IMF managing director arrested, accused of sexual attack

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: IMF managing director arrested, accused of sexual attack

Postby Peachtree Pam » Mon Jul 04, 2011 12:12 pm


Telegraph cartoon makes light of DSK rape claims


Posted by Laurie Penny - 04 July 2011 13:56

http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/lauri ... ch-justice


In this interpretation, as in most modern justice systems, it's always the 'bitch's' fault.

Today, as the testimony of the room attendant who says that the former chief of the IMF tried to rape her is trashed across the press, the Telegraph carries the following cartoon.

Image

This picture says more than words ever could about how some people understand power. In the image, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the "rutting chimpanzee," as a second alleged victim describes him, pants and drools with lust as he chases a chambermaid with 'presidency' scrawled across her skirts. Note that whilst 'Presidency' may be running away, she is looking back and pouting with a kitchy moue of sexual invitation reminiscent of a Carry On film - her cleavage heaves, her stocking-tops flash under frilly skirts. Presidency is a cheeky little tart. Presidency wants to be held down and fucked by world finance. Presidency is asking for it.

Strauss-Kahn's ambition for the Presidency of France is well-known, and since the charge of attempted rape was made, there have been many knowing jibes suggesting that what the former IMF chief may or may not have done to a poor, non-white domestic in a hotel bathroom is no different to what his organisation has been doing to poor, non-white nations for a number of years. Rarely, however, has the power rut of the business elite been phrased so explicitly, or with such glib acceptance, as rape: cartoon rape, pantomime rape, the sort of rape that swaggering mustachioed seducers visit upon squawking chamber maids in crass made-for-telly movies from the 1970s. You know - funny rape. Funny, funny rape.

It's age old, this image of a powerful men using and abusing the democratic settlement in the manner in which one might abuse a woman for which one has nothing but contempt. I am inescapably reminded of the words attributed to Strauss-Kahn's fellow Frenchman, Louis Antoine de Saint-Just: "Liberty is a bitch to be bedded on a mattress of corpses."

In this interpretation, as in most modern justice systems, it's always the 'bitch's' fault. 'Presidency,' in this picture, is all of us getting screwed by global finance and secretly liking it. Well, tell that to the striking workers of Europe. The slogan of this summer's Slut Walks - "we are all chambermaids" - has never seemed more prescient.
Peachtree Pam
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 9:46 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: IMF managing director arrested, accused of sexual attack

Postby vanlose kid » Mon Jul 04, 2011 12:15 pm

*

a bit of pre-emptive counterfactual reasoning:

- Banone is obviously a CIA/SG agent and part of a honeypot plan to destroy the great socialist DSK, IMF reformer and potential rival to Sarkozy.

– Banone is blond, was wearing jeans, and was obviously "sending signals".

– she's doing it for money and fame.

– she's a feminist out for revenge.

– she's a woman, when women say "no" they really mean "yes". as anyone knows, DSK's charm is irrisistable. he's french.

*
"Teach them to think. Work against the government." – Wittgenstein.
User avatar
vanlose kid
 
Posts: 3182
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 7:44 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: IMF managing director arrested, accused of sexual attack

Postby JackRiddler » Mon Jul 04, 2011 2:36 pm

.

Watching the Greek documentary Debitocracy, finally.

In the long course of this thread a lot of potentially odious ideas have been thrown around that may nevertheless instead turn out to be true. On the face of it I think we have seen the inevitable operation of financial power to destroy people in its way, and I don't mean the bankster DSK but the woman, who has been declared fair game.

But one thing is a certainty.

DSK has never been on a side that could be described as "us." He is not a socialist. He is not a secret reformer of the IMF. At best he is good at putting a rhetorical beard on a criminal organization, and that is not a good thing. He is the neoliberal bankster he has always appeared to be. The IMF has always been the beast of the imperialist powers who fund it. The IMF has always been the global loan shark, dispensing poverty and hunger and chaos to the countries on which its strong-arm attacks are visited. The IMF is never going to be a source of reform. The accession of a subordinate to DSK's managing director position changed absolutely nothing in the way the IMF has gone about putting the screws to Greece and preparing for the proposed sell-off of the beaches, ancient sites, islands and public companies. The disposal of one of the IMF's nominal leaders is good for Schadenfreude, but unfortunately not even a beginning for what really needs to be done, which would be the end of the IMF.

.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: IMF managing director arrested, accused of sexual attack

Postby Stephen Morgan » Mon Jul 04, 2011 3:45 pm

Peachtree Pam wrote:If this is what Vance’s constituents can expect from their elected District Attorney, the public should consider voting the guy out of office and electing someone who will put the safety of women higher up the ladder of prosecutorial priorities.


Not a legitimate prosecutorial priority, their role is to prosecute those who they have a realistic chance of convicting, no more or less.

Jurors said they voted to acquit in the “Rape Cop” case because there was no DNA evidence. Didn’t Vance’s prosecutors tell the jury the cops used condoms? If they did, maybe their failure was in selecting idiots who watch too much CSI to serve as jurors.


