Pollutants Responsible for Gap in Gender Ratio?

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Pollutants Responsible for Gap in Gender Ratio?

Postby chiggerbit » Sun Dec 18, 2005 2:09 am

Many years ago I lived in a small town in the Michigan UP, on the shore of Lake Michigan. In the couple of years I lived there, I got to know two families that had girls born with genital abnormalities--one girl had been born with genitalia of both genders, and one had been born with no genitalia at all. I always wondered about those odds, two children of about the same age out of no more than three or four dozen families I got to know in that area. <br><br>Now this article ponders the possibility that pollutants on an Indian reservation on the Canadian side of the Great Lakes are causing a significant gap in the male-female gender ratios of infants born to the tribe since the early 1990's.<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.timesdaily.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051217/API/512170793&cachetime=5Article">www.timesdaily.com/apps/p...e=5Article</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> published Dec 17, 2005<br><br>Pollution on Canada Reservation Is Probed<br><br> <br>See link for entire article.<br>By MATT CRENSON<br><br>AP National Writer<br><br> <br><br>Growing up with smokestacks on the horizon, Ada Lockridge never thought much about the pollution that came out of them.<br><br> She never worried about the oil slicks in Talfourd Creek, the acrid odors that wafted in on the shifting winds or even the air-raid siren behind her house whose shrill wail meant "go inside and shut the windows."<br><br> Now Lockridge worries all the time.<br><br> A budding environmental activist, she recently made a simple but shocking discovery: There are two girls born in her small community for every boy. A sex ratio so out of whack, say scientific experts who helped her reveal the imbalance, almost certainly indicates serious environmental contamination by one or more harmful chemicals.<br><br> The question: Which ones? And another, even more pressing question: What else are these pollutants doing to the 850 members of this Chippewa community?<br><br> Lockridge and her neighbors live just across the U.S.-Canada border from Port Huron, Mich., on the Aamjiwnaang First Nation Reserve. For nearly half a century, their land has been almost completely surrounded by Canada's largest concentration of petrochemical manufacturing.<br><br> Much of their original reserve, founded in 1827, was sold out from under them via questionable land deals in the 1960s. It is now occupied by pipelines, factories and row upon row of petroleum storage tanks.<br><br> The area is so dominated by the industry that it is referred to on maps and in local parlance as "Chemical Valley."<br><br> About two years ago, Suncor Energy - which already operates a refinery and petrochemical plant next to the Aamjiwnaang reserve - proposed adding another factory to the mix, an ethanol plant to be built on one of the few undeveloped parcels adjoining the community's property.<br><br> Lockridge and other members of the band joined to oppose the plant. They asked biologist Michael Gilbertson to look at a binder full of technical information about air, water and soil contamination on the reserve.<br><br> In a conference call, he reported that the data showed elevated levels of dioxin, PCBs, pesticides and heavy metals including arsenic, cadmium, lead and mercury.<br><br> Almost as an afterthought, he asked a question: Had anybody noticed a difference in the number of girls and boys in the community?<br><br> At the other end of the line, the Aamjiwnaang and their allies were suddenly abuzz.<br><br> "All of a sudden everybody in that room started talking," said Margaret Keith, a staffer for the Occupational Health Clinic for Ontario Workers, a public health agency.<br><br> Somebody pointed out that the reserve had fielded three girls' baseball teams in a recent year and only one boys' team. Lockridge thought about herself and her two sisters, with eight daughters among them and only one son.<br><br> The question was not as offhand as it seemed. "I had been interested in sex ratio as an indicator - a very sensitive indicator of effects going on as a result of exposure to chemicals," Gilbertson said in a recent interview.<br><br> Gilbertson explained that certain pollutants, including many found on the Aamjiwnaang reserve, could interfere with the sex ratio of newborns in a population. Heavy metals have been shown to affect sex ratio by causing the miscarriage of male fetuses. Other pollutants known as endocrine disrupters - including dioxin and PCBs - can wreak all sorts of havoc by interfering with the hormones that determine whether a couple will have a boy or a girl.<br><br> If some pollutant was skewing the distribution of girls and boys in her family and her community, Ada Lockridge thought, what else could it be doing?