Is Porn Bad for You?

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Is Porn Bad for You?

Postby Nordic » Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:52 pm

beeline wrote:.

Without porn, I'd never get laid.

.


I used to say that about alcohol. :)
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Is Porn Bad for You?

Postby Sounder » Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:12 pm

It’s not unreasonable to see both Puritanism and hedonism as major contributors to the porn industry. Is porn, itself, bad for you? Don’t know, but I do not much care for Puritanism or hedonism.

Personally, I do not see the appeal of stimulation without relationship.

OK, OK, I see the appeal, but I think it gets in the way of honest interpersonal relations more often than it inspires any kind of rich experience.
All these things will continue as long as coercion remains a central element of our mentality.
Sounder
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Is Porn Bad for You?

Postby Nordic » Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:47 am

Sounder wrote:It’s not unreasonable to see both Puritanism and hedonism as major contributors to the porn industry. Is porn, itself, bad for you? Don’t know, but I do not much care for Puritanism or hedonism.

Personally, I do not see the appeal of stimulation without relationship.

OK, OK, I see the appeal, but I think it gets in the way of honest interpersonal relations more often than it inspires any kind of rich experience.



It's not supposed to inspire any kind of rich experience. It's supposed to facilitate you cleaning out your pipes. That's about it. It's like blowing your nose. Sometimes you just gotta blow your nose.

People seem to read an awful lot into something that is about as meaningful as clipping your toenails.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Is Porn Bad for You?

Postby semper occultus » Fri Jul 16, 2010 8:34 pm

After 17 pages of rambling I think at last we have a definitive answer :

Nanny, 30, died from sexual arousal while watching pornography

www.dailymail.co.uk
Last updated at 12:12 PM on 9th July 2010

A 30-year-old woman's death as she used a sex toy while watching pornography was probably due to her state of sexual excitement, an inquest heard today.
Children's nanny Nichola Paginton was found dead in bed naked from the waist down last October with pornographic material running on her laptop. A sex toy was discovered next to her.

Image
Heart failure: Nicola Paginton died after becoming sexually aroused
A Home Office pathologist told the inquest in Gloucester that Miss Paginton died from a sudden heart arrhythmia, probably brought on by her state of arousal.
Gloucestershire coroner Alan Crickmore agreed it was likely that 'her activity before death' contributed to the fatal arrhythmia.

The inquest heard that Miss Paginton, of Cirencester, was found dead in October last year.

Detective Sergeant Gavin Webb said police had been called by her employer Sarah Griffiths who had visited Miss Paginton's home when she failed to turn up for work.
When there was no reply at the door she enlisted the help of neighbour Michelle Grant and they saw Miss Paginton through the curtains, lying on her bed with her cat lying on her chest.
'After they broke in they realised Miss Paginton was dead,' said Sgt Webb. 'She had a computer on her lap and when they moved it and lifted the duvet, they found she was naked from the waist down and there was a vibrator in the bed.

'The laptop was still displaying pornographic material.'
Home office pathologist Dr Richard Jones from the University of Cardiff said: 'There is nothing to explain why she died in this way but I suspect sudden cardiac death.'
Returning a verdict of death from natural causes, Mr Crickmore said: 'I am satisfied Nichola Paginton died of a natural disease process - sudden cardiac arryhthmia.
'It is not always possible to determine an exact cause of death but it is likely that her activity before death contributed towards it.'
User avatar
semper occultus
 
Posts: 2974
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 2:01 pm
Location: London,England
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Is Porn Bad for You?

Postby Project Willow » Fri Jul 16, 2010 9:49 pm

semper occultus wrote:After 17 pages of rambling I think at last we have a definitive answer :

Nanny, 30, died from sexual arousal while watching pornography


Yes, yes, yes, a definitive answer because here a woman is served up as cautionary tale to all others, meant perhaps to spur a small strain of neo-Victorianism. Do not pursue satisfying arousal is the subtext, it may be deadly, just as sports were said to be a hundred years ago, or going swimming during your period.

Baaah, what a load of tripe.

Markus Parzeller1 Contact Information, Roman Bux1, Christoph Raschka1 and Hansjörgen Bratzke1
(1) Centre of Legal Medicine, University Hospital of the Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Kennedyallee 104, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Accepted: 7 February 2006
Abstract In recent discussions about potency-enhancing drugs such as sildenafil, health hazards associated with sexual activity have attracted increasing attention (1). In a medicolegal postmortem study performed in the Center of Legal Medicine at the University Hospital in Frank furt/Main over a 33-year period (1972–2004), about 32,000 forensic autopsies revealed 68 (0.22%) natural deaths occurring during sexual activity. Except for 5 women (7.4%; average age 39.8 years), in most cases, men were involved (92.6%; average age 59.1 years). The most frequent cause of death was myocardial infarction (n=28; 41.2%). In three cases, pericardial tamponade accompanied by myomalacia were observed. In 20 patients (29.4%), coronary artery disease (CAD) without signs of acute myocardial infarction (MI) was diagnosed. The medical history of 19 of the deceased indicated previous MI. There were seven cerebral hemorrhages (10.3%). The annual incidence of sudden cardiovascular death during sexual activity is estimated to be 1.9 per 1000 autopsies for men and 0.16 per 1000 autopsies for women (1). It is necessary to inform patients with CAD about prodromes and risk in relation to any form of physical and/or emotional stress.
User avatar
Project Willow
 
Posts: 4798
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Seattle
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: Is Porn Bad for You?

Postby Simulist » Fri Jul 16, 2010 10:16 pm

If she'd been getting her hate on at a political convention or while watching the 700 Club — and that had triggered her arrhythmia — the establishment media wouldn't have given a damn.

'Cause, you know, hate is "normal," and sexual independence is "deviant."
"The most strongly enforced of all known taboos is the taboo against knowing who or what you really are behind the mask of your apparently separate, independent, and isolated ego."
    — Alan Watts
User avatar
Simulist
 
Posts: 4713
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:13 pm
Location: Here, and now.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Is Porn Bad for You?

Postby No_Baseline » Fri Jul 16, 2010 10:32 pm

yes, yes, a definitive answer because here a woman is served up as cautionary tale to all others, meant perhaps to spur a small strain of neo-Victorianism. Do not pursue satisfying arousal is the subtext, it may be deadly, just as sports were said to be a hundred years ago, or going swimming during your period.

Baaah, what a load of tripe.



I couldn't help but crinkle my face in a WTF expression when reading the couple of last posts to this thread, and laugh my arse off when reading yours, PW, thank you
User avatar
No_Baseline
 
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 9:40 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Is Porn Bad for You?

Postby barracuda » Fri Jul 16, 2010 10:57 pm

She's kinda my new auntie-hero.
The most dangerous traps are the ones you set for yourself. - Phillip Marlowe
User avatar
barracuda
 
Posts: 12890
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Is Porn Bad for You?

Postby brekin » Wed Jul 28, 2010 2:00 pm

Haven't read this book, but thought she made a lot of articulate points here.

Pornland: How Porn Has Hijacked Our Sexuality

http://pulsemedia.org/2010/06/29/gail-d ... sexuality/

In today’s world, sex has become commodified and industrialized. We see it all the time in print publications, television commercials, cable television shows, major motion pictures, and adult entertainment. Pornography is a multi-billion dollar industry that misuses and abuses sex and represents it in disturbing ways. Pornographers sell and produce films based on teen sex, torture porn, humiliation, and/or racist caricatures. What’s more disturbing is that hard-core porn is becoming more mainstream in society.

Dr. Gail Dines is a professor of sociology and women’s studies at Wheelock College and an expert on pornography. Her new book, Pornland: How Porn Has Hijacked Our Sexuality, has just been released by Beacon Press and is considered a groundbreaking study of how today’s pornography shapes men and women’s ideas, attitudes, and perceptions of sex. Here is what Dines has to say about her new book and the effects of pornography.

In the preface of your book, you share a personal story about a conversation you had with your son over pornography. You write, “I said [to him] that should he decide to use porn, that he was going to hand over his sexuality—a sexuality that he had yet to grow into, that made sense for who he was and who he was going to be—to someone else.” How and why do boys and young men give their power away to pornography? What kind of power does pornography have in shaping boys’ and men’s perceptions, attitudes, and beliefs toward sex?

Dr. Gail Dines

Boys and men don’t realize the power they’re giving away to pornography. They don’t understand the power it has to shape who they are, their sexuality, and their sexual identity. In this culture, we think of pornography as a joke or something to laugh about. We don’t take it seriously as a source of information that has the ability and power to impact on the way we think about the world. Most boys and men go to pornography for an ejaculation; they come away with a lot more. I don’t think they’re quite aware of it.

Pornography, like all images, tells stories about the world. It tells stories about women, men, sexuality, and intimacy. In pornography, intimacy is something to be avoided, and—as I say in the book—“In pornography nobody makes love. They all make hate.” The man makes hate to the woman’s body. It’s about the destruction of intimacy.

Is it true that what most boys and men see in current trends of pornography are things that they expect in sex? How did that happen, and how is it impacting on boys’ and men’s perceptions, attitudes, and beliefs toward sex?

Well, a lot of people don’t know what pornography is. The first thing I do in the book is very purposefully describe it in detail. I know that for many people it’s going to be hard to read. I understand that. But if you’re really going to understand what I’m saying and why I’m saying it, then you have to understand the material I’m talking about. A lot of older men and women think I’m talking about Playboy from 15 years ago: a centerfold or a woman with no clothes on smiling in a cornfield. They think, “What’s wrong with that?” Well, that was bad enough in the way it objectified women, but we’re on a whole new level now with this kind of imagery.

How it got to this point is the Internet. It made it more accessible, affordable, and anonymous. You’re seeing a massive rise in use, and the users are getting younger and younger. Children who are 11½ years old are now looking at pornography because it comes straight into the home. There’s no limit on how much you can access. It used to be you had to steal father’s Playboy or Penthouse. Use was limited to how much you could actually pilfer. Today it is unlimited.

So what happens is that desensitization sets in that much quicker and that much earlier. In order to keep the consumer base going, the pornographers have to keep upping the ante. They make it more violent, body-punishing, or abusive as a way to keep men interested. When you think about it, if you’re exposed to it at age 11 or 12, you’re jaded by 20. You’re certainly jaded by 30. Pornography bleeds sex dry of intimacy, emotions, and connection. Once you do that, then there’s not much left. It becomes boring and mechanical. So you have to keep feeding newer and newer ideas just to keep [the audience] interested.

You describe Gonzo porn as “body-punishing sex.” Why is it body-punishing, why is it prevalent today, and what do people need to know about it?


It’s body-punishing because the male performers pound away at a woman’s body. You often see three men orally, vaginally, and anally penetrate her over and over again for 20 minutes or more, and these are often Viagra-fortified penises, so they stay hard much longer. A woman’s body has limits. All of ours do. What you see in Gonzo porn is a woman’s anus that is red and sore and a swollen vagina. All of these things happen because of the way a woman’s body is treated. Even the pornography industry says that Gonzo is very demanding and potentially dangerous for women. If the industry is saying it, then there’s certainly a problem.

What I’ve found with my interviews with men is the more they watch, the more they want porn sex, because they become habituated to that kind of industrial-strength sex. Once you become habituated to that, anything else looks boring or uninteresting. What I find is that some men lose interest in their partners altogether and use more pornography. Other men nag and cajole their girlfriends to perform porn sex, or they use prostitutes because that’s who they think they can play this porn sex out on.

Remember that you are not just reading or looking at porn. You’re actively masturbating and having an orgasm to it. It has a very visceral response in the body. This is one of the reasons it is so powerful.

How/why does pornography misuse and abuse the concepts of sex and how/why does pornography normalize the idea that pain is pleasure?

Well, it’s because of the way the woman’s body is treated. In pornography, no matter what you do to her, no matter how much you physically or verbally abuse this woman, she loves it. She can’t get enough. What I find fascinating and upsetting at the same time is…

Men believe that!

… That’s right. They believe it. I’ve had men argue with me that they believe women like it. So when I say to them, “What’s your evidence? Have you seen any empirical studies? Have you interviewed these women?” No, of course they haven’t. They’re using the text as their evidence because she’s saying “I love it! Give it to me harder!,” when of course she has no choice. First of all, she wants to get paid. She has to say that, and if she wants to continue working in pornography, she has no choice.

I often hear that women actively seek “body-punishing sex,” talk about liking it and desiring it, and write about it in non-pornographic, sex-related blogs, periodicals, and other forms of media. Sometimes I hear people say that degrading acts of sex can be intimate. Why is this perception wrong, and how has pornography made people think this way? Why is this an unhealthy perception of sex?

Because it distorts what women want, who they are, and the kind of sex they want to have. I don’t want to say there’s nobody who wants that kind of sex. In any society, you’re going to have variations on what people want.

The problem with pornography is that it normalizes that which is a minority preference for many women. That’s all you see in pornography. You never see anybody say, “Let’s hold, let’s kiss, let’s do all of these things.” Everyone in pornography wants it as hard and fast as possible.

So what they do is they normalize something very unusual in the culture. The more men look at pornography, the more they actually think that this is what women want, especially because they have no counterbalance to it. There is very little sex education today in this country outside of pornography that really speaks to boys and young men.

I’m sure you’ve heard the common response that “no one is forcing a gun on women to perform these acts, and they are doing it by choice.” Why is that a common justification for porn, and what is wrong with that argument?

I think that’s a very apolitical and de-contextualized understanding of choice. The majority of women in pornography—and it’s true in prostitution as well—are not women who have medical and law degrees, and they’re not choosing between practicing medicine or going into pornography. The women are usually working class women who are looking at minimum-wage jobs and who have been sold an image of pornography, that it’s glamorous. They see people like Jenna Jameson or Sasha Grey with all of their pop culture celebrity status.

Recently, Jameson was on Oprah Winfrey, and there was no real analysis of what happens to women in pornography. What they did is glamorize it by showing the wealth Jameson accumulated. What they don’t show is that for every Jameson there are tens of thousands of women who end up poor, drug-addicted, incur bodily problems and diseases. And often a lot of the women are there for only a short time. They have a very short shelf life, and many of them end up in brothels of Nevada. They don’t end up in a huge mansion with lots of fancy cars and beautiful clothes.

Another common attitude or belief boys and men have toward pornography is “Well, that’s just a fantasy and I wouldn’t act that out in real life.” Do you see that as an excuse to legitimize pornography? Why is that problematic?

I address this in my book. As progressive people, we cannot bear that the right-wing media has the power to construct ideology in this country. None of us who are progressive will look at Fox News and say, “It’s just imagery; it’s just a fantasy; and it has no effect.” People can tell the difference between media and reality. We know media has the power to shift views and consolidate right-wing ideology.

Pornography is also a form of media representation. So why is it that Fox News and Rush Limbaugh have the power to change and shape society, and suddenly pornography is the only media form that has no effect? This whole fantasy issue is totally ludicrous. It takes no account of how images construct reality.

While pornography is pushing the boundaries of sex, it’s also making its way into more and more mainstream media. What are the most prevalent examples of porn being accepted or seen as “normal,” and how is it being legitimized?

One example I talk about in Pornland is Brazilian waxes. They come straight down from the pornography industry. Most of the female students I meet across the country have no pubic hair whatsoever. Their boyfriends don’t like it, and I’ve even heard of cases where boys won’t have any sex with women if they have any hair. Where did this come from? When I was growing up, if somebody did that, you would think something was wrong with them. Suddenly girls are increasingly taking all of their pubic hair off and getting bikini waxes.

Another example is the way in which the pornographic and prostitution culture is being glamorized. Women can now take pole-dancing lessons. They wear clothing that looks like they just stepped out of pornography. You see it everywhere, and women are capitulating to men’s sexual demands because there are very few alternative ways of being female in this culture.

Another example of pornography having power is in the hook-up culture that’s taking place on college campuses. What is hook-up sex? It’s porn sex. It’s the same thing. It’s anonymous, non-intimate, and disconnected sex, and everyone is having hook-up sex in pornography. Increasingly, what’s interesting is that women and girls are consenting to hook-ups even though studies show that they experience less sexual pleasure than men and are more likely to be raped in such situations.

Pornography today is being mainstreamed by the likes of Howard Stern, “Maxim” magazine, or the “Girls Gone Wild” series. You also mention the series “Sex and the City” in your book. How does the show shape perceptions of pornography, especially for women?


In “Sex and the City,” pornography is kind of a minor character on the show. It pops up a few times with men masturbating to porn and wanting to bring it into the bedroom. These women on “Sex and the City” were not outraged. Some of them didn’t like it but rarely complained. A lot of men in “Sex and the City” wanted porn sex, hook-up sex, urination sex, and other things that come from pornography. What you saw in “Sex and the City” was women hooking up and then feeling empowered by it, when in reality what they really wanted—and what made “Sex and the City” such a conservative show—was to settle down with a guy. The series was all about finding Mr. Right.

In Pornland you discuss racism in pornography. Oftentimes I hear, “They’re not racist, they’re just funny titles.” How prevalent is racism in pornography, and is it being diminished or trivialized by consumers and producers alike? Why hasn’t most of society picked up on this element?

One in four new videos to hit the market is interracial, which is sex between a black man and a white woman. Today’s interracial videos depict body-punishing sex. A black man’s penis is referred to as “gigantic,” “huge,” and “monstrous,” and the images reduce black men to their penises, which has historical resonance in this culture. Black women are portrayed as extremely animalistic, uncontrollable, and deviant in their sexuality. Now what happens is when you show these images over and over, it reinforces the way white people think about people of color, because in this country one of the ways in which they have rendered invisible racist ideology is by sexualizing it.

Why haven’t many people picked up on this racist element in pornography?

I think most of them don’t know. When I tell people, they’re shocked. If you ask the men who use pornography, they’re not. But these men, once aroused and eager to find an image to masturbate to, are not in any mood to start doing a critical deconstruction of the text.

One of the main reasons why interracial porn is so popular with white men, which is the main consumer base, is if pornography is about the dehumanization of women, what better way to dehumanize a white woman in the eyes of white men than to see her being penetrated over and over by something they view as depraved, the black male body?

People or individuals who try to explain that sex is about intimacy, caring, sharing, and trust in a relationship are often cast off as “prudish,” “a tight-ass,” “a religious nut,” or “someone who isn’t getting any.” How difficult has it been to explain this aspect of sex and how pornography strips it of any human connection? Why is there such aversion to sex based on equality and respect?

I think there is a real fear of being labeled anti-sex. The way pornographers and their allies have sold this is that you’re either pro-pornography or you’re anti-sex. Which of course is ludicrous because pornography is not the same as sex. Pornography is an industrial product. It commodifies human needs and sells it back to people, often in an unrecognizable form. It is not simply a reflection of reality. It is a specific representation of it and it is a specific way of representing sex.

Now to assume that if you are against pornography you’re against sex, is to assume that anyone who criticizes McDonald’s is anti-eating. People who criticize McDonald’s are against the destruction of the environment, against the assault on healthy foods, and against child obesity. They are against an industrial product. They are not against eating. So why can’t they see that it is the same thing when it comes to pornography and sex?

Given the prevalence of pornography today, that demand for pornography is going up, not down, and that sex acts are getting more and more violent, degrading, and humiliating for men and women, are you hopeful that things can be turned around?

To turn this around there needs to be a massive public health awareness campaign. Unless people begin to understand the role pornography is playing in our culture, I can’t see any reason that this won’t get worse, because all of these men who started watching pornography young are going to want more and more. Pornographers themselves say they’re having trouble keeping up with what fans want because they want it so hardcore.

Where is this going to end? I don’t know. What will an 11-year-old boy want 10, 20, or 30 years from now? Nobody knows. The truth is we’ve never brought up a generation of males with hardcore pornography. No one can really say what’s going to happen. What we do know, from how images and media affect people, is that it’s going to increasingly shape the way men think about sex, sexuality, and relationships.
If I knew all mysteries and all knowledge, and have not charity, I am nothing. St. Paul
I hang onto my prejudices, they are the testicles of my mind. Eric Hoffer
User avatar
brekin
 
Posts: 3229
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:21 pm
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: Is Porn Bad for You?

Postby brekin » Fri Aug 06, 2010 5:11 pm

Laurence Fishburne's daughter reveals the hurt caused by her X-rated movie
http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/lifestyl ... ls_7854229

'My dad's very upset'

CSI actor Laurence Fishburne is 'very hurt' that his 19-year-old daughter is set to star in an X-rated porn movie to be released later this month, and it is Montana Fishburne herself who has revealed the trouble that she has caused in her family.

'My dad is very upset,' she told TMZ.com. 'I heard that he's mad at me but I haven't spoken to him yet. I feel pretty confident that I can work things out with him.' The young wannabe actress is making a porn film in conjunction with Vivid Entertainment, TMZ is reporting. The adult film giant is behind the distribution of several celebrity sex tapes including those starring Kendra Wilkinson, Kim Kardashian and Paris Hilton, but unlike the other famous stars, Montana is not claiming that her tape was stolen or illegally 'leaked'. 'I view making this movie as an important first step in my career,' said Montana. She added: 'I've watched how successful Kim Kardashian became and I think a lot of it was due to the release of her sex tape. I'm hoping the same magic will work for me. I'm impatient about getting well known and having more opportunities, and this seemed like a great way to get started on it.'

Laurence Fishburne's Daughter: I've Always Wanted to Be a Porn Star

http://www.people.com/people/article/0, ... 52,00.html

Laurence Fishburne's Daughter: I've Always Wanted to Be a Porn Star

Laurence Fishburne's daughter is speaking out about her controversial decision to enter the entertainment industry by becoming a porn star.

"Being in an adult film is not a big deal to me," Montana Fishburne, 18, tells PEOPLE. "It's something I always wanted to do. I have always been comfortable in my body and with my sexuality."

And no, she's not hoping her adult film, which will be released by Vivid Entertainment on Aug. 10, will spawn a mainstream acting career. "I am not in porn to get into acting. I am in porn because I wanted to be in porn," she says bluntly.

The daughter of the CSI star, an Academy Award nominated actor, said she didn't seek her parents' approval before signing on for the film.

"I had already filmed it by the time they knew so I didn't give them a chance to talk me out of it," says Montana, who moved out of her father's house last year upon turning 18, "so I could pursue what I want to do without being constrained by them."

Her father is understandably devastated, she confesses.

"I hear through relatives that he's upset but I haven't talked to him directly for him to tell me his feelings," she admits, saying that when she did break the news, he reacted with stunned silence.

"I hope it's not hurting him. It wasn't done to hurt him," she says. "But I think it will take time and talking through the issues. Eventually, I hope he will be proud of me."

A rep for Laurence Fishburne declined to comment.
If I knew all mysteries and all knowledge, and have not charity, I am nothing. St. Paul
I hang onto my prejudices, they are the testicles of my mind. Eric Hoffer
User avatar
brekin
 
Posts: 3229
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:21 pm
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: Is Porn Bad for You?

Postby Nordic » Fri Aug 06, 2010 9:28 pm

Well, you can thank Kim Kardashian for that one.

Is civilization over yet? Seems like it sometimes.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Is Porn Bad for You?

Postby Wilbur Whatley » Fri Aug 06, 2010 11:20 pm

Who the fuck is Kim Kardashian?

What a depressing turn to this thread. Poor Laurence Fishburne. Seriously. How could he ever get over this?

Of course porn is bad for you. Although some of it, like some vintage porn from Denmark in the 1970s and 1980s, may present a counterargument.

Painful and confusing topic.

:oops:
Wilbur Whatley
 
Posts: 401
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 12:41 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Is Porn Bad for You?

Postby Nordic » Sat Aug 07, 2010 4:21 am

Kim Kardashian is a spoiled rich chick from Los Angeles whose father is a big-time wealthy defense attorney and whose stepfather is -- and this is really gaggable -- a plastic-surgery altered and utterly emasculated Bruce Jenner, who decided that being rich and spoiled wasn't enough, she wanted to be famous, so she deliberately made a sex tape and released it upon the world.

It worked. Now she does huge endorsement deals, TV commercials, makes even more money than she already has, does personal appearances for lotsa money, and has her own reality show with her sisters.

Other women are simply following suit.

What's really disturbing is that a lot of young women, high school age girls, really admire Kim Kardashian. One of them must be the Fishburne girl. Just following in the footsteps of her role model.

While I don't have a problem with porn itself, I have a problem with the mainstream media's recent glorification of it, insofar as the media is turning porn stars into "regular" celebrities. It's bogus and just another media mind-fuck.

If you ask me, Kim Kardashian is a simple prostitute.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Is Porn Bad for You?

Postby brekin » Sun Aug 08, 2010 4:04 pm

What I find interesting about the Montana Fishburne story is I assume she is both:

A) already somewhat rich because her father has had a long successful film career.
B) already somewhat famous for the same reason.

Why then would she feel such an urgency to do a porn movie? At 18? And when she says
"It's something I always wanted to do." since when? High School? Junior High?

I have to admit though I never knew who Paris Hilton or Kim K. was until they broke with their
"not meant for public" :lol2: sex tapes. It says a lot about the hyper-competitive shallow world of
the young-famous-by-birth Hollywood set though when this is just seen more and more as a
calculated career move.
If I knew all mysteries and all knowledge, and have not charity, I am nothing. St. Paul
I hang onto my prejudices, they are the testicles of my mind. Eric Hoffer
User avatar
brekin
 
Posts: 3229
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:21 pm
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: Is Porn Bad for You?

Postby barracuda » Sun Aug 08, 2010 4:32 pm

Nordic wrote:If you ask me, Kim Kardashian is a simple prostitute.


When her sex tape came out, Kardashian filed an invasion of privacy suit against Vivid Entertainment, and she eventually settled for an estimated five million dollars and prevented the further distribution of the tape by Vivid. Of course the fact that she is the daughter of one of the most famous attorneys on the planet might have helped her cause, but nonetheless, nothing about the case could easily be described as "simple".
The most dangerous traps are the ones you set for yourself. - Phillip Marlowe
User avatar
barracuda
 
Posts: 12890
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 151 guests