Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
Project Willow wrote:First of all, this type of screening isn't effective. They don't use these methods in Israel or other troubled places in the world where there are airports. Profiling and bomb-sniffing dogs are more effective. The scanners and pat-downs won't detect a bomb in someone's body cavity.
Secondly, good for you that you won't feel violated, but plenty of others have and do. The pat-downs involve TSA screeners placing their hands directly on the testicles, penis, labia and breasts of travelers. This kind of touching is illegal in most states. Have you seen the videos of mothers forced to hold their children while a TSA agent places his hands on the genitals of the child? Can you not consider that this activity is in direct contradiction to everything that same mother has told her child about how to protect himself against a molester? It's thoroughly disgusting, and again ineffective.
justdrew wrote:Project Willow wrote:First of all, this type of screening isn't effective. They don't use these methods in Israel or other troubled places in the world where there are airports. Profiling and bomb-sniffing dogs are more effective. The scanners and pat-downs won't detect a bomb in someone's body cavity.
Secondly, good for you that you won't feel violated, but plenty of others have and do. The pat-downs involve TSA screeners placing their hands directly on the testicles, penis, labia and breasts of travelers. This kind of touching is illegal in most states. Have you seen the videos of mothers forced to hold their children while a TSA agent places his hands on the genitals of the child? Can you not consider that this activity is in direct contradiction to everything that same mother has told her child about how to protect himself against a molester? It's thoroughly disgusting, and again ineffective.
oh yeah. good points. sorry, I'm not paying attention very well today. you're right. They should be forced to comply with international standards of practice, and if, as sounds likely, only the goons in the USA have come up with this as a necessary procedure, it should be abandoned.
I guess what pisses me off most about this is that it has to turn into a "win" for Texas republicans before anything reasonable can be done about this idiot policy. It's bullshit and I'd just about cut off my own arm to spite rick fucking perry.
Elite police force guards VRE from terrorist plots
Monday - 5/16/2011, 9:35am ET
VIPR team members patrol Union Station. (Courtesy of VRE)
WASHINGTON -- Following news that Osama bin Laden planned to target trains, a local rail provider asked immediately for additional, elite police presence to beef up security.
The Virginia Railway Express does not have its own dedicated police force, instead employing local and federal law enforcement partners. The nine local jurisdictions which own the rail system have increased police patrols on trains, platforms and parking facilities.
"We have 130 undercover officers who ride everyday who are the eyes and ears of the system," says spokesperson Mark Roeber. Up to five or six undercover officers are on any given Virginia Railway Express trains, including members of the Visual Intermodal Prevention and Response team, who are armed and trained specially.
"It's one of their elite divisions," Roeber says of VIPR, a part of the Transportation Security Administration. "Much like a SWAT team but much more specialized training."
Where and when the team shows up is completely random, he says. The unpredictability makes VRE a harder target for terrorists to pin down.
WTOP's Kathy Stewart contributed to this report.
http://www.wtop.com/?nid=120&sid=2384333
Statement of John S. Pistole, Administrator, Transportation Security Administration, before the House Committee on Homeland Security, Subcommittee on Transportation Security, "Authorizing the Transportation Security Administration for Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013"
Release Date: June 2, 2011
...
TSA also currently operates 25 VIPR teams across the transportation sector, and the FY 2012 budget request includes funding for 12 additional multi-modal VIPR teams. These teams consist of personnel with expertise in inspection, behavior detection, security screening, and law enforcement for random, unpredictable deployments throughout the transportation sector to deter potential terrorist acts. There have been more than 3,000 VIPR operations in the current fiscal year, 70 percent of which occurred in the surface transportation sector.
http://www.dhs.gov/ynews/testimony/test ... 25846.shtm
Homeland Security Conducts Inspections Along I–29
KPTH FOX 44 - May 18, 2011(JEFFERSON, SD) With thousands of trucks from across the nation traveling through our region, we are potentially at risk.
It's called a VIPR operation, and they happen at thousands of random locations throughout the year. On Wednesday, a team of local and federal law enforcement officers took action along Siouxland's main artery, I–29.
Their goal is do to be a visible deterrent for anyone considering terroristic activity, using any mode of transportation. Wednesday's target: truck traffic.
"Part of security is being unpredictable and random, so these teams can show up in various places such as mass transit at any time, so that's part of the security plan," says Carrie Harmon, TSA spokesperson.
Harmon also stressed that today's operation north of Sioux City near Jefferson, South Dakota is not in response to any specific threat.
http://www.kpth.com/story/14673691/home ... -along-i29
Blogger Bob--TSA's Internet mouthpiece (Q&A)
by Declan McCullagh / May 18, 2011 4:00 AM PDT
http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-20063825-281.html
...
Some other great info you would be privy to would have included the fact that the Amtrak Chief of Police, John O'Connor, kicked the TSA out of Amtrak properties after the TSA illegally searched and groped passengers AFTER they arrived at the Savannah, GA train station. This was courtesy of a VIPR operation, which to the best of my analysis, is where the TSA shows up at random public transit places (roads, trains, and subways) and kills the 4th amendment temporarily.
I understand for some scared Americans, that they are willing to give away any right and consider a 10 second to 5 minute violation two to four times a year something they would be willing to do, but that is a copout in our modern world and makes a mockery of the individual rights embodied in the US constitution which makes our country unique. Unfortunately, it is apparent that Cuba and the United States are moving in opposite directions on the "freedom meter" - and that is a truly sad state of affairs.
Read more: http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-20063 ... z1OFVR1iIo
elfismiles wrote:Amtrak Officials Back Schumer's Proposal For “No Ride List”
Bay Area Indymedia - May 10, 2011
As we have documented, VIPR teams are now already swarming America in the name of “security,” having expanded from airports, to train stations, highways and ...
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2011/0 ... 679366.php
Elite police force guards VRE from terrorist plots
Monday - 5/16/2011, 9:35am ET
VIPR team members patrol Union Station. (Courtesy of VRE)
[/i]
WASHINGTON -- Following news that Osama bin Laden planned to target trains, a local rail provider asked immediately for additional, elite police presence to beef up security.
The Virginia Railway Express does not have its own dedicated police force, instead employing local and federal law enforcement partners. The nine local jurisdictions which own the rail system have increased police patrols on trains, platforms and parking facilities.
"We have 130 undercover officers who ride everyday who are the eyes and ears of the system," says spokesperson Mark Roeber. Up to five or six undercover officers are on any given Virginia Railway Express trains, including members of the Visual Intermodal Prevention and Response team, who are armed and trained specially.
"It's one of their elite divisions," Roeber says of VIPR, a part of the Transportation Security Administration. "Much like a SWAT team but much more specialized training."
Where and when the team shows up is completely random, he says. The unpredictability makes VRE a harder target for terrorists to pin down.
WTOP's Kathy Stewart contributed to this report.
http://www.wtop.com/?nid=120&sid=2384333
Statement of John S. Pistole, Administrator, Transportation Security Administration, before the House Committee on Homeland Security, Subcommittee on Transportation Security, "Authorizing the Transportation Security Administration for Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013"
Release Date: June 2, 2011
...
TSA also currently operates 25 VIPR teams across the transportation sector, and the FY 2012 budget request includes funding for 12 additional multi-modal VIPR teams. These teams consist of personnel with expertise in inspection, behavior detection, security screening, and law enforcement for random, unpredictable deployments throughout the transportation sector to deter potential terrorist acts. There have been more than 3,000 VIPR operations in the current fiscal year, 70 percent of which occurred in the surface transportation sector.
http://www.dhs.gov/ynews/testimony/test ... 25846.shtm
hanshan wrote:
omg doom
...
Rally at the Texas Capitol Building to Support the 4th Amendment: Texas vs TSA 6-4-11
Rep David Simpson and Texans for Accountable Government founder John Bush
http://www.psiopradio.com/2011/06/texas-vs-tsa-6-4-11/
Video: Rally Against TSA "Intrusive Screening" by Justin Dehn
Keywords: Tea Party, Transportation Security Administration, David Simpson
http://www.texastribune.org/texas-polit ... screening/
Texans for Accountable Government and their coalition partners rallied on the front steps of the Texas Capitol Saturday, urging Gov. Rick Perry to support HB 1937. The bill, by state Rep. David Simpson, R-Longview, would restrict instrusive screening practices by security personnel.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFYTrdLMLTI
June 6, 2011 Texans rally at the state capitol in support of restricting "intrusive touching" by security personnel.
DIAMOND: TSA messes with Texas privates
DOJ threatens to ground planes over anti-groping bill
By Richard Diamond - The Washington Times
3:57 p.m., Wednesday, May 25, 2011
The Texas legislature needs to grow a backbone. A state that prides itself on its independence and the slogan “Don’t mess with Texas” ought not to be easily cowed as the upper chamber was Wednesday. When the time came for a vote to hold the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) accountable for its despicable airport-screening practices, it only took a scary letter from a Department of Justice bureaucrat to convince enough senators to hoist the white flag.
On May 13, the state House of Representatives had unanimously approved legislation applying sexual-harassment statutes to TSA agents who conducted intimate searches absent probable cause and without the backing of a specific federal law authorizing the procedure. Because the rogue federal agency has neither, Obama administration officials resorted this week to intimidation to thwart the bill as it came up in the state Senate.
On Tuesday, U.S. Attorney John E. Murphy dispatched a letter to Texas Speaker Joe Straus and Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst threatening to ground flights in the Lone Star State. “If HR 1937 were enacted, the federal government would likely seek an emergency stay of the statute,” Mr. Murphy wrote. “Unless or until such a stay were granted, TSA would likely be required to cancel any flight or series of flights for which it could not ensure the safety of passengers or crew.”
The bill’s primary sponsor, state Rep. David Simpson, a Republican, says that’s a bluff. “I don’t think it’s realistic at all,” he told The Washington Times. “I think it’s political cover.” Cutting off Texas would throw the entire air-transport system into chaos. Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport is the third busiest in the world and the primary hub for American Airlines. Last year, the airport handled nearly 1,800 flights per day. Houston’s three main airports served 135,000 passengers per day. Every domestic airline would be in court to challenge any move to cut off Texas just because TSA’s feelings were hurt.
This is the heart of the issue: Unelected bureaucrats demand carte blanche to mistreat the public in any way they choose. They don’t allow their judgment to be questioned. Mr. Simpson noted that the DOJ letter was dropped at the very last moment in the legislative process after all the votes had been lined up for final passage. “Why didn’t they come to my office over the last four months?” Mr. Simpson asked. “It’s pretty frustrating.”
At this point, with the clock running out on the Texas legislative session, extraordinary measures would be needed for the TSA bill to become law. Those steps ought to be taken to deliver a message to TSA and the Justice Department that they work for us, not the other way around.
Richard Diamond is a senior editor of The Washington Times and the former spokesman for the U.S. House Select Committee on Homeland Security.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... -privates/
Simpson's Crusade Against Government is a Lonely One
Texas Tribune - Brandi Grissom, Becca Aaronson - Jun 3, 2011
State Rep. David Simpson, R-Longview, sits at his desk on the House floor with an airplane drawing and the "Come and Take It" slogan visible on May 27, 2011. He bowed his head, tightly shut his eyes and pressed his ...
http://www.texastribune.org/texas-legis ... onely-one/
A G.O.P. Legislator Ardently Conservative, God-Fearing and Not a Team Player
Representative David Simpson, Republican of Longview, ruffled more than a few feathers during the Legislature's session.
By BECCA AARONSON and BRANDI GRISSOM
Published: June 2, 2011
He bowed his head, tightly shut his eyes and pressed his index finger to his lips, waiting and praying for the Texas Senate to approve one of his biggest priorities of his freshman legislative session: a measure that would apply criminal penalties to federal airport security agents who conduct intrusive pat downs.
The Texas TribuneExpanded coverage of Texas is produced by The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit news organization. To join the conversation about this article, go to texastribune.org.
It is just unreasonable for the federal government “to say, ‘We grope you or you don’t fly,’ ” the lawmaker, Representative David Simpson, Republican of Longview, said.
As with all of the bills filed by Mr. Simpson, a Tea Party conservative, this one failed. The Senate sponsor of the measure pulled it after the United States Justice Department threatened to shut down Texas’ airspace if it became law.
In the just-ended legislative session, Mr. Simpson made a name for himself — and not always a nice one — with his passionate push for the so-called “anti-groping” bill and his outspoken stance against bills he believed represented government intrusion on personal freedoms. Driven by his beliefs in liberty and God, he said he set out in his first legislative session to restrict government.
“One hundred eighty-one people don’t have the wisdom, don’t have the knowledge, to tell 25 million people how to live their lives,” he said. “We’re not a house of God.”
Several legislative colleagues said they appreciated Mr. Simpson’s sincerity and devotion, but they also found his sometimes-confrontational approach and independent style off-putting, even annoying. And in Longview, at least so far, the reviews of his legislative debut are mixed.
Mr. Simpson, a 49-year-old father of seven, takes the criticism in stride. Quoting the Gospel, he said, “If all men speak well of you, woe be unto you.” A Reformed Baptist, he graduated from high school in wealthy Highland Park. In 1992, he moved to the tiny East Texas town of Avinger, where he served as mayor from 1993 until 1998.
He runs a lumber company, founded a religious book publishing company and leads prayer at his church. A self-defined Jeffersonian constitutionalist, Mr. Simpson attributes his Republican primary victory in a “David and Goliath-like battle,” against Tommy Merritt, a seven-term incumbent, to his encyclopedic knowledge of the Constitution.
“Civil government really should be simply protecting life, liberty and property and getting out of the way,” Mr. Simpson said.
In his view, life is governed in four spheres (in order of importance): self, family, church, civil. It is a philosophy that governs his life. Unlike most other lawmakers, Mr. Simpson brought his wife, Susan, and their four youngest children with him to Austin.
Even before he was sworn in, Mr. Simpson made waves under the pink dome. He joined conservative Christian groups’ unsuccessful efforts to oust Speaker Joe Straus — the first Jewish leader of the chamber — who Mr. Simpson said was not conservative enough. He led a small group in a prayer vigil outside the Capitol that was later broadcast on “The Daily Show.” Holding his cowboy hat in hand, he prayed, “Father, we plead with you that you would give us a godly, humble leader of the Texas House.” He was one of 15 legislators who voted against Mr. Straus, a move that usually lands lawmakers in the political doghouse.
Mr. Simpson further alienated himself when he used parliamentary procedures to knock the bills of several senior legislators off a fast-track House calendar. Representative Senfronia Thompson, Democrat of Houston, wrote one of those measures, the contentious puppy mill bill meant to regulate animal breeders. Mr. Simpson said it was an unnecessary government expansion that would cost the state money and create a “dog Gestapo.”
His tactics drew the ire of lawmakers annoyed that he broke the unwritten rules of decorum. That was a lonely day, Mr. Simpson said, but he was resolved, comparing his fight to Sam Houston’s against secessionists.
“Providence will dictate whether I did the right thing today,” he said at the time.
Mr. Simpson also opposed a measure that would ban salvia, a legal plant that has hallucinogenic effects similar to marijuana. Government’s role, he said, is to punish wrongdoers, not ban God’s creations. “Things are not the problem,” he said.
Late in the session, Mr. Simpson drew a public tongue-lashing from Representative Lois Kolkhorst, Republican of Brenham. During debate over a proposed statewide ban on smoking, he suggested that the ban include cologne, which he said might also contain carcinogens. The move drew guffaws and jokes, but Ms. Kolkhorst took umbrage.
“This is not a laughing matter, and I want to tell you, I thought you were a pretty good member,” she said. “This is out of bounds.”
After explaining that he had not intended to mock the dangers of smoking, Mr. Simpson withdrew the proposal.
Despite the public confrontations, he said, “I think I showed that if you stand up for your principles, you can still agree to disagree and work together.”
Some legislators, though, said Mr. Simpson missed the importance of building relationships in the Legislature. Without support from other lawmakers, guiding any bill through the byzantine legislative process is impossible. Some of his Republican peers were confounded by Mr. Simpson’s surprise opposition to their bills and by his religious zeal.
Representative Patricia F. Harless, Republican of Spring, said that she appreciated Mr. Simpson’s integrity, but that it was not always best for his constituents. “He is about what he thinks is right,” Ms. Harless said, “and I think sometimes that sabotages the good things that could happen for his district.”
Freshman legislators typically focus on local bills that bring dollars to their districts and votes to their re-election campaigns. None of the 12 bills Mr. Simpson filed were local. He refused to sponsor a bill in the House — even voted against it — that was a priority in Longview, his home district: permission to increase the local hotel-motel tax to raise money for a civic center. After studying hotel prices and occupancy rates over the last year, Mr. Simpson said he decided, “This was not a good time to be raising taxes.”
And there was the anti-groping bill, which would have made it a misdemeanor offense for a federal security agent to “intentionally, knowingly or recklessly” touch someone in places that would be “offensive to a reasonable person.” Mr. Simpson said his goal was to uphold the Fourth Amendment, which prohibits unreasonable searches.
JoAnn Fleming, executive director of Grassroots America We the People, a conservative political action committee in Longview, said Mr. Simpson showed courage as a freshman legislator. He may have ruffled feathers, Ms. Fleming said, but he took a stand against government spending and intrusion, voting against a Republican-made budget that cut $15 billion, because it was not conservative enough.
“He didn’t sit down and shut up in a corner,” she said.
Not everyone in Longview was as pleased with Mr. Simpson’s performance. Some, Republicans and Democrats alike, even called his headline-making antics embarrassing.
Kelly Heitkamp, a lawyer in Longview and a Democrat, supported Mr. Simpson’s Republican predecessor. Mr. Simpson may mean well, she said, but he damaged the city’s credibility.
“This is not a far-right-wing community,” Ms. Heitkamp said, “and he is not representing this community as a whole.”
Despite his tumultuous start, Mr. Simpson plans to run for re-election. He said he learned a lot during his first session, and he hopes that with public outcry and support from lawmakers the anti-groping bill may be resurrected in the special session.
“Freedom brings people together,” he said, “and that’s why I’m here, really.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/03/us/03ttsimpson.html
Special session draws in protests
Rallies cross spectrum at Capitol (Video)
Updated: Saturday, 04 Jun 2011, 6:51 PM CDT
Published : Saturday, 04 Jun 2011, 6:44 PM CDT
* Dustin Blanchard
AUSTIN (KXAN) - Ralliers packed the Texas State Capitol Saturday, fighting for a wide spectrum of causes.
Teachers, students and parents gathered outside the Senate chambers in protest of SB 1811. The school funding formula passed the chamber Friday night.
The whole process does wear you down, and it's easy to get discouraged," said Carolyn Foot, a librarian at Westlake High, who has attended several rallies. "But I feel like it's worth it, because we need to let them know we're voting."
Christi Upton drove down from Keller, Texas to fight for her husband's job. It will likely be cut if the new budget formula passes. She said she was still hopeful.
"I hope that it will change. I'm not dead-set on the fact the House will pass this," she said.
Meanwhile, protesters outside the capitol were fighting to get a bill passed. Representative David Simpson's bill would make TSA pat downs a crime. The bill passed the House in the regular session, before the federal government threatened to halt flights out of the state if it was enacted. The bill stalled in the Senate.
"They're really wanting the governor to add this legislation, like he has others over the past few days to the call, so the dignity and freedom of travelers in Texas can be protected," Representative Simpson said.
Damion Lupo said he supports the bill because he's had to go through one of the pat downs.
"It's embarrassing. it's humiliating. I think a lot of people don't realize until it happens to them how ridiculous it is, but it's our rights just being squashed," said Lupo. "This is a step in that right direction, and letting those people who are supposed to represent us know we want them to stand up to the federal government."
At the same time, a protest was unfolding inside the Capitol rotunda for the right to dance.
"We've decided that we've gotta dance. And if dancing is illegal, then we're a little devastated," said Chanda Seymour.
The rally was in response to the United States Park Police arresting dancers in the Jefferson Memorial in May. A federal judge said dancing and protesting is off limits in the monument.
"If we don't fight for our rights. If we dont stand up for our rights. We lose them," said Seymour.
http://www.kxan.com/dpp/news/local/spec ... n-protests
Rally to stop pat downs by TSA at the State Capitol
by Belo Content KVUE
Posted on June 4, 2011 at 4:48 PM
Dozens rallying to stop "pat downs" at airport security lines rallied at the State Capitol today.
The group, "Texans for Accountable Government” wants a bill that would stop pat downs to be revisited during the special session.
Supporters believe those searches violate their constitutional rights.
“There's a group of people that are sick and tired of their families, children and themselves groped by the TSA,“ said group spokesperson Laura Pressley.
The State Senate blocked a bill that would ban pat downs last month.
Republicans withdrew their support, fearing a lawsuit from the federal government.
http://www.kvue.com/news/Rally-to-stop- ... 64918.html
Perry adds anti-groping bill to special session
Gov. Rick Perry in New York City - AP Photo/Bill Kostroun
Gov. Rick Perry announced he had added legislation that would make it illegal for TSA agents to engage in “intrusive touching” at airports security checkpoints without probable cause to the list of items for the legislature to consider during the special session.
The measure had previously failed to pass in the Texas Senate after the Justice Department wrote a scathing memo against the bill that threatened legal action against the state and the bill became enmeshed in Senate politics.
There are questions about what affect the legislation might have since airport security is a federal matter.
Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst, who was accused of lobbying against the bill in May said he was “pleased” by Perry’s decision.
“I’m very pleased that Governor Perry agreed to add this legislation to his Special Session call,” Dewhurst said. “Addressing unreasonable and unlawful searches of innocent travelers by some TSA employees is an issue that affects all Texans who use air travel, and it should not wait until next Session.”
Before the Senate took up the bill initially, the Justice Department sent a letter to state advising that passage of the bill would result in immediate legal action by the federal government and that it could result in airline flights to and from Texas being delayed or cancelled.
Opponents of the bill used it as ammunition to stall the bill. Patrick blamed Dewhurst for the unexpected opposition and claimed Dewhurst was openly lobbying Senators against the bill. Dewhurst said that Sen. Kirk Watson, D-Austin, had told him there were 12 Senators against the bill, enough to block it from coming up for consideration.
The day after, Patrick slammed Dewhurst.“Apparently, for political reasons… he came up with this elaborate political play to kill the bill without his fingerprints,” Patrick said, speaking to the drama over the anti-airport pat downs bill that failed yesterday.
When asked about how would affect his relationship with Dewhurst, he paused for a while before answering the question.
“I have to ask myself,” Patrick said, before trailing off again.
Shortly after making those comments, Patrick announced that he would explore entering the U.S. Senate race and challenge Dewhurst’s bid to replace retiring Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison.
The addition of the anti-TSA bill to the call comes just a couple of days after a Texas Republican activist confronted Perry about the issue while he was signing copies of his book ‘Fed-Up’ at the Republican Leadership Conference in New Orleans.
The Houston Chronicle’s Joe Holley reports that Perry told activist Wesley Strackbein that there simply weren’t the votes to pass the measure, an answer that Strackbein wasn’t pleased with.When he got to the head of the line and told the governor he was disappointed about his lack of support for the anti-groping bill, Perry said “Woo!” and then went on to say there wasn’t enough time in the special session to round up support for the bill. “They don’t have the votes on either side,” the governor said, trying to move Strackbein along. “That’s what I told them. I said, ‘Bring me in a multitude in votes.’”
Strackbein was polite with the governor but displeased. “This is a flimsy excuse, as the bills considered in the special session and the length of the session itself are the sole prerogative of Perry to determine,” he said later. “His comment, in effect, was: ‘I’m powerless to do what I’ve been empowered to do.’”
Conservative activists have held at least two rallies at the Capitol, protesting the Texas’ Senate’s inability to pass the legislation.
One of the rallies was led by talk show host Alex Jones, a controversial figure best known for propagating conspiracy theories about the September 11th terrorist attacks.
http://blog.chron.com/texaspolitics/201 ... l-session/
Posted by Nolan Hicks on June 20, 2011 at 7:15 pm
Categories: 82nd Legislature, Campaign 2012, Texas Senate
Tags: Anti-TSA bill, David Simpson, Sen. Dan PatrickNolan Hicks
Nolan Hicks is a reporter for the Houston Chronicle/San Antonio Express-News' Austin Bureau. He covers the Legislature, Texas politics and writes 'The First Word,' the bureau's morning newsletter. Previously, he was a reporter and copy editor at The Daily Texan, one of the most awarded college newspapers in the country. You can follow him on Twitter @ndhapple
TSA conducting security exercise
June 15, 2011
The Marietta Times
Today, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and several federal, state and local agencies will participate in a scheduled exercise designed to enhance security in the Ohio-West Virginia area. TSA has partnered with local law enforcement to conduct thousands of similar operations from coast to coast. This is a scheduled operation, not related to a specific threat.
The exercise will cover approximately 5,000 square miles throughout Ohio, Kentucky and West Virginia. The participating teams are composed of a variety of TSA assets including federal air marshals, canine teams, inspectors and bomb appraisal officers. They will be joined by state and local law enforcement officials to supplement existing resources, provide detection and response capabilities. The exercise will utilize multiple airborne assets, including Blackhawk helicopters and fixed wing aircraft as well as waterborne and surface teams.
“The exercise not only enhances security throughout the region; it gives TSA and our security partners the opportunity to work cooperatively,” said TSA Columbus Federal Security Director Donald Barker. “This work increases our preparedness to respond in case of an emergency.”
Federal partners participating with TSA in the operation include the Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Coast Guard, FBI and Federal Air Marshals.
State of Ohio participants include the Ohio National Guard, State Highway Patrol, Emergency Management Agency, Department of Natural Resources, Department of Public Safety, Department of Transportation, Office of Homeland Security, City of Columbus Fire Division bomb squad, Ohio Fusion Center, several sheriff’s offices and departments of emergency management.
West Virginia participants include the Department of Military Affairs & Public Safety, Division of Natural Resources, State Police, Office of Homeland Security, West Virginia National Guard, West Virginia Fusion Center, several sheriff’s offices and departments of emergency management.
In addition to federal, state, and local assets, several other non-government entities are participating in today’s operation.
http://www.mariettatimes.com/page/conte ... l?nav=5002
Surprise! TSA Is Searching Your Car, Subway, Ferry, Bus, AND Plane
— By Jen Phillips | Mon Jun. 20, 2011 3:15 PM PDT
Mother Jones dot com
Think you could avoid the TSA's body scanners and pat-downs by taking Amtrak? Think again. Even your daily commute isn't safe from TSA screenings. And because the TSA is working with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Border Patrol, you may have your immigration status examined along with your "junk".
As part of the TSA's request for FY 2012 funding, TSA Administrator John Pistole told Congress last week that the TSA conducts 8,000 unannounced security screenings every year. These screenings, conducted with local law enforcement agencies as well as immigration, can be as simple as checking out cargo at a busy seaport. But more and more, they seem to involve giving airport-style pat-downs and screenings of unsuspecting passengers at bus terminals, ferries, and even subways.
These surprise visits are part of the TSA's VIPR program: Visible Intermodal Prevention and Response. The VIPR program first started doing searches in 2007, and has grown since then. Currently, the TSA only has 25 VIPR teams doing these impromptu searches: in 2012, it wants to get 12 more.
The searches are in the name of passenger security, and the TSA says it wants to prevent incidents like the 2004 Madrid train bombings. But if the airports' TSA searches miss security risks like large knives, loaded guns, and explosives, there's certainly the chance that screenings at train stations would be similarly flawed.
Not to worry: security isn't the only goal of VIPR. A recent VIPR operation/screening at a Tampa Greyhound bus station was conducted with US Border Patrol and ICE. "What we're looking for is threats to national security as well as immigration law violators," said Steve McDonald from US Border Patrol. An ICE representative said that they were also looking for smuggling, and Gary Milano from Homeland Security said that although that was the first time the Tampa bus depot had been screened, VIPR would be back again sometime in the future and was using the element of surprise as a deterrent to "the bad guys."
Although one man at the Tampa screening said he felt "safer," VIPR operations are not without their naysayers. A VIPR screening at a Des Moines Greyhound station last week is alleged to have targeted Latinos. Another TSA/Border Patrol VIPR screening on a trolley in San Diego resulted in three teens being handcuffed and deported while on their way to school. Around 20 others were also deported, according to local news outlets.
The trolley is part of the San Diego Metropolitan Transit System. "We believe this is a flagrant violation of human rights, when we have a situation in which children are being separated from their families without the proper due process rights being afforded to them," said a spokesman for the girl's family. The three teens nabbed in the San Diego VIPR operation were deported to Tijuana, but later allowed to re-enter the United States on humanitarian visas.
More children, this time train passengers disembarking at Savannah, Georgia, were treated to questionable TSA treatment in February along with their families. While the passengers (who again, had just gotten OFF a train) were lifting their shirts and having bras handled during pat-downs, their luggage was sitting unattended on the train platform.
The TSA later admitted that the VIPR operation should have ended before the train entered the station, but told the public that the Savannah passengers didn't have to enter the screening area... even though an eye-witness says a TSA agent instructed them to go into the screening area to collect their luggage... the luggage that was actually waiting somewhere else.
VIPR operations are now even targeting freight trucks on highways. In addition to the random checks on public transit systems, it makes you wonder: can private vehicles be far behind? Will there be any mode of transportation beyond the reach of the TSA?
UPDATE: According to at least one news report out of Brownsville, Texas, TSA/VIPR has already conducted unannounced inspections of private passenger cars and trucks. Thanks for the tip, reader @jwindz.
UPDATE 2: Welcome, Drudge Report readers! If you liked this story, check out our story on how the TSA is scanning your face in an attempt to read your mind, our explainer on the safety of the new "porno-scanners," our report on the TSA missing a man's loaded handgun, our investigation of the people who are profiting from the new scanners, and Kevin Drum's anti-anti-TSA rant.
If You Liked This, You Might Also Like...
How Safe Are TSA's Porno Scanners?
UCSF researchers have some hard questions for White House science adviser John Holdren.
Texas Bill Would Ban TSA From Touching Your Junk
"Don't Mess With Texas" easily finds its analogue in "Don't Touch My Junk."
TSA Travel in 3 Bullet Points
Forget Your "Junk"—The TSA Wants to Feel Up Your Mind
The feds' new airport security plan: porno-scanning your face to read your mind.
Jen Phillips is the editorial coordinator at Mother Jones.
http://motherjones.com/mojo/2011/06/tsa ... ems-yearly
MICHIGAN: Lawmaker wants to criminalize ‘intrusive’ searches by airport screeners
By Charles Crumm
For the Daily Tribune
An Oakland County lawmaker is taking aim at the Transportation Security Administration and how its agents perform airport passenger security checks.
State Rep. Tom McMillin, R-Rochester Hills, wants to make it a misdemeanor for any TSA employee to “conduct an intrusive, personal search on citizens without reasonable cause.”
The legislation introduced Thursday by McMillin was referred to the state House Judiciary Committee.
McMillin referenced a recent incident at Detroit Metropolitan Airport “where a 29-year-old special needs passenger was subject to an allegedly intrusive search.”
“The federal government is not God,” McMillin said Friday. “It doesn’t get to decide what it can do to our citizens. This is one law that needs to be in place.”
McMillin’s bill says TSA screeners “shall not intentionally touch the clothed or unclothed breast, genitalia, buttocks or anus of that other individual except upon reasonable cause to believe that the individual may be concealing an item that is prohibited on that public property or on that mode of public transportation.”
Under McMillin’s bill, a first offense could draw a penalty of up to 93 days in jail, a $500 fine, or both.
McMillin said he patterned the bill after similar legislation in Texas. In Texas, the state House approved it but the state Senate rejected it after the U.S. Attorney’s Office wrote that such a law would conflict with federal law and criminalize searches required under federal regulations, and that TSA would likely be required to cancel flights if it couldn’t ensure the safety of passengers and crew.
The TSA was formed after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks in 2001 to “strengthen the security of the nation’s transportation systems while ensuring the freedom of movement for people and commerce,” the TSA website says.
But the federal agency has been criticized for its pat-down searches, chosen by travelers who are uncomfortable with TSA’s use of advanced imaging technology to screen passengers.
“My wife just traveled with our kids,” McMillin said. “We had to make the decision. We were nervous about them groping our children.
“I think there is an interest in the state in standing up for our citizens,” he said. “As we keep hearing about the problems throughout the nation, it’s a good safeguard.”
TSA screeners are most visible in commercial airports like Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport in Romulus and Bishop Airport in Flint.
At general aviation airports like Oakland County International Airport in Waterford Township, the TSA has no screeners, said J. David VanderVeen, Oakland County’s director of central services, which oversees the airport.
VanderVeen most recently was appointed by Gov. Rick Snyder to the Michigan Aeronautics Commission.
“I’m not sure the state Legislature can preempt federal rules,” VanderVeen said of McMillin’s legislation.
Most flights in and out of the local county airport are smaller private, corporate or charter flights.
“We’ve had some contacts with TSA, but they’re not stationed on the airport,” he said. “Our contact has been along the lines of security, the cameras and fences, and meeting the current federal standards.”
U.S. Customs and border patrol agents screen incoming international flights, he said.
“General aviation has an advantage in that the pilot knows the manifest, he knows everyone on the airplane,” VanderVeen said.
http://www.dailytribune.com/articles/20 ... 212127.txt
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 169 guests