Yeah, stupid jurors, don't convict people on the strength of what I want to happen. Anyone'd think they'd taken a dispassionate look at the evidence and come to a different conclusion to what I've drawn from the media! Fuckers.

Never heard of this "rape cop" case, incidentally, but I don't generally abuse jurors for acquittals.

Either way, any prosecutor who just lost a big case because there was NO DNA, would be hard-pressed to criticize the strength of the evidence against DSK where there is PLENTY of DNA. In fact, not only was DSK’s semen found on the front of the victim’s shirt, there’s blood evidence, too, consistent with the victim’s description of a violent struggle.


DNA doesn't make a case for rape. You need to prove that sex took place, that DSK was involved, that there was no consent, all beyond a reasonable doubt. The lack of consent has, at best, ambiguous forensic support along with the testimony of the alleged victim, which is less valuable since the loss of credibility she's suffered.

I hate to rub in Vance’s face that his decision to criticize the prosecution of DSK was predictable, but in an article I wrote for Women’s eNews only days after DSK was arrested, I said the case would soon go “poof”. It wasn’t that I was suspicious of the victim’s credibility or thought she was some sort of agent for DSK’s political opponents (as if they wouldn’t think of a million better ways to bring the guy down), it was the wealth of the accused, the relative poverty of the victim, and the fact that before the ink was dry on DSK’s arrest papers, people on his behalf reportedly had already offered money to the victim’s family in Africa to make the case go away.


More slurs on the character of the defendant offered without evidence.

That a payoff was in the works so soon made the end game obvious before the game even started. In a criminal justice system where corruption is not tolerated, it wouldn’t matter. But the American legal system has long protected the wealthy over the poor, which is one of the reasons Kobe Bryant walked away from his criminal rape prosecution while so many poor men of his color sit in prison for committing less serious offenses. That’s right. Kobe Bryant, a black man, is partly responsible for why lots of black men are behind bars. Nice.


This is extremely poor. Even if he bought his freedom, that plays no part in the racist policies of the American justice system. They don't have a quota system, so that his escape from prison meant other innocents needed to be put in his place.

Recent developments in DSK’s case suggest the players took a page out of Bryant’s diabolical defense strategy. If the victim’s reputation is destroyed in the court of public opinion, and then she’s given money as a “settlement”, nobody will care that the criminal charges go away or that a “settlement” in a criminal case is illegal. Immoral victims who’ve behaved badly don’t deserve fair treatment in law and society.


Immoral victims get fair treatment. If you have a track record of bearing false witness, and you are an alleged victim of crime whose case rests entirely on your own credibility then you're less likely to attain a conviction, which is as it should be.

First we got the trial balloon about the case developing weaknesses because of the victim’s “credibility problems” – (on the eve of a three-day weekend, no surprise). If the public’s reaction is politically tolerable, step two will be the prosecutor’s motion to withdraw the charges “in the interest of justice”.


The case relies on the alleged victim's testimony to prove lack of consent. That testimony now lacks credibility. This makes a conviction unlikely. The interests of justice and the public would therefore be best served by dropping the charges.

1. The victim’s credibility problems in the DSK case have been described as so serious, prosecution may be impossible. But the victim in the “Rape Cop” case had equal if not more serous credibility issues. Why didn’t Cyrus Vance dismiss THOSE charges before trial?


Perhaps there was other evidence of lack of consent, such as serious vaginal tearing, or perhaps he learned his lesson from that case and that one should also have been dumped. Perhaps the credibility issues weren't so serious. Perhaps the DSK case won't be dropped.

2. Cyrus Vance released to the public a detailed description of the victim’s reported lies to immigration officials where she claimed she’d been raped and tortured in her native African country. She made those claims in support of her request for asylum and stated she was at risk for further persecution if she were returned to Guinea. Vance said these lies seriously undermine the victim’s credibility in the case against DSK even though lots of immigrants lie about abuses in countries where living conditions are inhumane not because they’re pathological liars but because they’re desperate for a better life in the U.S. These lies that Vance claims destroy the case against DSK were made eight years ago and were probably crafted by someone other than the victim – an attorney perhaps (ironically enough) who would have provided guidance to the victim about the things she should say that would enhance her chances for being granted asylum. If Vance’s policy is that lying about such things almost a decade ago is a moral failing of such magnitude it prevents his office from prosecuting the far more serious crime of rape, let the word go out to all sex predators in New York that they should choose immigrants as their victims and they should commit their crimes in Cyrus Vance’s jurisdiction.


Moral matters are outside the purview of the prosecutors' office. A previous false rape claim is a seriously damaging event in a rape case relying entirely on the victim not lying about being raped.

3. No matter what the victim lied about in the past, the prosecutor found NO reason to question the integrity of her claims as they relate directly to the sexual assaults. To the contrary, the forensic evidence proved the victim’s essential credibility on the only facts that really matter.


Irrelevant. A prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, a lack of proof that the alleged victim is lying doesn't constitute conclusive proof of guilt.

4. If Cyrus Vance thinks it’s appropriate to dismiss rape charges because of a victim’s prior false statements and other past “bad” behavior, he must also consider the past “bad” behavior and lies of DSK. For example, DSK has been repeatedly accused of sexually offensive behavior toward women and has admitted engaging in an inappropriate sexual relationship with an inferior employee. As for his past lies – just ask the people of Greece how many lies were produced by the IMF last year about the need to prevent collective bargaining in that country.


Evidence of past criminality is inadmissible for the very good reason that it in no way indicates guilt in the present case. Evidence of dishonesty, and strictly relevant dishonesty at that, is admissible as it effects the credibility of witness testimony. From a prosecutor's point of view his previous conduct is irrelevant, unless he's got a history of provable dishonesty and plans to testify.

5. There’s no dispute the incident occurred. Even the most reviled woman in the world has a chance at justice when there’s DNA proof that the incident occurred. The problem is, there’s a good chance the victim doesn’t want justice and that she’ll trade even the well being of all women for a big fat paycheck.


Assuming the victim is a victim it's a bit harsh to burden her with the "well being of all women" when she's probably struggling to deal with the personal consequences and the difficulty of prosecution. If she's not a real victim then the well being of all people is served by no prosecution taking place, unless of her should her deceit be prima facie provable.

The real question is whether Cyrus Vance has the moral fiber and political will to let a jury decide this case. DSK says it was consensual. The victim, and the forensic evidence, says it was forced. A jury can figure out what to make of the victim’s lies in her immigration papers just as they can correctly weigh the video of DSK’s unusually swift flight from the hotel after the incident – and the fact that he has an ugly history of similar sexually offensive behavior.


The prosecutor needs to believe a conviction is probable to prosecute, a judge needs to be convinced there is a case to answer, all before a jury is introduced. Evidence of his previous conduct won't be admissible and the evidence of his "swift flight" is that he left when he always intended to, went to a pre-arranged lunch appointment and then headed for his previously book flight out of the country, a picture of a man whose schedule was uninfluenced by events of the morn.

If Cyrus Vance has integrity, he will stay the course. If there’s money involved, he won’t. And the only thing that can force him to do the right thing is people rising up and demanding fair treatment of a woman who may not even want it.


If she doesn't want it a prosecution will be impossible. Also, it rather prejudges whether chavvy has integrity if you assume that he'll be straight off if there's money involved.

It isn’t the victim’s personal lawsuit – it’s the public’s case against a man who deserves to face the charges against him. If “we the people” do nothing in this case, as we did during and after the Kobe Bryant debacle, then we deserve a legal system that continues unabashedly to facilitate rather than prevent violence against all women.


The state prosecutes criminal cases as a breach of criminal law is judged to be a crime against the state. However the victim's testimony in a case to decide consent is vital. It's pretty much the whole case, the entire business resting on the credibility thereof, strengthened or weakened by performance under cross-examination and any forensic or other evidence to be introduced. If that doesn't provide enough to present a realistic prospect of conviction then dropping charges is the only possible option.
Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that all was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, and make it possible. -- Lawrence of Arabia
User avatar
Stephen Morgan
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:37 am
Location: England
Blog: View Blog (9)

Re: IMF managing director arrested, accused of sexual attack

Postby barracuda » Mon Jul 04, 2011 4:51 pm

Stephen Morgan wrote:DNA doesn't make a case for rape. You need to prove that sex took place, that DSK was involved, that there was no consent, all beyond a reasonable doubt. The lack of consent has, at best, ambiguous forensic support along with the testimony of the alleged victim, which is less valuable since the loss of credibility she's suffered.


Whoa there, Nellie. Early on DSK conceded that he had sex with the alleged victim, probably due to the virtual inaguability of the forensic data. Consent is realistically the only issue in this case.

The state prosecutes criminal cases as a breach of criminal law is judged to be a crime against the state. However the victim's testimony in a case to decide consent is vital. It's pretty much the whole case, the entire business resting on the credibility thereof, strengthened or weakened by performance under cross-examination and any forensic or other evidence to be introduced. If that doesn't provide enough to present a realistic prospect of conviction then dropping charges is the only possible option.


I agree with you, since you seem to be portraying the prosecution and conviction of rapists as a very difficult thing to do. I'm somewhat surprised, though, to hear you say this. Well done.
The most dangerous traps are the ones you set for yourself. - Phillip Marlowe
User avatar
barracuda
 
Posts: 12890
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: IMF managing director arrested, accused of sexual attack

Postby Stephen Morgan » Tue Jul 05, 2011 3:14 am

barracuda wrote:
Stephen Morgan wrote:DNA doesn't make a case for rape. You need to prove that sex took place, that DSK was involved, that there was no consent, all beyond a reasonable doubt. The lack of consent has, at best, ambiguous forensic support along with the testimony of the alleged victim, which is less valuable since the loss of credibility she's suffered.


Whoa there, Nellie. Early on DSK conceded that he had sex with the alleged victim, probably due to the virtual inaguability of the forensic data. Consent is realistically the only issue in this case.


I was meaning for cases in general.

The state prosecutes criminal cases as a breach of criminal law is judged to be a crime against the state. However the victim's testimony in a case to decide consent is vital. It's pretty much the whole case, the entire business resting on the credibility thereof, strengthened or weakened by performance under cross-examination and any forensic or other evidence to be introduced. If that doesn't provide enough to present a realistic prospect of conviction then dropping charges is the only possible option.


I agree with you, since you seem to be portraying the prosecution and conviction of rapists as a very difficult thing to do. I'm somewhat surprised, though, to hear you say this. Well done.


Well it should be, and if all the proper procedures are followed then it probably will be. Generally there's more coerced confessions and plea-bargains and rigged evidence and jury manipulation that you'll likely find in this case.
Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that all was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, and make it possible. -- Lawrence of Arabia
User avatar
Stephen Morgan
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:37 am
Location: England
Blog: View Blog (9)

Re: IMF managing director arrested, accused of sexual attack

Postby Peachtree Pam » Tue Jul 05, 2011 4:07 am

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me ... ull.column

Once again, it's the alleged victim on trial in rape case

Sandy Banks: Revelations that Dominique Strauss-Kahn's accuser lied about a gang-rape on her asylum papers could kill the case against him. But her past doesn't prove his innocence.

Sandy Banks

July 5, 2011


It's hard to know what to think about the drama unfolding in New York City, where the lead actors — an immigrant hotel maid and a powerful French politician — seem to have suddenly changed places.

When the show opened six weeks ago, the maid was a humble single mother, tragically wronged. Raised in a mud hut in a West African village, she had sought sanctuary in America after she was gang-raped and her husband killed, she said.

And Dominique Strauss-Kahn — a potential French presidential candidate — was a wealthy bully with a history of sexual faux pas, accused of attacking her while she cleaned his suite in a luxury hotel. In May, he was charged with attempted rape and sexual assault, and held on $6-million bond.

Then suddenly, on Friday, Strauss-Khan was set free. His accuser, it appears, is a liar and cheat.

She lied on her taxes and asylum application — claiming a child she didn't have and a gang rape in Guinea that never happened. Her bank records and a taped phone conversation with her jailed fiance suggest she consorts with criminals linked to drug-dealing operations.

Does that prove that she wasn't attacked and forced into sex by Strauss-Khan? No. But it does mean that his high-priced lawyers would tear her apart on the witness stand.

The prosecutors have DNA that shows that a sexual encounter occurred. Strauss-Khan says it was consensual. She was apparently overcome with desire at the sight of his paunchy, naked body. Am I the only one who finds that hard to believe?

But Strauss-Khan doesn't have to prove that he didn't try to rape her. Prosecutors have to prove that he did.

That means the "victim" is on trial in The People vs. Dominique Strauss-Khan. And her honor is our evidence.

Maybe not much has changed after all, despite 30 years of evolving sex crime laws. Lawyers can no longer badger a woman on the stand with questions about what kind of panties she wore or how many times she'd had sex before — questions that were routine in rape trials I covered years ago.

But the personal life of a rape victim is still considered fair game in too many cases, particularly when the issue is whether the sex act was by consent or involved force or threats of violence.

I understand the reluctance of prosecutors in the Strauss-Kahn case to go forward. Their office was stung in May by the unexpected acquittal in a high-profile case of two New York City cops accused of raping a drunken women after helping her into her apartment.

Jurors told the New York Times they didn't buy the cops' story that they had done nothing more than "snuggle" with the inebriated woman. But they didn't feel they could convict on the word of a woman with no DNA evidence and gaps in her liquor-clouded memories.

The Strauss-Kahn case presents a similar dilemma. How does a jury judge the veracity of a woman who would have to admit to years of lies and then attempt to explain away changes in her retelling of the alleged attack?

But then, Strauss-Kahn isn't squeaky clean, either. A novelist who says Strauss-Kahn tried to rape her 10 years ago announced this week that she intends to press for charges in her case. She was dissuaded from going public back then by his political allies — including her mother.

Strauss-Khan has a reputation in France as a womanizer. In America, we'd more likely consider his crude come-ons as the mark of a sexual harasser. But as one of his lawyers told our reporter, "He's a seducer, not an attacker."

Then give him a chance at seducing a jury. And let his discredited accuser — once deemed so convincing by prosecutors that she left hardened investigators in tears — have a chance to tell her story.

If prosecutors still believe that a sexual assault took place — and Monday's news stories make clear they do — then they ought to stop worrying about saving face and get their witness ready to appear in court.

This case is no longer just about what happened in that hotel room. It has become social and political theater, less entertaining but more important than the farcical drama of Anthony Weiner.

It's a public test, on an international stage, of the strengths and weaknesses of American justice when dealing with tricky sexual cases. You'd be hard-pressed to find better circumstances and players in a test case on a law school exam.

But this case requires more than abstract calculations about presumed credibility and trial outcome odds. Sex and scandal are at its center, but the public discussion is ranging far beyond that, to issues of power and greed and politics.

More than 1,000 readers weighed in on the New York Times' website Friday, after it broke the news of Strauss-Khan's release.

Some saw the focus on the maid's missteps as proof of an enduring double standard that tilts toward money and men.

"This is not about innocent until proven guilty," wrote Los Angeles reader Linda Fleming. "This is about men with power and money and bad reputations, against women without power and money with bad reputations."

But others, from around the world, saw the unraveling legal case as evidence of a "lynch mob mentality" of the American public and media, eager to sell a sensational tale by bringing down a powerful man.

And many worried that a derailed prosecution would make it harder to bring rape cases to trial and persuade juries to convict. As one Boston rape crisis counselor said: "If you are not the Virgin Mary, you take a huge risk in bringing a rape charge."

But that lesson, alas, is nothing new. Think back to the summer of 2003, to a hotel room in Colorado, where a powerful celebrity was accused of forcing a hotel worker into an unwanted sexual encounter.

The defendant then was Kobe Bryant, charged with the sexual assault of a 19-year-old desk clerk. By the time the trial date neared, investigative reports had transformed her from hard-working local girl to schizophrenic, suicidal trollop.

She spared prosecutors the choice the New York City district attorney now faces. She refused to testify, and the case was dropped. She sued Bryant instead, and a year later the civil case was settled with a public apology and cash payoff.

I wouldn't be surprised if the next act in this drama plays out that way, with a humble, impoverished immigrant maid and her justice-seeking lawyer.

Time to cue Gloria Allred.
Peachtree Pam
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 9:46 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: IMF managing director arrested, accused of sexual attack

Postby lupercal » Tue Jul 05, 2011 5:27 am

^ hold fast to your dreams ma chère. Meanwhile in the Post which may be just as fantastical:

DSK Investigator: Dismissal a 'certainty'
NY Post - July 5, 2011

Prosecutors will agree to drop the charges against Dominique Strauss-Kahn -- either on his next court date in two weeks or even sooner, according to a top investigator in the case who called the eventual dismissal "a certainty."

"We all know this case is not sustainable," the source told The Post exclusively yesterday.

"Her credibility is so bad now, we know we cannot sustain a case with her," the source said, referring to the Guinean hotel maid who accused Strauss-Kahn of trying to rape her in his plush Midtown hotel suite -- shocking charges that got the international banker bounced as head of the IMF and also derailed, at least for now, his bid to become president of France.

"She is not to be believed in anything that comes out of her mouth -- which is a shame, because now we may never know what happened in that hotel room," said the source, who is at the center of the investigation and would speak only on the condition of anonymity.

- snip -

Multiple investigators for the defense and prosecution have confirmed that they believe the maid was turning tricks at the hotel, and prosecution sources have even accused her of continuing to "entertain" male visitors while in a DA safehouse.

- snip -

For six weeks, the maid told investigators a credible and compelling story about her travails of rape and beatings in escaping Guinea's violent regime, and about her alleged re-victimization last month by Strauss-Kahn.

"One-hundred-percent consistent," one top investigator called her first month-and-a-half of statements. "Rock solid," another top investigator said.

Only eight days ago did the maid's story fall apart, according to two top investigators on the case, and Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance Jr. made what they termed the courageous decision to inform the defense and agree to release Strauss-Kahn without bail.

Officials realized that for six weeks, ever since the May 14 incident, she had bamboozled some of the best minds in the storied Manhattan DA's Office, including a trio of seasoned top investigators with a combined 75 years in the business -- Joan Illuzzi-Orbon, Ann Prunty and Chief DA Investigator Rob Mooney.

Vance "put his very best, most intelligent people on this -- and eventually, we found the truth," said one top investigator.

Defense lawyer Benjamin Brafman declined to talk about the pending dismissal, or about a meeting set for tomorrow morning between the defense team and Vance.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/da_s ... clMsm6zNWJ
...........................

Judging from the letter they sent DSK's attorneys (link on previous page) I'd say pulling the plug is the only choice they've got.

p.s. it's to Vance's great credit that he drilled to the bottom of this scamola, or near it, right down to the cassette with the phony rape story handed to Diallo by persons unknown to help her memorize her lines. But he'll get nothing but grief from the Greenwald crowd, mark my words.
User avatar
lupercal
 
Posts: 1439
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:06 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: IMF managing director arrested, accused of sexual attack

Postby Peachtree Pam » Tue Jul 05, 2011 1:23 pm

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/07/ ... UF20110705


UPDATE 1-DSK accuser sues NY Post for "prostitute" report


Tue Jul 5, 2011 12:37pm EDT

(Corrects to show suit filed in Bronx, not Manhattan; fixes number of defendants) (Adds that Post spokesman unavailable for comment)

NEW YORK, July 5 (Reuters) - The hotel maid who accused former IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn of sexual assault sued the New York Post and five of its journalists for libel on Tuesday for reporting that she was a prostitute.

The 32-year-old Guinean immigrant accused the Post of publishing defamatory articles between July 2-4 "in an apparent desperate attempt to bolster its rapidly plunging sales."

The suit filed in Bronx state court seeks damages to be determined at trial for articles it said the Post knew were false or should have known were false before they were published.

A spokesman for the Post was not immediately available for comment.

On Friday prosecutors called into question the woman's credibility for a series of lies about her background including a false story about being gang-raped on her application for U.S. asylum.

The Post reported on Saturday that the Sofitel housekeeper "was doing double duty as a prostitute, collecting cash on the side from male guests." An article the following day reported that the housekeeper "continued to work as a prostitute in a Brooklyn hotel where she was stashed by prosecutors."

"All of these statements are false, have subjected the plaintiff to humiliation, scorn and ridicule throughout the world by falsely portraying her as a prostitute or as a woman who trades her body for money and they constitute defamation and libel per se," the suit said.
Peachtree Pam
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 9:46 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: IMF managing director arrested, accused of sexual attack

Postby lupercal » Tue Jul 05, 2011 2:23 pm

JackRiddler wrote:In the long course of this thread a lot of potentially odious ideas have been thrown around

France24 wrote:Government slams ‘odious’ Strauss-Kahn conspiracy theories
04/07/2011 - http://www.france24.com/en/20110704-fra ... s-new-york

:whistling:
User avatar
lupercal
 
Posts: 1439
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:06 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: IMF managing director arrested, accused of sexual attack

Postby Stephen Morgan » Tue Jul 05, 2011 2:28 pm

On an unrelated note, someone I know is going to prison for sexual assault, I today found out.
Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that all was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, and make it possible. -- Lawrence of Arabia
User avatar
Stephen Morgan
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:37 am
Location: England
Blog: View Blog (9)

Re: IMF managing director arrested, accused of sexual attack

Postby eyeno » Sun Jul 10, 2011 2:11 am

Still trying to digest all this. I'll probably have to watch it several times because it is so dense with information and his accent is hard for me to understand. But it is definitely interesting. It seems like this guy's take is that Kahn was working with the State Dept. attempting to engineer the take down of criminals like Poppy Bush and other huge fish.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6kJvmN4 ... ded#at=487

User avatar
eyeno
 
Posts: 1878
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 5:22 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: IMF managing director arrested, accused of sexual attack

Postby Stephen Morgan » Sun Jul 10, 2011 2:58 am

eyeno wrote:Still trying to digest all this. I'll probably have to watch it several times because it is so dense with information and his accent is hard for me to understand. But it is definitely interesting. It seems like this guy's take is that Kahn was working with the State Dept. attempting to engineer the take down of criminals like Poppy Bush and other huge fish.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6kJvmN4 ... ded#at=487


Brummie, I think.
Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that all was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, and make it possible. -- Lawrence of Arabia
User avatar
Stephen Morgan
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:37 am
Location: England
Blog: View Blog (9)

Re: IMF managing director arrested, accused of sexual attack

Postby seemslikeadream » Thu Jul 14, 2011 9:53 pm

"What is the end of our revolution? The tranquil enjoyment of liberty and equality; the reign of that eternal justice, the laws of which are graven, not on marble or stone, but in the hearts of men, even in the heart of the slave who has forgotten them, and in that of the tyrant who disowns them."

-- Maximillien Robespierre

Bastille Day Edition
July 14, 2011
Conspirators Unmasked in the Strauss-Kahn Drama
New DSK Charge: Attempted Rape of His Daughter's 23-Year-Old Friend

By PAM MARTENS

The political theorists in France and Russia may be correct: Dominique Strauss-Kahn may have enemies that want to end his political career for nefarious agendas. If that is the case, it will certainly be discovered by the legions of former CIA operatives, former Assistant U.S. Attorneys, and private investigators on his or his heiress wife’s payroll.

One could even proffer a whole new conspiracy theory: it’s really Anne Sinclair that’s the target. Forbes Magazine estimates her net worth at $100 to $200 million. That can buy a lot of intelligence from former CIA agents who previously kept our secrets on this side of the pond. Ms. Sinclair has her own blog, penned in French but focused on the U.S. She spent the days of May leading up to the arrest of her husband, writing not so pleasant critiques of the Obama administration executing Osama bin Laden rather than taking him to trial (as a proper democracy would) and making sport of the infamous White House photo of Hillary Clinton looking shocked with her hand over her mouth as she sat with national security staff during the bin Laden mission.

But a careful assessment of the three well documented cases against Strauss-Kahn by reproaching women, spanning two continents, three countries, and eight years reveal a conspiracy of the man against himself in serial feats of self destruction, each time, up to now, remedied by his coterie of enablers. The actors in this epic tragedy are: Strauss-Kahn, Anne Sinclair, the global law firm of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, and global public relations handlers. There is also a subplot that draws in the print dailies of New York City which are, like the U.S. economy, locked in a financial race to the bottom on a failed business model. (Similar to the complaint of Ms. Sinclair on the execution of bin Laden without a trial, first her husband and now his housekeeper accuser have been alternately tried and convicted, not in a courtroom in front of a jury armed with fact and law and first-hand testimony, but in a reckless form of front page newsprint paintball that elevates to almost civilized the bygone era of city stocks in the town square. And the public feels it is further from the truth in this case than we were two months ago.

For those who rigidly cling to the belief that the conspirators are the female accusers, a close review of the timeline and publicly available documents are in order. Surprisingly, much of this information has not been heretofore disclosed; ostensibly lost in the competitive pursuit of “hooker” and “Le Perv” bold headlines.

A talented journalist and novelist in France; a brilliant Hungarian economist now in London who is an expert on African poverty; and an immigrant from that very poverty in Guinea working as a hotel housekeeper in New York City; all have one thing in common: they think the former Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and aspiring occupant of the Elysee Palace is a sexual predator.

Let’s start with the first acknowledged incident. Tristane Banon is now a 32 year old journalist with three published novels to her credit. In a February 2007 French television program, Banon recounted how Strauss-Kahn had sexually assaulted her in Paris in 2003 when she met him for a professional interview at what turned out to be an empty apartment with little more than a bed. He told her the apartment belonged to a friend. The television program bleeped Strauss-Kahn’s name when the show aired. According to Banon, at the time of the attack, she immediately reported it to her mother by phone from her car. Her mother is Anne Mansouret, a successful business woman and a colleague in Strauss-Kahn’s own Socialist Party. Her mother urged Banon not to file charges at the time of the incident. Mansouret now says she regrets that decision and has publicly urged Strauss-Kahn to seek treatment.

At the time of the alleged attack, Banon was 23; Strauss-Kahn was more than twice her age; and Banon was the close friend of Strauss-Kahn’s daughter, Camille. (Pause for a moment and reflect on what you might do if you learned that a middle-aged man had sexually attacked your young daughter’s girlfriend. Anne Sinclair did learn about this episode and defended a politician’s need to be a good “seducer.”)

Banon has recently filed criminal charges of attempted rape with law enforcement in France and has given over five hours of testimony. Her mother has given a reported six hours of testimony. Strauss-Kahn’s French lawyer, Henri Leclerc, has just filed slander charges against Banon. Strauss-Kahn has publicly called Banon’s charges “imaginary.” Banon, who appears disturbingly thin in recent photographs, told the French publication L’Express: “My only way forward, to not collapse completely, is that justice may know that I am the victim.”

Is there a basis for anything suggesting a U.S. inspired conspiracy against Strauss-Kahn in this episode? This is a French journalist who says the act occurred in 2003 on French soil. Her mother was immediately told of the event eight years ago and is a member of the same political party of Strauss-Kahn. Banon recounted her story on television in 2007, four years before the hotel housekeeper came forward in the U.S. with a new charge of attempted rape by Strauss-Kahn. The only pattern emerging here is Strauss-Kahn being charged with jumping petite women for sexual pleasure and then smearing their name through high-powered lawyers.

The next acknowledged episode in time sequence order, and perhaps the most revealing, occurs in 2008. Peroski Nagy is currently a Senior Advisor at the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development but worked at the IMF when the incidents occurred.

When Strauss-Kahn arrived at the IMF in 2007, Nagy had worked there for more than two decades. On October 20, 2008 these are some of the written statements Nagy made to the law firm of Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP as it conducted an investigation for the IMF on Strauss-Kahn having an affair with Nagy, his subordinate:

"Despite my long professional life, I was unprepared for the advances of the managing director of the IMF. I did not know how to handle this; as I told you, I felt 'I was damned if I did and damned if I didn't.’ ”

“Because I did not fully trust the internal processes at the [International Monetary] fund, I declined to cooperate with the fund’s initial investigation…”

“I believe that Mr. Strauss-Kahn abused his position in the manner in which he got to me…”

“I provided you the details of how he summoned me on several occasions and came to make inappropriate suggestions…”

“I fear that he is a man with a problem that may make him ill-equipped to lead an institution where women work under his command.”

Just to recap: Anne Mansouret, a colleague of Strauss-Kahn’s in the French Socialist Party, thinks he has a sex problem and needs “treatment”; Nagy, his colleague at the IMF, thinks he has a “problem” and “abused” his position. These written statements were made three years prior to the hotel housekeeper charges in New York City. In fact, they raise the serious question as to whether a woman was sexually assaulted in a hotel in 2011 because of a lax investigation at the IMF in 2008.

Despite these powerful written statements by Nagy, five days later when the report was issued by the law firm hired by the IMF, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, it made no mention of Nagy’s letter and fully exonerated Strauss-Kahn. The report flatly stated that the IMF, based in Washington, D.C., “is not governed by domestic employment laws.”

Whether a woman working on U.S. soil could be summarily barred from the protection of U.S. law is likely debatable, but it’s a handy statement by Morgan Lewis, carrying the imprimatur of a firm with over $1 billion in revenues and just under 1300 attorneys spanning the globe. What is beyond debate is that Morgan Lewis knows what constitutes sexual harassment in the workplace under U.S. law and how to put sound anti-harassment policies in place. In 1996, the firm represented the City of Boca Raton in a landmark appellate decision, Faragher v. City of Boca Raton. The case went on to be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court and the decision exquisitely defines what constitutes a sexually hostile work environment and tangible employment action in retaliation for complaining, e.g. firing, demotion, etc.

Since the United States is a major financial supporter of the IMF, our Congress should investigate why the IMF effectively exonerated its chief from hitting on a subordinate and left him at the helm while she was sent on her way with a severance package.

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP is one of Wall Street’s favorite law firms. Like Wall Street, the IMF has adopted the code words “Best Practices,” a euphemism meaning if your competition is getting away with something, you should be able to do the same. In many cases, “Best Practices” bear little differentiation from “Worst Practices.”

The Morgan Lewis report goes on to note that “During the course of the investigation, independent counsel [Morgan Lewis] reviewed other allegations involving the MD [Managing Director] raised by witnesses during the investigation. The investigation did not find any evidence to support other allegations of improper conduct by the MD.” Unfortunately, like the report failing to mention the smoking gun letter from Nagy, the public is deprived of knowing what these allegations were and how they were disproved. What we do know is that three years later, a lot of taxpayer money that New Yorkers can ill afford to spend is being devoted to investigating another charge of sexual misconduct by Strauss-Kahn.

When the Morgan Lewis report was released on a Saturday, October 25, 2008, the IMF held a conference call with the press. A. Shakour Shaalan, Dean of the Executive Board of the IMF, made the following remark, the last sentence being regrettably non-clairvoyant: “I'll have to agree with you that there is a number of staff, particularly the female members, who are not at all happy and do not approve of the Managing Director's behavior. The Managing Director as Mr. Masood Ahmed has said has expressed his regrets and I don't think we can ask him to do more at this time other than publishing the statement that we have published…The effectiveness of the Managing Director has been proven, we will continue to work with him, and there is little doubt in my mind that while there is some confidence that may have been lost, he will regain it very soon.”

The Morgan Lewis report was called an “independent investigation” by the IMF and carries that title on its cover page. But Morgan Lewis is a corporate law firm that almost exclusively litigates against the employee on issues of workplace harassment and sexual misconduct on behalf of the corporation, municipality or organization. The firm also represents some of the largest Wall Street firms which benefit from privatization efforts imposed by the IMF.

The final case of 2011 is, of course, that of the housekeeper at the ritzy Sofitel Hotel in New York City who claims she entered the room to clean it after assurances by a coworker who had removed a room service cart that it was empty. She further claims Strauss-Kahn emerged naked from the bathroom, jumped her, attempted to rape her and then forced her to perform oral sex. The housekeeper had the sympathy and support of the press while she was being represented by her first lawyer, Jeffrey Shapiro. But that suddenly changed when she changed law firms.

In a matter of weeks, the housekeeper went from being a pious religious woman in the pages of the New York Times to a “hooker” on the front page of the New York Post. Joan Illuzzi-Orbon, the lead prosecutor for the New York County District Attorney, told the New York Times that she did not have one “scintilla” of evidence to support the hooker accusation. Her new lawyers have filed a lawsuit against the New York Post for libel. Equally troubling, her new attorneys are not making her available to the District Attorney for questioning, and bad mouthing the DA to the press.

There’s an old saying in legal circles: to find the culprit, ask who benefits. If the housekeeper is discredited and the DA is discredited, the defense team and Strauss-Kahn benefit.

Despite repeated attempts to get an answer, the new law firm, Thompson Wigdor, will not say how they came to represent the housekeeper. But one thing is beyond dispute: all three partners who started this firm, Kenneth P. Thompson, Douglas H. Wigdor, and Scott Browning Gilly sprang from Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, the firm that exonerated Strauss-Kahn in the Nagy matter at the IMF. (Mr. Gilly left Thompson Wigdor this year.)
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: IMF managing director arrested, accused of sexual attack

Postby lupercal » Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:10 pm

Counterputz wrote:One could even proffer a whole new conspiracy theory: it’s really Anne Sinclair that’s the target. Forbes Magazine estimates her net worth at $100 to $200 million. That can buy a lot of intelligence from former CIA agents who previously kept our secrets on this side of the pond.

This is what makes counterpunch so laughable: they find spooks where they aren't (defending DSK, right) but where they're actually stirring up shit -- actual high-profile conspiracies like setting up DSK, 911, 7/7, Madrid, OKC, JFK, MLK, Bobby, etc etc -- they're as oblivious as Alfred E. Neuman. Case in point: the "Dumb Democrats" piece which goes on for what, 30 paragraphs, without once mentioning spooks or any spook agency. It's all the black guy's fault, and our fault for supporting him, so let's stay home next election because Obama is even worse than Bush-Cheney.

Anyway Hugh does this much better so I'll leave off until he gets back. Happy Bastille day.
User avatar
lupercal
 
Posts: 1439
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:06 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Grizzly and 155 guests