The True Story of Area 51's UFOs

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

The True Story of Area 51's UFOs

Postby MinM » Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:59 pm

Keith Thomson: The True Story of Area 51's UFOs

In 1968, 31-year-old hypersonic flight specialist Thornton "T.D." Barnes reported to Groom Lake, the remote Southern Nevada military base also known as Area 51.

He began work on the CIA's top-secret Project OXCART. Over the next seven years, he and many of his colleagues knew one another only by aliases. For additional secrecy, several of them lived in California, commuting to work each day by plane.

Barnes' cover permitted him to go home to nearby Beatty, Nevada, but he couldn't tell his wife, Doris, what he did at work. She only knew that it was top-secret. His children knew even less. "They got used to it," he recalls. "They grew up not expecting me to talk shop when I came home. None of them knew until two years ago, when it was declassified."

He means the CIA's September 2007 declassification of its Groom Lake aircraft testing, new information in spite of which questions remain. To say the least. Area 51 still is heard in the same breath as Roswell, Amityville and Loch Ness.

Why?

Aerospace historian Michael Schratt suspects that extraterrestrial technology was utilized at Area 51 and remains secret "because it will make every man, woman and child on the planet energy independent." Schratt's theories gained some prominence in July 2007 when he produced the following photograph:
Image
During a recent interview, Schratt told me that the picture in fact is "a computer-generated forensic composite" that he commissioned. [To see the undoctored original photo, click here.]

But there were UFOs at Area 51, according to Barnes.

"We were the UFOs," he says. "We were, to a great extent, the sightings being reported."


The flying objects in question include the family of spy planes known as Blackbirds, technological marvels that could fly at heights of 90,000 feet (or about three times the altitude of DC-9s more commonly seen in that era) and speeds near 2,500 mph (think ten football fields in a second), figures that decimated prior records and enabled U.S. reconnaissance photography that arguably tipped the balance of power in the Cold War. Also of note: Although conceived in the 1950s, the sleek jets would not look out of place in the latest George Lucas offering.

So it's little wonder that they were unidentifiable.

Says Barnes, "This posed a great problem to investigators having to explain a sighting without revealing it to be a super secret CIA or Air Force project."

Barnes and company were forced to conceive all manner of cover stories.

Now, with the declassification, he can tell the truth.

Currently President of the Area 51 alumni group Roadrunners Internationale, Barnes has started a website dedicated to the legacy of OXCART and the ensuing Operation Black Shield. "I am trying to make it possible for a lot of people who never got to tell their stories to do so now that the Oxcart project has been declassified," he told me.

For the same reason, he's spearheading an oral history project at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, enabling his fellow Roadrunners to share their experiences in great detail.

Like Barnes, many Roadrunners have children and grandchildren unaware of what they did for a living, let alone their heroics. When the tape starts to roll, Barnes relates, "A lot of them, on finally getting to share their stories, do so with such pent-up emotion that they literally break down in tears."

To hear the interviews, go to the UNLV digital collections. For more of OXCART and other war stories, check out roadrunnersinternationale.com. Barnes' own site is area51specialprojects.com.

Also, post your Area 51 question in the comments section below. Mr. Barnes will log on and try to provide an answer unless it reveals, as he puts it, "anything that might still be classified or that could be of use to our enemies."
Image
The SR-71 reconnaissance aircraft, part of the "Blackbird" family begun with OXCART's A-12
Image
Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/keith-tho ... 48249.html

via http://coverthistory.blogspot.com/2009/ ... orian.html
Earth-704509
User avatar
MinM
 
Posts: 3287
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:16 pm
Location: Mont Saint-Michel
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby freemason9 » Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:32 pm

Well, yes, everyone knew of the SR-71's a very long time ago. Why is this news? And what does it have to do with unlimited energy?
The real issue is that there is extremely low likelihood that the speculations of the untrained, on a topic almost pathologically riddled by dynamic considerations and feedback effects, will offer anything new.
User avatar
freemason9
 
Posts: 1701
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 9:07 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The True Story of Area 51's UFOs

Postby elfismiles » Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:30 am

MinM wrote:Keith Thomson


For the record Keith Thompson's book Angels and Aliens is the shiznit!

Image
http://www.amazon.com/Angels-Aliens-Kei ... 0449908372
User avatar
elfismiles
 
Posts: 8512
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (4)

Re: The True Story of Area 51's UFOs

Postby monster » Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:54 am

elfismiles wrote:
MinM wrote:Keith Thomson


For the record Keith Thompson's book Angels and Aliens is the shiznit!


Thanks, definitely ordering this.
"I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline."
User avatar
monster
 
Posts: 1712
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 4:55 pm
Location: Everywhere
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby exojuridik » Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:59 am

I still can't see how cases of UFO high strangeness can be explained away by disc shaped convential craft and SR-71's. Whatever it was that I witnessed might've been a crypto-terrestial sky-fish or a multi-dimensional cthonic beast but it wasn't anything resembling a nut-and-bolt military craft. Unless, of course, they can make them appear as shimmering toroidal fields of non-color.

I don't think that the significant indicators of an alien presence resemble the conventional 50's "space invader" model, however, stories attributing flying saucers to experimental craft only seem to redirect our attention to the newtonian and euclidian manifestations of the other. These accounts also beg the witnesses to place even the most otherwordly sightings under the rubric of US military aegis. This perceptual framing serves as a well-tested foundation for tertiary level conceptual manipulation.
"Memory believes before knowing remembers. Believes longer than recollects, longer than knowing even wonders."
User avatar
exojuridik
 
Posts: 258
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 9:40 pm
Location: South of No North
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby 8bitagent » Sat Nov 07, 2009 4:33 am

exojuridik wrote:I still can't see how cases of UFO high strangeness can be explained away by disc shaped convential craft and SR-71's. Whatever it was that I witnessed might've been a crypto-terrestial sky-fish or a multi-dimensional cthonic beast but it wasn't anything resembling a nut-and-bolt military craft. Unless, of course, they can make them appear as shimmering toroidal fields of non-color.

I don't think that the significant indicators of an alien presence resemble the conventional 50's "space invader" model, however, stories attributing flying saucers to experimental craft only seem to redirect our attention to the newtonian and euclidian manifestations of the other. These accounts also beg the witnesses to place even the most otherwordly sightings under the rubric of US military aegis. This perceptual framing serves as a well-tested foundation for tertiary level conceptual manipulation.


Don't you know? Every strange high weirdness or UFO encounter
is all just "high level Pentagon military CIA psyops"!
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Those mile long triangles, flying humanoid creatures over Mexico Romania and Serbia, and all Forteana...all the CIA!

I think it's funny how desperately how half the conspiracy crowd is hellbent on "proving" all forms of high weirdness and UFOs are all government psyops...
How do they explain the little men seen at many of these events?

In my mind the Mothman flap, late 70's Brazil encounters, and 1994 Zimbabwe school event are all genuine...though I can *see* why people would want to discredit everything as "psyops"...makes the world much less frightening and strange.

From my guess, the US government was frightened/unnerved by all the UFO stuff(especially the 1941-1950's period)
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12244
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby LilyPatToo » Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:19 pm

For me that "Hey, it's all intel/psy-ops" stage was just that--a stage. Since I'd started out in True Believer Alien Abductee Land, it was a huge thing to read Cannon's The Controllers and finally be able to clearly see the all-too-human meddling in many people's lives--my own included.

But then I read Dolan's UFOs and the National Security State (book 1) and had to once again revise my opinion to a degree. There have been too many solid reports by reliable witnesses for too many years to all be accounted for by US black ops aviation projects.

I suspect that a lot of people who've never experienced any high-strangeness events in their lives find it infinitely easier to go with denial and to put it all down to the machinations of the psy-ops folks. That way, fewer people will ridicule them (though of course some still will, since psy-ops isn't "believed in" by most folks) and they can wear smug smirks and feel superior each time there's a UFO sighting or someone "loses some time" and concludes they've been abducted by aliens.

The UFO I saw back in the mid-60's during a "flap" in my hometown could have been either--a psy-op or the real thing. I'll probably never know for certain which it was, which annoys the heck out of me. I currently think that the US government is not monolithic and suspect that there are pockets of people within it who know a heck of a lot more about what's really going on than most.

I also know individuals whose word I trust who've had definitely non-human/non-governmental/intel abduction events and UFO sightings. But the majority of cases I've run into online and locally here in the Bay Area of California reek of human intel exploitation. So I guess the most rational stance I can come up with is to be as informed as possible and to be flexible/willing to change your opinion. RI is a real help in staying informed and providing a variety of opinions. But, as in so many other areas where the intel boys have meddled, the waters are horrifically muddied. Hate that.

LilyPat
User avatar
LilyPatToo
 
Posts: 1474
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 3:08 pm
Location: Oakland, CA USA
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby barracuda » Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:26 pm

8bitagent wrote:Mothman flap


That's pretty funny.
The most dangerous traps are the ones you set for yourself. - Phillip Marlowe
User avatar
barracuda
 
Posts: 12890
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 175 guests