The Diana Files - Modified Limited Hangout

by **antiaristo** » Sun Feb 12, 2006 11:16 pm

Yes indeedy. Nullify the Treason Felony Act and the entire pantomime collapses. Smithtalk, Thank you. I appreciate your concern. At every step of the way my number one priority has been the well-being of Victoria and Georgia. Many times the decisions have been difficult. Sometimes they have been counter-intuitive. Ever since that day my Guardian Angel whispered into my ear "Go to Ireland." I have followed my instincts. I will continue to do so, wherever it may lead.

by **antiaristo** » Tue Feb 14, 2006 9:50 am

Well, ain't that sweet. Look who's just emerged from the woodwork! From above <blockquote>Quote:<hr>Before dissecting the complex interrelationships among the "front companies," the many political and private players on both sides of the Atlantic, including the Bush family, Rumsfeld, Reagan, former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, her many level officials, Kock's vital role as MI6 infiltrator and overseer, the suppression of the infamous but little known Scott Report, the role of Peter Levine as former British defense official made chairman of Lloyd's of London, it's wise to look at the public statement made by former Astra Holdings PLC Chairman from 1980-90, Gerald Reaveley James, head of the company which became a leading ammunition and weapons manufacture and supplier to Iraq and Iran.<hr></blockquote> Right on cue... <blockquote>Quote:<hr>Levene attacks defence strategyBy Angela Jameson, Industrial Correspondent THE former chief of defence procurement under Margaret Thatcher has launched an outspoken attack on the Government’s Defence Industrial Strategy (DIS), saying that partnering is no substitute for competition in defence procurement. Lord Levene of Portsoken, chief of defence procurement from 1985 to 1991, told the Commons Defence Select Committee that the plan for the defence industry published by Lord Drayson, the Defence Procurement Minister, last December was a return to habits that he had worked hard to undo in his time at the Defence Procurement Agency. “One thing I have some fundamental difficulty with is the notion that partnering can be as effective as competition,” Lord Levene told the defence committee. When asked by James Arbuthnot, Conservative MP for North East Hampshire and chairman of the Defence Select Committee, whether the DIS was a move away from the concept of obtaining best value for money, Lord Levene said: “The document tries as well as it can — and I think it has been very carefully put together — to steer a middle course and to achieve as much as it can in both directions. We will never have a perfect solution.” Lord Levene, now chairman of Lloyd’s of London, was credited with introducing the principle of competition to defence procurement in the late 1980s. However, in the 1990s critics said that competition had deteriorated into an era of confrontation, in which the Ministry of Defence and BAE Systems, Britain’s biggest defence supplier, were often at loggerheads. John Smith, Labour MP for the Vale of Glamorgan, asked Lord Levene whether he was concerned that the Government was in danger of conflating the interests of one private company with the interests of the country. “If I may say so, you have effectively answered your own question,” Lord Levene said. Lord Levene’s comments are likely to surprise many in the defence industry. Although he makes clear that he is speaking in a personal capacity, he is the honorary president of the Defence Manufacturers’ Association and chairman of General Dynamics UK, the military communications group. The defence industry has welcomed the DIS and has heaped praise on Lord Drayson, the architect of the document. Lord Drayson said that Lord Levene had conceded in his evidence to the committee that the environment had changed greatly since 1991. “Where competition is appropriate, competition is a central part of our techniques, but, unlike in the 1980s, in some areas it is not possible to take a purely competitive approach,” Lord Drayson said. The AirTanker consortium is expected to begin fundraising for Britain’s largest Private Finance Initiative (PFI) in late spring, scotching rumours that the defence contract was on the verge of collapse. The £13 billion PFI deal is on course to be completed towards the end of the year, sources familiar with the process said. The deal will see a new generation of modern refuelling aircraft supplied to the RAF by a consortium of equipment manufacturers, led by EADS and including Rolls-Royce, Cobham and VT Group. AirTanker — the consortium running the programme — and the Ministry of Defence have been locked in talks for two years.<hr></blockquote> <a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,9069-2038881,00.html">business.timesonline.co.u...81,00.html</a>

by **antiaristo** » Wed Feb 22, 2006 7:21 pm

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>Al Fayed welcomes photographers' fines Press Association Wednesday February 22, 2006 9:03 PM Harrods tycoon Mohamed Al Fayed has welcomed the fining of three French photographers for invading the privacy of Diana, Princess of Wales, and his son Dodi on the night they died. Mr Al Fayed insisted the ruling in the Court of Appeal in Paris put in doubt the validity of the French investigation into their deaths - even though the court made the photographers pay a token sum of 68 pence. The millionaire, who believes the couple was murdered, filed the invasion of privacy complaint and said that each battle he fought was taking him closer to the truth. The three photographers were told to pay the token sum of 1 euro each (68p) for taking pictures of Diana and Dodi on the night of August 31, 1997. The case focused on three photos of them leaving the Ritz Hotel by car and three after the fatal car crash in the Pont D'Alma tunnel. Mr Al Fayed said in a statement: "I have always said that Judge Stephan was wrong. His investigation was deeply flawed and his findings perverse. "It is deeply disappointing that I am having to fight for so long and on so many fronts in order to get to the truth, but I am encouraged by the fact that each battle I fight takes me a step nearer to the truth, despite all the opposition and hostility that I encounter from those in power. "I am also encouraged by the overwhelming support I receive from the British public. This lovely couple were murdered, with the paparazzi being used as a cover for the murder, and sooner or later I will succeed in exposing the full facts, and the people who committed such a horrendous crime." Jacques Langevin, Christian Martinez and Fabrice Chassery were acquitted of invasion of privacy in 2003 after judges ruled that a crashed vehicle on a public highway is not a private area. But France's highest court disagreed in a ruling last April and sent the case to the Paris appeals court for review. The appeals court fined the men the symbolic 1 euro sum in a ruling last Friday, which has just been announced.<hr></blockquote> <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uklatest/story/0,,-5639859,00.html">www.guardian.co.uk/uklate...59,00.html</a>

by **sunny** » Mon Feb 27, 2006 12:13 pm

<a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-2059052,00.html">www.timesonline.co.uk/art...52,00.html</a> Diana driver was secret informer David Leppard THE chauffeur of the car in which Diana, Princess of Wales died was working for the French secret service, the British team reinvestigating her death has been told. The inquiry — headed by Lord Stevens, the former Metropolitan police commissioner — into the Paris car crash that killed Diana is now trying to obtain the chauffeur’s files from French intelligence but is being delayed by the reluctance of the authorities to hand them over. Stevens’s team has asked the country’s domestic intelligence service, the DST, to surrender all its “agent handling” files on Henri Paul, the chauffeur, to establish whether he was doing any work for his French intelligence bosses on the night of the crash. Paul crashed the car, killing himself, Diana and her boyfriend Dodi Fayed in a tunnel in central Paris in 1997. It has previously been claimed — and strenuously denied — that he worked for SIS, the secret intelligence service, also known as MI6. Well-placed sources say requests by the Stevens team for information about Paul’s activities on the day of the crash, and demands for complete records of tests taken on his blood after he died, have become bogged down by the “incredible bureaucracy” of the French justice system. The delays mean the £4m inquiry, ordered by the royal coroner in 2004, is certain to stretch into the latter part of this year and may not be completed before 2007. French police concluded the crash was an accident, caused by Paul driving the Mercedes in which Diana was travelling at high speed away from paparazzi while under the influence of drink and drugs. The role of Paul, who was deputy head of security at the Paris Ritz hotel, and what he was doing in the hours up to the crash are central to the inquiry. Mohamed al-Fayed, the Harrods tycoon and Dodi’s father who also owns the Paris Ritz, has claimed Diana and his son were murdered by British intelligence. Scotland Yard sources disclosed last week that the French government had finally confirmed Paul’s employment by the DST during discussions last year. A Yard source said: “We now know he was working for the French secret service and the French have got to give us access to the records of what he was doing. It’s an issue. We want to know where he was and what he was doing that evening.” After Paul’s death French police discovered he controlled secret accounts containing more than £100,000 in 14 banks across France. The Stevens inquiry has been complicated by the apparent refusal of the French authorities to allow Yard detectives to see several key witnesses to the accident. Stevens has said he is determined to “leave no stone unturned” in his investigation. He needs to establish beyond all doubt whether or not Paul was drunk and under the influence of powerful antidepressant drugs when he crashed the Mercedes. Concerned that there may have been a forensic mix-up, Stevens is trying to persuade the French public prosecutor’s office to disclose all records of how Paul’s blood was analysed. The Yard team has also had to wait for a new report by Dr Gilbert Pepin, the French toxicologist who analysed Paul’s blood after the crash. After a wrangle over the size of his fee for acting as an expert witness, Pepin has only recently supplied Stevens with a full account of his analysis of the blood taken from Paul’s body as it lay in the central Paris mortuary. Stevens is also waiting to interview the female laboratory technician who took the blood from Paul’s body. Fayed has claimed that MI6 agents visited the morgue on the night of the crash to plant evidence suggesting Paul was drunk, by substituting his blood for the alcohol-contaminated blood of a suicide victim. Sources say there were 25 bodies in the morgue that night. After two years of investigation, Stevens still takes the view that Diana’s death was an accident. However, he is conscious of the fact that many people still believe she was murdered.

by **sunny** » Fri Mar 03, 2006 2:04 pm

Could someone please help me with links to documentary evidence to the following assertions, which I have bolded? from:<a href="http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/february2006/270206dianadeath.htm">www.propagandamatrix.com/...adeath.htm</a> Diana Death Investigation Confirms Evidence Of Cover-up There can be no other conclusion than murder Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | Updated February 27 2006 The investigation into the death of Princess Diana, led by former Metropolitan Police Commissioner Lord Stevens, continues to confirm previously known facts and unearth new evidence proving that the August 31st 1997 crash was no accident. As previously exhaustively documented by this website, the evidence pointing to murder is conclusive. From the mid 1990's, Diana released a series of audio, videotapes and letters voicing her fears that she would be killed in a car crash made to look like an accident. In one letter, Diana stated, "My husband is planning ‘an accident’ in my car, brake failure and serious head injury in order to make the path clear for Charles to marry”. A brief summary of the known evidence is as follows. - The Pont de L'Alma tunnel was crawling with secret service personnel from French and British intelligence. The driver of the Mercedes, Henri Paul is now confirmed as having worked for the French secret service. - The unscheduled journey through the symbolic Pont de L'Alma tunnel (an ancient Pagan sacrificial site) took Diana and her boyfriend Dodi Al Fayed AWAY FROM their intended destination, Dodi's flat. - Just before the car entered the tunnel every police radio in Paris mysteriously died, preventing a quick response which could have saved Diana's life. - Just before the car entered the tunnel every security camera in the tunnel mysteriously died, preventing us from ever seeing footage of what caused the crash.- Eyewitnesses reported snipers and gunfire within the tunnel. - The crime scene was completely cleaned within hours of the crash, a policy totally anathema to standard preservation of any crime scene. - Diana was still alive after the crash. Unexplained delays in getting her to the hospital, caused by the slow speed of the ambulance and the fact that it passed several nearer hospitals before reaching its destination, ensured Diana was dead upon arrival. A faster response could have saved her life. - The Mercedes used to transport Dodi and Diana from the Ritz was mysteriously swapped for a car that had been stolen only weeks earlier. - The foremost reason put forward to explain the 'accident' - that driver Henri Paul was dangerously drunk, has been thoroughly debunked by the camera footage of his behavior before the crash and the fact that the tests on Paul's blood were either faked or swapped with the blood of another dead man. Paul's liver showed no sign of alcohol abuse and his close friends and family said he rarely drank alcohol. - Multiple eyewitnesses reported a mysterious flash of light immediately before the crash. Many insist that this was a laser directed at the driver to cause temporary blindness leading to the crash. - The initial French investigation into the crash went to every length to ignore key evidence, intimidate eyewitnesses into silence and outright fabricate evidence. It is important to stress that a detailed compendium of the evidence pointing to murder would fill a book on its own. Diana was killed because she was pregnant with Dodi's child and the British Royal Family didn't want an Arab in their sacred bloodline. Diana was also becoming politically involved in the Middle East and the elite saw her as a loose cannon that could rally popular support around anything. Diana herself remarked to reporters that there would be 'a big surprise' from her a few days before her death. Lord Steven's previous enquiry into Irish Republican Army terrorism unearthed links to British intelligence but seemed to disappear down the memory hole. Our hope is that the inquiry will have some genuine consequences for the criminals who assassinated 'England's Rose' and that it will prevent them from engaging in similar political hits in the future. ---------------------------------------------------

by **antiaristo** » Fri Mar 03, 2006 2:54 pm

sunny, Some quick feedback from myself. Starman and DrdebugDU (I miss him) are far better researchers. <blockquote>Quote:<hr>was crawling with secret service personnel from French and British intelligence<hr></blockquote> I've seen this before. Sir Richard Dearlove was reported as there at the time. He was head of SIS/MI6 at the time, and it was he that reported to Blair that "The intelligence was being fixed around the policy" in the Downing Street Minutes. <blockquote>Quote:<hr>- Just before the car entered the tunnel every security camera in the tunnel mysteriously died, preventing us from ever seeing footage of what caused the crash<hr></blockquote> I've seen that too. That's why I knew Chirac had to be involved. He was two times Mayor of Paris immediately before becoming President of the Republic (see Cleary to Chirac 30 July 2003) <blockquote>Quote:<hr>- The Mercedes used to transport Dodi and Diana from the Ritz was mysteriously swapped for a car that had been stolen only weeks earlier.<hr></blockquote> I've seen that too. Apparently the car they intended to use would not start. I dont like the final paragraph because they have the MOTIVATION wrong. What I know is that a few days before she died she gave an interview to a french magazine - it might have been Paris Match. In the interview she said "I would rather be with those down below than with those up above." Also Paul Burrell reported receiving a phone call the day before she died. She was expected home that day but she told him "Something unexpected has come up and I have to stay an extra day". She wanted him to tell the boys. It was on that "extra day" that she died. Hope that helps. Added on edit <blockquote>Quote:<hr>- Multiple eyewitnesses reported a mysterious flash of light immediately before the crash<hr></blockquote> I made a reference to David Shayler. Then slimmouse provided a link to an affidavit by Richard Tomlinson (ex SIS/MI6) What annoys me is that nobody listens to Diana herself. She TOLD US why they wanted to murder her. So that Charles would be free to marry. Why do people keep making up other "reasons" when she TOLD US HERSELF? Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=antiaristo>antiaristo</A> at: 3/3/06 12:11 pm

by **sunny** » Fri Mar 03, 2006 3:11 pm

It does help, anti. It just frustrates the hell out of me when people write articles linking to sources on some allegations and not others. I had never heard of or read the material I bolded and as they are very bold assertions, I need more than just the word of the author. Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=sunny@rigorousintuition>sunny</A> at: 3/3/06 12:12 pm

