Pennsylvania judges accused of jailing kids for cash

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Pennsylvania judges accused of jailing kids for cash

Postby yathrib » Wed Feb 11, 2009 5:54 pm

Privatized jails involved. Isn't capitalism wonderful.

-Y



WILKES-BARRE, Pa. – For years, the juvenile court system in Wilkes-Barre operated like a conveyor belt: Youngsters were brought before judges without a lawyer, given hearings that lasted only a minute or two, and then sent off to juvenile prison for months for minor offenses.

The explanation, prosecutors say, was corruption on the bench.

In one of the most shocking cases of courtroom graft on record, two Pennsylvania judges have been charged with taking millions of dollars in kickbacks to send teenagers to two privately run youth detention centers.

"I've never encountered, and I don't think that we will in our lifetimes, a case where literally thousands of kids' lives were just tossed aside in order for a couple of judges to make some money," said Marsha Levick, an attorney with the Philadelphia-based Juvenile Law Center, which is representing hundreds of youths sentenced in Wilkes-Barre.

Prosecutors say Luzerne County Judges Mark Ciavarella and Michael Conahan took $2.6 million in payoffs to put juvenile offenders in lockups run by PA Child Care LLC and a sister company, Western PA Child Care LLC. The judges were charged on Jan. 26 and removed from the bench by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court shortly afterward.

No company officials have been charged, but the investigation is still going on.

The high court, meanwhile, is looking into whether hundreds or even thousands of sentences should be overturned and the juveniles' records expunged.

Among the offenders were teenagers who were locked up for months for stealing loose change from cars, writing a prank note and possessing drug paraphernalia. Many had never been in trouble before. Some were imprisoned even after probation officers recommended against it.

Many appeared without lawyers, despite the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark 1967 ruling that children have a constitutional right to counsel.

The judges are scheduled to plead guilty to fraud Thursday in federal court. Their plea agreements call for sentences of more than seven years behind bars.

Ciavarella, 58, who presided over Luzerne County's juvenile court for 12 years, acknowledged last week in a letter to his former colleagues, "I have disgraced my judgeship. My actions have destroyed everything I worked to accomplish and I have only myself to blame." Ciavarella, though, has denied he got kickbacks for sending youths to prison.

Conahan, 56, has remained silent about the case.

Many Pennsylvania counties contract with privately run juvenile detention centers, paying them either a fixed overall fee or a certain amount per youth, per day.

In Luzerne County, prosecutors say, Conahan shut down the county-run juvenile prison in 2002 and helped the two companies secure rich contracts worth tens of millions of dollars, at least some of that dependent on how many juveniles were locked up.

One of the contracts — a 20-year agreement with PA Child Care worth an estimated $58 million — was later canceled by the county as exorbitant.

The judges are accused of taking payoffs between 2003 and 2006.

Robert J. Powell co-owned PA Child Care and Western PA Child Care until June. His attorney, Mark Sheppard, said his client was the victim of an extortion scheme.

"Bob Powell never solicited a nickel from these judges and really was a victim of their demands," he said. "These judges made it very plain to Mr. Powell that he was going to be required to pay certain monies."

For years, youth advocacy groups complained that Ciavarella was ridiculously harsh and ran roughshod over youngsters' constitutional rights. Ciavarella sent a quarter of his juvenile defendants to detention centers from 2002 to 2006, compared with a statewide rate of one in 10.

The criminal charges confirmed the advocacy groups' worst suspicions and have called into question all the sentences he pronounced.

Hillary Transue did not have an attorney, nor was she told of her right to one, when she appeared in Ciavarella's courtroom in 2007 for building a MySpace page that lampooned her assistant principal.

Her mother, Laurene Transue, worked for 16 years in the child services department of another county and said she was certain Hillary would get a slap on the wrist. Instead, Ciavarella sentenced her to three months; she got out after a month, with help from a lawyer.

"I felt so disgraced for a while, like, what do people think of me now?" said Hillary, now 17 and a high school senior who plans to become an English teacher.

Laurene Transue said Ciavarella "was playing God. And not only was he doing that, he was getting money for it. He was betraying the trust put in him to do what is best for children."

Kurt Kruger, now 22, had never been in trouble with the law until the day police accused him of acting as a lookout while his friend shoplifted less than $200 worth of DVDs from Wal-Mart. He said he didn't know his friend was going to steal anything.

Kruger pleaded guilty before Ciavarella and spent three days in a company-run juvenile detention center, plus four months at a youth wilderness camp run by a different operator.

"Never in a million years did I think that I would actually get sent away. I was completely destroyed," said Kruger, who later dropped out of school. He said he wants to get his record expunged, earn his high school equivalency diploma and go to college.

"I got a raw deal, and yeah, it's not fair," he said, "but now it's 100 times bigger than me."
yathrib
 
Posts: 1880
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 11:44 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby beeline » Thu Feb 12, 2009 5:46 pm

Disgraceful. Do you have a link?
User avatar
beeline
 
Posts: 2024
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 4:10 pm
Location: Killadelphia, PA
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby marmot » Thu Feb 12, 2009 5:59 pm

sad..
marmot
 
Posts: 2354
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 11:52 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:06 pm

Catherine Austin Fitts wrote up a good explanation of how Wall Street invested in privatized prisons and created a financial incentive to perpetuate barbaric mandatory drug sentencing laws.

So what these two judges did is institutionalized on a national scale.
CIA runs mainstream media since WWII:
news rooms, movies/TV, publishing
...
Disney is CIA for kidz!
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby barracuda » Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:12 pm

http://thephoenix.com/Boston/News/73092 ... ouse-bloc/

    Freedom watch: Jailhouse bloc
    The real reason law-and-order types love mandatory-minimum sentencing? It's money in their pockets.


    With aromatic puffs of change, Bay State stoners rejoiced on Election Day. But even the haziest of revelers may have missed the full significance of Question 2, a statewide ballot initiative to decriminalize marijuana possession in small amounts. Not only will this bring more humane and responsible marijuana laws, it will also suppress — however slightly — an insidious, contemporary offshoot of what President Dwight Eisenhower famously referred to as the "military-industrial complex": the idea that if private industry and government joined in promoting ever-increasing defense spending, war as well as national bankruptcy were more likely.

    Almost a half-century later, that mindset has extended to both the local and federal law-and-order sectors, which have argued for, and experienced, virtually unabated growth. Today, law-enforcement groups regularly lobby against criminal-punishment reforms, and for the creation of new criminal statutes and overly harsh prison sentences. While these efforts are cloaked as calls for public safety, they are essentially creating more business for themselves.

    The problem has become so widespread that some private correctional corporations — companies that subcontract services, and even privately owned jails and prisons, to all levels of government — have even lobbied the government to enact and maintain ever broader criminal laws and higher sentences. Those private prisons are now rolling in the profit, and taking on more prisoners every day as federal and state prisons run out of room to house their inmates.

    But these lobbyists' success — and that of various law-enforcement groups — has given rise to a veritable "prison-industrial complex" that not only uses fear to suppress these groups' true intentions — it leaves taxpayers footing the bill.

More at link.
The most dangerous traps are the ones you set for yourself. - Phillip Marlowe
User avatar
barracuda
 
Posts: 12890
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby ninakat » Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:13 pm

Here's a link:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29142654/

What a horror show.
User avatar
ninakat
 
Posts: 2904
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:38 pm
Location: "Nothing he's got he really needs."
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Username » Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:24 am

~
Alternet

How Two Former PA Judges Got Millions in Kickbacks to Send Juveniles to Private Prisons

By Amy Goodman, Democracy Now!.
Posted February 17, 2009


The judges even jailed some of the young people over the objections of their probation officers.

Amy Goodman: An unprecedented case of judicial corruption is unfolding in Pennsylvania. Several hundred families have filed a class-action lawsuit against two former judges who have pleaded guilty to taking bribes in return for placing youths in privately owned jails. Judges Mark Ciavarella and Michael Conahan are said to have received $2.6 million for ensuring that juvenile suspects were jailed in prisons operated by the companies Pennsylvania Child Care and a sister company, Western Pennsylvania Child Care. Some of the young people were jailed over the objections of their probation officers. An estimated 5,000 juveniles have been sentenced by Ciavarella since the scheme started in 2002.

In addition to the jailing of the youths, the judges also admitted to helping "facilitate" the construction of private jails. The U.S. attorney for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, Martin Carlson, unveiled the charges last month.

Martin Carlson: wrote: These payments were made to the judges, it is alleged, in return for discretionary acts by the judges favoring these businesses, acts relating to the construction, expansion, operation of these juvenile facilities and acts relating to the placement of juveniles in these facilities.


Amy Goodman: On Thursday, Judges Ciavarella and Conahan entered guilty pleas on charges of wire fraud and income tax fraud. They're currently free on a $1 million bail bond pending sentencing. Their plea agreements call for jail sentences of more than seven years. No charges have been filed against the private prisons that paid the bribes.

Pennsylvania's Supreme Court has appointed an outside judge to review all the cases tried by Ciavarella and Conahan. But the case has prompted calls for broader reforms of the juvenile justice system in Pennsylvania and nationwide.

We're joined now by two of the thousands of youths jailed by the corrupt judges. On the line with us from Scranton, Pennsylvania, eighteen-year-old Jamie Quinn is with us. She spent more than eleven months in a privately run juvenile prison camp after being sentenced by Judge Mark Ciavarella as a first-time offender. Also on the line in the nearby town of Wilkes-Barre is twenty-two-year-old Kurt Kruger. Another first-time offender, he spent more than four months in a privately run prison--juvenile prison camp after also being sentenced by Judge Ciavarella.

And joining us in a studio in Philadelphia is Bob Schwartz. He is a co-founder and executive director of the Juvenile Law Center, which helped expose the corrupt judges and is now involved in the class-action suit brought on behalf of the jailed youths' families.

We asked PA Child Care, the main private jail company linked to the bribes, to come on the broadcast. We were directed to an attorney who didn't respond to our request.

Bob Schwartz, let's start with you. When did all this begin to be revealed? How did it all happen?

Bob Schwartz: Thanks, Amy, and thanks for having Kurt, Jamie and me on your show.

This has been going on, we believe, in Luzerne County since 2003. It came to Juvenile Law Center's attention a couple of years ago, when we heard from the mother of one of the girls whom we ended up representing, a young woman named Hillary Transue, who was brought into court, found guilty, sent away for an internet parody of an assistant principal at her high school. Her mother found us, and when we were able to bring a habeas corpus petition on Hillary's behalf, she told our attorneys that she wasn't the only one who had been locked up by Judge Ciavarella, that there were lots of other kids in the same situation. That was a couple of years ago.

And we began investigating and found that Luzerne County had half of the waivers of counsel in Pennsylvania of all the cases in which lawyers were waived by young people in juvenile court. Hillary had, unknown to her, signed a paper, her mother had signed a paper, giving up her right to a lawyer. That made the 90-second hearing that she had in front of Judge Ciavarella pretty much of a kangaroo court. So, she was sent away. We investigated and last year, about a year ago, brought a petition before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court asking them to take a look at all of the cases in which kids were tried and adjudicated delinquent and many sent away without a lawyer. We thought that was the problem. That turned out to be the tip of the iceberg. When we filed, it turned out that the FBI began its investigation and found the corruption that you spoke about at the top of this segment.

AG: And just very briefly, Hillary -- explain what she did. A cartoon?

BS: She had done a -- I think a MySpace parody … of an assistant principal, a paragraph or two, with internet humor of an adolescent variety, finishing by saying, "I hope that Mrs. Smith" -- or Jones -- "has a sense of humor." It turned out that the assistant principal didn't, we gather, at least, complained to the police, who filed a harassment petition against Hillary. This is the kind of case, like Kurt's and like Jamie's, that never should have been in court in the first place, let alone get to a trial. Juvenile court is not designed for this kind of adolescent misbehavior. The cases should have been diverted entirely. Instead, Hillary and Kurt and Jamie and thousands of others were used by the court for profit, while many people over many years stood by watching.

AG: I want to go to Jamie Quinn right now. Jamie, welcome to Democracy Now!

Jamie Quinn: Thank you.

AG: It's good to have you with us. Are you speaking to us from your house?

JQ: Yes.

AG: So, you were in jail for almost a year. Where were you imprisoned? What was the name of this juvenile prison camp?

JQ: Well, first, I was told that I was only going to be at PA Child Care for up to three days. I was there for a week and then got sent to a military boot camp called VisionQuest in Quincy Township. It's about an hour and a half away. And I spent most of my time there. And then I got FTA'ed from there and sent back to PA Child Care --

AG: And "FTA'ed" means … ?

JQ: Failure to adjust. And then I got sent back to PA Child Care, was there for about two weeks, because they said they couldn't find a bed for me, and they didn't know where to place me. And then I went to a step-down program. They told me I needed to go there in order to be able to go back into the community. And I went to Wilkes-Barre, a place in Wilkes-Barre which is called Bridgeview.

AG: Now, just step back for a second, Jamie.

JQ: OK.

AG: Tell us why you were convicted.

JQ: Well, I was about fourteen years old, and I got into an argument with one of my friends. And all that happened was just a basic fight. She slapped me in the face, and I did the same thing back. There was no marks, no witnesses, nothing. It was just her word against my word. My only charges were simple assault and harassment. And I didn't even know that charges were pressed against me until I had to go down to the intake and probation and fill out a whole bunch of paperwork.

AG: Wait. So that is what you went to jail for almost a year for?

JQ: Yes.

AG: How old were you?

JQ: I was fourteen, turning fifteen, and my court hearing was December 20th, three days before my birthday.

...

AG: We're talking about the case of two judges who have pled guilty to receiving $2.6 million in return for placing youths in privately owned jails. Today, we're speaking with two of those youths. Jamie Quinn just told us her story. We now turn to Kurt Kruger.

Kurt, tell us how you ended up in one of these privately run juvenile prison camps for more than four months. How did you get there?

Kurt Kruger: Well, first off, thank you for having us.

Basically, I was with a girl who was shoplifting DVDs from a Wal-Mart, local Wal-Mart, and we were caught, and I was considered the lookout. And it was basically just stupid kid stuff. The police came to the Wal-Mart and then called our parents. A week after this happened at Wal-Mart, they sent us letters that we were to appear in the probation office for interviews so they could decide court dates. And I then, after that interview, moved out of my father's house because of personal problems. And at some point, a appearance in court did come to my house, a letter did come to my house, but I had no contact with my father, so I had no idea. The only idea I had of anything that was going on was that the girl who I was with, who was actually the one shoplifting, never received a letter of a court appearance or anything, never heard anything else about the case. So I thought that it was done and over with.

I was living with a friend for awhile, and I started going to school in the fall. I was eighteen at the time when I started going to school. I was seventeen when the incident occurred at Wal-Mart. I was in school one day, and I was called up to the probation officer's office in the school, and there was a police officer there waiting for me, and he handcuffed me and led me out of the school and put me in the squad car and drove me up to PA Child Care in Pittston.

Since it was a Friday, I had to wait over the weekend to go in front of Judge Ciavarella, so I spent three days in PA Child Care, thinking the entire time that I screwed up but I was just going to get probation, at the worst. And I was then sentenced in a 90-second hearing. I was sentenced to Camp Adams for a minimum of ninety days. And I was never offered a lawyer, never explained my rights to a lawyer or what benefits it would have. I was just sent away to Camp Adams for at least ninety days, and I spent the better part of four-and-a-half months there.

AG: And tell us about the judge, Mark Ciavarella, who sent you there and your reaction when you heard that he pled guilty.

KK: Shock, I guess. I mean, it was expected that he was going to plead guilty for this last week, but when all of this first started coming up, it was just absolute shock, because I had thought that I had just gotten a raw deal, that, you know, maybe possibly he was in a bad mood that day or something. I had never thought that the scope and the scale of this entire -- of this entire investigation and what has come of it.

AG: How old were you when you went to jail?

KK: I was eighteen at the time.

AG: Jamie, how did going to jail for almost a year, after your fight with your friend -- how did that affect your life?

JQ: It affected me dramatically. I mean, you know, you think it wouldn't, but it really has. I mean, I've lost friends over this. People looked at me different when I came out, thought I was a bad person, because I was gone for so long. My family started splitting up, and in my personal opinion, I think it's because I was away and got locked up and was, I thought, getting, you know, punished for what I had did, which I don't think I should have.

And I was just -- I'm still struggling in school, because the schooling system in facilities like these places are just horrible. Everybody gets put in the same level, and it's just horrible. I'm still struggling. I'm graduating this year. And math is still not my favorite subject. I was like an A-B student before I went, and now I'm just struggling with Bs and Cs.

AG: You began cutting yourself in jail?

JQ: Yes.

AG: Why do you think you started doing that?

JQ: Honestly … I didn't even know what it was until I was sent to VisionQuest. And I was never depressed, I was never put on meds before. I went there, and they just started putting meds on me, and I didn't even know what they were. They said if I didn't take them, I wasn't following my program. So, in my opinion, I think that it was the meds at the time. I mean, I was never medicated in my life nor diagnosed with depression. And that's what I believe happened.

AG: You were sent to the hospital three times --

JQ: Yes.

AG: -- during that almost year?

JQ: Yeah, Chambersburg Hospital.

AG: Bob Schwartz, the plan now, and how much representation do young people have in Pennsylvania?

BS: Well, in most Pennsylvania counties, almost all kids have a lawyer all the time. Pennsylvania law requires all youth to have a lawyer at the time of the first hearing before a detention officer to a judge at every subsequent hearing. Pennsylvania has granted kids, in many ways, more rights to lawyers than many states.

On the other hand, in Luzerne County, that was a right that was largely ignored. Lawyers doing their job would get in the way of this railroad from the bar or the court to Pennsylvania Child Care and other placements that was taking place in Luzerne County at the time. One of the things that we hope that will come out of this is that it will be much harder for any youth to appear before any judge without a lawyer in this state.

Meanwhile, there are several proceedings that are happening at the same time. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has finally agreed to hear the case. They took the case after the U.S. attorney acted at the end of January, and there will now be an examination of all 5,000 or so cases that took place in Luzerne County from 2003 forward. There are also going to be multiple civil rights actions in federal court in Scranton, going after not only the judges but others who conspired with them to hurt kids like Jamie and Kurt. What happened to them should never happen to a child in the United States of America.

AG: And the role of the police in the schools, very briefly, in this, Bob Schwartz?

BS: Well, the police were ordered to make an arrest. You know, it really varies in so many ways. They were obviously told in Kurt's case to bring him to court, because there was a court warrant issued, because he had failed to appear for a hearing that he didn't know about. They might have acted differently, but certainly the probation department and the court should have acted differently. The probation department was intimidated by the judges. They are court employees. And one of the things that the information of the U.S. attorney claims is that Judge Ciavarella and Judge Conahan had probation officers change their recommendations, ordered them to change their recommendations, in order to make sure that they had enough kids to fill slots at these childcare facilities.

AG: And the childcare facilities themselves? They paid the bribes.

BS: They paid, and the federal proceedings will bring to light what their role actually was. Right now, they have not been charged criminally, but they are inevitably a defendant in every civil rights proceeding.

AG: So, we're talking about 5,000 kids like Jamie, like Kurt. How much jail time do these judges face?

BS: They've pled and are expecting to get eighty-seven months in federal prison. That's a little more than seven years, if the judge accepts the plea bargain.

AG: Jamie, how do you feel about that?

JQ: It just makes me really question other authority figures and people that we're supposed to look up to and trust. I mean, Ciavarella has been a judge for a long time, from what I know, and a well-respected one, is what I thought. And obviously not. It just really makes me question and not trust other people. I mean, if someone like Judge Ciavarella could do this, then it makes me believe that anyone can betray the law and -- I don't know.

AG: And Kurt, your final comment?

KK: Well, basically, I just want to say that finally there's some sort of closure, for me, at least, coming from the lawsuits from the Juvenile Law Center. There's at least a little bit of closure for me, and I hope that's the same case for everyone who's involved.

AG: Well, Kurt Kruger and Jamie Quinn, thanks so much for being with us, and Bob Schwartz, as well. I want to turn now to the commentary that alerted us to this story, of Mumia Abu-Jamal. He's been on Pennsylvania's death row for more than twenty-five years.

Mumia Abu-Jamal: "With Judges Like These." In Pennsylvania's Luzerne County, there are nine judges of the Court of Common Pleas. Two of them just pleaded guilty to a conspiracy to convict and sentence juveniles to a private prison, so that they could get kickbacks from the prisons' builders and owners. According to published accounts, Judge Mark A. Ciavarella and Senior Judge Michael T. Conahan sent hundreds of boys and girls to the private facility and pocketed some $2.5 million in kickbacks. This was accomplished not merely because of the venal greed of the judges, but because virtually none of the children were provided with legal representation.

When the Philadelphia-based Juvenile Law Center filed a petition in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, calling the county's practice of adjudicating and sentencing some 250 kids to jail without legal representation unconstitutional, the state's highest court denied the petition on January 8th. A month later, they changed their minds, vacating the denial. What transpired in the interim? Well, for one thing, the two judges pleaded guilty to federal charges of wire service fraud. Hundreds of children get sucked into jail after clearly unconstitutional proceedings with no legal representation, and the state supreme court doesn't even raise an eyebrow. The media reports on this outrage, and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court expresses a little interest.

This is the nature of judging these days, when even kids are expendable fodder for the prison-industrial complex. Luzerne County is the state's tenth largest county with just over 300,000 souls. At least 22 percent of their judges have admitted being corrupt in the sordid business of selling the freedom of poor children for profit.

From death row, this is Mumia Abu-Jamal.


AG: And we thank the Prison Radio Project in San Francisco and Noelle Hanrahan.
~
Username
 
Posts: 794
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:27 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Pele'sDaughter » Tue Jul 28, 2009 4:47 pm

Wronged Juveniles May Lose Right to Sue

In a bizarre twist to a closely watched case that rocked the Pennsylvania legal system this year, thousands of youths who had to appear before a corrupt county judge are in danger of losing the ability to sue for damages and court fees.

The potential loss stems from a decision by the State Supreme Court in May that it would help the youths move on with their lives by destroying all documents related to their convictions that it deemed faulty. But doing so would hamper the public’s ability to investigate the corruption of the judge, Mark A. Ciavarella Jr., and limit the youths’ ability to sue him.

“This is about destroying evidence,” Marsha Levick, chief legal counsel for the Juvenile Law Center, a public interest law firm in Philadelphia, said after appearing on Monday before Judge A. Richard Caputo of Federal District Court in Scranton, Pa., to ask that the records be preserved.

“Without these documents,” Ms. Levick said, “it would make it nearly impossible for these kids to get justice.”

The Supreme Court has argued that under Pennsylvania law, all copies of a youth’s criminal record must be deleted for it to be expunged.

But last week the Supreme Court amended its May order and agreed to preserve, under seal, copies of the records for the estimated 400 juveniles who are named as plaintiffs in lawsuits against Mr. Ciavarella and had requested copies of the records by a June 1 deadline set by the court.

Lawyers for the youths, however, said that the amended order would not safeguard the records of about 6,100 remaining youths, who either had not been told of their rights stemming from the judicial corruption case or had yet to request their records.

The records deal with the convictions of more than 6,500 youths who appeared from 2003 to 2008 before Mr. Ciavarella, who ran the juvenile court of Luzerne County for 12 years.

In February, Mr. Ciavarella and Michael T. Conahan, a judge on the county’s Court of Common Pleas, pleaded guilty to tax evasion and wire fraud in a scheme that involved sending thousands of juveniles to two private detention centers in exchange for $2.6 million in kickbacks. They had been removed from the bench that month.

Mr. Ciavarella appeared Monday at the federal courthouse to file a motion to dismiss a federal lawsuit against him. He would not comment on whether the records should be preserved.

“I’m sorry that I brought such shame to the bench,” the former judge told a television reporter at the courthouse. “There’s a lot of good people who sit on the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas who don’t deserve to be tarnished by what I did. And, unfortunately, they do get tarnished by that, and that’s wrong because they didn’t do anything wrong. I did; they didn’t.”

Four civil lawsuits, which have been consolidated before Judge Caputo, have already been filed against Mr. Ciavarella and Mr. Conahan.

Lawyers for the juveniles said Monday that the records might be important for them to identify and contact each potential member of the class. They are also needed so that investigators and the public can discern the extent of judicial misconduct, the lawyers said.

Zygmont A. Pines, the Pennsylvania court administrator, wrote in a June 25 letter to Judge Caputo that the main concern of the Supreme Court was “to ensure that tainted convictions of affected juveniles in Luzerne County be undone as expeditiously as possible.”

Mr. Pines also wrote that youths who had not joined any of the lawsuits might not want to have their records preserved.

This month, after Judge Caputo was asked to protect the records, the Supreme Court sent him a letter opposing the move.

On July 2, Judge Caputo denied the request to protect the records, citing federalism prerogatives and concluding that the issue was “best left to the Pennsylvania courts.”

Appearing before him on Monday, lawyers for the juveniles argued that the Supreme Court’s decision last week acknowledged that Pennsylvania law allowed for records to be expunged even if copies were kept under seal for the sake of evidence in later litigation.

“If they are going to preserve the evidence for 400 of the faulty convictions,” Ms. Levick said, “then they should preserve it for all of the faulty convictions.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/28/us/28 ... .html?_r=1
:evil: :x
Don't believe anything they say.
And at the same time,
Don't believe that they say anything without a reason.
---Immanuel Kant
User avatar
Pele'sDaughter
 
Posts: 1917
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 11:45 am
Location: Texas
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby beeline » Fri Oct 30, 2009 11:26 am

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/homepage/20091030_Pa__high_court_tosses__tainted__juvenile_cases.html


Posted on Fri, Oct. 30, 2009

Pa. high court tosses 'tainted' juvenile cases
By John Sullivan and Robert Moran
Inquirer Staff Writers

In an unprecedented move, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court yesterday tossed out thousands of juvenile court cases that were "tainted" by an alleged kickback scheme involving a former Luzerne County judge.
The order affects an estimated 6,500 cases handled by then-Judge Mark A. Ciavarella from 2003 through mid-2008. Only about 100 remain eligible to be retried, and those final cases also could end up being thrown out if the Luzerne County district attorney decides not to proceed.
"The court's far-reaching order is an exceptional response to the most serious judicial scandal in the history of the United States," said Marsha Levick, legal director of the Juvenile Law Center, which led the fight to overturn the cases.

"It's fair to say this is unprecedented and a good day for justice in Pennsylvania."

Hillary Transue, 18, whose juvenile case triggered the legal action that went all the way to the Supreme Court, said she jumped and screamed when she heard the news.

"It's the most phenomenal experience in the entire world," said Transue, who now attends college. "I feel everyone was completely vindicated."
After a 2007 hearing that lasted less than a minute, Ciavarella ordered Transue to serve three months at a wilderness camp for lampooning a school administrator on MySpace. She returned home after a month when her mother contacted the Juvenile Law Center for help.

Her mother, Laurene Transue, said she was "elated."

"To know that justice has been served is incredible," she continued. "I think she's learned that you can trust authority . . . that there is justice and there is also evil in the world."

In Ciavarella's courtroom, juvenile justice was dispensed quickly, often within minutes and without benefit of counsel for the children.

Ciavarella and former Judge Michael T. Conahan are accused of collecting a total of $2.6 million over seven years from a former owner of two for-profit detention centers - one in Luzerne County and the other in Butler County - and their developer.

The ex-judges allegedly helped the detention centers obtain $58 million in contracts, suppressed a critical audit of one of the centers, and closed a competing county-run detention center.

The judges had entered into plea agreements with federal prosecutors, but a federal judge this summer rejected the deals. They withdrew their guilty pleas and were indicted again.

The state Supreme Court in February appointed Berks County Senior Judge Arthur Grim to review Ciavarella's cases.

Grim determined that all juvenile adjudications and consent decrees entered by Ciavarella between Jan. 1, 2003, and May 31, 2008, were "tainted," the Supreme Court said in its ruling.

In March, about 800 of those cases were overturned by the high court.
"Judge Grim refers to the 'pall' that was cast over all juvenile matters presided over by Ciavarella, given his financial interest, and his conduct in cases where juveniles proceeded without counsel," yesterday's ruling says.

"We fully agree that, given the nature and extent of the taint, this Court simply cannot have confidence that any juvenile matter adjudicated by Ciavarella during this period was tried in a fair and impartial manner."
Barry H. Dyller, one of the lawyers representing the juveniles - many now adults - said he hoped that the remaining cases also would be dropped.
Addressing the scope of the high court's ruling and the nature of the scandal, Dyller said: "I've never seen anything like this, and I hope to never see anything like this again."

Levick said the Philadelphia-based Juvenile Law Center would participate in reviews of the remaining cases that could be subject to retrials. The center also has a pending civil case.

Hillary Transue said that Ciavarella was well-known in her small town and that people had told her it was hopeless to proceed against a powerful judge.

The Transue case led the Juvenile Law Center to Jessica Van Reeth, who also was ordered by Ciavarella to serve three months at a wilderness camp. Her father, Jack Van Reeth, said he was thrilled with the high court's action.

Jessica Van Reeth, of Mountain Top, was caught with a lighter and a marijuana pipe when she was 16. Her sentence came after a 90-second hearing, and despite the recommendation of a Juvenile Court officer, who recommended probation due to Jessica's good grades and lack of a prior record.

Jack Van Reeth said his daughter is now a sophomore at Luzerne County Community College. She is on the dean's list and planning a career in criminal justice.
User avatar
beeline
 
Posts: 2024
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 4:10 pm
Location: Killadelphia, PA
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby beeline » Thu Nov 12, 2009 4:36 pm

Commentary
Deferential culture abetted rotten judges
By William C. Kashatus

"See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil" may be a 17th-century Japanese proverb, but it is a way of life today in Luzerne County, where public fear and naivete give free rein to political corruption.

The county's most recent scandal involves former judges Mark A. Ciavarella Jr. and Michael T. Conahan. In one of the most serious violations of children's rights in the history of the American legal system, Ciavarella and Conahan are charged with taking $2.6 million in kickbacks for sending juvenile offenders to two private, for-profit juvenile detention facilities.

An 11-member Interbranch Commission on Juvenile Justice has been created to identify "those who knew but failed to speak" and "those who saw but failed to act." The commission, which held hearings in Wilkes-Barre this week, faces a daunting task, because complicity in the scandal goes beyond even the lawyers, elected officials, school administrators, teachers, probation officers, and prosecutors charged with protecting the children who were victimized.

The parents of the victims are also to blame. They had a responsibility to ask why Ciavarella did not allow legal representation for their children. If they couldn't afford counsel, they should have demanded that the court appoint a public defender, which is a constitutional right. And they should have appealed when their children were incarcerated for what didn't even amount to a misdemeanor.

The reasons for their negligence are deeply rooted. They are products of a regional culture that emphasizes deference to public officials and retribution for those who challenge authority.

Much of the area's population is descended from poorly educated immigrants from Eastern and Southern Europe who worked in a once-prosperous anthracite coal industry. Congressmen, state representatives, and judges were among the most important authority figures in the lives of those immigrants, wielding significant influence and helping them navigate the challenges and uncertainties of their new home.

Their trust was rewarded by figures such as Dan Flood, a pork-barrel congressman who channeled millions of health, education, and welfare dollars into Northeastern Pennsylvania during his 32 years on Capitol Hill.

At the same time, the immigrants feared retribution if they challenged authority of any kind, whether legal or illegal. That helped organized crime take over the coal mines in the 1930s. And public officials looked the other way when the mafia violated state laws, leading to the Knox Mine Disaster of 1959, which virtually killed the anthracite industry and put thousands out of work.

Aspects of this mentality still prevail in Luzerne County. Ciavarella and Conahan realized that and preyed on it.

They established a smoke screen by packing the courthouse staff with relatives and shielding others on the bench from juvenile court proceedings. They knew that school administrators and teachers' unions, who encouraged their "zero tolerance" policy, would mute any criticisms. And even if they were caught, Ciavarella and Conahan planned to hide behind the doctrine of judicial immunity.

The judges' luck ran out in September, when prosecutors secured a 48-count indictment that includes racketeering, bribery, and extortion charges. If convicted on all counts, they could face as much as 597 years in prison.

Let's hope Luzerne County's voters have learned their lesson and will be more vigilant toward the public officials they elect in the future.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

William C. Kashatus is a history professor at Luzerne County Community College and the author of "Dapper Dan Flood: The Controversial Life of a Congressional Power Broker," to be published by Penn State Press in February. He can be contacted at bill@historylive.net.


http://www.philly.com/philly/opinion/20091112_Deferential_culture_abetted_rotten_judges.html
User avatar
beeline
 
Posts: 2024
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 4:10 pm
Location: Killadelphia, PA
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby justdrew » Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:05 pm

so the judge is going to jail now right?

what about the private assholes who ran the bullshit bad-deal-for-the-taxpayer private jail who were paying the kickbacks, they going up the river too?
By 1964 there were 1.5 million mobile phone users in the US
User avatar
justdrew
 
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: unknown
Blog: View Blog (11)

Postby beeline » Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:40 pm

The judges are. Don't know about the kick-backers.
User avatar
beeline
 
Posts: 2024
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 4:10 pm
Location: Killadelphia, PA
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby beeline » Mon Nov 16, 2009 11:46 am

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/pennsylvania/20091113_Another_guilty_plea_in_Luzerne_corruption_probe.html

Posted on Fri, Nov. 13, 2009


Another guilty plea in Luzerne corruption probe

SCRANTON - A deputy clerk in Luzerne County, where a federal corruption probe is in progress, has agreed to plead guilty to taking a bribe.
Federal prosecutors say a contractor took William Brace to New York City and bought him a tailor-made suit worth about $1,500. Prosecutors say the suit was a reward for help in getting a county contract.

The plea agreement filed yesterday says Brace agreed to cooperate in the investigation. Brace was the 17th person to be charged in the county since January as part of the probe. Most of the accused are public officials.

Defense lawyer Joseph Nocito did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment
[url]

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/homep ... abuse.html[/url]

Posted on Wed, Nov. 11, 2009


Luzerne officials deny knowing of abuse
By William Ecenbarger

For The Inquirer

WILKES-BARRE - To the frequent frustration and occasional exasperation of a special panel investigating judicial corruption in Luzerne County, yesterday's testimony gave off the steady and unmistakable sound of the buck being passed.
Phrases like "I was not aware," "Yes, but," and "It was not my responsibility" wafted from the witness chair as officials who oversee the county's courts denied knowing that thousands of adolescents were being locked away, often for petty offenses, after hearings in which they had been effectively denied lawyers.

When Luzerne County District Attorney Jacqueline Musto Carroll challenged the 11 members of the state-appointed Interbranch Commission on Juvenile Justice to "tell me what you do when you have a judge who is a crook," she was promptly interrupted by the questioner-in-chief.

"You report him," interjected John M. Cleland, the commission chairman and a judge on the state Superior Court.

Cleland and his fellow panelists have until May 31 to discover how two former judges, Mark A. Ciavarella Jr. and Michael T. Conahan, managed to get away with what federal prosecutors say was a five-year, $2.8 million kickback conspiracy, a scheme that one juvenile-justice advocacy group called "one of the largest and most serious violations of children's rights in the history of the American legal system."

Musto Carroll said she was unaware that more than half the teenagers whose cases came before Ciavarella did not have legal representation. She said the judge's "zero-tolerance" policy was a result of the 1999 Columbine High School shootings.

"I think Judge Ciavarella was probably doing what he thought he ought to do," the district attorney testified. "I have heard in a number of cases, what he did actually straightened out kids' lives. Some went on to get scholarships and college educations."

That brought an angry response from panel member Robert L. Listenbee, head of the juvenile unit of the Defender Association of Philadelphia. "Ms. Carroll, I remind that you and I as attorneys took an oath to uphold the Constitution. There were children here whose basic constitutional rights were being violated every day. Let's keep that in mind."

Lawyer Kenneth J. Horoho Jr., a commissioner from Pittsburgh, offered a litany of questions about Musto Carroll's having not known or questioned Ciavarella's methods. Horoho concluded, "The bottom line is that 'zero tolerance' went unchallenged by your office."

"Don't worry about Luzerne County," Musto Carroll assured the commission. "As long as I'm here, it's in good hands."

Yesterday's first witness was David W. Lupas, Musto Carroll's predecessor as district attorney and now a county judge, who said that none of his assistants ever brought concerns about Ciavarella's conduct to his attention.

Panel member Dwayne D. Woodruff - the head juvenile judge in Allegheny County, and a former Pittsburgh Steelers safety - noted that 54 percent of the children brought before Ciavarella did not have lawyers. "Would you expect your assistant D.A.s to come to you with that?" Woodruff asked.

"No one came to me," Lupas said.

Cleland interjected, "I could understand a case here and a case there. But 6,000 cases? This went on for years, and it was a massive deprivation of rights. No assistant D.A., no public defender, no private lawyer ever raised a question? That's hard to believe."

Basil G. Russin, who has been chief public defender in Luzerne County since 1980, said that even if he had known the extent of Ciavarella's denial of rights to juvenile defendants, he would not have had many options. "We don't have the time or the money to look into things very deeply. We just do the best we can," he said.

Besides, Russin said, the judges' get-tough stance against juvenile misbehavior had wide public support.

"Everybody loved it. The schools loved it because they got rid of every problem kid. The parents loved it because there were kids they couldn't control. The cops loved it because it got kids off the streets, and the D.A. loved it because they were getting convictions."

In earlier testimony, Sandra Brulo, a former Luzerne County probation official, said she had raised concerns about Ciavarella with her boss, but did not hear back.

"Don't you think you should have taken it further when you didn't get any satisfaction from your supervisor?" asked Ronald P. Williams, a panel member from nearby Wyoming County, raising his arms in amazement.

"I took it to my boss," Brulo replied. "That's as far as I thought I should go."

She testified that probation officers, not attorneys, asked young defendants to sign forms just before they entered Ciavarella's courtroom that waived their right to a lawyer. Commissioner George D. Mosee, a deputy Philadelphia district attorney, asked Brulo if this was a proper role for probation officers.

"We did what the judge instructed us to do," she said.

"Even when their very liberty was at stake?" Mosee asked. Brulo did not answer.

Joseph Massa, senior counsel for the state Judicial Conduct Board, which investigates complaints against judges, told the panel that his agency had acted properly more than two years ago when it referred allegations it received against Ciavarella and Conahan to federal prosecutors.

By not acting on its own, the board allowed the jurists to stay on the bench until they resigned this year. The judges stepped down after a federal grand jury indicted them on racketeering, bribery and fraud charges.

"To allege the [Judicial Conduct Board] members put their heads in the proverbial sand while juveniles in this county were sent to the hoosegow is a disgrace," Massa told the panel.

Ciavarella is accused of taking bribes from operators of two for-profit detention centers in return for sending children to the centers. Conahan is accused of securing lucrative contracts for the private jails, which the state paid according to the numbers of inmates they housed.

Once the scheme was set up, prosecutors say, Ciavarella guaranteed that the jails were filled with a steady stream of juvenile offenders.

Ciavarella and Conahan are awaiting trial. They initially pleaded guilty but withdrew their pleas after a federal judge rejected the terms of their plea agreements.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Seeking Juveniles' Stories
The Juvenile Law Center, the legal advocacy group in Philadelphia that sounded the alarm about unconstitutional practices in Luzerne County's juvenile court, wants to know if similar rights violations are taking place elsewhere in the state.

It is promoting a questionnaire on its Web site, www.jlc.org/shareyourstory, for children or their parents to tell their stories anonymously.

The center is putting together a report for the state panel investigating the scandal in Luzerne County, where judges are accused of taking millions of dollars in kickbacks to place youths in for-profit detention centers.

The law center wants to hear from youths and parents from outside Luzerne County. Their responses will help the center make recommendations for improving the state's youth courts.

The questionnaire covers a number of practices that emerged from the scandal. Among other youths who have landed in a Pennsylvania juvenile court, the center wants to hear from defendants who were referred to juvenile court for an incident that took place at school; were shackled or handcuffed while in court; waived their right to an attorney; or were sent to a for-profit detention center.

SOURCE: Associated Press


http://www.philly.com/philly/news/local/20091110_Judge_tells_of_perverted_justice_in_Luzerne_juvenile_cases.html

Posted on Tue, Nov. 10, 2009


Judge tells of perverted justice in Luzerne juvenile casesBy William Ecenbarger

For The Inquirer

WILKES-BARRE - The judge who studied Luzerne County's "cash-for-kids" scheme said yesterday that children's constitutional rights had been denied and justice perverted "in ways that I would never have dreamed possible."
Judge Arthur E. Grim of Berks County, who reviewed transcripts of about 100 cases of juveniles caught up in the scheme, said the scandal grew out of "unfettered power, greed, opportunity, and intimidation."

Lawyers, court employees, and school officials knew of the scheme, but winked at it for convenience or self-preservation, Grim testified.

He described his findings to the Interbranch Commission on Juvenile Justice, an 11-member panel named by Gov. Rendell, legislative leaders, and the state Supreme Court to look into the scandal.

The commission opened two days of hearings here yesterday in its inquiry into systemic failures that permitted what federal prosecutors say was a $2.6 million kickback conspiracy involving former Luzerne County Court Judges Mark A. Ciavarella Jr. and Michael T. Conahan.

Grim said "an almost routine disregard for the rights of juvenile offenders" was known to lawyers, court staff, and school authorities, yet went on for six years or more.

He said many school officials supported Ciavarella's "zero-tolerance" policies toward teenagers no matter how minor the offense.

"When a misbehaving kid was brought to school authorities, they immediately picked up the phone and called the police," Grim testified. "They did this because they knew that if they did, that child would go before Judge Ciavarella and would be out of their hair as a problem."

He said many court officials failed to speak out because they owed their jobs to either Conahan or Ciavarella. Under orders from Ciavarella, Grim said, officers of the Juvenile Probation Department stationed themselves outside the courtroom and persuaded parents to give up their children's rights by signing waiver-of-counsel forms that were improper and legally defective.

Grim noted that in 2001, the state Superior Court reversed Ciavarella's sentencing of a 13-year-old because the judge had failed to inform the defendant of his right to a lawyer.

"Judge Ciavarella vowed publicly that this would never again happen in his courtroom. This was widely known by the general public, and especially by the members of the bar. Yet Ciaverella subsequently repeated this behavior over and over again. To my knowledge, not a single member of the Luzerne County bar ever spoke out."

He speculated that local lawyers were silent because Ciavarella was the president judge of Luzerne County Court and they feared retribution in other cases that came before him.

Grim noted that many parents who sought out lawyers to defend their children were told not to bother, because it would "only make matters worse" with Ciavarella.

"It was common knowledge that something was rotten in Denmark," Grim said.

The state Supreme Court appointed Grim, a senior judge, to review juvenile cases Ciavarella handled. Following his study, Grim recommended that about 6,500 convictions meted out by Ciavarella between 2003 and 2008 be overturned. In an unprecedented step, the high court adopted this recommendation on Oct. 29.

Grim said yesterday he decided to recommend throwing out nearly all the cases because so much money was involved in the kickbacks that "it was impossible for Ciavarella to be impartial."

Federal prosecutors say Ciavarella and Conahan collected $2.6 million from the owner of two privately run youth detention centers in exchange for the judges' sending teen defendants there.

Ciavarella and Conahan had agreed to plead guilty, but a federal judge this summer rejected their agreements with prosecutors. They withdrew their pleas and have been indicted again on racketeering charges.

Grim recommended that serious consideration should be given to opening Juvenile Court proceedings to the public, and to creating a system of circuit-riding judges and public defenders with special skills in dealing with juveniles. State law closes criminal court proceedings for people under 18.

Superior Court Judge John M. Cleland, chairman of the commission, emphasized in opening remarks that one of the panel's primary goals was to discover "what it would have taken to encourage people to act" and prevent the injustices.

"How do we create a system in which those who see corruption call the police? How do we create a system in which prosecutors who see a judge flagrantly disregard the law make a report to the [state] Judicial Conduct Board? How can we develop a system in which we select and educate our Juvenile Court judges so that glib sloganeering - and using phrases like 'zero tolerance' - is not mistaken for thoughtful judicial reflection?"

The commission may begin getting answers when hearings resume today, with testimony scheduled from representatives of the District Attorney's Office, Public Defender's Office, and Juvenile Probation Department.

Cleland also issued this plea to the people of Luzerne County:

"We know the people in this community did not consciously choose to stand on the side of injustice at the expense of children. But what was it that made it so hard to do the right thing? Were people afraid? Were they intimidated? By whom? What protections would they have wanted? Where would they have wanted to take the information they had?"

The hearing was in a large meeting room at a hotel outside the city. About 50 spectators, including local officials and representatives of advocacy groups, attended the day session. The crowd size doubled for the evening hearing.

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/homepage/20091116_In_Pa__coal_region__a_mother_lode_of_corruption.html

In Pa. coal region, a mother lode of corruption
First came "cash for kids." Now, six school board members are charged with accepting bribes from would-be teachers.
By William Ecenbarger

For The Inquirer

WILKES-BARRE - Early in the spring, the FBI made an extraordinary appeal that was carried by newspapers and broadcast media throughout northeastern Pennsylvania:

"If you are a teacher, prospective teacher, employee, or prospective employee of any kind who has been required to provide money, or anything else of value, to any individual in connection with being hired at any public school in northeastern Pennsylvania . . . you are requested to immediately contact either Special Agent Richard Southerton or Special Agent Joseph Noone in the FBI's Scranton office at telephone number 570-344-2404."

Almost immediately, the telephones were ringing. To date, six school board members have been indicted on charges they accepted bribes in exchange for hiring teachers in their districts. The FBI won't comment, but no one doubts there will be more charges.

Based on indictments and subsequent guilty pleas, the going rate for a teaching job is $5,000 in the Wilkes-Barre Area School District and the Hanover Area School District.

"The harsh truth is that it costs at least a couple of thousand dollars to get a job in a school district around here," says Thomas Baldino, who has taught political science at Wilkes University for 20 years. "You either pay it or you go well outside the area to teach. I have had really bright students who can't get teaching jobs here because they can't afford to pay for them."

Most of the attention in the federal probe into official wrongdoing in northeastern Pennsylvania has justifiably focused on the $2.8 million kickback scheme in which two Luzerne County judges allegedly sentenced juveniles to detention centers without legal representation. However, indictments have been dropping like cinder blocks outside the courthouse as well.

Indeed, as of the close of business Friday, U.S. Attorney Dennis C. Pfannenschmidt said 19 Luzerne County officials had been charged with criminal conduct in an ongoing investigation that goes well beyond the courtrooms of Michael T. Conahan and Mark A. Ciavarella Jr., the former judges who have been indicted in a "cash-for-kids" conspiracy.

The miscreants have included Charles Costanzo, who was convicted of making off with about $650,000 as county workers' compensation administrator, and William Brace, who last week pleaded guilty to accepting a $1,500 tailor-made, monogrammed suit in exchange for facilitating the award of a contract while he was deputy county clerk.

It's all merely the latest chapter in a legacy of official wrongdoing that stretches back more than a half-century and is punctuated by coal barons and mobsters - a "culture of corruption" that has snared judges and congressmen, legislators and councilmen.

Philadelphians upset with corruption in their city may find a mild tranquilizer in Pennsylvania's anthracite coal region, which includes Wilkes-Barre, Scranton, and Hazleton, where the FBI and the Justice Department have been intermittently probing public officials and racketeers for more than a half-century.

Baldino says he was born and raised in South Philadelphia and is "no stranger to crooked politicians." But, he adds, "the difference is that in Philly we have at least had episodes of reform, like Clark and Dilworth in the '50s. Here, there's never been a reform movement. What we're seeing here today is the way it's always been."

"The level of corruption is unbelievable. It's epidemic," says Robert Wolensky, a Luzerne County native who teaches sociology at the University of Wisconsin but returns regularly as an adjunct professor at King's College in Wilkes-Barre. "It wasn't until I moved to Wisconsin that I realized that corruption wasn't a normal part of government."

Baldino and Wolensky agree that the common denominator in the historic corruption has been jobs. "The Depression started here early, when the coal companies started laying off the miners in the 1920s," Wolensky said. "People became desperate for jobs, and the only jobs were with the local governments."

Baldino said at first it merely involved local politicians handing out jobs to their relatives and friends. "But before long, patronage moved into pocket-lining."

A key factor is the unusually large number of local governments. Luzerne County has four cities, 36 boroughs, and 36 townships; Lackawanna County has two cities, 17 boroughs, and 21 townships. "This is an outgrowth of the fact that every coal company had to have its own town so it could control laws and taxes," Wolensky said. "These towns survive today, and each is a little fiefdom."

"Today," he added, "paying to get a job is viewed as the proper thing to do - a way of saying thank you. Many public jobs are expected to be given only after a bribe. If you don't put the thousand dollars in the envelope, someone else will because they are as desperate as you."

Baldino said the citizens of northeastern Pennsylvania were "very forgiving" of government miscreants. He cited the case of Daniel J. Flood, the flamboyant congressman from Wilkes-Barre who was elected to a 16th term in 1978 while under federal indictment for bribery and perjury. He resigned two years later and died in 1994. The Wilkes-Barre Area School District, one of the districts where teachers' jobs were sold, includes the Daniel J. Flood Elementary School.

Joseph Vadella was forced to resign as Carbondale mayor in 1997 after being sentenced to four years in federal prison in a ballot-tampering scheme. Two years later, he was elected mayor again - even though his name wasn't on the ballot and had to be written in.

In Moosic Borough, Mayor John Segilia and Councilman Joseph Mercatili were forced to resign in 1992 after pleading no contest to fixing parking tickets and manipulating DUI cases. Both were elected to the same offices two weeks ago.

On Oct. 15, Allen Bellas was charged with taking a $2,000 bribe as executive director of the Luzerne County Redevelopment Authority. He pleaded guilty, but it was too late to get his name off the Nov. 3 ballot as a candidate for reelection to the Wyoming Valley West School Board. Despite his admission, Bellas was elected to another term on the school board. He is expected to resign.

There was one sign in the Nov. 3 election that voters' forgiveness was running thin. Judge Peter Paul Olszewski Jr. was soundly defeated in his bid for retention. Such retentions are usually routine, but a photograph was published in September in a Wilkes-Barre newspaper showing the jurist with a convicted drug dealer at a Florida condominium owned by Conahan and Ciavarella. The photo was taken in 2005, before the judges' alleged misconduct became public.

Baldino and Wolensky agreed that the "cash-for-kids" scandal had appalled the community much more than other official transgressions. Ciavarella and Conahan are under indictment on 48 federal racketeering and related charges, accused of receiving $2.8 million from the developers of two juvenile detention facilities. In February, they agreed to plead guilty in a deal with prosecutors that called for 87-month prison sentences, but a federal judge rejected the accord last month, saying the two jurists had not fully accepted responsibility for the crimes. They switched their pleas to not guilty.

Wolensky said organized crime was "part of the social fabric" of northeastern Pennsylvania, which is home to one of the nation's old mob families - the Bufalinos. The current leader has been identified by state and federal authorities as William "Big Billy" D'Elia, who is serving a nine-year term for federal money-laundering and witness-tampering convictions.

There has been testimony in an unrelated state Supreme Court case that D'Elia met regularly with Conahan for breakfast at a local restaurant to discuss pending cases.

Late Friday, Gene Stilp, a Wilkes-Barre native who has been active in opposing corruption at the state level, placed "Crime Watch" posters in the Luzerne County Courthouse to give courthouse employees a way of reporting misdeeds. The posters, which depict the courthouse with a big eye, urge respondents to send their information to a box at the Wilkes-Barre post office.

"If anyone thinks that the end of corruption within the Luzerne County Courthouse is in sight, or that all past abuses have been discovered, they are sadly mistaken," Stilp said.
User avatar
beeline
 
Posts: 2024
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 4:10 pm
Location: Killadelphia, PA
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby chiggerbit » Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:19 pm

YIKES! School board members, too??? Thanks for keeping us updated.
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby chiggerbit » Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:38 pm

I mean, just think about it--it's not just the school board members. But here's a school district that's peppered with teachers who were willing to break the law to get a job.
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 142 guests