David Jacobs wrote:Over the past few months, the Internet has been filled with material from a woman who is on a campaign to defame me.
Oh c'mon, Dave. No matter how convincing her allegations, I doubt she could do much more to "defame" you than you've already done to yourself over the years with all of your "research."
David Jacobs wrote:Before I continue, it's important to explain how I work. I'm not a psychologist, psychiatrist, or psychotherapist.
Okay. But the better question is, "Have you bothered to see one?"
David Jacobs wrote:If the situation Alice reported was true and actual “hybrid beings” were threatening her, I felt I had to try to protect her from them. And obviously if Alice's reports were true, I had to try to protect myself as well.
So I guess the answer to my question would be, "No."
David Jacobs wrote:If abduction research can be trusted…
Even if it could, David Jacobs' charlatanry cannot possibly fall into the credible category of "research" — as his following remarks amply demonstrate.
...alien beings have telepathic abilities and know what people are thinking; therefore, protecting both Alice and myself was a major challenge.
I thought long and hard about what, if anything, I could do. I decided that one approach would be, during hypnosis, to give Alice ideas to think about that would throw "mind-readers" off my trail.
Um... So, in all this "long" and "hard" thinking (vaguely Freudian, too) you didn't figure that these "mind readers" would already be able to know that? 'Cause, you know, they'd have read your mind?!
Well, at least it would have been light reading, I guess.
David Jacobs wrote:I explained my thinking to her before I acted. Then at one point during a hypnosis session I told her that as a researcher I was interested not in abductions but in multiple personality disorder. I chose this because it is believable--the disorder has characteristics in common with the effects of abductions. I hoped that she would be able to keep this idea in her mind and convey it to her abductors, thereby relieving some of the pressure both she and I felt. At no time did I think that Alice had multiple personality disorder, and of course neither did she. She knew exactly what was happening and why.
So she "knew" that you were being an idiot, and played along with it. Fair enough. If so, that would explain why I'm really not inclined to be in her corner either on this one.
And why is David Jacobs doing hypnosis on a population of people — many of whom are likely to be quite vulnerable — anyway?!? Since he's already established that he's "not a psychologist, psychiatrist, or psychotherapist" (and we know for a fact that he doesn't even play one on TV), his credentials for doing all of this all along have been dubious at best. So now he's being recorded at least sounding like he's implanting the idea of multiple personality disorder (more appropriately "Dissociative Identity Disorder") inside the hypnotized mind of a "research" subject?!
What a schlimazel. Whatever "Alice's" intentions, this might turn out to be fair payback for Jacobs having been such a schlemiel for so, so long.
David Jacobs has no business appearing to "lead" anyone to believe anything while they're under hypnosis — for any reason. I've considered him a likely charlatan all along, and this seals the deal.