by **antiaristo** » Fri Mar 03, 2006 3:27 pm

I'm going to cross post this so that people can see for themselves how important it is that Charles is "free to marry" As the Guardian implies, it's not often you get TWO examples of gross hypocrisy in a single item of correspondence. But Charles Windsor, the people's "dissident", has managed to do so. You people can vote your head of state out of office. Even the dreadful George W Bush is now a lame duck because he cannot be elected again, so you could argue that his tenure lasted five-and-a-half years. THESE people, by contrast, we are stuck with for life. That's why it matters. <blockquote>Quote:<hr>11.45am Charles 'rubbished' Human Rights Act defence Michael McDonough Thursday March 2, 2006 Prince Charles wrote "rubbish" on a letter defending the Human Rights Act, a leaked copy of the document showed today. The letter was part of an exchange between the prince and the former Lord Chancellor Lord Irvine of Lairg about a perceived rise in litigiousness in British society. Charles - involved in high court litigation in an attempt to prevent a newspaper publishing further extracts from his journals - wrote to Lord Irvine in June 2001. He expressed concern that the Human Rights Act risked promoting an "American-style personal injury 'culture'." A copy of the letter appeared in the Guardian in September 2002 after being leaked to the Daily Mail. Today's edition of the Times printed Lord Irvine's response, complete with handwritten comments from the heir to the throne. In the leaked letter, the peer rejected the claim that Britain was heading towards a compensation culture. "There is in fact scant evidence that people overall are becoming more litigious," he wrote. "There has been no upward trend in the work of the civil courts over recent years." The prince underlined a statement beginning: "[I see the challenge we face as ensuring that] as we become a society more based on responsibilities and rights ..." According to the Times, he dismissed the claim with the handwritten comment: "But this is rubbish - we're a society based on rights alone." The part of the letter featuring those comments was not visible in the paper today. A spokeswoman for the Department for Constitutional Affairs refused to confirm the authenticity of the letter, saying: "We don't comment on leaked documents." No one was immediately available for comment at the prince's Clarence House office. Leaked contents of a letter from Charles to Lord Irvine in February 2002 - which appeared in the Guardian in September that year - were also printed in today's Times. In it, the prince returned to his fears over litigation and the Act. The correspondence began four years before Charles married Camilla Parker Bowles in a wedding only made possible by the Human Rights Act, which came into force in 2000. The current Lord Chancellor, Lord Falconer, deployed the legislation to allow the civil ceremony, which would have been unlawful for members of the Royal Family under the Marriage Act. In the high court case, the prince's former aide Mark Bolland last month said the heir saw himself as a "dissident" working against current political opinion. A three-day hearing in that case drew to a close last week, and the judge's decision on whether to hold a full jury trial will not be known for several weeks. When Charles's letters to the Lord Chancellor were first made public in 2002, they prompted criticism that the prince was interfering in the party political arena. However, the prime minister, Tony Blair, said the prince was entitled to express his opinions to ministers.<hr></blockquote> <a href="http://politics.guardian.co.uk/homeaffairs/story/0,,1721835,00.html">politics.guardian.co.uk/h...35,00.html</a> So litigation leads to a compensation culture, and is to be discouraged - unless it is a prince who wants to litigate. And the Human Rights Act is rubbish - unless it is a prince who wants to use it. Actually it is much worse than that. The Prince of Wales used the right to marry to "trump" the Marriage Act. But this is the text of the Human Rights Act on the right to marry. <blockquote>Quote:<hr>ARTICLE 12 RIGHT TO MARRY Men and women of marriageable age have the right to marry and to found a family, according to the national laws governing the exercise of this right.<hr></blockquote> Yes, read it again. The Human Rights Act CANNOT be used to override the Marriages Act, on its own terms. THE MARRIAGE IS A FRAUD ON ITS FACE.

by **antiaristo** » Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:18 pm

There is so much here I wanted to bold, I'm bolding nothing at all. But the message is unmistakeable. Comments, sunny? <blockquote>Quote:<hr>Queen's album: Diana in, Camilla outBy Andrew Pierce An 80th birthday website tribute is full of surprises for the family THE Queen has rehabilitated the late Diana, Princess of Wales, to a central role in a photograph album to celebrate her 80th birthday in April. There is no room in the website tribute, which records all the important events in the Queen’s life in every decade since her birth in 1926, for a photograph of the Duchess of Cornwall, who married the Prince of Wales last year. There is a further omission in the chronicle of significant events, worldwide and royal, that accompanies each decade. While the second marriage of the Prince of Wales does not merit a mention in the significant events of the decade that began in 2000, pride of place is given to the two gold medals that Dame Kelly Holmes won at the 2004 Olympic Games. The Queen has also included a photograph of the Duchess of York, despite the embarrassment her antics caused the Royal Family over the years. Buckingham Palace has included three photographs of the Princess, who has in effect been airbrushed out by the Windsors since her death in 1997. After the marriage of the Waleses ended in 1996 the Queen removed the HRH title from Diana. The Duchess of York was also stripped of her title on her divorce. The first image of the Princess of Wales in the website tribute is at the christening of Prince Harry in 1984 under the heading: “Family Photograph Album, a Gallery of Images from the Queen’s Family.” In the second photograph, taken in 1989, a smiling Princess, in a wide-brimmed hat, dominates the balcony scene at Buckingham Palace watching the flypast after the Trooping the Colour. The Queen, the Duke of Edinburgh, the Prince of Wales and Princes William and Harry are by her side. In 1994 there is a picture of the Princess, who by this time had been separated from her husband for two years, leaving St Mary Magdalene Church in Sandringham on Christmas Day with the Queen, Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother and Princess Margaret. The final image is of the Queen and the Queen Mother on the steps of Westminster Abbey after the funeral service for the Princess. A courtier said: “In two decades of her reign Diana was a huge and and important part of the Royal Family. She is also the mother of two of the Queen’s grandchildren which is why she is represented.” The Duchess of York is pictured at the christening of her daughter, Princess Eugenie, in 1990. The website, which includes previously unseen photographs, records the big events of the Queen’s life. The 1930s includes the Abdication; the 1940s, victory in the Second World War; the 1950s, the wedding of Princess Grace and Prince Rainier of Monaco; the 1960s, the Beatles receiving their MBE insignia at Buckingham Palace. The 1970s records Princess Anne representing the Britain at the Montreal Olympics in 1976 and the Queen’s Silver Jubilee. In the 1980s the highlight is: “The Royal wedding. Prince Charles marries Lady Diana Spencer in July 1981. The event draws a global television audience of 700 million.” The photograph chosen is the famous image of the couple’s kiss on the balcony of Buckingham Palace. The 1990s includes an aerial shot of the funeral of the Princess and shows the vast crowds that lined the streets in silent tribute. For the decade beginning 2000, the events chronicled by Buckingham Palace include the Golden Jubilee, the 100th birthday of the Queen Mother, war in Iraq, London winning the 2012 Olympics, the bombings on the London Underground, and gold for Dame Kelly. The restoration of Diana to the Queen’s family album will delight her sons William and Harry, and millions of her admirers in Britain who feel that she was too hastily excised from the Royal Family’s history books. At Kensington Palace, Diana’s name was virtually erased soon after her death. On the public tours of Buckingham Palace’s State Rooms, there is not one mention of the mother of the future King. The Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fountain has been a public relations fiasco.<hr></blockquote> <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/printFriendly/0,,1-2-2067164-2,00.html">www.timesonline.co.uk/pri...-2,00.html</a>

