Dora the Explorer Waterboards Boots the Monkey!

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:34 am

Gawd, HCE, you know nothing about the subject. Zero.
No wonder you act that way.

There's no excuse for not knowing anything about spook media by now.

Use that keyboard in front of you to do some research. I did.
http://rigorousintuition.ca/board/viewtopic.php?t=18523
(Resources on history of CIA in news and entertainment)

Included is a link to the (declassified in 1995) 1953 letters from a high-level CIA mole at Paramount Pictures back to his CIA contact at Langley. Read the damn letter, mkay?
IF THAT ISN'T ENOUGH FOR YOU...

...I could spoon feed you a big list of books but I'm just going to
start you off with two-

http://www.amazon.com/Hollywood-Goes-Wa ... 0520071611

Hollywood Goes to War: How Politics, Profits and Propaganda Shaped World War II Movies

Image

http://www.amazon.com/Operation-Hollywo ... 1591021820

Operation Hollywood: How the Pentagon Shapes and Censors the Movies


Image
CIA runs mainstream media since WWII:
news rooms, movies/TV, publishing
...
Disney is CIA for kidz!
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby orz » Fri Jun 05, 2009 4:05 am

You're in touch with the authors of those books to share your research of course, and they take you totally seriously and don't think you're a nut or anything, and would agree with your theories.... yeah? I mean your theories are so well thought out and not at all contradictory to the reality of how movies are made and the politics behind them as detailed in those books and eleswhere. That's why you post about this stuff on mainstream non-'conspiracy culture' forums all the time, and people are easily convinced by your eloquent and educational posts and sceptics fail to disprove what you are saying and you don't ever get banned for being a copypasta-spewing troll nutcase. And now so many of the 'kidz' know all about this stuff and how to avoid it, seek the truth, improve the world.

YEAH?
orz
 
Posts: 4107
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 9:25 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby brekin » Fri Jun 05, 2009 11:42 am

Dora Denies Any Wrongdoing, Says Just Following Orders.

Image
User avatar
brekin
 
Posts: 3229
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:21 pm
Blog: View Blog (1)

Postby H_C_E » Sat Jun 06, 2009 2:33 am

95% of the reason I remain here at Pessimism Central is to hassle Mr. Water Mammal. It would appear I've pushed his buttons again.

Thanks for playing ya' maroon!

PS: It's not that I don't understand, but that I don't care.
Abdul, wax the beach with postal regret portions. Nevermind the o-ring leader he got not the cheese duster from the dachshund dimension or even pillow frighteners.
H_C_E
 
Posts: 588
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 5:02 pm
Location: Loud Pants
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Col. Quisp » Sat Jun 06, 2009 8:50 pm

I like reading HMW's posts and although I don't agree with all of them, I admire him for taking the time to research thoroughly and come up with novel ideas, unlike most.

HCE - why not just ignore him if you don't care to understand them. Why hassle him all the time?

Propaganda is as old as the hills, why is HMW's theory so outlandish? And those that say he's a CIA plant should be banned in accordance with board policy.

Now to my question:

Why is Dora's mouth always open, Hugh? Any ideas? And that kid in the Pentagon -- his mouth is open too.

on edit forgot to add that I agree with Alice the K about the term "water boarding." I too thought it couldn't be all that bad -- sounded like surfing or something -- until I actually read the description of the process. Yikes
User avatar
Col. Quisp
 
Posts: 1076
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 10:43 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby monster » Sun Jun 07, 2009 12:26 am

Image
"I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline."
User avatar
monster
 
Posts: 1712
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 4:55 pm
Location: Everywhere
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Fixx » Sun Jun 07, 2009 3:52 am

Col. Quisp wrote:I like reading HMW's posts and although I don't agree with all of them, I admire him for taking the time to research thoroughly and come up with novel ideas, unlike most.
HCE - why not just ignore him if you don't care to understand them. Why hassle him all the time?

Propaganda is as old as the hills, why is HMW's theory so outlandish? And those that say he's a CIA plant should be banned in accordance with board policy.

Now to my question:

Why is Dora's mouth always open, Hugh? Any ideas? And that kid in the Pentagon -- his mouth is open too.

on edit forgot to add that I agree with Alice the K about the term "water boarding." I too thought it couldn't be all that bad -- sounded like surfing or something -- until I actually read the description of the process. Yikes


Perhaps that's why he is here, to discredit the board and get those who think he is a 'spook' or just a troll banned, thus slowly killing Jeff's board by injecting this KWH shite into almost every thread on here. Either that or Hugh is out to discredit KWH himslef, thereby making it a thing of ridicule when any one else mentions it.

My suggestion to Hugh: Fuck off somewhere else with all this shite.[/b]
Fixx
 
Posts: 190
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 7:04 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby monster » Sun Jun 07, 2009 4:17 am

Image
"I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline."
User avatar
monster
 
Posts: 1712
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 4:55 pm
Location: Everywhere
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby orz » Sun Jun 07, 2009 4:24 pm

orz
 
Posts: 4107
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 9:25 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby monster » Sun Jun 07, 2009 4:26 pm

Image
"I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline."
User avatar
monster
 
Posts: 1712
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 4:55 pm
Location: Everywhere
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Seamus OBlimey » Tue Jul 07, 2009 12:15 pm

Does anyone remember Dick and Dora?

Image

The pic's from.. Happy Venture Readers @ http://www.sterlingtimes.org/dick_and_dora.htm

And another from google's top ten.. Chapter XII. Dick Visits Dora Stanhope

Maybe Hugh should give up on this one.. it's propaganda for little girls not old men :wink:
User avatar
Seamus OBlimey
 
Posts: 3154
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 4:14 pm
Location: Gods own country
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby beeline » Tue Jul 07, 2009 1:02 pm

Every time I see this thread title I crack up
User avatar
beeline
 
Posts: 2024
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 4:10 pm
Location: Killadelphia, PA
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby IanEye » Tue Jul 07, 2009 1:57 pm



Image

Boots looks pretty content on Cherry Street...
User avatar
IanEye
 
Posts: 4865
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 10:33 pm
Blog: View Blog (29)

Postby 8bitagent » Tue Jul 07, 2009 2:46 pm

Why does Hugh laugh off the "woo" when he himself is applying the same kind of Jake Kotze/Goro Adachi numerology and synchronistic fun and games to events and media?

I mean isn't that the fun here, the challenge? To look at every event or big media situation and extrapolate your own "find the esoteric or deep politic hidden codes"?

Jeff should at random assign us every week a totally random movie,
event, tv show, etc for us to make up our own "NWO/esoteric/CIA" syncs encoded in.

It'd be fun! We could mix and match Hugh Manatee-isms with syncs and numerology, to stitch together a pastiche of fun insanity!
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12244
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby professorpan » Wed Jul 08, 2009 3:26 pm

What baffles me the most is the seemingly sane and literate folks who defend the constant stream of outlandish, it-would-be-hilarious-if-it-wasn't-terribly-sad word salad diarrhea emerging from the manatee and splattering into this forum. Guess what? He's not "onto something." He might be "on something" and, if not, definitely should be "on something" of the make-the-voices-go-away variety.

It would all be pure comedy if it weren't so damned depressing to see such schizophrenic disassociation writ large. Really, if he wrote it as satire or in the spirit of play it would be engaging. But as a description of reality... just plain sad.
User avatar
professorpan
 
Posts: 3592
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 12:17 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 164 guests