Arctic Updates

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Postby Ben D » Sun Feb 15, 2009 7:18 pm

BBC News wrote:Global warming 'underestimated'

Professor Chris Field, an author of a 2007 landmark report on climate change, said future temperatures "will be beyond anything" predicted. Prof Field said the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report had underestimated the rate of change. He said warming is likely to cause more environmental damage than forecast.


Here's a case of global warming overestimated!
It's a bit worrying if the IPCC use data from GISS who in turn get their data from some unnamed source who in turn provided the wrong month's temperature data and no one in the loop is in a position to pick up on it? Ben D.

Cold, Hard Facts

INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY
Posted 11/17/2008

Climate Change: Despite record snows and low temperatures around the world last month, a major Al Gore supporter says October was the hottest on record. The only thing being cooked here is not the Earth, but the books.

James Hansen, head of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies and global warming alarmist, is Al Gore's favorite scientist, part of that mythical global warming "consensus" that says we are doomed and man is the culprit. On Nov. 10 he announced that last month was the hottest October on record and we were still doomed.

Dr. Hansen has not only become global warming's Robin to Al Gore's Batman, he has also been a critic of the "deniers," those who dare to insist that the debate is far from over, and that the computer models used can't even predict the past, much less the future.
Hansen has said in the past that "heads of major fossil-fuel companies who spread disinformation about global warming should be 'tried for high crimes against humanity and nature.' " They pay for self-serving studies, and any scientist who disagrees with Gore is obviously on the take.
Christopher Booker, writing in the U.K. Telegraph, reports that Hansen apparently has been spreading disinformation all his own to come up with a conclusion that flies in the face of empirical evidence we can see with our own eyes.

Hansen's claim of the hottest October ever came after reports of unseasonal snow and record low temperatures. China's official news agency reported that Tibet had suffered its "worst snowstorm ever." The Swiss lowlands last month got the most snow for any October since records began. Zurich received 20 centimeters, breaking the record of 14 cm set in 1939. Ocala, Fla., experienced the second-lowest temperature recorded for October since 1850.

Elsewhere in the U.S., the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration registered 63 local snowfall records and 115 lowest-ever temperatures for the month, and ranked it as only the 70th warmest October in 114 years. So how did Hansen claim it was the warmest?
Booker writes: "The reason for the freak figures was that scores of temperature records from Russia and elsewhere were not based on October readings at all. Figures from the previous month had simply been carried over and repeated two months running."

As Booker reports, the glaring error was picked up by two intrepid climate bloggers — U.S. meteorologist Anthony Watts of Watts Up With That and Steve McIntyre of Climate Audit. McIntyre is the Canadian computer analyst who won fame for his expert debunking of the infamous "hockey stick" graph that purported to show Earth's temperature as stable until man started building SUVs, causing a sharp upward spike.

Caught with its pants down, the Goddard Institute started juggling its books. To compensate for the carrying over of the bogus temperature readings, it claimed to have discovered a new "hotspot" in the Arctic — in a month when satellite images were showing Arctic sea-ice 30% more extensive than at the same time last year. Ooops.

If Dr. Hansen thinks oil company executives should be tried for crimes against humanity for being skeptical about global warming claims and seeking the truth, what should the penalty be for him and his ilk? He is yelling fire in a crowded planet.

The Goddard now says it got the data from another body and didn't have the resources to verify the data. In the computer world, there's a phrase for this — garbage in, garbage out. The institute's figures are one of four data sets used by the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to come up with its doomsday scenarios.

We took a little, er, heat recently when we wrote that major agencies tracking earth's temperature (including the Hadley Climate Research Unit in Britain, the Christy group at the University of Alabama and Remote Sensing Systems Inc. in California) had reported "the earth cooled 0.7C in 2007, the fastest decline in the age of instrumentation, putting us back to where the earth was in 1930." Others, we were told, were claiming it wasn't so. They'd better check their numbers.
User avatar
Ben D
 
Posts: 2005
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 8:10 pm
Location: Australia
Blog: View Blog (3)

Postby Sounder » Mon Feb 16, 2009 11:51 am

Well at least we can count on the scum-sucking money grubbers on the right to point out that that the left has its own kind of money grubbers.

OK, I will conform to this and you conform to that, you say; 'we must create more jobs (war)', I say, 'we must 'save the earth'', then we can both be wrong in regards to our actual talents, yet we can still have that warm and fuzzy feeling of self-righteousness while the actual world drowns in an ocean of deceit.

And by all means... NEVER consider that hysteria is a reflection of internalized deceit rather than being an honest attempt to 'make the world a better place'.
All these things will continue as long as coercion remains a central element of our mentality.
Sounder
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Penguin » Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:08 pm

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn1 ... MP=OTC-rss

It seems the Arctic is belching out nitrous oxide – commonly known as laughing gas. Unfortunately, the punchline is that it is a powerful greenhouse gas.

Previously, emissions of N2O were thought to enter the atmosphere mainly from tropical forests and intensively managed farmland, with only a negligible amount from northerly environments.

Maija Repo and colleagues from the University of Kuopio, Finland, measured emissions from peat circles in northern Russia. These sit on peatland plateaux, which are widespread throughout the Arctic, covering 20% of the total land surface. The bare surfaces of peat circles develop because cycles of freezing and thawing churn up the peat, preventing plant growth.

During the snow-free season, they found the peat circles emitted 1.2 grams/m2 of N2O, which is just as much as tropical forests release in a year. The team reckons that a lack of plants decreases competition for the mineral nitrogen. This allows nitrate to accumulate in the soil which is then metabolised by bacteria to produce N2O.

Although this means N2O remains a small contributor to the greenhouse effect, compared with methane and carbon dioxide, the gas persists unaltered in the atmosphere for over 110 years, compared with around 10 years for methane – which is also periodically released by the tundra.

Unfortunately, global warming may promote churning, and expand bare areas. Since the flow of the gas from the peat circles is so high, even a small increase in bare surfaces would cause significant changes in N2O emissions, says Repo.

Journal reference: Nature Geoscience, DOI: 1038/NGEO434

(for the sceptics - you can come with me to Finlands Lapland, I can show you the last remaining frozen peat circles here. Theyre vanishing year by year - have been there for 8-9000 years too, forming ever since the last Ice age here. Now theyre vanishing, each year. Soon all gone)
Last edited by Penguin on Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Penguin
 
Posts: 5089
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 5:56 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Penguin » Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:17 pm

For balance, this (note that in the whole piece, no data is linked to, or referenced, not once, just his opinions):

http://news.bostonherald.com/news/natio ... ion=recent

SANTA FE, N.M. - Former astronaut Harrison Schmitt, who walked on the moon and once served New Mexico in the U.S. Senate, doesn’t believe that humans are causing global warming.

"I don’t think the human effect is significant compared to the natural effect," said Schmitt, who is among 70 skeptics scheduled to speak next month at the International Conference on Climate Change in New York.

Schmitt contends that scientists "are being intimidated" if they disagree with the idea that burning fossil fuels has increased carbon dioxide levels, temperatures and sea levels.


"They’ve seen too many of their colleagues lose grant funding when they haven’t gone along with the so-called political consensus that we’re in a human-caused global warming," Schmitt said.

Dan Williams, publisher with the Chicago-based Heartland Institute, which is hosting the climate change conference, said he invited Schmitt after reading about his resignation from The Planetary Society, a nonprofit dedicated to space exploration.

Schmitt resigned after the group blamed global warming on human activity. In his resignation letter, the 74-year-old geologist argued that the "global warming scare is being used as a political tool to increase government control over American lives, incomes and decision making."

Williams said Heartland is skeptical about the crisis that people are proclaiming in global warming.

"Not that the planet hasn’t warmed. We know it has or we’d all still be in the Ice Age," he said. "But it has not reached a crisis proportion and, even among us skeptics, there’s disagreement about how much man has been responsible for that warming."

Schmitt said historical documents indicate average temperatures have risen by 1 degree per century since around 1400 A.D., and the rise in carbon dioxide is because of the temperature rise.

Schmitt also said geological evidence indicates changes in sea level have been going on for thousands of years. He said smaller changes are related to changes in the elevation of land masses — for example, the Great Lakes are rising because the earth’s crust is rebounding from being depressed by glaciers.

Schmitt, who grew up in Silver City and now lives in Albuquerque, has a science degree from the California Institute of Technology. He also studied geology at the University of Oslo in Norway and took a doctorate in geology from Harvard University in 1964.

In 1972, he was one of the last men to walk on the moon as part of the Apollo 17 mission.

Schmitt said he’s heartened that the upcoming conference is made up of scientists who haven’t been manipulated by politics.

Of the global warming debate, he said: "It’s one of the few times you’ve seen a sizable portion of scientists who ought to be objective take a political position and it’s coloring their objectivity."

-------------------------------------------------

What he again ignores, is that the long term geological data says we should now be in a cooling period, going forward to the next ice age..
Which is not happening. Instead, its getting warmer. He should know, hes a fucking geologist!

And not worrying is surely not political in any way? Lets just go on drilling for oil and burning it, like weve done all the while..No need to lose that car, no need to get off that couch. Its the governmint thats out to get you!

