Robert Steele on 9/11

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Robert Steele on 9/11

Postby jingofever » Wed Sep 02, 2009 4:40 pm

He doesn't leave out anything:

9/11 was created by Al Qaeda at the urging and with the financing of the Pakistani ISI (radical half). But they got frightened when it looked like it not only might work, but that Al Qaeda, which has previously promised to bring a nuclear event to the USA, had the brains to suggest putting one of the airplanes into a nuclear power plant. Pakistan briefed Cheney…nations also got wind of this and warned the CIA. We also had two walk-ins to the FBI, one in Orlando, one in Newark, that were dismissed by the FBI because the names were all virgins and not in the FBI data base—the arrogance of stupid bureaucracy.

Cheney saw an opportunity for what Bush called his trifecta, and gave it to him by giving the go-ahead to ISI and Al Qaeda, and ordering up a terrorism exercise that allowed him to send all relevant close-in air defense strip alert craft away from the target areas, and to disable the NORTHCOM normal response to flight path diversion. We still need to investigate degree to which US may have trained some of the terrorists; the degree to which the terrorists may or may not have actually been on the airplanes, and whether or not the two NYC planes also had embedded flight controls taken over and controlled from WTC 7. The pancaking of three buildings, one of which was not hit, I put down to Larry Silverstein, not Dick Cheney, warned by Mossad and with Goldman Sachs and the rest of the NYC Jewish mafia. An opportunity to solve his asbestos problem and make 7 billion surely shared with the insurance executive who had to be in on the scam to ignore all the thermite and the evidence. Giuliani destroyed the crime scene with trucks and GPS prearranged. The Pentagon was hit by a missile and conveniently went into both a construction area while also (it is claimed) destroying all the computers containing all the evidence needed to track down the missing 2.3 trillion Rumsfeld was being grilled about on the Hill on 10 Sept.


Robert Steele has been discussed here before. He's the open source intelligence guy and, of course, a former CIA officer.
User avatar
jingofever
 
Posts: 2814
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 6:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby bks » Wed Sep 02, 2009 5:29 pm

The Pentagon was hit by a missile


Pass.

The pancaking of three buildings, one of which was not hit, I put down to Larry Silverstein, not Dick Cheney, warned by Mossad and with Goldman Sachs and the rest of the NYC Jewish mafia.


Double pass.

Paging David Shayler. . .
bks
 
Posts: 1093
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:44 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby StarmanSkye » Wed Sep 02, 2009 6:15 pm

Guiliani destroyed the crime scene? And why does Steele allege the planes were controlled from WTC 7? It's just as feasable to control them in an Air Force base thousands of miles away -- no direct sight is necessary.

So is Steele sprading disinfo, muddying the waters with Mossad claims and impugning Silverstein as personally authorizing the siting of demo charges?

Very odd, because most of his info about the drug-war, war-profiteering nexus of corporations, crime cartels, banks and Pentagon are right-on, esp. exploiting instability for political and economic gain, etc. from previous reports he's made.

Another face of 911 as an unholy, baffling rabbithole.
StarmanSkye
 
Posts: 2670
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:32 pm
Location: State of Jefferson
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby 8bitagent » Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:54 pm

Poor Robert Steele. I think he read one too many "truther" books and tried to come up with some pop conspiratainment umbrella theory to marry them all. With of course, the rub: "al Qaeda came up with 9/11".

Also, is he mainly going off the story of Randly Glass meeting with an al Qaeda linked arms runner and a Pakistani ISI official in New York back in 1999?

Cheney, FWIW, sure has convinced himself that al Qaeda is real and that they are independently determined to strike us again. Actually, for 9/11 being an "inside job" allegedly, it's amazing how most of the government, agencies, etc are obsessed with the idea that "the Islamic terrorists could hit us again".

And come on Steele, some unified theory without Saudi Arabia? Im shocked!

I have watched the new documentary "National Security Alert"(about an hour and 20 minutes) which interviews a ton of first hand witnesses
all up and down the area around the Pentagon who swear up and down the plane flew completely to the left of where the official story places it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o&eurl

Seasoned cops, maintenence workers, even Pentagon employees all say the plane came completely to the left of the gas station and not to the far right where we are told it came in. I have no idea how to explain this.
So alas, as much as I believe Flight 77 plowed into the 77 foot Pentagon,
I can see why people have many questions about that particular event.
Last edited by 8bitagent on Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12249
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby barracuda » Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:57 pm

There is no such thing as a former CIA agent.
The most dangerous traps are the ones you set for yourself. - Phillip Marlowe
User avatar
barracuda
 
Posts: 12890
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby 8bitagent » Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:58 pm

barracuda wrote:There is no such thing as a former CIA agent.


You saying we can't completely trust Robert Baer and Michael Schuer? :)
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12249
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Strange coincidence?

Postby leobloom23 » Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:10 pm

Calling DreamsEnd...if you look on his schedule page :
We Demand Transparency
@ St. Marks Church in the Bowery
2nd Ave and E. 10th Street
9/12 and 9/13, 2009
isn't that where Jeremy and Theresa were staying when it all went pear shaped ?
leobloom23
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 11:15 am
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby elfismiles » Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:34 am

8bitagent wrote:I have watched the new documentary "National Security Alert"(about an hour and 20 minutes) which interviews a ton of first hand witnesses all up and down the area around the Pentagon who swear up and down the plane flew completely to the left of where the official story places it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o&eurl

Seasoned cops, maintenence workers, even Pentagon employees all say the plane came completely to the left of the gas station and not to the far right where we are told it came in. I have no idea how to explain this.
So alas, as much as I believe Flight 77 plowed into the 77 foot Pentagon,
I can see why people have many questions about that particular event.


@8bitagent - I stayed up late the other night watching this ... I shoulda been trying to go to sleep but this film really drew me in. It's pretty convincing ... at least it has convinced me that the official-myth version of the trajectory and path of the alleged impact-plane are extremely dubious at best.

I'm not saying their hypothesis of overflight is correct but it seems like they did a very good job of establishing that the official story completely contradicts the majority of witness testimony. Now I can believe that one or two witnesses were mistaken about certain elements regarding the events of that day or any other traumatic event. But in this case, as the film points out, ALL of these witnesses testimony conform with one-another and for them to each be mistaken would mean that each of them has completely revised their memory of WHICH DIRECTION THEY WERE FACING WHEN THEY SAW THE PLANE THAT DAY. Highly unlikely.

Again, I still don't agree with the conclusion that the film-makers jump to based on these witnesses testimony. The weakest link in their chain of witnesses is the final guy who worked in the Pentagon and claims to have seen a plane (THE plane in the filmmakers theory) flying away from the other side from the explosion site.

And the whole bit with the taxi-cab driver whose cab was impaled by the downed light pole is just ... well ... BIZARRE! I mean, obviously he is mistaken and confused about where he was that day but to then take his weird off-the-record (tho recorded on audio and video) comments about being a small fish in a plot with BIG WHALES is just ... a stretch.

Other than that I HIGHLY RECOMMEND this film to researchers.
User avatar
elfismiles
 
Posts: 8512
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (4)

Re: Robert Steele on 9/11

Postby elfismiles » Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:42 am

Whoa whoa WHOA!

JF, did you hand transcribe your quote below? Or did you cut and paste?

jingofever wrote:He doesn't leave out anything:

9/11 was created by Al Qaeda at the urging and with the financing of the Pakistani ISI (radical half). But they got frightened when it looked like it not only might work, but that Al Qaeda, which has previously promised to bring a nuclear event to the USA, had the brains to suggest putting one of the airplanes into a nuclear power plant. Pakistan briefed Cheney…nations also got wind of this and warned the CIA. We also had two walk-ins to the FBI, one in Orlando, one in Newark, that were dismissed by the FBI because the names were all virgins and not in the FBI data base—the arrogance of stupid bureaucracy.

Cheney saw an opportunity for what Bush called his trifecta, and gave it to him by giving the go-ahead to ISI and Al Qaeda, and ordering up a terrorism exercise that allowed him to send all relevant close-in air defense strip alert craft away from the target areas, and to disable the NORTHCOM normal response to flight path diversion. We still need to investigate degree to which US may have trained some of the terrorists; the degree to which the terrorists may or may not have actually been on the airplanes, and whether or not the two NYC planes also had embedded flight controls taken over and controlled from WTC 7. The pancaking of three buildings, one of which was not hit, I put down to Larry Silverstein, not Dick Cheney, warned by Mossad and with Goldman Sachs and the rest of the NYC Jewish mafia. An opportunity to solve his asbestos problem and make 7 billion surely shared with the insurance executive who had to be in on the scam to ignore all the thermite and the evidence. Giuliani destroyed the crime scene with trucks and GPS prearranged. The Pentagon was hit by a missile and conveniently went into both a construction area while also (it is claimed) destroying all the computers containing all the evidence needed to track down the missing 2.3 trillion Rumsfeld was being grilled about on the Hill on 10 Sept.


Robert Steele has been discussed here before. He's the open source intelligence guy and, of course, a former CIA officer.


Did YOU change that wording or was it like that originally?

Here is the way the page is now...

What exactly is your take on 9/11?

9/11 was created by Al Qaeda at the urging and with the financing of the Pakistani ISI (radical half). But they got frightened when it looked like it not only might work, but that Al Qaeda, which has previously promised to bring a nuclear event to the USA, had the brains to suggest putting one of the airplanes into a nuclear power plant. Pakistan briefed Cheney…nations also got wind of this and warned the CIA. We also had two walk-ins to the FBI, one in Orlando, one in Newark, that were dismissed by the FBI because the names were all virgins and not in the FBI data base—the arrogance of stupid bureaucracy.

Cheney saw an opportunity for what Bush called his trifecta, and gave it to him by giving the go-ahead to ISI and Al Qaeda, and ordering up a terrorism exercise that allowed him to send all relevant close-in air defense strip alert craft away from the target areas, and to disable the NORTHCOM normal response to flight path diversion. We still need to investigate degree to which US may have trained some of the terrorists; the degree to which the terrorists may or may not have actually been on the airplanes, and whether or not the two NYC planes also had embedded flight controls taken over and controlled from WTC 7. The pancaking of three buildings, one of which was not hit, I put down to Larry Silverstein, not Dick Cheney, warned by Mossad and with Goldman Sachs and the rest of the NYC Wall Street mafia. An opportunity to solve his asbestos problem and make 7 billion surely shared with the insurance executive who had to be in on the scam to ignore all the thermite and the evidence. Giuliani destroyed the crime scene with trucks and GPS prearranged. The Pentagon was hit by a missile and conveniently went into both a construction area while also (it is claimed) destroying all the computers containing all the evidence needed to track down the missing 2.3 trillion Rumsfeld was being grilled about on the Hill on 10 Sept.

Steele Speaks at WDT!
2 PM Sunday, Sept. 13
Robert Steele (former CIA agent, expert on Open Source Intelligence) As a part of our day-long focus on "Economics, Intelligence, and Transparency"
Full schedule here
http://www.wedemandtransparency.com/schedule.html

http://www.wedemandtransparency.com/steele.html


And thank you LB23 for noting the Theremy locale on Steele's lecture tour.
User avatar
elfismiles
 
Posts: 8512
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (4)

Postby bks » Fri Sep 04, 2009 12:28 pm

It said "Jewish" at http://www.wedemandtransparency.com/steele.html

I quoted it from there.
bks
 
Posts: 1093
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:44 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Robert Steele on 9/11

Postby jingofever » Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:08 pm

elfismiles wrote:Whoa whoa WHOA!

JF, did you hand transcribe your quote below? Or did you cut and paste?


Cut and paste, as bks confirms. Nice job catching that.
User avatar
jingofever
 
Posts: 2814
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 6:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby StarmanSkye » Fri Sep 04, 2009 6:02 pm

Re: "National Security Alert" vid about the 13 or so witnesses who claim to have seen the plane fly in on a more northerly path than in the official account. It is SURE an eye-opener alright. I haven't seen this before, tho I recently watched an account by the same filmakers interviewing cabbie Lloyds, whose account is far too confusing to be credible. I have a hard time seeing how the cab and pole incident could have been staged so publicly. I also have trouble with Arlington Cemetary worker Darius Praither who claimed the plane flew about 3 FEET above the Navy Annex building -- this is just too implausable to be believed and I'm surprised the interviewer didn't question him about it -- Not only is such a low flight practically impossible, but the exhaust and turbulence would have damaged the building's roof at the very least.

But it makes me wonder whether a flyby was possible, timed to coincide with a supersonic missile rigged to feign a fuel-explosion. Certainly the inconsistent evidence of insufficient Pentagon facade damage and lack of aircraft debris has always troubled me about the Pentagon attack.

Like the WTC and Penn. crashes, I don't think we'll EVER have the full and complete skinny on what happened that day -- probably done on purpose as a way to discredit all investigations that contradict the official explanation of events.
StarmanSkye
 
Posts: 2670
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:32 pm
Location: State of Jefferson
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby slimmouse » Fri Sep 04, 2009 6:13 pm

StarmanSkye wrote:Re: "National Security Alert" vid about the 13 or so witnesses who claim to have seen the plane fly in on a more northerly path than in the official account. It is SURE an eye-opener alright. I haven't seen this before, tho I recently watched an account by the same filmakers interviewing cabbie Lloyds, whose account is far too confusing to be credible. I have a hard time seeing how the cab and pole incident could have been staged so publicly. I also have trouble with Arlington Cemetary worker Darius Praither who claimed the plane flew about 3 FEET above the Navy Annex building -- this is just too implausable to be believed and I'm surprised the interviewer didn't question him about it -- Not only is such a low flight practically impossible, but the exhaust and turbulence would have damaged the building's roof at the very least.

But it makes me wonder whether a flyby was possible, timed to coincide with a supersonic missile rigged to feign a fuel-explosion. Certainly the inconsistent evidence of insufficient Pentagon facade damage and lack of aircraft debris has always troubled me about the Pentagon attack.

Like the WTC and Penn. crashes, I don't think we'll EVER have the full and complete skinny on what happened that day -- probably done on purpose as a way to discredit all investigations that contradict the official explanation of events.


Designed to deliberately cause confusion amongst the "physical evidence" people ( where in all truth there should be none - cos its as plain as the nose on yer face ) whilst obfuscating the real deep state connections in all the noise ?

Sounds like plain common sense to me.

Im wondering if our host ( brilliant last post btw) can see this ?

Im wondering if our host can see the clear connect between the MO of the JFK assassination - magic bullet and" all that crap "- and the collopse of 3 towers caused by two planes, even before we get to the pentagon lie.

Perhaps Im in a world of my own.

But I know that you know that they know that........

Oh and Mr Steele..........thanks for throwing "the joos dunnit" card ( prior to redaction) into the mix. That sure helps us all clear things up !
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)


Re: Beware

Postby slimmouse » Fri Sep 04, 2009 7:23 pm



Thanks for the warning.

Just out of interest, exactly what difference does this make to the whole "9/11 is a lie" idea ?

I mean, after all, we both know that the official story is fulla shit right ?

Oh and Mr Schroder, call me some kind of fucking idiot, but I saw the aftermath of the Pentagon crash, and wondered how the fuck could a plane do that.

I guess the "dont believe your own lying eyes" statement never ran more true.

But I digress..........as I said earlier......what difference does this make to the fact that 9/11 is a lie ?
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)

Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests