Nuclear Meltdown Watch

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Nuclear Meltdown Watch

Postby seemslikeadream » Thu Jun 09, 2011 11:08 pm

Japanese village's nuclear reality sets in slowly
Image

By ERIC TALMADGE, Associated Press – 1 day ago

IITATE, Japan (AP) — Her village is irradiated, but Shigeko Nikaido says she isn't going anywhere.

She's got an 88-year-old mother to take care of, and a little business that means everything to her. Until someone comes and physically kicks her out, she says, she's staying put.

Nikaido is among about 1,500 people who still haven't left Iitate, a scenic village of 6,200 where the reality of Japan's nuclear disaster took a painfully long time to become clear. Though the rest of Japan — outside of the disaster zone itself — has largely returned to normal, Iitate is just now in the process of emptying out.

Residents of Iitate, nestled in mountains about 25 miles (40 kilometers) from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant, originally were told it was safe for them to stay. Then they were advised to stay indoors. In late April they were told to leave, but unlike people who lived closer to the plant, they can't be forced to go.

Plans were to have everyone out last week. Now, officials say it's largely up to residents to decide what to do.

"I'm not going to leave just because they tell me to," Nikaido said outside a small farmers' market.

Others are resigned to joining 80,000 other "nuclear refugees" but fear they will never come home.

"It's an order, so what can you do?" said vegetable farmer Mineo Sato, 55. "I've lived here all my life. I doubt if I'll ever come back."

To the casual visitor, Iitate appears normal.

The village, a blink-and-you've-missed-it cluster of farms and houses along a local highway, was virtually untouched by the March 11 quake. Because it is well inland, it was never threatened by the tsunami, which caused horrific devastation along the coastline.

The post office on its main street is still open, and so is the gas station. Dogs bark, birds chirp and the fields and hills are a verdant green — just like they are in the posters that boast Iitate is one of Japan's "100 Most Beautiful Villages."

But upon closer inspection there are signs that all is not right.

The elementary school playground is deserted. Outside the village hall, moving companies have set up stalls to solicit business. Trucks sit beside centuries-old farmhouses as whole neighborhoods pack up to leave.

Japanese media reported that Iitate's oldest resident, a 102-year-old man, was so distraught over the idea of leaving that he killed himself after being told of the evacuation plan. Town officials will not confirm his cause of death.

The village was outside the official danger zone, which extended out to just 12 miles (20 kilometers) from the plant, but it was in the path of a plume of radioactive isotopes the nuclear power station spewed into the air.

The first sign of trouble in Iitate came March 21, when the Health Ministry advised residents not to drink tap water because of elevated levels of iodine.

Then, on March 31, the International Atomic Energy Agency announced that radiation substantially higher than levels at which the U.N. nuclear agency would recommend evacuations had been recorded in Iitate.

The village's milk, produce and soil have all since tested at dangerously high levels of contamination.

The produce and milk exceeded government health regulations, though consuming them in small quantities is not seen as immediately health-threatening. The bigger concern, and the rationale for the evacuations, is the impact of being exposed to relatively high ambient radiation over an extended period of time.

On April 22, the central government expanded its evacuation zone to include Iitate and four other towns, adding about 10,000 people to the legions of nuclear refugees.

The town's leaders were given one month to prepare to get the villagers out, but the pace of the evacuation has been slower than expected.

By May 31 the village announced more than 4,700 residents — including thousands who left on their own — had relocated. About 20 percent of Iitate's pre-disaster population remained, but Iitate officials say they have no legal basis to punish anyone refusing to obey the order.

"We had hoped to have the evacuation finished by the end of May, but we can't threaten those who stay or force them to go," said village official Kazuki Imai. "It's now up to them, and they are here on their own responsibility."

The village office itself is scheduled to set up operations in a different town on June 22.

Many of the holdouts are farmers, for whom the evacuation has been especially life-changing. Because they can't take their animals with them, dairy and pig farmers have been forced to put their livestock up for auction, or put them down.

"We live off the soil. It's hard for us to simply leave our land," said Sato, the vegetable farmer, as he picked some flowers in his garden and prepared to leave. "I don't doubt that it's dangerous here, but it's hard to go."
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Nuclear Meltdown Watch

Postby StarmanSkye » Fri Jun 10, 2011 4:17 am

"We had hoped to have the evacuation finished by the end of May, but we can't threaten those who stay or force them to go," said village official Kazuki Imai. "It's now up to them, and they are here on their own responsibility."

****
This strikes me as the height of perversity -- Victims are 'responsible' for making the best of being squeezed by impossible choices, while 'responsible' is rarely (if ever) said in connection w/ Tepco, the Nuclear Industry, nuclear regulators or goverrnment officials who carelessly disregarded public safety -- with devestating consequences.
StarmanSkye
 
Posts: 2670
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:32 pm
Location: State of Jefferson
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Nuclear Meltdown Watch

Postby hanshan » Fri Jun 10, 2011 11:46 am

The Consul wrote:I watch that video and think, oh well, maybe the end of civilization is long over due.

I'd be tempted to change the pronunciation away from weener, whiner to Vyener.

Walking tall with a skippy pace with your head held high into the flames of industrial megadeath is a little harder to do when you have grandchildren who are just learning how to talk, a son who hasn't heard of the holocaust and doesnt want to know, and a dog recovering from surgery.



commiserate/define:...(verb/noun/adjective/gerund): empath

know the feelin'...

....
hanshan
 
Posts: 1673
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 5:04 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Nuclear Meltdown Watch

Postby Laodicean » Sat Jun 11, 2011 1:30 pm

Links @ source

A 35% Spike in Infant Mortality in Northwest Cities Since Meltdown

Is the Dramatic Increase in Baby Deaths in the US a Result of Fukushima Fallout?

By JANETTE D. SHERMAN, MD
and JOSEPH MANGANO

U.S. babies are dying at an increased rate. While the United States spends billions on medical care, as of 2006, the US ranked 28th in the world in infant mortality, more than twice that of the lowest ranked countries. (DHHS, CDC, National Center for Health Statistics. Health United States 2010, Table 20, p. 131, February 2011.)

The recent CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report indicates that eight cities in the northwest U.S. (Boise ID, Seattle WA, Portland OR, plus the northern California cities of Santa Cruz, Sacramento, San Francisco, San Jose, and Berkeley) reported the following data on deaths among those younger than one year of age:

4 weeks ending March 19, 2011 - 37 deaths (avg. 9.25 per week)
10 weeks ending May 28, 2011 - 125 deaths (avg.12.50 per week)

This amounts to an increase of 35% (the total for the entire U.S. rose about 2.3%), and is statistically significant. Of further significance is that those dates include the four weeks before and the ten weeks after the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant disaster. In 2001 the infant mortality was 6.834 per 1000 live births, increasing to 6.845 in 2007. All years from 2002 to 2007 were higher than the 2001 rate.

Spewing from the Fukushima reactor are radioactive isotopes including those of iodine (I-131), strontium (Sr-90) and cesium (Cs-134 and Cs-137) all of which are taken up in food and water. Iodine is concentrated in the thyroid, Sr-90 in bones and teeth and Cs-134 and Cs-137 in soft tissues, including the heart. The unborn and babies are more vulnerable because the cells are rapidly dividing and the delivered dose is proportionally larger than that delivered to an adult.

Data from Chernobyl, which exploded 25 years ago, clearly shows increased numbers of sick and weak newborns and increased numbers of deaths in the unborn and newborns, especially soon after the meltdown. These occurred in Europe as well as the former Soviet Union. Similar findings are also seen in wildlife living in areas with increased radioactive fallout levels.
(Chernobyl – Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment, Alexeiy V. Yablokov, Vasily B. Nesterenko, and Alexey V. Nesterenko. Consulting Editor: Janette D. Sherman-Nevinger. New York Academy of Sciences, 2009.)

Levels of radioisotopes were measured in children who had died in the Minsk area that had received Chernobyl fallout. The cardiac findings were the same as those seen in test animals that had been administered Cs-137. Bandashevsky, Y. I, Pathology of Incorporated Ionizing Radiation, Belarus Technical University, Minsk. 136 pp., 1999. For his pioneering work, Prof. Bandashevsky was arrested in 2001 and imprisoned for five years of an eight year sentence.

The national low-weight (under 2500 grams, or 5.5 lbs) rate has risen 23% from 1984 to 2006. Nearly 400,000 infants are born under 2500g each year in the U.S. Most of the increase in infant mortality is due specifically to infants born weighing less than 750 grams (I lb 10 1/2 oz). Multiple births commonly result in underweight babies, but most of the increase in births at less than 750 grams occurred among singletons and among mothers 20-34 years of age. (CDC, National Vital Statistics Report, 52 (12): 1-24, 2005.)

From an obstetrical point of view, women in the age bracket 20 to 34 are those most physically able to deliver a healthy child. So what has gone wrong? Clues to causation are often revealed when there is a change in incidence, a suspicious geographical distribution, and/or an increase in hazards known to adversely affect health and development.

The risk of having a baby with birth defects is estimated at three to four of every 100 babies born. As of 2005, the Institute of medicine estimated the cost of pre-term births in the US at more than $2.6 billion, or $51,600 for each infant.

Low birth weight babies, born too soon and too small, face a lifetime of health problems, including cerebral palsy, and behavioral and learning problems placing an enormous physical, emotional and economic burdens on society as a whole and on those caring for them. Death of a young child is devastating to a family.

As of June 5, 2011, The Japan Times reported that radiation in the No. 1 plant was measured at 4,000 milliseverts per hour. To put that in perspective, a worker would receive a maximal “permissible” dose in 4 minutes. In addition there are over 40,000 tons of radioactive water under that reactor with more radioactivity escaping into the air and sea. Fuel rods are believed to have melted and sunk to the bottom of reactors 1, 2, and 3.

Tepco, the corporate owner took more than two months to confirm the meltdowns and admitted lying about the levels of destruction and subsequent contamination, resulting in “Public Distrust.” Over 100,000 tons of radioactive waste are on the site.

Why should we care if there may be is a link between Fukushima and the death of children? Because we need to measure the actual levels of isotopes in the environment and in the bodies of people exposed to determine if the fallout is killing our most vulnerable. The research is not technically difficult – the political and economic barriers may be greater. Bandshevsky and others did it and confirmed the connection. The information is available in the Chernobyl book. (Previously cited.)

The biological findings of Chernobyl cannot be ignored: isotope incorporation will determine the future of all life on earth – animal, fish, bird, plant and human. It is crucial to know this information if we are to avoid further catastrophic damage.


http://www.counterpunch.org/sherman06102011.html

also - http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/06/ ... ay-35.html
User avatar
Laodicean
 
Posts: 3504
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:39 pm
Blog: View Blog (16)

Re: Nuclear Meltdown Watch

Postby JackRiddler » Sat Jun 11, 2011 2:52 pm


http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20110611/wl_ ... ar_protest

Japan anti-nuclear protesters rally after quake

By Antoni Slodkowski – 1 hr 38 mins ago

TOKYO (Reuters) – Thousands of anti-nuclear protesters marched in Japan on Saturday, three months after an earthquake and tsunami triggered the worst nuclear disaster in 25 years, urging the government to cut reliance on atomic power.

Three reactors went into meltdown after the earthquake hit the Fukushima Daiichi plant in northeastern Japan, forcing 80,000 residents to evacuate from its vicinity as engineers battled radiation leaks, hydrogen explosions and overheating fuel rods.

Company workers, students and parents with children on their shoulders rallied across Japan, venting their anger at the government's handling of the crisis, carrying flags bearing the words "No Nukes!" and "No More Fukushima."

"If they don't get the message now, what else has to happen before we stop using atomic energy which has proved so dangerous?" said kindergarten worker Yu Matsuda, 28.

She brought her children, aged 2 and 4, to protest at the headquarters of plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Corporation (Tepco).

"I want my children to play outside safely and swim in our sea without any worries," Matsuda said, listening to speeches by civil rights activists and people from tsunami-affected areas.

The protests are likely to add to public pressure that caused a shutdown of the Hamaoka nuclear plant in May and delays to the restart of reactors across the country after scheduled maintenance until tighter safety measures are put in place.

In France, where nuclear plants produce 75 percent of energy output, police said 1,150 people joined a protest in Paris. The anti-nuclear campaigners who organized the rally said 5,000 took part.

Japan is running 19 of 54 reactors in operation before the Fukushima disaster, raising the risk of serious power shortages into 2012. Many experts say economic risks are too high for Japan to pull the plug on all its reactors.

Analysts say industry is facing more power rationing and the need for energy imports levies a high price on the world's third-largest economy. Japan lacks the electricity generation capacity to substitute for the nuclear fleet.

"The nuclear lobby says the cost of green energy is too high. But I say the cost of cleaning up this mess and the possibility of more such accidents at the expense of our lives is much higher," said entrepreneur Yonosuke Sawada, 59.

"STOP INFIGHTING"

Protesters, shouting "Tepco liars!" and "Give us our friends back!" also criticized the government for its handling of the disaster, which left more than 23,000 dead or presumed dead and laid waste to a swathe of the northeast.

Prime Minister Naoto Kan, who on Saturday visited quake-affected areas, last week survived a no-confidence vote by saying he would step down when the worst of the crisis was over.

That fueled uncertainty about the smoothness and speed of recovery as there is still no agreement on how to pay for Japan's biggest reconstruction project since the years after World War Two.

"It's not a matter of what political party you support. Fukushima is still emitting radiation and politicians should concentrate on ending the crisis -- not infighting," said company worker Jun Miyakawa, 43, sporting a hat in the shape of an exploded reactor.

Japan's anti-nuclear movement, small and ignored by the public until the Fukushima crisis, has become more vocal, gathering increasing numbers of people to demonstrations.

But the number of protesters in Japan, a conservative society that values cooperation over outcries of public anger, are much smaller than in Germany, where as many as 200,000 pressed the government to overhaul its nuclear policies.


Das darf nicht wahr sein!*

Voters have generally supported the role of nuclear energy and even after the accident remained divided over whether all of the nuclear power plants should be closed, polls showed.

"People in Japan do have opinions, but are not used to expressing them in public like the Germans," said Reo Komazawa, 39. "I came here with my friends to play music and to show through music we are anti-nuke," he said as a colorful group of musicians and dancers marched in the crowd.


(Additional reporting by Lucien Libert and Elizabeth Pineau in Paris; Editing by Alex Richardson and Janet Lawrence)


* Okay I'll translate it: "I can't believe it!" (As in, I do believe it but it's shocking to me.) I saw Google Translate has this common idiom completely wrong, as: "This may not be true!" Au contraire: "It's true and it sucks!"

.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Nuclear Meltdown Watch

Postby hanshan » Sun Jun 12, 2011 5:31 am

Laodicean wrote:Links @ source

A 35% Spike in Infant Mortality in Northwest Cities Since Meltdown

Is the Dramatic Increase in Baby Deaths in the US a Result of Fukushima Fallout?

By JANETTE D. SHERMAN, MD
and JOSEPH MANGANO

U.S. babies are dying at an increased rate. While the United States spends billions on medical care, as of 2006, the US ranked 28th in the world in infant mortality, more than twice that of the lowest ranked countries. (DHHS, CDC, National Center for Health Statistics. Health United States 2010, Table 20, p. 131, February 2011.)

The recent CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report indicates that eight cities in the northwest U.S. (Boise ID, Seattle WA, Portland OR, plus the northern California cities of Santa Cruz, Sacramento, San Francisco, San Jose, and Berkeley) reported the following data on deaths among those younger than one year of age:

4 weeks ending March 19, 2011 - 37 deaths (avg. 9.25 per week)
10 weeks ending May 28, 2011 - 125 deaths (avg.12.50 per week)

This amounts to an increase of 35% (the total for the entire U.S. rose about 2.3%), and is statistically significant. Of further significance is that those dates include the four weeks before and the ten weeks after the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant disaster. In 2001 the infant mortality was 6.834 per 1000 live births, increasing to 6.845 in 2007. All years from 2002 to 2007 were higher than the 2001 rate.

Spewing from the Fukushima reactor are radioactive isotopes including those of iodine (I-131), strontium (Sr-90) and cesium (Cs-134 and Cs-137) all of which are taken up in food and water. Iodine is concentrated in the thyroid, Sr-90 in bones and teeth and Cs-134 and Cs-137 in soft tissues, including the heart. The unborn and babies are more vulnerable because the cells are rapidly dividing and the delivered dose is proportionally larger than that delivered to an adult.

Data from Chernobyl, which exploded 25 years ago, clearly shows increased numbers of sick and weak newborns and increased numbers of deaths in the unborn and newborns, especially soon after the meltdown. These occurred in Europe as well as the former Soviet Union. Similar findings are also seen in wildlife living in areas with increased radioactive fallout levels.
(Chernobyl – Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment, Alexeiy V. Yablokov, Vasily B. Nesterenko, and Alexey V. Nesterenko. Consulting Editor: Janette D. Sherman-Nevinger. New York Academy of Sciences, 2009.)

Levels of radioisotopes were measured in children who had died in the Minsk area that had received Chernobyl fallout. The cardiac findings were the same as those seen in test animals that had been administered Cs-137. Bandashevsky, Y. I, Pathology of Incorporated Ionizing Radiation, Belarus Technical University, Minsk. 136 pp., 1999. For his pioneering work, Prof. Bandashevsky was arrested in 2001 and imprisoned for five years of an eight year sentence.

The national low-weight (under 2500 grams, or 5.5 lbs) rate has risen 23% from 1984 to 2006. Nearly 400,000 infants are born under 2500g each year in the U.S. Most of the increase in infant mortality is due specifically to infants born weighing less than 750 grams (I lb 10 1/2 oz). Multiple births commonly result in underweight babies, but most of the increase in births at less than 750 grams occurred among singletons and among mothers 20-34 years of age. (CDC, National Vital Statistics Report, 52 (12): 1-24, 2005.)

From an obstetrical point of view, women in the age bracket 20 to 34 are those most physically able to deliver a healthy child. So what has gone wrong? Clues to causation are often revealed when there is a change in incidence, a suspicious geographical distribution, and/or an increase in hazards known to adversely affect health and development.

The risk of having a baby with birth defects is estimated at three to four of every 100 babies born. As of 2005, the Institute of medicine estimated the cost of pre-term births in the US at more than $2.6 billion, or $51,600 for each infant.

Low birth weight babies, born too soon and too small, face a lifetime of health problems, including cerebral palsy, and behavioral and learning problems placing an enormous physical, emotional and economic burdens on society as a whole and on those caring for them. Death of a young child is devastating to a family.

As of June 5, 2011, The Japan Times reported that radiation in the No. 1 plant was measured at 4,000 milliseverts per hour. To put that in perspective, a worker would receive a maximal “permissible” dose in 4 minutes. In addition there are over 40,000 tons of radioactive water under that reactor with more radioactivity escaping into the air and sea. Fuel rods are believed to have melted and sunk to the bottom of reactors 1, 2, and 3.

Tepco, the corporate owner took more than two months to confirm the meltdowns and admitted lying about the levels of destruction and subsequent contamination, resulting in “Public Distrust.” Over 100,000 tons of radioactive waste are on the site.

Why should we care if there may be is a link between Fukushima and the death of children? Because we need to measure the actual levels of isotopes in the environment and in the bodies of people exposed to determine if the fallout is killing our most vulnerable. The research is not technically difficult – the political and economic barriers may be greater. Bandshevsky and others did it and confirmed the connection. The information is available in the Chernobyl book. (Previously cited.)

The biological findings of Chernobyl cannot be ignored: isotope incorporation will determine the future of all life on earth – animal, fish, bird, plant and human. It is crucial to know this information if we are to avoid further catastrophic damage.


http://www.counterpunch.org/sherman06102011.html

also - http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/06/ ... ay-35.html


Outrageous...

...
JackRiddler:

* Okay I'll translate it: "I can't believe it!" (As in, I do believe it but it's shocking to me.) I saw Google Translate has this common idiom completely wrong, as: "This may not be true!" Au contraire: "It's true and it sucks!"


Tx for the clarity Jack,...

...
hanshan
 
Posts: 1673
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 5:04 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Nuclear Meltdown Watch

Postby JackRiddler » Sun Jun 12, 2011 12:54 pm

.

Surprise! Berlusconi media tries to sneak past a referendum to ban nuclear power in Italy. Since pro-nuke is unlikely to win, they're hoping for a low turnout (it requires 50 percent participation to be valid). Okay, we're not Italians, but did you know this was happening? I sure didn't.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/ju ... berlusconi

Italy's nuclear power referendum gets under way

Pro-nuclear Berlusconi urges Italians to say 'no' while trying to limit turnout in key ballot


John Hooper in Rome
guardian.co.uk, Sunday 12 June 2011 16.31 BST

Image
The 'yes' campaign makes a final push in St Mark's Square, Venice. Photograph: Matteo Nobili/AFP/Getty Images

Italians have begun voting in the world's first nuclear power referendum since Japan's Fukushima disaster, a vital ballot that represents a trial of strength between Italy's increasingly beleaguered prime minister, Silvio Berlusconi and his critics.

A majority yes vote could block his dream of generating a quarter of Italy's electricity needs with nuclear power. But the outcome of the ballot will only be valid if there is a turnout of at least 50% and Berlusconi's rightwing government has been doing all it can to limit participation.

Berlusconi, directly or indirectly, controls six of Italy's seven main television channels and news bulletins had scarcely mentioned the vote, despite nuclear power being an issue that stirs passionate feelings, until a few days ago when the country's media watchdog stepped in among Italians.

The prime minister has said he does not intend to vote and his government tried to scotch the ballot in a failed court appeal.

A turnout of more than 50% would be a second humiliating blow to the prime minister following defeat in last month's local elections in his home city of Milan.

After the courts threw out the government's appeal against the nuclear referendum, opposition groups mounted an energetic campaign to increase turnout.

Pierluigi Bersani, the leader of Italy's biggest opposition group the centre-left Democratic party, said they were "a step away" from reaching their goal.

Italy has not operated a nuclear plant since 1990. Three years earlier, a similar referendum was held in the wake of the Chernobyl disaster of 1986. Voters opted for the non-nuclear option in each of three ballots and Italy began phasing out its nuclear capacity, including an almost completed plant at Montalto di Castro, north of Rome.

But referendum decisions in Italy last only five years. Since 1992, Italian governments have, in theory, been free to embark on a new nuclear energy programme.

Italy is the only member of the G8 that does not produce nuclear power and supporters of nuclear energy argue that it is the key reason for the country's exceptionally high electricity bills. The high cost of electricity to both private consumers and business is also cited as a prime cause of Italy's low economic growth in recent years.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Nuclear Meltdown Watch

Postby Iamwhomiam » Sun Jun 12, 2011 6:31 pm

Laodicean, back on page 60 I posted a link to Yablokov's report on the lasting health impacts of Chernobyl mentioned in the Counterpunch article.

The report clearly states that there were by that time more than 170,000 North American deaths attributable to Chernobyl. Now we'll be unable to tell which radioactive poison is killing us, whether it's from Chernobyl or from Fukushima.

Let's not forget either that the fallout from atmospheric nuclear weapon testing in the 50s and 60s will be with us, claiming lives for another few tens of thousands of years.

Fukushima is the worst environmental disaster to occur in recorded history and it affects every single one of us and may kill many of us, though we are half a world away.

I really wish I could offer a few words of comfort, but then I would have to be dishonest, as there are none that to me don't feel empty or falsely reassuring.
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Nuclear Meltdown Watch

Postby alwyn » Mon Jun 13, 2011 12:40 am

This is one of the latest conspiracy theories floating around...not buying it; posted for reference only.

http://www.naturalnews.com/032692_Fukus ... quake.html

essentially says that there was no earthquake, it was a 'false flag' nuclear weapon.
question authority?
alwyn
 
Posts: 771
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 7:25 pm
Location: Laytonville
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Nuclear Meltdown Watch

Postby Nordic » Mon Jun 13, 2011 2:20 am

alwyn wrote:This is one of the latest conspiracy theories floating around...not buying it; posted for reference only.

http://www.naturalnews.com/032692_Fukus ... quake.html

essentially says that there was no earthquake, it was a 'false flag' nuclear weapon.



One of the stupidest fucking things I've ever seen. Stuff like this is deliberately thrown out there, I believe, to make "conspiracy theorists" look ridiculous.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Nuclear Meltdown Watch

Postby alwyn » Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:02 am

i wrote the guy who owns the site. called him an idiot, told him to do better research.
question authority?
alwyn
 
Posts: 771
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 7:25 pm
Location: Laytonville
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Nuclear Meltdown Watch

Postby hanshan » Mon Jun 13, 2011 9:01 am

Iamwhomiam wrote:Laodicean, back on page 60 I posted a link to Yablokov's report on the lasting health impacts of Chernobyl mentioned in the Counterpunch article.

The report clearly states that there were by that time more than 170,000 North American deaths attributable to Chernobyl. Now we'll be unable to tell which radioactive poison is killing us, whether it's from Chernobyl or from Fukushima.

Let's not forget either that the fallout from atmospheric nuclear weapon testing in the 50s and 60s will be with us, claiming lives for another few tens of thousands of years.


Fukushima is the worst environmental disaster to occur in recorded history and it affects every single one of us and may kill many of us, though we are half a world away.

I really wish I could offer a few words of comfort, but then I would have to be dishonest, as there are none that to me don't feel empty or falsely reassuring.



Yablokov's article is chilling reading. tx


...
hanshan
 
Posts: 1673
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 5:04 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Nuclear Meltdown Watch

Postby JackRiddler » Mon Jun 13, 2011 9:38 am

.

Looks like turnout is high in the Italian referendums!


http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.c ... e=business

Voter turnout strong in Italian referendums
San Francisco Chronicle - Colleen Barry - ‎19 minutes ago‎

(06-13) 05:05 PDT MILAN, (AP) --

Voters appear to have ignored Premier Silvio Berlusconi's example, turning out strong for a series of referendums that would block a revival of nuclear power, the privatization of the water supply and undo a law that offers the Italian leader a partial legal shield in criminal prosecutions.

Interior Minister Roberto Maroni said Monday that experts in the ministry project turnout in the Sunday-Monday referendums will be above the 51 percent needed to validate the vote. If confirmed, it would be the first time in Italy since 1995 that a referendum has been validated.

Passage of the referendums would be a blow to Premier Silvio Berlusconi, who has backed laws to reintroduce nuclear energy, privatize tap water and avoid facing criminal prosecution.

Berlusconi and many of his allies abstained from voting on the ballot questions that were direct challenges to both Berlusconi's policies and his legal tactics in four ongoing criminal cases in Milan.

Turnout Sunday night when the polls closed at 10 p.m. was 41 percent. Voting was continuing Monday.

"I only have the data from last evening, and there won't be other revelations until the polling stations close at 3 p.m. But projections by Interior Ministry experts using last night's data gives the impression that the quorum will be reached on all four referendums," said Maroni, who defied Berlusconi's example and voted.

Analysts anticipated that the Japan nuclear meltdown, following the March 11 quake and tsunami, would provide the greatest lure to the polls. Similarly, Italy's nuclear power plants were shut down by a 1987 referendum after the Chernobyl disaster.

Berlusconi's government tried futilely to block the nuclear referendum, abrogating its own law relaunching nuclear power to give the country time for reflection. However, the country's highest court said the referendum, backed by 750,000 signatures, could go ahead.

The government also passed a law mandating that the water supply be privatized by the end of 2011, arguing private funds were needed to improve aging delivery systems and cut waste. Roman Catholic clergy joined the campaign to revoke the law, saying that water was a human right that should not be subject to market rules.

Campaigners for two water referendums, which in contrast with the other ballot questions drafted by civil society and not political parties, argued that the deadline would deflate the amount of money city administrations could raise from the privatizations, and expressed concern that the private sector would be after short-term profits.

The referendum on whether top government officials could continue to enjoy a "legitimate impediment" from defending themselves in court due to official business was the most direct swipe at Berlusconi. Italy's highest court already weakened the law, unfreeezing criminal prosecutions in Milan earlier this year. The court said, however, that Berlusconi's lawyers could present official conflicts preventing Berlusconi's appearance on a hearing-by-hearing basis.

The strategy could create delays in ongoing cases, possibly pressing up against the statute of limitations, as Berlusconi's defense seek to schedule court appearances in four cases amid the premier's official duties.

Berlusconi, who for years failed to appear in court as is permitted for defendants in criminal cases in Italy, has changed his legal strategy, saying he wants to defend himself in court.

He currently has four criminal cases in Milan, including his trial on charges of having paid for sex with an underage teen and then using his influence to cover it up. That trial continues Tuesday, although Berlusconi is not expected to attend the technical hearing.

Berlusconi denies all wrongdoing in that, and other cases.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Nuclear Meltdown Watch

Postby Bruce Dazzling » Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:29 am

alwyn wrote:This is one of the latest conspiracy theories floating around...not buying it; posted for reference only.

http://www.naturalnews.com/032692_Fukus ... quake.html

essentially says that there was no earthquake, it was a 'false flag' nuclear weapon.


I'm NOT posting this story in support of the 'false flag' nuclear weapon-generated tsunami theory.

I'm simply pointing out that a search for a tsunami bomb has been officially acknowledged.

Tsunami bomb NZ's devastating war secret
New Zealand Herald
5:01 AM Saturday Sep 25, 1999

By Eugene Bingham

Top-secret wartime experiments were conducted off the coast of Auckland to perfect a tidal wave bomb, declassified files reveal.

An Auckland University professor seconded to the Army set off a series of underwater explosions triggering mini-tidal waves at Whangaparaoa in 1944 and 1945.

Professor Thomas Leech's work was considered so significant that United States defence chiefs said that if the project had been completed before the end of the war it could have played a role as effective as that of the atom bomb.

Details of the tsunami bomb, known as Project Seal, are contained in 53-year-old documents released by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade.

Papers stamped "top secret" show the US and British military were eager for Seal to be developed in the post-war years too. They even considered sending Professor Leech to Bikini Atoll to view the US nuclear tests and see if they had any application to his work.

He did not make the visit, although a member of the US board of assessors of atomic tests, Dr Karl Compton, was sent to New Zealand.

"Dr Compton is impressed with Professor Leech's deductions on the Seal project and is prepared to recommend to the Joint Chiefs of Staff that all technical data from the test relevant to the Seal project should be made available to the New Zealand Government for further study by Professor Leech," said a July 1946 letter from Washington to Wellington.

Professor Leech, who died in his native Australia in 1973, was the university's dean of engineering from 1940 to 1950.

News of his being awarded a CBE in 1947 for research on a weapon led to speculation in newspapers around the world about what was being developed.

Though high-ranking New Zealand and US officers spoke out in support of the research, no details of it were released because the work was on-going.

A former colleague of Professor Leech, Neil Kirton, told the Weekend Herald that the experiments involved laying a pattern of explosives underwater to create a tsunami.

Small-scale explosions were carried out in the Pacific and off Whangaparaoa, which at the time was controlled by the Army.

It is unclear what happened to Project Seal once the final report was forwarded to Wellington Defence Headquarters late in the 1940s.

The bomb was never tested on a full scale, and Mr Kirton doubts that Aucklanders would have noticed the trials.

"Whether it could ever be resurrected ... Under some circumstances I think it could be devastating."
"Arrogance is experiential and environmental in cause. Human experience can make and unmake arrogance. Ours is about to get unmade."

~ Joe Bageant R.I.P.

OWS Photo Essay

OWS Photo Essay - Part 2
User avatar
Bruce Dazzling
 
Posts: 2306
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 2:25 pm
Location: Yes
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Nuclear Meltdown Watch

Postby Peachtree Pam » Mon Jun 13, 2011 1:42 pm

Looks like Berlusconi has lost big-time!

http://www.rnw.nl/english/bulletin/berl ... dum-defeat



Berlusconi accepts humiliating referendum defeat
Published on 13 June 2011 - 5:12p

Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi recognised a humiliating defeat on Monday in opposition-backed referendums aimed at blocking nuclear power and abolishing a law intended to give him legal immunity.

"The high turnout in the referendums shows a will on the part of citizens to participate in decisions about our future that cannot be ignored," Berlusconi said, after official data showed 57 percent of voters had taken part.

Turnout was of crucial importance since the referendums required participation of more than 50 percent in order to have legal force.

"The will of Italians is clear on all the subjects of this consultation. The government and parliament must now respond fully," Berlusconi added.

Final results are due later on Monday but early data showed crushing votes of more than 90 percent against the government in the four referendum questions -- one on nuclear, one on the immunity law and two on water privatisation.

"Italians have finally woken up and decided to take their destiny into their hands," said a jubilant Margherita Sina, 25, one of hundreds partying in the streets of Rome as the results came in.

"This is huge. Italians have become more responsible," she said.

The setback for Berlusconi comes after the embattled premier's People of Freedom party lost mayoral elections in Milan and Naples last month -- a failure that already had many commentators predicting his demise.

The government had urged its supporters to stay away from the votes but switched to damage control mode as the first results came in, warning critics against making too much of the referendums.

Daniele Capezzone, a spokesman for the ruling party, said critics should not see "a meaning or a political effect" in the votes, while Defence Minister Ignazio La Russa said there would be "no effect on government policy".

But Umberto Bossi, the leader of Berlusconi's junior coalition partner, the Northern League, was more critical on Sunday as the high turnout became clear after a first day of voting.

"Berlusconi has lost the ability to communicate on television. That's the simple truth," he said, even as he dismissed the referendums as "useless".

Commentators said the success of the referendums will force a fundamental rethink within the ruling coalition.

"The referendums are communicating an alarming message for the entire centre-right," centrist daily Corriere della Sera said in an editorial.

"If what the polls are revealing is a loss of contact with the country, then the problem concerns the entire alliance," it said.

Business daily Il Sole 24 Ore said this was the "most arduous" challenge for Berlusconi since his election victory in 2008.

The nuclear vote will put a definitive stop to Berlusconi's aim of restarting Italy's atomic energy programme by 2014, plans that are already under a temporary moratorium following the Fukushima disaster in Japan.

"Following a decision being taken by the Italian people, Italy will probably have to say goodbye to the issue of nuclear power stations," Berlusconi said at a joint press conference with Israeli counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu.

"We will have to commit strongly to the renewable energy sector," he said even before the polls closed, anticipating the defeat.

Italy abandoned atomic energy with a referendum in 1987 after the Chernobyl disaster, but Berlusconi has made its reintroduction a major policy goal.

His government argues that it would slash electricity bills, reduce Italy's energy dependency and be better for the environment.

Daniel Cohn-Bendit, leader of the Greens in the European Parliament, has said that a vote against nuclear power in Italy "could open a serious phase of reflection in other member states" of the European Union.

A vote against Berlusconi's partial immunity law was also expected to give a strong signal of voter disenchantment over the 74-year-old prime minister's legal woes.

Berlusconi is a defendant in three trials involving allegations of bribery, fraud and paying for sex with a 17-year-old girl.

A Constitutional Court ruling has already curbed much of Berlusconi's legal protection but the "legitimate impediment" law also being voted on is still officially in place.

Under that law, the premier may decide not to appear at a court case he is due to attend if he decides he has important government business to attend to at that time.
Peachtree Pam
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 9:46 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 161 guests