(Again, biggest threat imho is all the other ecological destruction - forest cover loss, habitat loss, 1/3 of all species facing extinction or already extinct, environmental poisons, amphibians and bees in peril, birds disappearing in places, fish stocks collapsing in all major fisheries or already collapsed, jellyfish exploding, the warming is just one side effect of that. We ignore that at our peril. And the official solutions - well, theyre IGNORING THIS AT OUR PERIL, presently. Dont worry, well start a carbon market and improve the efficiency of technology, so we can go on growing sustainably!)
Penguin
 
Posts: 5089
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 5:56 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Penguin » Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:26 pm

What the fuck, golden oldies!

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/u ... 195538.ece

Walking to the shops ‘damages planet more than going by car’

The sums were done by Chris Goodall, campaigning author of How to Live a Low-Carbon Life, based on the greenhouse gases created by intensive beef production. “Driving a typical UK car for 3 miles [4.8km] adds about 0.9 kg [2lb] of CO2 to the atmosphere,” he said, a calculation based on the Government’s official fuel emission figures. “If you walked instead, it would use about 180 calories. You’d need about 100g of beef to replace those calories, resulting in 3.6kg of emissions, or four times as much as driving.

“The troubling fact is that taking a lot of exercise and then eating a bit more food is not good for the global atmosphere. Eating less and driving to save energy would be better.”

-------------------------------------------------------

Yeah, similarly twisted thinking. Lets not take into account the manufacturing of the car, the mining of the metals, the drilling of the oil..The space taken by the roads, the energy and resources used to make the asphalt, and so on..
What about "Lose that fucking car entirely, thereby not moving that ton of steel around at all, and then stopping eating that fucking beef too, you fat ass?"

What idiocy.

Only in the last paragraph:

The ideal diet would consist of cereals and pulses. “This is a route which virtually nobody, apart from a vegan, is going to follow,” Mr Goodall said. But there are other ways to reduce the carbon footprint. “Don’t buy anything from the supermarket,” Mr Goodall said, “or anything that’s travelled too far.”


Which "nearly no one does". Why not? Is it too much trouble?
I get by just fine, with very little milk and cheese in addition to "being vegan". No car either - a bicycle. Which is the most energy efficient transport currently available. Wonder why it wasnt even mentioned? Too dangerous, with all those cars? Ah, I see.
Penguin
 
Posts: 5089
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 5:56 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Ben D » Mon Feb 16, 2009 8:24 pm

Apparently James Hansen has been caught out inflating the temperatures again, perhaps even a serial manipulater? Given the corruption that we know afflicts human organizations most everywhere, why should anyone expect the the politics of GW to be any different.

GISS, Hansen Frequently Report False Warming

Written By: James M. Taylor
Published In: Environment & Climate News > February 2009
Publication date: 02/01/2009
Publisher: The Heartland Institute

Nobody outside of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies knows for sure why the organization so often reports warming trends not reflected in the actual temperature measurements.

That’s because the organization’s director, astronomer James Hansen, refuses to disclose how and why he makes his temperature adjustments.

Hansen is one of the world’s most prominent and vocal advocates of an impending global warming crisis, going so far as to call for putting global warming skeptics through Nuremburg-style trials for crimes against humanity.

While Hansen believes those who disagree with him should face potential capital punishment, his Goddard Institute repeatedly has been caught providing erroneous temperature reports that always err on the side of claiming more global warming than has actually occurred.

Artificially Inflating Temps

In 2007, statistical scientists showed GISS had been artificially inflating U.S. temperatures by 0.15 degrees Celsius since the year 2000. As a result of the false reports, GISS had erroneously reported U.S. temperatures this decade were warmer than those in the 1930s, when in fact the opposite was true.

In 2008 statistical scientists showed GISS had falsely reported October 2008 was the warmest October on record, when in fact it was a quite normal temperature month. (See “‘Warmest October’ Claim Was Wrong, NASA Admits,” Environment & Climate News, January 2009.)

And now, after being exposed by meteorologist Anthony Watts for cooking the books with regard to Santa Rosa, California and potentially many other temperature stations (see story on facing page), analysts say it is becoming impossible to ignore the obvious conflict of interest in having a partisan global warming crisis advocate overseeing and exercising unaccountable, arbitrary “adjustments” to raw temperature data.

Adjusting Data for Advocacy

“James Hansen and his underlings at GISS will always find a way to make the temperature data fit his global warming advocacy,” said Robert Ferguson, president of the Science and Public Policy Institute.

“Hansen’s track record for presenting false data is undeniable, and yet neither the press nor the government holds him accountable for his self-serving errors and lack of objectivity,” Ferguson added. “You couldn’t make this stuff up if you tried—you would be laughed out of the room if you presented this as a plausible story line in a fiction novel.”
User avatar
Ben D
 
Posts: 2005
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 8:10 pm
Location: Australia
Blog: View Blog (3)

Don't trust astronauts.

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Mon Feb 16, 2009 10:12 pm

Don't trust astronauts.

They are hardcore military and trained to be voices for the military government due to their special quasi-religious status in the eyes of the public.
CIA runs mainstream media since WWII:
news rooms, movies/TV, publishing
...
Disney is CIA for kidz!
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby tazmic » Tue Feb 17, 2009 6:10 am

Penguin, read any Illich?

"A century ago, the ball-bearing was invented. It reduced the coefficient of friction by a factor of a thousand. By applying a well-calibrated
ball-bearing between two Neolithic millstones, a man could now grind in a day what took his ancestors a week. The ball-bearing also made
possible the bicycle, allowing the wheel -- probably the last of the great Neolithic inventions -- finally to become useful for self-powered mobility."

(Interesting that he is coming from an anti-globalization position, with arguments largely in line with 'globalizing' agenda 21 policies.)
User avatar
tazmic
 
Posts: 1097
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:58 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Penguin » Tue Feb 17, 2009 6:55 am

tazmic wrote:Penguin, read any Illich?

"A century ago, the ball-bearing was invented. It reduced the coefficient of friction by a factor of a thousand. By applying a well-calibrated
ball-bearing between two Neolithic millstones, a man could now grind in a day what took his ancestors a week. The ball-bearing also made
possible the bicycle, allowing the wheel -- probably the last of the great Neolithic inventions -- finally to become useful for self-powered mobility."

(Interesting that he is coming from an anti-globalization position, with arguments largely in line with 'globalizing' agenda 21 policies.)


I had not. Thanks!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4513929.stm Bicycle voted the greatest invention of mankind

http://www.calfeedesign.com/bamboo.htm High-tech bikes out of treated bamboo and hemp fiber composite

http://www.calfeedesign.com/BambooOverview.htm
Calfee Design is working towards assisting entrepreneurs in the developing world to make their own bicycles out of locally sourced bamboo. The reasons to do this are so strong that it would be foolish not to try:

1. Bicycles are in great demand as a major labor savings device. Transporting water, people, food and other items is six times more efficient.
2. Bamboo bikes cost less than inferior imported steel bikes.
3. Bamboo is plentiful and does not need to be imported as a raw material. Bamboo is easy to grow and can be cultivated in dry areas with minimal irrigation.
4. Bamboo bikes require a significant amount of labor to produce, providing skilled employment and an apprenticeship model that helps youth find opportunity.
5. Bamboo bicycle production is not easily done in large factories. This keeps large industrialized countries from getting into the business and competing on an unfair level.
6. Making Bamboo bikes does not require electricity or a large investment in equipment.


http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~david/duc ... /Home.html


The Bamboo Bike Project is a project by Scientists and Engineers at The Earth Institute at Columbia University, and aims to examine the feasibility of implementing cargo bikes made of bamboo as a sustainable form of transportation in Africa. The ultimate goals of the project are:

1.To build a better bike for poor Africans in rural areas.
2.To stimulate a bicycle building industry in Africa to satisfy local needs.

We have determined that it is possible to source the material and supplies necessary to build a bamboo cargo bicycle in Africa, and train the local people to build the bikes. The next steps are:

3.To setup systematic bamboo cargo bike building training.
4.To setup a supply chain of necessary parts and supplies.
5.To scale the effort so that it makes an impact.

------------------
besides, riding a bike is the most fun you can do outside a bed.

Bicycles are not only thermodynamically efficient, they are also cheap. With his much lower salary, the Chinese acquires his durable bicycle in a fraction of the working hours an American devotes to the purchase of his obsolescent car. The cost of public utilities needed to facilitate bicycle traffic versus the price of an infrastructure tailored to high speeds is proportionately even less than the price differential of the vehicles used in the two systems. In the bicycle system, engineered roads are necessary only at certain points of dense traffic, and people who live far from the surfaced path are not thereby automatically isolated as they would be if they depended on cars or trains. The bicycle has extended man's radius without shunting him onto roads he cannot walk. Where he cannot ride his bike, he can usually push it.

The bicycle also uses little space. Eighteen bikes can be parked in the place of one car, thirty of them can move along in the space devoured by a single automobile. It takes three lanes of a given size to move 40,000 people across a bridge in one hour by using automated trains, four to move them on buses, twelve to move them in their cars, and only two lanes for them to pedal across on bicycles. Of all these vehicles, only the bicycle really allows people to go from door to door without walking. The cyclist can reach new destinations of his choice without his tool creating new locations from which he is barred.


