MacCruiskeen wrote:nathan28 knows.
No, they've got us on a need-to-know basis in the psy-op office here, which shows how inefficient we really are, because while I have no clue WTF is going on, the Conspiracy Theorists' Doomsayers' Union has determined a mighty deal about all of this so far:
--It's naive to believe that it's possible for hackers to intercept documents on a poorly-secured network, or to have received documents from a source inside the gov't, unless they release documents we like, like David Shayler
--Nothing in even the scant amount of mat'l that has been released is of any relevance at all. Never mind that the US Sec'y of State ordered diplomatic staff to engage in outright espionage; never mind that the US Dep't of State has a dim, paranoid outlook on most of the world; never mind that the Pakistani gov't cooperated willingly with the US on drone campaigns, etc., etc. No one can actually learn something about what happens behind-the-scenes of embassies from this at all
--The backlash against Assange has been all for show. People call into Brian Lehrer's show on WNYC demanding assassination of journalists and background sources all the time. An ex-intel ops dude and a CFR dude voicing condemnation is, of course, really just for show, as well; Mike Huckabee calling for assassination is, likewise, also for show. B-roc already authorized assassinations, right? Now magazine editors are demanding them, for show, of course, because we already know imperial citizens are a bloodthirsty lot
--It's impossible that any institution could act on the international stage without being part of a state apparatus, like CIA-Disney-Mossad, or be part of the state's own extra-state apparatus, like a heavily-connected criminal organization
--It's impossible that the Wikileaks people don't have an agenda all of their own, because it's impossible to imagine international actors outside the aegis of the state (notable exceptions, of course, being disgustingly emotive Freemasons, Jews, Catholics or Mormons)
--This is all obviously the work of Israel, because none of the released US State dep't cables portray the US's most-favored client-state in a negative light
--This is all obviously the work of Israel, because Sunni Arab state leaders could have nothing but fondness for an ambitious non-Arab Shia state like Iran, so it's clearly part of a Bomb-Iran psyop, and on edit, it's obviously the work of Israel, because we could hardly imagine that State dep't employees would tell their superiors what they wanted to hear, like that some leaders in Arab client-states like Wahabist Saudi Arabia might be fine with the US bombing another state
--This can't be a real leak, because there's no receipts for nanothermite in them
See, I didn't know this until I took a trip into Conspiraville, but thanks for the help, everyone, it'll make it easier to report back to headquarters.