<br><br> Statistics indicate that one in four Aamjiwnaang children has behavioral or learning disabilities, and that they suffer from asthma at nearly three times the national rate. Four of 10 women on the reserve have had at least one miscarriage or stillbirth.<br><br> "I was throwing up thinking about what was in me," said Lockridge, who is 42. "I cried. And then I got angry."<br><br> She got a copy of the band membership list, and tallied the number of boys and girls born in each year since 1984. Sure enough, the percentage of boys started dropping below 50 percent around 1993. It is now approaching 30 percent, with no sign of leveling off.<br><br> The finding was significant enough to warrant a paper in Environmental Health Perspectives, a well-regarded scientific journal. Lockridge, who has worked as a home health aide and carpenter's assistant, was listed as an author.....<br><br><br><br>... Lockridge's discovery of a sudden shift in sex ratio suggests a new pollutant came into the Aamjiwnaang's environment during the early 1990s. And the fact that the decrease is continuing suggests that whatever that pollutant is, it is still around.<br><br> So far, nobody recalls anything new coming on the scene during the early '90s. And the levels of likely suspects such as PCBs and mercury have actually decreased in the past decade.<br><br> The sex ratio of newborn babies is normally within a hair's breadth of 50-50, with slightly more boys born than girls. There are very few documented cases of an imbalance as extreme as the one of the Aamjiwnaang reserve.<br><br> During the late 1950s, a severe outbreak of mercury poisoning in Minamata, Japan, caused a decrease in the percentage of male births. Mercury and other heavy metals cause the preferential miscarriage of male fetuses simply because their brains are more vulnerable during development compared to those of females.<br><br> Mercury is unlikely to be causing the shortage of boys on the Aamjiwnaang reserve, however. Though levels of the metal are elevated on the reserve, the Aamjiwnaang are exposed to much less mercury today than they were 50 years ago. Back then, poor band members would go to open toxic waste dumps and extract mercury from the soil by adding water to it, then sell the metal on the black market.<br><br> The Aamjiwnaang and their scientific advisers believe it is more likely that endocrine disrupters are to blame. Dozens of synthetic organic chemicals can interfere with natural hormones by either interfering with or amplifying their effects. Because hormones are so important to the development and healthy performance of the body's organs, endocrine disrupters have the potential to cause a wide range of effects, from damage to the brain and sex organs in utero to decreased sperm production and immune suppression in adults. It is even arguable that they could influence sexual behavior and violence.<br><br> In her book "Our Stolen Future," biologist Theo Colborne worries that endocrine disrupters may be responsible for "physical, mental and behavioral disruption in humans that could affect fertility, learning ability, aggression and conceivably even parenting and mating behavior."<br><br> Some researchers have suggested that endocrine disrupters may be responsible for numerous alarming trends - rising rates of testicular and breast cancer, a higher frequency of reproductive tract abnormalities, declining sperm counts and increases in learning disabilities among them.<br><br> In 1976, a dioxin release at a factory in Seveso, Italy, sickened at least 2,000 people. Years later, scientists found that men who were exposed to the highest dioxin levels were more likely to have daughters than sons. Among men who were younger than 19 years old at the time of the accident, the ratio was the same as it is today on the Aamjiwnaang reserve - two-to-one.<br><br> At lower doses, the effects of endocrine disrupting chemicals are subtle and have been harder to document.<br><br> "Not a lot is known, actually," said Marc Weisskopf, a research associate at the Harvard School of Public Health.<br><br> In a 2003 study, he and several colleagues found that mothers who consumed large amounts of PCB-contaminated fish caught in the Great Lakes were more likely to have girls.....<br><br><br><br> .....There is little doubt that endocrine-disrupting pollutants are affecting the sexual development of wildlife right where the Aamjiwnaang live. In Lake St. Clair, not 30 miles from their reserve, fish are swimming around with both male and female gonads. The condition, known as intersex, is caused when a young fish that is genetically male is exposed to chemicals such as the fertilizer atrazine, which causes female gonads to develop by acting like the hormone estrogen.<br><br> The phenomenon has been documented all over the southern Great Lakes - not just in fish, but in birds and amphibians as well.....<br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

These 'endocrine disruptors'...

Postby banned » Sun Dec 18, 2005 2:31 am

...are responsible for everything from low sperm counts in men to increasing breast cancer rates in women. And while it's unPC to say so, the increasing numbers of 'transgenders'--people who feel their brain is one sex and their body another--may also be part of the same phenomenon, since research has shown that the hormones a fetus is exposed to during crucial phases of development can influence gender behavior. Who knows, maybe even increased rates of homosexuality derive from the same phenomenon (oddly, the rightwing and the progressive gay community may both resist that conclusion, the righties beecause they are invested in 'homosexuality is a choice', the gays because it's hard to say 'gay is great' if it turns out to be damage due to chemical pollution.<br><br>I have even noticed another phenomenon: boys are girlier, girls are more masculine. Look at the male movie stars in their 40s several decades ago, now look at them now--the Johnny Depps, the Brad Pitts are still pretty BOYS. And look at the female body type--it's not just anorexia, young girls have broad shoulders, long waists, thin hips. That's bone structure. <br><br>Since the end of WWII, the chemicals that have been introduced into the environment and invaded our bodies, whether we're talking about chemicals like pesticides, or plastics (which were invented around 1950), or the hormones in meat and milk, have made all of us into unwitting guinea pigs on a scale unknown in history. By the time I was 45 I had lost several friends to cancer and had it myself. Baby boomers are dropping dead before they ever hit 60 (could be we won't have to worry about my generation bankrupting Social Security after all.) Just check the obituaries, you see people dying in their 80s and 90s, and then you see people in their 40s and 50s. A lot of them, and of diseases, not accidents. My parents in their 50s were in their prime, healthy and vital. My 50ish friends are constantly telling me they've been diagnosed with hypertension, coronary artery disease, diabetes--they're in the shape my parents' generation (who were actually old enough to be my grandparents, I was born late) began to be in in their 70s (my dad retired, reluctantly, at 73.)<br><br>The chemical companies who have poisoned our bodies not only will never pay for this, we will pay THEM, because companies like DuPont and AstraZeneca not only make the pollutants, they make the expensive chemotherapy drugs given to people who get get cancer from them. <p></p><i></i>
banned
 
Posts: 912
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 5:18 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

PS re: Michigan...

Postby banned » Sun Dec 18, 2005 2:37 am

....I lived for a year, 1987-88, in an area of MI with a lot of small lakes that reportedly had been polluted by Hooker Chemical (whom you'll remember from Love Canal.)<br><br>Besides myself, I knew two people who lived near me in their early 40s who were diagnosed with cancer; both died of virulent cancers, one colon, one pancreas, and I was given 6 months to a year to live. The other 2 were men who spent a lot of time fishing and swimming in those lakes. Both were 'outdoorsmen' and appeared, until they got suddenly ill, to be the picture of health.<br><br>I would be interested in knowing the cancer statistics for that area. Not that the statistics can't be massaged, or explained away (as they are always trying to for the 'cancer cluster' here in the SF Bay Area, as if the oil refineries in the East Bay, computer industry leavings in the South Bay, dioxin dump in the North Bay, plus years of pesticides when the area was mostly agricultural, aren't obvious enough causes.) <p></p><i></i>
banned
 
Posts: 912
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 5:18 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: PS re: Michigan...

Postby chiggerbit » Sun Dec 18, 2005 3:46 am

Did you know that the gender of turtles is determined by the temperature at which the eggs are buried? Those turtle eggs which are buried at the "in-between" temperature which produces a 50/50 ratio have the lowest survival rate after hatching. Interesting article on sex determination:<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://bio.research.ucsc.edu/~barrylab/classes/animal_behavior/SEX_DEVO.HTM">bio.research.ucsc.edu/~ba...X_DEVO.HTM</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=chiggerbit@rigorousintuition>chiggerbit</A> at: 12/18/05 1:05 am<br></i>
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

PBS 2003

Postby * » Sun Dec 18, 2005 1:16 pm

<br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.pbs.org/odyssey/odyssey/20030822_log_transcript.html">Pesticides Could Become The Ultimate Male Contraceptive</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br> catchy title, eh?<br><br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>
*
 
Posts: 315
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 9:48 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: PBS 2003

Postby chiggerbit » Sun Dec 18, 2005 3:09 pm

I read a book once, can't remember the name, fiction, which was about the human race all over the world becoming sterile, and about to become extinct. I'll have to dig it up again. It would make a great movie. <p></p><i></i>
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to Environment

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests