Psyops season: Pro-war, pro-Obama. Same thing.

[Byrne]

As a one-time Hugh disbeliever turned convert, I would like to take this chance to say I like Hugh's posts. Yes, sometimes he hijacks other threads, and sometimes I do find myself wondering about the credibility of the connections he makes, but for the most part, I can see at least some validity to his points. I don't agree with every post, but they have opened my mind quite a bit. So, for anyone new to the RI board and unfamiliar with Hugh's theses, it may take them some time to come around to the realization that Hugh is frequently correct. Keep posting.

I must say that I do appreciate Hugh's posts also. Sometimes the connections that Hugh postulates seem incredulous
(hmm, but that's something to do with how Psyops works, I'm sure)
but he'll admit his limits/mistakes when he sees 'em and/or try to provide further explanation when asked (despite provocations).

Keep on postin' Shuggie!

[Joe Hillshoist]

Hugh, I'm still confused, however

A)

Cloverfield the movie is meant to be a distraction from "Cloverdale" the school. Supposed mailing address of the Anthrax letter Tom Dascele recieved.

As is the reference to Cloverdale Mass in the movie Deck the Halls.

Sounds kooky.

Cept for the fact that since that movie Cloverfield came out, and ever since, I have been getting Cloverfield and Cloverdale confused in odd ways in my mind, and had actually thought about how funny it was a few weeks ago. Long before I saw this post.

B)

That youtube movie Cloverdale has nothing to do with this, when I first read this post i thought you were also referring to a movie called Cloverdale, and I'd never heard of one so I went looking for it.

Sorry about the confusion. (Caused by, funnily enough, the same interchangability of Cloverdale and Cloverfield that your claims in this thread hang on.)

Thats trippy.

[Joe Hillshoist]

Oh yeah - Hugh still confused but if A) above is basically what you were saying.

IF so fair enough, tho it seems kind of counter intuitive.

And B) above kind of confirms it at least in my case. It was one of those funny coincidences.

So at least some of what you are saying is fair enough. And I'm no longer confused about it.

I don't agree with every example you make, but obviously the sort of confusion I experienced above shows how the general principle can be of use.

[esotericmetal]

Hugh, one thing baffles me (well, lots of things baffle me, but mainly one in your voluminous output on this board): seeing as this is a place for people who generally already HAVE accepted the fact that people are constantly manipulated by the media, the movies etc., why on Earth do you insist on continuously giving us these "revelations" of what you perceive as individual, extremely intricate (dare I say implausible) "psyops" meme implanting schemes? What possible use is it, seeing as people on this board (as far as I can see it) already accept your general premise, if disagreeing vehemently on the details?

Why are you here at all if you've accepted this general premise and don't want to go further into the details? It's all in the details. Why would you be on a discussion board if not to further your understanding of certain subjects and get varying opinions? Would you rather everyone hear agree with each other? While i definitely don't see a lot of what Hugh has to say is 'correct' (and sometimes just plain crazy), it's people like him that i find this forum so invaluable. I'm not here to reaffirm what my views are, but to constantly challenge them. The more examples the better.

I can remember when i friend of mine told me that '"9/11 was an inside job", and i said to him "you are fucking crazy".

(i still don't think 9/11 was an 'inside job', but a 'globalist job' like others have come to realize, but you get my point)

[Penguin]

Via Cryptogon:

http://cryptogon.com/?p=6057 ,video

"Kissinger on Obama: “A New World Order Can Be Created”"

[MinM]

The supermarket and drug store magazine racks are loaded with testosterone and Obama adulation.

Esquire- Clint Eastwood in a black shirt on a black cover. Dirty Harry in Blackwater. Male = survival.
GQ- Jennifor Anniston stark naked. Female = vulnerability.

Whenever the USG gears up for a violence surge, the CIA media goes all testosterone on us to show how useless female compassion is so we'll embrace male warrior culture.

Same thing happened before the invasion of Panama in '89, for instance.

Look out for recruiting cues leading up to Obama's inauguration.
Especially movies. Last year it was the 'Cloverdale' monster movie for two weekends before the mis-Statement of the Union Address by W.

Cuz we're going into a war surge! Prepare for Afghanistan success stories brought to you by lots of bombing and lots of "collateral damage."

Love the puff magazine portraying Obama as the realization of Martin Luther King's dream. Guess it doesn't really matter that blacks still can't vote, Katrina left- behind mass death, institutionalized poverty, prison-industrial complex, etc.

Psyops hyper-ventilation. As predictable as plumbing.

Nobel winners press NBC to cancel Wesley Clark’s war-based ‘reality’ show

By Stephen C. Webster
Monday, August 13, 2012 15:01 EDT

Nine Nobel Peace prize winners said Monday that NBC must “immediately” drop a planned “reality” show called “Stars Earn Stripes,” where former four-star general and one-time Democratic presidential candidate Wesley Clark sends celebrities on military-style training “missions” to entertain viewers.

Signers of an open letter to the network include Nobelists Desmond Tutu, Dr. Shirin Ebadi, Adolfo Perez Esquivel, Jose Ramos-Horta, Jody Williams, Mairead Maguire, Oscar Arias Sanchez, Rigoberta Menchu and Betty Williams.

“That might seem innocuous since spectacular, high budget sporting events of all types are regular venues for airing new products, televisions shows and movies,” the Nobelists’ letter explains. “But ‘Stars Earn Stripes’ is not just another reality show. Hosted by retired four-star general Wesley Clark, the program pairs minor celebrities with US military personnel and puts them through simulated military training, including some live fire drills and helicopter drops. The official NBC website for the show touts ‘the fast-paced competition’ as ‘pay[ing] homage to the men and women who serve in the U.S. Armed Forces and our first-responder services.’

“It is our belief that this program pays homage to no one anywhere and continues and expands on an inglorious tradition of glorifying war and armed violence. Military training is not to be compared, subtly or otherwise, with athletic competition by showing commercials throughout the Olympics. Preparing for war is neither amusing nor entertaining.”

The Nobel Women’s Initiative added that the group is supporting a protest in New York City on Monday night at 5 p.m. outside the NBC building in Rockefeller Plaza.

“The long history of collaboration between militaries and civilian media and entertainment—and not just in the United States—appears to be getting murkier and in many ways more threatening to efforts to resolve our common problems through nonviolent means,” they wrote. “Active-duty soldiers already perform in Hollywood movies, “embedded” media ride with soldier in combat situations, and now NBC is working with the military to attempt to turn deadly military training into a sanitized ‘reality’ TV show that reveals absolutely nothing of the reality of being a soldier in war or the consequences of war. What is next?”

Their full letter follows below the video...

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/08/13/n ... lity-show/

[MinM]

Unblinking surveillance stare: Army's 7-story flying football field-sized blimp
The U.S. Army has a 7-story flying football field-sized blimp with a 21-day unblinking surveillance stare. The LEMV, described as a "Revolutionary ISR Weapon System" completed a successful 90-minute test flight directly over New Jersey where the fiery Hindenburg disaster happened.
By Ms. Smith on Mon, 08/13/12 - 8:06pm.

When you think about high-tech "intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance" (ISR) breakthroughs, does a gigantic $172 million blimp immediately come to mind? If not, then join the club. In fact my first thought when learning about the U.S. Army's new blimp was Hindenburg.

It's not fashionable to call this flying spy (hybrid military airship) a "blimp," but a Long Endurance Multi-Intelligence Vehicle (LEMV). You are no doubt familiar with the Goodyear blimp that hovers over football games, but the LEMV is almost the size of a seven-story flying football field; it's meant to fly at speeds between 30 and 80 knots without ceasing for 21 straight days while providing an "unblinking" eye of surveillance.

Northrop Grumman has a $517 million contract to build three of these 21st-century robotic airships for the U.S. Army. The first of three had a successful 90-minute test flight last week from the Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst in New Jersey. This first test flight included two pilots, but the Army intends for the LEMV to be like the Predator, an unmanned flying surveillance machine. Both Northrop Grumman and the Army must like the term "unblinking," as it was used several times to describe the "Revolutionary ISR Weapon System" aka the LEMV...

http://www.networkworld.com/community/b ... ized-blimp

If you prefer something a little more stealthy.

[Luther Blissett]

That could account for the floating black triangle I saw two years ago.

[Wombaticus Rex]

Yeah. So could Boeing Skunk Works anti-gravity technology.