Breaking: Small Plane Crashes into Austin Building
| Author |
Message |
|
elfismiles
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm Posts: 2747 Location: South Austin, Texas
|
 Re: Breaking: Small Plane Crashes into Austin Building
DBC, I think the timeline may go something like this...
Distraught man sees news reports of small plane crash and begins writing his last words as another small plane crash news report cycle begins. (New Jersey crash / Palo Alto crash)
Maybe he was just contemplating the possibility when he started but then has a fight with his wife and she leaves taking the kid. Depression and anxieties deepen.
News cycles still going strong reporting small plane crashes.
Thursday morning he sets fire to the home, heads to the airport.
Folks at airport see and recognize him and probably note that he leaves without filing a flight-plan which is totally legal... for now.
Within minutes of the fire starting the fire department arrives and ascertains the names of those who live there. They find out he is a pilot and literally live on air the local news people start to put two and two together (see my previous post about that).
Is it possible there is much more to all of this? Hell yeah! How likely is this more than just one man going over the edge? Possible though I'm not yet convinced its probable.
EDIT: add to this the recent incident with Amy Bishop and it all fits the Copycat Effect to a Tee.
_________________ "I'm all verklempt. Talk amongst yourselves. I'll give you a topic ... Cyberbiological Studies of the Imaginal Component in the UFO Contact Experience, discuss." - Linda Richman, Host of Coffee Talk
Last edited by elfismiles on Fri Feb 19, 2010 3:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
| Fri Feb 19, 2010 3:42 pm |
|
 |
|
Uncle $cam
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 5:11 pm Posts: 1100
|
 Re: Breaking: Small Plane Crashes into Austin Building
I don't know, I'm mountain time, and it seems to me he had been identified by just before noon here, which is what? An hours difference from Austin?
_________________ Suffering raises up those souls that are truly great; it is only small souls that are made mean-spirited by it. - Alexandra David-Neel
|
| Fri Feb 19, 2010 3:43 pm |
|
 |
|
JackRiddler
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm Posts: 3927
|
 Re: Breaking: Small Plane Crashes into Austin Building
What does this have to do with CA? Am I missing something? He had moved from CA to TX years ago. The plane was hangared and took off from an Austin airport.
|
| Fri Feb 19, 2010 3:44 pm |
|
 |
|
elfismiles
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm Posts: 2747 Location: South Austin, Texas
|
 Re: Breaking: Small Plane Crashes into Austin Building
Thanks for that one Jack. I'd forgotten that one.
_________________ "I'm all verklempt. Talk amongst yourselves. I'll give you a topic ... Cyberbiological Studies of the Imaginal Component in the UFO Contact Experience, discuss." - Linda Richman, Host of Coffee Talk
|
| Fri Feb 19, 2010 3:45 pm |
|
 |
|
elfismiles
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm Posts: 2747 Location: South Austin, Texas
|
 Re: Breaking: Small Plane Crashes into Austin Building
I think DB just thinks its extremely weird that AJStack hadn't updated his aircraft info with the FAA. My dad is a pilot so I can inquire as to whether that is particularly anomalous or not.
_________________ "I'm all verklempt. Talk amongst yourselves. I'll give you a topic ... Cyberbiological Studies of the Imaginal Component in the UFO Contact Experience, discuss." - Linda Richman, Host of Coffee Talk
|
| Fri Feb 19, 2010 3:46 pm |
|
 |
|
elfismiles
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm Posts: 2747 Location: South Austin, Texas
|
 Re: Breaking: Small Plane Crashes into Austin Building
Not sure exactly when this aired (is the time stamp on the video visible?) or if it was the first public connecting of the two incidents... EDIT: looks like this aired right about 11:30am CST.
_________________ "I'm all verklempt. Talk amongst yourselves. I'll give you a topic ... Cyberbiological Studies of the Imaginal Component in the UFO Contact Experience, discuss." - Linda Richman, Host of Coffee Talk
Last edited by elfismiles on Fri Feb 19, 2010 3:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
| Fri Feb 19, 2010 3:48 pm |
|
 |
|
elfismiles
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm Posts: 2747 Location: South Austin, Texas
|
 Re: Breaking: Small Plane Crashes into Austin Building
 |  |  |  | Quote: The FBI Didn't Take Down Austin Plane Crash Pilot Joe Stack's Online Manifesto Lawrence Delevingne | Feb. 18, 2010, 5:44 PM Update 2: T35 has changed its note on the site to no longer make reference to an FBI request. Update 1: Melen of T35 stands by his claim. "The FBI did call me and ask that I take down the site," he tells us. "I am not sure if you'd call it a request, recommendation, or suggestion, but that's what happened." -- Who took down Joe Stack's online manifesto? The pilot who flew his small plane into an IRS office in Austin, Texas this morning wrote a suicide note on his former business domain http://embeddedart.com (pictured here). But shortly after the site attracted national attention, a note from the hosting company, T35 Hosting, went up in place of the text at 2:30 pm: This website has been taken offline due to the sensitive nature of the events that transpired in Texas this morning and in compliance with a request from the FBI. To see an archived version of the original letter, please go here: http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/ye ... tack1.html. Problem is, the FBI doesn't make such requests. FBI spokesman Special Agent Eric Vasys in San Antonio tells us "the FBI does not request that sites remove language such as being reported to be authored by Mr. Stack. That's not our area to do that." On the contrary, Vasys adds: "In similar investigations, requests are made that electronic records be maintained for investigative purposes and not be destroyed or erased." That contradicts what Alex Melen, who is listed as the president and founder of T35, noted in a forum post today that "The fbi requests were made over the phone." It's not clear if the call was a hoax or if Melen is finding an excuse to shut down an overloaded server. As he posted, the traffic was crippling: Joe went over his bandwidth limits in just a few minutes today actually. I personally credited his account with an extra $500 of bandwidth to keep his site up. Even though it was just a text page, it was still close to 100kb in size, and when multiplied by over 10,000,000 hits (in the last 2 hours), that's still enough to bring a server down and use hundreds of GB of bandwidth. And this: I'm not going to really comment on the event specifically.. but just wanted to say that Joe was a customer with us for a long time (over 6 years) and had never had any issues. Always paid his bills on time, always a good customer. I'm still really shocked by everything that happened. Melen did not immediately respond to a request for comment. http://www.businessinsider.com/who-took ... sto-2010-2 |  |  |  |  |
_________________ "I'm all verklempt. Talk amongst yourselves. I'll give you a topic ... Cyberbiological Studies of the Imaginal Component in the UFO Contact Experience, discuss." - Linda Richman, Host of Coffee Talk
|
| Fri Feb 19, 2010 3:53 pm |
|
 |
|
dbcooper41
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 6:55 pm Posts: 260 Location: North Carolina
|
 Re: Breaking: Small Plane Crashes into Austin Building
the plane found in the wreckage was registered to andrew stack in lincoln, ca. i'm wondering about how they 1)identified the plane in the burning wreckage, 2) after finding it was registered to stack in ca, why didn't they report it as "the plane is registered to ....". instead it was "the pilot has been identified". doesn't that seem a little unusual? the explanations offered are perfectly reasonable, and probably what happened. but..... there are widely varying accounts of the house fire, with witness names. why? also, from witness accounts and the ferocity of the fire, it sounds like his house may have been wired with explosives. the timeline between the initial fire reports and his take off is very tight, possible but tight. hardly leaves time to top off his tank as was reported. of course he could have used timers(he was a controls guy) and been out of the house by 8:00am with plenty of time. also, it seems mighty quickly that they proclaimed he was the pilot, who had set fire to his house before taking off. mighty fast arson investigation! also, witness accounts at the crash site sure seem to suggest an explosion. i'm not an expert on small planes flying into buildings but, that was a helluva boom. and the pics of the building look like many windows might have been boarded up. was construction going on in the area hit by any chance? it would help explain the low casualty count. obviously i question everything, to an annoying degree. sorry, i can't help myself sometimes. 
|
| Fri Feb 19, 2010 4:11 pm |
|
 |
|
dbcooper41
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 6:55 pm Posts: 260 Location: North Carolina
|
 Re: Breaking: Small Plane Crashes into Austin Building
i think an even better question was asked yesterday, "how did we become aware of his website so quickly? it was mighty obscure." also, does anyone know about this "businessinsider.com? they seem to have broken alot of the tidbits on this story.
|
| Fri Feb 19, 2010 4:16 pm |
|
 |
|
elfismiles
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm Posts: 2747 Location: South Austin, Texas
|
 Re: Breaking: Small Plane Crashes into Austin Building
I think I know this guy ... was just alerted to a bandmate's name in the media reports whom I know. Inquiring.
_________________ "I'm all verklempt. Talk amongst yourselves. I'll give you a topic ... Cyberbiological Studies of the Imaginal Component in the UFO Contact Experience, discuss." - Linda Richman, Host of Coffee Talk
|
| Fri Feb 19, 2010 4:20 pm |
|
 |
|
Howling Rainbows
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:46 pm Posts: 126 Location: shadows
|
 Re: Breaking: Small Plane Crashes into Austin Building
dbcooper41: how exactly did they identify him so fast? looks like the tail numbers would be a little hard to read under the circumstances. plus, it was registered in california, so why associate it with a house fire in austin so quickly? he didn't file a flight plan and he didn't make any contact with the FAA. so how did they associate him with the event so quickly? the early reports even had the wrong model plane and had his burning house in waco.(willful misinfo?)
and does it seem strange that after the plane was identified as belonging to him, he was proclaimed the pilot instead of the "registered owner"?
Possibly by triangulating a GPS signal that his cell phone was putting out? Maybe they cross referenced cell phone GPS records and back tracked his phone locations to the plane and his house? I could see a scenario in my head where that might be possible using computers to crunch the data. Maybe the feds can differentiate between phones flying and driving because phones flying are not following highways?
|
| Fri Feb 19, 2010 4:37 pm |
|
 |
|
dbcooper41
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 6:55 pm Posts: 260 Location: North Carolina
|
 Re: Breaking: Small Plane Crashes into Austin Building
http://www.austin360.com/blogs/content/ ... ries/fire/so " Elbert Hutchins" implies the wife and child were elsewhere when the fire started with a "loud noise". they were being taken care of by the red cross and the FBI. and they were "remarkably calm, clearly distraught.” not sure how you can tell someone is " cleary distraught" when they are "remarkably calm". sounds like an explosion and an empty house. sounds like an explosion and a not-so-empty house. and who is he refering to here? it couldn't have been stack cuz he had a 9:40 flight to catch and he was 21 miles, 26 minutes from the airport. any pilots got an estimation for the minimum time needed to get a plane out of the hangar, get the plane topped off, cranked and in the air? http://www.mapquest.com/maps?1c=Austin& ... S:M:/bl:/e3 named witnesses; Joseph Strazza, Dane Vick, Elbert Hutchins and 3 different stories.
|
| Fri Feb 19, 2010 4:53 pm |
|
 |
|
dbcooper41
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 6:55 pm Posts: 260 Location: North Carolina
|
 Re: Breaking: Small Plane Crashes into Austin Building
wouldn't they need to know which cellphone to triangulate on? i'd assume his was no longer working after slamming into the building. if it was still working i see a product endorsement in the near future  ( btw, he did work on "hardened displays for the military) once they found out who owned the plane they would be looking for a cellphone owner who lives in california. hard to imagine they could track back to austin that fast. and with the highway nearby there must be hundreds of cellphones passing by. which to track?
|
| Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:03 pm |
|
 |
|
Nordic
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am Posts: 4507
|
 Re: Breaking: Small Plane Crashes into Austin Building
Well, take another look at what you just wrote. I have engineers in my family, too, tons of them, including my father. And yes, they are frustratingly methodical to say the least. The guy's M.O. fits perfectly with being a methodical engineer. Spend two days writing the note. Researching exactly where you want the plane to hit. Probably calculated how much fuel would make so much "boom". There's no "fit of rage" here like you describe. Instead a breaking point was reached, transcended, and a decision was made, and once beyond that psychological rubicon, he just carried out the plane like he'd carry out any other plan. Methodically. I'm not ruling anything out, I never do, but I don't see anything odd about this guy's actions versus his background and character. A lot of people are very close to the breaking point in this country. A lot of them. I'm surprised, actually, that more of this hasn't happened. Which, if it was a false flag, could have been the purpose of it, simply to have people who are close to snapping go "oh yeah, that's what it would look like if I did ________. Not so great". Then again, this thing could be a spark for a LOT of people. We may see a lot of copycat stuff in the next couple of weeks or so.
_________________ "The great nations have always acted like gangsters, and the small nations like prostitutes." -- Stanley Kubrick
|
| Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:07 pm |
|
 |
|
Nordic
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am Posts: 4507
|
 Re: Breaking: Small Plane Crashes into Austin Building
 |  |  |  | dbcooper41 wrote: http://www.austin360.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/austin/blotter/entries/fire/ so " Elbert Hutchins" implies the wife and child were elsewhere when the fire started with a "loud noise". they were being taken care of by the red cross and the FBI. and they were "remarkably calm, clearly distraught.” not sure how you can tell someone is " cleary distraught" when they are "remarkably calm". sounds like an explosion and an empty house. sounds like an explosion and a not-so-empty house. and who is he refering to here? it couldn't have been stack cuz he had a 9:40 flight to catch and he was 21 miles, 26 minutes from the airport. any pilots got an estimation for the minimum time needed to get a plane out of the hangar, get the plane topped off, cranked and in the air? http://www.mapquest.com/maps?1c=Austin& ... S:M:/bl:/e3 named witnesses; Joseph Strazza, Dane Vick, Elbert Hutchins and 3 different stories. |  |  |  |  |
I think all of this can easily be attributed to rushed and shoddy journalism. Eyewitnesses aren't always the best, as everyone should know. I mean, a man driving down a street sees a housefire, then sees a man running with a little girl in his arms and assumes they're coming from the burning house ...... They quite easily were running from an adjacent house, or just about anywhere. I'm not ruling anything out, it's just that "journalism" in moments like these doesn't have a real good track record for being accurate. And this guy was by all accounts a very intelligent and methodical guy, and if he wanted to make a device that burned down his house after he left, well, it very likely would have had an explosive aspect to it. I mean, just a leaking propane tank in your living room with a burner going on the stove in your kitchen for instance. You leave the house, wait about twenty minutes and kaboom.
_________________ "The great nations have always acted like gangsters, and the small nations like prostitutes." -- Stanley Kubrick
|
| Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:16 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: 82_28, Nordic and 5 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|