Ahmadinejad outlines 911 LIHOP and MIHOP at the UN

[Gouda]

US walks out on Ahmadinejad's UN speech

UNITED NATIONS – The U.S. delegation walked out of the U.N. speech of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Thursday after he said some in the world have speculated that Americans were behind the Sept. 11 terror attacks, staged in an attempt to assure Israel's survival.

He did not explain the logic of that statement that was made as he attacked the U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Ahmadinejad has called for the destruction of Israel and is deeply at odds with the United States and European allies over its nuclear program and suspicions that it is designed to produce an atomic bomb. Iran says it is only working on technology for electricity generation.

The U.S. delegation left the hall after Ahmadinejad said there were three theories about the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks:

_That "powerful and complex terrorist group" penetrated U.S. intelligence and defenses.

_"That some segments within the U.S. government orchestrated the attack to reverse the declining American economy and its grips on the Middle East in order also to save the Zionist regime. The majority of the American people as well as other nations and politicians agree with this view."

The Americans stood and walked out without listening to the third theory, that the attack was the work of "a terrorist group but the American government supported and took advantage of the situation."

Mark Kornblau, spokesman of the U.S. Mission to the world body, issued a statement within moments of Ahmadinejad's attack.

"Rather than representing the aspirations and goodwill of the Iranian people," he said, "Mr. Ahmadinejad has yet again chosen to spout vile conspiracy theories and anti-Semitic slurs that are as abhorrent and delusional as they are predictable."

Ahmadinejad, who has in the past cast doubt over the U.S. version of the Sept. 11 attacks, called for establishment of an independent fact-finding U.N. body to probe the attacks and stop it from turning into another sacred issue where "expressing opinion about it won't be banned".

He said the U.S. used the attacks as a pretext to invade Afghanistan and Iraq that led to the killing of hundreds of thousands of people, saying the U.S. should have "designed a logical plan" to punish the perpetrators while not sheding so much blood.

Ahmadinejad boasted of the capture in February of Abdulmalik Rigi, the leader of an armed Sunni group whose insurgency in the southeast of Iran has destabilized the border region with Pakistan. He said authorities did not resort to violence, but captured the suspect after trailing his movements in an operation by Iranian secret agents. Rigi was later hanged.

The Iranian leader spoke of threats to burn the Quran by a small American church in Florida to mark the anniversary of the Sept. 11 terror attacks. Although that church backed down, several copycat burnings were posted on the Internet and broadcast in the Muslim world.

"Very recently the world witnessed the ugly and inhumane act of burning the holy Quran," Ahmadinejad said.

He briefly touch on the four sets of sanctions imposed on his country by the United Nations over Tehran's refusal stop enriching uranium and to prove Iran is not trying to build an atomic bomb.

Some members of the Security Council have "equated nuclear energy with nuclear bombs," Ahmadinejad said.

He accused the United States of building up its nuclear arsenal instead of dismantling it and reiterated his call for a nuclear-free world.

"The nuclear bomb is the worst inhumane weapon which must totally be eliminated. The NPT (Nonproliferation Treaty) prohibits its development and stockpiling and calls for nuclear disarmament," the Iranian president said.

Ahmadinejad hinted that Iran is ready for talks on its nuclear program provided they are based on "justice and respect", suggesting that the U.S. and its allies must stop pressuring Iran through sanctions before Tehran will sit at the negotiating table.

He again rejected the U.N. Security Council sanctions as "illegal," blaming the U.S. as the power behind the measures.

"Those who have used intimidation and sanctions in response to the clear logic of the Iranian nation are in real terms destroying the remaining credibility of the Security Council," Ahmadinejad said.

Ahmadinejad has in the past called the Security Council a "satanic tool" and has called its anti-Iran resolutions "not worth a cent."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100923/ap_ ... hmadinejad

[82_28]

Say,what is the percentage of US citizens who at least believe in the possibility of LIHOP/MIHOP? I've turned most everybody I know into LIHOPPERS/MIHOPPERS. All it takes, is a "You're fucking nuts if you literally think this was done by middle eastern hijackers." Then send them an MP3 of this or play it loud at a party.

[RocketMan]

Ahmadinejad, who has in the past cast doubt over the U.S. version of the Sept. 11 attacks, called for establishment of an independent fact-finding U.N. body to probe the attacks and stop it from turning into another sacred issue where "expressing opinion about it won't be banned".

It's very sad that Ahmadinejad thinks that the other "sacred issue" is the Holocaust whose historical verity should be debated. The guy is one poisoned well, I tell you.

[DrVolin]

Look at it this way. Ahmadinejad was one of the student leaders who made a deal with GHW to hand the election to Reagan by holding on to the hostages until inauguration day. In the plot of the last 30 years, he's in a position structurally equivalent to that of Bob Woodward. With this in mind, reanalyze his behaviour since becoming president.

[Montag]

I think this was a different speech, but Ahmadinejad experienced technical difficulties:

[surfaceskimmer]

Truth is rhizomatic.

[The Consul]

Look at it this way. Ahmadinejad was one of the student leaders who made a deal with GHW to hand the election to Reagan by holding on to the hostages until inauguration day. In the plot of the last 30 years, he's in a position structurally equivalent to that of Bob Woodward. With this in mind, reanalyze his behaviour since becoming president.

A comment worth expanding.

[Montag]

Look at it this way. Ahmadinejad was one of the student leaders who made a deal with GHW to hand the election to Reagan by holding on to the hostages until inauguration day. In the plot of the last 30 years, he's in a position structurally equivalent to that of Bob Woodward. With this in mind, reanalyze his behaviour since becoming president.

I had not thought about that in awhile... I was wondering if such a recognizable Holocaust denier and anti-Semitic figure is really someone we want talking about LIHOP/MIHOP? I think a lot of different things sometimes even that the "rogue" states are on the same team (with the U.S. and others).

It's interesting -- the claim about Ahmadinejad being one of the hostage takers... The CIA, of all people has denied that, but five of the former hostages dispute that (what the CIA says). Why would the CIA want to muddy the waters? More than likely if they did have some link to him I'd think.

[Nordic]

I was on a job earlier this week with a bunch of new guys and the subject came up, and all were mihop except one who was lihop. Granted we have had extreme unemployment in this field the past year or more so people have had a lot of time to research stuff. Thé ptb better get us all busy again soon or thé gig will be up.

[Nordic]

Look at it this way. Ahmadinejad was one of the student leaders who made a deal with GHW to hand the election to Reagan by holding on to the hostages until inauguration day. In the plot of the last 30 years, he's in a position structurally equivalent to that of Bob Woodward. With this in mind, reanalyze his behaviour since becoming president.

I had not thought about that in awhile... I was wondering if such a recognizable Holocaust denier and anti-Semitic figure is really someone we want talking about LIHOP/MIHOP? I think a lot of different things sometimes even that the "rogue" states are on the same team (with the U.S. and others).

It's interesting -- the claim about Ahmadinejad being one of the hostage takers... The CIA, of all people has denied that, but five of the former hostages dispute that (what the CIA says). Why would the CIA want to muddy the waters? More than likely if they did have some link to him I'd think.

The PTb will promote one of the official "enemies" saying this but none of the reasonable real people

[Gouda]

Via Cryptogon, who kindly furnished the full speech text:

*clip*

B) The Global Management and Ruling Structures

The League of Nations and, then, the United Nations were established with the promise to bring about peace, security and the realization of human rights, which in fact meant a global management.

One can analyze the current governance of the world by examining three events:

First, the event of the II September 2001 which has affected the whole world for almost a decade.

All of a sudden, the news of the attack on the twin towers was broadcast using numerous footages of the incident.

Almost all governments and known figures strongly condemned this incident.

But then a propaganda machine came into full force; it was implied that the whole world was exposed to a huge danger, namely terrorism, and that the only way to save the world would be to deploy forces into Afghanistan.

Eventually Afghanistan, and shortly thereafter Iraq were occupied.

Please take note:

It was said that some three thousands people were killed on the II September for which we are all very saddened. Yet, up until now, in Afghanistan and Iraq hundreds of thousands of people have been killed, millions wounded and displaced and the conflict is still going on and expanding.

In identifying those responsible for the attack, there were three viewpoints.

1- That a very powerful and complex terrorist group, able to successfully cross all layers of the American intelligence and security, carried out the attack. This is the main viewpoint advocated by American statesmen.

2- That some segments within the U.S. government orchestrated the attack to reverse the declining American economy and its grips on the Middle East in order also to save the Zionist regime.
The majority of the American people as well as other nations and politicians agree with this view.

3- It was carried out by a terrorist group but the American government supported and took advantage of the situation. Apparently, this viewpoint has fewer proponents.

The main evidence linking the incident was a few passports found in the huge volume of rubble and a video of an individual whose place of domicile was unknown but it was announced that he had been involved in oil deals with some American officials. It was also covered up and said that due to the explosion and fire no trace of the suicide attackers was found.

There remain, however, a few questions to be answered:

1- Would it not have been sensible that first a thorough investigation should have been conducted by independent groups to conclusively identify the elements involved in the attack and then map out a rational plan to take measures against them?

2- Assuming the viewpoint of the American government, is it rational to launch a classic war through widespread deployment of troops that led to the death of hundreds of thousands of people to counter a terrorist group?

3- Was it not possible to act the way Iran countered the Riggi terrorist group who killed and wounded 400 innocent people in Iran. In the Iranian operation no innocent person was hurt.

It is proposed that the United Nations set up an independent fact-finding group for the event of the II September so that in the future expressing views about it is not forbidden.

I wish to announce here that next year the Islamic Republic of Iran will host a conference to study terrorism and the means to confront it. I invite officials, scholars, thinkers, researchers and research institutes of all countries to attend this conference.

*clip*

http://www.irna.ir/ENNewsShow.aspx?NID=287100&SRCH=1

[Gouda]

Egad. And this from Marwan Bishara, Al Jazeera's "senior political analyst":

'9/11 denier'

Marwan Bishara, Al Jazeera's senior political analyst, said: "[Ahmadinejad's] attack on the traditional version of the 9/11 story was similar to his attack on the traditional version of the holocaust.

"So you can now say President Ahmadinejad is both a 9/11 denier and a Holocaust denier."

http://english.aljazeera.net/news/ameri ... 32707.html

I imagine that's going to catch on.

Please Denial 911 in case of emergency.

[82_28]

Yup. The US only simulates death and sadness. The people believe that simulations are real. Insofar as anything real must first be tested by simulation first. Or better yet, experienced as one would pop in a video game or visit a prototype full immersion say, Rainforest Cafe . We put ourselves in the shoes of those at the end of the gun via our movies and video games. And in many ways, and I have thought this for some time, Ahmadinejad, is a simulation. As we have become so focused on image, we now have to view all politicians as people who are avoiding the image trap. By doing so, they become a refocused, recursive image of what came before.

Ahmadinejad is just as much a US politician as Boenhner or how ever the fuck you spell either of their names is. Ahmadinejad, a name I will never commit the spelling of to memory I do not think, were it not for my PCs memory, is a necessary evil in order for the simulation of old grievances and injustices to be satisfactorily quelled so the next layer of totalitarian efficiency can be applied. Twitter only became so big once its "usefulness" was used in the now forgotten and ill understood uprising in Iran some months ago. Key here is "Twitter", not Iran. The next layer.

As I watched those good family men walk out of the UN speech, you must look at the phenotypic traits of the "good" Mr. Ahmadinejad. Swarthy, unkempt, unshaven, eyes close together, greasy looking thin head of hair, full of ideas that seek to topple the bullshit we all know good and well is a simulation. A new going theory of mine is that Iran was taken over whole "hog" in 1979. It's a set up. Easily. EASILY. None of the players have any doubt about this. It is an act.

Having eyes, see ye not? and having ears, hear ye not? and do ye not remember? Mark 8:18

And look at these Bible sites. What would a fucking christian say to a muslim who was burning a bible?

"Well, we got our bible right here on the internet you terrorist sand n****r. Just try and burn it."

Exactly.

Just as another human on the other side of the globe would go with it as. WHAT A BUNCH OF FUCKING PETTY IDIOTS. That's what they would say.

BUT. Maybe not. I know an Ethiopian man who is Christian and has lived in the USA for three and half years. He's all for the destruction of Islam. He's all for the wars this corporate juggernaut of evil and absurdity dishes up round the world. He feels safe now.

I told him I've lived in this country for 35 years and I've never felt less safe. I don't think he understood. I told him America was supposedly founded upon hatred for the government were it not controlled directly by the people. I don't think he understood that. He pinned it all on China. Not only do we have a long way to go, we basically have no where to go. It's just fucked. Nobody gets shit.

[Nordic]

Egad. And this from Marwan Bishara, Al Jazeera's "senior political analyst":

'9/11 denier'

Marwan Bishara, Al Jazeera's senior political analyst, said: "[Ahmadinejad's] attack on the traditional version of the 9/11 story was similar to his attack on the traditional version of the holocaust.

"So you can now say President Ahmadinejad is both a 9/11 denier and a Holocaust denier."

http://english.aljazeera.net/news/ameri ... 32707.html

I imagine that's going to catch on.

Please Denial 911 in case of emergency.

Mission accomplished. Makes you wonder.

[The Consul]

Well....you know...they admit that on 911 they were running a joint task force training excercise. How deep the training went. Feynman said that the most dangerous thing of our time was the rising likelihood of global mind control. Training excercise. Sit. Stand. Flinch. Osama. Fire. Explosion. Crying widows. Sadam. Heroic fireman with useless radio. Flapping flag. Evil Ahmadinejad. Evil. They showed over and over again the axel of evil then proclaimed the axis of evil. Sit. Watch. Obey. The training never ends. Flag. Ask no questions. Cowards. Undermine our troops. Come together. Wave that flag. We don't count the dead. They don't value life like we do. Holocaust/911 denier. Psychotic madman. Translation management. They can't have bomb, Israel has hunreds of them and it is never even discussed by any government official. Undying ally. Evil enemy. Oil. God. Oil. God. Freedom. Sit. Buy. Buy more. Stand. Sit. Oil. God. War. Good boy. Sit. Die.