Im not against globalization, Im against centralized market globalization and profiteering.

We absolutely need to become a global interconnected tribe, psychologically and spiritually. But this has nothing to do with "globalization" as its generally understood, and nothing to do with organizations like WTO, IMF, or trade agreements like GATT.
Last edited by Penguin on Tue Feb 17, 2009 7:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
Penguin
 
Posts: 5089
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 5:56 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby brainpanhandler » Tue Feb 17, 2009 7:09 am

Apparently James Hansen has been caught out inflating the temperatures again, perhaps even a serial manipulater? Given the corruption that we know afflicts human organizations most everywhere, why should anyone expect the the politics of GW to be any different.


Indeed and so perhaps Hansen is being utilized to discredit climate change.

Oh well, since we can't ever know the truth from the comfort of our living rooms, best to throw our hands up and carry on as usual.
"Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." - Martin Luther King Jr.
User avatar
brainpanhandler
 
Posts: 5121
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 9:38 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Penguin » Tue Feb 17, 2009 7:19 am

brainpanhandler wrote:
Apparently James Hansen has been caught out inflating the temperatures again, perhaps even a serial manipulater? Given the corruption that we know afflicts human organizations most everywhere, why should anyone expect the the politics of GW to be any different.


Indeed and so perhaps Hansen is being utilized to discredit climate change.

Oh well, since we can't ever know the truth from the comfort of our living rooms, best to throw our hands up and carry on as usual.


Yeah. That GW is used politically, does not make it untrue. That it is being used for evil ends, does not make in untrue. It does, however, make it a red herring - seen against the background of all our other problems, of which it is a symptom:

http://www.mindfully.org/Plastic/Ocean/ ... cNov03.htm

http://news.mongabay.com/2005/1115-forests.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desertification

http://ezinearticles.com/?Over-1,000-Ne ... id=1970125

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone_depletion

http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/sci_t ... fish.shtml
Depleting fish stocks

http://www.thenews.com.pk/print1.asp?id=119982 Cars and urban congestion

http://www.cwac.net/landuse/index.html Cars cause urban sprawl

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habitat_destruction

http://news.mongabay.com/2007/0417-dirt.html Loss of fertile top soil a global problem

http://www.rewilding.org/thesixthgreatextinction.htm
The most important—and gloomy—scientific discovery of the twentieth century was the extinction crisis. During the 1970s, field biologists grew more and more worried by population drops in thousands of species and by the loss of ecosystems of all kinds around the world. Tropical rainforests were falling to saw and torch. Wetlands were being drained for agriculture. Coral reefs were dying from god knows what. Ocean fish stocks were crashing. Elephants, rhinos, gorillas, tigers, polar bears, and other “charismatic megafauna” were being slaughtered. Frogs were vanishing. Even Leviathan—the great whales—were being hunted down in their last redoubts of the Antarctic and Arctic seas, and their end was in sight. These staggering losses were in oceans and on the highest peaks; they were in deserts and in rivers, in tropical rainforests and Arctic tundra alike.

I could go on and on and on.
If you dont believe global warming exists, you sure as hell should be able to notice the above mentioned problems, even with your bony forehead, in the case you are blind from birth.

Its just that the solutions to these problems arent very popular among governments, corporations, or people. Nor do they yield very well to centrally-controlled solutions of the kind our current control systems adore. The current solutions proposed (carbon taxes, carbon markets etc) are alike to twiddling with your willy while the house burns down around you.
Penguin
 
Posts: 5089
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 5:56 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Sounder » Tue Feb 17, 2009 9:45 am

The ‘problem’ is that our current expressions of psyche equate ‘success’ with the ability to manipulate and control external objects. So even when things go out of control; a by product of misguided manipulations, we still answer with the same style of ‘solution’ that created the problem in the first place.

Whether it is money given to fraud driven banks, apartheid Israel, conformist science or new markets for Carbon trading, we have to ask, how does this happen? How and why rather than who what and when.

Sorry to seem flippant, because I love you folk and learn lots, but the who, what, and when that entertains many people is so much trivia compared to the potential in creating a new conscious model of reality that is able to integrate (more) sub and unconscious elements into our conscious understanding. We will not stop playing the fool until we get the guts to actively try to re-write our programming.

The who, what and when relate to external objects, and by dealing only with these things one is promoting the existing, control things for success, dualistic programming.

People that do this belong to the invisible college of the PTMB (powers that make believe). Neophyte section.

That’s funny; it’s the self same ‘college’ that so many here rail against.

:snicker: :gringhost: :gringhost: :gringhost: :rideturtle: :farmer:
All these things will continue as long as coercion remains a central element of our mentality.
Sounder
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Penguin » Tue Feb 17, 2009 10:56 am

Well put, Sounder -
Thou I think youve told me this many times before.. :)
Its still very true. More so every day.

Keep telling us this. Maybe youll get through one of these days.

The ‘problem’ is that our current expressions of psyche equate ‘success’ with the ability to manipulate and control external objects. So even when things go out of control; a by product of misguided manipulations, we still answer with the same style of ‘solution’ that created the problem in the first place.


We equate "progress" with getting better - linear progress. Progress, with wealth - material wealth and how well we can manipulate the material world for our own gain, regardless of how it affects cyclical natural processes.

True progress would be to exist in ever greater balance with all the sphere of life. True progress would mean valuing all life as much as our own. It would mean valuing spiritual growth more than material possessions, or the manipulation of the material world.

http://www.rainbowbody.net/Finalempire/

http://www.atlanticfreepress.com/news/1 ... ?task=view
Kötke - The Heros Journey

The End of the World



We are all looking at the end of the world as we know it. Our attention is focused on the holes in the ozone layer, planetary warming, Peak Oil, the spread of DU weapons, the collapse of the house of credit cards, and the prospect of the planetary financial elite quickly establishing fascist control of the planet. Below this threshold of conscious awareness our biological survival systems are rapidly eroding. At this point some twenty percent of the planet’s soils erode each twenty-five year period. Each year at least two hundred thousand acres of irrigated crop-lands go out of production because of salinization or water-logging and experts say that sixty to eighty percent of all irrigated acreage is due to follow the eight to ten million acres that have historically gone into ruination from irrigation. The total drylands of the planet are 7.9 billion acres of which 61% are desertified, that is, driven by human abuse toward uselessness. Globally, 23% of all arable crop lands have been lost since 1945 through human use and experts say that all arable land on the planet will be ruined in 200 years.


It is estimated that prior to the human culture that we term civilization, one third of the planet was covered with closed canopy forest. Now forests cover 10% of the earth. In the oceans the collapse of major fish stocks is increasing. At least eight stocks have collapsed beginning with the Antarctic Blue Whale in 1935 to the Peruvian Anchovy stock collapse in the late-twentieth century. Since 1984 the world fish catch has been shrinking even with greater investment and the taking of what in former times were considered "trash" fish. Of the 32 ocean fisheries, 30 are in decline and some of those are collapsing. At the same time coral reefs and mangrove swamps which are considered the "incubators" of sea life are dwindling precipitously.


Soil is the basis of the planetary terrestrial life. In the best of circumstances such as old growth forests and prairies, soil builds at the rate of one inch each three hundred to a thousand years. It is being exhausted and is eroding away. The way that the industrial system has continued to increase the food supply is by trading off soil fertility for fossil fuel energy through artificial fertilizers. Now, nearly half of the world’s people eat because of the added production of food caused by artificial fertilizers being injected into depleted soils and the use of all of the other accouterments of fossil- fueled industrial agriculture.. Half of the planetary population are hanging out on a limb essentially eating petroleum! Now as the population continues to explode, we reach Peak Oil and its decline. We do not need to continue filling in the details. Our intellect can draw the conclusion for us. An exponentially exploding world population with increasing material consumption, based on dwindling resources and a dying planet, won’t work!




But this is not a new phenomenon as some would assume. This culture of civilization, of empire, was an ecological catastrophe when it began some eight thousand years ago. It is this culture and its inculcated reality-view that is the disaster. Half of China was once a great temperate zone forest. That forest was gone before recorded history, destroyed by the Han Chinese Empire. The Indus River Valley Empire had ecologically destroyed its habitat before recorded history. We do have recorded history of the Sumerian and Babylonian empires. We know they decimated the forests and overgrazed the landscape. One third of the land in Iraq that should be arable right now is still so salinized from imperial irrigation four and five thousand years ago that it cannot be used. The erosion material coming down the Tigris and Euphrates rivers from that destroyed the watershed has filled in 185 miles of the gulf. As we follow the history of this type of human culture we find the Mid-East ecologically denuded. The empires of Greece and Rome used Turkey and North Africa as "breadbaskets." Now, there are towns in Turkey, North Africa and even in Italy that were port cities during those empires which are now ten and fifteen miles from the water - all filled in with erosion material from the ecologically destroyed landscapes. Then we go on to the destruction of the great forests of Europe and now the whole world. These examples and many more are indelible effects on the world ecosystem which have not recovered in thousands of years.


The Success of the Human Species


Are humans a failed species? Is it what some Natives Americans have said, "very shrewd but have no wisdom?" When we look around the biosphere we see that most other species devote much of their life energies to birthing, raising and protecting their progeny. In this respect, civilized humans are a failed species. They can’t even keep the planet alive for their descendants. But humans have been a marvelously successful species. For several million years we existed as forager/hunters. We lived in balance with the ecosystem, migrating in our traditional patterns around our areas gathering the fruits of the earth. We were adapted to the planetary life. We developed astonishing oral literatures; we developed a rich cultural life. Anthropology says that each forager/hunter worked an average of 500 hours per year obtaining the necessaries of life. Traditional agriculturalists like the Hopi or Balinese worked 1,000 hours per year and had shorter life spans. Now the modern industrial person works 2,000 hours per year on average and only stays alive because they have health insurance. Anthropology says that the forager/hunters (even those still remaining) have almost perfect health.


They also had a rich culture. They didn’t simply sit around the campfire but created voluminous oral literature, great works of art as handcrafts and a rich ceremonial life of the tribe. Our species lived with the living earth. We had wide knowledge of the living things around us and we respected life. Such a grotesque event as killing thousands of buffalo simply to take their tongues or hides away to market and to leave the carcasses to rot was an act that was inconceivably inhuman in the eyes of a forager/hunter.


Our ancestors were well fed with a widely varied diet. Anthropologists studying the Kung Bushmen of the inhospitable Kalahari Desert in Southern Africa say that each person’s daily protein intake was more than Britain’s and exceeded by only ten industrial countries. The proportion of men and women over sixty was only ten percent smaller than industrial countries. Forager/hunters who lived in more luxurious ecosystems did even better. This means that most of the people of the third world and the poor of the first world do not even have the living standards of the Kung Bushmen, and for eight thousand years, all of those who did breast beating about the superiority of "civilization" did not even come up to the living standards of free living forager/hunters - talk about being sold a bill of goods!


For 99% of the time our species has lived successfully in balance with the energy flows of the earth. The soil community with its millions of inhabitants provides a milieu in which plant roots can absorb nutrients that are in solution. The plant community sheds leaves and other organic debris onto the soil which feeds it as it is eaten by the "decomposers." This cycling of biological energy is then extrapolated to the cycles of life of all the other biological entities of the ecosystem through the food chains and other services species do for each other in what is an energy flow system with photosynthesis as the primary motor. This is the energy flow system that our species was adapted to for an untold period of time. Being a small nomadic group (average of 28 people according to anthropology) we had a cooperative culture, a sharing culture, and being migratory we only carried necessary items so that materialism, the accumulation and adulation of material goods, did not occur.


The Inversion


Then in Central Asia and Northern China, humans began to destroy the living planet with agriculture and herding. The military based empires began to grow by running a net deficit of the earth’s fertility - a human culture based in looting, thievery. This culture began then, in just an eye blink of time, just eight to ten thousand years, and the energy adaptation changed. Humans began civis, towns, the root of the word civilization. Male dominance - patriarchy, the horse and militarism became rooted in the soil, to grow based on sucking out the fertility of the earth. This culture was, in its origin, a culture of coercion based upon biological slaves such as annual plants and domesticated animals and human slaves, in order to extort fertility from the earth. The ecological history of empire is there for all to see. We no longer gather the fruits of the earth, we force the earth to give up surpluses, profits, until the earth can no longer, then we move on. This is the culture of empire, a culture of growth and imbalance. Its main tenets are patriarchy, hierarchy, materialism, and militarism. The configuration of the imperial system is: an Emperor (male), surrounded by a small financial/military elite, who control and profit from a coercive hierarchal command system. That is, they feed off the productive social activities of the people in society!


Now we are near the end. The culture of empire has spread over the earth except for a few pockets of remaining forager/hunters. As the exploding population meets the dwindling resources, societies begin to unravel. We are beginning to see massive cities around the planet, each encircled by millions of the poor. These people are still fed by the dwindling acres, but the breaking point is in sight.


The Gauntlet


The human species is faced with an ultimatum. Will the species die off or can a rabbit be pulled out of the hat over the long term? Inasmuch as humans live from other living things, we know that whatever humans may exist in two hundred years will be humans that have been able to keep their area of the planet alive.


We live in an era in which a number of things are occurring that have never happened to the species before. We live in a time of human-caused, mass, global, die-off of species. This is the third and largest mass die-off of species since life began on earth, the previous (and second) die-off being when the dinosaurs went down millions of years ago. Humans have also caused the ozone holes and the climate warming. But, we also now have planetary communication and through the internet we also have planetary communication available on an individual level. This is the first time that the human species as a whole can communicate. This is also the first time that humans are in control of evolution on this whole planet and the possible further manifestation of themselves. Humans are in control and the choices that they make in the next few generations will determine the course for the future of the species as well as the earth.


The Cultural Conditioning


Culture is hypnosis. A hypnotic suggestion can be given in deep trance or in light trance, a state of conscious attention such as watching television. In light trance the suggestion is repetitive over time. We have all had a world view suggested to us by our cultural conditioning. For example, we intellectually know that, except for native people, the rest of us in the American hemisphere and many other places on the planet are colonials. But, we don’t subconsciously hold this understanding because of culturalization. Since birth we have heard of "warlike" Indians. But intellectually we know that any country that is invaded will put up a vigorous response. Intellectually we know that, according to the historian Eduardo Galeano, up to 70 million native people were eliminated from the Americas by sword and pestilence yet we subconsciously view the holocaust of the Jews and Armenians as the only significant massacres.


In this manner our world view is created. The gold fish does not see the water. As our culture instructs us that wealth is security and is the purpose of life, we use up the earth more rapidly toward our demise. On a psychological level we identify with our material possessions and subconsciously assume our existence without these elements would be non-identity. Our needs toward greater ego-security also point toward our demise.


The Species Initiation


Now that the planet-wide human species, is by default, in control of the life of the earth we can understand what would be needed for the species to succeed to full maturity. The first order is to stay alive. To do that we must maintain that which feeds and shelters us. We must keep the earth alive and ecologically restore it even in the areas of dense human population today. Our reality view is, in fact, global now by default. Ozone holes, nuclear radiation, sea level rise, planet heating and the rubbing out of the living flesh of the earth are global phenomena.


Like the Six Nations Iroquois who frame each tribal decision to its effects on the seventh generation, we must create a reality frame as the life of the earth. Given our subconscious conditioning that is difficult, but in this case our intellect can lead us. If we can frame our cultural reality view as based upon the care of the earth and teach that to the children, then many other cultural values will flow from that.


A present day citizen of the earth, if they were a mature and responsible adult, would say that honorable actions would perpetuate the living earth for its sake as well as for the progeny of the human species. That commitment at the level of the whole species would signify the initiation of the species to maturity.


The Hero At The Portals of Initiation


The center does not hold.. Oil and the resources of the earth such as soil and forests are exhausting as the mass swells. Can the hero make it through the disintegration? Can small land based, self-sufficient communities make it through, some of them? Can they carry the universal value of life through with their culture? Can they create a culture that will spread in the future, that focuses on the highest development of each human as a person rather than the highest rung up the ladder of empire? This is what is being asked of the hero for initiation into human species maturity - nothing less than courage, the adherence to the culture of life over long periods of time and transformation.


All the elements that we need exist. We have examples of alternative buildings, created from local materials, with solar advantages that can heat and cool themselves with no outside energy inputs. We have a world-wide movement to Permaculture which can help us restore ecologies while producing more human food per acre than the industrial system. We have a wide and increasing selection of human development methods which can aid in the development of each individual to their highest potential - outside the materialist paradigm. We have planetary communication through the internet whose maintenance could require few resources.


When the hero can succeed at the matter of keeping the human species and the planet alive and see that as just a "housekeeping" duty, then we can get on with the truly challenging task of creating a positive and joyous human culture to which the hero is entitled.
Penguin
 
Posts: 5089
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 5:56 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Sounder » Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:40 pm

Well put, Sounder -
Thou I think youve told me this many times before..
Its still very true. More so every day.

Keep telling us this. Maybe youll get through one of these days.


Thanks Penguin, you are so kind. I can appreciate that many folk think of me as Johnny one note or obsessive. I do play many other notes but until the sound of this note is recognized, I see little benefit in introducing other notes. Besides I do best to keep my own practice simple.

Hey Penguin, have you read the Anastasia material? I have not but know that I ought to.

http://www.rainbowbody.net/Finalempire/anastasia.htm
All these things will continue as long as coercion remains a central element of our mentality.
Sounder
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Penguin » Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:44 pm

Havent..Ill look into it now.
"All one needs to make music, is one note".

http://www.vladimirmegre.com/vladimir_megre_story.php
http://www.amazon.com/Anastasia-Ringing ... 0976333309

"A person himself is nothing other than a materialized image, and being a materialized image, a person himself may create and materialize images. This comprises his Universal power that can be surpassed by no-one and nothing.

"If a person is not conscious of the abilities bestowed upon him by the Creator, then this person is himself blocking his most majestic power, and this person falls under the influence of other images, and materializes their ideas up to the point of the destruction of himself, his family, his lineage, his country, and the entire planet."

"The artificial technocratic world has also been created by Man using the energy of images which, however, infuse confront? A person with the very opposite of what they intended."
Penguin
 
Posts: 5089
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 5:56 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 173 guests