Pollution makes for more girls

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Pollution makes for more girls

Postby nomo » Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:20 pm

Published online: 21 October 2005<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.nature.com/news/2005/051017/full/051017-16.html">www.nature.com/news/2005/...17-16.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Pollution makes for more girls<br>The stress of dirty air skews sex ratios in Sao Paulo.<br><br>Erika Check<br><br>Toxic fumes favour the fairer sex, a group of researchers in Brazil has found.<br><br>Jorge Hallak and his team at the University of Sao Paulo turned up the surprising result by studying babies born in their city. They divided the metropolis of 17 million people into areas of low, medium and high air pollution, using test results from air-quality monitoring stations. They then studied birth registries of children born from 2001 to 2003.<br><br>The team found that 48.3% of babies were female in the least polluted areas, but 49.3% were female in the dirtiest parts of town. After measuring the ratio of boys to girls born in all the areas, they calculated that 1,180 more babies would have been boys in the polluted areas if they had the same sex ratios as the cleaner areas. The team reported their findings on 17 October at the American Society for Reproductive Medicine meeting in Montreal.<br><br>It has been known for the past 60 years that, for humans, the ratio of males to females in newborns usually tips towards sons. Scientists are not really sure why this occurs, but certain conditions, such as those after the Second World War, have been found to alter this balance.<br><br>Researchers who were at the meeting say Hallak's study raises intriguing questions about the health effects of air pollution, but caution that more rigorous, large studies will be needed to confirm the finding. "I think it's a fascinating and serious problem," says Anthony Thomas, a urologist who heads the male infertility section of the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio. "But this is just a beginning, and now they need to do more work to examine this carefully."<br><br>Safe strategy<br><br>Hallak believes his findings suggest that pollution is a reproductive stress similar to others that skew sex ratios. Research shows that natural disasters and crises such as terrorist attacks can increase the probability that a newborn is female. This is thought to be the safer reproductive bet, as girls are likely to grow up and have a few children of their own. Boys are a more risky venture: they could father dozens of children, or none at all.<br><br>"It looks as if the human race is trying to repopulate itself, and of course females are important for that," Hallak says.<br><br>Thomas points out that the Sao Paulo researchers did not identify which components of the polluted air were skewing the sex ratio, so they cannot say for sure that the pollution itself caused the effect. It is possible, for example, that more polluted areas were also poorer, and that economic differences were the actual causal factor.<br>        <br>But Hallak says that his team has found preliminary evidence that pollution exerts its effect by targeting sperm, altering the proportion that carry an X or Y chromosome. The researchers found that if they exposed male mice to pollution, then the males' mates gave birth to more females than expected. Pollution also reduced total sperm counts in the mice, Hallak says.<br><br>The weaker sex<br><br>It is still not clear why pollution would skew the sex ratio. Other researchers have found that chemicals, such as soil disinfectants, can have a short-term effect on sex ratios in children born to workers who handle the chemicals. Chemicals can also hurt sperm quality and sperm count.<br><br>Such findings have led some scientists to speculate that Y-chromosome sperm, which will produce boys, are weaker than X-chromosome sperm, and therefore more susceptible to environmental stresses. But that has not actually been proven, Thomas says.<br><br>Nevertheless, the study adds another concern to the list of pollution's adverse effects on health. If the finding is solid, it may have implications for sex ratios in huge cities such as Jakarta and Beijing, where air quality is notoriously poor (see 'Satellite view alerts China to soaring pollution').<br><br>"It's an initial study that has interest, and I think the city and state of Sao Paulo need to look at this more carefully," says Thomas.<br> <p>--<br>When all else fails... panic.</p><i></i>
User avatar
nomo
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:48 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Pollution makes for more girls

Postby thumperton » Mon Oct 24, 2005 7:59 pm

Don't forget also how soy products excess estrogen in both men and women. <p></p><i></i>
thumperton
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

toxic stew

Postby * » Mon Oct 24, 2005 8:47 pm

<!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7440">Gender Bending Chemicals Found to 'Feminise' Boys</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>“Gender-bendingâ€
*
 
Posts: 315
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 9:48 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

so...

Postby Homeless Halo » Mon Oct 24, 2005 8:59 pm

Should I be glad I live in a badly polluted city, then? <p></p><i></i>
Homeless Halo
 
Posts: 564
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 1:51 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Yup, the xenoestrogens....

Postby banned » Tue Oct 25, 2005 12:54 am

...not to mention the plain old hormones in our environment not only cause cancer, but they feminize boys, masculinize women (take a look at the typical young female figure now--small hips, long waist: boyish) and cause early puberty and low sperm counts.<br><br>If you think San Francisco where men are women and women are men and the something in the air that keeps women from getting pregnant is men's legs is the ideal society, that's where we're headed. Don't get me wrong, I'm not homo- or transphobic in the least (some of my friends are gay, trans, or gay AND trans), but the world has enough social problems without the addition of the hormonal disruption.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
banned
 
Posts: 912
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 5:18 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Yup, the xenoestrogens....

Postby thumperton » Tue Oct 25, 2005 4:42 am

I wonder if hormones can account for height increase as well? <p></p><i></i>
thumperton
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to Environment

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests