Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
vanlose kid wrote:*
thanks Alice. reposting in full.The revolution will be painted: Cairo street art
...
...
Egypt clashes after police released on bail
Riots in Cairo after seven police officers accused of killing protesters during uprising are freed
guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 5 July 2011 09.56 BST
Hundreds of Egyptians scuffled with security guards in a court in Cairo and blocked a major road for hours after a judge ordered the release of 10 police officers charged with killing protesters during the country's uprising.
Monday's unrest added to tensions already running high in Egypt over the ruling military council's failure to hold accountable security forces involved in killing protesters during the demonstrations that toppled the former president, Hosni Mubarak.
Nearly five months later, only one police officer has been convicted in the deaths of more than 846 people killed in a government crackdown on protesters. He was tried in absentia.
During court proceedings on Monday, guards had to intervene to separate relatives of the victims and families of the defendants, even before the decision was read. In his initial statement, the judge seemed to suggest he would impose harsh sentences, saying that "the blood of those killed will not be spilled in vain", according to the Egyptian news agency Mena.
However, he then ordered the release of the defendants, sparking a riot. The victims' families scuffled with the guards and tried to rush toward the defendants, who were hurried out of court. A number of relatives of the protesters killed in the uprising tried to storm the judge's office, but were blocked by soldiers.
Egypt's prosecutor-general, Mahmoud Abdel-Meguid, ordered the court's decision overturned in an attempt to defuse anger. But a lawyer for the victims' families said the move was "illegal" because the prosecutor-general had no authority over the court. "They are trying to deceive the people to pacify them," said Amin Ramez, a lawyer. "The policemen are now at army headquarters seeking protection. If people saw them, they would tear them apart."
Ali el-Ganadi, father of one of the victims, said he received a promise from the prosecutor-general to enforce the annulment of the court's order and bring the officers back to jail.
Relatives of those killed in the uprising blocked traffic for at least six hours on the road from Cairo to Suez, leaving hundreds of cars lined up. The court case involved protesters killed in Suez.
Ramez spoke to Associated Press by phone from the Cairo-Suez road, about 60 miles outside of Cairo. He said truck drivers and Suez residents joined the protesters while the military tried to negotiate the blockade.
A couple of hours after nightfall, El-Ganadi, the spokesman for Suez victims' families, said the protesters had started reopening the road. After clearing the street, they moved to Suez, according to one protester, Ahmed Khafagi. He said traffic has been halted inside two main squares in the city and thousands of people are rallying and chanting slogans, including "Down with the military junta". "People are boiling," an activist, Ahmed Abdel Gawad, said.
The policemen were charged with killing 17 people and injuring more than 350 in Suez during the 18-day uprising that ended with the ousting of Mubarak on 11 February. The court released seven of them on bail and postponed their trials until 14 September. Three are being tried in absentia.
Suez was a flashpoint of violence during the uprising, with many deadly confrontations between tens of thousands of protesters and security forces. Footage posted on YouTube showed police officers at a police station in the main square opening fire on protesters.
Ramez said the court over the past four sessions had rejected demands by families' lawyers to add 41 other police officers to the case. "We provided them with footage and visual evidence that show those policemen holding guns and automatic weapons and hunting down the protesters as if they were hunting birds. But the judge didn't summon them."The spark of the revolution came from Suez and the second revolution will also come out of Suez," he said.
The release of the officers has strengthened plans for a million-strong rally on 8 July to push for fair trials of former regime members, including senior security personnel suspected of giving the order to shoot protesters during the uprising.
Mahmoud Ibrahim, one of the youth groups that led the uprising, said Suez residents were planning to turn out in force for the demonstration.
In Cairo, a security official said anti-riot police fired teargas to disperse dozens of people around a police station in the centre of the city. The reason for the tensions there could not immediately be confirmed, he added.
Suez is located at the northern tip of the Suez Canal, which links the Red Sea and the Mediterranean. The waterway is a vital source of foreign currency.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/ju ... e-released
MacCruiskeen wrote:Enjoy your holiday, Alice, and thanks for all your work.
Vive la révolution!
@Gsquare86 wrote:Gigi Ibrahim جييييج
Waking up to a lot of shit..#Tahrir sit-in on the other hand is continuing and nothing will stop it but the demands to be met
The occupation of Tahrir Square enters its second day, with a growing consensus around seven demands that must be met before the the sit-in would end
Salma Shukrallah, Saturday 9 Jul 2011
SNIP
Late Friday night several demonstrators were collecting signatures from the different political groups, parties and movements taking part in the sit-in on seven points drafted as a proposal for a joint statement of demands and as conditions for the protesters leaving Tahrir and other sit-in sites around the country.
The demands are:
1) The immediate release of all civilians who have been sentenced by military courts and their retrial before civilian courts. Military trials for civilians are to be totally banned.
2) A special court should be established to try those implicated in the killing of protesters during the January 25 Revolution, and all implicated police officers are to be suspended immediately.
3) The sacking of the current minister of the interior and his replacement by a civilian appointee, to be followed by the declaration of a plan and timetable for the full restructuring of the Ministry of Interior, placing it under judicial oversight.
4) The sacking of the current prosecutor general and the appointment of a well-respected figure in his place.
5) Putting Hosni Mubarak and members of his clique on trial for the political crimes committed against Egypt and its people.
6) Revoking the current budget and the drawing up of a new draft budget that courageously acts to respond to the basic demands of the nation’s poor, and putting that draft budget to public debate before its adoption.
7) Clear and open delineation of the prerogatives of the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces, ensuring its powers do not infringe on the powers and prerogatives of the cabinet. The prime minister should have full powers to appoint aides and members of his cabinet, once that cabinet is purged of the remnants of the old regime.
http://english.ahram.org.eg/NewsContent ... -day-.aspx
http://counterpunch.org/walberg07082011.html
Weekend Edition
July 8 - 10, 2011
Time to Default?
Egypt vs. the IMF
By ERIC WALBERG
It is no secret that Egypt has put all its faith in the US and Western international institutions since the days of Egyptian president Anwar Sadat, contracting a huge foreign debt, a process that was increasingly corrupt, despite being careful watched over by those very agencies. This debt is financed by foreign banks, and must be repaid in dollars -- with interest. If much of the money they create and then "lend" is siphoned off into Swiss bank accounts, that is Egypt's problem. No one is trying to charge the people who gave Mubarak or his henchmen their money and then let them re-deposit it with them, but it takes two to tango.
Whether or not a fraction of it actually helps the Ahmeds in the meantime, it is the Egyptian people who are held responsible for it all and must comply with IMF "adjustment programmes", involving privatisation, deregulation, regressive taxation, an end to subsidies to the poor, and much more unpleasant "tough love".
Egypt's revolution momentarily shattered the complacency of this devilish scenario. The explosion under the weight of the grinding poverty the system produced caught the Western bankers and political leaders by surprise and they hurried to embrace the revolution and co-opt it when they realised it was inevitable. This culminated in the IMF's offer of the loan to cover the yawning gap in Egypt's first post-revolution budget, which will double the lowest salaries, improve social services and introduce a progressive income tax.
This unusual gesture of generosity by the IMF (a low interest rate and supposedly no strings attached) was really intended to keep Egypt from straying from the orthodox monetary fold, as other countries have done in the past in similar situations. It was enthusiastically supported by Egypt's elite, largely trained at US universities in the arcana of monetary theory. "Otherwise, Egypt was about to be considered in default," Hani Genena, senior economist at Pharos Holding for Investments told Al-Ahram Weekly. This is precisely what countries such as Russia, Argentina and Ecuador have done in the past.
The Higher Council of the Armed Forces, Egypt's de facto ruler, was not impressed with assurances that the loans were "without conditions", and General Sameh Sadeq told the government to cancel the loan, with its "five conditions that totally went against the principles of national sovereignty" which would "burden future generations". Finance Minister Samir Radwan complied and hastily negotiated funds from Qatar and Saudi Arabia (countries with their own agendas for Egypt's revolution) to plug the remaining hole. The spurned lover, the IMF, and its sidekick the World Bank, were not pleased. The latter said it would have to "review" its financial plans for Egypt.
As news of the loan tiff was breaking, US Senators John McCain, Joe Lieberman and John Kerry visited Cairo to offer their gift to the revolution: a bill in Congress to create "economic assistance funds" for Egypt and Tunisia. Recall McCain's presidential campaign slogan to "Bomb, bomb, bomb Iran!", and his and Lieberman's militant support of Israel. If anything, their visit merely confirmed to Egypt's military leaders the need to keep the IMF and its henchmen at bay.
Another visitor to Cairo last week was Mahatir Mohamed, who turned Malaysia into an economic powerhouse after extricating it from its colonial past. When his "tiger" economy was subverted by speculators in 1997, he stopped the run on the Malaysian currency and stabilised the economy without going to the IMF cap in hand, and Malaysia survived the crisis much better than the other "Asian tigers" who bowed to IMF pressure. "Malaysians refused the IMF and World Bank's assistance because we wanted our economic decisions to be independent," he told reports in Cairo this week proudly -- music to Field Marshall Mohamed Tantawi's ears.
In fact, many observers are convinced the army's decision was in response to the same popular anger and national pride that allowed Mahatir to successfully defy the bankers in his day. "I felt a surge of pride when I heard the loan was rejected," University of Cairo employee Mohamed Shaban told the Weekly. Egyptians intuitively understand Mayer Rothschild's principle: "Give me control of a nation's currency and I care not who makes her laws." Egypt's military leaders understand this too.
The process of petitioning the grudging financial centres of Zurich and London to recover at best a tiny fraction of the stolen billions that were stashed abroad and thus are responsible for an outsize part of Egypt's foreign debt will take decades and yield precious little besides huge legal costs, as the experience of the Philippines and Indonesia shows.
Egypt indeed could consider defaulting on what is called in financial jargon an "odious debt", referring to the national debt incurred by a regime for purposes that do not serve the best interests of the nation. The US did this to tear up Iraq's debt in 2003. Ecuador did it in 2009. The latter (unlike the US in Iraq) even in compliance with international law. Greek citizens have already formed an Audit Committee to establish which parts of the national debt are "odious" or otherwise illegitimate.
But such a radical step would bring the collective wrath of the powerful world financial elite down on Egypt and is not an easy option. There is no longer a Soviet Union to turn to, as there was in the time of Nasser, when he dared defy the empire.
But neither is there any need to leave Egypt's budgetary financing up to an elite of world bankers. Once a government realises that money is just a convention, something that it can use responsibly to grease the wheels of the economy, to generate employment and incomes, using the nation's wealth for the people, it can responsibly create what money it needs, keeping a careful eye on what will increase production and wealth without putting too much pressure on prices. Taxation returns this money that the government in effect "loaned" to itself interest-free.
Michael Hudson, president of the Institute for the Study of Long Term Economic Trends and adviser to the Russian, Japanese and Icelandic governments, argues that Egypt has a "much broader choice" than Western governments in pursuing an independent financial and economic reform, as it still has nationally-owned commercial banks. It could set up a Recovery Fund for the Revolution without any need to borrow from anyone, using Egypt's millions of unemployed -- a force that can move mountains -- as collateral, to create jobs which will automatically repay the money the government creates in new income and more tax revenue.
The plan to bring Toshka back to life by redistributing land to peasants and providing them with start-up capital is a perfect example of what must be done. There is no reason to "borrow" this money, especially from other countries, and worse yet to pay them interest. After all, investment in the country's future is a risk that should be equally share by both the giver and taker of loans, in compliance with sharia law.
Hudson's associates at the Center for Full Employment and Price Stability, the Levy Economics Institute, and the Center for Full Employment and Equity are now preparing a report for the Asian Development Bank on alternative monetary and fiscal policies to promote full employment and price stability without relying on IMF/WB funding.
Eric Walberg writes for Al-Ahram Weekly You can reach him at http://ericwalberg.com/
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 169 guests