/11...it had to have been all Israel, with Bush in a supporting role.


What I get from reading Alice's postings is that she does not say that there were no Middle Eastern or Muslim folks involved with 9/11, but rather that if there were any, they were so far down the food chain as to be virtually insignificant, possibly patsies or manufactured legends. Certainly they would be at the opposite end of the spectrum from the zionists, neo-cons, oil folks, etc.
Veni, Vidi, Velcro - I came, I saw, I stuck around
GM Citizen
 
Posts: 254
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:02 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Hopsicker pimping Atta

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Tue Jun 17, 2008 5:28 pm

Alex Constantine condemns Hopsicker as being an Operation Mockingbird fake steering us into the '19 Ay-rabs' cover story of 9/11.

Trying to find AC's articles on this....Here's one from 2007 on how PTech could be a diversion into 'al-Queda dunnit' just like 'Atta dunnit'-

http://aconstantineblacklist.blogspot.com/2007/08/whats-wrong-with-ptech-conspiracy.html

What's Wrong with Indira Singh, et al.?

By Alex Constantine

There is a simple but effective Himmlerian approach to propaganda employed widely since 9/11 that combines the limited hang-out with a tactical lie, a clever sleight of hand: the eye is fixed on the hang-out, so the lie passes without comment. The Birch Society - a hot bed of cold war intrigues - plied the technique, accusing the Eisenhower administration of numerous conspiratorial atrocites - many of them committed in fact by Birch nazis in the military-industrial sector - going so far as to denounce him as a "communist agent."

Daniel Hopsicker, for example, melds CIA scandal with Mohammed Atta's antics to reinforce the notion that the Bin Laden organization was behind 9/11. The formula that places the CIA and Atta - or "the mastermind of 9/11," per Hopsicker, an echo of Bush's shallow rhetoric - in league supports the administration's charge that storm clouds of Islamo-Fascism hailed death and devastation on Manhattan. And that's the purpose of Daniel "NBC" Hopsicker's reporting, to reinforce the programming and give the cover story some artificial limbs to stand on.

The famed Ptech story embodies the same brainwash formula. The CIA and a Boston software firm are lumped with Qaeda to build on the programmed belief that Bin Laden was behind 9/11.

Yes, there does seem to be a scandal stewing, and it implicates Cheney and insidious others - it will go nowhere, like Hopsicker's CIA-drug scams - but the story hooks conspiracists and provides nourishment to the belief that a muslim "flying circus" took down the Trade Center, not the Bush regime. Much is assumed - and this "scandal," too, reinforces the cover story - in the role of Ptech.

It can't, won't, will not be confirmed, but this conspiracy theory lingers to sidetrack and scapegoat.

The Bush administration orchestrated 9/11.

Any theory that says otherwise promotes the intelligence community's propaganda initiative, even those implicating spooks. Hopsicker and Indira Singh - formerly of Morgan banking interests and DARPA - are not investigative reporters ... they are Birch-style propagandists who promote tripe to shift responsibility to designated scapegoats, eg. the Saudis (who scapegoat the U.S. in return to take the heat off the sand Royals).

Hopsicker, of course, lauds Ms. Singh to shore up her baseless credibility: "Last week, when the National 9/11 Commission held hearings on The Aviation Security System and the 9/11 Attack, government and aviation officials described a system unprepared for the events that unfolded on September 11. None of them, however, mentioned security breaches involving 'Saudi terrorists in the basement of the FAA.' Yet that's what happened, according to a high-level risk analyst who had troubling dealings with the firm. 'Ptech had a couple of very troubling client relationships,' states risk architect and whistleblower Indira Singh, 'one of which was with the FAA. One of the 'persons of interest' in the investigation had a team in the basement of the FAA for two years. P-tech worked on a project that revealed all information processes and issues that the FAA had with the National Airspace Systems Agency, NAS,' Singh said. 'The project included incident investigation, law enforcement, military aviation systems, highly sensitive information, especially if you wanted to exploit the FAA’s current capabilities and holes… to jam or slow down U.S. military response to a domestic hijacking, for example.' Just the portion of the story above the waterline and already public record is shocking enough: Briefly, Saudi 'money man' Yasin al-Qadi, named by the Bush Administration as a financial backer of the al-Qaeda terrorist network, had funded a software start-up in Boston named Ptech, reported the Boston Globe over a year ago.... " (Source: http://www.madcowprod.com/mc4522004.html)

Chilling scandal ... the adrenals secrete and the hairs stand on the back of the neck ... a blogger (the name is not important) falls for it:

"Ptech

"Remember Ptech? That's the Boston software firm financed by Saudi businessman Yassin Al-Qadi, who also happens to be an al Qaeda bagman, whose clients happened to include numerous sensitive US federal branches and agencies, including the FAA, the FBI, the military and the White House.

"A little background, from the mainstream, even, thanks to WBZ-TV:

"Joe Bergantino, a reporter for WBZ-TV's investigative team, was torn. He could risk breaking a story based on months of work investigating a software firm linked to terrorism, or heed the government's demand to hold the story for national security reasons. In mid-June, Bergantino received a tip from a woman in New York who suspected that Ptech, a computer software company in Quincy, Mass., had ties to terrorists. Ptech specialized in developing software that manages information contained in computer networks.

"Bergantino's investigation revealed that Ptech's clients included many federal governmental agencies, including the U.S. Army, the U.S. Air Force, the U.S. Naval Air Command, Congress, the Department of Energy, the Federal Aviation Administration, the Internal Revenue Service, NATO, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Secret Service and even the White House.

"Ptech was doing business with every federal government in defense and had access to key government data," Bergantino said. ...

"Bergatino's tipster was Indira Singh, who has said she recognizes the separate command and control communications system Mike Ruppert describes Dick Cheney to have been running on September 11th as having "the exact same functionality I was looking to utilize [for] Ptech. ... "
••••••••••••••••
Blogger "bin'dare" responds:

Ptech may well have been a CIA asset but it certainly was not an example of "Al-Qaeda terrorist" infiltrating american government. Yet that is what Indira Singh claimed initially and in the process destroyed a rather promising company. Why? Was it because it was founded and run by a muslim with a number of muslim workers? That is certainly what gave the accusation traction.

Now she claims Ptech's software is the type that Ruppert says Cheney used on 9/11. How did she recognize it?

She says: "I was looking to set up a shadow surveillance system on everything going on, every transaction and the ability to backdoor, to look at information unobtrusively and to backdoor intelligent agents out there to do things that other people would not be aware of."

She is either lying, and if not, what the fuck is a consultant for a bank doing creating backdoor intelligent agents (i'm assuming these are software agents, not the physical thing)?

She stinks to high hell.

In response to the following headline, she said "I am sure the families of the victims of 9/11 will be glad to hear that."

Rumored links to terrorism doomed business: But owner of former Quincy company has no hard feelings

QUINCY - The Marina Bay software company raided by federal agents in late 2002 has become a ‘‘virtual company'' with no offices or staff.

Publicity about a Customs Service raid on Ptech's headquarters made it impossible for the 10-year-old company to attract new clients, CEO Oussama Ziade said yesterday.

So it laid off the last of its 50-person work force in October, shuttered its office, and now markets its technology through a third party
(more)

http://ledger.southofboston.com/article ... news04.txt
CIA runs mainstream media since WWII:
news rooms, movies/TV, publishing
...
Disney is CIA for kidz!
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby unaltered » Tue Jun 17, 2008 5:34 pm

Jeff wrote:
unaltered wrote:Yes, normally an FBI spokesman unnamed would be unreliable but you seem to have missed the artcle I posted from the Herald which second sources her denial.


Do you realize this is Keller's second retraction? She admitted to her relationship with Atta after the attacks, but retracted her story under what she told Hopsicker was intimidation by the FBI.

From Welcome to Terrorland:

Amanda Keller said she's suffered the same bullying harassment from the FBI that the other intimidated witnesses at the Sandpiper Apartments were forced to endure. Even after she left Venice, she said, FBI agents called her every other day for several months after the attack, just as they had with Stephanie Frederickson. "There was a police car constantly watching the house," she said.

"When we burned some leaves in a burn barrel, a police officer came over and told us we weren't allowed to burn anything because we were on some FBI list, and they were afraid we might be burning documents or something."

Pretty serious surveillance for a girl who lived with some other Mohamed... Was this why she recanted her original statement?

"Because of the intimidation by the FBI," she replied. "They told me not to talk to anybody, to keep my mouth shut. The newspaper quote was accurate: 'I can't say anything because I'm afraid I'll get in trouble."

The FBI nearly convinced her that she didn't know who she'd been living with for two months, Amanda said. It was easier to go along with what she was being told.


The Atta that emerges from Keller's account is completely compatible with the one who turned up at Shuckums in Ft Lauderdale on Sept 8 with Marwan Al-Shehhi. Bartender Patricia Idrissi said "Atta drank Stoli vodka for three straight hours. The guy was drunk. They were wasted." She said he'd pulled out a thick roll and said "You think I can't pay? I'm a pilot for American Airlines. I can pay my fucking bill." He doesn't match the one in the 9/11 Report, which is why he's been disappeared.


Keller and Hopsicker's "witnessess," are all over the place especially over time. This doesn't inspire much confidence for me. Sorry.
unaltered
 
Posts: 345
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 9:55 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby 8bitagent » Tue Jun 17, 2008 5:36 pm

Alex Constantine is full of shit on that one.

I don't believe for a SECOND that Osama or KSM or any "Muslim" or al Qaeda man masterminded dick squat in regards to 9/11 or any of the other plots.

NOR do I find it credible that "Israel" or "the Bush administration" masterminded 9/11. More disinfo.

Hell, Bill Clinton's administration has just as deep or more complicity than the Bush administration...they're all globalist pawns.

How come truthers never examine the Bill Clinton era, only the day of 9/11 itself or the few months leading to it? AS IF 9/11 just began in January 2001.
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12244
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby unaltered » Tue Jun 17, 2008 5:42 pm

8bitagent wrote:


Let me guess, another debunker site? .


LOL......well who else is going to do anything but ignore or agree with these thin accusations? The trick is to look at the claim and see if you can specifically disprove it without resorting to the endgame right away-----you know, it's all being orchestrated by------fill in the blank.
unaltered
 
Posts: 345
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 9:55 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby sunny » Tue Jun 17, 2008 5:44 pm

8bit, if you keep eliminating factions from the plot we'll be left with lizard people.
Choose love
sunny
 
Posts: 5220
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Alabama
Blog: View Blog (1)

Postby nathan28 » Tue Jun 17, 2008 6:02 pm

8bitagent wrote:Hell, Bill Clinton's administration has just as deep or more complicity than the Bush administration...they're all globalist pawns.

How come truthers never examine the Bill Clinton era, only the day of 9/11 itself or the few months leading to it? AS IF 9/11 just began in January 2001.


They don't examine the Clinton era because Mena, AK and Iran-Contra are "conspiracy theory" to most people. I'm not sure I buy the "globalist plot" story. Blaming "globalists" only sounds a little bit like blaming the Elders of Zion--a shadowy group that no one can really ever pin down because it doesn't exist. Like blaming the Mossad kiosk workers. It's more just like organized international crime. They'll kill three thousand people all at once because they'll kill that many people in a year and they'll plunge a continent into disarray to protect their interests. They have a nebulous right-wing agenda but that comes second as far as I can tell.

Just reading this thread I am going to have to buy a "Send in the clones" Atta story. Too many breadcrumbs in too many places. One of those places, though, is the Venice, FL airport. Stripper girlfriend or not, Rudi Dekker flying in 43 lbs (over 19,000 g) is proximity to organized crime.
User avatar
nathan28
 
Posts: 2957
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 6:48 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby nathan28 » Tue Jun 17, 2008 6:15 pm

unaltered wrote:LOL......well who else is going to do anything but ignore or agree with these thin accusations? The trick is to look at the claim and see if you can specifically disprove it without resorting to the endgame right away-----you know, it's all being orchestrated by------fill in the blank.


The trick is to listen to someone's purported explanation and see if they are speculating. It is particularly bad when you get to crap like "Why would Atta return a car the day before a suicide mission?" Maybe he returned it because he wanted to tie up loose ends, but I don't know, what his intentions or proclivities were. Loose Change is full of that crap... the moment you can propose an equally believable alternative, it indicates speculation.

On the other hand, journalism--like Hopsicker's or Gary Webb's, both of which end up in similar places--involves pounding pavement and making phone calls. Undoubtedly not all the leads are reliable, but it beats the pants off "They put c-4 in WTC during construction!" In fact, I'd say that the constant connections between certain intelligence agencies, banking institutions and drug trafficking should be more than enough that "it's all being orchestrated by------" isn't out of any question.

Michael Chertoff: "Frankly, we can't differentiate between terrorism and drug trafficking and organized crime." And who has trafficked drugs before? Principles in the US Gov't? Does that sound like a fifth column? Would evidence point to that maybe?
User avatar
nathan28
 
Posts: 2957
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 6:48 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby unaltered » Tue Jun 17, 2008 6:43 pm

nathan28 wrote:
unaltered wrote:LOL......well who else is going to do anything but ignore or agree with these thin accusations? The trick is to look at the claim and see if you can specifically disprove it without resorting to the endgame right away-----you know, it's all being orchestrated by------fill in the blank.


The trick is to listen to someone's purported explanation and see if they are speculating. It is particularly bad when you get to crap like "Why would Atta return a car the day before a suicide mission?" Maybe he returned it because he wanted to tie up loose ends, but I don't know, what his intentions or proclivities were. Loose Change is full of that crap... the moment you can propose an equally believable alternative, it indicates speculation.

On the other hand, journalism--like Hopsicker's or Gary Webb's, both of which end up in similar places--involves pounding pavement and making phone calls. Undoubtedly not all the leads are reliable, but it beats the pants off "They put c-4 in WTC during construction!" In fact, I'd say that the constant connections between certain intelligence agencies, banking institutions and drug trafficking should be more than enough that "it's all being orchestrated by------" isn't out of any question.

Michael Chertoff: "Frankly, we can't differentiate between terrorism and drug trafficking and organized crime." And who has trafficked drugs before? Principles in the US Gov't? Does that sound like a fifth column? Would evidence point to that maybe?


I'm not sure I would go so far as to say Hopsicker is anymore than a self proclaimed journalist. Most authentic investigative journalism I've seen tends to include the "other view," if you will. This is not to say I don't think he hasn't done some good work just not in relation to Keller et al. and the necessary follow up to their changing stories pre and post Hopsicker.

Aligning himself with Holocaust deniers doesn't help his creds either

http://www.fpp.co.uk/cinc/2002/speakers/index.html
unaltered
 
Posts: 345
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 9:55 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby barracuda » Tue Jun 17, 2008 7:05 pm

unaltered wrote:Most authentic investigative journalism I've seen tends to include the "other view," if you will.

Image

unaltered wrote:Aligning himself with Holocaust deniers doesn't help his creds either.

Now that's balanced reporting! Just a bit of a stretch, though.
The most dangerous traps are the ones you set for yourself. - Phillip Marlowe
User avatar
barracuda
 
Posts: 12890
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby nathan28 » Tue Jun 17, 2008 7:24 pm

barracuda wrote:
unaltered wrote:Most authentic investigative journalism I've seen tends to include the "other view," if you will.

Image

unaltered wrote:Aligning himself with Holocaust deniers doesn't help his creds either.

Now that's balanced reporting! Just a bit of a stretch, though.


"Real History"? And he was giving Mike Ruppert crap for speaking for Genesis or Pinnacle or whatever it's called now? Fuck. He has, uh, an interesting career arc. It's also fair to say that Hopsicker is only following one story-narrative... I'd like to see him get some gov't shill or one of these DAs in an interview sometime. I still think he's doing valuable work, but this crap makes me want to throw my arms up iin the air.
User avatar
nathan28
 
Posts: 2957
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 6:48 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby AlicetheKurious » Wed Jun 18, 2008 6:59 pm

nathan28 said:

Just reading this thread I am going to have to buy a "Send in the clones" Atta story. Too many breadcrumbs in too many places. One of those places, though, is the Venice, FL airport. Stripper girlfriend or not, Rudi Dekker flying in 43 lbs (over 19,000 g) is proximity to organized crime.


The Atta story is a mind-bending labyrinth -- to do it justice would require the kind of resources that I or anybody here could only dream of having. It's enough to say that for the first 23 years of his life, Mohamed Atta was a totally nondescript, absolutely typical middle-class Egyptian kid. There is nothing whatsoever to indicate that he was anything other than a shy, sheltered engineering graduate with minimal social skills who, like many others, had no particular political loyalties and only the kind of basic religious faith that's taken for granted here.

Even the claim, in the sensationalist and misleading words of the Cooperative Research headline that in 1990 "Mohamed Atta Joins Muslim Brotherhood Linked Group" is a laughable stretch: the so-called "Muslim Brotherhood Linked Group" is the Egyptian Union of Engineers, which all engineers join upon graduation in order to become eligible for things like subsidized medical insurance and pensions (my own late father, a totally apolitical Christian, was a member, like all other Egyptian engineers). The engineers' union also runs a subsidized sporting club with restaurants and recreational facilities where members can enjoy themselves for a reasonable price.

Again, from the Cooperative Research site (cue sinister music):

1995: Hijacker Atta Still Connected to Group Linked to Muslim Brotherhood

In a three-month trip to his hometown of Cairo, Egypt, 9/11 hijacker Mohamed Atta demonstrates that he is still a member of an engineering syndicate linked to the Muslim Brotherhood (see 1990). He takes the two Germans students he is traveling with, Volker Hauth and Ralph Bodenstein, to the syndicate’s eating club. According to Hauth, Atta does nothing during the trip he knows about that suggests he is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood, but the group’s influence on the club is obvious. [Washington Post, 9/22/2001] A former CIA officer who served undercover in Damascus, Syria, will later say, “At every stage in Atta’s journey is the Muslim Brotherhood.”


Link

Dum-dum-DUM!! Hilarious.

Yet, that's all they could come up with, regarding Atta's life in Egypt.

Back to 1992. Then came the fateful meeting with an anonymous German couple who, according to the Chicago Tribune, had "...stayed with friends who knew Atta's father, who was prodding his son to pursue graduate studies aboard.

His father's friends introduced Atta to the German couple, who spoke with the family in English. Atta, who had recently graduated with a degree in architectural engineering from the University of Cairo, told the couple he wanted to study architecture in Germany, but he had no particular idea where he should go.

"In this first conversation, we suggested he continue his studies in Hamburg and offered him a place to live at our house," the wife told investigators from the BKA, the German equivalent of the FBI. "He accepted this offer right away."

After studying German in Cairo, Atta arrived in the country on July 24, 1992, according to investigators' records. He moved into a rent-free room in the couple's small house in a quiet, middle-class neighborhood where children play in the street.


Link

From 1992, when he arrived in Germany and stayed with the German couple for a few months, then moved to student housing, until 1995, everything about Mohamed Atta makes sense, except for one bizarre thing about his official nationality that I'll bring up later.

But then, he abruptly disappeared in 1995 without any explanation, even to his close friend and fellow architecture student Volker Hauth, with whom he had traveled on academic trips in the summer of 1994 to Istanbul, and for three weeks in Aleppo and three months in Cairo to study Islamic architecture in 1994 and 1995. The trips were paid for by the same organization, the Carl-Duisburg Gesellschaft, that had brought Atta to Germany in the first place.

His co-workers at Plankontor, where he worked part-time, were informed about his 'pilgrimage' via a postcard from Saudi Arabia. According to them, when Atta returned after six months' absence (the "Hej" takes 3 weeks maximum), he sported a beard, and seemed more 'religious'.

This mysterious 'pilgrimage' in 1995 marks the beginning of many unexplained absences, including one for 15 months in 1997, which he explained as 'family visits'.

At the same time, his friend Volker Haupt said that Atta never mentioned that he had been on a pilgrimage:

It is at this point [upon his return from the pilgrimage - Alice] that odd gaps begin to open up in his life and the first evidence appears of his dissembling. Helga Rake at Plankontor said that he was absent for half of 1995 and that he said he had taken time out to make the pilgrimage to Mecca and return home. But Hauth said that neither on their subsequent visit to Cairo, nor at any time over the next few months, did the Egyptian mention a pilgrimage. This is all the more extraordinary given the German's keen interest in religion. 'It was the very basis of our relationship', he said.

Link

It was after Atta's first disappearance that everything seemed to change.

By 1996, the two friends had lost touch.

I wonder if sometime during the period between 1995 and 1997, the two 'Mohamed Attas' were both in Germany, leading parallel lives...a practice run, as it were, for the double, and a chance to fine-tune his impersonation with acquaintances of Atta. After the beard, 'Atta' later began to dress in flowing robes and wear a skull-cap, possibly to establish his fanatic credentials, and possibly to disguise any minor differences that might be noticeable to anyone who was familiar with the real Atta.

A female student who had occasionally chatted to [Atta] in 1994 to 1995 and knew him to be very reserved with women, was shocked when she saw him again in 1999: "He completely ignored me, twice, walked right past me, as if I didn't exist."

http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/arti ... hp?id=5362

The fake Atta's absences appear to coincide with his sightings at the former U.S. Air Force base in the Philippines in 1998 and 1999, where he was witnessed with a different girl in his room every night, drinking Johnny Walker Black Label whiskey and generally indulging in a bizarrely un-Islamic bacchanalia, at the same time being noticed for his abrupt rudeness, his stinginess and his secretiveness, along with a close-knit group of similarly party-hearty "Arab" men (Mista'aravim, perhaps getting a little R & R in the relative privacy and security of a former U.S. Air Force base run by retired American military personnel all the way in the Philippines? Duh.).

But where could the real Mohamed Atta have been? Who knows? There are reports of yet another Mohamed Atta registered at a medical school in Spain:

1997 or 1998: Atta in Two Places at Once?

Mohamed Atta, from a January, 1996 Egyptian passport photo. Spanish newspaper El Mundo later reports, “According to several professors at the Valencia School of Medicine, some of whom are forensic experts, [Mohamed Atta] was a student there in 1997 or 1998. Although he used another name then, they remember his face among the students that attended anatomy classes.” It is also suggested that “years before, as a student he went to Tarragona. That would explain his last visit to Salou [from July 8-19, 2001], where he could have made contact with dormant cells…”(see July 8-19, 2001) [El Mundo (Madrid), 9/30/2001] If this is true, it would contradict reports concerning Atta’s presence as a student in Hamburg, Germany, during this entire period. There is also a later report that in 1999 Atta will meet an al-Qaeda operative in Alicante, less than 100 miles from Valencia (see 1999).


Link

You'd figure that the FBI would have checked this out, but this story, like so many others about the many places of Mohamed Atta, is simply allowed to dangle inconclusively.

At the same time that Atta is a student in Germany and possibly in Spain, not to mention living it up at the Woodland Hotel in the Philippines, he is, according to the FBI, traveling on at least two occasions to Prague.

But wait:

1998: Atta Possibly Trains at Base Conducting Pilotless Aircraft Exercises

A military report released this year describes the “Joint Vision 2010” program, a series of “analyses, war games, studies, experiments, and exercises” which are “investigating new operational concepts, doctrines, and organizational approaches that will enable US forces to maintain full spectrum dominance of the battlespace well into the 21st century.” “The Air Force has begun a series of war games entitled Global Engagement at the Air War College, Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama.” The same report mentions that the military is working on a “variety of new imaging and signals intelligence sensors, currently in advanced stages of development, deployed aboard the Global Hawk, DarkStar, and Predator unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)…” [US Department of Defense, 1998]

Global Hawk is a technology that enables pilotless flight and has been functioning since at least early 1997. [US Department of Defense, 2/20/1997] While it may be mere coincidence, “Air Force spokesman Colonel Ken McClellan said a man named Mohamed Atta—which the FBI has identified as one of the five hijackers of American Airlines Flight 11—had once attended the International Officer’s School at Maxwell/Gunter Air Force Base in Montgomery, Ala.” But he adds that “there [was] discrepancies in the biographical data” (mainly the birth date) and that “it may just be a case of mistaken identity” (see also 1996-August 2000 and September 15-17, 2001) [Gannett News Service, 9/17/2001; Gannett News Service, 9/20/2001]


Link

Wowza. And all that's not counting all the training in 'a terrorist training camp in Afghanistan', during 1998 or 1999, or, according to the videotape found by the British Sunday Times, in January 2000:

The tape, according to the Sunday Times, is the only video that shows the two men together, reports CBS News foreign correspondent Richard Roth.

The British newspaper says the video was made on January 18, 2000, at an al Qaeda training camp in Afghanistan. A few days earlier, Osama Bin Laden had been addressing a group of his followers at the same training ground, reports Roth, including Ramzi Bin-Alshibh, the so-called coordinator of 9/11. Captured in 2002, Bin-Alshibh is now a prisoner a Guantanamo Bay.

The Sunday Times said it had obtained the video "through a previously tested channel" but gave no further details. It said sources from al-Qaeda and the United States had confirmed the video's authenticity on condition of anonymity.

It shows Atta and Jarrah sitting on the floor, and alternates between tight shots including only their faces and wider images which show what appears to be a gun propped up on the wall next to them. Both men have full, dark beards.

Atta wears a dark sweater or sweat shirt with a zipped-up collar and light-colored stripe pattern on the arms. He tries on a traditional Afghan cap at one point, then tosses it aside.

Jarrah is in a long white robe and wire-frame glasses, which he later removes.


CBS News

Interesting that this CBS News article neglects to mention the little fact that the video...had no sound. Just two faces smiling and laughing and reportedly making their last will and testament, silently.

Just as strange, are the conflicting reports, that Mohamed Atta was registered as a citizen of the United Arab Emirates since 1992 (!!!), which means that he was registered in Germany under a false identity long before he was 'radicalized', and which are absolutely contradicted by other reports that he was registered as an Egyptian in Germany, and only claimed to be from the UAE upon his arrival in the U.S. in 2000. Then again, he reportedly claimed to others at the aviation school in Florida, that he was a Saudi prince. Sounds like he became a pathological liar, not to mention a bit of a ham (pardon the pun) and an alcoholic, a blasphemer (Qurans in bars etc.), a gambler and a sex fiend (despite his close friends describing him as not interested in women) after he found God, in contrast to his rather staid life-long character before.

Although lead hijacker Mohamed Atta is Egyptian and is known to some German acquaintances as such, he registers as a UAE national in Hamburg. This will be confirmed after 9/11 by Hamburg’s interior minister, Olaf Scholz, who will say that his UAE nationality was recorded in the Ausländerzentralregister, a federal data base with personal data of foreign residents and asylum seekers. (BBC 9/13/2001; Erlanger 9/17/2001; Hamburg Interior Ministry 9/23/2001)

Commenting on this after 9/11, the Observer will say, “In many respects, though, he led not one life, but two. He repeatedly switched names, nationalities and personalities. If… in the US, he was Mohamed Atta, then at the Technical University of Harburg, he was Mohamed el-Amir. For the university authorities, he was an Egyptian, yet for his landlord, as for the US authorities, he was from the United Arab Emirates. And while it is not hard to see Atta, whose face gazes out from the passport photograph released by the FBI, as that of the mass murderer of Manhattan, el-Amir was a shy, considerate man who endeared himself to Western acquaintances.” (Hooper 9/23/2001)

It is unclear how or why Atta registered as a UAE national. In addition, throughout most of his time in Germany Atta is registered under a name variant, Mohamed el-Amir, and only registers using his full name after obtaining a new passport (see Late 1999), three weeks before leaving Germany for the US (see June 3, 2000). (US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division 7/31/2006)


Link

Here, I really should explain something about the supposedly false name, Mohamed al-Amir, as opposed to his 'true' name, Mohamed Atta. The way it works in Egypt, is, say your first name is John, and your father's first name is Michael, and your grandfather's first name is David. If you are Egyptian, your official name in Egypt, the one that appears on your official documents, is therefore "John Michael David". When only a first and last name are required, your name will be "John Michael".

When applying for things like visas and passports, particularly to North America, they specify that you should put your first name and the last name that appears on your official documents. In that case, you would put 'John David'. Mohamed Atta's father was named 'al Amir', so his name in Egypt, the one he'd gone by all his life, would have been 'Mohamed al-Amir'. When applying for a visa to the U.S., he would have put 'Mohamed Atta'. Nothing sinister about that, although it appears too complicated for many Western investigative journalists to figure out.

What makes no sense at all is the part about him being registered as a citizen of the UAE when he went to Germany in 1992 as a wide-eyed 23 year old with no agenda other than to profit from the wonderful opportunity offered by the scholarship to pursue his education. And yet, this is confirmed by Germany's Interior Ministry...

Just one final point about Atta and his uncanny ability to be in two places at the same time: according to the FBI, he only went to the U.S. for the first time in June 2000, after receiving his first American visa on May 18, 2000.

But Able Danger reportedly identified Mohamed Atta as a member of a "Brooklyn cell" of possible terrorists in February and March of 2000 (Able Danger was shut down in February 2001 and its documents destroyed 90 days later.

KLEINSMITH: I deleted that data roughly May, June time frame of 2000.

SPECTER: May, June 2000.

And did somebody instruct you to delete the information?

KLEINSMITH: We were visited by INSCOM's general counsel, and the man was named Tony Gentry. But he was only there 10 days prior to remind me of the intelligence regulation that we are operating under....

So that while we were shut down, we were unable to do any other further analysis, vetting of data or investigation into the data that we had polled.

Because of that, the 90-day mark had hit and he came back down to remind me again, and it was more of a friendly visit not an adversarial visit, and that was when he told me jokingly, "Remember, delete this data, or you guys will go to jail." And that's ha-ha, very funny -- understanding completely we abide by the regulation so we deleted the data and destroyed the charts...


quoted here.

You've got to wonder why it was so important that all documents related to Able Danger be destroyed, if they didn't contain the information that a "Mohamed Atta' meeting the description of the real Mohamed Atta was already in the U.S. This would have presented a big problem, since Mohamed Atta officially had not even applied for a visa to the U.S., and could be verified to be living in Germany at the time he was supposedly part of the 'Brooklyn cell'. Moreover, as I mentioned earlier, he had never used the name 'Mohamed Atta' before applying for a U.S. visa in May 2000.

The official story is that Able Danger did not, and could not have identified Mohamed Atta in February and March of 2000, and that even if it had identified him as a member of the 'Brooklyn Cell', this did not necessarily mean that he was physically in Brooklyn, since he could have been identified through telephone or other contacts with the other members.

But then, what about Johnelle Bryant's surreal meetings with 'Mohamed Atta' in April or early May 2000?

For another bizarre tale of doubles and identity theft, perhaps even more dramatic as a totally unbelievable case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, check out The Two Ziad Jarrahs. It broke my heart.

Phew! I'm totally sick of this, and I've only covered part of Atta's story up to June 2000.

Having chased the elusive Atta ghost in his various guises all over the net, I feel like a sucker. Which I am. Chasing the fake 'hijackers' is for rubes and people with far too much time on their hands, because it leads exactly nowhere. Certainly not to the actual planners and perpetrators of the September 11 attacks. These required an incredible level of access inside the military, financial and political establishment of the United States -- they were an inside job in the deepest meaning of the term. Al Qaeda had nothing to do it. Al Qaeda is the cover story. The misdirection. The smokescreen. Because even the tsunami of data about the fake 'hijackers' and their globe-trotting adventures yields exactly nothing, NOTHING that implicates them in the September 11 attacks. Nothing.

The bottom line is this: don't look at the birdie. Ask the four magic questions: who benefited? who had the motive, the means and the opportunity to carry out 9/11 and then confiscate and destroy the incriminating physical and other evidence? (WTC steel, airplane flight recordings, flight manifests, computer hard drives, amateur and cctv videos, etc.)

Anything else is just a waste of time.
"If you're not careful the newspapers will have you hating the oppressed and loving the people doing the oppressing." - Malcolm X
User avatar
AlicetheKurious
 
Posts: 5348
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 11:20 am
Location: Egypt
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby sunny » Wed Jun 18, 2008 7:41 pm

Thank you Alice. That is fascinating information about Atta and reminds me of the many Oswalds in the months and years before the Kennedy assassination.

Image

That's the real question, isn't it -- "Why?" -- the "how" is just "scenery" for the suckers . . . Oswald, Ruby, Cuba, Mafia, it keeps people guessing like a parlor game, but it prevents them from asking the most important question -- Why? Why was Kennedy killed? Who benefited? Who has the power to cover it up?
Choose love
sunny
 
Posts: 5220
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Alabama
Blog: View Blog (1)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests