Fingers Point at Haliburton as Potential Cause of Gulf Oil

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Fingers Point at Haliburton as Potential Cause of Gulf Oil

Postby seemslikeadream » Mon May 03, 2010 9:30 pm

Fingers Point at Haliburton as Potential Cause of Gulf Oil Spill
Posted by CJensen@infoaddict.com | May 3rd, 2010 | No Comments »
FILED UNDER: All. Business.



Haliburton, the second largest oilfield services company on the planet, once headed by vice-president Dick Cheney, is rearing its head once again as a likely culprit in the ongoing Gulf of Mexico oil spill. Yes, this is the same Haliburton that broke federal trade barriers in Iraq and Libya, received countless no-bid contracts, paid a Nigerian official $2.4-million in bribes to receive favorable tax treatment, was awarded a $345-million contract to build internment camps on American soil, intentionally overcharged the military (and you) for fuel, and more recently, has been implicated in the oil spill in the Timor Sea in 2009 for improper cementing.

Let me repeat that: Improper cementing.

Haliburton supplied the concrete for the Gulf of Mexico oil rig.

From the L.A. Times:

After an exploration well is drilled, cement slurry is pumped through a steel pipe or casing and out through a check valve at the bottom of the casing. It then travels up the outside of the pipe, sheathing the part of the pipe surrounded by the oil and gas zone. When the cement hardens, it is supposed to prevent oil or gas from leaking into adjacent zones along the pipe.

As the cement sets, the check valve at the end of the casing prevents any material from flowing back up the pipe. The zone is thus isolated until the company is ready to start production.

The process is tricky. A 2007 study by the U.S. Minerals Management Service found that cementing was the single most-important factor in 18 of 39 well blowouts in the Gulf of Mexico over a 14-year period.


Is Halliburton Responsible for the Oil Spill?

Cheney: categorically denies all involvement.

The quick answer: quite probably. The Wall Street Journal and The Huffington Post are both reporting that initial investigations on the explosion are focusing on flaws in the “cementing” process on the oil rig, by which gaps in the pipeline are filled with concrete. The Halliburton Corp. was engaged in this task, and completed it shortly before the oil rig exploded, sending 5,000 barrels per day hurtling toward the Louisiana coastline – which, we hasten to remind you, is likely to surpass the Exxon Valdez disaster as the worst environmental catastrophe in American history.

You might be familiar with the Halliburton Corp. Dick Cheney headed the oil-services multinational right up until he became Vice President in 2000. In the Iraq War, Halliburton and its subsidiary, KBR, received massive no-bid contracts to reconstruct much of Iraq (as well as build detention facilities like Camp X-Ray). They received this contract despite having previously opened an office in Tehran, potentially violating Federal “Trading with the Enemy” laws for which they were never prosecuted. Indeed, Halliburton/KBR acquired such extensive contracts in Iraq based upon estimates that their $2.5 billion contract would pay for itself. However the oil fields they worked on are barely usable. In particular, the company went against its own advisers in attempting to construct a pipeline underneath the Tigris River through a fault zone. “”No driller in his right mind would have gone ahead,” said Army geologist Robert Sanders when the military finally sent people to inspect the work. Nonetheless, Halliburton/KBR massively overcharged the federal government for their work.

This is all background, folks, and there’s lots more of it – the stuff that disappears down the memory hole when we pay too much attention to Heidi Montag’s plastic surgery. It all begs the question: is Halliburton the worst company in the world? And further: is Dick Cheney still messing up this country?

Again, the quick answer: probably yes
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Fingers Point at Haliburton as Potential Cause of Gulf Oil

Postby Nordic » Mon May 03, 2010 9:46 pm

I hate Halliburton as much as anybody, but these kinds of articles really aren't helpful. Because if Halliburton merely supplied the concrete, that hardly makes them culpable.

We shouldn't jump to conclusions until we actually know something, or there's more evidence.

I mean, Rush Limbaugh said it "could have been" environmental extremists. This really isn't that different.

"It could have been".
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Fingers Point at Haliburton as Potential Cause of Gulf Oil

Postby seemslikeadream » Mon May 03, 2010 9:51 pm

Nordic wrote:I hate Halliburton as much as anybody, but these kinds of articles really aren't helpful. Because if Halliburton merely supplied the concrete, that hardly makes them culpable.

We shouldn't jump to conclusions until we actually know something, or there's more evidence.

I mean, Rush Limbaugh said it "could have been" environmental extremists. This really isn't that different.

"It could have been".


Halliburton Presentation May Explain Horizon Oil Rig Explosion and Fire
By: Scarecrow Friday April 30, 2010 1:53 pm


What More Can Halliburton Tell Us About the Horizon Oil Blowout and Its Risks?

A publicly available Halliburton PowerPoint presentation from last November might tell us a lot about what could have caused the oil blowout, fire and massive oil gushing at the Horizon rig.

Suppose you’re that division of Halliburton that has the dangerous job of "cementing" the drilling hole and the gaps between the hole and pipe. You’ve done this lots of times in shallow water wells, but you’ve learned through previous experience in deep water there’s a particularly difficult problem having to do with the presence of gas that has seeped to the ocean floor and been captured in essentially "frozen" crystallized formations.

The problem is that when you drill into these formations, and then try to inject cement into the hole/gaps to prevent leakage, the curing process for that creates heat. That heat can, if not controlled, cause the gas to escape the frozen crystals. If a lot of gas is released all at once, as could happen during the cement/curing process, it can cause a blowout where the cementing is occurring, or force gas and/or oil up the pipeline to the drilling rig on the surface. And the heat created by the process may be just enough to ignite the gas [or more likely, a spark at the rig -- see comments], causing the explosion and fire.

Did this happen at the Horizon rig? And if Halliburton already knew about this problem months (years) ago, and knew the risks it might create, why are we just now learning about this?

From Halliburton’s presentation (large pdf), page 10, last November (my bold):

Challenges

• Shallow water flow may occur during or after cement job
• Under water blow out has happened
• Gas flow may occur after a cement job in deepwater environments that contain major hydrate zones.
• Destabilization of hydrates after the cement job is confirmed by downhole cameras.
• The gas flow could slow down in hours to days if the de- stabilization is not severe.
• However, the consequences could be more severe in worse cases.

Page 13 lists the design objectives but then concedes they can’t all be met at once:

Deepwater Well Objectives
• Cement slurry should be placed in the entire annulus with no losses
• Temperature increase during slurry hydration should not destabilize hydrates
• There should be no influx of shallow water or gas into the annulus
• The cement slurry should develop strength in the shortest time after placement
Conditions in deepwater wells are not
conducive to achieving all of these
objectives simultaneously

The presentation goes on to explain various options for dealing with the risks and assess the relative merits and costs. What’s interesting is that Halliburton appears to have been working at the edge of the technology and was not certain what would happen. Most experience was in shallower waters and no one was certain what would happen in deep waters. It conducted tests, but it’s not clear how complete or realistic those tests were or how costs factored into the choice of techniques. From page 23:

Destabilization of hydrates during cementing and production in deepwater environments is a challenge to the safety and economics

I think we’re about to learn a lot more about how cement cures and interacts with gas-locked crystaline formations in deep water drilling.

Update: See, alternative explanations at The Oil Drum, Tech Talk: Revisiting Oil Well Pressures and Blow Out Preventers . . .. Reacting to a discussion of the cementing issues in the LA Times, the author says "it is hard to see from what is known, that this was a cause in this case," though not all commenters there seem convinced.

h/t to Cynthia Kouril who seems to know about how cement cures underwater — tunnels into New York — and found the presentation.

Halliburton presenation below:




Rig had history of spills, fires before big 1
FRANK JORDANS AND GARANCE BURKE • ASSOCIATED PRESS • APRIL 30, 2010
A
During its nine years at sea, the Deepwater Horizon oil rig operated by BP suffered a series of spills, fires — even a high seas collision — because of equipment failure, human error and bad weather. It also drilled the world's deepest offshore well.

But Deepwater Horizon's lasting legacy will undoubtedly be the environmental damage it caused after it exploded and sank, killing 11 crew and releasing an estimated 210,000 gallons of oil a day into the Gulf of Mexico.





What likely destroyed the rig in a ball of fire last week was a failure — or multiple failures — 5,000 feet below. That's where drilling equipment met the sea bed in a complicated construction of pipes, concrete and valves that gave way in a manner that no one has yet been able to explain.

Halliburton had worked on pipes
Oil services contractor Halliburton Inc. said in a statement today that workers had finished cementing the well's pipes 20 hours before the rig went up in flames. Halliburton is named as a defendant in most of the more than two dozen lawsuits filed by Gulf Coast people and businesses claiming the oil spill could ruin them financially. Without elaborating, one lawsuit filed by an injured technician on the rig claims that Halliburton improperly performed its job in cementing the well, "increasing the pressure at the well and contributing to the fire, explosion and resulting oil spill."

Remote-controlled blowout preventers designed to apply brute force to seal off a well should have kicked in. But they failed to activate after the explosion.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Fingers Point at Haliburton as Potential Cause of Gulf Oil

Postby Nordic » Mon May 03, 2010 10:25 pm

Well, okay, there's a lot more info there.

I certainly would not be surprised if it were largely Halliburton's fault.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Fingers Point at Haliburton as Potential Cause of Gulf Oil

Postby JackRiddler » Mon May 03, 2010 10:30 pm

Nordic wrote:I hate Halliburton as much as anybody, but these kinds of articles really aren't helpful. Because if Halliburton merely supplied the concrete, that hardly makes them culpable.

We shouldn't jump to conclusions until we actually know something, or there's more evidence.

I mean, Rush Limbaugh said it "could have been" environmental extremists. This really isn't that different.

"It could have been".


"Environmental extremists" supplied materials used in the rig? They were among BP's contractors?

That's nothing more than defamation of a fiction. Halliburton actually exists.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fingers Point at Haliburton as Potential Cause of Gulf Oil

Postby seemslikeadream » Mon May 03, 2010 11:42 pm

Rig Worker Lawsuit: Halliburton Cement Job Cause of Gulf Oil Spill
More than two dozen lawsuits filed have directly name Halliburton as a defendant including one by and injured technician on the Deepwater Horizon rig that states Halliburton’s cement job caused the massive explosions and the resulting Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill of 2010.


Rig Worker’s lawsuit claims faulty Halliburton work caused Gulf Oil Spill.
Oil services contractor Halliburton Inc. said in a statement Friday that workers had finished cementing the well’s pipes 20 hours before the rig went up in flames. Halliburton is named as a defendant in most of the more than two dozen lawsuits filed by Gulf Coast people and businesses claiming the oil spill could ruin them financially.

Without elaborating, one lawsuit filed by an injured technician on the rig claims that Halliburton improperly performed its job in cementing the well, “increasing the pressure at the well and contributing to the fire, explosion and resulting oil spill.” says the Daily Caller in an article that outlines the history of spills and fires on the Deepwater Horzion oil rig.

Drilling experts agree that blame probably lies with flaws in the “cementing” process which Halliburton was in charge of.

“The initial likely cause of gas coming to the surface had something to do with the cement,” said Robert MacKenzie, managing director of energy and natural resources at FBR Capital Markets and a former cementing engineer in the oil industry.

The problem could have been a faulty cement plug at the bottom of the well, he said. Another possibility would be that cement between the pipe and well walls didn’t harden properly and allowed gas to pass through it.

According to a lawsuit filed in federal court by Natalie Roshto, whose husband Shane, a deck floor hand, was thrown overboard by the force of the explosion and whose body has not yet been located, Halliburton is culpable for its actions prior to the incident.

The suit claims that the company “prior to the explosion, was engaged in cementing operations of the well and well cap and, upon information and belief, improperly and negligently performed these duties, which was a cause of the explosion.”

Last year, Halliburton was also implicated for its cementing work prior to a massive blowout off the coast of Australia, where a rig caught on fire and spewed hundreds of thousands of gallons into the sea for ten weeks.

With congress launching a full fledged investigation into these claims, it is likely and probable that Halliburton is at Fault.
Last edited by seemslikeadream on Mon May 03, 2010 11:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Fingers Point at Haliburton as Potential Cause of Gulf Oil

Postby nathan28 » Mon May 03, 2010 11:45 pm

JackRiddler wrote:"Environmental extremists" supplied materials used in the rig? They were among BP's contractors?

That's nothing more than defamation of a fiction. Halliburton actually exists.



neither body to kick nor soul to damn
„MAN MUSS BEFUERCHTEN, DASS DAS GANZE IN GOTTES HAND IST"

THE JEERLEADER
User avatar
nathan28
 
Posts: 2957
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 6:48 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fingers Point at Haliburton as Potential Cause of Gulf Oil

Postby seemslikeadream » Tue May 04, 2010 12:35 am

bad news on the 19th....

cement job on the 20th...

well that was timely


Halliburton Hurt By Latin America
Madalina Iacob, 04.19.10, 10:55 AM EDT
Delays in Mexican and Venezuelan projects overshadow strength in North America for the oilfield services outfit.

Weak demand in Latin America and decreased spending on oil and gas projects hurt Halliburton’s first-quarter net income which was down 45% from a year earlier.

The oilfield services provider said earnings fell to $206 million, or 23 cents per share, down from $378 million or 42 cents per share a year ago. Excluding the $31 million currency adjustment, net income was 28 cents per share, above the Street's consensus of 25 cents. Revenue fell 4% to $3.76 billion from $3.90 million a year earlier while operating margin dropped to 11.9% from 15.8%.

Halliburton ( HAL - news - people )said a delay in new projects in Mexico caused a disappointing result in its Latin America business, where revenue fell 8% and operating margins dropped to 9%. The company offered an optimistic forecast though, arguing that its business has nowhere to go but up. "Tangible indications are that, barring any major economic disruption, the industry is likely to experience a steady resurgence in international activity in the second half of the year and into 2011,” said Chairman and Chief Executive Dave Lesar.

The company's North American business was a bright spot as operating income more than doubled from the prior quarter, while revenue increased by 19%. Rig count rose by 21% in North America. Challenges remain, most importantly natural gas supply and demand fundamentals, but the company believes "a sustainable recovery will only occur with an increase in natural gas demand.”

“You have a tale of two different regions,” says Waqar Syed, senior analyst at Macquarie Research, referring to the revenue pickup in North America and the fall in margins abroad. Syed says the outlook for the U.S. looks uncertain taking into account the decline in gas prices. The United States Natural Gas Fund lost 30% since the beginning of the year and it was recently trading down 2.5% at $7.

He thinks Halliburton is better positioned in the future compared with other services companies because it has exposure to international markets and oil related projects rather than the U.S. About 55% of revenue is generated from abroad.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Fingers Point at Haliburton as Potential Cause of Gulf Oil

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Tue May 04, 2010 1:25 am

1998 CIA-Hollywood:
Oil well drillers and the US military save the planet, starring Bruce Willis-
Image
CIA runs mainstream media since WWII:
news rooms, movies/TV, publishing
...
Disney is CIA for kidz!
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fingers Point at Haliburton as Potential Cause of Gulf Oil

Postby Fixx » Tue May 04, 2010 8:09 am

Hugh Manatee Wins wrote:1998 CIA-Hollywood:
Oil well drillers and the US military save the planet, starring Bruce Willis-
Image


From what I recall this film got very poor reviews so I am not sure why you are recommending it Hugh. :roll:
Fixx
 
Posts: 190
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 7:04 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fingers Point at Haliburton as Potential Cause of Gulf Oil

Postby Cordelia » Tue May 04, 2010 10:19 am

^^It may have had poor reviews but it had plenty of viewers. In fact, my daughter mentioned it, in relation to the gulf accident, yesterday; "Remember that disaster film with Bruce Willis on the oil rig?" (The disaster in the movie wasn't on the rig.)
The greatest sin is to be unconscious. ~ Carl Jung

We may not choose the parameters of our destiny. But we give it its content. ~ Dag Hammarskjold 'Waymarks'
User avatar
Cordelia
 
Posts: 3697
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 7:07 pm
Location: USA
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fingers Point at Haliburton as Potential Cause of Gulf Oil

Postby Alfred Joe's Boy » Tue May 04, 2010 10:35 am

http://cryptogon.com/?p=15151
Oil Slickonomics
May 3rd, 2010
Via: The Big Picture:

Three scenarios lie ahead. They rank as bad, worse, and ugliest (the latter being catastrophic and unprecedented). There is no “good” here.

The Bad.

Containment chambers are put in place and they catch the outflow from the three ruptures that are currently pouring 200,000 gallons of oil into the Gulf every day. If this works, it will take until June to complete. The chambers are 30-foot-high steel configurations that must be placed on the ocean floor at a depth of one mile. This has never been done before. If early containment is successful, the damages from this accident will be in the tens of billions. The cleanup will take years. The economic impact will be in the five states that have frontal coastline on the Gulf of Mexico: Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida.

The Worse.

The containment attempts fail and oil spews for months, until a new well can successfully be drilled to a depth of 13000 feet below the 5000-foot-deep ocean floor, and then concrete and mud are injected into the existing ruptured well until it is successfully closed and sealed. Work on this approach is already commencing. Timeframe for success is at least three months. Note the new well will have to come within about 20 feet of the existing point where the original well enters the reservoir at a distance of 3.5 miles from the surface drilling rig. Damages by this time may be measured in the hundreds of billions. Cleanup will take many, many years. Tourism, fishing, all related industries may be fundamentally changed for as much as a generation. Spread to Mexico and other Gulf geography is possible.

The Ugliest.

This spew stoppage takes longer to reach a full closure; the subsequent cleanup may take a decade. The Gulf becomes a damaged sea for a generation. The oil slick leaks beyond the western Florida coast, enters the Gulfstream and reaches the eastern coast of the United States and beyond. Use your imagination for the rest of the damage. Monetary cost is now measured in the many hundreds of billions of dollars.


Am posting also comments #4 and #5 from commenter known as "Eileen" (bold emphasis mine):
4.Eileen Says:
May 4th, 2010 at 3:52 am
If you go onto the NOAA website, the map of the oil spill shows that there are Air Force Unexploded Ordance Dumping Zones nearby the now defunk oil rig.
http://response.restoration.no.....#downloads

I don’t know how you enlarge that freakin picture.

And I also don’t know if something drifted off that explosive dump that finally was exploded by all the freaking air gun sonar that oil companies have been pounding the Gulf with since its now freeedom to drill wherever you want to.
(I will not quote Sarah Palin).

But this is quite sickening to me.
A few links that brought on my illness:
http://www.acousticecology.org.....csumm.html
http://www.gomr.mms.gov/PI/PDF.....2/2186.pdf see page 14, item 5 (don’t know how to make a direct link where I want to send you)
But this sucks! Jesus, Mary, and whoever, since when can our Air Force dump unexploded ordance into the Gulf? Fluck!!!
I have no advice for anyone, but you know this makes me sick.
I’m keeping my head down this spring/summer season, and if the freakin shitstorm this oil spill will bring to this earth, I might still be growing a crop of Roma tomatoes for canning (I’m about out of canned tomatoes).
This oil spill is scaring me. Big time. Crying about it. Anyways, good luck friends. Not a one of us gets out of here alive.

5.Eileen Says:
May 4th, 2010 at 4:16 am
I reread my post and the first link did not take you where I intended. Here is another linK:
http://www.gomr.mms.gov/homepg.....l06006.pdf.
Then look-ee-see this:
http://www.saic.com/aquatic-sc.....o-mec.html
So there’s all this oil and unexploded ordance in the Gulf of Mexico.
I can’t come up with the picture, but there’s something about the two of these together that spells the cause of the oil spill in the Gulf today.
Hope Kevin can pick it up. Thanks.
Alfred Joe's Boy
 
Posts: 222
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 2:29 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fingers Point at Haliburton as Potential Cause of Gulf Oil

Postby seemslikeadream » Tue May 04, 2010 11:15 am

Alfred Joe's Boy wrote:http://cryptogon.com/?p=15151
Oil Slickonomics
May 3rd, 2010
Via: The Big Picture:

Three scenarios lie ahead. They rank as bad, worse, and ugliest (the latter being catastrophic and unprecedented). There is no “good” here.

The Bad.

Containment chambers are put in place and they catch the outflow from the three ruptures that are currently pouring 200,000 gallons of oil into the Gulf every day. If this works, it will take until June to complete. The chambers are 30-foot-high steel configurations that must be placed on the ocean floor at a depth of one mile. This has never been done before. If early containment is successful, the damages from this accident will be in the tens of billions. The cleanup will take years. The economic impact will be in the five states that have frontal coastline on the Gulf of Mexico: Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida.

The Worse.

The containment attempts fail and oil spews for months, until a new well can successfully be drilled to a depth of 13000 feet below the 5000-foot-deep ocean floor, and then concrete and mud are injected into the existing ruptured well until it is successfully closed and sealed. Work on this approach is already commencing. Timeframe for success is at least three months. Note the new well will have to come within about 20 feet of the existing point where the original well enters the reservoir at a distance of 3.5 miles from the surface drilling rig. Damages by this time may be measured in the hundreds of billions. Cleanup will take many, many years. Tourism, fishing, all related industries may be fundamentally changed for as much as a generation. Spread to Mexico and other Gulf geography is possible.

The Ugliest.

This spew stoppage takes longer to reach a full closure; the subsequent cleanup may take a decade. The Gulf becomes a damaged sea for a generation. The oil slick leaks beyond the western Florida coast, enters the Gulfstream and reaches the eastern coast of the United States and beyond. Use your imagination for the rest of the damage. Monetary cost is now measured in the many hundreds of billions of dollars.


Am posting also comments #4 and #5 from commenter known as "Eileen" (bold emphasis mine):
4.Eileen Says:
May 4th, 2010 at 3:52 am
If you go onto the NOAA website, the map of the oil spill shows that there are Air Force Unexploded Ordance Dumping Zones nearby the now defunk oil rig.
http://response.restoration.no.....#downloads

I don’t know how you enlarge that freakin picture.

And I also don’t know if something drifted off that explosive dump that finally was exploded by all the freaking air gun sonar that oil companies have been pounding the Gulf with since its now freeedom to drill wherever you want to.
(I will not quote Sarah Palin).

But this is quite sickening to me.
A few links that brought on my illness:
http://www.acousticecology.org.....csumm.html
http://www.gomr.mms.gov/PI/PDF.....2/2186.pdf see page 14, item 5 (don’t know how to make a direct link where I want to send you)
But this sucks! Jesus, Mary, and whoever, since when can our Air Force dump unexploded ordance into the Gulf? Fluck!!!
I have no advice for anyone, but you know this makes me sick.
I’m keeping my head down this spring/summer season, and if the freakin shitstorm this oil spill will bring to this earth, I might still be growing a crop of Roma tomatoes for canning (I’m about out of canned tomatoes).
This oil spill is scaring me. Big time. Crying about it. Anyways, good luck friends. Not a one of us gets out of here alive.

5.Eileen Says:
May 4th, 2010 at 4:16 am
I reread my post and the first link did not take you where I intended. Here is another linK:
http://www.gomr.mms.gov/homepg.....l06006.pdf.
Then look-ee-see this:
http://www.saic.com/aquatic-sc.....o-mec.html
So there’s all this oil and unexploded ordance in the Gulf of Mexico.
I can’t come up with the picture, but there’s something about the two of these together that spells the cause of the oil spill in the Gulf today.
Hope Kevin can pick it up. Thanks.



Excellent
thanks for that AJB

Image
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Fingers Point at Haliburton as Potential Cause of Gulf Oil

Postby seemslikeadream » Tue May 04, 2010 12:19 pm

Gulf oil well disaster could mean explosive profits for Halliburton

The oil well explosion in the Gulf of Mexico could be a well-timed and profitable accident for Halliburton, the global oil company with the famous connection to former U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney. Just eight days before the uber-Valdez accident, Houston-based Halliburton acquired Boots & Coots Services, also based in Houston, in a $240 million cash and stock deal.
Boots & Coots, which uses the graphic of a burning oil well to represent the ampersand in its name, specializes in "pressure control and well intervention services." In other words, when an oil well explodes, Boots & Coots can step in and help remedy the problem. In a release, Jerry Winchester, Boots & Coots president and CEO, says "Combining the resources of both companies creates the premier intervention company across the globe.”
While Halliburton's timing of the acquisition could be chalked up to luck, some members of Congress are asking questions. Reps. Henry A. Waxman (D-Beverly Hills) and Bart Stupak (D-Mich.), have asked Halliburton provide all documents relating to "the possibility or risk of an explosion or blowout" at the rig in the Gulf, according to a report in the LA Times.
In her recent speech delivered in Independence, Mo., Sarah Palin, mother of the "Drill Baby Drill" mantra heard at the last Republican National Convention, called the British Petroleum disaster "very tragic." She went on to say she hopes the country will be able to "trust the oil companies," according to a Politico story.
As reported by Kansas City Political Buzz Examiner Jason Adkins, BP is engaging in textbook damage control by taking responsibility for the accident and promising to make amends. Depending on how Congressional investigations proceed, however, it's possible elected officials will gauge the viability of their corporate alliances based on public outcry. If constituents aren't vocal enough, lawmakers might read a public willingness to at least pretend the iron fist still wears a velvet glove.


Oil spill threatening ‘dying’ US delta
By Harvey Morris in Grand Bayou, Louisiana
Published: May 4 2010 16:23 | Last updated: May 4 2010 16:23
If the oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico from the Deepwater Horizon rig is not stopped soon it could be the death blow to an already dying Mississippi delta, environmentalists are warning.

The slick from the BP well threatening the coastlines of four southern states has highlighted decades-old concerns about the future of the unique marshlands of the region, fuelling an emerging backlash against an expansion of offshore oil drilling elsewhere in the US.


Environmental groups, including the venerable Sierra Club, meanwhile wrote to all 100 US senators this week urging them to block plans to expand offshore drilling, arguing it was an “inherently dangerous, risky and dirty business”.

A month before the Gulf oil leak began, President Barack Obama proposed opening almost 170m acres of water along the Atlantic coast, the eastern Gulf of Mexico and the north coast of Alaska to oil and natural gas drilling.

Local environmentalists in the deep delta region south of New Orleans say the oil industry is at least partly to blame for the degradation of the wetlands that has been accelerating for the past 80 years since levees were first built to control the course of the Mississippi shipping channels.

The loss of marshland is visible well within the lifetime of delta-dwellers. Julia Sylve belongs to the handful of families of shrimpers and oyster fisherman who inhabit the tiny hamlet of Grand Bayou, accessible from the main highway only by flat-bottomed boat.

Steering her craft through the flat waterscape of marshland rich with bird life, basking alligators and leaping redfish, the 22-year-old says she has seen the ground around the three-centuries-old fishing community disappear in just a few years.

“Since we got piped water when I was four, and the telephone when I was six, the water has spread. Over there used to be Indian Hill,” she said, pointing at a line of broken trees on the horizon. “Now it’s gone.”

The Louisiana department of natural resources said in 2007 that 405,000ha would be lost by 2040 – an area a third bigger than the state of Rhode Island. Louisiana accounted for 80 percent of the entire country’s annual land loss, the department estimated.

Foster Creppel, a local environmental activist, translated the statistics: “The loss amounts to the size of a football field every half hour.”

Canals cut for oil and gas pipelines have added to the degradation of the marshland, leaving it vulnerable to the toxic shock of an oil slick that could make its slow death irreversible.

“Dead-end canals have changed the hydraulics,” said Mr Creppel, “speeding up the ebb and flow of saltwater.” As part of efforts to stem the degradation, freshwater is now pumped back artificially into the increasingly brackish marshland waters.

The US Congress passed the Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and Restoration Act in 1990 that includes provision for an annual $60m of wetland enhancement projects in Louisiana. However, environmentalists say this might be too little in the face of the potential oil disaster.

It is not just the birds and the fishing grounds that are under threat. The delta that extends 70 miles south of New Orleans helps to slow the path of incoming hurricanes. The severe impact of Hurricane Katrina on the city in 2005 was blamed in part on the loss of the delta land that previously protected it.

The White House said on Monday it was premature to rule out an expansion of offshore drilling from comprehensive energy legislation in light of the Gulf disaster.

Robert Gibbs, White House spokesman, said a final decision would depend on the findings of an investigation into the massive leak.



Is Arcadia Lost?

Oil and Wetlands

By DARWIN BOND-GRAHAM

The entire Gulf Coast wetlands ecosystem is a delicate and profound balance of tides, winds, and ocean temperatures. It's almost cosmic. Tides push and pull vast and deep columns of water through narrow passes into lakes and bays and back out to the open ocean. This is a marine cardiovascular system on a continental scale, one supporting waters that roil with life. Winds move shallow layers of salt water toward the shore and push back with undercurrents of brackish and freshwater from lakes like Pontchartrain, Borgne, and Salvador. The coastal prairies and cypress swamps breath. Water temperatures and salt concentrations from the edge of the continental shelf and as close as the shallows of Chandeleur Sound and Barataria Bay trigger complex movements of sea life, telling them when to spawn and where to feed. Larger seasonal shifts provide signals to migratory birds, ushering them to land upon horizon-to-horizon beds of grass where they feed from the bounty all around.

And humans too live in this balance. For hundreds of years Cajun, Isleno, Creole, and African American fishermen have watched the tides and licked their fingers to the winds, following the shrimp, oysters, fish, and fowl of this land-meets-ocean edge world that their ancestors deemed a paradise. "Acadiana" from which "cajun" is a modified anglicization which at its root refers to the idyllic place of Greek beauty and bounty, Arcadia.

But as Nicolas Poussin's shepherds remind us, even "et in Arcadia ego" — interpretable as "even in paradise, death exist." The seeming paradise of southern Louisiana, resulting from cosmically dynamic interactions of ocean tides, wind, and river flows, has been morbidly upset by human greed. Beginning with the plantations in the 1700s vast forests along the Mississippi and distributary bayous were cleared, wetlands drained, levees erected and canals dug with slave labor. King cotton and queen sugar reigned supreme and befouled their hinterlands until the early twentieth century when the petrochemical industry and shipping industry eclipsed any ecological harm they had ever caused. The shift from agricultural plantations to chemical plants, from the extraction of crops to the extraction of minerals did more than upset the balance. Southern Louisiana is dying today. The land is disappearing. What land remains has been made toxic by the chemical plants and oil wells, dump ponds, slag and waste.

The Deepwater Horizon's explosion, and the "river of oil" now flowing from its ruptured well riser five thousand feet beneath the ocean surface is a catastrophe, the proportions of which are unknown and only beginning to be understood. Usually indifferent to the "everyday" environmental disasters surrounding their city —including almost monthly chemical leaks, explosions and oil spills on relatively smaller scales— New Orleanians can smell the oil coming at their coastline, blown by strong onshore winds.

Estimates of just how much oil is spewing forth from the undersea well are being upped on a daily basis. First BP claimed 1,000 barrels, but now they agree it's 5,000 and up. Some knowledgeable observers estimate that the flow is actually much higher. BP and the government are now desperately throwing resources at the oil slick, but the company's efforts have so far been mismatched to the speed at which the disaster is unfolding. Upset with the slow pace at which the federal government has marshaled resources, some in the Crescent City have already called this "Obama's Katrina," or a "slow-motion Katrina." The administration finally declared the spill an "event of national significance" on Thursday, April 29.
Billions and Trillions

Shrimp are almost cosmic. Their life cycle is fused with geophysical forces - tidal and temperature movements propelled by the sun, earth, and moon, and by unfathomably complex wind patterns. Their life cycle begins far out in the ocean in waters of several hundred feet in depth. There are right now many trillions of shrimp eggs floating in the Gulf of Mexico, suspended in columns of water. April and May are in fact the heaviest spawning months, but the phenomenon occurs year round and follows both seasonal and episodic fluctuations in temperatures and tides.

From their early nauplius and protozoea larva stages they remain in the deep waters, the pelagic zone that is neither close to shore nor the ocean bottom. They move with the current, feeding off anything suspended around them, growing with amazing speed. From this stage to adulthood they provide a source of food for nearly everything that swims around them. They are reduced from many trillions to fewer trillions in number. Into the mysis larva and post-larva stage shrimp begin to move toward shore with flood tides. Strong northerly winds also push them toward the marshes when they rise toward the surface. They continue to feed and grow. From the juvenile through adult phases of their lives they live right along the coast, often letting surface flows, deep currents, and tides push them far into the brackish water marshes. Here they flit among the protection and abundance of the Spartina grass that is absolutely necessary for their survival. They forage along the shallow bottoms of bayous and bays. In these rich saltwater prairies they gain mass and prepare for the final stages in their lives.

Subtle signals in the water, from temperature to salinity, stimulate a final movement among adult shrimp, back out into the ocean. They congregate by the hundreds of millions in bayous and passes at night and await strong tides to pull them back out into the open Gulf where they will forage along the bottom at depths of up to several hundred feed. In this benthic zone they grow to full size and finally, when water temperatures increase, they rise and spawn, floating trillions upon trillions of eggs to renew the cycle.

But there are other sublime numbers beneath the Gulf: billions of barrels of oil and trillions of cubic feet of natural gas. These billions and trillions are measurable as billions of dollars in profits for corporations like BP, Halliburton and other major energy firms. It was with the discovery of oil in the swamps in the early 1900s that Acadiana, paradise found, was lost for good. The industry tore byzantine networks of canals through the marshes in order to reach prospects and haul drilling equipment in on barges. The shipping industry —a large portion of which services the petrochemical refineries upriver of New Orleans, which themselves were sited in proximity to the natural gas fields of the Gulf— did its part also to cut the wetlands into fragments. Concentrated salt water intruded where it should never had. Flood deposits of sediment were reduced and finally deleted as the Mississippi and other major waterways were locked into place. Subsidence, storms, the die-off of cypress and oak forests, and the melting of horizon stretching expanses of prairie grass, it all intensified after World War II. By the 1990s southern Louisiana had seen almost 2000 square miles of land disappear beneath the Gulf's waves. In the early 2000s the rate of land loss was 24 square miles a year, an area larger than Manhattan.

Atë, another word of greek origin comes to mind here. In Greek tragedies atë is the action of a protagonist leading to downfall as a result of their hubris. Atë means defying the gods. Few words better describe the cosmic folly some humans have brought upon the Gulf Coast today: tragic, hubristic nemesis. But here all literal refrains to Greek mythology and language fall flat. Unlike Greek tragedies where the hero brings shame and death upon himself, the slow-Katrina destruction of Acadiana is not clearly the fault of prideful Louisianans over-stretching their limits and pretending to godly levels of knowledge and power. Search as you might, you will find few people more humble and happy with simplicity and sustenance than the majority of New Orleanians, Cajuns, Creoles, Islenos, and African Americans who call southern Louisiana home.

Rather, the death of the wetlands is the result of corporate and state hubris, largely beyond the control of most Louisianans. Their state is being disappeared by a hydrocarbon hungry US economy and the major oil corporations that sit atop it. The gods, the cosmic forces of tides, river flows, winds and temperatures that is, are being defied by a small elite who seek the billions in profits at the expense of trillions of living beings, including millions of Louisianans who live in New Orleans, Houma, St. Bernard Parish, Terrebonne Parish, and down all the bayous.
Orders of Magnitude

The latest National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration projections show that the oil slick from the Macondo blow-out has already reached portions of Louisiana's marshlands around the "bird food," the delta tip where the Mississippi terminates in the Gulf. It's also pushing oil ashore to the north, across portions of Chandeleur Sound's marshes. One internal NOAA estimate (dated April 30) reads:

"Strong SE winds of 15-25 kts are expected to continue through Saturday night. These winds will continue to bring oil towards the shoreline. Oil was observed today within several miles of the Delta between Garden Bay and Pass A Loutre. This could be the leading edge of the tarballs concentrating in the Mississippi River convergence as well as oil from an additional (unrelated) source near platform Ocean Saratoga. Shoreline impacts are likely to begin Thursday evening with the persistent onshore winds."

Documents leaked from NOAA and other federal authorities indicate that the well may soon begin to flow without any restrictions whatsoever, a scenario in which millions of gallons of oil could shoot into the Gulf every day. What is already a major disaster could very well become the second largest oil spill in history. The first, the oil apocalypse unleashed by Saddam Hussein and the United States military during the Gulf War in 1991 resulting in a much as 400 million gallons, would be hard to rival from a single well head, no matter how much pressure it's under. But the second largest spill, from the Ixtoc I well is very much like the Macondo blow-out. Ixtoc I spewed between 450,000 and 500,000 tons of crude oil, also into the Gulf of Mexico between June 1979 and March 1980, the time frame it took for Pemex to cap the well. Ixtoc I released about 10,000 barrels each day, exactly the same amount the Macondo blow-out is probably releasing right now if the latest candid projections of this spill are true.

A NOAA document dated from April 28 reads that:

"[t]wo additional release points were found today in the tangled riser. If the riser pipe deteriorates further, the flow could become unchecked resulting in a release volume an order of magnitude higher than previously thought.

Shrimp might almost be cosmic, but being almost cosmic is by no means unique to them. Many shellfish, fish, birds, crustaceans, and other life forms live in similarly sublime tandems with the tides and winds of the Gulf Coast. And that's the final damning reality of this catastrophic oil leak. Crude spewing from the Deepwater Horizon's well into the Macondo prospect is now riding the same wind-driven waves as the shrimp. It's coming ashore into the wetlands with them. BP and federal authorities have begun using dispersant chemicals to break up the oil patches and sink it beneath the surface. This strategy, however, may prove unwise. It will sink the oil so that it rides the deep currents and affects submarine life.

A 2005 National Academies study on the use of oil dispersants observes that little is actually known about the trade-offs between sinking oil slicks with chemicals versus struggling to contain them on the surface. These are two very different strategies that lead to very different kinds of exposure for sea life. After all, "dispersing" oil is simply a euphemism for sinking it in particulate form where it remains dissolved in columns of water, eventually settling on the ocean floor. For the shrimp, an indicator species in the sense that countless coastal species depend upon them for food, dispersants are perhaps just as bad as letting the slick reach the shore. In the former case they may be killed in open waters by oil particles, or at the bottoms where they feed. In the latter case their marsh habitats may be choked with crude oil. There seems to be no good strategy, just bad and worse. According the National Academies:

"the relative importance of different routes of exposure, that is, the uptake and associated toxicity of oil in the dissolved phase versus dispersed oil droplets versus particulate-associated phase, is poorly understood and not explicitly considered in exposure models. Photoenhanced toxicity has the potential to increase the impact “footprint” of dispersed oil in aquatic organisms, but has only recently received consideration in the assessment of risk associated with spilled oil. One of the widely held assumptions is that chemical dispersion of oil will dramatically reduce the impact to seabirds and aquatic mammals. However, few studies have been conducted since 1989 to validate this assumption."

And that:

"Many studies have shown that oil, floating above subtidal reefs [on the surface], has no adverse effects on the coral; however, if allowed to reach the shoreline, the oil may have long-term impacts to a nearby mangrove system. In addition, oil may persist in the mangrove system creating a chronic source of oil pollution in the adjacent coral reefs. The trade-off would be to consider the use of dispersants. Application of dispersant would result in dispersion of the oil in the water column and so provide some degree of protection to the mangroves; however, the reef system would now have to endure the consequences of an increase in dispersed oil in the water column...."

Furthermore, little is known about the ecosystemic effects of precipitating oil into columns of water, as well as the toxicity of the dispersants themselves, especially when combined with oil.

Is Acadiana lost? In truth the cajuns and their kindred have been losing their idyllic wetlands for decades. Deepwater Horizon may just be the atë, if you will.



This Oil Ride
by Linh Dinh / May 4th, 2010

1861—The first major oil well in the world started pumping. Christened “Empire,” it stood on Funk Farm in Pennsylvania.

1908—The Anglo-Persian Oil Company discovered oil in Iran. This was the first major oil field in the Middle East. APOC would become the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, then British Petroleum, in 1954.

1913—Inspired by disassembly lines inside Chicago slaughterhouses, the Ford Motor Company perfected the assembly line. From this point on, a man must strive to become as efficient and mechanical as a machine.

1927—The Turkish Petroleum Company struck oil in Iraq. Despite its name, TPC was a conglomerate of European companies, with the biggest shareholder the Anglo-Persian Company, i.e., British Petroleum.

1933—In New Jersey, the first drive-in theater opened. Thanks to the car, even a lumpen could have his private carriage. Now, he also had a private box in a theater.

1944—The G.I. Bill helped returning veterans to buy homes, with stipulations that these were detached and in homogenous neighborhoods, i.e., the white suburbs. Like many American laws, this was designed to enrich real estate, car and oil interests.

1953—The C.I.A. orchestrated a coup against the democratically-elected government of Mohammad Mosaddegh, after he had nationalized the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, i.e., British Petroleum.

1956—President Eisenhower began the largest public works project in history, the Interstate. What it is is a generous and continuous system of multi-laned highways. It is never intersected, not even once, by a lesser road. One needs not pause on one’s life’s journey as long as one’s traveling on the Interstate. It is eternity made real and proven, a diagram of heaven (or hell) for the wordless masses.

1962—The Beverly Hillbillies debuted, to become one of the most popular television series of all time. Resonating deeply within the American psyche, its premise might as well be our national myth: a family of hicks struck it rich through oil.

1963—The C.I.A. orchestrated a coup against Abdul Karim Kassem of Iraq. Kassem had begun nationalizing foreign oil companies, most prominently the Iraq Petroleum Company, formerly known as Turkish Petroleum, i.e., British Petroleum.

1967—In “The Graduate,” Mr. McGuire advised Ben, “I just want to say one word to you—just one word.”

“Yes, sir.”

“Are you listening?”

“Yes, I am.”

“Plastics.”

“Exactly how do you mean?”

“There’s a great future in plastics. Think about it. Will you think about it?”

“Yes, I will.”

Plastic is oil, hardened. By 2010, there would be plastic patches the size of Texas to choke both the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans.

Thanks to the chemical phthalate in plastic, male genitals are shrinking worldwide, and sperm counts are way down, though not low enough, unfortunately, to slow down this full-throttle-ahead “love” boat. World population is approaching seven billion, with about 30,000 people starving to death each day.

1990—The Gulf War ignited. Accusing Kuwait of slant drilling into its Rumallah oil field, Iraq invaded its tiny neighbor. Iraq was also bankrupt after its eight-year-long war with Iran. During this previous conflict, the U.S. openly backed Iraq even as it sold weapons to Iran in what became known as the Iran-Contra Affair.

2000—Saddam Hussein announced that Iraq would now only accept euros, and not dollars, for its oil exports. This prompted the U.S. to invade 18 months later.

2001—Dick Cheney, “The American way of life is not negotiable.” Before becoming vice president, Cheney was CEO of Halliburton, an oil services company.

Ari Fleisher, Press Secretary to President Bush, was asked, “Does the President believe that, given the amount of energy Americans consume per capita, how much it exceeds any other citizen in any other country in the world, does the President believe we need to correct our lifestyles to address the energy problem?”

He answered, “That’s a big no. The President believes that it’s an American way of life, and that it should be the goal of policy makers to protect the American way of life. The American way of life is a blessed one.”

With 1/21 of the world’s population and less than 3% of its oil reserve, the U.S. uses 25% of the world’s oil .

Draped in cheap oil and sweating oil, under an increasingly hot sun, I steer an oil car, on oil, towards an oil job. Before meals, I pray and take an oil pill. To feel upper or downer, I chug a lug oil.

2003—Using various pretexts, none convincingly and long since discarded, the U.S. invaded Iraq. The invading force was mostly Anglo. Augmenting 248,000 Americans, the United Kingdom contributed 45,000 troops, Australia 2,000 and Poland 194.

2008—During a debate between Vice Presidential candidates, Joe Biden said, “The only answer is drill, drill, drill. Drill we must,” only to be corrected by Sarah Palin, “The chant is drill, baby, drill! And that’s what we hear all across this country in our rallies, because people are so hungry for domestic sources of energy to be tapped into.”

2009—Thanks to the U.S. invasion, British Petroleum could do business again in Iraq after 37 years.

2010—Floating 5,000 feet above the ocean floor, a British Petroleum rig was drilling 30,000 feet into the earth’s crust when it exploded, then sank over its drill hole. 210,000 gallons a day are spilling as I’m writing this, and they won’t be capped any time soon. This is no tanker breaking up, my friends, but the raped earth spewing what we’ve been demanding so relentlessly for over a century now. A monstrous ecocide, this is too fitting an end to our reckless oil ride.
Last edited by seemslikeadream on Tue May 04, 2010 12:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Fingers Point at Haliburton as Potential Cause of Gulf Oil

Postby barracuda » Tue May 04, 2010 12:36 pm

Cleanup specialists not optimistic

Despite the furious efforts of some cleanup crews wielding sophisticated equipment, experts believe most of the oil that is leaking into the Gulf of Mexico will likely make it to shore.

How much oil can be scoured from the waves will depend in part on weather and tides – and on the technology that the oil and gas industry can bring to bear on not only cleaning up the spill but stopping the underwater leak.

But those who work in oil-catastrophe response are not optimistic.

Mike Miller, chief executive officer of SafetyBOSS Inc., a Calgary-based company that gained renown for its response to burning oil wells in Kuwait, thinks it’s unlikely even 10 per cent will be picked up before it hits shore. Joel Hogue, the president of Ohio-based oil spill training firm Elemental Services & Consulting, Inc., says 25 per cent is about what people should hope for.

That still leaves a vast quantity of oil that crews may be unable to prevent from washing onto the marshes, beaches and harbours that line the Gulf of Mexico.

Cleaning up a spill is “like trying to capture a greased watermelon,” Mr. Hogue explained. “You do the best you can.”

The problem stems from a well 1,500 metres below surface that continues to pour oil into the water. Officials have said 5,000 barrels a day are escaping, although The Wall Street Journal reported it could be as high as 25,000. At that rate, the current disaster has nearly equalled the amount of oil leaked by the 1989 crash of the oil tanker Exxon Valdez into an Alaskan reef.

Mr. Miller, whose firm has helped stop out-of-control wells across the world, faulted first-response crews for making a bad situation much worse.

When an explosion on the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig ignited a massive fire on April 20, fire boats raced to put it out. Pictures show at least four vessels pumping massive streams of water onto the rig.

That was a mistake, Mr. Miller said.

“Why they put the fire out is beyond me,” he said. “Basically once it was burning it’s not going to get any worse. But when they pulled all those fire boats out there, the result was they sunk the rig by filling it full of water.”


He blames the oil leak on that act, since the sinking oil rig took with it the main connection to the well, which is located 1,500 metres below water. That allowed oil to leak out. Had the fire been left alone, the oil would have burned instead – a more palatable choice, he said.
The most dangerous traps are the ones you set for yourself. - Phillip Marlowe
User avatar
barracuda
 
Posts: 12890
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California
Blog: View Blog (0)

Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests