Honduras Coup: Soldiers kidnap VZ, Cuba, Nicaragua envoys

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Postby John Schröder » Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:08 pm

http://www.mayispeakfreely.org/index.ph ... doc_id=345

Honduras News in Review—August 2009

1. U.S. suspends all nonhumanitarian aid to Honduras, refuses to recognize results of upcoming elections
2. August protests marked by government repression, violence
3. Protesters arraigned, campesinos detained
4. Judge suspended for setting protesters free on bail
5. Police offers reward for identifying "terrorists"
6. Inter-American Commission on Human Rights conducts investigative mission to Honduras
7. Independent international observer delegations visit Honduras, issue reports
8. Honduran human rights advocates take concerns to Washington
9. More Honduras human rights news in brief
10. Billy Joya addresses allegations of past human rights crimes
11. Congress delays passage of controversial military service bill
12. San José Accord stuck in neutral
13. Other countries respond to Honduran crisis
14. Deposed and de facto governments take counteractions
15. Chile orders 129 arrested for Pinochet-era human rights crimes


1. U.S. suspends all nonhumanitarian aid to Honduras, refuses to recognize results of upcoming elections

The U.S. State Department announced on Sept. 3 that it would stop all non-humanitarian aid to Honduras, totaling $30 million. It also said that "based on conditions as they currently exist"—namely, the de facto regime's failure to accept the San José Accord to end the crisis in Honduras—the United States would not recognize the results of the country's November presidential elections. The suspended aid includes $11 million in Millennium Challenge Account funds for the current fiscal year. The Millennium Challenge Compact has final determination of the disbursal of MCA funds, including $215 million in outlaying years, and will be meeting the week of Sept. 7 to make that decision. The aid, exclusive of the MCA funds, is the same as that which was "paused" previously. Assistant Secretary of State Philip Crowley said that the department was able to make this decision without yet calling the events of June 28 a military coup, and that it reserved the option to make that determination at a later date. With these latest moves, he said, "the de facto regime, they’re now in a box and they will have to sign on to the San José Accord to get out of the box." Deposed Presient Manuel Zelaya expressed his pleasure with the move. "With this decision of the United States, the countries of the Americas have formed a single bloc in condemning the coup." On Aug. 25, the U.S. State Department suspended the issue of new, nonresident visas to Hondurans; Crowley said that more visa suspensions would be made public shortly, including anyone who had taken part in or supported the coup. [La Prensa, 8/26/09; AP 8/29/09; State Department statement, 9/3/09; State Department daily briefing, 9/3/09; BBC 9/3/09]

Earlier in the month, leaders of the resistance movement met with U.S. Ambassador Hugo Llorens. While the agenda of the meeting was not disclosed, anonymous sources said that they had been asking the ambassador to transmit a plea for stronger support to his superiors in the State Department. [El Tiempo, 8/10/09] President Barack Obama also urged the restoration of “constitutional order” in Honduras during an Aug. 10 meeting in Guadalajara, Mexico, in a joint statement of North American presidents assembled there. Reiterating U.S. support for Zelaya and that the events of June 28 constituted a coup, he complained that "the same critics who say that the United States has not intervened enough in Honduras are the same people who say we are always intervening and the yanquis need to get out of Latin America." [El Tiempo, 8/10/09; Reuters, 8/10/09] Speaking from Brasilia, Brazil on Aug. 12, deposed Honduran President Manuel Zelaya called once again for stronger U.S. involvement in restoring order by putting more economic pressure on his country. The United States is Honduras’ largest trade partner, and though it has suspended $18 million in military-related economic aid, much of its aid was still flowing through the MCA, according to Alejandro Álvarez, vice-president of the Honduran Council on Private Enterprise. [AP, 8/12/09; La Tribuna, 8/4/09;]

2. August protests marked by government repression, violence

During the second month of the crisis in Honduras, protests—organized by the National Resistance Front Against the Coup d'Etat (FRN)—continued to be largely peaceful, but marked by episodes of violence and heavy police and military repression.

Aug. 5. Following a promise to crack down on protests, heavily armored police forces did just that, beating student protesters back with water canons and tear gas until they took shelter in the National Autonomous University of Honduras on Aug. 5. Héctor Clara Cruz, a photographer for the newspaper El Tiempo, was severely beaten by police forces while taking photos of another police officer beating a protester, and incapacitated for a week. The university, which had thus far kept its neutrality in the conflict, was widely considered a safe haven, as it had for years been off limits to the police. Nevertheless, the Cobra special police force followed the students in, throwing tear-gas canisters as they went. When university president Julieta Castellanos and other officials tried to mediate the situation, they were equally mistreated. Reports describe Castellanos being violently pushed to the ground. According to MISF associate producer Oscar Estrada, who has been reporting on events on the ground, this sequence of events has had the effect of radicalizing the formerly neutral leadership of the national university. [AFP, 8/5/09; Cofadeh, 8/6/09; Oscar Estrada report, 8/5/09; El Tiempo, 8/17/09]

Aug. 11. Largely peaceful demonstrations came together in downtown Tegucigalpa and San Pedro Sula on Aug. 11. Roughly 20,000 people showed up in Tegucigalpa, including former Zelaya administration ministers and the deposed president's wife, daughter and mother. Additionally, campesinos from all corners of the country joined in the protests, many having traveled, some on foot, hundreds of miles to get there. The official speakers protested the interim government’s delay in reaching a mediated agreement, and said that as they time went on, pressure would intensify. Then, as the formal protest was winding down and many of the participants were heading back to the National Pedagogical University for a strategy meeting, a protester was shot and injured by a police officer. The reported reason for the shooting and accounts of the subsequent chain of events vary drastically, but ultimately vandals set fire to a public-transit bus and a Popeye's fast-food restaurant, a franchise owned by a major coup-funding family. The bus driver and passengers were safely evacuated, and no injuries resulted from either fire. Police arrested three protesters in connection with the crime (see story below), but resistance leaders have alleged that the vandalism was caused not by demonstrators but by provocateurs inserted to discredit the movement. Because of the violence, the interim government decreed a curfew in Tegucigalpa for that evening. [El Tiempo, 8/12/09; El Tiempo, 8/12/09 La Tribuna, 8/12/09; La Tribuna, 8/12/09]

Aug. 12. The outbreak of vandalism on Aug. 11, which elicited a further surge of police repression, in turn encouraged more people to participate in a protest rally Aug 12. A group of youth identified Congressional Vice President Ramón Velázquez Nazzar, who has been vocally contemptuous of protesters, and started to beat him up, and shortly thereafter were beat up themselves by the military. This incident sparked nationwide repression on behalf of the police and military, including a new overnight curfew. Alba Ochoa, coordinator for the Green Forest Development Foundation, was arrested for filming a police officer beating a young man with a metal tube in the aftermath of the protest. She said she was beaten, denied water, threatened and detained for “seditious acts,” even though she had not taken part in the protest. [Revistazo, 8/15/09; Cofadeh, 8/12/09; Oscar Estrada report, 8/12/09; La Tribuna, 8/12/09]

While beatings continued, a military unit broke into the pedagogical university gardens, which were serving as headquarters for the FRN, and started beating students and professors gathered there to receive the protesters after the march. The army, having learned from its incursion in the national university, didn't access the buildings but rather threw tear gas into the building, arresting all those who streamed out. The Committee for Relatives of the Detained-Disappeared (COFADEH) reported that Alex Matamoros, member of the Center for Investigation and Promotion of Human Rights, who wore a badge identifying his role as a human rights defender, was forcibly arrested and detained when he tried to intervene in the roundup of José Elcer Sabillón, a student who was in a study session at the time of the raid. Matamoros and nine others were released at 3:45 the following morning, after COFADEH and other human rights organization kept a vigil for these individuals held without charge. [Editor's note: the COFADEH report dates these events on Aug. 11, but they coincide with other reports of Aug. 12.] That same evening, police and military bomb units, acting on a tip, found some 12 to 20 (reports vary) molotov cocktails and other explosives in the buildings of the pedagogical university. Officially, these bombs have been used as evidence of the resistance movement's violent intent, but a report from MISF's Estrada indicates that the FRN leadership had actually confiscated the explosives from the backpack of a suspected police infiltrator. The National Police alleged that the bombs were being manufactured in the Chemistry and Pharmacy Building on the National Autonomous University campus by two radical student groups. University President Castellanos roundly rejected the allegations, saying that only a handful of faculty members had access to the building, which has been closed since an accident there a year ago and protected by private security personnel since that time. [Cofadeh, 8/12/09; Oscar Estrada report, 8/12/09; La Tribuna, 8/12/09; La Tribuna, 8/12/09; La Tribuna, 8/13/09; photos of protest: Cofadeh]

Aug. 14. The FRN orchestrated a takeover of a highway in Puerto Cortés, en route from San Pedro Sula to the nearby town of Choloma, on Aug. 14. Police Capt. Héctor Iván Mejía, in charge of local operations, had cleared the temporary takeover until noon and stated so publicly on Radio Globo. Despite these assurances, the full strength of the 200-member police force came down on the protesters at 11 a.m., tear-gassing them, beating them with batons and arresting 21, including three reporters covering the story: Julio Umaña, videographer for Diario Tiempo; Gustavo Cardoza, reporter for Radio Progreso, who was broadcasting live as he was beaten; and Edwin Castillo, reporter for the online news sites Honduras News and El Escamoso. Umaña and Castillo's video equipment were eventually returned when all 21 were freed later in the day, but the footage had been erased. [El Tiempo, 8/14/09; Honduras Laboral/Comun Noticias, 8/14/09; Honduras Laboral, 8/14/09; Honduras Laboral, 8/14/09; Honduras Laboral, 8/14/09; Honduras Laboral, 8/14/09; Oscar Estrada report, 8/15/09]

Irma Villanueva, who participated in the protest, later gave an account to Radio Progreso of four police officers taking her away from the scene of the protests and taking turns raping her in a police pick-up truck before leaving her unconscious in a field. She recalled the names of three of the officers as Ortiz, López and Chepe Luis. [Huffington Post (includes links to broadcast and transcription), 8/24/09]

3. Protesters arraigned, campesinos detained

Two dozen detained protesters, identified in some press reports as "terrorists," went before judge Esteban Quevedo on Aug. 15 in the upper reaches of the Preliminary Prosecutor's building, an unmarked, closed-door institution that human rights groups have accused of operating in a quasi-clandestine manner. Charges against the detainees included robbery, illegal assembly, damages to property and sedition. The Committee for Relatives of the Detained-Disappeared alleged that the proceedings were a premeditated strategy of legal intimidation. Defense lawyers for the detainees reportedly did not have access to their clients and only learned of the charges moments before the hearing took place. Depending on the account, 12 to 14 of the protesters were set free on bail, including Alba Ochoa, coordinator for the Green Forest Development Foundation (see story above). The remaining detainees—campesinos and one Colombian-Venezuelan national—were sent to the National Penitentiary due to lack of arraigos, literally "rooting," "influence" or "real estate," but having a specific legal context in Honduras as proof of good citizenship with stable work and family, which is hard for a field worker to prove. The lawyers for the defense argued, unsuccessfully, that they didn't have time to prepare arraigos. They also said there was physical evidence that the detainees were being cruelly and inhumanely treated. Regina Fonseca of the Women's Rights Center, who was present at the hearing, and said, "This was a political trial, they are the first political prisoners [in this conflict] and political prisoners because they are poor." The resistance movement marched on Aug. 18 to demand that the captives be released. [Revistazo, 8/15/09; El Heraldo, 8/18/09; El Tiempo, 8/19/09; Oscar Estrada report, 8/15/09]

4. Judge suspended for setting protesters free on bail

The presiding Tegucigalpa court judge was suspended by the Supreme Court on Aug. 16 for provisionally freeing three men accused of terrorist acts and aggravated arson. The three men—Dagoberto Andrade, Juan Antonio Guevara Vásquez, and José Antonio Flores Meza—whom Judge Maritza Arita Herrera released on bail on Aug. 13, were arrested after allegedly setting fire to a bus and a Popeye's fast-food restaurant two days earlier. The men had been participating in a demonstration by supporters of ousted President Manuel Zelaya. Some 50 people were arrested Aug. 11 and 12 for acts of vandalism in connection with the protests; protestors claimed that police had cracked down hard on the initially peaceful demonstration and alleged the presence of infiltrators who wreaked havoc in an attempt to discredit their movement. Arita Herrera said she had released the men pending an investigation "to ensure the presence of the accused in the process." She has since submitted a claim with the Committee for Relatives of the Detained-Disappeared, saying she is being subject to political persecution and a campaign to smear her public image. In addition to the court suspension, she has been accused in the media of partiality due to the political stance of her husband, public prosecutor Jari Dixon, who has spoken publicly in support of Zelaya and also was one of the leaders of a 2008 hunger strike protesting corruption in the judiciary (see HNR April '08 edition). A number of death threats against Herrera have been posted in the comments sections of a few newspaper Web sites. Arita Herrera pointed out that although she has been censured and criticized for the judgment she made, that judgment has not been reversed. "Their only recourse has been to publicly denigrate me," she said. [La Tribuna, 8/13/09; La Prensa, 8/14/09; La Tribuna, 8/17/09; Defensores En Linea, 8/17/09]

5. Police offers reward for identifying "terrorists"

Police commissioner Danilo Orellana, coordinator for the National Police's "Peace and Democracy" taskforce, announced on Aug. 17 that the agency was offering a reward for information leading to the identification of anyone involved in "terrorists" acts or vandalism that had occurred in recent weeks. The amount of the reward was not specified. Orellana said the accused would be categorized as authors, co-authors, accomplices or instigators, but all would be treated as members of illegal associations, a charge that carries a 15- to 20-year prison sentence. [La Tribuna, 8/18/09]

6. Inter-American Commission on Human Rights conducts investigative mission to Honduras

A 13-member delegation of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights was in Honduras from Aug. 17 to 21 to collect and verify reports of human rights abuses. IACHR Executive Secretary Santiago Cantón said of the mission, “We didn’t come to verify whether there’s been a coup—the OAS already determined that on July 4—but rather to verify the state of human rights in the context of the coup.” [La Tribuna, 8/16/09] The commission set up investigative panels in various parts of the country, where aggrieved citizens lined up to set forth complaints, telling stories of brutal beatings and providing X-rays of their injuries. [La Tribuna, 8/19/09; El Tiempo, 8/20/09]

During the course of its visit, the commission expanded its watch list to over 100 people to whom the government should offer special protection, including officials in the Zelaya government, resistance leaders and human rights advocates. [La Tribuna, 8/16/09] At the same time, in an apparent effort to show the rule of law existed, the Public Ministry put in motion the first trial of military men accused of human rights violations. The two naval officers were accused of illegally detaining a man in Trujillo, Colón with insufficient motive. [El Tiempo, 8/20/09]

The IACHR released a preliminary report of the delegation's findings on Aug. 21. Among other things, it expressed concern about the active role the Army has had in civilian life, including participation in controlling demonstrations. The report also details specific violations of human rights in its various forms, verifying a great deal of the allegations that have been coming out of the country in the past two months, including multiple deaths, at least five disappearances, widespread media intimidation and censorship, thousands of arbitrary detentions, sexual abuse and at least one rape. De facto government officials have reportedly denied any wrongdoing. [El Tiempo, 8/24/09; El Tiempo, 8/22/09; El Tiempo, 8/22/09; IACHR preliminary report, 8/21/09]

7. Independent international observer delegations visit Honduras, issue reports

Article 19, an NGO that works to defend and promote freedom of expression, issued a report http://www.article19.org/pdfs/press/hon ... tement.pdf titled “Honduras: Early Warning Signs of an Impending Crisis,” dated July 29 and based on its recent fact-finding mission to the country. Key findings include a high level of media polarization; violence and insecurity concerns for reporters and citizens; censorship and violence against human rights defenders; and concern for freedom of political expression through demonstrations and marches. [ConexiHon, ed. 118]

The Observation Mission on the Human Rights Situation in Honduras, an independent international fact-finding team that conducted a visit to the country in July (see story in HNR July edition), released its final report on Aug. 7. The report establishes that the de facto government violated the human rights of citizens opposed to the coup, and includes a number of recommendations to the international community and the Honduran government. [Revistazo, 8/8/09]

Frank Larue, special U.N. rapporteur on freedom of expression, visited Honduras on Aug. 3 and 4, and subsequently issued a report of his findings. “I can affirm that freedom of expression to comment on daily issues, criticize the de fact government or to condemn the coup does not exist in Honduras,” he said, adding, “The human rights situation is progressively deteriorating.” The report details three “worrying phenomena”: free protest is not being allowed; the police are using excessive force and aren't keeping proper detention records; and videographers and photographers are specific targets of police aggression. The report also noted that the atmosphere in the country makes it hard to document human rights abuses, largely because of the lack of objective media. [ConexiHon, ed. 118]

A delegation organized by the nonprofit Global Exchange, which visited Honduras Aug. 7-15 to witness and accompany daily protests and report on the current human rights situation in the country, found that the country was under a "de facto state of siege." Delegation members personally witnessed police and military repression including "unprovoked tear gassing, arbitrary arrest, beatings, theft of property from demonstrators and their organizations, and possible use of provocateurs." They found that the international corporate media is "largely absent" and reporting is often "inaccurate and cursory," and that "an overwhelming number" of Honduran media are "biased, inflammatory, and favor the coup and its backers." Global Exchange published a full report including lists of findings and recommendations, along with photos and testimonies from injured Honduran demonstrators. [Report of Global Exchange Delegation to Honduras; August 7-15, 2009]

8. Honduran human rights advocates take concerns to Washington

Human rights advocates Reina Rivera, of the Center for the Investigation and Promotion of Human Rights (CIPRODEH) and Claudia Hermannsdorfer of the Center for Women's Rights (CDM) visited Washignton Aug. 6-9 to speak about rights abuses in Honduras since June 28. The women met with staff at the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, the State Department, the Honduran Embassy, and the Center for Justice and International Law to testify to the threats, intimidation and censorship of those who oppose the de facto government. Among other things, they expressed concern over the government-imposed curfew; the use of military force to occupy public institutions, communication and energy outlets; the military's staging of "micro-coups" to replace mayors with new representatives in more than 10 municipalities; and the lack of civil supervision, or oversight by the attorney general or human rights ombudsman, of military and police, including prevention of torture or abuse or oversight of prisons. Rivera and Hermannsdorfer, both attorneys who have been working on rights issues in Honduras for two decades, played roles in the investigation and prosecution of human rights crimes committed by Honduran security forces during the 1980s. Hermannsdorfer described the ongoing worry of many Honduran citizens that "not only was the president ousted, but democracy was ousted and all the progress we've made on human rights in the last 20 years has been lost. There are so many issues that haven't been resolved from the '80s and they are having consequences now." [MISF interview with Reina Rivera and Claudia Hermannsdorfer, 8/7/09]

9. More Honduras human rights news in brief

On Aug. 4, the National Telecommunications Commission issued an order to shut down Radio Globo and its 14 transmitter stations throughout the country, citing “sedition.” The radio station, recognized by a recent Global Exchange delegation (see above story) as the only one in the country that opposes the coup, continues to broadcast. [Defensora en Linea, 8/4/09; NarcoNews, 8/4/09]

The Stockholm Declaration Monitoring Group (G-16), which groups all the countries and agencies that make up a great deal of Honduras’ official development help, sent a written request to top law-enforcement officials in the country for an investigation into the reports of human rights abuses that have been coming out since June 28. [El Tiempo, 8/17/09; Revistazo, 8/14/09]

On Aug. 13, Lidiet Díaz, reporter for Radio Globo, was expelled from the Government House and prohibited from covering a swearing-in ceremony that de facto President Michelleti was conducting. Michelleti himself came out to yell at her to leave, an act that an El Tiempo photographer captured but was forced by security personnel to delete from his camera. [Honduras Laboral, 8/14/09]

Amnesty International issued a report on Aug. 19 accusing Honduran security forces of using beatings and mass arrests as punishment for ongoing protests in the country, and expressing concern about the intimidation of human rights defenders. The report is based on interviews and photos taken during and after police, aided by the military, broke up a peaceful protest in Tegucigalpa on July 30. [NY Times, 8/18/09]

Spanish judge Baltasar Garzón, best known for ordering the capture of former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet, arrived in Honduras on Aug. 23 to take part in a conference to ascertain what jurisdiction, if any, international courts have in pursuing human rights violations that have taken place since the June 28 coup. At the conference he said, “If investigation is impeded in one country, if it’s not possible to carry it out, if there is a palpable omission in the judicial bodies of that country, and if there is no protection for victims of the types of crimes that systematically target groups of people, there exists the obligation of helping and responding in the [International Criminal Court.]” [El Tiempo, 8/24/09; Xinhua, 8/26/09; El Tiempo, 8/26/09]

On Aug 23, masked gunmen threatened the lives of personnel at a transmission station of Canal 11, one of the few media outlets to maintain its objectivity since the coup. A human rights prosecutor will be investigating the case. In the same attempt, transmission facilities for Radio Globo, and Canal 36 Cholusat Sur, both openly anti-coup outlets, were damaged. [El Tiempo, 8/24/09; El Tiempo, 8/24/09; Hondudiario, 8/24/09]

Resistance leader and congressional deputy Marvin Ponce was hurt during a protest in the latter part of the month. From his hospital bed, he called it a desperate act from a government that “feels it has lost the battle against a populace that doesn’t accept it.” [El Libertador, 8/26/09]

U.N. General Assembly President Miguel D’Escoto proposed on Aug. 28 that the Council on Human Rights assign a special rapporteur on human rights to Honduras. [Hondudiario, 8/29/09]

10. Billy Joya addresses allegations of past human rights crimes

In a New York Times interview, Billy Joya, a former Honduran police captain who has assumed a role as security adviser in the Micheletti cabinet, denied participating in human rights crimes during the 1980s but said he would have, if ordered to do so. Joya is accused of the illegal detention, torture and murder of civilians in the 1980s, when he was a commanding officer in the military intelligence Batallion 3-16. “It was never my responsibility to detain people, to torture people or to disappear people,” Joya said. “But if those had been my orders, I am sure I would have obeyed them, because I was trained to obey orders.” In an interview with MISF in 2000, however, Joya did admit to participating in the 1982 detention of six university students, accused of terrorist acts, who were illegally held and tortured. In the 1990s, Joya was charged with crimes in this and other cases of detention, torture and murder—a total of 27 charges—but has been acquitted on technicalities. [NY Times, 8/7/09]

11. Congress delays passage of controversial military service bill

On Aug. 18, congressional deputies called for a suspension of discussions about a proposed change to the military service law because of the tremendous controversy it was stirring during this time of crisis within the country. The bill, which was originally proposed while Manuel Zelaya was still in office, would have required a two-year mandatory service period once a person had signed up; military service would still be voluntary. Detractors of the legislation reportedly feared abuse of conscripts by superiors, since the law doesn't allow them to pull out due to abuse. Additionally, the bill would have inserted a provision for the president to enact a draft in times of crisis. Under the bill, passive "reserves"—meaning anyone of military age who hasn't served—could have been called up on the president's orders, and active reserves—those who had previously served—could have been called up for specific missions. [La Tribuna, 8/17/09; El Tiempo, 8/13/09; El Tiempo, 8/18/09]

12. San José Accord stuck in neutral

The month of August saw a lot of talk but very little movement on the San José Accord, the plan put forward by Costa Rican President Oscar Arias. The accord seemed to gain ground with a recommendation by a congressional panel that the amnesty proposal—one of the key points of contention—be accepted by the full Congress. [http://www.tiempo.hn/secciones/crisis-politica/1900-comision-legislativa-a-favor-de-aprobar-amnistia El Tiempo] On Aug. 12, a delegation from the Michelleti government traveled to Washington to meet with the Organization of American States to discuss the next steps in the accord negotiations. The delegation consisted of de facto Chancellor Carlos López Contreras, businessman and former presidential candidate Arturo Corrales, lawyer Mauricio Villeda and former Supreme Court President Vilma Morales. They returned optimistic, after having met with OAS Secretary General José Miguel Insulza. The meetings paved the way for the OAS mission that arrived later in the month and again after the OAS had left to talk about moving the accord further. [Hondudiario, 8/12/09; Hondudiario, 8/13/09; La Prensa, 8/26/09]

A fairly well organized campaign then ensued to take the momentum away from the accord just as the OAS mission was to arrive. First, the Supreme Court of Honduras issued comments on the accord in a nine-point document issued on Aug. 23, categorically opposing Zelaya's restitution and almost every other point in the accord, and citing and asserting the supremacy of Honduran law in the matter. The same day, Ramon Custodio, national commissioner for human rights, spoke out against Arias' role in the crisis, saying that it was "very negative," and that as a mediator, he should have found reconciliation between the parties. He also said Zelaya's return is unacceptable because a large part of the population is against it. On Aug. 25, Attorney General Luis Alberto Rubí also came out against the amnesty proposal, which he said would "tie the hands" of the Public Ministry. [El Tiempo, 8/24/09; El Tiempo, 8/24/09; El Tiempo, 8/24/09; Hondudiario, 8/25/09]

The OAS mission, initially delayed by a flap over the inclusion of Insulza in the delegation, arrived Aug. 24. Accompanying Insulza were the foreign ministers of Canada, Mexico, the Dominican Republic, Jamaica, Costa Rica, Panamá, and Argentina. Its agenda consisted of meetings with civil society groups, the National Congress, Public Ministry, electoral tribunal, Supreme Court, various religious authorities, and all presidential candidates. Ultimately, the mission ended in deadlock and mixed reactions. The president of the National Association of Industries, Adolfo Facussé, said the OAS delegation arrived with threats of U.S. sanctions if the interim government didn't reinstate Manuel Zelaya as president. On the other hand, Elvin Santos, Liberal Party presidential nominee, said that he was encouraged by his meeting with the delegation. [La Tribuna, 8/9/09; La Tribuna, 8/9/09; La Tribuna, 8/24/09; El Tiempo, 8/24/09; Voice of America News, 8/26/09; Hondudiario, 8/25/09; Hondudiario, 8/25/08]

Both the de facto and deposed presidents offered possible next steps in separate memoranda to Arias and the OAS. Michelleti offered to step down and have the Supreme Court president take over, but Zelaya called that proposal illegal since it wouldn't rectify the unconstitutionality of his ouster in the first place. Michelleti also offered that Zelaya come back in 2010 to face charges against him. Zelaya has allegedly sent Arias some new proposals, but they have not been revealed. [NY Times, 8/27/09; El Tiempo, 8/29/09; El Tiempo, 8/30]

13. Other countries respond to Honduran crisis

Other countries have been taking action against Honduras in the past month. Panama asked to be withdrawn from Central American Parliament on the week of Aug. 10, with Panamanian Chancellor Juan Carlos Varela citing the body’s inaction on the Honduran crisis in Honduras. The institution has come under attack in the past for supposedly harboring politicians who otherwise would be the object of prosecution. [El Tiempo, 8/10/09] On Aug. 17, the parliament of Mercosur—a regional trade agreement among Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay, with associate members Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru— condemned the coup in Honduras, and called for the restitution of the constitutional government of Manuel Zelaya. [El Tiempo, 8/18/09] After Manuel Zelaya dismissed the ambassador to Spain, José Eduardo Martell Mejía, on Aug. 5, Spain decided to pull his accreditation and ask him to leave the country on Aug. 17. Spain said the decision “was consistent with the international community’s agreement to maintain official ties with the constitutional government of Honduras,” meaning the Zelaya government-in-exile. [El Tiempo, 8/21/09] Dominican Republic President Leonel Fernández on Aug. 27 suggested that Honduras be temporarily expelled from the Dominican Republic-Central American Free Trade Agreement with the United States. “By just adopting this measure, Zelaya would be back in two to three months,” Fernández said. Former Panamanian President Martín Torrijos and others announced their immediate support for the proposal, while CAFTA negotiator for Honduras, Melvin Redondo, dismissed the idea, saying, “The accord doesn’t allow for unilateral suspension.” [El Tiempo, 8/27/09; El Tiempo, 8/27/09; Hondudiario, 8/30/09]

14. Deposed and de facto governments take counteractions

As the conflict lengthens, both the deposed and de facto governments are taking steps to gain standing. The Michelleti government has released arrest warrants for a number of former ministers under the Zelaya government. Zelaya himself is wanted for treason for allegedly trying to change the form of government via a constitutional assembly. Ousted minister of the presidency Enrique Flores Lanza is wanted, along with Zelaya, for abusing authority by signing allegedly illegal emergency decrees authorizing a campaign to support the opinion poll. Former Central Bank president Edwin Araque is accused of misusing his post for allegedly carting out money in wheelbarrows, as is former finance minister Patricia Rebeca Santos in authorizing that withdrawal. Others, including national energy and telecommunications heads, have also been charged with crimes. [La Prensa, 8/17/09] Meanhwile, the Zelaya government-in-exile has taken away diplomatic accreditation from roughly 20 diplomats. The Michelleti government has also withdrawn their support from 20 diplomats, four consuls in the United States and 16 elsewhere in the world. Because the international community only recognizes Zelaya as president, only diplomats accredited by him are recognized in-country. [El Heraldo, 8/17/09]

15. Chile orders 129 arrested for Pinochet-era human rights crimes

On Sept. 1, a Chilean judge issued indictments for 129 individuals accused of human rights crimes during the 1973-1990 dictatorship of Gen. Augusto Pinochet. The individuals, who range from chauffeurs to high-ranking police and military officers, are charged with the kidnapping, torture and assassination of leftist opponents; a reported 3,197 suspected leftists were killed for political reasons under Pinochet and another 30,000 people were tortured. In an interview with NPR, Peter Kornbluh, director of the Chile Documentation Project at the nonprofit National Security Archive in Washington, said, "This is a huge statement in the history of human rights judicial process … a statement that civilized countries don't close the chapter on human rights crimes of the past … and that countries will hold their leaders and their national security agents accountable for the types of crimes that were committed in Chile, in Argentina, for torture, disappearance, illegal detention. Certainly those are issues we're debating in the United States right now, of how to deal with the past." [CNN, 9/1/09; NPR, 9/2/09; Independent, 9/3/09]
User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:26 pm

Older, but still worthwhile.

http://www.mayispeakfreely.org/index.ph ... doc_id=344

Honduras News in Review—July 10-Aug. 3, 2009

1. Post-coup death toll rises
2. International human rights delegation observes "systematic violations of human rights"
3. Repression severe on Nicaraguan border as Zelaya supporters gather to meet exiled president
4. Protests in Tegucigalpa, other cities meet with violent police, military response
5. Human rights NGOs take action on behalf of detainees, at-risk citizens
6. U.S. State Dept. maintains guardedly pro-Zelaya stance
7. U.S. Congress divided on Honduras
8. Honduran Congress members "deliberately kept out of legislative session" that ousted Zelaya
9. Excerpt of July 21 letter from Manuel Zelaya to Barack Obama
10. Human rights ombudsman Ramón Custodio censured by international human rights advocates
11. San José Accord still on table, but conflicts loom large
12. Elite Honduran business interests flex behind-the-scenes power in de facto government
13. "Cuarta urna" proposals had raised hopes among Honduras' marginalized communities
14. Kidnapped journalist found dead
15. Other news in brief


1. Post-coup death toll rises

On July 25, fellow Zelaya supporters found the body of 23-year-old Pedro Magdiel Muñoz Salvador, notably bruised and stabbed 46 times, near a roadblock in El Paraiso. Muñoz had been among the approximately 5,000 supporters heading to the Nicaraguan border to greet deposed president Manuel Zelaya as he attempted to cross into the country. According to independent journalist and MISF associate producer Oscar Estrada, who has been sending daily updates of events on the ground, Muñoz had been part of a small group that had most actively challenged a police blockade in El Paraiso—one of 15 set up between Tegucigalpa and the border with Nicaragua. Muñoz allegedly had been arrested the previous evening, a claim that police officials denied. The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights called for an investigation into the murder, and urged the interim government to “adopt every measure to guarantee the right to life, integrity and security to all citizens of Honduras.”

The following day, Jorge Edgardo Cruz Sierra, 35, and Víctor Samuel Almendárez Fuentes, 12, were killed outside the National Stadium in Tegucigalpa after a soccer match. A third victim, Francisco Javier García Ortega, 45, died a few days later. Official reports attributed the deaths, along with at least five gunshot injuries, to a clash between rival fans that was subsequently subdued by police with tear gas and live ammunition. Some accounts said that the incident was provoked by gun-wielding fans who were waiting outside the stadium, as police had searched people on their way into the match. By contrast, Estrada suggested the police aggression was in response to crowd protests over the death of Muñoz and "the state of repression" in the country, not a soccer riot. According to Estrada, a block of fans had come into the game with a banner depicting Pedro Muñoz’s face; that section of the crowd was repeatedly skipped in the television coverage of the game, he noted. After what Estrada called “an extremely boring match,” which ended in a 0-0 tie, “the youth left protesting ... yelling, ‘Murderers! Murderers!’” Television reports and a video posted to YouTube showed a police officer firing into the crowd. On July 29, Orlin Javier Cerrato Cruz, spokesperson for the Ministry of Security, allowed for the possibility that one of the deaths could have been at the hands of an officer. “We need to look at all the evidence to be able to ascertain whether [a police officer] is responsible.”

On July 29, a 38-year-old teacher, Roger Abrahán Vallejo, was shot in the head by police during a protest in northern Tegucigalpa. Witnesses said the shooting occurred as hundreds of police charged a crowd of protesters. Vallejo died in hospital three days later. Teachers present at the Hospital Escuela, where Vallejo was being treated, reported the presence of police and military forces at the health-care facility. According to Sergio Rivera, a member of the Association of Secondary Teachers of Honduras, police "forced their way into the wounded leader's room ... to intimidate his companions." Police officials said were opening an investigation to determine whether the shot that killed Vallejo was fired by a police officer.

The first death directly tied to events related to the coup occurred on July 5, when Isis Obed Murillo, 19, was shot and killed when police fired into a crowd of Zelaya supporters awaiting the ousted president's arrival at the Tegucigalpa airport. Since then, several other killings have been reported, although reports have varied and it is unclear whether all are related to post-coup events. Nevertheless, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights has noted and requested clarifying information regarding the following six alleged murders (in addition to Muñoz): the death of journalist Gabriel Fino Noriega, Radio América correspondent in San Juan Puebla, Atlántida, killed on July 3 as he left the Radio América offices; the discovery of a body in "La Montañita" with apparent signs of torture and a T-shirt supporting the Zelaya administration's "cuarta urna" proposal; the discovery of two bodies in a barrel in Tegucigalpa, with money and cell phones still intact, and their arms bound with shoelaces; the July 11 murder of popular leader Roger Bados, in San Pedro Sula; and the July 12 murder of popular leader Ramón García, in Santa Bárbara. [AP, 7/25/09; Oscar Estrada report, 7/27/09; EFE, 7/28/09; La Tribuna, 7/29/09; El Tiempo, 7/29/09; IACHR press release, 7/27/09; La Tribuna, 7/27/09; HablaHonduras, 7/31/09; AFP, 8/2/09; La Jornada (Mexico), 8/2/09]

2. International human rights delegation observes "systematic violations of human rights"

A fact-finding team of 17 representatives from European and Latin American human rights organizations visited Honduras to observe the human rights situation first hand, releasing on July 23 a preliminary report of their findings. The Observation Mission on the Human Rights Situation in Honduras said it verified many reports of abuses earlier in the month, including at least six extrajudicial killings and two confirmed disappearances. There were a number of other murders that they did not have the time to verify, according to an AlterNet reporter writing from inside the country, who was told by a member of the mission that if they had “stayed longer, the numbers of political murders would be higher.” The mission's report also verified and documented many reported instances of press repression (see MISF 7/28 report) and also noted a credible report of paramilitary organizations, supposedly with drug trafficking connections, dressed in camouflage and acting in conjunction with the 15th Battalion of the Honduran Army in the Colón region. A final report from the mission is expected soon. On July 30, the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), one of the participating organizations, issued a statement of concern over the human rights situation in Honduras, urging that the international community continue to condemn the coup, that the European Union suspend economic cooperation with Honduras, and that the U.N. high commissioner conduct a field visit to the country, among other things. [International Observation Mission preliminary report, 7/23/09; AlterNet, 7/28/09; FIDH, 7/30/09]

3. Repression severe on Nicaraguan border as Zelaya supporters gather to meet exiled president

A group of observers from the United Nations arrived at the Honduran border with Nicaragua on July 27, where supporters of Zelaya had been congregating since July 24 to greet the deposed president, who had promised to cross the border there over the weekend. The delegation, strictly there to document human rights conditions, reported shortages of water and food for the inhabitants in areas affected by the round-the-clock curfew, which covered approximately one third of the country and ultimately lasted five days. They received reports of a Red Cross vehicle that was trying to make it through to an encampment of protesters with basic provisions, which was denied passage by a military roadblock.

Movement to the southern border was impeded by as many as 15 military roadblocks, which stopped the busloads of supporters, forcing them to walk. Independent journalist and MISF associate producer Oscar Estrada witnessed first-hand many of the events at the border, and reported that throngs of supporters joined Zelaya, despite being deprived of transportation. Via Ciudadana, an international campesino rights organization, reported that marchers were variously tear-gassed and shot at, resulting in at least three injuries. On July 25, news broke that Via Ciudadana leader Rafael Alegría had been arrested. Estrada and the group of reporters with whom he was traveling were able to locate Alegría, along with roughly 150 peaceful protesters, in the local jail. With the help of Juan Almendares, director of the Center for Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation of Torture Victims and their Families, Estrada and the reporters were able to secure Alegría’s release, as well as those of the women being held, who had complained of sexual harassment as well as threats of sexual abuse. The same day, popular leaders Bertha Cáceres and Salvador Zúniga, of Civic Council of Indigenous and Popular Organizations (COPINH), and Miriam Miranda, of the Garifuna organization OFRANEH, were also detained but subsequently released.

A report from women’s group Feministas en Resistencia substantiates a claim that at least one Honduras Red Cross vehicle was used to transport tear gas and arms to the barricades along the southern route. This has had the effect of undermining the trust local people have in the aid organizations generally and the Red Cross specifically. Although the Red Cross said they never sent a unit in that direction, they have not denounced the misappropriation of their symbol by government forces, nor have they made a formal complaint to appropriate authorities, according to the group. [Oscar Estrada report, 7/27/09; Via Ciudadana; Revistazo, 7/28/09; Feministas en Resistencia, 7/28/09]

4. Protests in Tegucigalpa, other cities meet with violent police, military response

Violent repression exploded on July 30 in the El Durazno section of Tegucigalpa, a day that union leader and National Front Against the Coup organizer Juan Barahona called “the fiercest repression we have experienced to date.” Many nonviolent protesters and bystanders were beaten, including independent presidential candidate Carlos Reyes, whose arm was broken, MISF associate producer Oscar Estrada, whose camera was destroyed and confiscated along with his footage and cell phone, and president of the Committee for the Defense of Human Rights (CODEH) Andrés Pavón. CODEH released a full account of their experience on the streets, reporting that disproportionate amounts of police and military forces were on hand, stopping buses full of people headed to El Durazno and briefly hijacking them, with helicopter support, to locations far from the protests. Some of these busloads were detained.

The protesters on hand were tear-gassed and beaten, seemingly at random. When one man who had stopped to take pictures was chased into his office, Pavón tried to intervene, stating his credentials. The police officer threatened him, calling human rights worthless and attempting to hit him with his baton. The account continued, “We bore witness to the disproportionate and beastly nature of the aggression. They were detaining the protesters, marching them down the street, single file, which recalled [a scene from] the Jewish ghettos.”

After being loaded onto trucks, the protesters were taken to the police’s Fourth Precinct or the Army’s Seventh Regional Command, where they joined over 100 detainees. By CODEH's count, at least 16 people were severely wounded, and one, Roger Abrahán Vallejo, killed by gunshot. (See top story.) Reports from Comayagua city yielded similar stories, with at least 100 detained, over 20 severely wounded, and gas canisters being thrown inside the cells. Similar reports from Copán city emerged from protests there the following day. The New York Times also reported clashes in at least four cities. [NY Times, 7/31/09; TeleSur, 7/30/09; (Editor's note: COFADEH reports will be posted to mayispeekfreely.org soon]

5. Human rights NGOs take action on behalf of detainees, at-risk citizens

In its legal capacity, CODEH made claims of habeas corpus for people detained in Tegucigalpa, Comayagua and Copán July 30 (see above story), only to be frustrated by judges who arrived after the detainees had been released without any intake or discharge records on file, leaving no evidence of the witnessed illegal detentions. CODEH has made four formal reports of human rights abuses to date, calling out numerous members of the de facto government for their roles in the events since June 28, including the previously reported state of exception decree, domestic media repression, and treatment of foreign diplomats.

According to an interview earlier in the month with Reina Rivera, former director of the Center for Investigation and Promotion of Human Rights, the military and the police are working in very close coordination, with the latter appearing to take orders from the former rather than checking its power in-country. She said that reports of disappearances are currently being verified, and that claims of forced military conscription, reported by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and others, have been followed by reports that these are now “voluntary,” due to pressure from NGOs.

On July 24, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights expanded its list of people granted precautionary measures “in order to safeguard the life and personal integrity of persons in Honduras, who, according to information received, are at risk.” The expanded list names scores of people, including journalists, union leaders, leaders of local NGOs and former government officials. The commission has also requested information on specific claims of murders, beatings, death threats, press repression and other forms of abuse. [MDZ Online, 7/11/09; Revistazo; Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Precautionary Measures 2009]

6. U.S. State Dept. maintains guardedly pro-Zelaya stance

On July 27, U.S. State Department spokesperson Ian Kelly restated the official U.S. stance on Honduras, saying, “We want the restoration of democratic order. And that includes the return by mutual agreement of the democratically elected president, and that’s President [Manuel] Zelaya.” U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has been more guarded in her assessment, omitting the last sentence regarding the return of Zelaya, saying, as she did on July 7, "We hope at the end of this mediation there will be a return of democratic constitutional order that is agreed to by all concerned. The exact nature of that, the specifics of it, we will leave to the parties themselves."

Despite having generally expressed a position against the interim government, the State Department has not legally declared the Zelaya's removal a coup d'etat, a position that Assistant Secretary of State Philip J. Crowley restated plainly in a July 20 briefing. Although the Obama administration and State Department have used the word "coup," it hasn't legally been declared such; clauses in the Foreign Assistance Act and Millennium Challenge Accounts call for the immediate termination of the flow of aid to a country in which a coup has "legally" taken place. At stake are $43.2 million in foreign aid slated for Honduras in 2009, including Millennium Challenge compact monies. There is $130 million left to be disbursed to Honduras under the Millennium Challenge through 2010. Over $20 million in military and police assistance and other aid programs have been suspended thus far, and $11 million in Millennium Challenge monies have yet to be authorized.

The argument for not cutting off aid has a humanitarian dimension—Honduras is one of the poorest countries in the Western Hemisphere, with the most extreme inequality in wealth distribution. Cutting off aid would mainly affect the roughly 5.2 million people living under the poverty line, and not necessarily those pushing for the coup. Those who favor a tougher stance echo the words of Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry, who said in a July 15 Miami Herald op-ed, "If those who overthrew Zelaya remain intransigent, we must look at additional cuts, without harming the poor more than Honduran politicians already have. In addition, we should consider pursuing punitive measures—including suspending travel visas—for anyone involved in suppressing the Honduran people."

Spokesperson Kelly also stressed the department’s desire to have both parties adhere to the mediation talks headed by Costa Rican President Oscar Arias. On July 28, the United States applied more pressure on the de facto government by revoking diplomatic visas for four of its officials: Tomas Arita Valle, the Supreme Court justice who signed the order for Zelaya's arrest; José Alfredo Saavedra, president of the Honduran Congress; human rights ombudsman Ramon Custodio; and Adolfo Lionel Sevilla, defense minister in the interim government. In a briefing that day, Kelly added that the State Department would further support the Zelaya government in this matter. “Once they submit the proper notification of termination on [Embassy diplomats and staff who support the de facto regime], the United States will take steps to terminate their status,” he said. [Miami Herald, 7/15; U.S. State Dept., 7/27/09; U.S. State Dept., 7/28/09; Reuters, 7/28; Business Week, 7/29]

7. U.S. Congress divided on Honduras

Meanwhile, in Congress, two starkly different resolutions on Honduras are competing for support. H. Res. 630—which Rep. Bill Delahunt, D-Mass., introduced July 10—"condemns the June 28 coup d'etat in Honduras and refuses to recognize the de facto Micheletti government installed by that coup d'etat.” It also specifically calls for Manuel Zelaya to be reinstated and for the Obama administration to suspend any non-humanitarian aid, which it has not done to the full extent possible. Democratic Rep. Raul Grijalva of Arizona, a co-signer of 630, has been circulating a letter addressed to President Barack Obama that cites human rights abuses and urges the United States to take further action against the de facto government, including a suspension of non-humanitarian aid and a freeze on bank accounts and assets of individuals involved in the coup. Grijalva said such actions would have no adverse effect on the people of Honduras, but would force the de facto government to “abandon its uncompromising stance.”

On the other hand, H. Res. 619, put forth July 8 by Rep. Connie Mack, R.-Fla., “condemns Mr. Jose Manuel Zelaya Rosales for his unconstitutional and illegal attempts to alter the Constitution of Honduras,” and calls the actions of June 28 legal and constitutional. Mack, who, along with his Republican colleague Rep. Brian Bilbray of California, returned from a July 25-26 weekend trip to the country, said Zelaya "is playing a game here and [Venezuelan President] Hugo Chavez is pulling the strings."

The bill supporters are currently engaged in a race for broader support, as 630 currently has 44 co-signers—mostly a liberal coalition of minorities and their supporters—while 619 has 41 co-signers—conservative Cuban exiles and their allies. [The Hill, 7/28/09; Huffington Post, 7/28/09; Library of Congress, H. Res. 619; Library of Congress, H. Res. 630; The Hill, 7/28]

8. Honduran Congress members "deliberately kept out of legislative session" that ousted Zelaya

A growing number of Honduran congressional deputies are speaking out against the coup and affirming that they did not participate in the June 28 vote—initially reported as nearly unanimous—to remove President Manuel Zelaya from office and instate Roberto Micheletti, the congressional president, in his stead. In a July 26 letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, a group of five representatives, including Copán deputy Elvia Valle, wrote, "We and other members of Congress were deliberately kept out of the legislative session which ousted President Zelaya. We were first informed that there would be no session that day, and a small group of us was notified that a session would be taking place at the very last minute, with full knowledge that we were then at great distances from the capital city." Honduran Ambassador to the U.S. Enrique Reina and Armando Sarmiento, former Director of the Dirección Ejecutiva de Ingresos/DEI (Honduran Tax and Customs Bureau), told MISF at least 26 deputies were not present for the vote, while another who was present did not provide a "yes" vote but was counted as such.

Those 27 representatives signed their names to a follow-up letter to the U.S. Congress on Aug. 3, denouncing the dismissal of Zelaya, the denial of due process to Zelaya, the prevention of their participation in the vote, and the use of "progressive and systematic" repression and intimidation tactics against deputies speaking out against the coup. Comprising 20 Liberal Party members, five from the Democratic Union Party, and two from the Christian Democracy Party, the group noted that they "represent a broad slice of the political spectrum in Honduras—from former close allies of Roberto Micheletti, the de facto head of state, to strong supporters of Preseident Zelaya's party and members of other political parties." The group wrote in its July 26 letter, "In our country the coup not only turned back time several decades, to an era when it was common practice for the military to overthrow presidents, but it also sent us back to a time when civil liberties were systematically violated in the name of national security." [MISF interview with Ambassador Enrique Reina and Armando Sarmiento; Honduran deputies' July 26 letter to Clinton and Aug. 3 letter to U.S. Congress (Editor's note: images of letters will be added to mayispeakfreely.org soon)]

9. Excerpt of July 21 letter from Manuel Zelaya to Barack Obama

"... I call upon the Honorable President Barack Obama to take concrete action aimed at restoring the constitutional order of the Republic of Honduras and ending the violations of human rights and the bloody repression of the people who are in the streets demanding justice by DECLARING the consequent state of emergency, prohibiting bank transactions and canceling the visas of the conspirators and those directly responsible for my absuction and the interruption of constitutional order in my country, designating them as "Specially Designated Persons" and adding them to the Executive Order 13224 of the United States of America, the following individuals: The High Command of the Armed Forces of Honduras presided over by Division General Romeo Vasquez Velasquez, head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and composed of Brigadier General Miguel Angel Garcia Padget, in his rank of General Commander of the Army, Commander General of the Navy, Rear Admiral Juan Pablo Rodriguez R., an Brigadier General Luis Javier Prince Suazo, Commander General of the Airforce; the directorate of the National Congress of Honduras presided over by Roberto Micheletti Bain, and composed of Jose Alfredo Saavedra, Toribio Aquilera, Ramon Velazquez Nassar, Marcia Facusse de Villeda, Rolando Dubon Bueso and Antonio Rivera Callejas; Attorney General Luis Alberto Rubi, and Public Prosecutor Rosa America Miranda." [Translation by Embassy of Honduras, Washington, D.C.; text provided to MISF by Honduran Ambassador Eduardo Enrique Reina]

10. Human rights ombudsman Ramón Custodio censured by international human rights advocates

A group of Latin American, North American and European human rights lawyers, in a July 1 letter to the Federation of Iberoamerican Ombudsmen (FIO), denounced Honduran Human Rights Commissioner Ramón Custodio for endorsing the coup and failing to defend human rights in the country. Custodio is the Honduran representative to the FIO. The letter called for an investigation into Custodio's actions and that he be urged to "fulfill his constitutional duty to defend and protect human rights, democracy and the rule of law because, with his actions and omissions, he has discredited and delegitimized the institutional figure of the ombudsman and the Iberoamerican Federation of Ombudsmen."

On July 27, Nicaraguan human rights prosecutor and FIO President Omar Cabezas announced the opening of an office in Nicaragua to receive complaints of human rights violations by the de facto government in Honduras. He said the office was needed because Custodio "is supporting the coup government and is not assuming his duties." (La Opinión reported Aug. 3 that Custodio had been expelled from the FIO, while La Journada reported that he had been expelled from the International Federation of Human Rights; however, the claims are in question, as neither organization appears to have made public statements to that effect.)

An open letter to Custodio, dated July 26, from former friend and colleague Knut Rauchfuss of the NGO Justice is Health, based in Bochum, Germany, went further in explaining why Custodio's international peers—and many Honduras human rights figures—were so disappointed with him. “You are no longer a fighter for human rights,” Rauchfuss wrote, “but rather an accomplice to lies and brutality, an accomplice to military men and assasins. Each day, another [news] article appears, where my old friend Ramón Custodio presents himself as custodian to the Honduran ruling class and its military coup, articles in which you present yourself publicly exonerating soldiers who killed protesters, and letters in which you deny that political prisoners exist and in which you exonerate, too, the torturer Billy Joya. Where is the Ramón Custodio who agreed with the principles of justice and humanity? Where is the Ramón who respected human dignity?” [Editor's note: Joya, a former Honduran Army captain, has assumed the role of security adviser in Micheletti's cabinet. Joya is accused of the illegal detention, torture and murder of civilians in the 1980s, when he was a commanding officer in the military intelligence Batallion 3-16.]

Custodio is also one of the officials whose U.S. visa was revoked. (See story above.) In response to U.S. State Department's action he said, “I prefer to die with dignity in Honduras before being subjected to blackmail and coercion." During the 1980s, as president of the NGO Committee for the Defense of Human Rights in Honduras, Custodio actively spoke out against illegal detentions, disappearances and the government's failure to abide by its own constitutional guarantees, and he advocated on behalf of victims and their families. [Rauchfuss letter via Listas RDS-HN, 7/27/09; La Prensa, 7/30/09]

11. San José Accord still on table, but conflicts loom large

Talks between the two Honduran governments—that of ousted President Manuel Zelaya and of de facto President Roberto Michelleti—as mediated by Costa Rican President Oscar Arias, have taken a tumultuous course over the past few weeks, breaking off several times before reaching a near agreement late last week. The latest proposal, dubbed the San José Accord for the Costa Rican city by that same name, consists of 12 points:

(1) power sharing under a unity government, accepting the recently passed general budget; (2) a general amnesty for political offenses regarding the conflict, and general delay of any lawsuits extending six months; (3) renunciation of a poll or any other act regarding a Constitutional Assembly; (4) moving up elections by a month to Oct. 29; agreeing to international monitoring from now until transfer of power in January; (5) affirming neutrality of armed forces and requesting their assistance with electoral monitoring; (6) return of powers of state to their pre-June 28 status, with Zelaya as president; (7) establishing a verification commission, presided over by the Organization of American States, to make sure the accord is followed, as well as a truth commission, led by the Inter-American Commission for Human Rights to clarify the deeds that occurred before and after June 28; (8) normalization of status between Honduras and the international community; (9) accord effective at the moment of signing; (10) differences in interpretation will be taken up by the verification commission; (11) setting forth a calendar for all steps to take place; (12) commitment to execute accord in good faith.

On July 25, the Honduran military issued a statement that it supported this plan and would not stand in the way of Zelaya entering the country with the accord in place. This move seemed to provide an opening for Micheletti to consider it, which he indeed did signal in an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal on July 27. On July 30, the New York Times reported unnamed officials as saying that Michelleti had called President Arias the previous day to express his support for the San Jose Accord. There was even movement in the Honduran Congress to study the proposal with the expectation of a quick resolution. Zelaya has already agreed to the accord. In July 29 broadcast on San Pedro Sula TV station, he said, “To avoid going against the Arias plan, we will change strategy [on Constitutional reform], but reform is still coming.”

On July 31, however, Michelleti dashed any glimmer of hope by issuing a statement, which said, in part, “We respect many of the points of the agreement but we do not accept some of them like the return of Mr. Zelaya. We don't accept it in this country under any circumstance. If he wants to come back he can, but only if he faces trial." A high-ranking diplomatic mission is slated to travel to Honduras in an effort to persuade the interim government to accept all 12 points of the plan.

The diplomatic drama took place against the backdrop of developments on the ground, which might have complicated negotiations. On July 24, Zelaya, along with a throng of supporters gathered at the Nicaraguan border, briefly crossed over into Honduras soil in defiance of the military, which had threatened his arrest if he did so. The event, which drew thousands of supporters defying curfews and making their way through the jungle, drew the ire of U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who called the move “reckless.” Many Zelaya supporters still remain just over the border in Nicaragua in camps, where Zelaya is reportedly preparing a “popular militia” to guard him when he returns to the country for good.

Meanwhile, the Honduran Public Ministry has filed charges against Zelaya and his former minister of the presidency, Enrique Flores Lanza, for the falsification of documents in connection with an investigation of illegal use of funds for publicity spending, presumably connected to the "cuarta urna" opinion poll to have been conducted on June 28. The charges include a request for an arrest warrant for the deposed president. [NY Times, 7/19/09; NY Times, 7/23/09; NY Times, 7/25/09; NY Times, 7/26/09; Wall St. Journal, 7/27/09; Huffington Post, 7/27/09; NY Times, 7/27/09; Bloomberg, 7/29/09; Proceso Digital, 7/30/09; Proceso Digital, 7/30/09; NY Times, 7/30/09; La Tribuna, 7/30/09; NY Times, 7/31/09; Washington Post, 7/31/09; AFP, 8/1/09]

12. Elite Honduran business interests flex behind-the-scenes power in de facto government

A recent article in The American Prospect revealed that Lanny Davis, chief U.S. lobbyist and public-relations strategist for the pro-coup forces in Honduras, is being paid by members of the Honduras chapter of the Business Council of Latin America (CEAL), including his main contacts, Camilo Atala and Jorge Canahuati. Atala and Canahuati are two of eight extremely powerful families in Honduras, who together control much of the country’s media outlets and other business interests. According to the Committee of Relatives of the Detained-Disappeared in Honduras, CEAL is a continuation of the same core group of business, political and military interests that during the 1980s comprised the Alliance for Progress and Development of Honduras, an anti-Communist group closely tied to the military that COFADEH and other human rights organizations consider a principal actor behind the infamous military intelligence Battalion 3-16 of that era, believed to have functioned as a death squad.

In a July 30 New York Times article revealing de facto President Roberto Michelleti’s brief flirtation with accepting the San José Accord, which would allow the return of ousted President Manuel Zelaya, unnamed sources were quoted as saying that Michelleti faced stiff opposition from these elite business interests in welcoming Zelaya back to the country. Michelleti issued a statement the following day unequivocally stating that his government was no longer considering any resolution that would bring Zelaya back, citing internal resources and "private companies” who had agreed to “freeze prices on the basic basket of goods ... for as long as is necessary,” as a firewall against international isolation and pressure to do otherwise.

Those private companies do not include some major apparel manufacturers with interests in the country, including Nike, the Adidas Group, The Gap and Knight’s Apparel, who on July 28 issued a joint letter to U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton calling for a restoration of democracy in Honduras. [American Prospect, 7/22/09; Nike, 7/27/09; All Headline News, 7/28/09; NY Times, 7/30/09; NY Times, 7/31/09]

13. "Cuarta urna" proposals had raised hopes among Honduras' marginalized communities

The Honduran military recently made available on its Web site an extensive pdf document, which—in the midst of 156 pages listing pre-coup timelines, justifications for military and court actions to remove Manuel Zelaya from power, and miscellaneous legal documents—included a publicity flyer, apparently from the campaign to rally support for Zelaya's "cuarta urna" opinion poll that was slated to have taken place on June 28. With no mention of a call to extend presidential term limits, the flier included a list of proposed changes the Zelaya government had hoped to introduce in the event a constitutional assembly was called to order. Among the 10 points listed were the promotion women’s rights, "guarantees of a multicultural and pluri-ethnic society," and political reforms that would have allowed for more minority representation in government. Ironically—since a key criticism of the process was the perception of Zelaya’s desire to hold on to power—one of the points allowed for midterm votes of confidence for local, congressional and presidential representatives.

Beyond coup d'etat or rule of law, Zelaya or Michelleti, the promise of constitutional reform reportedly struck a chord with many disempowered communities, especially the Garifuna population, an ethnic subgroup descended from Amerindian and African people, of which there are roughly 400,000 in Honduras. Garifuna community activist Alfredo López told the Miami Herald, “We have no political visibility in this country and that makes us extremely vulnerable. The constitutional assembly would have given us a chance to change that.'' For some Garifuna, Zelaya’s ouster meant dashed hopes, which is why they said they were marching not necessarily in support of Zelaya, but for a change in the status quo. According to Carlos Mauricio Palacios, a historian who has worked with indigenous communities, "[The constitutional assembly] was important, not just for the Garifunas, but all the minority communities. This was a chance to secure rights that have long been denied to them.'" [Documento Auditoría Jurídico Militar de las FFAA Sobre Sucesión Presidencial en Honduras, PDF; Honduras Coup 2009, 7/27/09; Miami Herald, 7/22/09]

14. Kidnapped journalist found dead

On July 8, the body of reporter Bernardo Rivera was found buried on a mountainside in the Copán region. Rivera, a former congressional deputy, was kidnapped on March 14 and apparently died in an escape attempt sometime in April. The NGO Reporters Without Borders issued a statement condemning the events, adding that the Honduran government had taken too long in coming to grips with the seriousness of the crime wave sweeping the country. [La Tribuna, 7/13/09; La Tribuna, 7/13/09; previous story: HNR, 5/1-31/09]

15. Other news in brief

Shortly after the events of June 28, the Honduran Foreign Ministry ordered all its diplomats home, and the ambassador to the United States, Roberto Flores Bermudez, complied, saying "This is not a coup d'etat, but rather a process in which a judicial order has been carried out." Eduardo Enrique Reina, a former vice minister of foreign relations and private secretary to Honduras’s ousted president, presented himself on July 16 as Zelaya's ambassador to the country. [Miami Herald, 7/3/09; The Hill, 7/16/09] Rodolfo Pastor Fasquelle, minister of culture under the Zelaya administration who fled to Mexico after hiding in Honduras for seven days following the coup, and Enrique Reina, the new ambassador to the United States, reported that some ministers' personal bank accounts and credit cards were frozen for more than a week following the coup. [MISF interviews with Fasquelle and Reina]
User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Tue Sep 08, 2009 4:35 pm

http://hondurascoup2009.blogspot.com/20 ... ttack.html

This may be one of the most newsworthy actions I have seen yet, because it encapsulates so much that is wrong with the de facto regime. Many correspondents are reporting, and the pro-coup El Heraldo confirms, that Padre Andres Tamayo has been notified that his naturalized Honduran citizenship has been revoked.

For anyone unaware, Padre Tamayo, parish priest for the community of Salamá in Olancho, is an internationally recognized leader of the fight for environmental and social justice in Honduras, awarded the Goldman Prize in 2005.

Padre Tamayo has been an active leader of resistance to the de facto regime. He organized a bus caravan that tried to reach Tegucigalpa from Olancho on June 29 in order to protest the coup, and was fired on by soldiers in the town of Los Limones to prevent them continuing. He led a contingent in the march on Tegucigalpa in early August.

He has also been quoted as calling for an electoral boycott, peaceful resistance to the ugly attempt to force the Honduran people to vote in the unfree election that they are destined to experience in November if matters do not change.

And for this, he was threatened with loss of citizenship. Because Padre Tamayo was born in El Salvador.

Now, Honduras has relatively open naturalization laws, especially for people from other Central American countries. And by now, Padre Tamayo has spent 22 years of his life in Honduras.

But this regime wields the Constitution like a lethal weapon.

Last month, we reported on the threat to Padre Tamayo's citizenship, including the possible constitutional and legal grounds that the de facto regime might use to prosecute him, which are thin.

And now, the threat has been realized. The reports we have received indicate that lawyers for the resistance intend to fight this action legally. It is unclear what process, if any, was actually followed to revoke his citizenship.

The information provided also says that Padre Tamayo has been removed from his parish. That is not something the State can do; it is an action coordinated by the Church hierarchy in Honduras. The unsavory relationship of the Honduran Cardinal with the coup, a relationship he tries hard to deny, is thus made more blatantly obvious.
User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:26 am

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3893

Rerun in Honduras
Coup pretext recycled from Brazil ’64

By Mark Cook

The pretext for the Honduran coup d’état is nothing new. In a remarkable replay, bogus charges that the corporate media in the U.S. and Europe have repeated endlessly without attempting to substantiate—that Honduran president Manuel Zelaya sought to amend the country’s constitution to run for another term—are virtually identical to the sham justification for the 1964 coup against Brazilian president João Goulart.

The Brazilian coup, depicted at the time as a victory for constitutional democracy, kicked off a series of extreme right-wing military coups against democratically elected governments throughout the Southern Cone of Latin America and beyond. Brazil was turned into a base for subversion of neighboring democratic governments (National Security Archive, 6/20/02); Goulart and a previous Brazilian president, Juscelino Kubitschek, both died in 1976 in incidents that have since been attributed to the multinational assassination program Operation Condor (Folha, 1/27/08; Carta Maior, 7/17/08). Given that history, the strength and unanimity of Latin American and international condemnation of the Honduran coup—despite a worldwide media disinformation campaign against Zelaya—is hardly surprising.

On March 31, 1964, the democratic government of Brazil’s Goulart, a wealthy rancher hated by big business for having dramatically raised the minimum wage, was overthrown in a coup d’état organized by ultra-rightist elements in Brazil’s military and strongly backed by the U.S. government. For decades, U.S. officials denied involvement in the coup, but in 2004 the nongovernmental National Security Archive (3/31/04) published newly declassified documents revealing President Lyndon Johnson’s personal involvement and a massive U.S. military and CIA commitment.

At the New York Times, which editorially cheered the “peaceful revolution” (4/3/64), influential columnist Arthur Krock (4/3/64) accused Goulart of seeking to “prolong [his term] by removing the constitutional ban against consecutive presidential succession.”

“What really happened,” Krock declared, in phrasing repeated almost word for word 45 years later in Honduran coverage, “was the failure of a bid for power, contrary to a fundamental principle of the Brazilian Constitution.” Newsweek (4/6/64) and Time (4/10/64) ran similar allegations, also without providing any evidence.

Evidence is just as little needed today, as corporate journalists drape baseless claims with the word “fear” (instead of “assert” or “contend”) in the apparent belief that it absolves them of any responsibility to evaluate whether there is any truth to the charge: “Critics feared [Zelaya] intended to extend his rule past January, when he would have been required to step down,” the New York Times wrote (7/6/09) in a typical passage. Nowhere did the article or others like it attempt to evaluate whether this would even have been possible, given that Zelaya was not a candidate in the country’s November elections and would have to give up the presidency to his successor in January. In fact, Zelaya’s own vice president had resigned in order to run for the presidency.

Media depictions of Goulart as a “leftist” and ally of Castro found their echo in coverage of Honduran President Zelaya as a “leftist” (e.g, Reuters, 7/31/09) and “power- hungry protégé of U.S.-hating Venezuela President Hugo Chávez” (Philadelphia Inquirer, 7/19/09). Forty years after the Brazilian coup, the New York Times (6/23/04) was still running the line that “the armed forces overthrew Mr. Goulart’s government, fearing he intended to install a Cuban-style Commu-nist regime in Brazil.”

There was never the slightest evidence that Goulart intended to install a “Cuban-style Com-munist regime,” any more than that he was attempting to run for another term. As with Zelaya in Honduras, Goulart’s real crime was to use the minimum wage and similar measures to attempt to moderate the extremes of wealth and poverty in his country; Latin America has long suffered from the greatest income inequality in the world (U.N. Human Development Report, 2007/2008). As the National Labor Committee (6/27/07) reported, Honduras’ minimum wage was reduced in 2007, in a race to the bottom against neighboring Nicaragua, when the country joined the Washington-sponsored Central American Free Trade Agreement.

The U.S. corporate media’s cheering for the 1964 coup in Brazil foreshadowed their support for other Latin American dictatorships. In July 1976, four months after the military seized power in Argentina and while tens of thousands were being tortured and killed across the Southern Cone, the New York Times (7/24/76) published a dispatch from Rio headlined “Grip of Latin Military Squeezes Leftists Out.” The article, which did not mention or even hint at the death and torture squads operating across the continent, justified the overthrow of democratic governments in Brazil, Chile, Argentina and Uruguay, reciting unquestioningly the militaries’ own versions of why they seized power.

“Most of the South American military groups reached power during political and economic crises that saw the decomposition of civilian institutions, threats to the unity of the armed forces and open appeals by civilian leaders to the military to abandon its political neutrality,” the article declared, speaking of the militaries’ success in dealing with “subversives” in cooperation with the School of the Americas. It was accompanied by a photo from Pinochet’s Chile of a soldier standing over a box with several handguns. The caption read: “A Chilean soldier guards weapons taken from leftist terrorists.”

U.S. corporate media extolled the economic programs of the dictatorships, ultra-neoliberal policies that greatly increased inequality throughout the region and ended all too often in economic breakdown. Almost two years after the 1964 Brazilian military coup, by which time the intensity of the political repression was undeniable, Time magazine (12/31/65) praised the coup government for slashing wheat and oil subsidies, “thus halting a wasteful drain on Brazil’s treasury.” The effect in skyrocketing food prices was devastating to most Brazilian families. The same article praised the coup regime’s ending of “labor’s inflation-producing 75 percent-to-100 percent wage hikes.” “Many Brazilians still gripe about this year’s 45 percent increase in the cost of living,” the magazine acknowledged, “but businessmen give [Economic Planning Minister Roberto] Campos a rousing cheer, and foreign investors are registering their votes with money.”

Time added approvingly that the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, virtually or entirely absent from Brazil since 1959, had extended massive new loans. The loans, which often disappeared into the pockets of the key figures in the military dictatorships, saddled country after country with massive debts by the early 1980s.

U.S. corporate media typically depict the plotters of these sorts of coups as responsible leaders stepping in to save the country from an erratic left-winger who had lost all popular support because of disastrous economic policies; accordingly, the plotters in Tegucigalpa were described as the “interim government” (AP, 8/1/09), the “caretaker government” (New York Times, 7/6/09), even the “new government” (New York Times, 7/8/09). Newspaper editors are familiar with phrases like “coup leaders,” “coup government” and “de facto rulers,” and use them when they wish—but those were conspicuously missing in most coverage.

Unfortunately for their purposes, the media’s attempt to present the coup group as responsible leaders kept being undermined by the behavior of the leaders themselves. They flew the democratically elected president they had just overthrown into forced exile clad in his pajamas (Washington Post, 7/28/09). They waved around an obviously forged presidential “letter of resignation” that the Honduran Congress straightfacedly pretended to believe in order to “legalize” his ouster (BBC, 7/28/09). (The Honduran Congress has no constitutional authority to dismiss a Honduran president.) Apologists for the coup kept forgetting their lines about term limits, complaining instead about the deposed president’s raising the minimum wage (AP, 8/6/09).

Attempts by the coup leaders and their Washington-based apologists to claim that they were acting in accordance with the Honduran constitution were so laughable that even the corporate media relegated them to guest columns on the opinion page. The drumbeat of such op-eds (e.g., New York Times, 7/7/09), however, with virtually no opposing viewpoints published*, would lead U.S. newspaper readers to believe falsely that Zelaya was ousted because he tried to use a referendum to extend his term in office.

In one widely circulated column, the Los Angeles Times (7/10/09) featured Miguel Estrada, a Bush administration Appeals Court nominee blocked by a Democratic filibuster. Estrada, like other coup defenders, stressed that the current Honduran constitution mandates removal for any president who attempts to change the constitution to run for a second term. The trouble is that Zelaya never proposed anything of the sort—something Estrada had to admit. He asserted, however, that that was the “only conceivable motive” Zelaya could have had for seeking a new constitutional convention—which would have occurred after Zelaya’s successor had already been elected.

Even if Estrada’s sleight-of-hand assertion were true, Zelaya would have had a right to indictment and trial. But there are plenty of legitimate reasons to rewrite the Honduran constitution. It was written in 1982, during the thinly disguised military dictatorship of Gen. Gustavo Alvarez. Alvarez, a School of the Americas alum who worked closely with U.S. Ambassador John Negroponte, set up the death squads that terrorized Honduras and made the country’s security forces indistinguishable from the country’s extreme right wing. It was in May 1983, under the current constitution, that the Honduran congress adopted the infamous Decree 33. As Gerry O’Sullivan wrote in the Humanist (3/1/94), the decree “declared anyone a ‘terrorist’ who distributed political literature, associated with foreigners, joined groups deemed subversive by the government, damaged property or destroyed documents.”

The U.S. corporate media have carefully averted their eyes from such history as that of General Alvarez—as from the role of School of the Americas graduates in the current coup. It was thanks to the School of the Americas Watch and the National Catholic Reporter (6/29/09), not the corporate media, that the public learned of ongoing U.S. training of the Honduran military, despite the Obama administration’s claim to have cut military ties. When history repeats itself, don’t look for accurate coverage from those who got it wrong the first time around.

* The L.A. Times did publish one of the very few op-eds critical of the coup plotters’ pretexts, a piece by Mark Weisbrot (7/23/09).
User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:01 pm

http://us.oneworld.net/article/366563-u ... spite-coup

U.S. Chided for Aiding Honduras Despite Coup

WASHINGTON, Sep 8 (OneWorld.net) - Only the U.S. government has the leverage to force a return to democracy in Honduras, says regional analyst Laura Carlsen, urging the Obama administration to impose real financial consequences on the military-backed leaders who seized power in late June.

What's the Story?

Honduran coup leader Roberto Micheletti has admitted that the only country with the power to punish his regime is the United States, which purchases 70 percent of the country's exports and otherwise supports its economy through family remittances and direct aid.

Carlsen, who has long covered trade, finance, democracy, and other issues in Latin America, is urging the U.S. State Department to stop "sitting on its hands" and make the official coup declaration that would cut off aid to Honduras. In the meantime, a highly suspect electoral campaign has begun and massive human rights violations are being reported by independent observers.

"Although Honduras is a small, impoverished nation that plays a relatively minor role in U.S. geopolitical strategy, the issues at stake make it a test case for a new foreign policy based on the principles of democracy and rule of law," says Carlsen. [Read her full statement on the situation below.]

U.S. Delegation Finds Rights Abuses, Poor Media Coverage

A four-member U.S. delegation traveled to Honduras in mid-August to investigate the current situation in the country. They discussed events and the current state of society with local rights groups, workers, the U.S. Ambassador, the wife of ousted president Manuel Zelaya, journalists, and other people they met along the way.

They found that: "Zelaya, who was kidnapped in the middle of the night by the head of the army, whom he had just fired, is in fact quite popular among the working people, the poor, and the peasants of Honduras -- in other words the vast majority," according to the Kansas City-based Cross-Border Network, whose president was among the U.S. delegates.

The delegation watched a grassroots social movement of tens of thousands demonstrate in Honduras' two major cities, Tegucigalpa and San Pedro Sula. They say they saw brutal repression by police and military, and interviewed the victims.

"We met the U.S Ambassador who agreed it was a military coup even though the State Department won't call it that, thus invoking the law requiring cut off of all remaining aid," said the Cross-Border Network.

The delegation was organized by the human rights group Global Exchange, which works in various ways to empower Americans to act -- both in their own communities and around the world -- for a more fair and sustainable world. [Read the full delegation report and see photos and read testimonies of abuse victims.]

Madagascar: A Coup Condemned

In March, the U.S. State Department wasted no time in condemning the coup-style process by which a sitting president halfway around the world was forced to resign, cutting off all non-humanitarian aid to the developing island nation of Madagascar off the east coast of Africa.

The U.S. government had been providing about $110 million per year to help improve lives and create opportunities for the Malagasy people -- until the 35-year-old politician and former disc jockey Andry Rajaolina and his supporters destabilized the capital and seized power, eventually winning the support of the military, which said its only aim was to maintain order. The European Union also froze about $880 million in aid after the coup.

A negotiation process led by the Mozambican statesman Joaquim Chissano raised hopes in August that the rival parties would be able to agree on a transitional leadership group to usher the country towards free and fair elections, but a Sep. 4 deadline has since come and gone without Rajaolina assenting to any power-sharing proposals offered by his main rival and the two former presidents of the country who took part in the discussions.

"We are now in a wait-and-see mode and are watching the implementation phase [of the agreement] to see what happens," a U.S. Embassy spokesperson told the IRIN news service in early August. [Click here for the latest news on the Madagascar political crisis from AllAfrica.com.]

- This article was compiled by Jeffrey Allen.
User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Sun Sep 20, 2009 1:49 pm

http://www.truthout.org/092009Z

September 15 - Central American Independence Day; Neocolonialism Meets Resistance in Honduras

Friday 18 September 2009

by: Tom Loudon, t r u t h o u t | News Analysis


On the 80th day of the coup, both the de facto government and the resistance movement against the coup held marches to celebrate the anniversary of Central America's independence from Spain. At a military parade, de facto President Roberto Micheletti defiantly insisted that it would take a military intervention to remove him. Meanwhile, thousands of coup resisters, with elected President Manuel Zelaya's wife at the head, marched through the central park of Tegucigalpa, where last month police and military attacked peaceful protesters and passers-by. The massive resistance movement in Honduras continues to grow, denouncing the violent coup as an illegal takeover on the part of neocolonial economic and military interests.

The EU used the occasion of the anniversary to promise further sanctions if there was not a return to constitutional order. Secretary of State Clinton merely lamented "the turmoil and political differences that have ... divided Honduras."

During the month of August, the coup government of Honduras suffered a number of setbacks on the international level. First, was the release of an Amnesty International Report highlighting "serious human rights concerns which should be addressed as a matter of urgency." The report corroborated "increasingly disproportionate and excessive use of force being used by the police and military to repress legitimate and peaceful protests across the country."

Subsequently, delegations arrived from the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACH), the OAS and the International Criminal Court (ICC). The preliminary report from the IAHC confirmed that coup leaders in Honduras have committed thousands of violations of human rights. The Commission also said that "only a return to institutional democracy" will allow Honduras to restore individual rights.

The OAS delegation, after two unsuccessful attempts to enter Honduras, made a short visit in which they again attempted to persuade the coup government to accept the San Jose Accords. During his visit, OAS Secretary General Insulza stated: "The message to the de facto government is still very clear: Why cause harm to the population when there is a very clear solution by way of the San José Accord? I hope that this is understood."

The visit, which perhaps had the most influence on the behavior of the coup government, was that of the International Criminal Court. One of the members of this delegation was Judge Garzon, the Spanish judge who brought the infamous Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet to trial. Garzon stated that he was, "gravely concerned by the human rights situation in the country."

Honduras, unlike the United States, is a signatory to the ICC. Serious human rights crimes committed in Honduras and not prosecuted by Honduran authorities can lead to charges being filed by the International Court. At a press conference, ICC representatives indicated that among the cases they investigated were seven which they considered possible cases for the ICC. They also stated that charges could be brought against intellectual authors of crimes as well as actual perpetrators.

By the end of August, tactics of the security forces had changed. Frontal attacks on marches and caravans seem to have stopped. However, other forms of intimidation have been adopted. The police and army follow along with the marchers, (in an attempt to intimidate them), either directly behind or on either side of peaceful protesters. Security forces take photographs of protesters and follow them after the marches disburse. They arrest anyone caught spray-painting.

A notable exception to this new approach occurred during a protest in Choluteca when the mayor arrived at a protest armed with a pistol and accompanied by some 100 men armed with machetes, who proceeded to attack the demonstration. The demonstrators were protesting the presence of Elvin Santos, the Liberal Party candidate for president, whom they consider illegitimate. Five of the protesters were arrested.

Selective murders continue on a weekly basis. On Saturday, August 29, Ismael Padilla was murdered by unknown assailants in front of his house. Padilla was president of the Association of Microbuses, and had accompanied President Zelaya to pick up ballot boxes in one of the buses on the day before the coup. His assassination was a clear message to all who oppose the coup and support the call for a Constitutional Assembly.

International pressure on the coup government mounted in September. Most countries, including the United States, have said that they will not recognize elections if Zelaya is not first returned to power. The EU recently promised further sanctions if there is not a return to constitutional order. The EU also said that it will not send observers to the November vote if it is overseen by the coup regime. The UN announced that it has cut off funding that it had been providing for the election process.

The United States cut more aid and announced that visas were being revoked for 17 key people in the coup government, including the de facto president, attorney general, head of armed forces and all 14 Supreme Court judges. Perhaps even more threatening to the coup regime, the United States canceled an unknown number of visas for powerful civilians who back the coup. This past weekend, Adolfo FacussÈ, president of the powerful National Association of Industries of Honduras, which many think has financed the coup, was taken off his flight from Honduras and held by ICE agents in Miami before being deported back to Honduras. Creating this kind of embarrassment may just be the most effective thing the US has done to date to discourage supporters of the coup. A few days prior to his trip, Mr. FacussÈ announced a plan devised by business owners to increase the vote in the November elections. Pro-coup businesses are considering offering discounts to people who show the ink on their fingers indicating that they have voted.

Earlier this week, an incident occurred at the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva. Several countries, including Brazil, Argentina and Mexico refused to allow the representative from Honduras to stay in the session unless he was approved by President Zelaya. After several hours of conflict, which postponed the opening of the session, he was escorted out by UN guards.

Despite increasing international pressure, the coup government seems determined to hold out at all costs. As the day of the scheduled election grows closer, a negotiated solution to the crisis becomes less viable. A broad-based national coalition against the coup has called for a boycott of the elections if President Zelaya has not been returned to power. But the coup regime passed a law making it illegal to advocate that others not vote. If elections are held under these conditions, it will certainly spark increased social unrest.

Independence from national and foreign neocolonial elites remains a vibrant hope for the people of Honduras. The resistance movement in Honduras has called on the international community to take more measures to isolate the coup regime. Given the history of US domination of Honduras and increasing evidence linking US corporate interests and senior US government officials with the coup, the Obama Administration has a particular obligation to make sure that US policy in Central America is aligned with democratic efforts to build more just and equitable societies, rather than neocolonial elites.

Tom Loudon is co-director of the Quixote Center in Washington, DC.
User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Sun Sep 20, 2009 1:53 pm

User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:27 pm

http://upsidedownworld.org/main/content/view/2112/1/

The Colombian newspaper El Tiempo reports that high powered former paramilitaries in Colombia are recruiting ex-paramilitary members for work in Honduras.

The short article which appeared in the Sept. 13 edition of the paper, claims that 40 men participated in a “training” that took place at the “El Japón” ranch, close to the rural town of La Dorada, half way between Medellín and Bogotá. The ranch was ex-propriated from its former owner and convicted narco-trafficker Jairo Correa Alzate, and turned over to the DNE (Dirección Nacional de Estupefacientes), the Colombian version of the DEA.

The 1000 hectare ranch was parceled out in 2004, supposedly under the charge of the DNE, but 300 hectares were leased to Gustavo Isaza, who is linked to the brutal Omar Isaza Self-defense Front, a decommissioned branch of the former AUC paramilitary group. According to the paper’s sources, the recruits were offered salaries of US$750 per month to “guard ranches” in Honduras.

The recruits were reportedly waiting for higher-ups to decide whether they would be transported by plane through Panamá, or illicitly by boat up the coast.

In Honduras, the National Front Against the Coup has repeatedly denounced the presence of foreigners employed as paramilitaries who target key leaders in the resistance movement against the coup. Bertha Olivo of the Committee of Families of the Detained and Disappeared told El Tiempo about a group of 120 paramilitaries funded by pro-coup businessmen. Reports point to various concentrations of paramilitaries in San Pedro Sula, and the Santa Barbara Department.

Tomás Andino, an elected Deputy from the leftist UD party said, “Many rightwing extremist organizations from different countries have offered support to the de facto government. They offer manpower and weapons.”

“We know of combatants from Cuba and El Salvador, so the possibility of Colombians doesn’t surprise us.”
User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:36 pm

http://upsidedownworld.org/main/content/view/2109/68/

Honduras: National opposition to coup becomes a social force

Written by Jennifer Moore
Tuesday, 15 September 2009


Source: ALAI, Latin America in Movement

A lead Honduran researcher believes coup backers will not be able to sustain their support for the de facto regime until elections in November.

Director of Scientific Research for the National Autonomous University of Honduras Leticia Salomón says no one ever anticipated such widespread opposition to the ouster of President Manuel Zelaya on June 28th 2009. Now, more than two months later, the country is largely isolated from the international community and diverse sectors of Honduran society continue protesting daily in the streets. As a result, Salomón suggests, the costs for coup conspirators have become too burdensome.

Although the sociologist and economist hesitates to speculate about how the coup regime might fall and expresses concern about bolstered business and military involvement in political affairs, she says, “One thing is for sure, and that is that they cannot sustain this government until November and the day of the elections. For various reasons, not just as a result of the protest in the streets, but considering this in relationship to the interests of the business sector and politicians.”

In her view, the Honduran business sector played a key role in the coup. “Those [businesses] that thought the coup would be a matter of thousands of dollars, now have thousands and even millions of dollars invested in this. Not just money that they have put in, but money that they have lost as a result of the highway blockades, work stoppages, and strikes. The business sector recognizes that this has been terrible for them, and as a result, a strong business sector has begun to pressure for a solution to this because they have reached the upper limit of the economic cost of the coup.”

But beyond confounding coup makers' plans, Salomón adds that broad-based national resistance to the coup is giving rise to a new “social force” in the country that any future government will have to contend with.

In an interview with ALAI on August 31st 2009, this researcher also with the Honduran Centre for Documentation lays out the interests behind Zelaya's ouster that she identifies among politicians, big business and the armed forces, toward which end she says there was no legal route. She also speculates on additional tensions that might cause support for the de facto regime to fold.

The political trigger

The same day that President Zelaya was ousted, a national opinion poll was to take place that would have asked Hondurans if they wanted a referendum during upcoming elections to consult the population on whether or not to install a National Constituent Assembly that would rewrite the country's political constitution. Following the poll, congress would still have had to approve the referendum and any national assembly would not be installed until a new government was in place. Coup backers allege, however, that Zelaya was seeking a constitutional amendment that would allow him to seek re-election and that this constituted an infraction. Salomón observes, however, that diverse groups were interested in constitutional reforms that, at first, even included the current presidential candidate for the National Party, one of the two traditional parties in Honduras.

The current constitution was written in 1982 in the context of the cold war, an influential military and the Central American crisis. Written with the intent to be “for life,” says Salomón, it also “left gaps.” Among those interested in reforms, according to the researcher, have been those hoping to advance decentralization in Honduras, those seeking the possibility of presidential re-election, and still others wishing to lay the groundwork for participatory democracy and broader recognition of collective rights.

Among those initially supporting this process, recalls Salomón, was the current National Party Presidential Candidate Pepe Lobo. She describes Lobo's support as having been “strong” and “decided.” She explains, “Distinct politicians, and Pepe Lobo in particular, were aware of changes needing to be made to the constitution, and he, like many other ex-Presidents, were interested in the possibility of a re-election.”

However, national party members quickly set Lobo straight given concerns about the likelihood of a future re-election for Zelaya whose social bases were expanding at the same time that bi-party politics in Honduras have been on the decline.

Salomón stresses that Zelaya was not considering re-election for 2010. However, she says, it was a consideration for future elections that worried his opponents. “Were a National Constituent Assembly to eliminate the prohibition [for re-election], [Zelaya] would be able to run as candidate as part of a political movement that has already been gaining support and which in the coming year was going to present the idea of creating a new political party in the country that could break with the bi-party politics that exist.”

Participatory democracy was a further proposal that led the political system to “shut down” to the idea of even a mere opinion poll. Salomón places early efforts toward greater direct participation of civil society in political life beginning around 1998.

From the start, she says, the idea was unacceptable to dominant political groups.“Any real effort to establish a true participatory democracy that would go beyond popular mobilizations and that would permit social sectors to make an impact in decision making in congress were seen as a threat to the political parties.”

Both broader input and greater social control over decision making that participatory democracy would imply put politicians on the defensive. “[Accountability] is the fundamental point here because participation implies follow up and control on one hand, and the presence of organizations giving opinions and making proposals about big decisions on the other.”

But, for this researcher, the more decisive role in the coup belongs to the big business sector.

Principal coup backers

“I would venture to say that a central figure in the coup were business leaders.”Not only is Salomón convinced that certain business leaders helped finance the coup, she believes they were even “pushing for the coup.”

“It is important to mention that currently there are a fusion of very powerful economic, political and media interests. Here, one cannot talk about business leaders on one side and politicians on the other because there are both nationalist business people and liberal business people. And if we consider the principal political figures in the country, they are also business owners such that we cannot separate one from the other. And at the moment that they become both politicians and business owners they have a greater capacity to negotiate and to impact upon decision making.”

Salomón considers Micheletti, whose business interests are in the transportation sector according to the newspaper El Libertador,2 to be a weak player and a “circumstantial figure” in the coup, who lost the race for the liberal party presidential candidacy in 2008. She observes his interest to become the de facto leader and says he has certainly played his part. But, she qualifies, there are no Micheletti supporters and he would fall without support from stronger business leaders and the military.

On the other hand, she considers that past President Carlos Flores Facussé (1998-2002) is one of the masterminds of Zelaya's ouster. She describes Facussé, an important media owner, as a strong figure in the liberal party saying she is sure that “he participated in the meeting in which they decided to carry out the coup.”

Salomón comments that “President Flores is a person who does not appear in public, who makes his moves behind the scene, who meets with the right people, but who will never give public appearances or declarations.” As owner of the major daily newspaper La Tribuna, she says, it is his vehicle to “transmit his messages to the population.” She describes its overall tone as “belligerent, war-mongering and provocative.”

Together with other business leaders who collectively own a large part of Honduras' mass media, and who have interests in banks, fast food, energy, pharmaceuticals and textiles as well as other sectors, she believes that beyond individual reforms that President Zelaya adopted, affecting their particular privileges, that the rise in the minimum wage is what led the business sector to collectively “shut down and say, we don't want a President like this any more.”

Now, as a result of the coup, she says, the capacity of business to have influence over political life in Honduras has grown, having gained what she calls “veto power.”

“From this moment on, the business sector will decide if the President is or is not fulfilling his role, to be able to do away with him if he dares to raise the minimum wage or to impinge upon the privileges that the distinct business groups have in this country.”

To date, Salomón's research has focused on the role of domestic business interests in Honduras. However, she observes, “Indubitably, Honduran business owners are not strong in the sense that there is only national capital invested in their businesses. Their interests are directly related to Central American economic groups, as well as international groups... It would be necessary to carry out further investigations, but it is clear that these businessmen quickly activated their business networks in the area in order to gain solidarity for their position in favour of the coup.”

In terms of whether or not the US, in particular, had a direct hand in the coup, she has her doubts. But, she is sure that the Ambassador knew and says their role is key toward a resolution. “President Obama is right when he says that it's ridiculous that we once told them “Gringos Go Home” and now we are asking them to intervene to solve a problem. But, there is an objective reality: that the two key figures in this coup are both very linked to US interests, particularly the business class and the military.”

The military, like the business class, in her analysis, have also gained “veto power.”1

A military resurgence

“This is the greatest danger that we face at the moment...that, at any time, the military can now engage in political decisions, discussion and debate, to opine over whether or not a president should continue. Once again, the military have become main characters or political actors, which is a problem because they use force and what has just taken place could occur again.”

In the perspective of this specialist on the Honduran military, the coup presented the military with a chance to recuperate what they had lost, particularly since 1995 under the leadership of the liberal party. Since this time, she says, the military have undergone a process of submission to civil institutions. Under Liberal President Carlos Roberto Reina (1994-1998) obligatory military service was eliminated and the military lost control over key institutions such as the police, the state telecommunications company (Hondutel), the state port authority, as well as others.

But she also sees an ideological motivation with ties to the international right. “On the part of the military, their contribution to the generation of this political crisis was the Chávez threat. They began to get riled up about the spectre of Chávez, associating him with the spectre of communism in the 1980s, in which discourse retired military officers were specialists. To hear them talk about this threat, one thought that a war was about to begin.”

Initially, however, immediately following the coup, the involvement of the military appeared almost “circumstantial” and many people, says Salomón, even pitied the military saying, “What a mess the politicians have gotten them into.”

“But then to see them in the streets containing the social protest against the coup, excelling at repression and with such cruelty, this is unforgivable and unjustifiable because never will one be able to believe that someone was obliged to participate in this situation and then come out shooting against a demonstration, or carrying out all manner of [human rights violations].”

Further evidence that the military had their own interests in getting involved in the coup became evident when a law was introduced before congress in mid-August seeking reinstatement of obligatory military service. “This was an old aspiration of the military,” says Salomón.

The very controversial measure was unsuccessful. However, retired military officials are also known to have been repositioned in the public sector, in institutions such as the Migration Authority.“The fact that a retired military officer has been placed in migration is an attempt to recuperate spaces lost in the past, and migration is one of those.”

Migration has both ideological and economic significance to the military. “Before, migration was under almost exclusive control of the military. Not just for ideological reasons, but for economic reasons as well. Through migration, the head of the armed forces received a sum of money periodically.” Migration also allows them, according to Salomón, to monitor the entry and exit particularly of “those who challenge or question the system.”

“It would not surprise me,” she continues, “if their next step were to control the state telecommunications company (Hondutel) which is a very profitable company for the state and which they have longed to regain control over. This is also ideological allowing them impunity in the intervention of telephone calls of whatever person they would like to monitor without any sort of external oversight.”

The military escape route

Given the accumulation of interests to see Zelaya out of office, Salomón discards any notion that the decision to oust the President, in the way that he was, could have been made in isolation by the military. She also discards any suggestion that there was a legal route for his destitution.

“This decision was not made just by the military,” she states, adding that in no case would the military have been the correct group to implement a court order should there have been one for Zelaya's arrest, this being the jurisdiction of the police. In the case of the court order that has been made evident, she says, “It is unclear if this order really existed, since the one that has been presented does not have an official number.” “In other words,” she considers, “the order was written at the last minute, after the fact, because it did not follow normal procedure.”

“I would dare to say,” concludes Salomón, “that they were all complicit. That they arrived at an agreement to oust the President in the way that they did, although I would not exclude the possibility that it was the military that suggested how, since they are the experts in this kind of thing and have done it before.”

“It is important that it be made clear that in the days and weeks before the coup, there were meetings between politicians, the military, the church and business leaders to decide what to do.” She is sure that the US Ambassador participated too, giving his opinion and asking questions. “The US knew, just like the business leaders and the politicians did.”

While some of those involved might have been in favour of a legal route, suggests Salomón, “They couldn't stop the president using the law...According to the current constitution, there is no way to destitute the president.”

“Neither does the congress have the power to destitute the president. But they arranged it in such a way, and so quickly, thinking that this won't last and in 24 hours everyone will forget the details and they will come out applauding us for having gotten rid of President Zelaya.”

Miscalculations

In other words, everyone was surprised by the opposition that arose the same day as the ouster. And no one calculated in the extra costs that internal and external pressure to revert the coup would have on economic, political and military interests in ousting Zelaya, suggests Salomón. Costs to coup backers, that she believes, have risen beyond what is tolerable. But not just financially.

In terms of the military, whose legitimacy in recent years, she says, has rivalled that of the church, Salomón sees the potential that their entire future could be in jeopardy, particularly as a result of their involvement in serious human rights violations since the coup.

On one hand, military sanctions from the US toy with the aspirations of newer or younger officials “whose dream is to go to the US or to participate in the activities of the Organization of American States or the United Nations.” She suggests that it is mainly the leadership of the military that is holding out now “to protect their dignity more than anything.”

But considering the grave human rights violations that the military and police have helped to perpetrate against the coup opposition, which she calls absolutely “unacceptable,” she sees longer term efforts to seriously reduce their role. “If this is what they do publicly when there are people filming and the world is watching, we are obliged to seriously consider what is going on inside the police and the military.” It leads her to consider whether it will become necessary “to think about their reduction to the absolute minimum or even their complete elimination” like in Costa Rica.

On the political level, she comments, “The legitimacy of the political parties had already plummeted. But now the rejection of the two traditional parties has grown in an incredible way across the country. They can have their political campaigns, but they will be aimed more at an urban audience, since the rural areas won't accept any campaign...They are experts at campaigning and know how to bring people in from other places to support them, but the military are there taking care of them and protecting them.”

The opposition to the coup rejects elections without the return of President Zelaya, saying that these would “effectively legitimize military violence.” Furthermore, now that the US has announced that it will not recognize the results of elections under current conditions, the pressure on these politicians continues to rise.

But, according to Salomón, the social pressure will not end with the elections.

She attributes the strength of the current opposition to the coup to its ability to find common ground among diverse sectors through this opposition, rather than allegiance to a particular party or ideology and believes that it will transcend the current period. With a sense of hopefulness, she says, “It doesn't matter who wins the elections in November, the next government will have to deal with this important social force if it hopes to even minimally govern the country.”

Notes:

1. See Leticia Salomón, http://alainet.org/active/31692
2. See El Libertador, http://ellibertador.hn/Nacional/3135.html

- Jennifer Moore, an independent Canadian journalist, reported from Honduras for ALAI and FEDAEPS.
User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:11 pm

http://hondurascoup2009.blogspot.com/20 ... -exit.html

A Supreme Exit?

Several of you have asked why the US State Department included the entire Supreme Court in the list of people whose visas were revoked. Many Americans have failed to grasp the nature of the Supreme Court in Honduras. This is not anything like our Supreme Court. This is first, and foremost, because the Supreme Court is political as much as it is judicial in Honduras.

A committee approved by Congress nominates, and then Congress selects from the nominees and approves a slate of 15 justices who serve a seven year term. This procedure was changed from the original Constitutional procedure (see below); it places a great deal of power over the composition of the court in the hands of Congress.

The nominating committee is made of of 7 people. For this court, the nominating committee consisted of Ramón Custodio (human rights commissioner), Rolando Bú (representing civil society), Israel Salinas (representing unions), Emilio Larach (representing business) , Óscar Garcia (representing lawyers) , Omar Casco (representing the current Supreme Court), and Yolanda Irias (civil society??).

The nominating committee was deeply divided about all but 21 of the candidates it advanced to Congress. The La Prensa article cited above notes the intense political pressure being exerted on the nominating committee by the "political powers" of the country. The article also notes that this time there was some pressure in Congress to include some of the then currently serving justices in the list in addition to the 45 nominees the committee was to return, a conflict which centered attention on Omar Casco, who supported it. "But if Congress decides to respect the list, those interests [the political powers] will shift to the nominees to offer them the judgeships if they will obey the orders [of the political powers], " said Congressperson Victor Cubas. He added:

"they will tell them that they will be selected but that they must follow the dictates of the groups of power, same as last time..."

By Congress, I mean the President of Congress, who was Roberto Micheletti this January, when the current court was appointed.

The Supreme Court justices named are usually distributed evenly between members of the Nacionalist and Liberal parties, with a slight edge given to the party whose President is in power.

Remember that, under the only constitutional reform procedure that Congress wants to have available, it was Congress that amended the Constitution to gain control of both the nominating and approval process for the Supreme Court. Previously, the President of the country nominated the candidates, and the Congress then approved the nominations.

It is widely recognized by international observers that the Honduran Supreme Court is highly politicized, which is an inevitable consequence of being appointed to terms, rather than having the lifetime appointments which have allowed US Supreme Court justices to take surprising positions after appointment.

Each of the present justices represents a particular political faction within the country. The factions in turn make up the political parties. For example, Tomas Arita Valle, the justice who signed the backdated detention order for Zelaya, for example, is a loyal member of Carlos Flores's faction.

This Supreme Court, made up of members of factions that support the coup, has also done its part in supporting the coup, from backdating the detention warrant for Zelaya to approving blatantly trumped up charges from the prosecutor, as we've previously examined, to issuing a legal opinion about the constitutional impediments to the San Jose Accords that's used by the de facto government to support its continued intransigence.

So pressuring this Supreme Court is appropriate political action on the US part.

So it comes as something of a surprise that they are also doing legal work that works against the de facto regime.

This is largely not covered in the Honduran press. Today's Tiempo has an interesting article that indicates a way that the Supreme Court could provide an exit out of the political crisis in Honduras.

The article is about an appeal lodged with the Supreme Court in August by lawyers for Manuel Zelaya asking the court to rule Congress's actions illegal and thus completely reverse its appointment of Micheletti as President.

Back in early August, the Supreme Court gave Congress a week to produce all of the documentation around the case, including the decree appointing Micheletti President and removing Manuel Zelaya. Congress ignored the request (didn't they charge Zelaya with ignoring a court order?!). On September 7, lawyers for Zelaya submitted a request for a summary judgment because Congress has not produced the required paperwork.

Today the Constitutional bench of the Supreme Court gave Congress 24 hours to produce the requested documentation. If Congress does not produce it, the Supreme Court can move to summary judgement. A summary judgment could declare null and void the acts of Congress removing Zelaya and appointing Micheletti, and could order the restitution of Zelaya.

Could this be a way out? This is why the State Department pressure on the Supreme Court makes sense.
User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Sounder » Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:22 am

Thanks John for keeping us up to date on this Honduran coup business.

The Jennifer Moore article is encouraging and does show that there are dangers for operators that overplay their hand.
All these things will continue as long as coercion remains a central element of our mentality.
Sounder
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:43 pm

http://www.chavezcode.com/2009/09/zelay ... -just.html

Eva Golinger wrote:President Zelaya is back in Honduras - this just confirmed after a live telephone conversation took place between President Chávez and President Zelaya. The ousted Honduran president has apparently returned to Honduras and made it to the capital city of Tegucigalpa after 2 days of traveling through the mountains and countryside. He is now at the Brazilian Embassy in Tegucigalpa, waiting to complete his return to power. The coup regime has yet to respond. Zelaya was ousted in a military coup and forced into exiled on June 28, 2009 and has been struggling to return ever since. The people of Honduras have remained in the streets resisting the brutal repressive coup regime, led by Roberto Micheletti, now for almost 3 months. The world community has condemned the coup regime yet has failed to force it to cease its illegal occupation of the Honduran government and allow Zelaya's return to power. Despite Washington's minimal efforts to publicly portray its pressure of the coup regime, it has continued to fund the political parties and NGOs backing the coup, and the Pentagon has continued to fund, train, arm and engage the Honduran military, largely responsible for the coup and the subsequent state of repression. The US occupies a large military base outside of Tegucigalpa, in Palmerola, Soto Cano, which it considers one of its most important operational bases in the region. The airplane carrying President Zelaya illegally took off from this military base on the morning of the coup, with the full knowledge and approval of the Pentagon's forces stationed at Soto Cano.

Zelaya's return to Honduras has been long awaited and fought for by the international community, but particularly by the Honduran people. President Chávez announced that he will activate a plan with other regional governments to ensure Zelaya's safety and full transition back to power. This action comes just as the 64th General Assembly meeting of the United Nations is taking place in New York City, where the majority of Latin American presidents are expected to attend. The Honduran coup was one of the main issues to be addressed at the United Nations meeting.
User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby JackRiddler » Tue Sep 22, 2009 8:20 am

.

Since yesterday Zelaya's been back in Honduras, at the Brazilian embassy where crowds have gathered. Junta has declared curfew and is attempting to keep capital in a lockdown even during the day. Must go to work now, but many updates have been posted in the following DU thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/di ... 02x4070408

Latest developments (Narconews):

3:37 p.m.: The coup regime makes its first move, declaring a military curfew in effect from 4 p.m. to 7 a.m. What's not clear is whether it will be obeyed by the crowds converging around the Embassy, and what the regime's next move will be if the public disregards its curfew.

4:21 p.m.: The military curfew began 21 minutes ago, but a multitude of citizens continue to congregate in front of the Brazilian embassy, making and listening to speeches against the coup regime. In other words: What if they called a curfew and nobody stayed home?

4:31 p.m.: Brazilian Foreign Minister Celso Amorim says that he doubts very much that the Honduran coup regime would commit "a flagrant violation of International Law" by invading his country's embassy in Tegucigalpa.

4:56 p.m.: The regime is trying everything. Cell phone service is being screwed with again for the past hour. Channel 36 has gone off the air. Radio Globo's Internet site is down. Here is an alternate link to Radio Globo's live stream. Keep storming the gates of the information blockade.

5:06 p.m.: Radio Globo reports that a caravan of more than 2,000 vehicles filled with coup opponents is en route from the state of El Paraiso to the national capital. Also reports massive traffic jams in Tegucigalpa now, an hour after curfew took effect.

5:21 p.m.: Coup "president" Micheletti just spoke on a "cadena nacional" (in which all TV, radio and cable stations are required to broadcast his message). He confirmed that Zelaya is in the country, insisted that the June 28 coup was "legal," said Zelaya will have to face charges against him, insisted that the country is in complete calm (if so, then why the military curfew?), attacked the government of Brazil for protecting Zelaya in its Embassy, and told everyone that the National Police and the National Army are behind him. He ended with shouts of "Viva Honduras" to a small group of coup functionaries. He sounds frightened, but is digging in his heels.

Upon the termination of his broadcast, a woman on Radio Globo mocked him mercilessly, saying "no one owes obedience to an order by a de facto regime," and noted that the curfew was called just ten minutes before it took effect, leaving millions of Hondurans to have to get home from work but without enough time to do it. "Nobody is obeying the order," she said. "Nor should they."

5:30 p.m.: I'll be live on Flashpoints radio (available at the KPFA website), hosted by Dennis Bernstein, at the top of the hour (8 p.m. ET, 5 p.m. PT) to talk about the situation in Honduras. There will also be a report from Tim Russo - professor at the upcoming Narco News School of Authentic Journalism - who was in front of the Brazilian Embassy in Tegucigalpa today when President Zelaya appeared from the balcony to greet the crowd, and took audiotape of the moment.

5:42 p.m.: Leaders of the Liberal Party bloc that turned against the coup have now signed a public letter calling on party members "in all the popular barrios" of Tegucigalpa and throughout the country to converge on the Brazilian Embassy to protect President Zelaya. Radio Globo just read the letter live on the air.

5:50 p.m.: The coup regime has just cut electricity to entire neighborhoods surrounding the Brazilian Embassy and Channel 36 TV. How long do you think it will take the people to install a generator in each place? The same will happen when the regime cuts the water, the next likely step coming from that form of logic. And the people will usher in water trucks to refill the tanks. Hell, they'll bring it cup by cup if they have to! This is a losing gambit by the Micheletti regime because it does not have control of the street.

6:52 p.m.: As predicted in the previous update, the regime's attempt to cut electricity to the Brazilian Embassy is already an epic fail. Tim Russo just reported live on that Flashpoints radio show from inside the Embassy as the electric power went back on! A discussion about a half hour prior, on Radio Globo, included a call for generators and a pledge by the head of the electrical workers union to send technicians to set them up. A half hour later, there was light. An organized people can never be beat. That is the lesson of Honduras.

8:17 p.m.: The coup regime has just extended the military curfew until 6 p.m. tomorrow evening, which means nobody goes to work on Tuesday, not even during daylight hours, and all stores will be closed. (Schools were already out as the teachers unions called a national strike and for their members to come to the Brazilian embassy.) Meanwhile, the US State Department has recommended that US citizens avoid all non-essential travel to Honduras. It's as if there's a general strike without it even being called for!


Above from:
http://narcosphere.narconews.com/thefie ... d-honduras

So as morning breaks, this would appear to be the decisive day.

Image

See you all later...

.
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Tue Sep 22, 2009 8:44 am

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/09/21-14

Zelaya's Return to Tegucigalpa Brings Coup Closer to its End

Calls for face-to-face dialogue, without mediation * Coup "betrayed and made a mockery of" the Arias process * Zelaya building public international support and meeting with resistance leaders * Calls for Hondurans from around the country to gather in Tegucigalpa

by Laura Carlsen

At midday today, 86 days since the military coup d'etat in Honduras, President Zelaya returned to join the resistance movement in the final stretch of the long fight to restore constitutional order. As a spy helicopter buzzed the demonstrators and police poured into the area, thousands of supporters gather outside the Brazilian embassy to receive the President. (Telesur has continuous coverage here in Spanish.)

In his first comments, Zelaya declared a "day of celebration." Zelaya called on everyone to gather at the Brazilian Embassy, and reasserted the commitment to non-violence. "I'm not afraid of the judicial process," he affirmed and added he would face any accusations but that so far all the coup had produced was calumnious statements.

Zelaya is lining up his support and his strategy in these moments. He announced that he was waiting for communication from President Lula, the OAS, the United Nations, the European Union and others in an interview with Telesur. He said his plan is to initiate internal dialogue and that the idea is to demonstrate the support of the international community without involving it in the dialogue. He added that he has not spoken with de facto government and was meeting with his cabinet and resistance groups.

The legitimate president of Honduras called on the Armed Forces to maintain the calm. "The Armed Forces are part of the people, they come from the villages and neighborhoods and should never point their guns at their own people," he stated. He urged a process to "recover peace and tranquility" in the country.

Although the police are deploying to control the growing crowd, resistance leaders are maintaining control. In a Telesur interview, Juan Barahona, a leader of the National Front Against the Coup, expressed his opinion that the "Army cannot launch an offensive here—there are too any people."

A visibly shaken Roberto Michelleti appeared before on CNN, denying that the Zelaya was in the country and claiming that the news was an invention of "media terrorism" to stir people up and provoke a huge mobilization. "It's not true. He (Zelaya) is relaxing in a suite in Managua," Micheletti told the press with a chuckle. He later added that if the news turned out to be true, Zelaya would be arrested.

By that time, Zelaya's return had already been confirmed. As the coup chief went into denial, Guatemalan President Alvaro Colom confirmed the news, stating that he hoped this would mean the end of the coup. US State Department spokesperson Ian Kelly confirmed the presence of Zelaya in Honduras in a brief statement calling for all sides to avoid violence, and President Chavez of Venezuela praised Zelaya for what he called his "peaceful and courageous" return. Zelaya is reportedly meeting with resistance leaders at this moment.

By showing up without violent confrontations at the Brazilian Embassy before thousands of cheering supporters, Zelaya plays his strongest cards. As most eyes were on the Obama adminsitration—and with good reason given its power in affecting economic and political sanctions—Brazil has been a low-profile but high-impact actor in the drama. Its power as a regional leader carries clout not only with other nations throughout Latin American but also with the United States, which cannot risk strained relations with the South American giant.

Hondurans are expected to continue to arrive in Tegucigalpa from all over the country. This massive display of support also strengthens Zelaya's hand. His most important base and chance for restoration has been in the popular mobilizations that have not missed a day since June 28.

Zelaya's peaceful journey and bloodless return also underline the non-violent character of the resistance movement since the beginning. The president gained the capital without provoking confrontation, thus taking the wind out of the sails of the State Department's previous reasons for opposing his return. Now he is back in the capital, close to a return to power—a condition of the San Jose Accords. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has no excuse for not supporting Zelaya's return and efforts at internal reconciliation.

© 2009 America's Program

Laura Carlsen (lcarlsen(at)ciponline.org) is director of the Americas Policy Program (www.americaspolicy.org) in Mexico City, where she has been an analyst and writer for two decades. She is also a Foreign Policy In Focus columnist.
User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Tue Sep 22, 2009 9:07 am

http://quotha.net/node/328

Clinton's colonialist games

Tue, 09/22/2009 - 00:13 — AP

Clinton and Arias had a brief press conference today. The transcript is available at http://www.state.gov. It was little better that her outrageous claim, earlier this summer, that Zelaya, on attempting to return to his country as legitimate president (and Honduran citizen) was acting "recklessly." In fact, it may have been worse. A brief point-by-point of what's so wrong with it:

    Today, of course, we talked about Honduras and the return of President Zelaya. Certainly, the United States supports the San Jose Accords that President Arias negotiated, but it’s imperative that dialogue begin, that there be a channel of communication between President Zelaya and the de facto regime in Honduras. And it’s also imperative that the return of President Zelaya does not lead to any conflict or violence, but instead, that everyone act in a peaceful way to try to find some common ground.
Okay, first of all, there was no accord, and no real negotiation. The de facto government never agreed to even consider the points in the Arias plan, despite the fact that Zelaya agreed to all of them (something the resistance will never accept- I'll get to that).

Second, again with the implication that Zelaya is responsible for violence. Only one side has been doing the killing, the raping, the beating. No one but they are to blame for their actions.

Third, common ground? Honestly, the only common ground is their shared use of the rhetoric of democracy- the difference there, of course, is that only one side comes close to practicing it. And think about it. If someone came to your home, forced you out at gunpoint and proceeded to make off with all your plumbing and furniture to sell on the cheap and pay for a Miami vacation, would you take Hillary Clinton seriously when she told you to find "common ground"?

    ...now that President Zelaya is back, it would be opportune to restore him to his position under appropriate circumstances, get on with the election that is currently scheduled for November, have a peaceful transition of presidential authority, and get Honduras back to constitutional and democratic order in a very – on a very clear path toward that goal.
"Appropriate circumstances", Madame Secretary? Those being denying the Honduran people the constitutional assembly that they are demanding? Stripped of any power? And get on with the election? When the two principal candidates are complicit in massive human rights violations, when they are complicit in--by your own belated definition--a coup? And I'd like to point out that "democratic order" is an oxymoron. Democracy is disorderly. "Constitutional order" on the other hand, can be as fascist as you want it to be.

    Well, we have certainly communicated very directly our expectation that there will be order and no provocation on either side. This is not just a one-sided request. It goes to both sides. Both sides have supporters who need to be restrained and careful in their actions in the days ahead.
"Both sides have supporters." This comment shows a complete, willful misunderstanding of the resistance. The resistance is its side. The resistance is not made up of Zelaya supporters; it is made up of resisters. Again, a profound misunderstanding of democratic process. No one's giving orders, certainly not Zelaya. This is a setup, so that with just one or two agent provocateurs, Clinton can chastise Zelaya for not keeping "his" supporters in check. It also continues the fiction, reiterated throughout her brief speech, that there are two sides that are parallel. That's like saying we've got two sides in U.S. society: serial killers and potential victims.

    But as President Arias said, now is the moment for the two sides to try to work out an agreement to the benefit of the people of Honduras. And as President Arias said, it’s hard to think about how they will come up with something other than the San Jose Accords. They’re – they represent an enormous amount of time, effort, and participation by both sides.
Again, Micheletti's government has never taken these accords seriously, while Zelaya has shown them far more respect than they deserve. For the impunity clause alone, they are a non-starter. Central Americans have been suffering the effects of impunity for decades. If it weren't for impunity, the assassins of the 1980s would not have been directing the repression for the de facto government. There can be no impunity for political assassination, and all those who have supported and profited from this de facto government are implicated.

    We have warned – we have spoken directly to multiple parties and very clearly said that there had to be calm and peace in the streets. I think that the government imposed a curfew, we just learned, to try to get people off the streets so that there couldn't be unforeseen developments. But there ultimately in the next hours has to be some effort to bring the parties together to resolve this between them.

"Warned." She's speaking from...which...higher moral ground? From which place of authority? But the most outrageous of all, Clinton supports the imprisonment of the Honduran people, enforced by weapons of the state, for their own protection. At least she's consistent there, supporting the incarceration of civilians who have committed no crime in Gaza and Honduras.
User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 153 guests