Craigslist faces new wave of political attacks

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Craigslist faces new wave of political attacks

Postby justdrew » Thu Sep 09, 2010 6:51 pm

yep, I've been on about this for awhile now, but it looks like folks are finally realizing what's going on...

This is what you get when you give into COWARDLY BULLIES like this fucking PIGS who campaign against this site, are they placated? hell no, they just re-double their efforts to destroy you. fucking worthless cowards each and every one, hiding behind their bullshitter's badges. Authoritarian ass-wipes who need to be run the hell out of their damn jobs.

yes, apparently "little people" like the average American being able to post something where others will see it is unacceptable to the scum that THINKS they run this hell hole of a country. They deserve one thing...
Image

Craigslist faces new wave of political attacks
by Declan McCullagh
source -> http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-20015916-38.html

A year ago, Craigslist founder Craig Newmark was busy touting e-government, promoting neighborhood social networks, and blogging about squirrel-proofing his bird feeder.

But now the 57-year-old entrepreneur is spending his days in more nerve-wracking pursuits: responding to attacks from ambitious attorneys general, legal threats from antiprostitution advocacy groups that sometimes seem to be actually anti-Craigslist, and critical articles written by journalists employed by the same newspapers that his company is helping to slowly eviscerate.

Image
Craig Newmark in February 2009.
(Credit: Stephen Shankland/CCNET)

And now, two sources have told CNET, a congressional committee has asked Newmark to testify at a hearing in Washington, D.C. on Wednesday afternoon on the topic of "domestic minor sex trafficking." About the only thing that might make matters worse, perhaps, would be President Obama himself joining the anti-Craigslist fray.

This political onslaught would present a formidable challenge even to companies like BP that have spent millions of dollars armoring themselves with lobbyists and accruing ex-congressmen on their payrolls. For a San Francisco-based company that continues to employ only around 30 people and has found itself the target of so much official obloquy, it could be an existential threat.

If there is any irony here, it's this: Craigslist has not changed significantly in the last year or so, and neither has the amount of legal or illegal activities in its "adult services" section (which was yanked a few days ago). Instead, a chain of events has turned Craigslist into an election-year target for hostile politicians and advocacy groups, aided by news coverage this summer that dubbed a now-deceased medical student the "Craigslist Killer."

Newmark himself was an unwitting catalyst. After being confronted by CNN's Amber Lyon this summer outside a technology conference in Washington, D.C., he offered awkward responses to her questions, which accused Craigslist of profiting from sex ads posted by underage girls. (That decision to charge for such ads, announced in May 2009, actually came in response to pressure from state attorneys general who believed that credit card payments would make the section less anonymous.)

"If Amber had done her homework, she would have known ambushing me with questions I am not qualified to answer, or even the right person to ask, would not get CNN's viewers the accurate information they deserve," Newmark wrote in a blog post echoed by CEO Jim Buckmaster. Neither responded to an interview request on Wednesday.

After the segment aired, Lyon's CNN.com biography was updated to boast of her "exclusive" interview that "left Newmark speechless."

If CNN's piece had appeared a year ago, or even early in 2010, it might have been quickly forgotten. But the political groundwork been laid this spring, after groups like the Rebecca Project and actress Demi Moore convened briefings on Capitol Hill and with Obama administration officials that featured pointed criticism of Craigslist's business practices. (Moore, who appeared topless as a stripper in a 1996 film, also stopped by the White House on that trip.)

"We were able to, in the middle of all that happening, meet with Attorney General (Eric) Holder on the overall issue of trafficking, and talked about specifically Craigslist," said Malika Saada Saar, executive director of the Rebecca Project for Human Rights in Washington, D.C. "All of those points of pressure led to Craig Newmark deciding to shut down the adult services section."

Saada Saar says her organization is exploring what legal methods to employ against Craigslist, including filing a lawsuit under existing statutes or pushing for a new federal law. "What is the legal handle if we have a class action lawsuit?" she said. "Unfortunately, the law has not caught up with the terrible reality of how the industry is now using our children. That really wasn't true 15 years ago, 10 years ago, the way it's true today."

Liability and the law
Then there's the option of persuading Congress to rewrite Section 230 of the 1996 Telecommunications Act, which says: "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider." Translated, that means Craigslist isn't generally liable for what its users do.

Craigslist censored

But the law that immunizes Craigslist from lawsuit also protects Facebook, Blogspot, Flickr, and innumerable other Web sites. It lets news organizations, including CNET publisher CBS Interactive, permit readers to post comments without prior approval by an editor. It's probably no exaggeration to say that one sentence--inserted as part of negotiations over antiporn legislation--gave birth to Web 2.0 and modern social networks.

"Any attempt to reopen section 230 will inevitably invite a flurry of other proposals of how to deputize online intermediaries to handle any concern or pet grievance," says Berin Szoka, a senior fellow at the free-market Progress and Freedom Foundation. "Just limiting it to adult services or prostitution is naive."

Andrea Powell, executive director of the FAIR Fund, is also weighing a class action lawsuit against Craigslist. "There are enough victims," Powell said. "We were thinking about this one day and reached out and it turns out other groups were pondering it. I had a conversation with one woman who was victimized by Craigslist. By our records, our financial records, they owe her $60,000."

It might seem odd to say that a girl forced into prostitution was victimized "by Craigslist," when the pimp and any customers who know she's underage are the actual criminals doing the victimizing. But the FAIR Fund is probably the most unabashedly anti-Craigslist group, featuring no fewer than nine links to critical articles about the online classified site on its home page.

"There's probably not going to be an amicable solution at this point," Powell said.

Powell wants to eliminate any Craigslist ads hinting at sex trafficking--for both "minors and young people," meaning some adults as well. Because it's impossible to know whether a Craigslist post hinting at sex for money contemplates a fully consensual transaction between adults, the only sure way to delete sex-trafficking ads is to delete all sex ads, wherever they appear on the site. That leaves millions of posts to review.

"It takes a lot of work," Powell said. "Ultimately I think it's their business' responsibility...Ultimately I think the responsibility falls on them."

Her group wasn't satisfied with Craigslist's decision earlier this week to remove its U.S.-based adult services sections, arguing that they remain available internationally. For a few days, the word "censored" appeared, but that was removed from each U.S. city page on Wednesday evening.

That might have been prompted by a letter (PDF) on Monday from Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, who asked Buckmaster and Newmark to confirm that the word "censored" does not imply that the section "may be reinstated." Blumenthal added: "I urge Craigslist to employ other means of verification and detection before prostitution ads become rampant in the personals section."

The attorney general's office said that, as of Wednesday evening, Craigslist had not responded to the letter.

Not all antitrafficking groups agree that Craigslist should be forced to monitor every post for potential sex trafficking.

Loren Wohlgemuth, a spokesman for Shared Hope International, which bills itself as "leading a worldwide effort to eradicate sexual slavery," isn't terribly enthusiastic about the idea. "In theory that's wonderful," he said. "But you're seeing hundreds of thousands of ads. That's almost, from a time perspective, impossible to filter through every single one...There's no feasible way to monitor and regulate online classifieds--they'll continue to be abused."

That may not stop Washington officialdom. Congressional hearings, of course, are hardly neutral forums convened to unearth the truth of a matter. Instead, they're designed to make committee chairman look good--in this case, it's Rep. Bobby Scott, a Virginia Democrat and head of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.

Which means any invitation to testify amounts to a no-win situation for Craigslist, whether it's accepted or rejected, as Yahoo co-founder Jerry Yang can attest from his own personal experience. (A spokesman for Scott said Wednesday that he could not immediately answer questions about Newmark's acceptance. Newmark did not respond to a request for comment.)

For his part, Newmark recently pointed out that even though the nation's eighth-most-popular Web site bears his name, his actual title remains customer service representative. Jim Buckmaster has been the chief executive for the last decade.

"Craigslist has a CEO," said Jim Harper, a policy analyst at the libertarian Cato Institute. "Inviting Craig Newmark puts spectacle ahead of substance. It's like inviting Tony the Tiger to a hearing on childhood nutrition."

Update 8:30 a.m. PT: Here's a link with the details on next week's hearing. Still no witness list.

Update 9:30 a.m. PT: I just got a call from a representative of Rep. Bobby Scott's subcommittee saying they haven't heard back from Craig Newmark and don't have a final witness list yet: "We've spoken to them. We have not gotten an answer from them. We'll see. They have been offered an opportunity. I imagine this will be a chance for them to explain their position... It's not just about Craigslist, but the Internet as well, and to the extent that the Internet facilitates prostitution and domestic minor sex trafficking. What can the various sites do?"
Last edited by justdrew on Thu Sep 09, 2010 7:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
By 1964 there were 1.5 million mobile phone users in the US
User avatar
justdrew
 
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: unknown
Blog: View Blog (11)

Re: Craigslist faces new wave of political attacks

Postby dqueue » Thu Sep 09, 2010 7:08 pm

Besides the Adult Services "controversy", he may be a target due to his shunning of a corporate takeover or two. Sully the name, hope he doesn't survive and pickup the pieces for pennies on the dollar.

I'm sorry, is my cynicism showing again?

A good interview with Craig Newmark...
Craig Newmark: We're trying to basically just make enough to pay the bills. We don't think we should try to make as much money as we could. Nothing pious about this, but how much money does a human need?

Bankrate: And that's why you turned down lucrative offers for the company?

Craig Newmark: We're not anti-commercial, we're not pious, it's just that ... I ascribe it to nerd values, that say, "Hey, if we're making a comfortable living, after that it's a lot more satisfying to change the world a little." And we get a lot of feedback that says we are changing the world just a little.

Bankrate: How?

Craig Newmark: The biggest way is that we've helped out millions of people with everyday stuff, like finding a job or a place to live.

Bankrate: So you've turned down opportunities that would have made you very wealthy?

Craig Newmark: Yes.
We discover ourselves to be characters in a novel, being both propelled by and victimized by various kinds of coincidental forces that shape our lives. ... It is as though you trapped the mind in the act of making reality. - Terence McKenna
User avatar
dqueue
 
Posts: 432
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 5:02 pm
Location: DC
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Craigslist faces new wave of political attacks

Postby justdrew » Thu Sep 09, 2010 7:20 pm

By 1964 there were 1.5 million mobile phone users in the US
User avatar
justdrew
 
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: unknown
Blog: View Blog (11)

Re: Craigslist faces new wave of political attacks

Postby 82_28 » Thu Sep 09, 2010 7:55 pm

Could it have a little something to do with these asshats, whom which I will never ever utilize a service of theirs as long as I live? (Though it is directed by David Fincher -- who I like.)

Plot Summary for
The Social Network (2010)


On a fall night in 2003, Harvard undergrad and computer programming genius Mark Zuckerberg sits down at his computer and heatedly begins working on a new idea. In a fury of blogging and programming, what begins in his dorm room soon becomes a global social network and a revolution in communication. A mere six years and 500 million friends later, Mark Zuckerberg is the youngest billionaire in history... but for this entrepreneur, success leads to both personal and legal complications.


http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1285016/plotsummary



Arguably, in terms of scale, anonymity and usefulness, craigslist is far and away the more safe, low-key, simple, underspoken web "app" there is and honestly, the story of Newmark is far more interesting and edifying than some Harvard jackass who became the world's "youngest billionaire". I don't want to be databased or cross-reference-able, I don't want things recommended to me, if I want to get a hold of someone or them to get a hold of me, I will email or other ancient avenues of communication. I've met many a good person doing business through craigslist, be it buying a VW camper, a stack of games, a free piano, an antiquated router I wanted to play around with with an old PC I had, a sofa. End of the day, I met real people, they let me into their houses or I have let them into my house. Some like to chat, some keep to themselves, but craigslist is truly a gem in and of DIY economy and community.

The .gov just doesn't like the fact that they have to do the legwork in order to investigate criminal activity that may or may not happen on CL. Much worse happens via FB and before that on myspace per day than probably an entire year on CL. I suppose the only thing I really don't like about CL and it is based solely on nostalgic reasons, is the death of the local printed page. My two favorite newspapers in cities I've lived in are now dead -- The Rocky Mountain News and the Seattle PI.
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
User avatar
82_28
 
Posts: 11194
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
Location: North of Queen Anne
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Craigslist faces new wave of political attacks

Postby 82_28 » Thu Sep 09, 2010 8:08 pm

One reason I don't facebook, is that I don't want a picture of me on the Internet that I didn't put there myself. I don't want people to know where I went last Friday, who I was with etc. Some guy I know who is actually the only person I can think of who's feelings I have which border on hate, threw up a bunch of pics of me on his FB page last year. I told him to take them down. "Hey man, it's just facebook."

I said, I didn't give you my permission to use my name and use my picture to tell your stupid ass night-at-the-bar story. Nothing incriminating mind you and I never have jackshit to hide. But I come from an era where you maintained anonymity on the web at all costs. I used to hang out with a phreaker as a kid and all that shit rubbed off on me. You go by your online name and identity and in real life you let it hang out a bit. That's why meet-ups are so exhilarating. I've done it with this site and previously metafilter. I made friends, real friends that way.

That said, say, all you Seattle, PDX, Vancouver peeps, we should try and put a shindig together again. PM me if anyone's interested. :jumping:
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
User avatar
82_28
 
Posts: 11194
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
Location: North of Queen Anne
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Craigslist faces new wave of political attacks

Postby Krysos » Fri Sep 10, 2010 2:16 am

The best thing about craigslist, in terms of prostitution, is that it eliminated the middle man, or pimp, that tends to find his way into the business, and thus reduced the exploitation of young "ladies". The worst or best thing, depending on your point of view, is that it made it quite a bit easier for respectable, young, white, college type girls to prostitute themselves in anonymity, sans social repercussions.

Another good thing about craigslist whoring is that it made it significantly safer for the "ladies" to offer their services. The fact of the matter is, when you find a prostitute via craigslist there is an electronic trail, which presumably victimizer clients would be fully aware of, and as such would be less likely to rape or abuse the prostitutes offering their services, considering it would be much riskier than raping or killing a "lady" picked up off the street.

So ultimately, this ruling does nothing to combat prostitution, it merely makes it much less safe for prostitutes to provide their services. It also makes it much more difficult for law enforcement to monitor or prosecute those that would engage in this type of behavior.
Krysos
 

Re: Craigslist faces new wave of political attacks

Postby compared2what? » Fri Sep 10, 2010 6:19 am

f CNN's piece had appeared a year ago, or even early in 2010, it might have been quickly forgotten. But the political groundwork been laid this spring, after groups like the Rebecca Project and actress Demi Moore convened briefings on Capitol Hill and with Obama administration officials that featured pointed criticism of Craigslist's business practices. (Moore, who appeared topless as a stripper in a 1996 film, also stopped by the White House on that trip.)

"We were able to, in the middle of all that happening, meet with Attorney General (Eric) Holder on the overall issue of trafficking, and talked about specifically Craigslist," said Malika Saada Saar, executive director of the Rebecca Project for Human Rights in Washington, D.C. "All of those points of pressure led to Craig Newmark deciding to shut down the adult services section."

Saada Saar says her organization is exploring what legal methods to employ against Craigslist, including filing a lawsuit under existing statutes or pushing for a new federal law. "What is the legal handle if we have a class action lawsuit?" she said. "Unfortunately, the law has not caught up with the terrible reality of how the industry is now using our children. That really wasn't true 15 years ago, 10 years ago, the way it's true today."


I don't know how Malika Saada Saar fits into the picture, or even if she and Demi were acting jointly or separately, but she seems to have ridden a rocket straight to the galaxy of international clout pretty much as soon as she got through Brown and the Kennedy School of Government. And irrespective of whether they were a team effort or just lobbying on the same day, it would be very unlike the Kabbalah Centre not to be spiritually guiding such a devoted and high-profile student as Miss More while she strolled through the corridors of power. And influence. And wealth.

IOW: I feel like there's some missing data somewhere in there. But it's just a feeling, I haven't found anything that confirms it. Or even that gives it some form and substance.

It does seem to call for some kind of explanation, though.
User avatar
compared2what?
 
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:31 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Craigslist faces new wave of political attacks

Postby Pele'sDaughter » Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:44 am

http://www.citypages.com/2011-03-23/new ... k-science/

Women's Funding Network sex trafficking study is junk science
Schapiro Group data wasn't questioned by mainstream media

ATTORNEYS REPRESENTING CRAIGSLIST told Congress on September 15 that the ubiquitous web classifieds site was closing its adult section.

Under intense scrutiny from the government and crusading advocacy groups, as well as state attorneys general, owner Craig Newmark memorably applied the label "Censored" in his classifieds where adult advertising once appeared.

During the same September hearing of a subcommittee of the House Judiciary, members of Congress listened to vivid and chilling accounts regarding underage prostitution.

The congressmen heard testimony from half a dozen nonprofit executives and law enforcement officials. But the most alarming words of the day came from Deborah Richardson, the chief program officer of the Women's Funding Network. She told legislators that juvenile prostitution is exploding at an astronomical rate.

"An independent tracking study released today by the Women's Funding Network shows that over the past six months, the number of underage girls trafficked online has risen exponentially in three diverse states," Richardson claimed. "Michigan: a 39.2 percent increase; New York: a 20.7 percent increase; and Minnesota: a staggering 64.7 percent increase."

In the wake of this bombshell revelation, Richardson's disturbing figures found their way into some of the biggest newspapers in the country. USA Today, the Houston Chronicle, the Miami Herald, the Minneapolis Star Tribune, and the Detroit Free Press all repeated the dire statistics as gospel.

The successful assault on Craigslist was followed by a cross-country tour by Richardson and the Women's Funding Network.

None of the media that published Richardson's astonishing numbers bothered to examine the study at the heart of Richardson's claim. If they had, they would have found what we did after asking independent experts to examine the research: It's junk science.

After all, the numbers are all guesses.

The data are based merely on looking at photos on the Internet. There is no science.

Eric Grodsky, a sociologist at the University of Minnesota who teaches about proper research construction, says that the study is fundamentally flawed.

"The method's not clean," Grodsky says. "You couldn't get this kind of thing into a peer-reviewed journal. There are just too many unanswered questions about their methodology."

Ric Curtis, the chairman of the Anthropology Department at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York, led a Justice Department-funded study on juvenile prostitution in New York City in 2008. He's highly skeptical of the claims in the Women's Funding Network's study.

"I wouldn't trust those numbers," Curtis says. "This new study seems pretty bogus."

In fact, the group behind the study admits as much. It's now clear they used fake data to deceive the media and lie to Congress. And it was all done to score free publicity and a wealth of public funding.

"We pitch it the way we think you're going to read it and pick up on it," says Kaffie McCullough, the director of Atlanta-based anti-prostitution group A Future Not a Past. "If we give it to you with all the words and the stuff that is actually accurate—I mean, I've tried to do that with our PR firm, and they say, 'They won't read that much.'"



A FUTURE NOT a Past is a product of the Atlanta Women's Foundation, the Juvenile Justice Fund, and Harold and Kayrita Anderson's foundation. To measure the amount of juvenile prostitution in the state, the consortium hired the Schapiro Group, an Atlanta business-consulting operation.

The Schapiro Group members weren't academic researchers, and had no prior experience studying prostitution. In fact, the group was best known for research paid for by the American Chamber of Commerce Executives. The study found—surprise—that membership in the Chamber of Commerce improves a business's image.

The consultants came up with a novel, if not very scientific, method for tabulating juvenile prostitutes: They counted pictures of young-looking women on online classified sites.

"That's one of the first problems right there," Grodsky says. "These advertisers are in the business of making sales, and there's a market for young-looking women. Why would you trust that the photographs are accurate?"

In other words, the ads, like the covers of women's magazines, are relentlessly promoting fantasy. Anyone who has tried online dating understands the inherent trouble with trusting photographs.

Even if the person placing the advertisement is the one in the picture, there's no telling how old the photo is, says David Finkelhor, the director of the Crimes Against Children Research Center at the University of New Hampshire.

"How do you know when the pictures were taken?" Finkelhor asks. "It's not illegal for an 18-year-old who's selling sex to put up a picture of herself from when she was 16."

And if, for the sake of argument, the photos were an accurate portrayal, how do you train those viewing the photographs to guess the correct age?

In fact, you don't.

Before conducting its full study, the Schapiro Group tested the accuracy of its method in a sample of 100 observers. At one point, the 100 observers are described as a "random sample." Elsewhere, they are described as "balanced by race and gender."

These 100 adults were shown pictures of teenagers and young adults whose ages were known, and were asked to guess whether they were younger than 18.

(several more pages follow)
Don't believe anything they say.
And at the same time,
Don't believe that they say anything without a reason.
---Immanuel Kant
User avatar
Pele'sDaughter
 
Posts: 1917
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 11:45 am
Location: Texas
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Craigslist faces new wave of political attacks

Postby 8bitagent » Wed Mar 23, 2011 3:27 pm

Aw, it was only a matter of time before the powers that be decided CL had to go. They can't STAND the idea of a truly independent small venture that has become the google of services.

I think it was unwise of CL to have added an erotic services area in the first place, but almost everyone I know going back almost a decade has happily used craigslist for buying and selling stuff and or finding odd jobs. I cannot think of better resource online for that.

The idea of prostitution is odd to me. In this economy, $100-$300 is quite a lot, and someone is going to tell me 5-10 minutes with some most likely stinky "worker" is worth that? I mean I get why powerful Wallstreet guys do the blow and the $1500-$3000 hookers, it's part of the whole bling blang. But further adding to the cycle of women and young girls who most likely have already been through a lifetime of abuse emotionally and or physically and sexually....yeah I don't know.

Not against prostitution at all, just saying...I don't get it.

But I agree with the big picture, why does everything indie and good have to get swallowed up by corporate interests?
Having just watched "Gasland" last night, it seems the PTB leave no rock unturned in this quest
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12244
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Craigslist faces new wave of political attacks

Postby Maddy » Wed Mar 23, 2011 7:05 pm

Contrary to popular belief, Craig's List helped many women in the sex industry to keep themselves safe and off of the streets. While there are some who abuse it, as they abuse the women who work for them, a majority of women were able to connect with men in a less dangerous environment than simply jumping into someone's car and driving off.

8bitagent wrote:The idea of prostitution is odd to me. In this economy, $100-$300 is quite a lot, and someone is going to tell me 5-10 minutes with some most likely stinky "worker" is worth that? I mean I get why powerful Wallstreet guys do the blow and the $1500-$3000 hookers, it's part of the whole bling blang. But further adding to the cycle of women and young girls who most likely have already been through a lifetime of abuse emotionally and or physically and sexually....yeah I don't know.


Yeahhhhhhhh.... some of my best friends are professional sex workers, or ex-sex workers, and I'm relatively sure that the idea of "some stinky 'worker'" is pretty damned insulting to those in the sex-trade industry. Matter of fact, I'm an ex-sex worker who works with current sex workers helping street sex workers.

That type of insult is what keeps the sex industry illegal and thus dangerous to many women, especially those who are survival sex workers on the street.

Can I file this insult under the misogyny thread?

8bitagent wrote:Not against prostitution at all, just saying...I don't get it.


Clearly.
Be kind - it costs nothing. ~ Maddy ~
User avatar
Maddy
 
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:33 am
Location: The Borderlands
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Craigslist faces new wave of political attacks

Postby 8bitagent » Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:26 pm

Maddy wrote:Contrary to popular belief, Craig's List helped many women in the sex industry to keep themselves safe and off of the streets. While there are some who abuse it, as they abuse the women who work for them, a majority of women were able to connect with men in a less dangerous environment than simply jumping into someone's car and driving off.

8bitagent wrote:The idea of prostitution is odd to me. In this economy, $100-$300 is quite a lot, and someone is going to tell me 5-10 minutes with some most likely stinky "worker" is worth that? I mean I get why powerful Wallstreet guys do the blow and the $1500-$3000 hookers, it's part of the whole bling blang. But further adding to the cycle of women and young girls who most likely have already been through a lifetime of abuse emotionally and or physically and sexually....yeah I don't know.


Yeahhhhhhhh.... some of my best friends are professional sex workers, or ex-sex workers, and I'm relatively sure that the idea of "some stinky 'worker'" is pretty damned insulting to those in the sex-trade industry. Matter of fact, I'm an ex-sex worker who works with current sex workers helping street sex workers.

That type of insult is what keeps the sex industry illegal and thus dangerous to many women, especially those who are survival sex workers on the street.

Can I file this insult under the misogyny thread?

8bitagent wrote:Not against prostitution at all, just saying...I don't get it.


Clearly.


Is it not anti man to assume guys are easy pickens, willing to shell out hard earned money for an easy lay? I understand times are tough, hell I got barely $15 to my name. But am I totally wrong in assuming there is some sort of fractured emotional mindset going into a lot of girls going into this field? (Im not talking about the forced/coerced prostitution) I can't help but think of it from both a male mindset of financial viability but also the uncertainty explored in these avenues. I also can't help but imagine being the last customer of the day for a sex worker.

As far as misogyny, there's many things about the current American macho male dominion I take issue with(the love of "mixed martial arts", prowling at clubs and bars, encouraging near blackout drinking,
guys always looking for fights, etc)
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12244
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Craigslist faces new wave of political attacks

Postby Maddy » Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:39 pm

Remind me to come back and respond to this when I return. Clearly there is some miscommunication happening when someone can make such generalizations about a group of women and not see the issue with it.
Be kind - it costs nothing. ~ Maddy ~
User avatar
Maddy
 
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:33 am
Location: The Borderlands
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Craigslist faces new wave of political attacks

Postby 8bitagent » Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:49 pm

Maddy wrote:Remind me to come back and respond to this when I return. Clearly there is some miscommunication happening when someone can make such generalizations about a group of women and not see the issue with it.



I can understand how my off handed broadstroke comment is absolutely offensive and dismissive. When you type these things, you don't assume someone from an atypical field will be reading. I merely was writing that from the perspective of a male mindset and not understanding why guys would shell out money for something so intimate...though I understand many guys go home with strange women after a bar or club. It's just the unknown factor that seems unsettling.

If women hold such sexual power over guys(prostitution, pornography, getting guys to spend gobs of money on them), it's extremely tragic how women don't have more gravitas and sway in positions of power or overall job landscapes. Women's perceived sexual power doesn't seem to translate in other avenues. Instead society has become all too dulled to the horror show perpetrated against women worldwide. I definitely wish things weren't so screwed up, and I just can't help but feel bad for both parties in the sex industry world.
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12244
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Craigslist faces new wave of political attacks

Postby Maddy » Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:57 pm

You make me giggle. When I come back I'll respond.
Be kind - it costs nothing. ~ Maddy ~
User avatar
Maddy
 
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:33 am
Location: The Borderlands
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Craigslist faces new wave of political attacks

Postby 8bitagent » Wed Mar 23, 2011 11:20 pm

Maddy wrote:You make me giggle. When I come back I'll respond.


Well I feel bad, I didn't think my flippant crude remarks would really land anywhere. I guess I'm just frustrated with how culture is, seems like things are imbalanced with the place of things(again, this is coming from someone for whom $100-$200 is like several thousand dollars to the average person)
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12244
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 167 guests