by **StarmanSkye** » Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:47 pm

I didn't find anything that specifically corroborated the claim that Henri Paul was a secret French agent, but I found quite a few other tidbits with sources and links that help fill-in the story of Diana's murder and cover-up. The connections of Khashoggi, LeWinter and Russbacher are especially intriguing and merit further study, as does reference to Faction 2 of US Navel Intelligence, Phillipine Gold, Group 26 aka Defense Intelligence Services (hit-team), and Operation 'Submarine' (not it's real name), re: the manipulated resurfacing of obscure, classified documents). No telling how much of the following is disinfo or half-truths or dead-ends -- the trail of Who, How, What, misc. When and even Why has a lot of confusing twists and turns to it. More if/as/when I stumble onnit. Starman ****** Diana Accident -- General News Reports Complilation <a href="http://www.public-interest.co.uk/diana/dipress.htm">www.public-interest.co.uk...ipress.htm</a> Diana was NOT the Target (2001): <a href="http://www.rumormillnews.com/DIANA%20WAS%20THE%20TARGET%20REDMAN.htm">www.rumormillnews.com/DIA...REDMAN.htm</a> (Good source of misc. information details, esp. re: theory deliberate murder arranged by Prince Phillip w/cover-story that Dodi was the 'intended' target -- to deflect in-family suspician by Harry, William et al. that 'dad had mom killed' -- Lots of interesting speculation here) --excerpt-- All 17 close-circuit cameras on the route from the Ritz to the Pont l'Alma tunnel were not functioning. [5]. This system of video surveillance had never before malfunctioned all at the same time. [5]. Simultaneous to the camera system failure, all police communications frequencies in central Paris went down. [5] Icke, David. The Biggest Secret. ISBN: 0-9526147-6-6 Ex-British intelligence agent Richard Tomlinson says that MI6 (British intelligence, similar to the CIA) had assassination mechanics already worked out whereby to murder "a Serb leader"; he says the plan "eerily mirrors" the "car accident" deaths of Dodi and Diana. [8]. The American CIA, the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA), and other U.S. intelligence agencies had been spying on Diana for several years. [9]. The CIA routinely "bugged" her phone calls. [8]. The NSA admits it has 39 NSA-originated and NSA-controlled documents -- 124 pages altogether -- of top-secret information on Diana. [9] These U.S. spy agencies, as a matter of procedure, forwarded the results of their spying to their British counterparts. [9]. It was not just the demonized "paparazzi" who were intensely interested in what Diana was up to. [9] Smith, Bob. "CIA Kept Top-Secret Files on Di." Star. Dec. 22, 1998. [1<img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/alien.gif ALT="0]"> Allan, Rayelan. "October Surprise and the Murder of Princess Diana." Conspiracy Nation, Vol. 11 Num. 82. See web site URL in #2, above. Reportedly, Diana's true killers belonged to an international conglomerate of intelligence services, known as Defense Intelligence Services (a.k.a. "Group 26"), based in Bristol, England. [1<img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/alien.gif ALT="0]"> . When independent journalist Sherman Skolnick began delving into this connection, he was warned off the story by one of the alleged members of Group 26, Gunther Russbacher. (This editor listened to a tape-recording of Russbacher's polite warning to Skolnick; apparently unknown to Russbacher: Skolnick had taped the phone call.) Dodi's actual murderer may have been what the Globe "tabloid" described as "a shadowy figure from the French underworld" with ties to British intelligence. [11]. He may have been the one who, immediately after the car crash, "reached into the car, as if he was checking to see if Dodi was alive," and broke Dodi's neck. [1]. [1<img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/alien.gif ALT="0]"> Allan, Rayelan. "October Surprise and the Murder of Princess Diana." Conspiracy Nation, Vol. 11 Num. 82. See web site URL in #2, above. [11] "Crash Investigation." Globe. June 26, 2001. [1] Allan, Rayelan. "Diana Was Not The Target." Paranoia magazine. #24, Fall 2000. See also www.paranoiamagazine.com As the Mercedes neared the area of the tunnel, an unknown motorcyclist blocked an off ramp, thereby forcing the car to enter the tunnel. [8] In the Pont l'Alma tunnel, a flash of light (NOT "paparazzi" camera flashbulbs) from an extremely powerful "anti-personnel device" momentarily blinded Henri Paul. [6]. The car, stolen earlier that year, had been tampered with [6] A momentarily blinded Mr. Paul, poisoned, lost control of the vehicle and it crashed into a pillar. Contrary to erroneous press reports which had the car going much faster upon impact, the Mercedes was going less than 60 mph. [6]. [6] Hounam, Peter & McAdam, Derek. Who Killed Diana? ISBN: 1-883319-87-0 The LeWinter Affair Oswald LeWinter was recruited into the CIA during the Vietnam War. He grew disgusted with the Agency and eventually turned renegade. [6] (By "renegade" is meant, sort of like Diana herself: "a loose cannon.") John McNamara, Mohamed Al-Fayed's chief of security, says that in April 1998 his boss was contacted by high-power attorney Keith Fleer. Fleer arranged for McNamara and Al-Fayed to meet Oswald LeWinter in Austria. LeWinter claimed he had secret CIA files on Diana and Dodi; he'd sell them for $20 million. [8].LeWinter claimed that Mercedes driver Henri Paul had been poisoned and that the car had been tampered with; LeWinter produced documents supporting his claims. [6] But on April 22nd, LeWinter was pounced on by FBI agents. (FBI nabs him in Austria?) [5]. They said he was -- get this -- selling phony documents. LeWinter was arrested and charged with fraud. (FBI goes to Austria to nab someone selling phony documents?) The LeWinter documents were not phony. LeWinter was offered a deal by the authorities: "Play ball with us; say that, 'Yes, the documents are fake,' and you'll get a simple fraud charge. Otherwise, you'll face charges of high treason (for stealing and disseminating classified information) in the United States." [1] One of the supposedly fraudulent documents was published: first, in a Vienna newspaper; later in the London Mirror. Here is what it said: DOMESTIC COLLECTION DIVISION Foreign Intelligence Information Report Directorate of Intelligence WARNING NOTICE -- INTELLIGENCE SOURCES AND METHODS INVOLVED. FURTHER DISSEMINATION AND USE OF THE INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CONTROLS STATED AT BEGINNING AND END OF REPORT. REPORT CLASS: TOP SECRET. REPORT NO. 00.D 831/173466-97 COUNTRY: France DATE DISTR: 17 June 1997. SUBJECT: File overview: Diana Princess of Wales - Dodi. REFERENCES DCI Case 64376. SOURCE: CASParis/CASLondon/COSGeneva/CASKingston/ UK citizen Ken Etheridge. 1. Relationship initiated between Diana POW and Dodi aF according to reliable intel sources in November 1996. Intimacy begins shortly after they meet. (Report filed) 2. Reliable source reports Palace seriously disturbed by liaison. PM considers any al Fayed relationship politically disastrous. Edinburgh sees serious threat to dynasty should relationship endure. Quote reported: "Such an affair is racially and morally repugnant and no son of a bedouin camel trader is fit for the mother of a future king." Edinburgh. (Report filed) 3. Request from highest circles to DEA attache UK for 6 on Dodi re: Cocaine. See file forwarded to UK embassy DC. (Copy filed) 4. U.S. liaison to MI6 requested by David Spedding for assistance in providing permanent solution to Dodi problem. Blessing of Palace secured (Twiz filed) 5. WHuse [White House] denies Spedding request. Harrison authorized only to arrange meeting for MI-6 representative with K-Team Geneva. (Twiz on file) 6. Meeting in Geneva reportedly successful (Report filed) 7. Al Fayed Mercedes limo stolen and returned with electronics missing. Reliable intel source confirms K-team involved. Source reports car rebuilt to respond to external radio controls. (Report filed) [1] Diana Was The Target Eliminating only Dodi Fayed would not solve the Diana problem, nor would eliminating both Dodi and the unborn child. Diana had to be silenced. Diana was the target. Many reputable professionals agree: it was not an accident that Diana died; she was murdered. [6] [11] Governments kill thousands of people each day, in the name of "national security." What difference would 3-and-a-half more bodies make to them? "The State is the coldest of all cold monsters." [Nietzche] Diana divorced Prince Charles on August 28, 1996. Almost exactly to the day, one year later, Diana was killed. Both Diana and the actress Marilyn Monroe were born on the first of the month. Both died, at age 36, in August. (The "loose cannon" Monroe's murderers restrained her and inserted a specially doctored Nembutal suppository into her anus; see Double-Cross by Sam and Chuck Giancana. ISBN: 0-446-36412-6.) Monroe, the Queen of Diamonds, and Diana, the Queen of Hearts, were the subjects of the Elton John song, "Candle in the Wind," which Mr. John sang at Diana's funeral. --unquote-- PRINCE WILLIAM HIRES MI5 AGENT TO HUNT DOWN HIS MOTHER'S KILLERS <a href="http://www.rumormillnews.net/cgi-bin/config.pl?read=11119">www.rumormillnews.net/cgi...read=11119</a> Hmmm ... Here's a peculiar bit of tragic trivia: During the four weeks following her funeral, the overall suicide rate in England and Wales rose by 17%, compared with the average reported for that period in the four previous years. Researchers suggest that this was caused by the "identification" effect, as the greatest increase in suicides was by people most similar to Diana: women aged 25 to 44, whose suicide rate increased by over 45%. <a href="http://www.popstarsplus.com/politicians_princessdiana.htm">www.popstarsplus.com/poli...sdiana.htm</a> **** Misc. Diana Conspiracy Links: Death of the Princess <<a href="http://www.londonnet.co.uk/ln/talk/news/diana_conspiracy_theories.html>">www.londonnet.co.uk/ln/ta...ries.html></a> (LondonNet.co) Diana: Secret Documents Revealed <<a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/04/20/48hours/main612794.shtml>">www.cbsnews.com/stories/2...794.shtml></a> (CBSNews.com: Apr. 21, 2004) Princess Diana – Murder Coverup <<a href="http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?ChannelID=41>">www.conspiracyplanet.com/...nnelID=41></a> (ConspiracyPlanet.com) Princess Diana’s Death: The Intro and Overview <<a href="http://www.coverups.com/diana/>">www.coverups.com/diana/></a> (CoverUps.com) Princess Diana Was the Target <<a href="http://www.shout.net/~bigred/Diana.htm>">www.shout.net/~bigred/Diana.htm></a> (Shout.net) Who Killed Princess Diana? <<a href="http://www.ishipress.com/diana.htm>">www.ishipress.com/diana.htm></a> (IshiPress.com) ***** Very good analysis re: credibility of witnesses, 'fake' or real: <a href="http://www.wethepeople.la/witness.htm">www.wethepeople.la/witness.htm</a> 'The Upcoming Witness Summit: Who's Fake and Who's Real' --excerpt re: evidence surveillance cameras were working, Traffic-accident police were monitoring cars in the tunnel-- JEAN-PASCAL PEYRET. Was exiting the Alma tunnel when he and his wife heard a tremendous crash. However, he didn't realize until the next morning that the crash he heard had been the Mercedes carrying Diana. According to him, "We must have been at least fifty yards in front of the Mercedes. I heard two impacts. It is totally possible that the first one was the collision with the second car." Peyret added that right after the crash, his car was passed by a motorcycle. "The motorcycle passed us, but I can't say it was fleeing. Obviously, he was at the scene of an accident and did not stop." There is an interesting sidebar to Peyret's story, which, in a crucial slip-up by the French authorities, proves that the surveillance cameras outside the tunnel were working that night, despite French police claims to the contrary. Peyret, once he realized it was indeed Diana who had died in the crash he and his wife had heard the previous night, immediately called the police. They took down his name and phone number and said they would call him back. Here is how Death of a Princess describes it: "Monsiur Peyret?" said the caller. "This is the criminal brigade. Thank you for contacting us. As a matter of fact, we were expecting your call." Peyret found the remark curious, and vaguely worrisome. How could they possibly have been expecting his call? There is only one answer: surveillance cameras outside the tunnel were working that night. They undoubtedly got his license plate number from the surveillance photos, ran his license through their computers, found out he was the owner of the car, and knew he would be calling because the photos showed he had been in the tunnel at or about the time of the crash. There is no other way conceivable that they could have known he would be calling. It also shows the search for the missing Uno (and let us not forget the "powerful bike" too) is a farce. Since the surveillance cameras were indeed working, it would be a simple matter for the French to track down the Uno, if they really wanted to. Still more proof, if any were needed, the French are engaged in a criminal coverup in the murder of Diana, Dodi, and Henri Paul. --unquote-- <a href="http://www.wethepeople.la/diforum2.htm#QUEEN">www.wethepeople.la/diforum2.htm#QUEEN</a> Speculation on ambulance as 'deathwagon', Paris Police Commissioner implicated in British plot to substitute Assassination agents for emergency medical personnel, deliberate one-hour ambulance delay allowed Diana to bleed-out; Also, witness testimony re: a downed motorcyle at accident scene NEVER acknowledged in official accounts -- strongly suggests conspiracy. Archive. **** Diana Murdered: CIA Documents, assassination team authorized by the Queen <a href="http://www.naturalhealthholistic.com/dodi-1.html">www.naturalhealthholistic...odi-1.html</a> --excerpt-- An article written by "Ru Mills" (pseudonym) and published in Conspiracy Nation (CN 12.0<img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/glasses.gif ALT="8)"> gave details on the arrest of a "George Mearah" (apparently also known as Oswald LeWinter) for allegedly trying to sell top secret CIA documents to Mohamed Al-Fayed, father of Dodi Al-Fayed who died with Princess Diana in a suspicious car crash on August 31, 1997. This development was covered in several wire service and some newspaper reports. For example: "A man was arrested in a hotel lobby in Vienna as he tried to sell documents to Mohamed Fayed that allegedly proved that his son Dodi and Diana, Princess of Wales, were murdered." (Electronic Telegraph, 4/30/9<img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/glasses.gif ALT="8)"> "The suspect, a 67-year-old man whose name was withheld, had been peddling documents which purported to be evidence of a supposed murder plot, by implication involving British and U.S. intelligence." (Reuters, 4/29/9<img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/glasses.gif ALT="8)"> A further update on the situation was reportedly broken on May 14, 1998, in a story appearing in the London Mirror newspaper. The Mirror apparently included one of the purported secret papers in its May 14th edition. Here is an excerpt from the blockbuster story: Mr. [Mohamed] Fayed believes the Diana papers, said to originate from the US Central Intelligence Agency, back his conviction that the British establishment masterminded a conspiracy against his son and the Princess . . . . Mr. Al Fayed said yesterday, "I intend to establish the truth behind the tragic events in Paris last August." . . . MI6 Director David Spedding is named in one telex and a squad from the Israeli secret service Mossad, referred to as the "K-Team", appears in another. [The documents] were seized in an Amsterdam hotel room three weeks ago when Mr. Al Fayed's security chief, backed by two FBI agents, met a middleman who was demanding 10 million (Pound Sterling) for them. The intermediary, 67 year old Oswald LeWinter, was arrested and is now in solitary confinement in a Vienna police cell. *** In April 1998, Dodi's father sent his chief of security to meet in Vienna, Austria, with someone offering to sell documents for 10 million British pounds. The documents reportedly show that British Intelligence had asked the American CIA to help murder Princess Diana. Apparently, in a cynical trick to surface the whole mess without paying big money, the CIA and FBI were asked to monitor the meeting. Thereafter, the CIA and FBI had the mystery man - the one offering to sell the documents - arrested. [1] He reportedly is a retired officer of the U. S. Naval Intelligence (ONI), reportedly knows ONI Commander Russbacher, and is well-informed on Operation Clydesdale-type assassinations. The documents had apparently been stolen from the FBI's counter-intelligence wing, Division 5. British and American covert operatives were in the team of cars which pushed Diana's Mercedes up against a pillar, causing the death of Dodi and Diana. The American agents in Vienna claimed they had jurisdiction to arrest the mystery man, because stealing the documents violated U. S. national security. Among the secrets contained: that Bill Clinton, as president, had offered to assist Diana-in-exile to become a U.S. citizen, along with her new husband, Dodi. So, the new King of England, Diana's eldest son, would have been raised in Los Angeles under the wing of his step-father, an Arab - unacceptable to the Monarchy. The trial of the arrested mystery man is to be in secret, in a soundproof court, in the District of Columbia. Some, but not all, of these details were in wire service stories. But the mass media pretended they didn't exist. Hey: Call up your local newsfakers and tell them to stop lying about what happened to Princess Diana and Dodi Al-Fayed, huh? [1] For more info, see a previous issue of Conspiracy Nation (CN), CN 12.08. ********* <a href="http://www.naturalhealthholistic.com/dodi-2.html">www.naturalhealthholistic...odi-2.html</a> Conspiracy Nation -- Vol. 10 Num. 98 ("Quid coniuratio est?") U.K., French, Journalists Confide: "PRINCESS DIANA WAS ASSASSINATED." This is Sherman Skolnick. In the last few days I have interviewed, extensively, well-informed United Kingdom (UK), French, and other journalists. (And I promised never to use their names because of the nature of what was discussed.) They told me that many of the distinguished journalists in the United Kingdom are aware, from their own reliable sources in key places in the government and elsewhere, that British Intelligence had assassinated Princess Diana. They went over details, of the specifics of how they, as journalists, from their sources (separate from me), know about the technical information on how the assassination was carried out. But first of all, we have to discuss why the real story is not being told, in print, or on the radio, or on television, in the UK. Not many know that in the UK they have the Official Secrets Act. By that Act, the London government has the power, throughout the UK, to order that certain subjects are absolutely forbidden to be discussed. Currently, the forbidden subject is any discussion of possible foul play in the death of Princess Diana and her intended husband Dodi Fayed. Further than that, any discussion is forbidden about how the Official Secrets Act exactly works. When there is a subject that an editor, publisher, or station manager believes would be covered by the Official Secrets Act, they must immediately inform the London government. And if the London government issues what they call a "D Notice," then these media outlets throughout the UK are not only forbidden to go forward with any story that they're working on; but also, the D Notice serves as a potential seizure: it authorizes the UK, through their various operatives, to immediately seize and close down any printing plant that is in the process of printing such a story, any radio station, or any radio or TV transmitter. They are immediately seized by the London government, closed down, and the publisher, the editor, and the key personnel (including the writer of the story) are immediately put under arrest. And the worst part of it is, the rest of the media is not even allowed to mention that these people have been arrested and their publishing and transmitting facilities seized. In other words, it is forbidden to discuss the D Notice and also forbidden to discuss the technical operation of the Official Secrets Act. So, there is censorship regarding the instruments of censorship. The journalists I spoke with generally agree with what I found out from other sources about how Diana was assassinated. Apparently another car, a supposed "decoy car" which was to protect her, in fact carried agents of British Intelligence. It came up behind the Mercedes which Diana and the others were in and hit it in some way. And there was already an arrangement through others that a chemical slick was put on the roadway within the tunnel. Ahead of the slick, a heavy construction truck, on signal, backed into the tunnel and dropped or placed an obstruction of a very heavy nature in the roadway. So any which way it turned around, the Diana car could not have gotten away. Thereafter, British Intelligence planted disinformation (and continues to do so) throughout the world. (For example, "The car came from a junkyard; it was formerly stolen; it's a defective car," "The driver was drunk," "The speedometer was stuck at 120; the car was going over 100 mph.") There's been a flood of these fake stories promoted worldwide by British Intelligence, in which the CIA has seen to it that the American press replicates these stories. Leading journalists in the UK agree with stories by me and others that Diana was assassinated. And the simple reason for the murder is, British Intelligence is pledged to protect the monarchy. The monarchy was *not* going to have a new step-father for the heir to the throne, Prince William; they weren't going to have a Moslem. Further than that, it comes out that Diana had already been given an engagement ring by Dodi Fayed. What has *not* come out is that she was 3-months pregnant. So when you put that together, British Intelligence, under their rules, was "justified" in wiping these people out for the purposes of the monarchy, protection of the realm, and "national security." *** OCTOBER SURPRISE AND THE MURDER OF PRINCESS DIANA ===================================================== By Rayelan Allan Russbacher ---------------------- Starting in 1984 and ending in 1990, I worked with Barbara Honneger, author of "October Surprise". During this time I had many conversations with the editors of EIR [Executive Intelligence Review], sharing both information and Sources. I have recently read information which was put out by EIR regarding the death of Princess Diana. I would like to speak with one of your investigators. I believe I may be able to point YOU in a direction you haven't explored yet. At the time I was talking with EIR, my name was Raye Allan. In 1989, I married the man who would become known as "The October Surprise Pilot", Gunther Russbacher. [1] After 8 long years of trying to free him from prison, I was successful. On the day he was released, he left me for an English film producer, the former partner (business and otherwise) of the late documentary film producer, Allan Frankovich. Gunther and his new wife live in Bristol, England. I have been told by people within the intelligence world that Bristol is the headquarters for a mysterious group of intelligence agencies known as "Group 26". I have also been told that the official name is Defense Intelligence Services . . . DIS. Supposedly, DIS is a reincarnation of NIS (Navy Intelligence Services). This doesn't fit in with the rest of the information I have received about the mysterious "Group 26". I have been told that it is made up of international intelligence services . . . not just American Intelligence. I have been told "Group 26" is an umbrella group and that the operations for the 26 members are ALL orchestrated out of Bristol. In December of 1993, my husband Gunther was made the head of DIS. We were preparing to move to Pax River, where the headquarters were being set up. Suddenly, I found myself involved in an international gold transfer . . . one that was said to be the largest ever made. I was told by Kurt Waldheim and his friend, an Austrian foreign minister, that Gunther and I were bringing home the Austrian treasury that Hitler had stolen in 1938. At the time I was staying in the bedroom Hitler shared with Eva Braun. The moment the transfer was complete, General Hugh (I knew him as Harry) Shelton called Gunther and told him he had been reactivated. I was furious that Gunther would walk back into the arms of people who had almost killed him. I left Europe and came back to California. The next thing I knew, Gunther . . . supposedly, was in prison for not paying his hotel bill. I waited two more years for him to be released . . . on the day of his release, he left me for Jane Ryder . . . his new wife. . . . I guess bigamy must be legal in England... because he never bothered to divorce me before he married her. Ms. Ryder's father is an old WWII M-I 6 officer. Gunther told me that she freelanced for the CIA, Vatican Intelligence and M-I 6. While she was in the U.S., she lived in the apartment of the famous Catholic priest-writer, Father Malachi Martin. Gunther told me that Father Martin was the head of Vatican Intelligence here in the United States. Jane's former lover, Allan Frankovich, died of a sudden heart attack while coming through customs in Houston carrying documentation proving that the CIA bombed PanAm 107. He died in March . . . Jane and Gunther moved in together in May or June. My first husband, the Navy Scientist who designed the nuclear warfare program for the Navy, as well as the electronic warfare program, also died of a sudden heart attack. My friend, Barbara Honnegger told me that her sources assured her my husband had been murdered. Were my husband and Allan murdered so Gunther could use the surviving mates for covert purposes? THE CONNECTION FROM THE OCTOBER SUPRISE TO DIANA's MURDER A Spanish newspaper was going to publish information stating that Diana's assassins belonged to a super secret intelligence unit based in Bristol, England. This intelligence unit is only know as "Group 26". When my huband Gunther was with the CIA, he and his team of SEALS were masters in murdering people USING automobile accidents. Do I have your attention? [2] If my husband wasn't part of the team that murdered Diana, he certainly knows who is, because leaks have come out that point the finger directly at him. Either he was part of the orchestrating of her death, or because he has been accused of killing her . . . he NOW knows who did. I should also add . . . Adnan Kashoggi, Dodi al Fayed' s uncle, is a friend of Gunther's. Adnan had loaned us his apartment in Vienna. I was on my way over when I found out Gunther had left me. Also, according to Gunther, the Ritz hotel in Paris played a part in the October Surprise. There are too many things that link Gunther to the al Fayad family, as well as this mysterious "Group 26", which investigators in Europe say orchestrated Diana's murder. What information do you have on this? On a different subject . . . The Secret Service seems to believe that Operation Mount Rushmore has been set in motion. That is the operation set in place by the Pegasus Group to murder the president . . . whoever it may be. Robert Hunt, a Navy SEAL who was part of my husband's group . . . also part of the team who tried to murder Gunther . . . is in jail in Oakland, being questioned by the Secret Service about what he knows about Operation Mount Rushmore. The only other member of Taskforce 151 and Pegasus . . . two of the most famous assassination teams . . . is Chip Tatum. I don't know if the Secret Service has him back in jail . . . but I bet they have tried to contact him to find out what he knows. It might be interesting if you did also. Hunt may have already been moved to FCI Pleasanton . . . in case you wanted to talk to him. If you find out anything about Gunther . . . I hope you will share it with me. *** DOCUMENTS DETAIL PLOT TO MURDER PRINCESS DIANA By Ru Mills (pseudonym) On April 22, 1998, 67 year old George Mearah was arrested in Vienna, Austria by the FBI, the CIA and the Austrian Security Police. The official reason for the arrest was the attempted extortion of millions of dollars from the father of Dodi Al Fayed. A statement from Harrods (owned by the father of Dodi Fayed) said: "The case follows a two week enquiry by Mr Macnamara, Harrod's Director of Security, in Washington and Vienna into allegations that British Intelligence sought the help of the CIA in a plot to assassinate Diana, Princess of Wales and Dodi Fayed." "Working with the full cooperation of law enforcement authorities in the United States and Austria, Mr. Macnamara was also investigating the alleged existence of documentary evidence of such a plot." "There are no further details at present as enquiries are continuing in the United States and further charges are anticipated." A quick reading of the short story, which was carried by AP, UPI and AOL UK, seemed to point to a bumbling attempt by an Austrian, living in the United States, to extort money from Mohammed Al Fayed, in exchange for classified intelligence documents purporting to show a conspiracy between British Intelligence and the CIA, to murder Princess Diana. An interesting statement made by the Kurier newspaper in Vienna said, "Mearah showed two documents at the Vienna meeting which had appeared genuine and proved Mr. Fayed's theory that the Establishment was trying to block Dodi from marrying Diana because he would become the step-father of a future king." A closer reading of the article raises many questions. The first being, if the documents are phony, then why are the FBI and the CIA involved? If extortion was taking place on Austrian soil, committed by a Austrian, who was targeting a European citizen, why are the United States intelligence and investigative agencies and bureaus involved? Which, if any, United States laws were broken? Upon rereading the article a third time, a veiled reference to where the documents came from was discovered, i.e., from inside the United States intelligence community. Could the purported extortionist have stolen these documents from one or the other of the United States intelligence units? And if he did, how could a bumbling outsider have accomplished this feat? If, indeed, the documents which Mr. Mearah was trying to sell to Mohammed Al Fayed were stolen from the United States intelligence agencies and bureaus, then the reason for the U.S. involvement becomes clear. From second and third hand reports, coming from unnamed sources in French Intelligence, the purloined documents appear to have originated with British Intelligence, (MI-6). The document appears to be seeking the cooperation of the CIA in the "neutralization" of Princess Diana, The story, as reported by the wire services, left a lot out. According to an unnamed French source, there is far more to the story than is being revealed. The French source believes that the whole operation is an attempt to "surface" documents which will expose the murder plot which was cooked up by British Intelligence. An investigative reporter, living in Northern California, confirms the French source and adds additional information. According to the California source, units from Naval Intelligence, Faction 2, appear to be involved. (Faction 2 is the nationalist, anti-New World Order network within the various intelligence agencies.) This piece of information confirms reports we have received regarding involvement by known members of Faction 2, such as Gunther Russbacher, Oswald LeWinter and others whose names cannot be named, but who have recently faded back into the shadow world, as if they have been called back to work, or as they say it in the game, "...gone operational." Faction 2, as noted, is a loosely woven group of intelligence operatives from many different countries who oppose a New World Order under the United Nations and the international bankers. Gunther Russbacher was the highest ranking intelligence operative and member of Faction 2 to ever break his cover and go public with the truth. His book, "The Fed and the Well Fed," was one of the first contemporary books to expose the connection between the Federal Reserve Bank and the nonprofit corporations which control the think thanks. These think tanks, such as the Ford Foundation, PBS, and Council on Foreign Relations, shape and mold every aspect of human life, opinion and thought in the United States. Soon, if their plan for Global Government is put in play, they will be able to influence the entire world. Russbacher tried to warn the people of the United States. For his attempt he was punished severely. Russbacher was imprisoned for six years for trying to wake up the American people. He was brutally beaten and tortured. He was subjected to unecessary open heart surgery, which was meant to kill him. His attorney, Paul Wilcher, was murdered for trying to expose the truth about Waco, the truth which he had received from Gunther Russbacher and Russbacher's Faction 2 SEAL team. Russbacher's wife, Rayelan was kidnaped, drugged, hypnotized, entrapped in a failed FBI sting operation, and had numerous attempts to kill or harm her. After six years of standing by her man through thick and thin, Gunther was released and Rayelan looked forward joyously to rejoining him. Within one day things had changed. Gunther went from loving his dearest wife with all his heart, to barely knowing who she was. Rayelan states he was subjected to intense mind control, or he was given a chemical such as scopolamine, which changes a person instantly. According to Rayelan, Gunther went crazy. He was no longer the man she loved. In truth, she barely recognized his voice. She felt he could have been replaced by a double. Rayelan later found out, from former FBI Director, William Sessions, with whom Russbacher had worked on counter terrorism, that her husband was traveling with Jane Ryder, a respected BBC film producer who was partnered, both romantically and business-wise, with the late, great documentary film producer, Allan Frankovich. Frankovich died suddenly, within weeks of the Russbacher-Ryder union. According to Sources within British Intelligence, Russbacher is running an international intelligence operation out of Bristol, England. (Gunther Russbacher denies this, and insists he is now retired.) Russbacher married Jane Ryder in December of 1997. His divorce from Rayelan will not be final until August of 1998. Russbacher was born in Austria, on July 1, of either 1939, 1942, 1944 or 1946. His wife has seen all four birth certificates. He was born on a red marble altar, in the crypt of a small church outside of Salzburg, Austria. The dome shaped crypt where he was born contains the bodies of all the Knights Templar Grand Masters. Russbacher was born in some kind of templar ritual. In August of 1994, on his fifth wedding ceremony, Russbacher took his wife, Rayelan, to this church and remarried her, kneeling at the base of the 1000 year old altar, in a Templar ceremony. When the ceremony was over he said, "I did this so that no man will ever be able to separate us." Shortly after the Death of Diana, a Spanish newspaper began implicating Russbacher and the Bristol Intelligence unit in the death of Diana. Some unusual coincidences were shared by Russbacher and Diana. Russbacher was born on July 1st. Diana was born on his birthday. She died on August 31, his 8th wedding anniversary to Rayelan. When confronted with the possibility of her husband being the murderer of Princess Diana, Rayelan replied, "It is technically possible. My husband's team specialized in killing people in unusual ways, like automobile accidents." Rayelan further stated that she did not know if the man who was living in Bristol and was married to Jane Ryder was the same one that she was/is married to. Rayelan knows for a fact that there are two Gunther K. Russbachers who are approximately the same age. She believes Jane could be married to the real one, whose mind has been altered through drugs and hypnosis. Or she has been taken in by the phony one who is trying to tred on Gunther's reputation. Rayelan says that it is possible British Intelligence kidnapped Gunther Russbacher, did a mind drain and reinserted all the information into the double. She further stated that Gunther's new father-in-law is an MI-6 agent, and has been for over 40 years, maybe longer. With the electronic machines developed by NSA, thought transference is not impossible. When Rayelan was in Salzburg at a secret Templar lodge used by the Hapsburgs for secret meetings, she was told that the Hapsburgs have been cloning themselves for over a hundred years. Since Gunther Russbacher is one of the highest ranking Hapsburgs, naturally he would have clones prepared for him. A few days ago, an investigator from the Midwest called Russbacher at his Bristol number to inquire about the arrest in Vienna of a purported member of Russbacher's team. Russbacher screamed hysterically, "I can't talk to you people. You're all terrorists." He slammed down the phone. When Rayelan was reached for a comment she stated, "The Gunther Russbacher I was married to would never act like that. He was the essence of calm, cool and collected. He was James Bond incarnate, even when he was drunk." Rodney Stich, the author of *Defrauding America*, added a new twist to this strange puzzle when he said that Gunther Russbacher had called him in a panic. Russbacher stated that the other Gunther Russbacher was trying to shake down Mohammed Al Fayed so they had to kill him. It appeared, according to the Russbacher who was still alive, that the dead Russbacher had somehow stumbled into an operation which was being orchestrated by Adnan Khashoggi, and he presented himself as the CIA/ONI operative Gunther Russbacher for the purposes of authenticating the documents. He was killed because someone discovered he was the fake Russbacher. Rayelan Russbacher filled in a little more of the puzzle when she explained that her husband Gunther and Adnan were old friends. They were both arms dealers during the early 80's, and according to Khashoggi, Robert Walker, one of Russbacher's CIA aliases, was responsible for Khashoggi's enormous wealth. Rayelan also reminded us that Khashoggi was involved with Imelda Marcos in a spectacular trial in NYC involving gold and intrigue. Khashoggi stated that all he did was provide transportation for moving the gold. Gerry Spence, the famous lawyer for Randy Weaver, represented Imelda Marcos and won the case. Russbacher and his wife were also involved in moving gold from the Phillippines. Russbacher told his wife that he was entrusted with moving the Austrian Treasury from where it was hidden in the Phillippines, back to Austria. Rayelan was told that the gold was the gold that Hitler had stolen from Austria in 1939. She said that while they were to be in Vienna completing the gold deal, that Adnan had loaned them his apartment in Vienna. Khashoggi's involvement in this current arrest in Vienna for purloined classified documents should be obvious. According to sources in French Intelligence, the documents were stolen from the FBI shadow unit number 5. This is the FBI's counter terrorism unit. This is the unit for which Gunther Russbacher worked under the supervision of William Sessions and Rudolph Guiliani. Khashoggi, a long time CIA asset, worked with FBI Section 5 providing them information on groups to which he had supplied weapons. Through this association with the FBI, Section 5, Khashoggi made many friends. Some of these friends joined with Khashoggi in his current operation which is code named "Submarine". (A source from Europe supplied the real name of the operation. It was named after a submarine that was known for its difficulty in surfacing. I failed to write down the name of the submarine, and so for purposes of this article, I have renamed it "Operation Submarine.") According to a researcher out of Chicago, with sources in intelligence throughout Europe, the man, George Mearah, is actually Oswald Le Winter. Le winter is one of those shadowy covert types who just happen to pop up in unexpected places with unexpected information. In the mid eighties he was known as Razin, the informant who fed Barbara Honneger misinformation regarding October Surprise. Russbacher was also associated with the October Surprise, as was Adnan Khashoggi. Le Winter also was privy to the O.K.C. bombing. One week before the bombing, Le Winter told a NYC columnist that a terrorist attack was going to take place on April 19th. On April 17th, 1995, Rayelan Russbacher received a call from her husband. He told her that all out war had broken out. He advised her to be very careful what she said in the next few days. Both Russbacher and Le Winter had inside information, probably from the same source. Le Winter has the reputation of being a CIA disinformation specialist. He would be the perfect operative to use in "Operations Submarine". Just as submarines have to surface, "Operation Submarine" is all about surfacing documents that were buried so deep no one ever thought they would see the light of day. According to the article about the extortion of Mohammed Al Fayed, the subject was arrested by the FBI and Austrian Police. An Austrian newspaper was given copies of the documents. The documents purport to show that British Intelligence tried to enlist the CIA in the murder of Diana. The CIA flatly denies any involvement in her murder. And Rayelan Russbacher believes their denial. The CIA is now in possession of documents which state that British Intelligence had been ordered by someone to "neutralize" Diana. If the United States intelligence units wanted the truth about the murder of Diana and Dodi to finally be known, "Operation Submarine", orchestrated by Dodi Fayed's loving Uncle Adnan Khashoggi, would be the perfect vehicle. Khashoggi, Le Winter and Russbacher go way back. The only question that remains is: Which Gunther Russbacher is dead? The real one, or the double? And if the real one has died, which "wife" will inherit his billion dollar commission from the Austrian/Phillippines gold deal. Maybe if Rayelan Russbacher is lucky, Adnan Khashoggi will let her know if she is a wealthy widow; or just another "old wife" who was dumped for a younger model.

by **sunny** » Fri Mar 03, 2006 9:42 pm

anti, so what does this mean? I thought the Queen wholeheartedly approved of Camilla. Is there a split with Charles? this may be gross, but I think Charles is gay and Camilla is his substitute man, since he can't openly have the real thing.Does the Queen know this? Has this been said before? I'm a little late to this game! Starman-WOW! thanks for that wealth of information. As I said above, I'm a little late to this game- I wasn't online in '97, and life ensued thereafter, so I didn't get as deeply into the murder of Diana as I would have liked. You have given me plenty of resources to keep me busy for a while.

by **slimmouse** » Fri Mar 03, 2006 9:50 pm

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>The first being, if the documents are phony, then why are the FBI and the CIA involved? <hr></blockquote> In a recent Daytime programme, Annie Machon, partner of Whistleblower David Shayler said that the thing that first attracted her and her partners attention to the probability that Princess Diana WAS murdered, were these "clear forgeries" - to paraphrase her, because they smacked so clearly to both of them as a prointel false flag.

by **antiaristo** » Fri Mar 03, 2006 10:45 pm

"My husband is planning ‘an accident’ in my car, brake failure and serious head injury in order to make the path clear for Charles to marry." She knew. She knew she was to be murdered. She knew how they were going to do it. She knew who was behind it. She knew why she was to be killed. What's so difficult? Is there some reason for believing somebody else, other than the victim? Is there some reason for believing a rationale put forward after the event? Unless somebody can answer these questions, I suggest we accept her word, as passed on to her "rock", in the form of a hand written letter that is now in the hands of the coroner. Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=antiaristo>antiaristo</A> at: 3/3/06 7:47 pm

by **StarmanSkye** » Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:16 am

Uhm, you're suggesting what, exactly? Since there's a note alleged to be written by Diana before her death, the murder can be considered 'solved'? So, Charles acted alone in 'planning' her death, he also tampered with the brakes of a back-up car belonging to the Hotel owned by Dodi's dad, thereby causing her death by head-injury? QED? It wasn't her car. Proximate and primary cause of accident was not brake failure. Diana died of blood-loss due to a ruptured major heart vessel. Diana's note at best indicates motive as SHE understood it. The note doesn't even begin to explain the intricate details of how the accident was precisely caused and who was on-scene to carry-it-out, the manner of how her death was insured and by who (replacement ambulance medics?), whether and to what extent there were additional reasons for her murder, who covered-up and hid the accident and murder details, how the false cover-story of the patsy chauffer was played and by-who, who put the second back-up 'reason' in play to innoculate Charles against charges that Diana was his primary target, who was involved and how did they throw the Paris investigation, and etc. and etc. I can't believe you asked 'what's so difficult?' Does this mean you think 'Diana's' note explains everything? If so, then more might be learned by asking why most people apparently don't concur, since the actual difficulty of understanding and explaining this very sophisticated murder conspiracy is already pretty clear, ie., assembling a comprehensive and compelling evidence trail that PROVES beyond reasonable doubt how motive, means and opportunity implicates those involved. Just because Diana thought she knew that Charles intended her dead ONLY so he could marry Camilla, doesn't even come close to meeting the burden of law. In that Charles and the House of Windsor are essentially above and beyond the law, about the only recourse to Justice for those who believe Truth matters and want to do right by Diana's life and memory is the Court of Public Opinion -- By identifying the role played by conspiracy members and bringing pressure to bear on whistleblowers, the British public cannot help but realize the true repugnant nature of Charles and the House of Windsor, and the inordinate privelege and power special interests had who were negatively-affected by Diana's life (and so had motivation to contribute resources and participate in the conspiracy), and the reprehensive, criminal character of the State Secrets Act, Special Services and covert op agents who were involved in the accident/murder of 3 people for the sake of an egregious abuse of Royal privelege. By 'resting the people's case' as it were on Diana's alleged note, I don't think ANYTHING will really change, those involved will escape justice, and the public will have wasted a prime opportunity to show their appreciation and love and respect for Diana by pursuing the full truth of her death at the hands of a foul, corrupt aristocracy that has nothing but contempt for the public and the rule of law. Starman

by **antiaristo** » Sat Mar 04, 2006 9:25 am

Starman, Motivation is everything in this case. I'm not minimizing your research. Far from it. I appreciate what I cannot do myself. But in this case MOTIVATION is everything. Why? I've said this so many times. I get belittled; I get sneered at by those that cannot understand. THE TREASON FELONY ACT. Diana said to clear the path for Charles to marry. What difference does it make? If he's single, there would be a king on the Throne. If he's married there would be a king AND A QUEEN on the Throne. Now read what the Treason Felony Act says. "our Most Gracious Lady the Queen" It says NOTHING about the King. Nothing. Which means if there is no queen, then the Treason Felony Act IS INACTIVE. Diana knew this. She knew her husband would try to kill her "in order to clear the path for Charles to marry." She knew the importance. THE MOTIVATION IS THE TREASON FELONY ACT.

The Diana Files - Modified Limited Hangout

Laws and Pantomimes

Peter Levene - Lloyds of London and Iran - Contra

French Judgement Reversed

Henri Paul a secret agent

Re: Henri Paul a secret agent

Re: Henri Paul a secret agent

Re: Henri Paul a secret agent

Cross Post From The Future King Arthur

Saving the Monarchy by Skipping a Generation?

Re: Henri Paul a secret agent

Diana

Re: Henri Paul a secret agent

Diana Knew

What Diana Thought She Knew vs What Really Happened

Re: What Diana Thought She Knew vs What Really Happened

Who is online