UFO event in Norway

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Postby brainpanhandler » Thu Dec 10, 2009 9:13 am

searcher,

Oh, I don't know... I thought part of what we do here is challenge each other's ideas. Maybe I'm a snob and I don't like the board cluttered up with nonsense. If I wanted that I could go sign up for icke's forum. And I'm kind of agin incitements to non-thought.
User avatar
brainpanhandler
 
Posts: 5114
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 9:38 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby 8bitagent » Thu Dec 10, 2009 9:32 am

brainpanhandler wrote:
You do realize this is hopelessly convoluted gibberish? Don't you? I mean I'm used to interpreting your nonsense because unfortunately we like many of the same topics here, but not even I can really figure out wtf you're asserting here. I started picking apart the grammar of your first paragraph and realized I would spend a lot of time pointing out how flawed your writing is for no good fucking reason at all and abandoned the project. I don't really care about pedantic little details but when your writing is so bad that it actually gets in the way of you making any sense at all it starts to get ridiculous. Even if I could fix your writing and rearrange things so that you at least were not contradicting yourself I'd be left with nonsense. Is English your first language? If it's not I'll leave you alone. Do you have a learning disability? If so I apologize.



These are raw, free form ideas not necessarily confined by tersely fine tooth proofing. Man, you would really be pulling your hair out reading
some of Vonnegut's side work, or any number of works that are not always written in a concisely discernible fashion. Why, I bet we'd all cringe going over the grammar of the hacked CRU climate emails.

My notes were just that, scribbles written in the margins. I was addressing the notion that one can dismiss every single UFO/paranormal/Fortean/high weirdness event as simply "government psyops" or "hallucination" doesn't seem to match with common sense. I apologize if some of my scribblings seem nauseatingly poor in form. Obviously, we can't all write as eloquently as the next person:)
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12244
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Searcher08 » Thu Dec 10, 2009 9:37 am

brainpanhandler wrote:searcher,

Oh, I don't know... I thought part of what we do here is challenge each other's ideas. Maybe I'm a snob and I don't like the board cluttered up with nonsense. If I wanted that I could go sign up for icke's forum. And I'm kind of agin incitements to non-thought.


It's weird bph - I always look forward to reading your stuff except around 8bit :) You write like JackR, very 'legally' with a clear 'case' presented. 8bit writes much more randomly but there is a clear pattern presented, not nothing as you think.

My own experience was having to adapt to c2w's style, which I find hard but always make the effort.

I found what he said pretty clear to me, perhaps because it mirrors my own preferred thinking style, much more a map-making, mind mapping approach.

Or as we used to say about my Maths Professor
One persons 'Obviously...' is another persons 'Huh??!!'
User avatar
Searcher08
 
Posts: 5887
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:21 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Cosmic Cowbell » Thu Dec 10, 2009 9:42 am

justdrew wrote: Very odd. Would like to see a reconstruction diagram of how that would work.


http://gizmodo.com/5422792/this-is-how- ... l-happened
"There are no whole truths: all truths are half-truths. It is trying to treat them as whole truths that plays the devil." ~ A.N. Whitehead
User avatar
Cosmic Cowbell
 
Posts: 1774
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 5:20 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby brainpanhandler » Thu Dec 10, 2009 9:51 am

Alright, alright, sigh. 8bit, if you have any clearly redeeming virtue it's that you never seem to get offended and I've never seen you insult anyone. Searcher, I'll take that as a compliment as jack is pretty clearly a better writer than I.

But this isn't the thread to have this conversation (sorry to those that could give a shit about this), because I'm still not really certain what the frick this is:


Image

Image

I mean I just don't get the scale in these images, especially the second one where there is a foreground for reference. Am I mistaken in believing the exhaust fan from an out of control, spinning rocket would have to be enormous to appear like this?
User avatar
brainpanhandler
 
Posts: 5114
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 9:38 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby elfismiles » Thu Dec 10, 2009 9:55 am

Cosmic Cowbell wrote:
justdrew wrote: Very odd. Would like to see a reconstruction diagram of how that would work.


http://gizmodo.com/5422792/this-is-how- ... l-happened


Yep. As I provided links earlier ... Missile Test. Just like the one from Tomsk in 2006.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 2961312148

http://www.google.com/search?q=tomsk+ru ... ssile+test

And 8bit and others ...

- Roswell was NOT the "true UFO pheonomenon" it was most likely the result of AmeriKa's continued Unit-731 experiments (see Nick Redfern's BODYSNATCHERS IN THE DESERT).

- The UFO Battle of Los Angeles was the inspiration for Spielberg's wonderful flop 1941.

... and on and on and on ...

The scale of this thing though ... if it is in low earth orbit it makes a lot of sense.
Last edited by elfismiles on Thu Dec 10, 2009 9:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
elfismiles
 
Posts: 8512
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (4)

Postby brainpanhandler » Thu Dec 10, 2009 9:56 am

and I'm gonna steal this one before Barracuda gets to it:

...I mean it's not rocket science, oh wait...
User avatar
brainpanhandler
 
Posts: 5114
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 9:38 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Blue » Thu Dec 10, 2009 10:00 am

I have a hard time believing a rocket would spiral so symmetrically. And the colors are so precise - don't see any flame out.

What's with the black hole sun thingy?


Image[/img]
User avatar
Blue
 
Posts: 725
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 1:39 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby brainpanhandler » Thu Dec 10, 2009 10:15 am

Cosmic Cowbell wrote:
justdrew wrote: Very odd. Would like to see a reconstruction diagram of how that would work.


http://gizmodo.com/5422792/this-is-how- ... l-happened


I'm sold. That's pretty conclusive.
User avatar
brainpanhandler
 
Posts: 5114
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 9:38 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Blue » Thu Dec 10, 2009 10:23 am

Cosmic Cowbell wrote:
justdrew wrote: Very odd. Would like to see a reconstruction diagram of how that would work.


http://gizmodo.com/5422792/this-is-how- ... l-happened


Okay that looks and sounds like a good explanation. But it's a computer simulation.

Never seen footage of something spiraling like that in the sky creating absolutely symmetrical rings.
User avatar
Blue
 
Posts: 725
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 1:39 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby beeline » Thu Dec 10, 2009 10:29 am

I am in the 'misfired rocket' camp, as I have seen something like this before, in southern Quebec in July, 1986. What we saw turned out to be a misfired Japanese rocket that blew up over North America. It sort of looked like this:

Image

Except that picture would represent one arm of the four or five arms on the spiral.

Freaked us out, and the only reason I ever knew what it was was because I happened across an article in Omni a few months later.
User avatar
beeline
 
Posts: 2024
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 4:10 pm
Location: Killadelphia, PA
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Searcher08 » Thu Dec 10, 2009 12:43 pm

Russians admit it was part of a plan to open wormhole to allow Anti-Christ to march across the 4th Dimension

http://www.barentsobserver.com/?id=4663955&language=en
User avatar
Searcher08
 
Posts: 5887
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:21 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby nathan28 » Thu Dec 10, 2009 1:55 pm

brainpanhandler wrote:
Cosmic Cowbell wrote:
justdrew wrote: Very odd. Would like to see a reconstruction diagram of how that would work.


http://gizmodo.com/5422792/this-is-how- ... l-happened


I'm sold. That's pretty conclusive.


Have you been watching a lot of controlled demolition youtube posts recently? That's not data. That's a cartoon, 100% free of data. WTF is that, the mythbusters approach to journalism?
„MAN MUSS BEFUERCHTEN, DASS DAS GANZE IN GOTTES HAND IST"

THE JEERLEADER
User avatar
nathan28
 
Posts: 2957
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 6:48 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby barracuda » Thu Dec 10, 2009 2:25 pm

This looks pretty much like just what I'd expect a high powered Catherine Wheel to look like.

Image
The most dangerous traps are the ones you set for yourself. - Phillip Marlowe
User avatar
barracuda
 
Posts: 12890
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Searcher08 » Thu Dec 10, 2009 2:28 pm

brainpanhandler wrote:and I'm gonna steal this one before Barracuda gets to it:

...I mean it's not rocket science, oh wait...


Are you after an ego booster :happyclap:
User avatar
Searcher08
 
Posts: 5887
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:21 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to High Weirdness

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests