Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
"Saad Hariri was on the brink of making a major concession as concerns the tribunal but occult forces prevented him from doing so," Walid Jumblatt, the Druze leader, told the AFP news agency without elaborating.
US considers military option against Hezbollah
The United States would potentially intervene militarily in Lebanon if Hezbollah resorts to violent measures when challenging the International Tribunal's indictment, due to be issued in the next few weeks, an Israeli news website claimed.
Israeli and American military officials told Tid Debkka, an Israeli website specialising in intelligence-related news, that the Obama administration have given the Pentagon orders to further strengthen the US military presence near the Lebanese coast.
The sources added that intensive reinforcements will be arriving to the Mediterranean Sea near Lebanon tomorrow. Among these, will be included the “USS Enterprise”, a US aircraft carrier, along with the Enterprise Carrier Strike Group which is composed of 5 ships and 6,000 troops.
“The US, by intensifying its presence in the Mediterranean Sea near Lebanon, is sending a clear message to Iran and Hezbollah that Washington will not hesitate to use force to defend the Lebanese government” the source added.
He also stated that the US, France, Saudi Arabia and Lebanon have agreed to a new set of measures to face the consequences of an International Tribunal indictment which might implicate senior members in Hezbollah of being involved in the assassination of ex-premier Rafiq Al-Hariri.
...the Party of God will be hard-pressed to overturn the political architecture in Beirut. To elect a friendly premier, Hezbollah will need the help of Druze chieftain Walid Jumblatt's bloc of 11 MPs. However, it is unlikely that Jumblatt -- a former staunch ally of Hariri's who has since forged his own path as an intermediary between Lebanon's two main political camps -- would participate in such a move. Hoping to maintain his renewed relations with Damascus but not burn bridges with Hariri, Jumblatt will likely wait to see how the two blocs position themselves over the next several days before involving himself in mediations.
With all the risks for everyone involved, Hezbollah has retained the upper hand, even as the assassination of the former Lebanese prime minister is under review at a UN tribunal. The demographics inside Lebanon are on the side of its Shia base. The internal distribution of power is also decidedly in its favor. Politically, Hezbollah managed to assert itself in both the previous ruling coalition and the current March 14 coalition by exercising its military superiority in the confrontations of 2008. Its leader, Hassan Nasrallah continues to be among the most popular in the Arab world—with his opponents looking weaker by the day through the continuous revelations coming out of WikiLeaks. Expected new releases about the 2006 Israel-Hezbollah conflict are likely to play into Hezbollah’s hands in the war over Arab public opinion as well.
Obama played a big role: Through his assistant secretary of state for Near East, Jeffrey Feltman, who has had years of experience in controlling [the] coalition in cooperation with Saudi Arabia and Israel. It is not a coincidence that Hariri did not get the stomach to reject the compromise deal until he arrived in the U.S.
The Saudi government is the sponsor of Hariri, and he, or his father, never acted in opposition to House of Saud. In fact, his father broke, privately but not publicly, with Syria only when a rift occurred between Syria and Saudi Arabia. The Saudi royal family is now undergoing changes, and conflicts over succession are raging, and the return of Prince Bandar indicates that the anti-Syrian princes are gaining the upper hand.
The opposition casts doubts on the entire Hariri tribunal and accuses the U.S. and Israel of manipulating the investigation and the impending indictment. Public opinion surveys in Lebanon indicate that the tribunal is losing support among the public, especially as the target of investigation has been switched a few times.
Hariri murder inquiry set to lay charges
Jason Koutsoukis
January 17, 2011
AN INTERNATIONAL tribunal investigating the assassination of the former Lebanese prime minister Rafik Hariri in 2005 is expected to submit a draft indictment for judicial review at The Hague today.
With several senior members of the Lebanese Shiite movement Hezbollah likely to face charges over the murder, the pre-trial judge, Daniel Fransen, may take up to 10 weeks to review the charges before arrest warrants can be issued.
Judge Fransen could also reject the charges, or request additional information from prosecutors.
A tribunal spokesman, Crispin Thorold, told Agence France-Presse: ''We will say it has been done the day it has been done; we won't announce when this is going to take place.''
The work of the special tribunal, which was established by the United Nations in 2007 to find those responsible for Mr Hariri's murder, last week prompted the collapse of Lebanon's government of national unity after Hezbollah and its allies withdrew from the cabinet in protest.
The Prime Minister, Saad Hariri, the son of Rafik Hariri, who enjoys support from the West and Saudi Arabia, wants the tribunal to carry on its work. But the Iranian-and Syrian-backed Hezbollah wants Lebanon to withdraw support for it.
The group has dismissed the tribunal as a US-Israeli plot, and has warned of violent repercussions should anyone inside Lebanon accuse its members of being involved in Mr Hariri's murder.
Last November Hezbollah's secretary-general, Hassan Nasrallah, said his movement would ''cut off the hand'' of anyone who tried to arrest any of its members for Mr Hariri's killing.
Talks between key Lebanese leaders are expected to begin today to try form a new government. While Mr Hariri's March 14 coalition enjoys a majority in Lebanon's 128-member parliament, any attempt to form a government without Hezbollah would probably lead to a return to the street violence similar to that of May 2008, when about 80 people were killed.
Alternatively, if Hezbollah tried to form a government without Mr Hariri, it risks alienating the wider Sunni population and could also provoke a sustained civil conflict.
One option being widely canvassed inside Lebanon would lead to Mr Hariri and Hezbollah agreeing on a ''neutral'' prime minister who could oversee procedures for Lebanon to withdraw its support for the tribunal.
Such a scenario would be seen as the ultimate compromise, which would secure Lebanon's stability without fatally undermining Mr Hariri's political base.
The caretaker Labour Minister, Boutros Harb, was quoted by Lebanese media reports yesterday, saying that the President, Michel Suleiman,was ''committed to conducting consultations with parliamentarians on naming a new prime minister in an atmosphere of calm'' and ''that would enhance accord in Lebanon''.
Galloway unedited: 'Special Tribunal for Lebanon' should have asked 'who benefited?'
BY DAVID J. CLIMENHAGA | JANUARY 16, 2011
We have been informed by the media that the "Special Tribunal for Lebanon" investigating the 2005 assassination of the Lebanese politician Rafik Hariri is expected to recommend indictments as early as tomorrow.
Much is made in the Canadian media of the fact that the tribunal, which by all accounts seems to have made up its mind long ago that the Lebanese political and paramilitary movement Hezbollah was responsible for the assassination, is a "UN-appointed" body, as if that guaranteed neutrality in the complicated and confusing Lebanese situation.
The thrust of the very limited Canadian news coverage on this subject seems to be designed to persuade uninformed and partially informed readers that Hezbollah was indeed responsible for the assassination, as is claimed regularly by Israeli and U.S. officials. For example, the November leak by tribunal insiders to the Canadian Broadcasting Corp. was meant to explicitly reinforce this perception.
The majority of Canadians who do read this coverage, one suspects, skim over it and assume it is of little relevance to Canada, perhaps feeling a vague sense of pride at the fact the tribunal's chief prosecutor is a Canadian.
Given what we are able to read, while the names on the indictments are to be kept a secret, it is reasonable to assume that if indictments proceed tomorrow as reported they will be directed at Hezbollah.
Moreover, it is not that hard based on a reading of the limited facts known about this situation to conclude that a key goal of the tribunal -- whose efforts are being encouraged by the Americans and Israelis with significant Canadian input -- is to assist in the neutralizing of Hezbollah's very effective fighting wing.
Indeed, according to such authorities on the region as Robert Fisk of the Independent newspaper, Hezbollah for all intents and purposes defeated the technologically superior and better armed Israeli armed forces during their 2006 invasion of Lebanon. Writing in Asia Times in October 2006, Alastair Crooke and Mark Perry argued, contrary to the story "retailed by White House and Israeli officials" of an Israeli military success, that "Hezbollah scored a decisive and complete victory in its war with Israel."
With several senior members of the Lebanese Shiite movement Hezbollah likely to face charges over the murder, the pre-trial judge, Daniel Fransen, may take up to 10 weeks to review the charges before arrest warrants can be issued.
Judge Fransen could also reject the charges, or request additional information from prosecutors.
A tribunal spokesman, Crispin Thorold, told Agence France-Presse: ''We will say it has been done the day it has been done; we won't announce when this is going to take place.''
The work of the special tribunal, which was established by the United Nations in 2007 to find those responsible for Mr Hariri's murder, last week prompted the collapse of Lebanon's government of national unity after Hezbollah and its allies withdrew from the cabinet in protest.
The Prime Minister, Saad Hariri, the son of Rafik Hariri, who enjoys support from the West and Saudi Arabia, wants the tribunal to carry on its work. But the Iranian-and Syrian-backed Hezbollah wants Lebanon to withdraw support for it.
The group has dismissed the tribunal as a US-Israeli plot, and has warned of violent repercussions should anyone inside Lebanon accuse its members of being involved in Mr Hariri's murder.
Last November Hezbollah's secretary-general, Hassan Nasrallah, said his movement would ''cut off the hand'' of anyone who tried to arrest any of its members for Mr Hariri's killing.
Talks between key Lebanese leaders are expected to begin today to try form a new government. While Mr Hariri's March 14 coalition enjoys a majority in Lebanon's 128-member parliament, any attempt to form a government without Hezbollah would probably lead to a return to the street violence similar to that of May 2008, when about 80 people were killed.
Alternatively, if Hezbollah tried to form a government without Mr Hariri, it risks alienating the wider Sunni population and could also provoke a sustained civil conflict.
One option being widely canvassed inside Lebanon would lead to Mr Hariri and Hezbollah agreeing on a ''neutral'' prime minister who could oversee procedures for Lebanon to withdraw its support for the tribunal.
Such a scenario would be seen as the ultimate compromise, which would secure Lebanon's stability without fatally undermining Mr Hariri's political base.
8:50: I will not reveal what Hariri’s side was asking from us. But one day, if someone else does reveal this, then the Lebanese will have to judge whether or not his demands were really in the national interest. Some of the things that they were requesting may have been in the national interest. But others were purely in the political interest of Hariri’s party.
AlicetheKurious wrote:Another important omission by Qifa Nabki is when Nasrallah firmly said, "We will never allow anybody to falsely smear us with the blood of Rafik al-Hariri, even in the form of an indictment. We will never allow it." Funny how so many translations and reports about the speech in certain media have seen fit to leave that out.
An Nahar daily on Monday quoted political and parliamentary sources as saying that efforts to postpone the binding consultations lasted way after midnight after Hizbullah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah announced that his party and its allies would not nominate Caretaker PM Saad Hariri for the premiership.
Other political sources told Pan-Arab daily Asharq al-Awsat that Suleiman would postpone his meetings with parliamentary blocs pending the announcement of the Syrian-Turkish-Qatari summit's results.
A March 14 official told the newspaper that Speaker Nabih Berri and Progressive Socialist Party leader Walid Jumblat suggested to Suleiman on Sunday night to postpone the consultations.
"Their suggestion came after a request from the Syrian leadership," the source said.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 161 guests