Vets Get Ecstasy to Treat Their PTSD

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Vets Get Ecstasy to Treat Their PTSD

Postby wordspeak2 » Sat Sep 04, 2010 1:55 pm

Btw, I'd also like to respond to Penguin, who said, " research like this is simply aiding in the continuation of the atrocities." I've heard that argument made, Penguin. I'm as anti-war as can possibly be, but I can't say that I agree. I'm on MAPS's listserv, and I know that they're taking the approach that they're taking simply because they think that it's strategic. Veterans are the most traumatized group of people out there. MDMA undeniably assists miraculously in the treatment of extreme trauma. I can attest to that. It's the perfect medicine for that kind of thing. Cannabis helps too, yes, but MDMA has a unique way of showing you a new light and allowing you to move on from the past. I have two friends who have also been using it for the past couple years to try to consciously break out of some real darkness from their very troubled, abuse-filled lives, and have also found it to be a savior, and one of the two doesn't even smoke pot.
MAPS is trying to get psychedelic drugs and cannabis regulated in a clinical setting. I think it's a profound goal. Psychedelic compounds can totally change lives like nothing else can. MAPS is focusing on MDMA for PTSD because it feel that this is the campaign it's most likely to win. If they can get MDMA regulated for people with extreme PTSD, that opens an important door to a lot more. I agree that soldiers are complicit in war by virtue of signing up for the army. But they're still people, too, and there's wrong with helping them. If psychedelic drugs can heal people from the extreme psychological sickness of coping with having seen the absolute worst hell imaginable... just think of what else they could do.
wordspeak2
 
Posts: 1209
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Massachusetts
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Vets Get Ecstasy to Treat Their PTSD

Postby hava1 » Sat Sep 04, 2010 2:12 pm

penguin without getting into pro/con mdma, people have the right not to be unwitting subjects of drug experiments,period. that includes the right of israeli psych patients not to serve the benefit of US ptsd afflicted veterans, in particular.

The teeth issue has been exposed in the press, while exposing that Kotler experiment on....female rape victims of course and not on american vets.

I disagree with the right of anyone to drug people, for their own good included. Some people dont eat meat, some dont like drugs.

I really cant say much about mdma, except I think it makes people susceptible to promiscuity in certain conditions, etc. Plus people react to drugs very differently, given their makeup and the circumstances, definitely they cannot benefit from being force drugged. that's the last of it here, since I obviously sidetracked the issue.

I shouldve opened a thread on "do israelis have a right not to be experimented on unethically for the welfare of american soldiers". maybe I will.
hava1
 
Posts: 1141
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 1:07 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Vets Get Ecstasy to Treat Their PTSD

Postby Nordic » Sat Sep 04, 2010 2:59 pm

Maybe I'm stating the obvious, but ecstasy use is huge among young teens here in Southern California.

My stepdaughter is 14 and the other night we had a big long conversation about drugs. She's not interested in any of them except for X. I could definitely pick up on that. She's mainly interested in raves, and I know she would love raves, it fits right into her personality.

What's really disturbing here is that raves are now big corporate sponsored events. I have a big problem with that. These corporations are sponsoring huge huge raves, with carnival rides and everything else, with the express desire to get kids to go. Then they make money selling them shit (especially water for airport prices per bottle).

It's one thing for raves to be underground events, but to have them backed with big money, and marketed, and I mean MARKETED to the teen crowd with the underlying ASSUMPTION (wink wink nudge nudge) that these underage kids are all gonna be blasted out of their minds on street drugs that are cut with god-knows-what (and we personally know people who have been poisoned by strychnine, PCB's, and meth in their X pills) is just heinous.

Recently a 15 year old girl died at one of these here. It was her first rave and she cooked her brain on the shit. They say that somehow she took way too much X. She was there with her friends, no adult supervision, nothing.

It's a fucked up scene, and it's just so completely wrong.

If there was a way to know you were getting pure MDMA that would be another matter entirely. But it's NOT.

I guess it's sort of off-topic as to the OP, but just wanted to throw that out there.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Vets Get Ecstasy to Treat Their PTSD

Postby Penguin » Sat Sep 04, 2010 3:07 pm

wordspeak2 wrote:Btw, I'd also like to respond to Penguin, who said, " research like this is simply aiding in the continuation of the atrocities." I've heard that argument made, Penguin. I'm as anti-war as can possibly be, but I can't say that I agree. I'm on MAPS's listserv, and I know that they're taking the approach that they're taking simply because they think that it's strategic. Veterans are the most traumatized group of people out there. MDMA undeniably assists miraculously in the treatment of extreme trauma. I can attest to that. It's the perfect medicine for that kind of thing. Cannabis helps too, yes, but MDMA has a unique way of showing you a new light and allowing you to move on from the past.


Sure, I don't disagree, and know both - have also followed MAPS with interest since ages ago. I worded it a bit badly, I did. Should have been "might aid". And that its sad that only when treating war traumas the authorities might consider maybe allowing the use of something semi-entheogenic...

What I meant was that I worry a bit that research like this will be used by the army also to keep men fighting better after suffering mental trauma, or some such scenario. Is all.

Nordic, only an illegal underground rave is a rave. Those legal clubs or mega-events, no thank you. Your concern is legit. And drug dealers don't mostly give a shit about what poison they sell you, if they even know.
Penguin
 
Posts: 5089
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 5:56 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Vets Get Ecstasy to Treat Their PTSD

Postby Montag » Sat Sep 04, 2010 3:22 pm

hava1 wrote:unethical experimentation on same had been conducted by US research centers here in Israel on helpless unwitting patients of psychiatric institutes (one exposed by press, about 10 years ago, in Beer Sheva psychiatric hospital, a notorious guinea pig zone for the military). Apparently, the initial ecstasy trade by israel had been connected somehow to those experiments, but later took a life of its own :) and became a drug trafficking business associated with Israeli mafia.
Ecstasy harms the teeth, and I dont suppose anyone will assume the bills for that...
American research on PTSD, in Israel, is a huge market, and there seem to be no monitoring of the exportation of violations of human rights. My lame attempts, about 7 years ago to contact the monitoring group of ralph nader's org in DC, that exposed the nigerians trovan scandal, failed. Most of the lawyers that do that (very few...) are Jewish and the last thing they want is to deal with violations of human rights of Israelis, by the USA. the PTSD business interest in Israel (by the USA) can be investigated by that group who is going to investigate human experimentation by US military (the one PW is connected with). a lot of stuff...


I didn't take hava as anti-semitic... Is hava Jewish? It sounds like he lives in Israel.
User avatar
Montag
 
Posts: 1259
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 4:32 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Vets Get Ecstasy to Treat Their PTSD

Postby norton ash » Sat Sep 04, 2010 3:25 pm

MDMA > ECT. (IMHO.)
Zen horse
User avatar
norton ash
 
Posts: 4067
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 5:46 pm
Location: Canada
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Vets Get Ecstasy to Treat Their PTSD

Postby undead » Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:43 pm

hava1 wrote:penguin without getting into pro/con mdma, people have the right not to be unwitting subjects of drug experiments,period. that includes the right of israeli psych patients not to serve the benefit of US ptsd afflicted veterans, in particular.

The teeth issue has been exposed in the press, while exposing that Kotler experiment on....female rape victims of course and not on american vets.

I disagree with the right of anyone to drug people, for their own good included. Some people dont eat meat, some dont like drugs.

I really cant say much about mdma, except I think it makes people susceptible to promiscuity in certain conditions, etc. Plus people react to drugs very differently, given their makeup and the circumstances, definitely they cannot benefit from being force drugged. that's the last of it here, since I obviously sidetracked the issue.

I shouldve opened a thread on "do israelis have a right not to be experimented on unethically for the welfare of american soldiers". maybe I will.


Nobody is being forced to take MDMA. You are lying and making shit up. You have yet to back up your unsubstantiated claims. So far all post war on drugs MDMA research has been conducted with volunteers. Certainly there is no lack of willing volunteers, anywhere. The unethical human experimentation you speak of is practiced in every psychiatric hospital that exists, using toxic psychiatric drugs like SSRIs, anticonvulsants, antipsychotics, and benzodiazepenes. MDMA is one of the only drugs that they will never even give to a person in a psychiatric institution, never mind force them.

Nordic wrote:If there was a way to know you were getting pure MDMA that would be another matter entirely. But it's NOT.


Actually, there is a way to tell if you are getting pure MDMA. It's called a test kit and anyone can buy one for 5 or 10 dollars on the interwebs. Or you could also be a MAPS volunteer.
┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐
User avatar
undead
 
Posts: 997
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:23 am
Location: Doumbekistan
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: Vets Get Ecstasy to Treat Their PTSD

Postby wordspeak2 » Sat Sep 04, 2010 7:01 pm

Yeah, people forced to take MDMA- that's quite a trip. So where'd you hear that one? Um, how about talking about people being forced to take *psychiatric drugs,* which happens constantly all over the world?

Nordic, I concur with undead- there *is* a way to test ecstasy pills, and these test kits are pretty cheap. A family member of mine has one, and I've seen it in action. In true seriousness, I would recommend getting one for your daughter. Because MDMA/MDA is harmless and wonderful, but, because of drug prohibition, an incredibly high percentage of "ecstasy" pills are cut with other things, which are harmful to varying degrees- sometimes quite harmful. There is also a web site http://www.ecstasydata.org/, which lets you look up a certain pill design and find out exactly what's in it. If you get pure powder- called "molly"- it's a million times more likely that it's pure. I know if I had a kid who was getting into ecstasy I would be really, really frank about it with her. The other thing is to just not take a lot. There's no reason to be taking four or five pills. I absolutely guarantee that that young girl who tragically died at that festival in L.A. wasn't killed by MDMA... because that's impossible. If it was ecstasy at all that had to do with her death, she must have eaten a really number of very dirty pills- cut with meth, perhaps? I wish there were groups like "DanceSafe" around, which used to test pills for free for people at concerts.
wordspeak2
 
Posts: 1209
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Massachusetts
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Vets Get Ecstasy to Treat Their PTSD

Postby Joe Hillshoist » Sun Sep 05, 2010 6:07 pm

Nordic it might be worth it to get your step daughter to investigate drug testing kits. Not the sort parents use, but the sort ravers use. There are heaps so its worth sussing out which are the best, (and word of mouth or practice are about the only ways you or her will be able to do that.)

From what I remember eckie fatalities are never caused by MDMA, but in Australia a huge amount (well not many really compared to kids dying of preventable disease for example) were caused by GHB being sold as MDMA as ecstacy, (if not all of them).

If she is into it she won't stop cos one kid out of the hundreds of thousands who go to raves died from bad drugs. (Neither would I for that matter.) Its a pity they are all sponsored by corporates tho. At least if she knows how to manage the potential risks she should be ok. And it might give you guys a little peace of mind. Teaching children risk management skills is probably more important than we realise as adults.

And perhasps it'd help not to have to learn it all from mistakes, cos some people don't.

A quick search on drug testing mkits for safe dance parties or for ecstacy at dance parties might help.

(BTW Do they still call them raves? Haven't heard that for years. These days the kids round here call them Doofs.)
Joe Hillshoist
 
Posts: 10619
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Vets Get Ecstasy to Treat Their PTSD

Postby compared2what? » Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:42 pm

undead wrote:
hava1 wrote:unethical experimentation on same had been conducted by US research centers here in Israel on helpless unwitting patients of psychiatric institutes (one exposed by press, about 10 years ago, in Beer Sheva psychiatric hospital, a notorious guinea pig zone for the military). Apparently, the initial ecstasy trade by israel had been connected somehow to those experiments, but later took a life of its own :) and became a drug trafficking business associated with Israeli mafia.
Ecstasy harms the teeth, and I dont suppose anyone will assume the bills for that...
American research on PTSD, in Israel, is a huge market, and there seem to be no monitoring of the exportation of violations of human rights. My lame attempts, about 7 years ago to contact the monitoring group of ralph nader's org in DC, that exposed the nigerians trovan scandal, failed. Most of the lawyers that do that (very few...) are Jewish and the last thing they want is to deal with violations of human rights of Israelis, by the USA. the PTSD business interest in Israel (by the USA) can be investigated by that group who is going to investigate human experimentation by US military (the one PW is connected with). a lot of stuff...


What utter bullshit. Transparently fascist anti-semitic bullshit, to boot. Right, MDMA research is an Israeli conspiracy.

Apparently, the initial ecstasy trade by israel had been connected somehow to those experiments, but later took a life of its own :) and became a drug trafficking business associated with Israeli mafia.


Evidence? There is none. You are a liar.

Ecstasy harms the teeth


While MDMA may tax the body, this can be mitigated with dietary supplements (vitamin C and others) and is not a problem since you don't take MDMA day after day. The current "treatments" for PTSD are toxic psychiatrics that cause diabetes, tardive dyskinesia, and a myriad of other very real health problems.

I have met and spoke with the founder of MAPS personally. The results of the MDMA trials thus far have been 100% successful with the only adverse events being experienced in the group receiving a placebo. The relevant variable is the degree to which the patients are healed. The only reason this research is being allowed to go through is the overwhelming benefit to people with an otherwise untreatable condition.


As far as I know, therapeutic MDMA usage doesn't pose a serious risk of dental harm. But I have to admit that I don't actually know. I've just never read of it if it does.

However: The definitive review of the literature on potential consequences of MDMA use was done by MAPS in 2001, and has been updated periodically by them since then. And the most recent update I see on the finding I'd imagine most users would regard as worth knowing about is fundamentally unchanged since they did the first one. To wit:

Animal research studies consistently show that doing a lot of MDMA regularly is neurotoxic while ongoing, as well as the cause of a long-term and apparently irreversible loss of neurological and cognitive function in all the areas you'd expect to see with a serotonergically neurotoxic drug. Which is what MDMA is when it's a neurotoxin.

And fwiw, that's supported by retrospective studies on former human users. Although for the obvious reasons there's no way of really establishing cause-and-effect in a retrospective study.

Just to be 100 percent clear here: (a) That's so incredibly unlikely to have any implications for the use of MDMA in a therapeutic setting to treat PTSD that for all practically purposes, it doesn't have any; and (b) Although the MAPS review of the literature was definitive, the literature itself isn't. So those findings could well be way off-base in either direction. There are a passel of contradictory studies kinda-sorta indicating that it is for both, in fact.

Anyway. As I understand it, it's not conclusively known. But apparently, the status quo is still that it's a concern that can't be ruled out, since the most recent MAPS update on the issue that I could find (on studies through 2008) still stated:

Image

So. That's not, like, dire at all. But it's also not nothing. Individual brain chemistry varies. It's been a consistent finding in research studies. And it's been consistently found to be addressable only by co-administering SSRI antidepressants (which are many things, but neurotoxic isn't one, afaik) with the MDMA.

Which is totally logical since MDMA realeases a big burst of serotonin and SSRI's selectively inhibit its re-uptake. As their name suggests. But which also kind of totally defeats any conceivable purpose anybody could have for taking either. Needless to say.

The full PDF from which I swiped the conclusions above is here. But there's a much more thorough and readable review of potential MDMA neurotoxicity from 2001 by MAPS researcher Matthew Baggot here, if anyone cares. Although as the doc at the first link says, all of it may be useless anyway, due to a quirk in interspecies dose scaling.

Medicine is not as exact of a science as one might wish, imho.
User avatar
compared2what?
 
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:31 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Vets Get Ecstasy to Treat Their PTSD

Postby Jeff » Mon Sep 06, 2010 12:14 am

undead wrote:What utter bullshit. Transparently fascist anti-semitic bullshit, to boot. Right, MDMA research is an Israeli conspiracy.


This is uncivil and inappropriate. And it offends the gravity of the terms to casually fling "fascist" and "anti-Semitic" towards members here. Please don't do that again.
User avatar
Jeff
Site Admin
 
Posts: 11134
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2000 8:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Vets Get Ecstasy to Treat Their PTSD

Postby Project Willow » Mon Sep 06, 2010 12:46 am

wordspeak2 wrote:Yeah, people forced to take MDMA- that's quite a trip. So where'd you hear that one? Um, how about talking about people being forced to take *psychiatric drugs,* which happens constantly all over the world?


Ironically, from that usually unreliable source Wickedpedia on Project MKULTRA:
Other drugs

Other experiments involved hypnotic drugs such as temazepam (used under code name MKSEARCH), heroin, morphine, MDMA, mescaline, psilocybin, scopolamine, marijuana, alcohol, sodium pentothal,[30] and ergine (in Subproject 22).


I have a list somewhere in my MC files naming over 200 drugs. I was given LSD when I was 4. Doesn't mean some of you kids can't have a nice trip when its voluntary, it's just some of us didn't volunteer, you dig?
User avatar
Project Willow
 
Posts: 4798
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Seattle
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: Vets Get Ecstasy to Treat Their PTSD

Postby wordspeak2 » Mon Sep 06, 2010 10:57 am

Project Willow... I'm sorry you were dosed with LSD when you were four. I can only imagine.
I can envision MK-Ultra white suits testing practically every drug on the planet on unwitting subjects, out of interest and experimentation, but it's impossible- laughable, really- to imagine a nefarious use for MDMA. It's an inherently positive thing. II mean, that's just purely what it is, light energy. It doesn't have the potential complication and intensity and mind-blowing capacity of LSD.

And, C2W, thanks for the links... I can certainly see how MDMA could have some neurotoxicity if taken at high and repeated dosages. I know that it doesn't cause problems, however, at appropriate doses. I think it's true for all psychedelic drugs that moderation is essential. You only need the recommended dose; you don't need four or five times that; in fact, that's rather stupid. MDMA is a milder one, so it can be used more often, but too much will flood your system. If you're paying attention at all, you'll notice that. If you're stupidly pouring as much of whatever pills into your body as you can- well, you might cause some damage... but surely not as much as binging on the the elephant-in-the-closet of evil drugs in our society- alcohol!
best,
wordspeak2
 
Posts: 1209
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Massachusetts
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Vets Get Ecstasy to Treat Their PTSD

Postby crikkett » Mon Sep 06, 2010 11:39 am

compared2what? wrote:As far as I know, therapeutic MDMA usage doesn't pose a serious risk of dental harm. But I have to admit that I don't actually know. I've just never read of it if it does.

Here you go.
Erowid is your friend.
http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/mdma/re ... ract.shtml

http://www.erowid.org/psychoactives/hea ... sion.shtml

http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/mdma/md ... over.shtml
crikkett
 
Posts: 2206
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:03 pm
Blog: View Blog (5)

Re: Vets Get Ecstasy to Treat Their PTSD

Postby compared2what? » Mon Sep 06, 2010 3:56 pm

crikkett wrote:
compared2what? wrote:As far as I know, therapeutic MDMA usage doesn't pose a serious risk of dental harm. But I have to admit that I don't actually know. I've just never read of it if it does.

Here you go.
Erowid is your friend.
http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/mdma/re ... ract.shtml

http://www.erowid.org/psychoactives/hea ... sion.shtml

http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/mdma/md ... over.shtml


Thanks, crikkett! I guess my friendship with Erowid is just a little too much based in our mutual interest in neuroscience for my own good. And I'll try not to forget it.

wordspeak2 wrote:And, C2W, thanks for the links... I can certainly see how MDMA could have some neurotoxicity if taken at high and repeated dosages. I know that it doesn't cause problems, however, at appropriate doses. I think it's true for all psychedelic drugs that moderation is essential. You only need the recommended dose; you don't need four or five times that; in fact, that's rather stupid. MDMA is a milder one, so it can be used more often, but too much will flood your system. If you're paying attention at all, you'll notice that. If you're stupidly pouring as much of whatever pills into your body as you can- well, you might cause some damage... but surely not as much as binging on the the elephant-in-the-closet of evil drugs in our society- alcohol!
best,


Or the snake in the grass, nicotine!

Which I kind of have to joke about, since I'm addicted to it, but which really isn't funny. Because, you know. Lethal and unbelievably addictive substances with no health benefits at all have few inherently amusing or humorous qualities. I mean, at least drinking in moderation is good for some people who are at risk for some kind of cardiovascular disease under some circumstances. Plus, while not worth risking your life over, I do have to admit that drinking more than moderately every now and again can be a lot of fun. When it's not the opposite.

But basically, I didn't mean to suggest otherwise on any point, and believe that I totally agree with you on all of them, with the possible exception of what is, in all likelihood, an insignificant and picayune semantic detail -- ie, while it may be stupid for people to use mind-altering substances excessively, they don't really do it primarily out of stupidity, by and large. But that would only be worth quibbling about if it was your main point. Which I don't think it is.

So....I'm gonna go with "Totally agreed." Final answer.
User avatar
compared2what?
 
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:31 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 171 guests