Jani's at the mercy of her mind

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Jani's at the mercy of her mind

Postby justdrew » Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:15 pm

well, this is a difficult read, but here it is...
can't say I'm comfortable with all this drug testing on her...

Jani's at the mercy of her mind

The parents of a 6-year-old schizophrenic search for help against daunting odds for a patient so young and a case so severe.
By Shari Roan

June 29, 2009

It's been a rough week. A few days ago, at UCLA's Resnick Neuropsychiatric Hospital, 6-year-old Jani toppled a food cart and was confined to her room. She slammed her head against the floor, opening a bloody cut that sent her into hysterics. Later, she kicked the hospital therapy dog.

Jani normally likes animals. But most of her animal friends -- cats, rats, dogs and birds -- are phantoms that only she can see. January Schofield has schizophrenia. Potent psychiatric drugs -- in doses that would stagger most adults -- seem to skip off her. She is among the rarest of the rare: a child seemingly born mentally ill.

She suffers from delusions, hallucinations and paroxysms of rage so severe that not even her parents feel safe. She's threatened to climb into an oven. She's kicked and tried to bite her little brother. "I'm Jani, and I have a cat named Emily 54," she says, by way of introduction. "And I'm Saturn-the-Rat's baby sitter."

She locks her fingers in front of her chest and flexes her wrists furiously, a tic that surfaces when she's anxious.

She announces that she wants to be a veterinarian.

"I'm empathetic with rats," she says.

Asked what "empathetic" means, she smiles confidently. "It means you like rats."

The doctors have been trying a new antipsychotic medication, called Moban. Jani knows she is sick and that people want to help her.

"Is the Moban working?" her mother asks Jani during a visit.

"No. I have more friends."

Susan Schofield looks crestfallen.

She and her husband, Michael Schofield, have brought French fries. Jani takes a bite, runs around the room and circles back for another bite.

"You want the rats and cats to go away, don't you?" Susan asks, trying to make eye contact with her daughter.

Jani stuffs a French fry into her mouth.

"No," she says. "They're cool. Rats are cool."

About 1% of adults have schizophrenia; most become ill in their late teens or 20s. Approximately one in 10 will commit suicide.

Doctors and other mental health experts don't fully understand the disease, which has no cure. Jani's extreme early onset has left them almost helpless. The rate of onset in children 13 and under is about one in 30,000 to 50,000. In a national study of 110 children, only one was diagnosed as young as age 6.

"Child-onset schizophrenia is 20 to 30 times more severe than adult-onset schizophrenia," says Dr. Nitin Gogtay, a neurologist at the National Institute of Mental Health who helps direct the children's study, the largest such study in the world on the illness.

"Ninety-five percent of the time they are awake these kids are actively hallucinating," Gogtay says. "I don't think I've seen anything more devastating in all of medicine."

For Jani's parents, the most pressing issue is where Jani should live. She has been on the UCLA psych ward -- where she was placed during an emergency -- since Jan. 16. The ward is not designed for long-term care.

Jani can't return to her family's apartment in Valencia. Last fall, she tried to jump out of a second-story window.

Her parents -- Michael, a college English instructor, and Susan, a former radio traffic reporter -- must decide how to provide as much stability as possible for their daughter while also trying to protect their 18-month-old son.

"If Jani was 16, there would be resources," Michael says. "But very few hospitals, private or public, will take a 6-year-old."

Born Aug. 8, 2002, Jani was different from the start, sleeping fitfully for only about four hours a day. Most infants sleep 14 to 16 hours a day. Only constant, high-energy stimulation kept Jani from screaming.

"For the first 18 months, we would take her to malls, play areas, IKEA, anywhere we could find crowds," says Michael, 33. "It was impossible to overstimulate her. We would leave at 8 in the morning and be gone for 14 hours. We could not come home until Jani had been worn out enough so that she would sleep a couple of hours."

When Jani turned 3, her tantrums escalated. She lasted three weeks in one preschool and one week in another. She demanded to be called by different names; Rainbow one day, Blue-eyed Tree Frog the next. Make-believe friends filled her days -- mostly rats and cats and, sometimes, little girls.

She threw her shoes at people when angry and tried to push the car out of gear while Michael was driving. The usual disciplinary strategies parents use to teach their young children proper behavior -- time-outs, rules, positive rewards -- failed time and again for the Schofields.

"She would go into these rages where she would scream, hit, kick, scratch and bite. She could say, 'Mommy, I love you,' and seconds later switch into being really violent," Michael says.

Kindergarten lasted one week.

The Schofields consulted doctors and heard myriad opinions: bipolar disorder, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, ineffective parenting. No one considered schizophrenia.

In December 2007, they were referred to Dr. Linda Woodall, a psychiatrist in Glendale. Jani's medical records for the following year depict a doctor searching for effective medications while her patient slid further into a world stalked by rats and cats.

July 8, 2008: Claps hands, hops (tic-like); food can't touch; strips clothes off if she thinks they have a spot. Wants order and perfection in play, toys, stories.

Nov. 11, 2008: Talking to a "bird named 34" on her hand. Drawing on her clothes and body with permanent marker. Screaming at school and in the waiting room.

Jan. 7, 2009: Patient is psychotic; talking to rats naming them the days of the week . . . I believe it would be in the best interests of January and her family to have her placed in residential treatment.

Her parents named her January because they loved the sound of it. But this year, the month of January became the breaking point for a fragile family.

Jani's torment had escalated through much of 2008. She was hospitalized last fall for three weeks.

Jani tried, and failed, again to attend school. She choked herself with her hands, hit her head on the walls and said she wanted to die.

"Home was a nightmare, and school was a nightmare," Michael says.

A new imaginary friend named 400-the-Cat moved in. He told her to kick and hit other people. "We realized she didn't control her imaginary friends. They controlled her," Michael says. Many phantoms populated her mind now: two little girls named 100 Degrees and 24 Hours; 200-the-Rat; Magical 61-the-Cat; and 400.

Susan, 39, was laid off from her job in September, and although money was tight, she felt almost relieved. Jani needed constant supervision.

Woodall decided to try a new drug, Haldol, 1 milligram, twice a day. It seemed to calm Jani, and 400-the-Cat went away.

The Schofields made another attempt at first grade, sending Jani to school Jan. 12. But that day, the muscles on the left side of her body locked up, and the school called paramedics. She had developed dystonia, a movement disorder that causes involuntary contractions of muscles. It's a side effect of high doses of some psychotropic medications.

On Jan. 16, Michael dropped his daughter off at school again. "She seemed fine that morning," he said. She was taking a lower dose of Haldol plus medications to quell psychosis and stabilize mood.

But at 9:15, she began screaming that she wanted to see her brother, Bodhi. She threw her pencils and shoes, tried to jump out of the classroom window, then ran down the halls. The assistant principal called Michael and told him to come and take his daughter home.

Michael was drained.

"I knew if we took her home we couldn't get any help anywhere," he says. "We were fed up with nobody believing us, nobody helping us."

He refused.

The principal called the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department and reported that the parents had abandoned their misbehaving child. Three school psychologists were summoned by the assistant principal, and a sheriff's deputy called for a team of emergency psychiatric workers.

Jani was locked in an empty office playing with 24 Hours. The experts concluded she was psychotic and took her to UCLA.

Each day, before the Schofields visit, they stop at a Burger King for lunch and order take-out for Jani.

"So many people just thought we had a bratty kid," says Michael, feeding Bodhi as he squirms in a high chair in the restaurant. "UCLA was the first to tell us: 'It's not your fault -- there is something wrong with her brain.' "

When her family arrives, Jani looks surprised to see them although they visit every day. She is wearing a lime-green T-shirt and pink skirt with turquoise rubber shoes. Her hair is tousled. Her legs carry the last traces of baby fat. Susan dabs toothpaste on a toothbrush and runs it over her daughter's teeth for a few seconds -- the only dental care Jani will allow.

"I'd rather be 16," Jani says, putting a hand on her hip and tossing a flirty look over her shoulder. "I'm 14 on weekends, Thursdays, Wednesdays and Tuesdays."

She pauses. "All except for Mondays."

She loves Littlest Pet Shop toys, miniature animals with houses and furniture, and stacks them on a shelf in her room.

Although she can't sit still long enough to read a book, she is a voracious learner. She's also bright -- her IQ is 146. Over the years, Michael and Susan have entertained her by feeding her information well beyond her years: specifics of evolution, the Roman Empire, the periodic table of elements.

"What is the atomic symbol for tungsten?" Susan asks.

"W."

Jani talks about living in Calalini.

Where is Calalini?

She leans in to whisper her secret.

"Calalini is on the border between this world and my other world."

Jani's psychiatrist at UCLA, Dr. Karen Lim, has tried several medications. A whopping 300 milligrams of Thorazine manages to stop the psychosis, but it too causes dystonia.

Michael worries that the heavy doses of medication might kill his daughter. But without it, she might kill herself. Jani had recently told Michael that the temperature in Calalini had risen to 200 degrees -- a sign that her hallucinations are worsening. She also says that 400-the-Cat is being really bossy.

On a mid-April afternoon, Michael and Susan meet with Lim and Jani's social worker, Georgia Wagniere, to discuss the rejections from two residential facilities that primarily care for children who have been abused or neglected but are not severely mentally ill. No one wants to take in a 6-year-old schizophrenic.

"I feel like we're back to zero again," Michael says.

Susan proposes that the couple trade in their two-bedroom apartment and rent two one-bedroom units in the same complex. One parent would live with Bodhi and one with Jani on alternating days.

The group discusses the stress on the couple. Both Michael and Susan have relatives who were mentally ill, and both struggle with depression and take antidepressants. They receive no help from their families.

"It's been very taxing," Wagniere says. "It has disrupted your entire life; your finances, your mental status."

"I'm prepared to go the rest of my life like this," Michael says. "I'm not hanging on to the hope that she'll get better. My biggest fear is that she won't live to 18."

"I have more hope," Susan says softly, staring at the floor.

Bodhi begins fussing. Michael and Susan thank Wagniere and Lim and leave to visit Jani.

Lim gathers her papers and follows them down the hall. She has recently issued a formal diagnosis of child-onset schizophrenia. The case has tested the limits of the young doctor's expertise.

"Jani knows she is different from other children," she says. "She has a degree of insight. She says, 'If my parents don't love me, I'll go live with my rats.' "

Lim sighs.

"I would like to give the parents more hope that she won't kill herself."

She catches up to Michael and Susan and unlocks the three heavy security doors that separate the children's unit from the rest of the hospital. Jani's hair is pulled back in a braid. She begins to show off her Littlest Pet Shops.

A boy hospitalized on the unit passes by the open door of Jani's room and slams it shut. A stunned look crosses Jani's face. She pauses for a few seconds, then marches across the room announcing she is going to hit the boy. Michael stops her and tries to redirect her attention to her Pet Shop. But she turns on him, jumping and butting her head under his chin.

He winces and holds her arms as she kicks him in the legs, butts her head into his chest and tries to bite him through his T-shirt. "I just want to hit him! I just want to hit him!"

Hospital staff rush in and restrain her on the bed.

Jani's wailing rings down the hall. "I just want to hit him!"

About 20 minutes later, a tired Michael emerges from the room to drive home with Susan and Bodhi.

"She's calm now," he says. "But the next time she sees him, she'll hit him."

Finally, a break. A combination of Tegretol, Thorazine and lithium has blunted some of the rage and coaxed a few of the phantoms from Jani's mind. Lim discharges her June 1 after 133 days in the hospital.

The two apartments are ready. Jani will live in 925; Bodhi, just across the parking lot in 1035. Jani's apartment is modeled after the psychiatric ward. Her room has only a bed so that, during a tantrum, she can be placed where she won't hurt herself. The living room is called the day room and is packed with toys and games. The kitchen is the supply room.

The Schofields bought walkie-talkies to communicate between apartments. Michael has written Jani's schedule on a large white board, just like the hospital staff did: 14:00, occupational therapy; 15:00, quiet time; 16:00, outdoors; 17:00, dinner; 18:00, recreational therapy.

Whoever stays with Jani at night is referred to as her "staff."

Michael has been worried about paying rent on two places. But, he says, "We want her home. When she's not in Calalini -- where they all are -- we can have a relationship with her. We want to take what we can get."

The Schofields have sought home-based special services but aren't hopeful. They've tried to get respite care from a center that helps people with developmental disabilities but were told the service was available only for parents of autistic children.

"We've developed sort of a bunker mentality," Michael says. "Every time Susan and I have relied on other people, we've been disappointed."

Jani's school, however, will take her back, in a special-education classroom.

The family arrives at Jani's new home around 3 p.m. on a Monday.

"Honey!" Jani shouts, running across the parking lot to hug the family dog she hasn't seen in 4 1/2 months.

The wide-eyed, penetrating gaze Jani wore in the hospital -- when she stared as if trying to see into a person's brain -- is gone. She has spoken little of 400-the-Cat in recent days. But she flaps her hands and rarely stops moving as Michael and Susan show her a cupboard full of prizes she can earn with good behavior. As she becomes familiar with the three small rooms, she begins to relax. She laughs when Bodhi fusses. Friends have come by to visit and share in the homecoming.

"This is actually a very happy day," says Michael, as he takes in the scene. "She has beaten back probably the most severe mental illness known to man. My hope now is that we can maintain this stability for a while."

Jani opens the door to a small balcony where her parents have set up an easel with paper, markers, paints and chalk. She grabs chalk, scribbles on the board and looks up at her parents, grinning.

"Oh-oh," says Susan, with a sigh. She steps back and calls for Michael to have a look. He does. He says nothing.

400.
User avatar
justdrew
 
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: unknown
Blog: View Blog (11)

Postby thurnundtaxis » Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:35 pm

Image
User avatar
thurnundtaxis
 
Posts: 537
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby mentalgongfu2 » Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:42 pm

is this piece some kind of post-modern satire? the words escape me, but i find more than the subject disturbing
"When I'm done ranting about elite power that rules the planet under a totalitarian government that uses the media in order to keep people stupid, my throat gets parched. That's why I drink Orange Drink!"
User avatar
mentalgongfu2
 
Posts: 1966
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:02 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby MacCruiskeen » Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:58 pm

The usual disciplinary strategies parents use to teach their young children proper behavior -- time-outs, rules, positive rewards -- failed time and again for the Schofields.


Well, how could they possibly "succeed", those "usual disciplinary strategies"? Jesus christ almighty, she is six years old. ("Teach"! "Proper behavior"!)

There are so many blandly unexamined assumptions (and truly thunderous silences) in this gruesome article that it's hard to know where to start. Exactly how long has she been going through this purgatory of imprisonment, forced medication, emotional blackmail, and "the usual disciplinary strategies"??

"Diagnosed schizophrenic"! The only thing that's absolutely clear from this appalling screed is that the child is unusually intelligent and imaginative and lively and brave. For how much longer, though?
"Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte." - Max Liebermann,, Berlin, 1933

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, NYC, 1966

TESTDEMIC ➝ "CASE"DEMIC
User avatar
MacCruiskeen
 
Posts: 10558
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby lightningBugout » Tue Jun 30, 2009 12:23 am

I feel as though this article, its tone, the subject, the whole cast of characters and the mise en scene itself are a wry (or not at all wry) missive from a parallel world in which I do not live. I wouldn't even know where to begin with all the ways in which this is so wrong, in which the sophistication of understanding of medicine, diagnosis, mental illness, epistemology, ontological category, etc. is so incredibly ill-conceived.

Suffice it to say I'm with Gong Fu and Mr. McCruise Skiing.

Image

And, on edit, all of this begs the question, how did the universe just pull that synchro-trick on me in which I posted a non-sequitur picture of the pre-eminent (lunatic fringe version of) avatar against the use of psychotropic drugs for kids?
"What's robbing a bank compared with founding a bank?" Bertolt Brecht
User avatar
lightningBugout
 
Posts: 2515
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2008 3:34 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Avalon » Tue Jun 30, 2009 12:28 am

The Louis Wain cat pictures, long thought to be evidence of schizophrenic deterioration, have actually in recent years been analyzed using a lot of updated information about what we know of the art created by those with mental illness. I can't recall the conclusions offhand or supply URLs (I came across it while looking into some other Wain material), but just wanted to mention that its possible schozophrenic nature may be now less likely.
User avatar
Avalon
 
Posts: 1529
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 2:53 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby justdrew » Tue Jun 30, 2009 12:29 am

"Potent psychiatric drugs -- in doses that would stagger most adults -- seem to skip off her."

maybe because a child of 5-6 has a completely different brain than an adult? and this one clearly is different from most other children. but hey, she's got a temper and poor impulse control.

It has apparently never been considered that they wold do anything other than pump her full of a cocktail of psychotropics. None of which were ever indicated for or tested on children.

nor apparently has is occurred to anyone to find a way to help her get to a more normal sleep pattern. I would think that would be a better place to start than fracking Thorazine and the rest. at one point the article lists three different being used at once. A full spectrum genetic screening is called for, and metabolic analysis and diet adjustments may also be useful.

Neither parent is getting help from their extended families the article says. Everywhere they turn, everyone has let them down. I don't know how they're paying the rent and everything else. An English instructor doesn't make all that much money typically, and the mother is now unemployed.
Last edited by justdrew on Tue Jun 30, 2009 12:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
justdrew
 
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: unknown
Blog: View Blog (11)

Postby Perelandra » Tue Jun 30, 2009 12:33 am

lightningBugout wrote:I feel as though this article, its tone, the subject, the whole cast of characters and the mise en scene itself are a wry (or not at all wry) missive from a parallel world in which I do not live. I wouldn't even know where to begin with all the ways in which this is so wrong, in which the sophistication of understanding of medicine, diagnosis, mental illness, epistemology, ontological category, etc. is so incredibly ill-conceived.

Thank you.
User avatar
Perelandra
 
Posts: 1648
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:12 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Fresno_Layshaft » Tue Jun 30, 2009 12:39 am

The responses to this article are pretty creepy. Whenever the subject of mental illness comes up here, the reactions are strong and perplexing. Some, oddly, seem fiercely protective of mental illness itself, I don't know how else to describe it. It's strange.

I mean, there was nothing strange or sinister about that story at all. It was just the story of a sick child and her desperate, suffering parents. The illness happened to be schizophrenia, and the only way to treat that is with strong drugs, that nobody wants to give to a child. But what is the alternative? Let 400 The Cat tell Jani to jump out the window?
Nothing will Change.
User avatar
Fresno_Layshaft
 
Posts: 320
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 9:06 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby lightningBugout » Tue Jun 30, 2009 12:47 am

Fresno_Layshaft wrote:The responses to this article are pretty creepy. Whenever the subject of mental illness comes up here, the reactions are strong and perplexing. Some, oddly, seem fiercely protective of mental illness itself, I don't know how else to describe it. It's strange.

I mean, there was nothing strange or sinister about that story at all. It was just the story of a sick child and her desperate, suffering parents. The illness happened to be schizophrenia, and the only way to treat that is with strong drugs, that nobody wants to give to a child. But what is the alternative? Let 400 The Cat tell Jani to jump out the window?


Move into a one-story house, for starters.

I see what you mean. I feel that way too about some similar stories and the responses here but the primary problem with diagnosing a child of that age with schizophrenia is that from a psychological, psychiatric, developmental or educational perspective a kid that age is simply not at all developed yet. Nor is her brain. Couple that with the fact that Eli Lilly et all are literally right in the middle of a very, very aggressive push to market anti-psychotics to kids, well, there is no longer anything remotely un-strange or un-sinister about the story.

Even if she is legitimately so afflicted, this story 100% serves as an emblem in favor of the disgusting cause of mainstreaming the use of anti-psychotic pharma on kids.
"What's robbing a bank compared with founding a bank?" Bertolt Brecht
User avatar
lightningBugout
 
Posts: 2515
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2008 3:34 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Fresno_Layshaft » Tue Jun 30, 2009 1:11 am

lightningBugout wrote:
Move into a one-story house, for starters.

I see what you mean. I feel that way too about some similar stories and the responses here but the primary problem with diagnosing a child of that age with schizophrenia is that from a psychological, psychiatric, developmental or educational perspective a kid that age is simply not at all developed yet. Nor is her brain. Couple that with the fact that Eli Lilly et all are literally right in the middle of a very, very aggressive push to market anti-psychotics to kids, well, there is no longer anything remotely un-strange or un-sinister about the story.

Even if she is legitimately so afflicted, this story 100% serves as an emblem in favor of the disgusting cause of mainstreaming the use of anti-psychotic pharma on kids.



I don't think heavy duty drugs should be pushed on kids either, but for a child so severely afflicted, there is little alternative. The article didn't over-emphasize the drug aspect of her story, it was slanted as a human interest piece. I don't think this specific article was a plant to push a drug agenda of any sort. Jani's case is hardly main-stream, and I don't think many people would view it as an instance in which miracle drugs cured her. The author made it clear that this is problem she'll deal with her entire life.
Nothing will Change.
User avatar
Fresno_Layshaft
 
Posts: 320
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 9:06 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby justdrew » Tue Jun 30, 2009 1:19 am

Fresno_Layshaft wrote:The responses to this article are pretty creepy. Whenever the subject of mental illness comes up here, the reactions are strong and perplexing. Some, oddly, seem fiercely protective of mental illness itself, I don't know how else to describe it. It's strange.

I mean, there was nothing strange or sinister about that story at all. It was just the story of a sick child and her desperate, suffering parents. The illness happened to be schizophrenia, and the only way to treat that is with strong drugs, that nobody wants to give to a child. But what is the alternative? Let 400 The Cat tell Jani to jump out the window?


I know there's that risk but I don't think we're over reacting. This seems over the line. I just don't accept that she "has" any such disease as schizophrenia. There is a serious sleep disorder present and the article says nothing about treatment for that. As for the imaginary characters, she's a bright highly imaginative kid, and everything around her is reinforcing their expression/validity, and become a handy excuse for having acted out poorly controlled impulses.

what she needs is a steady stream of friendly adults to talk to and help structuring her creative output, keep her busy drawing and making stories and building. It seems like the environment is not right and I think she'd be far better off in a different environment, with more people around who will engage with her rather than 'deal' and 'cope' with her. but I've no idea how she and her family can get to that place, wherever it is.
User avatar
justdrew
 
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: unknown
Blog: View Blog (11)

Postby Maddy » Tue Jun 30, 2009 1:42 am

I'm highly skeptical of this diagnosis as well, and extremely concerned about the over-medication. There are many mental illnesses which cross-diagnose with symptoms of schizophrenia:

The first signs of schizophrenia typically emerge in the teenage years or early twenties, often later for females.


Well, they did say that only 1 in 30-50,000 get schizophrenia in childhood.

No one symptom positively identifies schizophrenia. All of the symptoms of this illness can also be found in other mental illnesses.


The symptoms of schizophrenia are generally divided into three categories -- Positive, Negative, and Cognitive:

Positive Symptoms, or "psychotic" symptoms, include delusions and hallucinations because the patient has lost touch with reality in certain important ways. "Positive" refers to having overt symptoms that should not be there. Delusions cause individuals to believe that people are reading their thoughts or plotting against them, that others are secretly monitoring and threatening them, or that they can control other people's minds. Hallucinations cause people to hear or see things that are not present.

Negative Symptoms include emotional flatness or lack of expression, an inability to start and follow through with activities, speech that is brief and devoid of content, and a lack of pleasure or interest in life. "Negative" does not refer to a person's attitude but to a lack of certain characteristics that should be there.

Cognitive Symptoms pertain to thinking processes. For example, people may have difficulty with prioritizing tasks, certain kinds of memory functions, and organizing their thoughts. A common problem associated with schizophrenia is the lack of insight into the condition itself. This is not a willful denial but rather a part of the mental illness itself. Such a lack of understanding, of course, poses many challenges for loved ones seeking better care for the person with schizophrenia.

Schizophrenia also affects mood. While many individuals affected with schizophrenia become depressed, some also have apparent mood swings and even bipolar-like states. When mood instability is a major feature of the illness, it is called schizoaffective disorder, meaning that elements of schizophrenia and mood disorders are prominently displayed by the same individual. It is not clear whether schizoaffective disorder is a distinct condition or simply a subtype of schizophrenia.


I come away from the article questioning the psychiatrist/s as well as the parents. I also have the vague feeling that something more may be happening with that child to set her off so severely, that they aren't seeing. Of course I'm not a therapist, and I don't know the situation personally. But even the description for "early onset schizophrenia" makes me question it, just from reading the article.

Many of the symptoms seen in people with schizophrenia are also found in people with depression, bipolar disorder, or other illnesses. As a result, studies have found that misdiagnosis is common. This is particularly true with children and adolescents. As such, it is extremely important to rule-out other diagnoses such as depression, bipolar disorder, and substance use before making a diagnosis of schizophrenia.


Medicines in that cocktail they were feeding her are used for bi-polar disorder. Her hyperactiveness also reminds me of bi-polar disorder as well, rather than schizophrenia.

Just thinking aloud.

What bothers me, I think, is what and how she's naming these things which are haunting her. For some reason that's where the 'creepy' comes in for me. Makes me wonder.
Be kind - it costs nothing. ~ Maddy ~
User avatar
Maddy
 
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:33 am
Location: The Borderlands
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby lightningBugout » Tue Jun 30, 2009 1:59 am

Well, I feel like I am letting myself getting sucked into that Martian missive's language but, for starters, while I don't know what this family needs, I strongly intuit that Drew's on the right track.

Um, let's see. Ok.

For starters.

What does Jani eat? Where does she live? City/Country? Has she been entirely thoroughly worked up for issues related to, say, metabolism and thryroid. Have the parents experimented with a 100% elimination diet in which each food and drink is gradually and clearly re-introduced to determine effect? Has she seen a naturopath? A chinese herbalist? A Reiki healer? A homeopath? Does the family live in any unusual proximity to powerstations or transfomers / all manner of point source pollutant? Or did the mother during gestation? What about exercise? Gestalt therapy? A shaman? Has the home been entirely thoroughly tested for lead and all manner of domestic pollutant. Um, let's see. What else? Get it?

The point is not, in any way, some sort of soft anti-allopathic condemnation of the category of mental illness, it is the point that the narrative is structured entirely in such a way that this must be the only solution (and face it, its not working very well). If I were this parent, I'd say - our culture is completely and totally bankrupt and fucked and I love my child and I will do anything to help her.

The point is this - what we accept as a control in this country is pretty much all aspects of society and culture. You can be sedentary and eat basically plastic (looked at a cheeto recently?) and drink up all the Chromium 6 in LA county water, etc. etc. etc. And that is just fine to most allopathic docs. All of these sorts of things are not considered to have substantial effect (despite the incredible and yet very common stories of hundreds of thousands of people who have cured themselves of all sorts of disease through nutrition and the research that supports them -- anyone reading this go out and but The China Study on nutrition ASAP) yet there is a perverse willingness to administer to the most vulnerable child a class of drugs that will someday be seen as slightly less sophisticated than medieval barbery and leeches.

As for this

layshaft wrote:The article didn't over-emphasize the drug aspect of her story, it was slanted as a human interest piece. I don't think this specific article was a plant to push a drug agenda of any sort.


I'm not sure how to respond with the gravity this deserves. Doesn't this pretty much sum up what we are constantly trying to make sense of pretty much everyday here? How society and culture work. IE we all know that (or lots of us at least) that there is something simply wrong with giving these drugs to kids. Yet we recognize that the piece itself is not written by an Eli Lilly agent. Yet the truth is still there - this piece appears in the LA Times at a moment when the major drug companies are trying to normalize this kind of RX. And despite intention, even if the case is extreme, the story really could serve as a heartbreaking defense of said RX. How does this work? Most of us don't seem to subscribe to the level of direct action and agency that Hugh, for example, does. But then most of us would not choose what you have, which is to basically say its a coincidence that the LAT decided to run this very story at this very moment (and I note that they have given this story a lot more photographs than they usually would for a similarly important story).

I dunno.

But to be clear -- all of my criticism is meant in support of this girl and her family.
"What's robbing a bank compared with founding a bank?" Bertolt Brecht
User avatar
lightningBugout
 
Posts: 2515
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2008 3:34 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby justdrew » Tue Jun 30, 2009 2:10 am

LBO - I wouldn't be surprised to find out the family is on the drug company administered hardship program and getting free or discount drugs. Which would put the case on the drug companies radar, and who's to say one of their reps didn't somehow help point the reporter at the family. Of course there is at this time no evidence for that, and... I'm not 100% sure the story helps drug companies agenda either.
User avatar
justdrew
 
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: unknown
Blog: View Blog (11)

Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 176 guests